Month: June 2023

MP3 of Friday 9th June 2023 Show [right click to download]… …(from c. 23:00) – Links to this week’s full interviews, bottom of page
SHOW STARTS AT 17:00 BST – FOR 3 HRS TO c. 20:00
17:00 to 20:00 BST, 12:00-15:00 EST, 09:00-12:00 PST. 08:00-11:00 NZ Time – Repeats 11 & 5 AM & PM BST daily on our Sputnik stream – DOWNLOAD THE NOT THE BCFM POLITICS SHOW APP –
Click here to Listen live online each week LIVE STREAM www.talkradio.org.uk Alternative live stream www.radioquk.com
OR Download The Show After Transmission HERE
TONY’S BOOKS: Bilderberg.org – PAPERBACKS – TONY’S CHANNELS: Telegram – Bitchute – 911 Forum – Radio4All – The Land Is Ours – VK – Twitter – NSAbook – Odysee – Rumble – Censorious YouTube: Peter Borenius & Public Enquiry

Radio4All mp3 audio files usually available from 23:00 2-4hrs, after TX – we’ll credit you if you rebroadcast. Any probs. mp3s should be on alternative links below by then

Part One – News Review and Investigative Reports

Judith Brown joins Tony and Martin. She has investigated Fact Checkers around the world and produced a report: Fact Checking the Fact Checkers – by Dr Judith Brown (June 2023)   Fact Checking the Fact Checkers By Dr. Judith Brown, PhD., M.Sc., M.Sc.Econ.; M.Research (Journalism). Fact checking itself is not new. It is and was a function of the press and broadcasters; journalists check sources and content of stories to ensure that published news stories are realistic, in order to protect the reputation of media outlets. This does not mean that the news is always accurate or unbiased, as story selection, perspective and external and internal influence inevitably alter the way that information and news are presented. In most news outlets there is also an opportunity to comment on news stories, adding a subjective perspective to published or broadcast items. Journalists inevitably have a close relationship with governments and powerful institutions, and they often work in partnership to shape the contents of media output. The advent of social media altered the relationship between power, the media, and the public; Facebook was launched in 2004, followed by Twitter in 2006, and since then social media has continued to grow. This gave the opportunity for citizen journalism – for ordinary people to share with others their uncensored view of world events. The response to the loosening control of information was for the development of a new industry – independent fact checkers. One of the first fact check platforms was Politifact, in USA, in 2007 In UK Full Fact was launched in 2010; fact check platforms began to proliferate throughout the world, such as Africa Check in 2012; and BOOMlive in India in 2016. The Poynter Institute in Florida began to network with these new platforms, and in 2015 launched the International Fact Checking Network (IFCN), by 2016/17 they established a Code of Principles. There are 171 fact checking groups listed as verified signatories in May 2023, of which 41 were first verified in 2017, demonstrating the industry’s growth.

https://www.facebook.com/brabinger/posts/pfbid02LDKwiPcFbdJSzrFArV6evVgQLYtygTETZ3WcDFbbGbTc3phdRW7acMtWw22rzNcAl?__cft__[0]=AZXZmzbwXMAL-yIIFmk_jeBtA4hqsZ0QRqZziH-UE0AZT66fen8eUaDUtIYub1Q4Sm-OQVPg9Q0I6w0hYknSwAepYYXJ5Va1rC33LQhuppZk57VL6KYWiDZX_ks6A12gjmcF4rp1q-S3DpYCwku7L8nFDr6f-yvrDV1PGKLWDS3ZgA&__tn__=%2CO*F

Who funds the fact checkers around the world and what are their political motives. Greyzone – Marianna Spring – Kit Klarenberg – bio of Marianna Spring. The BBC isn’t exposing disinformation. It’s peddling it Jonathan Cook The state broadcaster says its new Verify service will subject its own journalism to more rigorous fact-checking. But a far less neutral agenda appears to be concealed beneath this lofty aspiration To much fanfare last week, the BBC rolled out its latest public service: BBC Verify. The British state broadcaster promised that a team of dedicated reporters would work on behalf of viewers to counter “the growing threat of disinformation”. On the plus side, the BBC claims it will subject its own journalism to more rigorous fact-checking and data analysis “in the pursuit of truth”. But a far less neutral agenda appears to be concealed beneath this lofty aspiration. Introducing the new service on the BBC Breakfast morning show, “disinformation and social media correspondent” Marianna Spring gave a flavour of what was in store. The BBC’s own, all-too-visible failings appeared far from her thoughts. She drew digital arrows on a screen, creating a sinister network of ties between “far-right figures” with “foreign links” on one side, and a “UK conspiracy movement” and “alternative media” on the other. If anyone assumed Verify would be scrutinising the long track record of the BBC and the rest of the UK’s establishment media in misleading audiences, they look set to be sorely disappointed. Even Spring’s job title connects disinformation specifically to social media rather than to the so-called “legacy media” to which she belongs. – – Ministry of Truth’ It is worth remembering that it was the BBC’s all-too-real Ministry of Information, where George Orwell worked during World War Two, that became the model for the fictional “Ministry of Truth” in his dystopian novel Nineteen Eighty-Four. The Ministry of Truth’s slogan ran: “Who controls the past controls the future: who controls the present controls the past.” A state broadcaster telling the public that it has special insights into truth – and anyone who disagrees is dangerously promoting “disinformation” – has a long and ugly pedigree. Far from prioritising “independence” as it proclaims, the BBC was originally set up as a vehicle for promoting British establishment interests, as its founder confided in a diary entry in 1926 concerning that year’s General Strike. Lord Reith wrote of the British government: “They know they can trust us not to be really impartial.” In 2009, a former director general of the BBC, Greg Dyke, suggested nothing had changed eight decades on. He argued that BBC news coverage was part of a Westminster “conspiracy” designed to keep a failing British political system from being subjected to “radical change” – a characterisation that was even harder to dismiss after Corbyn became Labour leader six years later. The BBC also appears to have secretly colluded with the British government in its information warfare campaigns abroad.

Elon Musk – got rid of bot profiles on Twitter. How Fact Checkers worked through Covid narrative.

Oliver Dowden – secret unit to suppress lockdown dissent – Mike Graham and Isabel Oakshot on Talk TV.  Oliver Dowden led secret unit to stamp out lockdown dissent during pandemic Story by Investigations team, Christopher Hope • Tuesday Mr Dowden, who was culture secretary at the time, directed the CDU to start tackling Covid disinformation in March 2020. The Telegraph disclosed last week the unit flagged discussions about controversial lockdown policies, and criticism of the mass vaccination of children against Covid, including by using artificial intelligence. Documents also show that British citizens, including well-respected scientists and campaigners, had their posts monitored. The Telegraph understands that Michelle Donelan, Mr Dowden’s eventual successor, tried to have the CDU shut down after she took over at the Department for Culture, Media and Sport in September last year. She was uncomfortable that the unit was flagging social media posts by British citizens that were neither disinformation – false information that is spread deliberately – nor misinformation – false information that is inadvertently spread. Ms Donelan – who is currently on maternity leave – raised concerns with officials at a meeting after she took the post. A source said that she thought the unit should be replaced, or stripped back so that it focused “solely on foreign [material] and disinformation”. Ms Donelan will resume responsibility for the unit when she returns from maternity leave in the summer, in her new role as Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology. On Tuesday Government officials scrambled to stem the growing scandal around the CDU. Mr Dowden joined an urgent meeting with staff to discuss the furore and sources insisted that the CDU’s activities were innocuous because they trawled for information on the open web. The Government has previously said that it did not report any of the examples found by the Telegraph to social media companies for removal, and that it does not report posts by MPs and journalists. However, it has “trusted flagger” status with Twitter and Facebook, allowing it to fast-track complaints about content it believes to be in breach of the platforms’ rules. During the pandemic, Mr Dowden and Matt Hancock, the former health secretary, also attended a meeting with technology companies about how to tackle Covid disinformation. MPs raised concerns about the activities of the CDU with Lucy Frazer, the Culture Secretary, in the House of Commons on Tuesday. Clive Efford, the Labour MP, asked Ms Frazer if she had “any dealings” with the unit and whether she could confirm that the Government “engages companies that use artificial intelligence to scour people’s social media accounts”. Ms Frazer replied that the unit had moved to a different department when she was made Culture Secretary earlier this year, at the same time as wider government changes were ordered by Rishi Sunak. She said: “The position is that the Disinformation Unit sits in DeSIT [the Department of Science, Innovation and Technology]. So I have had no dealings.” Ruth Hannant, her permanent secretary, sitting alongside Ms Frazer, added: “As far as I am aware from conversations from people in DeSIT, the unit has never tracked the activity of individuals.”

