Reform UK support Ukraine and Israel wars – Nikola Dragovic, award-winning Serbian film director on Ratco Mladic (1942-2026), defender of Bosnian Serbs – Educated guesswork on CIA chief John Ratcliffe secret trip to Moscow – How Nazi spy chief Reinhard Gehlen was secretly recruited by the US military and made West Germany’s intelligence chief – The Bristol Politics Show, presented by Tony Gosling
MP3 of Friday 28th August 2026 show [right click to download]
(from c. 11pm) This week’s full interview mp3s, bottom of page. SHOW STARTS 17:00 London time FOR c. 4 HRS TO c. 20:50 – OUR LIVE STREAM to Listen live online. Alt. live stream, DJ Plug Radio OR Download Show After Transmission HERE. Repeats 11 & 5 AM & PM daily on our stream
Download NOT THE BCFM POLITICS SHOW APP [ANDROID APP (1)] and [APKPURE (2)] – or the [Apple App store] – PS. You can replace evil Google Play, which effectively banned us, with [the Aurora store]
All time low: 31% trust the UK Press – UK media oligopoly TONY’S BOOKS: Bilderberg.org – 2 PAPER–BACKS – TONY’S CHANNELS: Telegram – Bitchute – 911 forum – Radio4All – The Land Is Ours – VK – Twitter/X – Farcebook – Brighteon – Rumble – RT Live on Rumble – Goebbelsesque YouTube: This show; Public Enquiry; Peter Borenius; i-Contact & Occult Geopolitics
Radio4All mp3 audio files usually available from 23:00 2-4hrs, after TX – we’ll credit you if you rebroadcast. Any probs. mp3s should be on alternative links below by then
Paul McDonnell from Reform, Wells and Mendip Hills, joins Tony and Martin online. Problems with UK – finances, universities, housing, health. COVID group think – lockdowns, jabs good – including celebrity endorsement. Paul MacDonnell was the head of European policy at the Center for Data Innovation, an affiliate of the Information Technology and Innovation Foundation. Prior to joining the Center, MacDonnell represented Insurance Ireland, the insurance industry trade association, in Dublin and Brussels, and managed the industry’s response to policy, legislative, and regulatory developments. MacDonnell began his career with Hill & Knowlton’s government affairs division in London where he provided advice to a number of Fortune-500 companies. In 2001 he cofounded an economic policy forum in Dublin, Open Republic, which, as well as hosting events aimed at policymakers and politicians on such issues as pensions, taxation and the EU, was the Irish publisher of the Economic Freedom of the World Report. MacDonnell has extensive broadcast and print media experience, and he holds a degree in medieval English literature and philosophy from Trinity College Dublin and an M.B.A. from University College Dublin. General Election 2024: Reform candidate calls Tories ‘destructive left wing organisation’ Paul MacDonnell, who is standing in North East Somerset and Hanham, says the Conservatives were “certainly to the left of the Labour Party of the 1970s The Reform candidate standing against Jacob Rees-Mogg has called the Conservatives a “destructive left wing organisation.” Article continues below Paul MacDonnell, who is standing in North East Somerset and Hanham, told the Local Democracy Reporting Service he is a “dispassionate conservative” and an “anti-authoritarian.” He said he decided to stand for Reform UK because he thinks the government has given power away to unelected organisations, such as the courts. He added that was concerned about “growing authoritarianism” within organisations. He said: “We have people in human resources departments setting out protocols and policies which are increasingly dominating people’s working lives and in fact can become instruments of bullying around their political opinions if you are forced into diversity, equality, inclusion dogmas that organisations are now promoting.” He also thinks that free speech has been restricted in Britain, adding: “I’m opposed to hate speech laws.” Based in Wells, Mr MacDonnell’s background is in think tanks on public policy. He said: “Policy in Britain is just not made that well. We need to consult think tanks and people like that, and people who study problems.” He said that standing for Parliament and speaking to voters had been “amazing” for someone interested in public policy. He said: “It’s a fairly humbling experience because you realise no matter how well read you are about something or how firm your views, when you encounter people, you realise that’s the fundamental data you are dealing with of people’s lives…
Did Dolly Parton die from a turbo-cancer from the experimental Moderna MRna jab she helped finance? She was a great singer songwriter, but maybe shouldn’t have endorsed experimental jabs. well hey it’s me i’m finally going to get my vaccine i’m so excited i’ve been waiting a while i’m old enough to get it and i’m smart enough to get it so i’m very happy that i’m going to get my modernist shot today and i wanted to tell everybody i think you should get out there and do it too i haven’t changed one of my songs to fit the occasion it goes vaccine vaccine vaccine vaccine i’m begging of you please don’t hesitate vaccine vaccine vaccine vaccine cause once you’re dead then that’s a bit too late here i go all right i think you got it i got it okay i didn’t hurt just stung a little bit but that was from the alcohol pad i think yeah right okay all right now mess up my beauty mark okay i’m joking you do what you got to do i don’t want blood on my clothes you
Russia threatening to bomb UK. Restore UK, Henry Bolton, Security – British foreign policy. Police arresting Palestine Action protesters but not thieves. Tokenism – racism, sexism. Russia threatens to bomb UK military bases over support for Ukraine Russia warns Britain is ‘playing with fire’ by supplying Storm Shadow missile technology to Ukraine Russia has warned it could strike British military targets over the UK’s support for Ukraine. Russia’s foreign ministry spokesperson told the UK to back off on what she called London’s hostile stance on the war, which she said risked taking the conflict to an entirely new level. Maria Zakharova told the same Moscow news briefing earlier that Britain and France were “playing with fire” by supplying sensitive missile technology to Ukraine. But the Ministry of Defence has hit back, saying Russia “should be in no doubt about the resolve of this government to stand against Russian aggression, in Ukraine and against the UK and our allies.” Britain announced on Monday it would allow Kyiv access to classified technology to start its own production of Storm Shadow long-range cruise missiles, capable of carrying out strikes deep within Russia. France has already given its assent to licence the technology for the European missile. That decision has drawn strong condemnation from Russia, with president Vladimir Putin’s spokesperson Dmitry Peskov saying it would add “fuel to the fire” of the conflict. But Andy Burnham told reporters in Kyiv during a visit earlier this week: “Who started the fire? That’s the question, isn’t it?” Russian intervention comes as tensions between the Kremlin and Downing Street continue to escalate, a week after Russia’s embassy in the UK said reports that Ukrainian forces had used unmanned aircraft manufactured by two UK companies “confirm that London is deliberately opting for an escalation of the Ukraine crisis”. But former ministers have said Mr Burnham must not flinch in the face of the threats. Former foreign secretary Sir Malcolm Rifkind told The Independent: “This is probably usual sabre-rattling from Russia. “It is not impossible they might try a significant cyber attack or something military to appear macho. If they do, they should remember that the UK has offensive cyber capability and could use it!” Former defence secretary Grant Shapps said: “The real Russian threat to this country is not a missile over Hertfordshire – it is sabotage, cyberattacks and hybrid operations against our defence industry, our undersea cables and our critical national infrastructure, deniably and by proxy. That is where ministers must harden our defences now, not after the fact. “The answer to intimidation has never been to back away from it. If London flinched every time Moscow rattled the sabre, the sabre would simply be rattled more often, and next time over Poland or the Baltics.