National Unin of Journalists (NUJ) withdraw defence of Kit Klarenberg. Fact Check groups have more power than governments? Dogmas and cancel cultures. NUJ throws Kit Klarenberg under the bus after his detention by cops – The UK’s National Union of Journalists (NUJ) has withdrawn a statement in support of Grayzone journalist Kit Klarenberg. It came after counter-terrorism police detained him at Luton airport on 17 May. Kit Klarenberg detained at Luton airport The Grayzone is a controversial US-based media outlet which focuses on US and UK foreign policy, from a non-Western perspective. Some people have accused it of pushing propaganda for authoritarian states like Russia and Syria. However, Grayzone would say it is anti-US imperialism. On Klarenberg’s detention, it reported: As soon as journalist Kit Klarenberg landed in his home country of Britain on May 17, 2023, six anonymous plainclothes counter-terror officers detained him. They quickly escorted him to a back room, where they grilled him for over five hours about his reporting for this outlet. They also inquired about his personal opinion on everything from the current British political leadership to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. The Canary asked the NUJ for comment. We specifically wanted to know why it had withdrawn its statement in support of Klarenberg. It had not responded at the time of publication. Klarenberg’s situation has echoes of UK cops arresting French publishing manager Ernest Moret in April. He works for left-wing publisher Editions La Fabrique. The Guardian reported at the time that: He was arrested, after six hours of questioning, for alleged obstruction in refusing to disclose the passcodes to his phone and computer. It noted that Moret was: “interrogated for several hours and asked some very disturbing questions”, said the publishers, including about his view on pension reform in France, as well as his opinion on the French government and president Emmanuel Macron. As of 2pm on Monday 5 June, the Guardian had failed to report on police detaining Klarenberg. Moreover, the NUJ statement in support of Moret is still online. So, it seems in the corporate media and the NUJ, there’s one rule for some journalists being harassed by cops, and a different one for others. Of course, as writer RD Hale highlighted in Council Estate Media, there’s a massive problem with this. Hale asked : Hands up everyone who only wants to see journalism the government likes? No one? Okay, then we all see the problem here. Detaining journalists: a slippery slope Of course, the cops detaining Klarenberg is mild compared to how other countries treat their journalists. As Reporters Without Borders (RSF) wrote: At least 1,059 journalists have been murdered in the past ten years, and 387 were arbitrarily detained at the end of 2020, according to RSF. The rate of impunity for crimes of violence against journalists is still around 90%. Threats and hate speech against journalists are flourishing online, as well as disinformation. And women journalists are being targeted both as journalists and as women. Moreover, it’s often non-Western countries where journalists’ lives are most at risk. As UNESCO wrote: Latin America and the Caribbean was the deadliest for journalists in 2022 with 44 killings, over half of all of those killed worldwide. Asia and the Pacific registered 16 killings, while 11 were killed in Eastern Europe.

Lord Matt Ridley on Oliver Dowden’s disinformation unit and IEA lockdown report. The UK is blinding itself to the truth about COVID’s origins – Matt Ridley The UK is blinding itself to the truth about COVID’s origins – As a US Senate committee’s full, 300-page report on the origin of covid now makes clear, a whole string of clues now points towards a laboratory accident as the probable cause of the covid pandemic. For example, there is: evidence of a biosafety crisis at the lab in the autumn of 2019; the Chinese authorities’ refusal to share details of early human cases of the disease in November 2019; persistent reports from US intelligence that these early cases includes lab workers; the apparent start of vaccine manufacture in China even before the outbreak was declared; and the astonishingly uncooperative attitude of the Chinese authorities to investigating the origin. Add to these: the failure to find infected animals in markets or on farms; the coincidence of the virus’s closest relatives at the time of the outbreak being inside the Wuhan Institute of Virology; the revelation that that institute brought about 200 kinds of bat coronavirus to Wuhan from a long way away; the risky nature of the research they did to combine the genes of new viruses with existing ones and test them on human cells; the surprising finding that the virus that caused covid has a unique genetic feature that just happens to be of the kind that the institute had been inserting into other viruses; and the blank refusal to share their database of viruses they were working on with the outside world after taking it offline in September 2019. Despite the best efforts of a small group of western virologists who funded or collaborated with that Wuhan laboratory to shut down the debate in the west and label a lab leak a conspiracy theory, the matter will not go away. Yet the British science establishment and the British government, normally so ready to boast of our reputation as a biomedical research hub second only to the United States, has done literally nothing to contribute to this debate. I cannot think of a single significant contribution from our universities and institutes, except the strange role that the Wellcome Trust played in convening a meeting in February 2020 that effectively agreed to mislead the public about the plausibility of a lab leak. With the US government compromised by its having funded the very work in the very lab in Wuhan that is under suspicion, there was a golden opportunity for British scientists and spies to step in as honest brokers and piece together all the evidence. Yet they refused to do so. When I urged the Royal Society at least to debate the matter, they politely declined. When I urged the Academy of Medical Sciences (of which I am a fellow) to investigate, they told me the topic was “too controversial”. Nature, Britain’s and the world’s premier science journal, has confined its reporting to condescending dismissal of all speculation about a lab leak. When I asked a senior scientist to help wake up the science establishment to the biggest enigma science has faced in decades, he said he thought it was vital we do not find out what happened lest it annoy the Chinese government. This is not the stance anybody would take over an accident in an airliner, a chemical plant or a nuclear reactor. Yet unlike such accidents the pandemic killed millions. Of course he is right about the reason for our reticence. The Foreign Office is in permanent kow-tow. Our universities and science journals are dependent directly or indirectly on Chinese funds and infested with people who openly admire authoritarian communism. Senior scientists are worried that admitting a lab leak is plausible would damage the reputation of science. To which I say: not half as much as trying to cover it up.

Global warming and factory farm problems. Did lockdowns work or not? Yemen – peace since Ukraine war.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/i1HyqYlXFmiK/

Better Way Conference, Bath – what Judith felt were highlights of Conference. The Vacine Control Group Initiative at conference – those non vaxxed with Covid jabs as a control group – www.controlgroup.coop. The Control Group Wiki is your platform for Information, Community and Data: The Control Group Cooperative The Covid vaccine study The Health card Technical support portal – account setup, common issues, how to guides Community portal – events, support groups, interviews, social media and chat to the founders Health & Wellbeing portal – products and organisations Research and Data portal – Control Group data, research of interest, recommended reading UK Parliament petition NEW SYSTEM TRANSITION PERIOD We have been redesigning our website, study portal and back-end database to make a more robust system, with better, long-term functionality, flexibility and an improved user experience. Our new look website is up and the back end system will be launched in the next few days. New participants can register to join and existing participants will be migrated to the new system over the next couple of months. Thank you for your patience during this transition period. UK Parliament petition: Debate in Parliament to address the excess mortality in England and Wales A Public Inquiry must be urgently held to discuss the reasons and potential causes behind the excess death rate in England and Wales since the middle of October 2022. The excess deaths are of huge concern to the public and the cause MUST be established. There is concern that these excess deaths are as a result of the Covid 19 vaccines, but Parliament is not addressing this.

Shedding of spike protein from Covid jab?  Daniel Nouriro at conference – supplement to rid body of spike protein  13 ways that the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein causes damage – The SARS-CoV-2 virus has four structural proteins. The spike, membrane, envelop, and nucleocapsid proteins. The spike protein protrudes from the middle of the coronavirus and attaches to the ACE2 receptor of cells to start the process of cell entry, replication, and infection. The two major parts of the spike protein are the S1 and S2 subunit. The S1 has the receptor-binding domain. For easier reading, this review starts with what happens after the COVID jabs, soluble spike proteins, and what it takes to have a normal blood vessel. Then I will enumerate how the spike protein damages the body. What happens after the COVID shots? COVID vaccination aims to produce an immune response against the spike protein in the form of neutralizing antibodies so that in future SARS-CoV-2 exposures, COVID-19 will be prevented. The injected messenger RNA provides instructions to the cells on making the spike proteins. Once the spike protein is produced, it migrates to the outside of the cell to be anchored on the cells’ outer surface, where the immune system will recognize it and develop an immune response to it. (antibodies, T cells, B cells). Soluble spike proteins Ideally, the whole spike protein should stay attached to the outside of the cells. Sometimes incomplete spike proteins are produced in the form of spike peptides. As shown below, they are also presented to the immune system by cells outside the surface with an anchoring protein called the Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC).

https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=811466996990414

BRIBED POLITICIANS 1: BBC QT – cynical King’s Lynn audience member. Labour Party. Liar Politicians: UK Politics Utterly Fraudulent. Corrupted by Finance Capitalism’s devil’s deal with the deep state.  – Expressed by BBCQT Kings Lynne audience member ‘The only man who’s entered parliament with honest intentions was Guy Fawkes’  ‘You Couldn’t Run A Whelk Stall’: BBC Question Time Audience Member Blasts Politicians – A BBC Question Time audience member has let rip at Britain’s political class – claiming it is so “incompetent” the two main parties “couldn’t run a whelk stall”. This week’s show, which came from King’s Lynn in Norfolk, came against the backdrop of more partygate revelations, a backlash to Boris Johnson’s resignation honours list and tensions over the Covid-19 public inquiry. Meanwhile, a poll this week showed the Labour Party is on track to win a landslide 140-seat majority at the next election. One question – what could the Tories could do to turn around their fortunes and win at the general election next year – prompted a diatribe from one member of the audience, who appeared dissatisfied with the way the country is being run regardless of who is charge. He said: “We’ve heard it all before from both of you, from both parties. You’re absolutely incompetent. Those that are not incompetent and corrupt. “I have no idea why any of us bothered to vote for any of you. You couldn’t run a whelk stall, let alone the country. Either of you. “And all you can do is bat off each other and not make any sense whatsoever. Stay behind afterwards. Both of you. Have a word from me, I’ll give you some home truths.“ He added: “I’m sick to death of you. The only person who went in parliament with good intentions was Guy Fawkes.” Both Conservative Lee Rowley and Labour’s Jonathan Ashworth – on the panel – agreed to meet the man afterwards to discuss his concerns. He claimed the recent local elections was the first time he has not voted. Related… 