Russia is poised to attack Britain and has identified drone factory and missile company as ‘legal targets’, ex-Kremlin chief warns – as he describes the UK as ‘evil number one’ : I fear Putin WILL fire a nuclear weapon… but not at one of Nato’s allies Russia is poised to attack Britain – and has singled out a drone factory and a missile company as ‘legal targets’, it was claimed last night. A senior adviser to Vladimir Putin warned that the ‘highest levels of the Russian government’ were considering a ‘hybrid attack’, such as sabotage or arson, rather than an ‘outright military strike’ that would unleash a response from Nato. In an exclusive interview with The Mail on Sunday, Andrei Fedorov, a former deputy foreign minister of Russia, described the UK as ‘evil number one’. Among the Kremlin’s targets is a drone factory owned by a British-Ukrainian firm, Ukrspecsystems. Details of the company’s premises next to RAF Mildenhall, in West Suffolk, were made public in April alongside five other European firms that make weapons and drones for Ukraine in its war against Russia. On Saturday night, Defence Secretary Wes Streeting said: ‘The reckless rhetoric and attempts at intimidation we have seen from the Kremlin in recent weeks reflects the weakness of Putin’s position and we will not be intimidated. ‘This has been a bad year for Putin. The front line has barely moved. Russian casualties continue to mount. The Russian people are paying a heavy price for Putin’s war. ‘It is also in our national interest that Putin’s aggression must not be rewarded. The Prime Minister, the Foreign Secretary and I are working together to mobilise support for Ukraine ahead of winter.’ The threat comes as: Bosses of British defence companies have been warned they could be targets of Russian hybrid attacks; A pro-Kremlin war channel suggested that a Nato base in Estonia with at least 900 British troops should be attacked; One of the assassins of Russian defector Alexander Litvinenko plans to hold an anti-UK exhibition opposite the British embassy in Moscow; Britain’s ambassador to Russia told officials not to confirm if British weapons are going to Ukraine to prevent an escalation by Putin. On Saturday, Elisabeth Braw, an expert on the Atlantic Council thinktank, said that the point of hybrid attacks is that they put a country like the UK in a dilemma about how to respond. She said: ‘I call hybrid threats the defender’s dilemma because it really is the defender’s dilemma. ‘How exactly are you supposed to hit back because if you were to use military means, then you would really cause World War Three.’ Fedorov, 71, said that the Kremlin would not launch an outright military strike against Britain, a Nato member, because it could lead to the Western alliance launching a collective military response against Russia. But he added: ‘The UK is evil number one. After the information that UK-made drones were used against Russian oil refineries, this has become a big anger [sic] in Russian society. ‘Various experts are calling to punish by strike [sic] the UK, and it will be supported by the majority of Russian citizens.’ He said that Putin and his cronies were angry Andy Burnham had handed Ukraine blueprints for long-range Storm Shadow missiles, which have been used previously to strike inside Russia.
Gaza genocide or not? Reform UK says not. No war crimes in Gaza, says Nigel Farage’s Israel tsar Jason Pearlman is among several pro-Israel figures behind the party predicted to win big in May elections Israel has not committed a single war crime in Gaza, the head of the newly-formed Reform Friends of Israel has claimed. Speaking to Declassified, Jason Pearlman also described the torture and abuse of Palestinian detainees held in Israeli prisons as “the minutiae of individual claims”. Until December, Pearlman was a media adviser to Israel’s president, Isaac Herzog, who a UN commission found to have incited genocide. Speaking from Israel, where he still lives, he told Declassified that he started a conversation with Reform about turning the party’s ‘Friends of Israel’ group into a “full-time” organisation while he was still working for Herzog. “We did have a dinner with Nigel and some key backers,” he said. “We were able to put seed funding together.” Pearlman refused to say who Reform Friends of Israel’s (RFOI) donors were. But he admitted: “I’m sure some of the people who fund CFI [Conservative Friends of Israel] and LFI [Labour Friends of Israel] will also be funding RFI.” While Jason Pearlman remains an obscure figure in British politics, he stands to become one of the most influential figures on foreign policy, if Nigel Farage’s party wins the next election. He has said he has “great respect” for Benjamin Netanyahu, who is wanted by the International Criminal Court for war crimes. And, when his departure from Israeli politics was announced in December, he was personally thanked by President Herzog. “Jason has helped guide the Office of the President through perhaps Israel’s most challenging times with the international press,” Herzog said. “I am grateful for his tireless efforts to promote understanding of the work of the President of Israel and bring Israel’s story to millions around the world.” When Declassified asked Pearlman if he believed Israel had committed any war crimes since 7 October 2023, he said: “No, of course not.” He added: “The tragedy is that there is no nuance when it comes to discussing this conflict.” Declassified asked if he could think of a single specific case where he would condemn IDF soldiers in Gaza. Pearlman replied: “Probably… [but] I can’t think of anything specifically off-hand.” And when asked about the well-documented abuse and torture of Palestinian prisoners, Pearlman said: “I am sure there is some truth to all of these things…” But he appeared to dismiss such cases in favour of focusing on “the wider perspective of ‘how do we solve these issues?’”…
Should the UK be bombing Russian railways and oil refineries? Reform says yes. Is UK support for Ukraine worth it? Reform has switched position on Ukraine war, as getting more power. BBC Today programme – Andre Federof, Former Deputy Foreign Minister of Russia – Russians want Putin to bomb UK. Russia election 18th September – Putin set to win. Anti-Ukraine post from Reform supporter’s account was unofficial, says party Volodymyr Zelensky has said Ukraine is “ready for elections” if partners can guarantee security A social media post attacking Ukraine from a “Reform UK Alyn and Deeside and Wrexham” account was run by a party supporter with no official position in Reform, the party has said. The post, on Facebook, accuses Ukraine of corruption, says no more money or weapons should be sent to the country and calls for the lifting of sanctions against Russia. Reform said the account was “not official” and that the post was “contrary to our policy”. “We stand fully behind Ukraine against Russia’s brutal invasion,” a spokesperson added. The post, published on Monday, has been condemned by other political parties. The criticisms of Ukraine include labelling it “the most corrupt country on earth” and arguing that there should be no more sending of “money or weapons to the Zelensky regime”. There is also a call to “lift sanctions on Russia and restore normal diplomatic and trading relations”. Welsh Labour leader Ken Skates, a Fflint Wrecsam Senedd member, said he was “astonished” that “we’re seeing yet again Reform backing Putin’s invasion of Ukraine”. Reform leader Nigel Farage has been criticised for arguing that the West provoked the invasion. Two years ago he told BBC Panorama the war was “of course” Mr Putin’s fault, but that the expansion of the EU and Nato had given him a reason to tell the Russian people “they’re coming for us again”. Reform UK Alyn and Deeside and Wrexham is not an official account, says the party Conservative Sam Rowlands, another local MS, said it was a “disgraceful and deeply pro-Russian position from Reform UK” while “Putin continues his illegal war, including killing Ukrainian civilians.” “It is particularly concerning given Reform’s previous Welsh leader Nathan Gill was jailed for over 10 years after accepting illegal bribes to promote Russian interests.” Plaid Cymru Westminster Leader Liz Saville Roberts MP made a similar point, accusing Reform of taking a “stance as a pro-Russian party”. “Rewarding Putin’s aggression is no route to peace and stands in stark contrast to the values of solidarity and compassion we hold in Wales,” she added. Gill was sentenced, late last year, when Reform called his actions “reprehensible, treasonous and unforgivable”. He is thought to have received up to £40,000 to help pro-Russian politicians in Ukraine while he was a member of the European Parliament…
https://youtu.be/fo2GN5ZJtLk&t=22