Man in audience to Rowley and Ashworth, "Both parties are incompetent. And those who are not incompetent are corrupt. Stay behind afterwards, both of you, have a word with me. I'll give you some home truths." #BBCQT – follow for more pic.twitter.com/J8LnilkjAp

— Farrukh (@implausibleblog) June 8, 2023

https://www.bitchute.com/video/mzoU2BkmSRbj/

BRIBED POLITICIANS 2: ‘The Hidden Masters of the Universe’ by Ben Chu on Radio 4 about private equity groups.  The Hidden Masters of the Universe You’ve heard of bankers. You’re perhaps vaguely aware of hedge funds. But private equity? Maybe not. Yet private equity is all around you – from health clinics and supermarkets, to football clubs and the music industry. It might well be housing your granny. Who are these hidden masters of the universe? Private equity describes wealthy investors pooling their money to buy and manage companies that are not listed on, or that they remove from, the public stock markets. To advocates, private equity means better run companies, higher profits and more jobs. To detractors, it’s deplorable secret asset stripping that makes fortunes for the financiers, but which often leads to mass sackings, excessive debt, hollowed out companies and, ultimately, corporate collapse. In this documentary, Ben Chu, economics editor of BBC Newsnight, will introduce you to a burgeoning – but also, by turns, glamorous, mysterious and controversial – hub of 21st century capitalism. One that, whether you know it yet or not, is shaping the world around us. With contributions from: Adrian Axtell, of the Community Union Ludovic Phalippou, professor of Financial Economics at Saïd Business School Jon Moulton, founder of the private equity firm Better Capital Steven Kaplan, Professor of Entrepreneurship and Finance at the University of Chicago Booth School of Business Dan Rasmussen, former associate at the private equity firm Brain Capital, and founder of the hedge fund Verdad Advisers Christine Corlet Walker, research fellow at the Centre for the Understanding of Sustainable Prosperity, University of Surrey Terry Wright, healthcare worker at a UK care home

BRIBED POLITICIANS 3: Black Rock and Vanguard. Who Really Runs The World? Blackrock & Vanguard, C21 Monopoly, Financial 4th Reich & The Great Reset by Monique Jansen – Vrouwen voor Vrijheid – BLACKROCK & VANGUARD – These institutional investors are mainly investment firms banks and insurance companies. In turn, they, themselves are owned by shareholders and the most surprising thing is that they own each other’s stocks Together, they form an immense network comparable to a pyramid. The smaller investors are owned by larger investors. Those are owned by even bigger investors. The visible top of this pyramid shows only two companies whose names we have often seen by now. They are Vanguard and BlackRock. The power of these two companies is beyond your imagination. Not only do they own a large part of the stocks of nearly all big companies but also the stocks of the investors in those companies. This gives them a complete monopoly. A Bloomberg report states that both these companies in the year 2028, together will have investments in the amount of 20 trillion dollars. That means that they will own almost anything Bloomberg calls BlackRock “The fourth branch of government”, because it’s the only private agency that closely works with the central banks. BlackRock lends money to the central bank but it’s also the advisor. It also develops the software the central bank uses. Many BlackRock employees were in the White House with Bush and Obama. Its CEO, Larry Fink can count on a warm welcome from leaders and politicians. Not so strange, if you know that he is the front man of the ruling company. But Larry Fink does not pull the strings, himself. BlackRock, itself is also owned by shareholders. Who are those shareholders? We come to a strange conclusion. The biggest shareholder is Vanguard. But now he gets murky. Vanguard is a private company and we cannot see who the shareholders are. The elite who own Vanguard apparently do not like being in the spotlight but of course they cannot hide from who is willing to dig. Reports from Oxfam and Bloomberg say that 1% of the world, together owns more money than the other 99%. Even worse, Oxfam says that 82% of all earned money in 2017 went to this 1%.

BRIBED POLITICIANS 4: ‘Barbarians at the gate’ [FULL VIDEO] 1993 film about hostile takeovers. ‘ Barbarians at the Gate (1993) Fantastic film based on the RJR Nabisco fiasco. James Garner is excellent as F. Ross Johnson, as is Jonathan Pryce as Henry Kravis! Excellent battle of greed in the corporate world. The battle for the control of RJR Nabisco in the Autumn of 1988, which became the largest and most dramatic corporate takeover in American history, sent shock-waves through the international business world and became a symbol of the greed, excess and egotism of the eighties. Barbarians at the Gate recounts this two-month battle with breathtaking pace and flair, and transports back to the Wall Street empire before it crumbled, through the boardroom doors, into the midnight meetings, the betrayals, the deal makers and publicity flaks, into a world where – as Nabisco CEO Ross Johnson put it – ‘a few million dollars are lost in the sands of time’. Twenty years on, the world is once again recovering from a period of financial extravagance and irresponsibility. This revised edition brings the ultimate business thriller up to date for a new generation of readers. An incredible read that reminds us of the worst excesses of the 1980s. It charts the unimaginable progress of a a food brands company who merge with a bakery and then with a tobacco company who also have a number of food brands. They attempt a management buy out but the Wall St vultures soon start to circle. The excesses are incredible and the voices of the few good men are drowned out. It was the biggest takeover of its day and I’m not sure all of its lessons have been learned. A gripping story, well written – the cast list at the front is essential as so many people were involved in this epic narrative. I think I would have appreciated knowing just what each company was there for – I guess American readers would know which ones were banks, law firms etc but I had to figure it out as I went. An outstanding read for anyone interested in business

https://www.bitchute.com/video/IXFhqtj0walX/

BRIBED POLITICIANS 5: The Corporation’ documentary. C4 News report on Universal Basic Income, a probable Bilderberg subject. Since the late 18th century American legal decision which the business corporation organizational model is a individual, it has become a dominant force around the globe. Documentary that looks at the concept of the corporation throughout recent history up to its present-day dominance.. This picture takes an in-depth psychological examination of this organization model through various case studies. The study demonstrates is that in the its behaviour, this sort of”person” typically acts like a dangerously destructive psychopath without conscience. We see the hazard this psychopath has for our future and our world, but a individuals who have intelligence, courage and determination can do to prevent it. Released: 2003-09-10 Genre: Documentary Casts: Jane Akre, Ray Anderson, Maude Barlow, Chris Barrett, Michael Moore Duration: 145 min Country: Canada Production: Big Picture Media Corporation

Bitchute video of complete show – Essentials: Michael Hudson | Blackrock/Vanguard | Tony on: Brexit & The Traitors of Arnhem | Evolution | We are in a war between God, and Lucifer | Armageddonists I have known: Nick Land (1975-8) | George Monbiot (1995-8)

Part Two – Ukraine/Covid/Climate Accelerationism Round-Up, With End Times Prophecy Reports

Dam breaking in Ukraine and different theories on how it happened. BBC Verify: though the Khakhovka dam story broke on Tuesday 6th June, a much smaller breach in the dam last Thursday (1st June) which appears to have developed as masonry was swept away over the weekend, went unreported. Voloshin, MH17, shot himself. BBC interview former Ukraine President Yatsenyuk about Ukraine war. BBC report on the breaking of Ukraine Dam – Russia’s to blame.

https://twitter.com/Z06Ronald/status/1666368559235100674

Counter offensive and casualties. Martin Frizzel, Editor of This Morning, gives psychopathic response to question abput ‘toxic culture at ITV.

Hannah Borno gives an update on the aftermath of Bilderberg – stories in the headlines that were discussed at Bilderberg, but Bilderberg not mentioned. Swedish NATO negotiator left off Bilderberg list, gets in anyway Stenström quietly attended the conference of transatlantic business and political elites last week, though Bilderberg denies he participated in its actual meeting. By JOSH FRIEDMAN LISBON, Portugal – Artificial intelligence topped the key topics list for the 69th Bilderberg meeting, held last week in Lisbon, Portugal, and the biggest names in the emerging high-tech industry were in attendance at the posh Pestana Palace Lisboa in the Portuguese capital. While present and past CEOs of Open AI, Microsoft, Google and Google DeepMind drew the attention of some United States media, the transatlantic gathering also shaped up quietly, as it has in years past, as an informal NATO summit. Jens Stoltenberg, the head of NATO, attended last week’s Bilderberg Meeting, as did the prime ministers of three of the alliance’s member countries. An ex-prime minister of a country trying to join the alliance, Sweden, also participated in the meeting, and she may or may not have come with a plus-one. In true Bilderberg fashion, Sweden’s chief negotiator for NATO membership attended the gathering of European and North American elites in Lisbon, yet he did not appear on the participants’ list. The only explanation provided thus far for what Oscar Stenström could have been doing inside the fortified Pestana Palace came in the form of a Bilderberg Press Service reply to a CalCoastNews inquiry. “As you can surely imagine, the total number of people in the hotel exceeds the number of participants,” Bilderberg’s press office stated in an email. “There are some accompanying staff members, and they do not participate in the meeting or part of it.” Stenström works as an ambassador for NATO negotiations for the Swedish Prime Minister’s Office. Formally, he is not a member of the staff of any of the listed Bilderberg participants. However, Stenström did accompany one participant on a walk Saturday afternoon in Lisbon. That individual is Stenström’s former boss, ex-Swedish prime minister and current opposition leader, Magdalena Andersson. CalCoastNews spotted Andersson on a walk outside the Pestana Palace and attempted to pose questions to her about Sweden’s NATO bid and what she was doing at the Bilderberg Meeting. Unbeknown that Andersson was sharing an afternoon stroll with Sweden’s top NATO negotiator, CalCoastNews asked the opposition leader whether she had any conversations with alliance chief Stoltenberg and whether Sweden’s effort to join the defense pact had been discussed at the Bilderberg Meeting. Neither Andersson, nor Stenström, addressed the questions. “We’re having a chat,” Andersson said. After a few minutes, the former prime minister and Sweden’s chief NATO negotiator walked past a security checkpoint and returned to the Pestana Palace, ending their afternoon walk abruptly. During the previous Bilderberg Meeting, held June 2 through 5, 2022 in Washington, D.C., Stoltenberg met with Finnish Prime Minister Sanna Marin. Stoltenberg and Marin discussed Finland’s and Sweden’s NATO membership bids, as well as Turkey’s objections to them, the NATO chief stated in a tweet. Though Stoltenberg made no mention of Bilderberg, his tweet contained a photo of him standing with Marin at the hotel in Washington D.C., where the secretive conference was taking place.