BBC QT – Peter Hitchins on UK involvement in Ukraine war. The Heritage Party, David Kurten – what sets them apart. Those who feel disillusioned with the current political system, obviously, are right to do so. uh they have been systematically betrayed and I see no end to it. The there are so many issues uh which have been visited on this country by an elite of self- selecting closed-minded people are well represented here this evening and actually largely incompetent as well uh which have done enormous damage to our way of life. So for instance, who now has anything to say about the de-industrialization of this country and the destruction of manufacturing jobs under the Thatcher government? Uh who can reverse it? Who can do anything about it? Who will say anything on this panel about the catastrophe of of mass immigration which has changed this country irrevocably to somewhere completely different from what it was. They won’t talk about it. They won’t talk seriously about the immense problems of crime and disorder which affect millions of people in their homes and leave them utterly vulnerable to all kinds of unpleasantness and and and violence and menace which they never used to have to undergo and and and there is no sense whatsoever that there will be any reform of the criminal justice system or any attempt to put it right again. These are just some of the subjects which this elite on which this elite just constantly constantly refuse to discuss constantly refuse to discuss. Why? Why? Because they themselves have an ideology. They themselves have have the ideology of of of metropolitan bourgeois bohemians. They despise most people outside. What are you man of the people? They despise they despise. Well, I mean, you’re the only person on this panel. I’m no more a man of the people than you are. I don’t I don’t claim to be, but you’re making a I’m saying I’m I’m simply saying these are the things which they will not do anything about, which they will not because they themselves benefit. They themselves benefit from many of the things which which do immense damage. They’ve benefited from globalization. They’ve benefited from mass immigration. Talk about mass immigration. Talk about immigrants coming over here propping up our NHS treating us. They’re not affected. They’re not affected. Their ch their children their children don’t go to bog down comprehensives. Then they’re not affected. They’re not affected by they’re not affected. They’re not affected by crime. Yes, I do know what I’m talking about because I know what they do all the time. They will not discuss these things. They will not do anything about them. They ignore what you say. And you think that at general election time you can do something about it. No. The people who stand before you at general election time for for the for the political parties are people who’ve been pre-selected. You have no control. If I stood for parliament or if he stood for parliament from from our positions which are quite popular. The fact is the party machines would erase us the immense amounts of money they’re capable of spending the enormous access they have to the broadcasting organizations which we don’t have most of the time would make it impossible. Make it impossible more would make it impossible on the contrary would make it impossible for anyone. Sorry. What the question was, what would you say to people who feel like you clearly do political association? I just said it. Well, no, wait a moment. Wait a minute. What would you say to them about how to change things? Are you Are you Are you going to stand as an MP? I’m sorry. Are you Are you going to stand as an MP? No, because for the reasons I’ve just explained, I wouldn’t I wouldn’t have the faintest choice. No, my my advice to anybody young enough to do so is to immigrate before it’s too late.
Electoral Calculus, Martin Baxter- polls – Reform bounce has dissipated – hung parliament. Financial problems coming – AI bubble, wars. General Election Prediction Updated 28 July 2026 Current Prediction: Labour short 82 of majority Prediction based on opinion polls from 07 Jul 2026 to 27 Jul 2026, sampling 13,321 people. Probability of possible outcomes Lab minority 49% Reform minority 16% Con minority 11% Labour majority 10% No overall control 10% Reform majority 2% Conservative majority 1% Probability of being the largest party Labour 58% Reform 25% Conservative 16% The future is never certain. But using our advanced modelling techniques, we can estimate the probability of the various possible outcomes at the next general election. Minority government probabilities assume possible alliances between the Conservative and Reform parties, and between Labour, Liberal Democrats, SNP and Plaid Cymru. In the headline prediction table, the columns ‘Low Seats’ and ‘High Seats’ give the 90 per cent confidence interval for the number of seats won. Commentary for end-July 2026 A definite ‘Burnham bounce’ can be seen in the polling numbers this month. Labour have overturned Reform’s lead, which was 6pc last month, to edge just a fraction ahead. When translated into seats, this puts Labour ahead of the Conservative by over 100 seats, and pushes Reform into third place. Labour would be short of an overall majority, but is close to having a workable coalition with the Liberal Democrats and the Greens. These figures include adjustment for tactical voting, as described here. Also, Richard Rose this month says that Burnham Bowls a Googly to Reform UK.
Peter Hitchins at Oxford Union Debate – UK would rather go to war with Russia than lose Ukraine. And what did George W. Bush do?” He said, “We’re going to expand NATO into Ukraine.” Although he had been advised by his own ambassador in Moscow and a future CIA chief not to do this, he browbeat Angela Merkel of the Federal Republic of Germany and into supporting this ludicrous initiative and lo and behold, conflict and bitterness spread into Ukraine. Now, when I was in Moscow in the time of the fall of the Soviet Union, of course, I traveled down to Ukraine and you could see perfectly well that here was a country full of people who longed to be free of Soviet power and were very glad to have it out of their out of their lives. And for many, many years after this, it was a reasonably happy, reasonably prosperous, reasonably peaceful country. But once the NATO expansion spread towards it, once the idea became clear that it was to be used as a battering ram in some strange plan to create hostility when none existed, Ukraine began to divide between its east and its west between those in in Ukraine who who were who were fervent nationalists of the old western school and the people in the east who were more sympathetic to a close relation with Russia. And then there was an election in which a president Victor Yanukovic was elected and nobody disputes the result of this election and that president was the one given the moment of decision. The European Union came and said we’re offering you an association agreement and he said actually no thank you. It’s not good enough. It will threaten the people in the in the east who voted for me. He wouldn’t accept it. What happened to him? Do you know? You probably don’t. He was overthrown by an armed mob in one of the most disgraceful undemocratic actions in modern Europe European history. People who are rightly furious about Donald Trump’s mob marching into the US capital when he lost the election don’t even know what happened to Yanukovic. He was over he was offering at the time he was offering early elections and yet the mob overthrew him. The Ukrainian parliament then met broke all its own constitutional rules and removed him. And from then on Ukraine instead of being the happy, reasonably prosperous, contented policy which had been before and also the rather strikingly democratic policy in in in Eastern Europe ceased to be so and move towards a civil war. You might think you might think that the any vote you have tonight won’t have any effect. It won’t really not have any effect. We are already at war with Russia. Are you not aware of this? Do you not know that Western special forces have been in Ukraine for many years? Do you not know the huge piles of weapons which we supply to Ukraine which it couldn’t possibly afford on its own account? Do you know that we help them target their missiles on Russia? Of course you do. And why is Ukraine being chosen for this particular job? Precisely, ladies and gentlemen. Precisely, Madam President, because Ukraine is not in NATO and therefore the war can be pursued without any danger of it leading to a nuclear conflict. That is what is going on. The war is happening. And as for losing Ukraine, another small reminiscence, if I may, about 20 years ago, I went back to Moscow to see what was then the first the first military parade of the Russian armed forces since the end of the Soviet Union. And I watched it with my old friend Igor Mishv whose father had been a Soviet Navy nuclear submarine captain who knew his stuff about military matters. And we watched all this stuff trundling by. And at the end of it, he turned to me and said, “What do you think of our display of strategic scrap metal?” And he was right. The Soviet Union may have been military powerful in its time uh by its own standards. Russia is not a serious conventional military power. It’s one aircraft carrier can’t leave port without a target in case it breaks down and seems to burn vegetable oil to move. It’s it its navy is a is a comical comical display. Its army is drunken, illisiplined, and frankly disgraceful. And in four years of war, it hasn’t been able to take Karkov 20 miles from its border. And you think they’re going to arrive at Calala. The European NATO states already spend without any encouragement from Donald Trump three times as much on armaments as Russia does. And they spend it better and they have better armed forces. This is an imaginary threat. Why are we fighting this war? Fighting this war because of a a deep desire in certain American foreign policy circles to keep Russia down. And this is this is Adam braided in a in a document called the Wolawitz doctrine which I urge you to look up in which the whole idea was put forward that Russia could not be allowed to rise again…