Klaus Kopf on how he was advised not to do a paper on Bilderberg at University. US Republicans think Russia should be given Ukraine territory for Peace. Chinese spy base in Cuba.  1:00 – interview with Klaus Kopf, Hamburg-based Political Scientist, who has studied Bilderberg from 1995 – he wasn’t allowed to do a thesis on Bilderberg and was told by Director of the ‘Institute for Peace Research and Security Policy‘ (IFSH) at the University of Hamburg Prof. Dieter Lutz (1994-2003), who had just spoken to his predecessor as institute director and 1971 Bilderberg attendee Egon Bahr (1984-1994): ‘You naive, blue-eyed ass-hole. Do you really think U.S. presidents are voted in? Where do you live?’ Klaus replied, “Is that where we are?” Lutz confirmed, “Yes, that’s where we are.” 4:40 – What Kaethe Koch, the private secretary to Frankfurter Allegemeine Zeitung newspaper founder and lawyer Dr. Rudolf Mueller told him about who invited Mueller to the first Bilderberg meeting in late May 1954. It was Catholic Cardinal of Cologne Josef Frings and Bundesamt für Verfassungsschutz (BfV) internal secret service president, Otto John. 10:35 – Deutsche Bank chairman Alfred Herrhausen advocated forgiving third world debt at Dusseldorf German bankers gathering 1988 and at 1989 Bilderberg meeting then he was ‘assassinated by the Red Army Faction’ (RAF), but one can doubt ‘leftists’ were the real killers. World debt and Brexit, German participants at Bilderberg, ‘The Precariat’, 80-140 attendees at Bilderberg from NATO countries.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jhxKfcAZcJs

Hail Satan film (2019) Satanist guy …..  Everything you know about Satanism is wrong. At least that’s what a new documentary about the Satanic Temple could be about to prove. Despite the similarity of the name, the Temple is different to The Church of Satan, established in 1966 by chat show circuit celebrity Anton LaVey in San Francisco, California. Human sacrifice? Wrong? Blood drinking? Wrong? Black Mass? Well, sort of right. The Temple was founded in 2013 with a mission statement “to encourage benevolence and empathy among all people, reject tyrannical authority, advocate practical common sense and justice, and be directed by the human conscience to undertake noble pursuits guided by the individual will”. Hail Satan? directed by US film-maker Penny Lane, follows the Temple’s attempts to curtail what they see as the encroachment of Christianity on US life through its growing political influence. That creeping theocracy results in a monument to the Ten Commandments being offered pride of place at the Oklahoma State Capitol building in Oklahoma City. The Temple’s response is to ask for a space for their own statue of the Satanic deity Baphomet in a bid to restore some kind of cosmic religious balance, all the while preaching a doctrine in support of social justice and human rights. “We want people to evaluate the United States being a Christian nation,” the Temple’s spokesman Lucien Greaves says in the film’s trailer. “It’s not”. “I had heard about the Satanic Temple when they were doing their campaign in Oklahoma,” says Lane.

Radio4All download pages
COMPLETE SHOW AND FULL INTERVIEWS
[right click to download]
#1 – Complete 3hr 30min show – [right click to download]
Full interviews with…
#2 – Hannah Borno Bilderberg Debrief 2023 00:25:00
#3 – Klaus Kopf Bilderberg Exposed in Dresden 2 Bilderberg Decide On Peace And War 1954 Vatican invite 00:11:00
#4 – Ben Chu Private Equity The Hidden Masters of the Universe 00:30:00
#5 – Isabel Oakshott from London criminals to militarised AI 00:18:00
#6 – Lord Matt Ridley on the mega spin BS batallions 00:08:00
#7 – Better Way Conf Deanie Badrea Vaccine Control Group 00:08:00
#8 – Better Way Conf Anne Gwynnet Oxfordshire anti solar farms campaign 00:09:00
#9 – Better Way Conf Daniele Nuaro Zero Spike Augumented NEC 00:07:00
#10 – The Corporation documentary (2003) 02:25:00
#11 – Hail Satan documentary (2019) 01:25:00

 

BCfm’s weekly Politics Show presented by Tony Gosling with Irish Republican Labour activist Martin Summers was forced off FM, now online only by station manager Pat Hart, ‘rested due to the pandemic’ on 24 March 2020. Bristol Community FM (BCfm) charity ‘CEO’ Patrick Hart is a longtime personal friend of Bristol’s all-powerful right-wing ‘Labour’ mayor Marvin Rees. Now on Internet only NOT The BCfm Politics Show is available 17:00-c. 21:00 live on Fridays. Pat Hart replaced us with an inane student show repeating MSM stories called The Bristol Agenda. If you’d like to share your views on his deliberate dumbing-down and pro-Covid jab mismanagement you can contact UK broadcasting regulator Ofcom or BCfm board chair and the ‘Don’ himself, here.

February 2019 Ofcom complaint result: UKLFI exposed as creation of Israeli foreign ministry – Bristol Post article: BCfm cleared after being reported to Ofcom for anti-semitic conspiracy theories

MP3 of Friday 2nd June 2023 Show [right click to download]… …(from c. 23:00) – Links to this week’s full interviews, bottom of page
SHOW STARTS AT 17:00 BST – FOR 3 HRS TO c. 20:00
17:00 to 20:00 BST, 12:00-15:00 EST, 09:00-12:00 PST. 08:00-11:00 NZ Time – Repeats 11 & 5 AM & PM BST daily on our Sputnik stream – DOWNLOAD THE NOT THE BCFM POLITICS SHOW APP –
Click here to Listen live online each week LIVE STREAM www.talkradio.org.uk Alternative live stream www.radioquk.com
OR Download The Show After Transmission HERE
TONY’S BOOKS: Bilderberg.org – PAPERBACKS – TONY’S CHANNELS: Telegram – Bitchute – 911 Forum – Radio4All – The Land Is Ours – VK – Twitter – NSAbook – Odysee – Rumble – Censorious YouTube: Peter Borenius & Public Enquiry

Radio4All mp3 audio files usually available from 23:00 2-4hrs, after TX – we’ll credit you if you rebroadcast. Any probs. mp3s should be on alternative links below by then

Part One – News Review and Investigative Reports

AI, Dark Enlightenment, Bilderberg. Accelerationism, amphetamine philosophy, and the Death Trip – This is a story about dangerous ideas, and words’ magical power to heal and to harm. It’s about AI, Charles Manson, dubstep, Neo-Nazis, occultism, and a lot of amphetamine, but it’s mainly about Nicholas Land. In 1993, techno-feminist Sadie Plant set up a research unit in the philosophy department at Warwick University called the Cybernetic Culture Research Unit (CCRU). It wasn’t a ‘real’ academic centre — it didn’t have a large grant or any institutional status, it was just a piece of paper on a door. But the name drew people into its vortex. The dominant influence in the CCRU became a 30-year-old mid-career researcher called Nick Land — a fan of continental critical theorists like Deleuze, Guattari and George Bataille. Land and the CCRU mixed together cyberpunk, science-fiction, cryptocurrency, drugs and post-humanism, drained it through the mesh of continental theory, and created Accelerationism. Guardian journalist Andy Beckett has a good definition: Accelerationists argue that technology, particularly computer technology, and capitalism, particularly the most aggressive, global variety, should be massively sped up and intensified — either because this is the best way forward for humanity, or because there is no alternative. Accelerationists favour automation. They favour the further merging of the digital and the human. They often favour the deregulation of business, and drastically scaled-back government. They believe that people should stop deluding themselves that economic and technological progress can be controlled. They often believe that social and political upheaval has a value in itself. Accelerationalism began life as the British cousin of the Californian philosophy of Extropianism, which also began in the early 1990s (as I wrote here). There’s a similar anarcho-libertarianism, hyper-capitalism, worship of new technology and expectation of a sudden leap beyond the human. But this wasn’t California, it was Coventry — and Accelerationism was much darker and more nihilistic than Californian transhumanism. After all, Land’s first book was called ‘Thirst for Annihilation’.

BRICS and alternate power systems to US developed. Eurasian Economic Forum – what they are discussing. West’s economic failure. Russia increases settlements with partners in national currencies ­ Lavrov “As trade turnover grows, the transition to payments in national currencies will become more practical – this is the future,” the Russian top diplomat stressed The process of using national currencies in mutual settlements between Russia and its partner countries will only gain momentum, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov told reporters on Monday. “Of course, as trade turnover grows, the transition to payments in national currencies will become more practical – this is the future. This is true not only for Africa, but also for Latin America, our Asian friends, as well as Iran, India, and China. We are already actively shifting to settlements in national currencies, and the dollar’s share is steadily declining. <…> So, this process will only gain momentum,” he said in response to a question about Kenya’s intention to pay for oil exports in local currency. Lavrov also stated that Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva “has already put forward his idea to focus on the development of payment mechanisms that would not rely on the dollar or the euro and would rely on decisions and agreements that would be developed, including within the framework of the BRICS New Development Bank.”

Special educational needs building to luxury flats  Bristol school redevelopment decision delay leaves campaigners ‘disappointed’ Bristol City Council had been due to consider plans to transform the former SEND school five-acre site at Westbury Park into an £85m retirement community and leisure hub Campaigners have said they are “massively disappointed” after a decision was delayed on the redevelopment of a former Bristol school site, after the plans looked set to be refused. Councillors had been due to meet on Wednesday (May 31) to consider plans to transform a five-acre site at Westbury Park, once the location of St Christopher’s School before its closure in 2020, into an £85m ‘eco retirement village’ and leisure hub. In an update sent out on Tuesday afternoon (May 30), Bristol City Council’s development management team said consideration of the application had been postponed “at the request of the applicant”. It came after planning officers recently recommended that councillors refuse the development, called St Christopher’s Square, with a report saying it would be “unacceptable in terms of design”. On Wednesday (May 31) bosses from the group behind the scheme, which includes investment firm FORE Partnership, care operator Amicala and development manager Socius, told BristolLive they had requested for the decision to be delayed, “to allow officers more time to review their report”.

UK economic situation. Bristol clean air zone. Revealing number of Bristol Clean Air Zone fines would be ‘too confusing’ says council It says the figures would be ‘too confusing’ at this stage, almost six months on Publishing the total number of Clean Air Zone fines issued so far could be too confusing, according to Bristol City Council. Almost six months after the scheme was first introduced, the number of drivers who have been hit with fines remains a mystery. The council refused to answer a recent freedom of information (FoI) request asking for the number of penalty charge notices issued for the Clean Air Zone, from December to March. This is because making these figures available to the public could “result in confusion”. Details of the number of fines, as well as any effect on air pollution, are expected to be published at the end of the year in an update report on the Clean Air Zone. The controversial scheme was introduced last November, covering a wide area around the city centre. Responding to the FoI request, a council officer said: “There is a firm intention to publish the requested information at a future date. Accelerating publication would unnecessarily divert scarce council resources in dealing with premature scrutiny of the success or otherwise of the CAZ scheme, and would represent an inefficient use of public money. “Council officers would have to take time away from their normal duties to locate and collate the information. While we recognise that you have an interest in the detailed information, this has to be balanced with the council’s use of resources in dealing with other tasks and duties required of them as a public authority.

Bitchute video of complete show – Essentials: Michael Hudson | Blackrock/Vanguard | Tony on: Brexit & The Traitors of Arnhem | Evolution | We are in a war between God, and Lucifer | Armageddonists I have known: Nick Land (1975-8) | George Monbiot (1995-8)

Jennifer Bileck on transgenderism to transhumanism. Jennifer Bilek | Big Picture Watch | Who is Behind the TRANS AGENDA? Jennifer Bilek is an investigative journalist, a feminist and a leading voice really looking behind the curtain at who is pushing this TRANS AGENDA! In this interview, we discuss one of the most controversial subjects of our time: the massive effort to promote transgenderism and to push “gender-affirming care” on children. Everyone has heard of the documentary “What is a Woman” but that film didn’t dare ask: “Who is behind this?” This interview was shot as apart of a documentary What Happened At School? We located the most hard-hitting professional journalist digging into who is imposing this bizarre agenda on us. Jennifer Bilek is a lifelong feminist, alarmed by men who don the mask of womanhood and then demand that all of society affirm this “identity.” People are free to do what they like with their own bodies and time, but asking­, nay, forcing­, everyone else to ignore biological reality is another matter. Jennifer Bilek blows the whistle in her hard-hitting investigative pieces that can be found at: www.The11thHourBlog.com 

Natalie Minnis joins Tony and Martin, from former ‘Imagining Freedom’ blog, and now Substack ‘The Purposeful Path’.I started being increasingly concerned about GM foods. I felt that tampering with nature in this way could lead to unforeseen and unexpected consequences. I didn’t think any good could come of it – and maybe more importantly, I didn’t see the need for it. The pro-GM lobby suggested that GM foods would end world poverty. I felt very sceptical about that. And I certainly wasn’t the only one. Around 1999, I went to a public meeting to discuss the issue. I was surprised at the number of scientists and farmers in attendance, many of them speaking quite eloquently against the introduction of GM foods to the UK. I remember that Tony Blair was a supporter of GM foods, and I already disliked him, years before the Iraq War. I started buying organic, feeling it was the only way I could have any control over what I was eating. Sales of organic food started to soar in the UK in the late 1990s. Again, I wasn’t the only one who felt this way. The media started reporting on the surprising increase in the popularity of organic food. At the time there was a lot of division over the issue – people who didn’t want to eat GM foods were described as “unscientific”. But organic food sales kept rising. I started buying most of my food from a local health shop. Again, I don’t think I was the only one. Suddenly there was an astonishing announcement from Sainsbury’s, one of the UK’s “Big Four” supermarkets. Sainsbury’s announced that it had successfully eliminated all GM ingredients from its own-brand products. Other supermarkets soon followed suit, some of them in other European countries. Consumer pressure had trumped political power. EU legislation followed, with tighter controls over food labelling and traceability. Since that time, food protection developments seem to me like a kind of cat and mouse game, with corporate lobbyists looking for loopholes or trying different approaches to bend the public will. But ultimately, this episode shows who really has the power in such situations. We do – ordinary people – as long as we are prepared to use it.

Natalie is attending ‘ The Better Way’ conference in Bath, which Alex Krainer is speaking at, organised by ‘The World Council for Health’. World Council for Health to Host Better Way Conference in Bath, UK 2-4 June 2023. The Better Way Conference is a three-day event taking place in Bath, Seven Principles of a Better Way 1. We act in honour and do no harm We do our best to live by this law, and enact the principles within this charter by it. 2. We are free beings with free will We take responsibility for, and control of, our lives, our choices and our health. 3. We are part of nature We recognise that the well-being of people and planet are interdependent and we nurture both in equal measure. 4. Spirituality is integral to our well-being People are spiritual and we thrive when life has conscious meaning and higher purpose. 5. We thrive together We are inclusive and value our diverse, integrated, and collaborative community. 6. We value different perspectives We celebrate respectful discussion as the means to ever more refined knowledge, compassion and wisdom. 7. We use technology with discernment We recognise technology used respectfully will enhance learning and wisdom to benefit people and planet.

Who is ‘privatised UN’ WEF boss Klaus Schwab? Natalie Minnis explains how we know his family fortune was made in WWII on the back of Ravensburg concentration camp slave labour. Schwab Family Values – Is the real Klaus Schwab a kindly old uncle figure wishing to do good for humanity, or is he really the son of a Nazi collaborator who used slave labour and aided Nazi efforts to obtain the first atomic bomb? Johnny Vedmore investigates. Back in the Escher-Wyss factory in Ravensburg, Eugen Schwab had been busy putting forced labourers to work at his model Nazi company. During the years of World War II, nearly 3,600 forced labourers worked in Ravensburg, including at Escher Wyss. According to the city archivist in Ravensburg, Andrea Schmuder, the Escher-Wyss machine factory in Ravensburg employed between 198 and 203 civil workers and POWs during the war. Karl Schweizer, a local Lindau historian, states that Escher-Wyss maintained a small special camp for forced labourers on the factory premises. The use of masses of forced labourers in Ravensburg made it necessary to setup one of the largest recorded Nazi forced labour camps in the workshop of a former carpenter’s at Ziegelstrasse 16. At one time, the camp in question accommodated 125 French prisoners of war who were later redistributed to other camps in 1942. The French workers were replaced by 150 Russian prisoners of war who, it was rumoured, were treated the worst out of all the POWs. One such prisoner was Zina Jakuschewa, whose work card and work book are held by the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum. Those documents identify her as a non-Jewish forced labourer assigned to Ravensburg, Germany, during 1943 and 1944. Eugen Schwab would dutifully maintain the status quo during the war years. After all, with young Klaus Martin Schwab having been born in 1938 and his brother Urs Reiner Schwab born a few years later, Eugen would have wanted to keep his children out of harm’s way. Klaus Martin Schwab – International Man of Mystery Born on 30 March 1938 in Ravensburg, Germany, Klaus Schwab was the eldest child in a normal nuclear family. Between 1945 and 1947, Klaus attended primary school in Au, Germany. Klaus Schwab recalls in a 2006 interview with the Irish Times that:”After the war, I chaired the Franco-German regional youth association. My heroes were Adenauer, De Gasperi and De Gaulle.” Klaus Schwab and his younger brother, Urs Reiner Schwab, were both to follow in the footsteps of their grandfather, Gottfried, and their father, Eugen, and would both initially train as machine engineers. Klaus’s father had told the young Schwab that, if he wanted to make an impact on the world, then he should train as a Machine Engineer. This would only be the beginning of Schwab’s University credentials.