RIP Ratco Mladic, Bosnian Serb general who faced down armed Croats & Muslims, Miodrag Zarkovic atco Mladic, former Yugoslav Colonel, known as ‘The Butcher of Bosnia’, dies in prison. C4 Lindsay Hilsum – Ratco saying it’s a NATO plot. Yugoslav war – complex. Nikola Dragovic, a Serbian film director who co-directed the acclaimed documentary ‘I Pledge’ (Zaklinjem Se) in 2020 – history of Ratco Mladic and Yugoslav war. Martin’s experience of working for CAFOD running up to Yugoslav war. NATOs operations in Yugoslav war. Milosavic killed, Praljak commits suicide in court live. Ratco Mladic was born in Bosnia. He was a Yugoslav citizen because that was part of Yugoslavia back then, but he was born in Boston actually in the middle in in the very central part of Bosnia. You you don’t get more Bosnian than his native town of Kalino. and u he was uh so all three sides are native of Bosnia. They they it was a classical civil war. It there there was no aggression from Serbia. Actually if there was aggression it was from the creation side because the Croatian army in at least two um examples uh invaded Bosnian territory at the beginning of the war in the early spring of 92. Uh so uh uh of all the three sides, not only that the servers were the only one to get the large portion of the blame, but I will now quote Indian General Satish Nambir. She was, I believe, for more than a year, the commander of the UN peacekeeping forces in Bosnia during the war, during the last stage of the war. and he wrote a public letter um if I recall correctly somewhere late in 95 so 31 years ago where he said we knew that all three sides were committing atrocities and war crimes but unlike Cros and Muslims Serbs were the only one who didn’t try to fool us to trick us to to to play dumb with us. So if he said in a letter, if we were if we found a village, Ser village or a corrupt village that was uh practically massacred by Boston forces and we knew that was that as a fact for a state of fact, you know, but when we would confront Bosnian army with that, they would no no we didn’t do it. If we were to find a Serb or a Muslim village that was massacred by creation forces and we confronted confronted creation forces forces with that fact, they were like, “No, no, no, we didn’t do it.” As opposed to that. If there was a creation or a Muslim village that was massacred by Serbs and we confronted Serbs about that, Serbs were like, “Maybe we did that.” So that’s another distinction between the Serbian side and the other two sides. Now as uh as for the hack tribunal, the hack tribunal officially brought up charges against Rad Kumadish who was the head commander commander-in-chief of the Bostonian Serb army and Radan Karaj who was the president of Republic of Serbska that’s the Serbian entity uh inside Boston. So uh uh the hack tribunal brought up official charges against the two of them in 96. I believe the main witness maybe even the only witness on that bringing up of the charges was Draan Erdo an ethnic who was also a mercenary and who fought somehow managed to fight for all three sides in the civil war. first for I believe uh Bostonian cross then for Bostonian mos Muslims and then at the end for Bostonian service when he surrendered to the hack tribunal and he surrendered not because he wanted to come clear with his conscience or whatever. No, he had some trouble with other mercenaries. He was even wounded in a gunfight. They were arguing over money of course
Don DeBar, journalist, joins Tony and Martin from New York. John Ratcliffe, CIA, goes to Moscow – why? Elections in US. Trump’s US. War with Iran. Secret CIA Visit to Moscow: Signal of an Immanent Coup vs. Trump? I wonder if the unannounced trip by the head of the CIA to visit the Kremlin signals that a coup is coming here in the US against Trump. Or, in other words, was the purpose of the trip for the CIA to assure the Kremlin that a removal of Trump from office would not signal an escalation of the Ukraine war – or that a first strike was about to begin – as a consequence? I believe the elite is divided on the tactical approach to the shared strategic goal of world domination. I believe Trump may represent one faction that would rather consolidate power in the Western Hemisphere first (e.g., disassemble the resistance to US power here) and then await a more favorable position in the international sphere, engaging from a position of unchallenged power. I think the rise of the East may be taking the sand out from under his feet, at least in the eyes of some parts of the other faction(s). During the (so called) Cuban Missile Crisis, Kennedy declined to make a rapid transfer of senior leadership (LeMay, et al) at the Pentagon, as some of his advisors suggested. The record show that he feared the Soviets would see this as a response to a coup attempt and decide that perhaps a first strike was coming, a very dangerous condition for all. If that’s the thinking among the top circles today, where the situation on the global stage is even more precarious and, by any measure, more dangerous, this trip would be one way of alleviating that possible interpretation of events if there were plans underway to do something that could seem unusual from the outside. The hasty removal of Trump, particularly after the recent bizarre staging of his shipping crate escapade and the various assassination attempt(s) and/or “plots” against him, would likely appear as unusual in their eyes.
Harley Schlanger, from Larouche in Potsdam, joins Tony and Martin. CIA roles and disagreements. Russia won’t attack UK. C4 News, Matt Frei – CIA/MI6 officer John Foreman – will Russia bomb UK? Harley Schlanger, a spokesman for the LaRouche movement and the Schiller Institute based in Potsdam, Germany. Schlanger engaged in a wide-ranging discussion on global geopolitics, which highlighted several key topics:Intelligence Agencies & Disagreements: He analyzed the evolving roles of the CIA, MI6, and Mossad, examining internal rifts and controversial ties (including references to the Epstein and Maxwell networks).Russia-UK Relations: Addressing heightened international tensions, Schlanger argued against mainstream claims, stating his view that Russia will not attack or bomb the UK.The Shift in Global Power: He detailed what he describes as the ongoing collapse of traditional European colonialism, leaving the global financial systems centered heavily around the City of London and Wall Street facing a systemic shift toward Eastern entities like China and Russia. Who Is Pushing for Nuclear War? International Peace Coalition, Week 168 Aug. 21—On August 21 the International Peace Coalition (IPC) held its 168th consecutive weekly meeting which Helga Zepp-LaRouche, founder of the Schiller Institute and initiator of the IPC said may be our most important meeting ever. Two regional wars threaten to go out of control, and the use of tactical nuclear weapons is now a topic for casual discussion. This has been recently confirmed by former U.S. Congresswoman Majorie Taylor Greene who said that she is not guessing when she says that there is an open discussion in the Pentagon, or in the President Donald Trump administration, of using tactical nuclear weapons, but rather she knows from direct sources that this is a live discussion. Elbridge Colby, the so-called “U.S. Under Secretary of War for Policy,” has confirmed on the record that the Pentagon is re-examining U.S. nuclear employment guidance in order to give the President what he calls “rational nuclear options” in a regional conflict with Russia or China—and he maintains that, unlike U.S. Nuclear Posture Reviews, this does not need to be approved by Congress or even be made public. Zepp-LaRouche said that President Trump should admit that he has lost the war in Iran, but instead he is vacillating between saying he is talking to the Iranians and saying there are no talks—most recently warning of crushing sanctions against Iran and any country working with them.