Mutiny erupts among WEF staff over role of ‘Mr Davos’ Founder and chair Klaus Schwab has run forum for 52 years but is now seen by some past and present staff as ‘a law unto himself’ The future of Klaus Schwab – Mr Davos for more than half a century – has become a talking point at this year’s meeting after World Economic Forum employees voiced strong criticism of their chair and the lack of a succession strategy. A group of current and former WEF staff members who contacted the Guardian said the 82-year-old Schwab was a law unto himself and had surrounded himself with “nobodies” who were incapable of running the organisation he founded in the early 1970s. “Klaus has been at the helm of the WEF for 52 years. When he was born [in 1938] 122 of the 195 states in the world right now did not even exist. He is completely unaccountable to anyone inside and outside the organisation,” the group said. “We are a group of current and former employees of the WEF. We want to play our role in fostering debate about the role this organisation plays in the world.” The group said it wanted to remain anonymous. “We are hesitant to come forward as Klaus is very well connected and can make life very difficult for us even after we leave the WEF.” Speculation about Schwab’s future has intensified this week after a piece on the online publication Politico said the WEF’s strategic partners – the firms that bankroll the $390m (£315m) a year business – were unhappy about the lack of a succession strategy. The group of WEF staff members said they had posted their criticisms on the social media platform LinkedIn but they had been removed at the request of the WEF, something the organisation denies. The posts, shared with the Guardian, said: “There isn’t much of a future for the WEF beyond Klaus not just because there isn’t a clear successor but also because his managing board is such a viper’s nest that senior leadership will be at each other’s throats the moment the old man pops off.” A WEF spokesperson said: “The board of trustees decides any future institutional leadership appointments. The forum has a strong institutional governance structure in place to ensure its continued ability to fully support its mission.” Former UK prime minister Tony Blair is one of the leading international figures who has been linked with the role.

Natalie Minnis on Scottish mountaineering: Munros (over 3,000ft), Corbetts (2,500-3,000ft), Grahams (2,000-2,500ft) and Donalds (lowland hills over 2000ft) – Natalie Minnis – Ironically it was a health issue that triggered my hillwalking and climbing obsession. I used to run regularly, but I developed symptoms of an underactive thyroid, and found that I was no longer able to run for more than 20 minutes. Instead, I started going for long walks. I joined a Meetup group (Meetup.org) and I became an organiser, with the specific intention of posting easier hill walks that someone as unfit as myself would be able to do! After about a year of treatment, my thyroid problems improved and so did my fitness, quite suddenly. That was two years ago. I also started climbing, and I’m a hillwalking and climbing fanatic now. I recently did my Mountain Leader course, and I’m due to take my assessment soon. I used to think it was amazing that I met so many nice people in the hills. Now I realise that it’s because being out in the fresh air, in natural surroundings, puts people in a good mood.

Langley Park School for Boys, Nietzschean philosopher Nick Land: God, The Cairngorms and the Dark Enlightenment. Tony Gosling got to know an incredibly knowledgable ‘Nazi Nick’ Land at Langley Park grammar school in 1975 aged 13 and they struck up a friendship playing Diplomacy and SPI wargames every Saturday at Nicks home on the edge of Hayes Common. The pair sat next to each other in Maths and Physics also developing a shared interest in the study of the curious phenomenon of hallucinogenic drugs. Nick had an obsession with the US death and carnage in Vietnam and a ‘dark sense of humour’. In contrast he borrowed Tony’s hardback copies of Catholic writer and Jerusalem Bible translator JRR Tolkein’s Lord of The Rings. Along with two schoolfriends Tony and Nick spent a fortnight or so between their ‘O’ level exams and results wild camping around Wells, Somerset. But over the 1978 summer holidays. Nick ‘disappeared’ and in the new term starting ‘A’ levels at sixth form Nick had now become a Communist and took up with a new group of friends. Not long before they left Langley Park sixth form in 1980 Tony collared Nick at the bottom of the sixth form block stairs to ask a question which had been burning in his mind. After years of discussion about peace and war, right and wrong, left and right, did Nick think God existed or not? ‘Well’, said Nick, ‘Its in the balance isn’t it? I reckon about fifty-fifty’, then dashed upstairs. A few months later Tony pulled over into the Layham’s Road car park to open the envelope containing his ‘A’ level results. Before daring to look he offered up a heartfelt prayer that he didn’t want to go through the rest of his life not knowing whether God existed or not. A wrong decision might leave personal values upside-down as one sets out on life’s journey, an entire life wasted. At 18 years of age, in very personal moment between created and creator,whatever was in the envelope, he asked God to show him that he did indeed exist. As well as loving parents Christening new-borns, praying for spiritual protection of the innocents, all youngsters reaching the end of their teenage should be encouraged to reach out to God. It’s a biggie. Best to make the right decision at the outset.

Three months or so later Tony found himself on a pass in the Cairngorms in a sticky situation of his own making. With hindsight it was simply God’s answer to his prayer. From what began as a bright clear day with a good forecast the weather had come down so hard on the tops of the hills that Tony was shivering with cold and hypothermia, to far up to turn back and had lost the path in driving rain. It was late afternoon as he sat on a rock, shivering in thick cloud with the visibility at just a couple of feet. Tony prayed again, ‘I’m too young to die. Please God if you’re out there, get me out of this’. A few minutes later, for fifteen seconds or so, the solid cloud parted and Tony saw a tiny hut about a quarter of a mile away. Triangulating on the sun which was almost lost in haze Tony was filled with hope and energy as he set off through marsh, through the River Dee, up a thirty foot rock face taking  best part of an hour to reach the hut inside which a Dutch couple were surprised to see him but had the fire going and he steamed through the night, sleeping fitfully with his back to the stone wall. God had answered young Tony’s question and prayer in a way it would not be easy to forget.

George Monbiot’s wife Rebecah Wrigley’s ‘Rewilding campaign’ turns sour in Germany – Al Jazeera – re wilding and wolf attacks. Clean Air Zones. ‘The wolf does not belong here’: German summit convened after animal attacks Farmers express concern for their livelihoods after series of deadly attacks on farm animals German farmers, conservationists and politicians have met at a wolf summit to discuss the animal’s future amid concerns that its population is out of control. The farmers’ union is calling for a relaxation of rules over when wolves, strictly protected under EU law, can be shot, after a series of highly publicised deadly attacks on farm animals. It has said that people in rural areas are fearful for their lives as well as the lives of their animals, with many farmers expressing concern for their livelihoods. Germany is home to an estimated 161 packs of wolves (of between eight to 12 animals each) according to the Federal Wolf Documentation and Advisory Office. A further 43 pairs and 21 individual animals were also registered. Numbers have increased year on year since the wolf was placed under species protection in 1990, after it was considered to have more or less become extinct at the end of the 19th century. The southern state of Bavaria has already taken its own decision to allow farmers to actively kill wolves where livestock is thought to be under particular threat.

Mark Purdey – consumer pressure to ban organophosphates. Pesticides. Please Save/Share: Mark Purdey organophosphate, big pharma, vaccines, immune system & allergies 2000: 1. Introduction 2. Why did BSE occur in the UK? 3. What are organophosphates? 4. What are the symptoms of organophosphate poisoning? 5. Effect on human health 6. Purdey’s battle 7. Consumer pressure 8. What can we do? BSE, CJD & MS? Organic Farmer Mark Purdey on Organophosphates Mark Purdey and Organophosphate (Film/Video, i-Contact, September 2001) Organic livestock farmer Mark Purdey was ordered in the 1980’s, along with all cattle and dairy farmers in the UK, to treat his cows with an organophosphate pesticide ‘Phosmet’ manufactured by I.C.I.. Organophosphates are derived from military nerve gas and a systemic treatment (the chemical enters the entire internal system of the cow) would undermine his organic principles so Mark refused to treat. “If Phosmet is proven to have caused BSE, the worldwide use of organophosphates (OPs) could be put into jeopardy, costing the chemical industry billions. The government know more than they’re letting on. They’ve stuck to the scrapie theory to placate people and give the impression they’ve got it under control.” Mark Purdey, Organic Dairy Farmer, Exmoor.

Natalie working in the media for Jackie Magazine at D.C. Thompson comics and subbing on the Sunday Mirror – Blast from the past: Jackie magazine Thankfully girls had a helping hand through those pimply, awkward years – Jackie magazine. The weekly publication was a teenage girl’s bible, with its combination of breathless pop news and teen advice. We swooned over interviews with Paul Young and Simon Le Bon, lapped up fashion and beauty tips and photo love stories; whilst agony aunts Cathy and Claire offered advice on those strange creatures, boys – (they counselled that you could tell what boys were like from the way they sat or the shape of their nose). Friends would tell me their brothers would sneak at a look at it too to get an idea how the female psyche worked. The first issue of Jackie was first published in 1964 and sold well for 20 years before a long-term decline in sales led to its closure in 1993. Maybe it began to look a bit tame and old-fashioned, but for those of us who were faithful readers Jackie will remain an important part chapter in our lives. 

Part Two – Ukraine/Covid/Climate Accelerationism Round-Up, With End Times Prophecy Reports

Alex Krainer, author of ‘The Grand Deception: Bill Browder and the Magnitsky Act’ and former hedge fund manager, joins Natalie, Tony and Martin. He is a speaker at ‘The Better Way’ conference, on freedom of speech. Being cancelled. Controlled narratives. Grand Deception: The Truth About Bill Browder, the Magnitsky Act and Anti-Russian Sanctions – Bill Browder, the false crusader for justice and human rights and the self-proclaimed No. 1 enemy of Vladimir Putin has perpetrated a brazen and dangerous deception upon the Western world. Mr. Browder uses all of the smarmy language, and all of the tricks of the worst and most vicious sort of CIA propaganda, as we have witnessed its development and application over the last 70 years: demonization and flat out lies, the aims of which are destabilization, chaos, mayhem and “regime change” in Russia. The extent to which intelligent people fall for Browder tales uncritically is astounding. Browder has been quashing any dissenting voices to his narrative: The Magnitsky Act ­ Behind the Scenes documentary by Andrei Nekrasov has not been shown because the Browder lawyers had basically attacked everybody involved in trying show it. Alex Krainer’s book The Killing of William Browder: Deconstructing Bill Browder’s Dangerous Deception (now titled Grand Deception: The Browder Hoax) is banned on both Amazon and Barnes and Noble without any due process. A highly intelligent, frank and entertaining take-down of one of the biggest hoaxes ever perpetrated on the US public and the world – The Magnitsky Act. Browder’s carefully cultivated and paid for image in the West (he was planning a movie about himself with the Weinstein brothers) is so at odds with the reality exposed here as to make up a kind of horror story effect out of Bram Stoker. Yet the way Alex Krainer tells it is both compelling and convincing. The thing is, no one else has looked at Browder’s story critically. It was accepted as fact, with no corroboration of any sort, by a gullible, and probably complicit, US political establishment. 

BBC Verify and The Integrity Initiative connected. Narratives failing. Troubling questions surround BBC ‘disinformation correspondent’ Marianna Spring Little is known about the history of Marianna Spring, the BBC’s first “disinformation correspondent.” But her record of churning out disinfo of her own in the service of British government objectives sends a bright red flag up over the new Verify project. The launch of BBC Verify, “a new brand to address the growing threat of disinformation and build trust with audiences by transparently showing how BBC journalists know the information they are reporting,” has raised questions about whether the British state broadcaster is ramping up plans to manufacture consent for official objectives while maligning dissent. The endeavor is said to be “a highly specialized team with a range of forensic and Open Source Intelligence (OSINT) capabilities that enable them to go beyond conventional newsroom techniques.” In all, 60 BBC journalists are involved – including the “specialist disinformation correspondent” Marianna Spring. The week after Verify’s rollout was announced, the 27-year-old Spring took to airwaves to acquaint BBC Breakfast viewers with her new venture. She explained its mission was to “verify video, factcheck, counter disinformation, and analyze really complex stories so we can get to the truth of what’s going on.” Standing before three interactive video screens, Spring outlined an array of investigative projects soon to appear under the auspices of Verify. They included an initiative employing “undercover accounts” which comprise a set of fake “characters” active on social media networks. The ostensible purpose of the sock-puppets created by Spring and her BBC associates is to “really understand polarization online and what’s happening on our social media feeds and what we’re being recommended and being pushed to us [sic] can affect all of us.” 

This is how the elite psychopaths view the rest of us: Yuval Noah Harari on the Second Industrial Revolution of robots and what will humans do. Fraudulent banking system. Al Jazeera – Schmit – AI could lead to human extinction. Will AI be another dot com bubble? Yuval Noah Harari: Once we know how to PRODUCE bodies and minds, what do we do with all the useless people? In all his intellectual quests, he must have missed one of the greatest writings, “Do nothing from selfish ambition or conceit, but in humility count others more significant than yourselves.” It’s always sad to see someone this far gone into their own nefarious and myopic vision of humanity. These types usually end up being what they wanted to destroy. Perhaps he can’t imagine he may someday be a very old man who has trouble eating and needs help.

Boris Johnson speech on new tech being like myth of Prometheus. AI to be regulated by those who developed it? Hype to encourage investment. New cancer blood test. The British prime minister Boris Johnson has delivered his inaugural speech to the UN General Assembly just hours after the UK supreme court found his advice to the Queen to prorogue parliament was unlawful. Speaking to a sparse audience late on Tuesday night about the challenges of technology, Johnson painted a dystopian view of the future of technology, asking: ‘AI – what will it mean? Helpful robots washing and caring for an ageing population? Or pink-eyed terminators sent back from the future to cull the human race?’ Pink-eyed terminators and limbless chickens: Boris Johnson’s UN speech in quotes PM uses his September 2019 General Assembly speech on the challenges of technology to paint a dystopian view – Johnson’s theme was the opportunities and challenges of technology and he ranged across a variety of subjects, from mattresses that can monitor your nightmares to a diet of “terrifying limbless chickens”. Here is a selection of his quotes: “In the future, voice connectivity will be in every room and almost every object: your mattress will monitor your nightmares; your fridge will beep for more cheese.” “A future Alexa will pretend to take orders. But this Alexa will be watching you, clucking her tongue and stamping her foot.” “You may keep secrets from your friends, from your parents, your children, your doctor – even your personal trainer – but it takes real effort to conceal your thoughts from Google.” “AI – what will it mean? Helpful robots washing and caring for an ageing population? Or pink-eyed terminators sent back from the future to cull the human race?” “What will synthetic biology stand for – restoring our livers and our eyes with miracle regeneration of the tissues, like some fantastic hangover cure? Or will it bring terrifying limbless chickens to our tables?” “When Prometheus brought fire to mankind. In a tube of fennel, as you may remember, that Zeus punished him by chaining him to a Tartarean crag while his liver was pecked out by an eagle. And every time his liver regrew the eagle came back and pecked it again. And this went on forever – a bit like the experience of Brexit in the UK, if some of our parliamentarians had their way.” 

Bilderberg’s Chatham House Rules: Subjects covered in Bilderberg are plastered all over the Press afterwards. Talk TV, Mike Graham show – Baroness Claire Fox on exaggerated existential threat of AI. One Reason Why The Existential Threat Of AI May Be Overblown Critics of AI frequently use the example of AIs striving to amass significant wealth or resources, and—by assumption—they regard this as detrimental. However, this perspective could be skewed by an underlying antagonism toward capitalism and wealth creation, both of which have historically fueled human progress. If a superintelligent AI sought to maximize its wealth and was also programmed with reasonable restrictions such as “act within the confines of existing law,” and “accumulate resources only by satisfying consumer or investor needs,” it’s unclear why an AI accumulating resources should cause any alarm. Capitalism has long faced criticism about a general tendency toward monopolization, so maybe the real concern here is monopoly. However, apart from a few exceptions, competition has largely dominated over monopoly in capitalist economies. Already, we’re witnessing significant competition in the AI space, and there is little reason to think this won’t continue. Thus, even if superintelligent AIs aspire to acquire as many resources as they can, so long as they operate within legal boundaries (modifiable by humans as circumstances require) and aim to satisfy consumer and investor demands, their operation might largely parallel traditional business activities in a market. While this scenario might not sit well with communists and socialists, for those of us who appreciate the benefits of markets, production, and businesses competing to satisfy consumer demands, superintelligent AIs could well be a catalyst for economic growth rather than a harbinger of the apocalypse. So the question arises: why create unnecessary new bureaucratic structures and licensing regimes if the little we know so far about AI development provides so little reason to worry about existential threats? According to Eliezer Yudkowsky, the onus is on those who are skeptical of AI posing existential risk to disprove his theory. However, the burden of proof works in the opposite direction. Unsupported claims of potential dangers, especially sensational ones, require substantiation before gaining credibility. Notwithstanding the attention-grabbing headlines, a deeper dive into the AI doomsday narratives suggests little cause for concern. Rather than descending into pandemonium, the innate tendencies of superintelligent AIs may lead to convergence on practices beneficial to humanity. While ensuring the ethical and safe development of AI deployment is crucial—and already happening to a significant extent—overly restrictive regulations will hamper the technology’s potential to drive economic growth and societal progress. In short, the burden of proof lies with the doomsayers. Their claims that we are all going to hell in a handbasket should be met with healthy skepticism until solid evidence proves otherwise. All in all, based on what we know about AI and existential risk, we have more reasons for optimism than pessimism. 