Ongoing collapse of European colonialism, just left with City of London and Wall St. CIA, MI6, Mossad – Epstein, Maxwell. Tech sector. China, Russia. …, Iran has survived 47 years of sanctions, and it is the United States which is bankrupt with the federal deficit now passing the $40 trillion mark. According to media reports, Iranian officials threatened to attack U.S. military bases in Europe if the U.S. intensifies the war. Israel continues the genocide in Gaza, but has been committing similar atrocities in the West Bank. But President Trump is unable or unwilling to control Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. The fighting in Ukraine is also escalating, but all of these wars are a consequence of the economic crisis, and the desire by western countries to maintain the 500-year-old colonial system of looting. Zepp-LaRouche stressed the urgency to circulate the letter which appeals to Pope Leo XIV to intervene by calling for a summit of global leaders to address the need of peace and nuclear disarmament. At least two former heads of state have already signed the letter. Ray McGovern, the retired CIA analyst and founding member of Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity (VIPS), said that he started the day this morning the same way he starts every morning—reading the news from EIR. He highly recommended that people read an article by Jason Ross. McGovern questioned how Elbridge Colby could even talk about changing official nuclear doctrines without first consulting with the Russians. McGovern said that he has been watching the Russians and the Soviets before them for over six decades, and said that the Russians are “an open book,” and make their nuclear policy crystal clear. Colby is “still wet behind the ears” with no experience and no understanding of what war is. McGovern used to brief Colby’s father on the Russians. Elbridge Colby wrote that he wants “nuclear superiority,” but McGovern said that this is not possible and that nobody will be superior in a nuclear war, which is why it is called “Mutually Assured Destruction.” McGovern stressed that President Trump is not well physically nor psychologically and could lead the world into a nuclear war either deliberately, accidentally, or by responding to an Israeli “false flag” provocation. This Israeli instigation is how President Trump started the Iran War. Iran controls the Strait of Hormuz which is the equivalent of holding a nuclear weapon. Would Trump respond with a nuclear weapon? Colonel Lawrence Wilkerson recently spoke on the Judging Freedom podcast where he said that the U.S. military leadership would not allow Trump to use nuclear weapons. McGovern said that he prays that Wilkerson is correct, but that there is no assurance. McGovern spoke of several near nuclear incidents such as in 1983 when Soviet Union radar indicated a missile attack, the Russian officer in charge [Lt. Col. Stanislav Petrov] refused to launch a counterattack, knowing that there was a technical problem with the radar system and that there was no threat. Another crisis in Nov. 1983 was averted when the CIA’s Mel Goodman—with whom McGovern said he was proud to work on Soviet foreign policy—bypassed all his superiors and went directly to CIA Director Bill Casey to warn that the White House had to stop ongoing western military exercises which were misunderstood in Moscow to be an attack on the Soviet Union. A third possible incident occurred when President Nixon had been drinking heavily and Kissinger warned military leaders that Nixon was inebriated and should he give orders to launch a nuclear strike the military leaders should first check with Kissinger. McGovern said that we are currently facing a level of danger that he has not seen since the 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis, and he again put the biggest concern on President Trump’s mental state.
Crypto Is Holding A Gun To Democracy! Gil Duran, author of ‘Nerd Reich’, on no criticism of billionaires backing tech. Data centres. Crypto is holding a gun to democracy Gil Duran For years, Donald Trump called crypto a “scam.” Now he’s a crypto billionaire—and the crypto bro-in-chief. Earlier this week, I joined Prem Thakker of Zeteo for a conversation about how crypto fascists are funding the most corrupt White House in American history. The Nerd Reich: Silicon Valley Fascism and The War On Democracy is officially a national bestseller. But this is just the beginning of the fight. Many major news outlets still refuse to touch this subject, and we need to change that. A cult of billionaires is chasing a self-fulfilling prophecy of societal collapse, and they are buying tremendous influence over our government. The people deserve to know. Publishers Weekly: “This transfixing debut from journalist Durán investigates the antidemocratic ideologies espoused by tech billionaires linked to the second Trump administration … It’s an ominous look at an insular elite arrayed against American democracy.” “Gil Durán is an essential voice on this technofascist moment—where it comes from and where we are going.” —Carole Cadwalladr, investigative journalist, The Nerve “A clear and compelling account of the threats posed by technofascism to democracies everywhere.” —Ruth Ben-Ghiat, historian and author of Strongmen: Mussolini to the Present “Reader take note: Gil Durán is a deep, thoughtful, and expansive observer of events that shape the current and future of our American democracy.” —George Lakoff, author of The All New Don’t Think of an Elephant!: Know Your Values and Frame the Debate “The Nerd Reich is a clarion warning about the rise of techno-fascist sociopaths who seek to profit off of our collective misery. In clear, compelling and meticulously-researched detail, Gil Durán sounds the alarm about this incestuous cabal of broligarchs. He brings the receipts and the righteous rage.” —Wajahat Ali, The Left Hook
The Secret Of Data Centres Revealed: Digital Slavery? Catherine Austin Fitts – everyone will be controlled by ‘Stablecoin’ – Genius to pay off government debt. If you and I do a transaction and I want to buy a Tucker Carlson hat and you want to sell it to me, I give you cash, I get the hat. That’s a two lock transaction. You have a lock. I have a lock. If one of us says no, it can’t happen. Okay. Let’s say we have money in the bank and I want to buy the hat. I’m going to transfer money. I’ll do an a to you for the cost of the hat. The bank has rules from the Treasury Department. It has sanctions. It has to know your customer rules. It has other regulations. And it has the ability to intercede and stop the transaction for those reasons. Okay? and and that’s a sort of what I call a manual third lock. So they the bank gets a third lock implementing the government regulations. Um and so if you look at what happened to the truckers in Canada, they had all not all but most of the banks exercise that manual third lock under the direction of the government. What the government wants to do and and what the Treasury and the central banks want is they want an automatic third lock. So you don’t have to go through the bank and not only can you apply sanctions and know your customer and money laundering laws, you can apply a full-blown social credit system, right? So I can make up a hugely complex rule system for Tucker and his kids and his grandkids. I can I can customize it for each one of you and I can give you incentives and I can give you rules and unless you do exactly what I say, I can turn off your money or I can apply negative interest rates to your money or positive interest rates, I can raise your taxes without anybody having any say about it. So, let me give you an example. Go back to the pandemic. If I say you’re locked down and you and your family can’t leave your house, your money won’t work outside your house. If I have an all digital system with an automatic third lock and let’s say I freeze your bank account, you can’t go to your bank and talk to them. It’s above their head. They won’t be implementing it. Okay, that gives them that’s what the data centers are for. That’s what the AI is for, at least in North America. You know, the goal of that because if you if you look at spatial control, it involves uh tremendous data because of the videos and the cameras and you’ve got lots of video footage. But then you can imagine financial transactions all over the world. If they’re going to bring four billion customers from around the world into the dollar markets or the the our stock market, that’s a huge amount of data for spatial and financial control. And and but with AI, what is AI great at? AI is fabulous at processing enormous amounts of mathematical information which is most of the information the data we’re talking about and so if they can put a manual third lock in a social credit system for every individual and and and essentially automate the whole process with AI then then they have the ability in fact to control many many people now here’s the question why would four billion people want to come into that system?
UK leaflet for migrants fiasco – don’t rape women, don’t photograph in public places! Nigel Turner, secretary of the British Press Photographers Association, on the stupidity of the leaflet. UK Home Office must correct advice on photography in public spaces, says NUJ The NUJ is calling on the Home Office to rectify information it has published and shared with asylum seekers on restrictions around photographing and filming people in public places. The information leaflet, posted on the government website on 19 August, makes a misleading blanket claim that people in the UK “could be arrested by the police” if they “take pictures or videos of someone without their permission […] including in public spaces, like streets or parks”. These statements misrepresent the law and risk misleading people on their rights and obligations. Taking photos or videos of people in public without their permission is not inherently unlawful. There are certain contexts in which photography and videos taken and shared without a person’s permission are legally prohibited – for example, voyeurism and upskirting or causing harassment and distress as per the Protection from Harassment Act. There is also a right to redress if a photo or video is taken or published of someone without permission in a private setting or where they have reasonable expectation of privacy. These legal restrictions should be communicated with accuracy and nuance, which are not present in the Home Office’s leaflet. NUJ members working in visual journalism are already experiencing increased obstruction, hostility and routinely deal with people questioning their right to photograph in public. This can even rise to instances of verbal and physical abuse, as has been documented by our Journalists’ Safety Tracker. Séamus Dooley, NUJ assistant general secretary, said: “This communication not only runs the risk of misleading asylum seekers, it could also have serious consequences for our members – particularly photographers and videographers who regularly carry out their work in public places. It also spreads public confusion that could serve to inhibit public interest journalism. Press photographers and other lens-based journalists perform a legitimate and important function in reporting and recording events in public spaces. “The union is very concerned that the spread of inaccurate information around the right to photograph and film people in public without permission could expose our members to increased hostility and harassment as well as wrongful accusations of criminality and unjustifiable stops by the police. This would undermine journalists’ right to report and the public’s right to know. “The NUJ urges the government to amend its publication and will be writing directly to the Home Secretary to raise this issue.”
https://youtu.be/y0anXcBR9VE&t=3290
Fletcher Prouty, CIA Colonel post WW2, on how Nazi spy chief Reinhardt Gehlen was secretly brought to the US and then made intelligence chief of West Germany in Bonn, Nazi Spy Chief, recruited in secret by US post WW2. The person who wrote the warren commission report uh rudolph augustus whitaker came from the army historical division where he had worked since the 50s he had been an official historian of the reich for adolf hitler and was brought into this country and the army historical division was apparently the early drop point for the Gehlen network and i wondered if you had a sense in your work of the role that these Nazis played when they came in and how central they were to the cold war history the reason i’ve alluded to the work of the OSS in Bucharest and hung in Romania under frank Wisner one of their leading agents is because that as the soviet army was coming to the border of Romania there was an interval of about 10 days the germans were fleeing and the Russians were coming in a peace treaty was signed with romania by united states and to Great Britain and in that little interlude they rounded up 750 American POWs mostly air crewmen have been bombing the plowest airfields and i received a call from general giles in cairo to set up about 35-40 aircraft to go to a little remote field in syria where a freight train would come by and we went there early in the morning and these 750 American POWs jumped off the train came running toward our planes to be flown to cairo and intermingled with these men we didn’t know it we started talking to someone on the airplane were Nazis who were being taken out of romania and the Balkans by the oss for pretty obvious reasons they knew all the intelligence in the Balkans they knew the intelligence in the ukraine and other adjoining areas of russia and they wanted to preserve them they didn’t want the communists you know they want even though russia was our ally i mean this was beginning the cold war i had been ordered to fly into russia only about two weeks before this other flight and and i lived up in russia for a little while getting uh doing a certain mission up there which was army mission you know we had no knowledge at the time we went up there to syria to pick up the American prisoners that among this group of 750 americans some British that they were going to be the these nazi intelligence specialists of course they weren’t identified to us but we realized they weren’t americans it’s only later when we talked to the general in cairo that we found out who they were and they were a top professional nazi team that knew all the agent networks in the in the southern part of the soviet union southwestern part and the balkans so in from that point of view they were invaluable but this was an effort run against the soviet union are alive at that period and i believe that probably this is the first step on record of a cold war move of major importance now you talked about general galen the agreements made with galen were made actually before the war ended he had made a deal with certain american intelligence people general seibert for one that he would lay low bury his files and surrender as soon as possible rather than draw attention to himself on the nazi side and galen of course was hitler’s prime intelligence general a terrific prisoner for us to gain but the object of this was basic to setting up the cold war material you see because galen’s intelligent information accounted for the rest of the western part of the soviet union and all of eastern europe and the discussions with galen were led that led to galen were led by alan dulles who was in switzerland as the oss senior officer in that area and it’s a very interesting thing because alan dulles and his brother john foster dulles were with this large law firm in new york sullivan cromwell sullivan cromwell had offices throughout germany all through the 30s and the Dulles brothers were very close to the tyson steelworks and ig farben company in fact interestingly enough the agency’s headquarters in germany after the war was in frankfurt germany in the ig Farben building you know it just happened that way well the dulles contacts that people thought would be oss intelligence work were actually the people he knew anyway as a result of his legal work in germany the nazis were while hitler was running germany and if you’ll recall the history like many other american companies even though world war ii started as far as england and france were concerned and holland and belgium and all in poland had been attacked american companies did not close their offices union bank from new york didn’t close its offices in germany nor did the sullivan cromwell until pearl harbor and then they more or less had to but then through intelligence they retain contacts
How intelligence services captured academia. ‘The Mighty Wurlitzer: how the CIA played America’ book by Hugh Wilford (2009)- term coined by CIA Frank Wisner The Mighty Wurlitzer: How the CIA Played America Hugh Wilford, . . Harvard Univ. Well before the beginning of the Cold War, the Soviet Union achieved a series of propaganda successes by using “front” organizations that ostensibly served independent purposes but were orchestrated by Moscow. In the late 1940s, Frank Wisner, chief of political warfare for the newly created CIA, proposed a U.S. version: a “mighty Wurlitzer” that like its namesake would play the music America desired. California State–Long Beach professor Wilford describes the “Wurlitzer” as most successful in supporting Western Europe’s noncommunist leftist unions, students and intellectuals during the 1950s. As the Cold War spread, the CIA organized programs in the Third World combining development with anticommunism. The CIA was more a source of funding and fine-tuning than the master player its organizers intended; few of its front groups were unaware of the connection. What made the system work was a shared, principled and intense anticommunism combined with trust in America’s intentions and capabilities. As these eroded during the Vietnam era, the Wurlitzer’s music grew discordant, then ceased altogether. Wilford’s conclusion that winning hearts and minds is best left to overt processes and organizations is predictable and defensible. Still, Wisner’s Wurlitzer helped level the playing field at a crucial period of the Cold War. In 1967 the magazine Ramparts ran an exposé revealing that the Central Intelligence Agency had been secretly funding and managing a wide range of citizen front groups intended to counter communist influence around the world. In addition to embarrassing prominent individuals caught up, wittingly or unwittingly, in the secret superpower struggle for hearts and minds, the revelations of 1967 were one of the worst operational disasters in the history of American intelligence and presaged a series of public scandals from which the CIA’s reputation has arguably never recovered. CIA official Frank Wisner called the operation his “mighty Wurlitzer,” on which he could play any propaganda tune. In this illuminating book, Hugh Wilford provides the first comprehensive account of the clandestine relationship between the CIA and its front organizations. Using an unprecedented wealth of sources, he traces the rise and fall of America’s Cold War front network from its origins in the 1940s to its Third World expansion during the 1950s and ultimate collapse in the 1960s. Covering the intelligence officers who masterminded the CIA’s fronts as well as the involved citizen groups–émigrés, labor, intellectuals, artists, students, women, Catholics, African Americans, and journalists–Wilford provides a surprising analysis of Cold War society that contains valuable lessons for our own age of global conflict.