AI is not so good at lying as politicians and mass media journalists are. Chat GPT essay on Ukraine war was favourable to Russia. ChatGPT outlines 8-point solution for ongoing Russia-Ukraine war; Shashi Tharoor reacts OpenAI’s chatbot, ChatGPT has gained quite traction on social media in the past few months, thanks to its smart and informed responses to practically every question submitted to it by users. With the AI-powered chatbot taking the world by storm, it has got almost everyone including those in classrooms, boardrooms, and even social media. Amid all the queries, no one would have thought about ChatGPT giving a solution to the ongoing Russia-Ukraine war. Former Indian foreign secretary and writer Vikas Swarup is the one who went on to ask the AI bot to come up with a plan to resolve the war and guess what? The chatbot drafted an 8-point solution that can be implemented to bring the war to an end. From decentralising power in the Russian-speaking regions to international monitoring of the agreements implemented following the negotiations, the ChatGPT-generated response looks quite impressive and got the internet talking. It also caught the attention of Congress MP Shashi Tharoor who reshared the screenshot of the response, calling it an “interesting experiment.” “Interesting initiative by Vikas Swarup, but as he knows, in conflicts leaders are irrational in ways beyond AI’s comprehension! In this specific case I can think of several objections from both sides, mainly the Russians, to the ChatGPT formulation. But it’s a great experiment!”, he wrote. Former Indian diplomat asks if AI can solve the world’s biggest conflict The former Indian diplomat while taking to Twitter shared a screenshot of the response generated by ChatGPT asking if the AI bot can come up with a mediation plan for the Russia-Ukraine War. In a detailed plan for the same, ChatGPT noted that the Russia-Ukraine war is a “complex and long-standing issue” to which finding a solution that is acceptable to both parties is a “challenging task.” It further suggested certain ideas including Negotiations, Ceasefire, Decentralisation, International Monitoring, Economic Assistance, Recognition of the Sovereignty of Ukraine, Cultural Protection, and finally Military Withdrawal. 

Yulia on drone attacks on Moscow. Ukraine join NATO? WW3? Drones Strikes In Moscow – Missile Strikes In Ukraine Today the Russian government revealed some numbers and information about its ‘Special Military Operation’. Today’s ‘clobber report’ by the Ministry of Defense leads with this: During the day, the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation carried out group strikes using long-range high-precision air-launched weapons at central decision-making points where, under the guidance of specialists from Western intelligence agencies, terrorist acts were planned on Russian territory. All assigned objects are hit. ‘Central decision-making points’ are ministries and main headquarters. These had so far not been targets. Shoigu also spoke of targets of the recent drone attacks in Ukraine: “The deliveries of equipment and weapons to Ukraine are increasing. We monitor the volumes and routes of supply and, if identified, strike. In recent days, large warehouses of Western weapons in Khmelnytsky, Ternopil and Nikolaev have been destroyed, the American Patriot anti-aircraft missile system in Kyiv has been hit,” the Minister of Defense said. “The military support of Ukraine only delays the hostilities, but cannot affect the outcome of the special military operation,” the head of the military department is sure. On today’s drone strikes in Moscow he said (machine translation): “This morning, the Kiev regime carried out a terrorist act in the Moscow region. I will note, on civilian objects. It involved eight aircraft-type unmanned aerial vehicles. They are all amazed. In Moscow, three drones were suppressed by electronic warfare, lost control and deviated from their intended targets. Five more were shot down in the Moscow region by the Pantsir anti-aircraft missile and gun system, the Minister of Defense said. Other people had claimed up to 20 drones. But there was little damage and no reports of any casualties.       Putin Admits Moscow’s Air Defenses “Need Work” After Multi-Drone Attack Russian officials are describing the complex drone attack as the most serious assault on Moscow since World War II. President Vladimir Putin admitted today that Moscow’s air defense system still needs work to counter drone attacks, like the one that struck the Russian capital this morning. Russian authorities described the attack as the worst to hit the capital since the launch of the full-scale invasion of Ukraine, with some claims that it was the worst since World War II. Meanwhile, in Ukraine, Kyiv came under drone attack, too, with Russia launching three waves of strikes in the space of just 24 hours. In an article from Zvezda, the official organ of the Russian Ministry of Defense, Putin said that “The air defense system of Moscow worked normally, satisfactorily. Although there is something to work on,” he admitted. Putin admitted that similar difficulties in dealing with drones had been encountered at Khmeimin Air Base, the Russian outpost in Syria, which came under drone attack on multiple occasions. Putin also stated that “It is understood what needs to be done to strengthen the capital’s air defense, and we will be doing so.”

https://twitter.com/KitKlarenberg/status/1536321965404762112?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1536321965404762112%7Ctwgr%5Ee35e82b379abe0f578ea80b635f3f77e5c88da7e%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fthegrayzone.com%2F2023%2F05%2F30%2Fjournalist-kit-klarenberg-british-police-interrogated-grayzone%2F

Investigative journalist Kit Klarenberg from The Grayzone arrested in cynical fishing operation. British police detain journalist Kit Klarenberg, interrogate him about The Grayzone British counter-terror police detained journalist Kit Klarenberg upon his arrival at London’s Luton airport and subjected him to an extended interrogation about his political views and reporting for The Grayzone. As soon as journalist Kit Klarenberg landed in his home country of Britain on May 17, 2023, six anonymous plainclothes counter-terror officers detained him. They quickly escorted him to a back room, where they grilled him for over five hours about his reporting for this outlet. They also inquired about his personal opinion on everything from the current British political leadership to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. At one point, Klarenberg’s interrogators demanded to know whether The Grayzone had a special arrangement with Russia’s Federal Security Bureau (FSB) to publish hacked material. During Klarenberg’s detention, police seized the journalist’s electronic devices and SD cards, fingerprinted him, took DNA swabs, and photographed him intensively. They threatened to arrest him if he did not comply. Klarenberg’s interrogation appears to be London’s way of retaliating for the journalist’s blockbuster reports exposing major British and US intelligence intrigues. In the past year alone, Klarenberg revealed how a cabal of Tory national security hardliners violated the Official Secrets Act to exploit Brexit and install Boris Johnson as prime minister. In October 2022, he earned international headlines with his exposé of British plans to bomb the Kerch Bridge connecting Crimea to the Russian Federation. Then came his report on the CIA’s recruitment of two 9/11 hijackers this April, a viral sensation that generated massive social media attention. Among Klarenberg’s most consequential exposés was his June 2022 report unmasking British journalist Paul Mason as a UK security state collaborator hellbent on destroying The Grayzone and other media outlets, academics, and activists critical of NATO’s role in Ukraine. Because Klarenberg’s reporting on Mason relied heavily on leaked emails, Mason falsely accused him of “assisting a Russian state-backed hack-and-leak disinformation campaign.” Mason has also reported the leak of his emails to the British police. Emma Briant, a self-styled disinformation expert who participated in Mason’s campaign to sabotage NATO critics, dispatched lawyers to demand Klarenberg remove all of his articles that mention her from the internet. The lawyer letters also threatened costly super injunctions to prevent further reporting, and challenged the “authenticity” of the emails’ content. The cease-and-desist letters additionally leveled false and defamatory allegations against Klarenberg, including that he was personally involved in hacking her email and Twitter account.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/Tvd3lqKHVr6i/

Dr Rashid Butar, April 2020, on Gain of Function research and internet blocking him. What has been learnt from pandemic? Final Dr. Rashid Buttar interview. With Laura-Lynn Tyler. On God, Covid, CNN & TV Truths! Dr. Rashid Buttar Dies of Apparent Heart Attack, Leaving Medical Freedom Community in Shock, but Undeterred (Videos) “They can’t take my name. They can’t take my degree. They can’t take my knowledge out of my head. They can’t take anything from me. The only thing they can take is my life, and if they take my life, that’s ok, then I become a martyr.” —Dr. Rashid Buttar (Interview here, go to 13:00 mark.) Yesterday morning, I received the shocking news that Dr. Rashid Buttar had died, within a few days of saying he had been, by his estimate, “deliberately poisoned,” following an explosive CNN interview a year ago. I didn’t know him, but felt I did. I spent much of yesterday listening to his broadcasts and interviews. A source told me this morning that Buttar is said to have died of a heart attack and that his partner has Tweeted there was no foul play involved. (I can’t find that Tweet.) Yesterday, Charlene Bollinger sent out a statement that the family is asking for privacy at this time. In this interview, Dr. Buttar speaks of mysterious deaths, including Kary Mullis and Luc Montagnier, and addresses his own targeting for potential assassination. He also spoke of both a remedy that reverses cancer that he’d worked in for many years, a remedy that he said could stop deaths from covid shots. “It’s going to save hundreds of thousands of lives of those who have already taken the vaccine,” he says.

Radio4All download pages
COMPLETE SHOW AND FULL INTERVIEWS
[right click to download]
#1 – Complete 3hr 20min show – [right click to download]
Full interviews with…
#2 – RIP Dr Rashid Buttar w Laura-Lynn Tyler his last interview May 2023 – 00:30:00
#3 – Jennifer Bilek – TRANS AGENDA who funds it w James Patrick – 00:40:00

 

BCfm’s weekly Politics Show presented by Tony Gosling with Irish Republican Labour activist Martin Summers was forced off FM, now online only by station manager Pat Hart, ‘rested due to the pandemic’ on 24 March 2020. Bristol Community FM (BCfm) charity ‘CEO’ Patrick Hart is a longtime personal friend of Bristol’s all-powerful right-wing ‘Labour’ mayor Marvin Rees. Now on Internet only NOT The BCfm Politics Show is available 17:00-c. 21:00 live on Fridays. Pat Hart replaced us with an inane student show repeating MSM stories called The Bristol Agenda. If you’d like to share your views on his deliberate dumbing-down and pro-Covid jab mismanagement you can contact UK broadcasting regulator Ofcom or BCfm board chair and the ‘Don’ himself, here.

February 2019 Ofcom complaint result: UKLFI exposed as creation of Israeli foreign ministry – Bristol Post article: BCfm cleared after being reported to Ofcom for anti-semitic conspiracy theories