‘The Maidan Massacre in Ukraine: the mass killing that changed the World’ book by Ivan Katchanovski. [DOWNLOAD THE BOOK 10MB https://drive.google.com/file/d/16x0bh-PMB8FTbffx7prqDVmv4bKTokSM The Maidan Massacre in Ukraine The Mass Killing that Changed the World Ivan Katchanovski © 2024 “A courageous and important study of one of the most momentous events in recent history. Based on a painstaking analysis of the available evidence, Katchanovski demonstrates how the false flag shootings of 18-20 February 2014 unfolded and their impact on subsequent developments in Ukraine. If a single book can change our understanding of a historical event, this is it.” (Richard Sakwa, Emeritus Professor of Russian and European Politics, University of Kent, UK) Shows how the Maidan massacre ultimately contributed to the start of the war in Donbas Provides detailed analysis of government investigations into the massacre and its perpetrators Explores the role of oligarchs and the far right in Ukrainian politics The book draws on publicly available videos, photos and audio recordings of the massacre in English, Ukrainian, Russian, Polish and other languages, along with several hundred individual testimonies and revelations from the Ukrainian investigation and a trial and its verdict. By examining which parties were responsible for the massacre, the book analyses its implications for not only Russia’s war on Ukraine but also political developments across the globe. Conflicting Narratives of the Maidan Massacre in Ukraine Video Reconstruction and Content Analysis of the Maidan Massacre on February 20, 2014 Testimonies of Several Hundred Witnesses and 14 Self-Admitted Maidan Snipers Trial and Investigation Testimonies of Wounded Maidan Activists and Witnesses Forensic Ballistic and Medical Examinations by Ukrainian Government Experts The Maidan Massacre on February 18–19, 2014, and Related Cases of Violence During the EuroMaidan in Ukraine The Maidan Massacre Trial Verdict, and Cover-up, Stonewalling, and Evidence Tampering Conclusion and Implications for the Russia-Ukraine War and Other Conflicts in Ukraine “Katchanovski’s study is a model of contemporary social science research based on social media, testimonies of participants, and evidence and verdicts of subsequent legal trials. Analysis derived from the data is unparalleled in the study of extra-legal politics in post-Soviet Ukraine. This is a convincing book which should be read by everyone interested in knowing the truth about current developments in Ukraine and especially the underlying causes of the Ukrainian-Russian conflict.” (David Lane, Emeritus Professor of Sociology, Cambridge University)
William Clarkson interviews Tony about Nick Land. Patricia Opulenza poem. We struck up a friendship playing SPI war games etc at ‘Diplomacy Club’ every Saturday at Nicks home in Warren Road on the edge of Hayes Common. The large interlinked woodland wilderness was the perfect place for Nick’s occasional ‘paramilitary exercises’ with other school friends. Nick and I sat next to each other at Langley Park School for Boys (LPSB) racing through Maths and Physics exercises, both joining the school’s Air Training Corps 578 squadron under Brian Hockings and later developing a shared interest in the curious phenomenon of hallucinogenic drugs. Nick had an obsession with the US carnage and had developed a ‘dark sense of humour’ around Vietnam. In contrast, he borrowed one of my hardback copies of Catholic writer and modern Bible translator JRR Tolkien’s Lord of The Rings. ‘Accelerationism is a range of revolutionary and reactionary ideas in left-wing and right-wing ideologies that call for the drastic intensification of capitalist growth, technological change, infrastructure sabotage [citation needed] and other processes of social change to destabilize existing systems and create radical social transformations, otherwise referred to as “acceleration”. It has been regarded as an ideological spectrum divided into mutually contradictory left-wing and right-wing variants, both of which support the indefinite intensification of capitalism and its structures as well as the conditions for a technological singularity, a hypothetical point in time at which technological growth becomes uncontrollable and irreversible.’ Nick Land on Satanism. Who Is Nick Land? Originally an anarchic academic at the University of Warwick, and later the leader of an avant-garde-theory cult organized around cyberpunk, cybernetics, mumbo jumbo and drugs, Land today is a living meme and an oracle, generating a singular mixture of caustic political commentary and oblique numerological ravings on his seminal X account from Shanghai. Known as the “father of accelerationism” after his doctrine of hyperintelligent capitalism superseding humanity (a fate which he welcomes), in recent years Land has been linked with white nationalist terrorism by U.S. activist journalists, saluted by investor Marc Andreessen in his widely circulated Techno-Optimist Manifesto, and had his writing cross-examined for ‘crimethink’ by a corrupt British barrister at the High Court in London. NICK LAND: You know, it’s really not just about whose side are you on, you know. I mean, if you say whose side are you on? Well, okay. You know, if it’s Manakian, I’ll be on God’s side rather than the devil’s side. You know, if I’m going to be punk, I’ll be on the devil’s side rather than God’s side.
Nazis developed both nuclear weapons | & MK ULTRA brainwashed assassins for USA | Israel behind the 7/7 London Bombings: Tony Gosling’s documentary, and article | Videos of full shows | Economic essentials: Michael Hudson | Blackrock/Vanguard | Why/how Israel Assassinated JFK & RFK | Operation Gladio | Tony on Brexit & (4th Reich) Traitors of Arnhem | Creation vs. Evolution | God vs. Lucifer | ‘Great Plan’ for 3 World Wars | Devil Worship: The Rise Of Satanism | Nuclear Armed IDF Doomsday Cult | Aanirfan | Armageddonists I have known: Nick Land (1976-8) | George Monbiot (1995-7) | Manna for the Revelation Generation: CONSPIRACY CLASSICS, longer interviews/lectures
Radio4All download pages
COMPLETE SHOW AND FULL INTERVIEWS [right click to download]
#1 – Complete 4hr show – [right click to download]
Full interviews with…
#2 – The Nerd Reich, Silicon Valley fascism and the war on democracy by Gil Duran – 00:35:00
#3 – EXCLUSIVE Nazi Nick Land a teenager at Langley Park, LSD, Satanism, Speed, Sussex Warwick universities, now in Shanghai Tony Gosling William Clarkson – 01:00:00
#4 – EXCLUSIVE Miodrag Zarkovic filmmaker on life of Bosnian Serb general Ratco Mladic saved Bosnian Serbs from armed Muslim Croats John Bosnitch – 00:35:00
#5 – EXCLUSIVE Neil Turner BPPAHome Office Leaflet falsely prohibits public photos and filming – 00:20:00
#6 – Col Fletcher Prouty on Nazis incoming to USA after WWII and JFK assassination – 01:20:00
#7 – Peter Hitchens This House Would Rather go to War with Russia than Lose Ukraine Oxford Union July 2026 – 00:15:00
The Bristol Politics Show CANCELLED and attempts to intimidate us
July 2024 – Tony, Dave and Martin’s NOT The BCfm Politics show was CANCELLED/EVICTED from their PRSC studio in a no fault, no notice, no appeal, eviction by Chloe Slater of The People’s Republic of Stokes Croft (PRSC) arts centre – An email from Chloe and Keith Cowling explained that: ‘Transphobic’ leaflets, which we were not shown, had been left in the building by a recent guest (who denied it) making Transsexual users of the building feel ‘offended’ and ‘unsafe’. To quote: ‘Please let us know when you or Dave would like to come and retrieve your equipment and drop off your keys. Kind regards’ PRSC Directors (Keith Cowling, chair) PRSC / Stokes Croft China 17-35 Jamaica St Bristol BS2 8JP. Chloe Slater (formerly young man Jez and now self-defined as ‘she’) also made it difficult for us to retrieve the last of our equipment by inferring we couldn’t be trusted, we were made to wait in the cold outside their building for over 30 minutes to return their mixing desk and retrieve our remaining kit in December 2024.
[UPDATE channel restored by YT in July 2025] October 2022 – Tony’s Public Enquiry Channel opened in March 2008, with 13 million views, over 1,600 videos and 26,000 subscribers is removed under false pretences by YouTube – A video Tony recorded in New Zealand ‘Bill Gates, ID2020 & Revelation: Quaker Tony Gosling on Covid 19 & the Bible’ and uploaded on 8th April 2020 got a ‘third strike’ but YouTube’s ‘medical misinformation’ regime was introduced in September 2021 so should not have included as ‘strikes’ videos uploaded before that date. Documentary makers are just about the only public interest investigators left in the NATO zone. From the top down, our mainstream media, police, political parties & intelligence services are being compromised by feudal banksters, secret societies and the mafia. Key people intimidated by psychopathic black magic types and their pliable drones who will even kill to take over positions of power? Just search for “John Scarlett” and “Dodgy Dossier” and you’ll see what I mean. The Zionists are every bit as fundamentalist and twisted as the leaders and followers of ISIS. Register here and join us in the discussion as we wriggle free of the psychopaths, back to sanity http://www.911forum.org.uk
March 2020 – BCfm’s weekly Politics Show presented by Tony Gosling with Irish Republican Labour activist Martin Summers was forced off FM, now online only by station manager Pat Hart. He decided the show should be ‘rested, due to the pandemic’ on 24 March 2020 and then refused to communicate at all when we requested to do the show remotely. Bristol Community FM (BCfm) charity ‘CEO’ Patrick Hart is a long-time personal friend of Bristol’s all-powerful right-wing ‘Labour’ mayor Marvin Rees. Pat Hart has a private property portfolio on the continent and also does Public Relations work for property speculators who are taking over community facilities such as Redfield Cinema. Now on Internet only NOT The BCfm Politics Show is available 17:00-c. 20:00 live on Fridays. Pat Hart replaced us with a dumbed-down student show repeating MSM stories called The Bristol Agenda. If you’d like to share your views on his deliberate dumbing-down and pro-Covid jab mismanagement you can contact UK broadcasting regulator Ofcom or BCfm board chair and the ‘Don’ himself, here.
February 2019 – Ofcom complaint result: UKLFI exposed as creation of Israeli foreign ministry – Bristol Post article: BCfm cleared after being reported to Ofcom for anti-semitic conspiracy theories – It could have resulted in BCfm radio station being shut down if the complaint was upheld Tony Gosling reported to Ofcom by UK Lawyers for Israel after being accused of anti-semitism A Bristol radio station, which had one of its programmes reported for anti-semitism and racism has been cleared by Ofcom. The radio regulatory body received a complaint from “UK Lawyers for Israel’ over a show on BCfm radio, hosted by investigative journalist Tony Gosling. The weekly politics show, on the popular community radio station based in Easton, was reported for several allegations on a show which aired on November 23. Tony Gosling, who was a former BBC journalist between 1989 and 1993, has been producing and presenting ‘The Tony Gosling Politics’ show every week on BCFM radio for 11 years. They have released a statement which reads: “Whilst we are supportive of all our volunteer presenters, The Tony Gosling Politics Show only represents approximately ten percent of our political output content wise, and less than two per cent of our entire weekly output.” Mr Gosling’s programme looks at local politics and he interviews a range of councillors and MPs in the city. The show is also perhaps more well known for its alternative look at international politics, and he has a cult following online from across the world. Mr Gosling has made regular appearances on national media including the politics show with Andrew Neil on BBC One, and international channels such as Russia Today, Channel1 Russia, NTV, and recently for both Turkish and Lebanon TV.
November 2012 – Tony gets death threats on the phone from the Jewish Defence League – ‘you’re a dead man walking’ – a man calls him and Tony records the call. Audio of UK Jewish Defence League (JDL) death threat against British journalist Tony Gosling (2012) – Avon and Somerset police Special Branch investigate, trace the caller, and after six months report to Tony that the individual has been served a caution that they will proceed with a prosecution for harassment under the 1861 offences against the person act. Seems pretty clear this death threat was issued alongside the lies, copied below, which were published on their blog by London based UK JDL in November 2012. Firstly Tony Gosling is not a ‘homophobe’. That accusation was first made in an article published by the ‘Harry’s Place’ blog, penned by Zionist David Toube and propelled by him anonymously into Private Eye in 2008. It refers to Gosling’s criticism of senior teachers at Bannerman Road Primary school in Bristol who used homosexual early learning picture books against the express wishes of the parent governors. His criticism was about the deception by teaching staff not because of the homosexual content of the books. Secondly, if you follow the JDL link you’ll find what Tony Gosling actually says about the ‘Protocols Of The Learned Elders Of Zion’ says “…I don’t think there is much doubt that the Protocols are fake…” Thirdly he is not a member of Bristol Palestine Solidarity Campaign and has never been to any of their meetings.
Autumn 2014 – Tony’s documentary production and distribution business shut down by its bank. Our thriving Co-op business bank account ordered closed for undisclosed reasons. Tony Gosling and Ben Edwards founded i-Contact Video Network to distribute documentaries on VHS video and DVD and to make their own documentaries as well as attend news events and sell video footage to TV news channels. Amongst the films we distributed were Operation Solstice, Coconut Revolution, Mark Purdey and Organophosphates, McLibel, 9/11 In Plane Site, Ludicrous Diversion and The Battle of Trafalgar. These, plus books, and even a board game about drug dealing ‘Dollars and Dibble’, were all available via mail order and we supplied libraries around the world too. The bank had clearly been ordered to investigate us for money laundering, although they never admitted it. All the questions they asked Ben and I were about proving our identity through passports etc.. When we did, yet more letters kept arriving demanding more proofs, birth certificates etc. and eventually when one of us missed supplying the required information, within a week or so of being asked, the account was summarily closed and we got a cheque made out to one of us with the few hundred pounds that was in the business bank account. Since neither of us could get a business bank account up and running for at least a few months and the bank account meant nobody could any longer use the website, we made the reluctant decision to shut it down. Thus was a thriving business killed off by the Co_operative bank. Having said that, co-op were not quite the worst. We did apply to open an account at Bristol’s ‘ethical’ Triodos bank, who proceeded to string us along for several months and then said our business was too risky for them to provide an account!
