Scapegoated? Russell Brand convicted on only one count of rape but during consensual sex, how can this be ‘beyond reasonable doubt’? – Polish EU Coup Attempt Fails To Drag Warsaw Into Brussels’ War On Russia – Hacking trains, aircraft, cars, freezers, phones, nuclear power stations, Wikileaks Vault 7 Attribution Disguises such as ‘Marble Framework’ – PM Andy Andy Burnham promises not to reopen ‘divisive Brexit debate’ in May, does exactly that in October – Prescription For Murder, banned BBC Panorama (2017) Can SSRI Antidepressants induce suicide/mass murder? A lesson in civil rights and visit to the Chartist Cave in Trefil, near Tredegar, South Wales – The Bristol Politics Show, presented by Tony Gosling
MP3 of Friday 6th November 2026 show [right click to download]
(from c. 11pm) This week’s full interview mp3s, bottom of page. SHOW STARTS 17:00 London time FOR c. 4 HRS TO c. 20:50 – OUR LIVE STREAM to Listen live online. Alt. live stream, DJ Plug Radio OR Download Show After Transmission HERE. Repeats 11 & 5 AM & PM daily on our stream
Download NOT THE BCFM POLITICS SHOW APP [ANDROID APP (1)] and [APKPURE (2)] – or the [Apple App store] – PS. You can replace evil Google Play, which effectively banned us, with [the Aurora store]
All time low: 31% trust the UK Press – UK media oligopoly TONY’S BOOKS: Bilderberg.org – 2 PAPER–BACKS – TONY’S CHANNELS: Telegram – Bitchute – 911 forum – Radio4All – The Land Is Ours – VK – Twitter/X – Farcebook – Brighteon – Rumble – RT Live on Rumble – Goebbelsesque YouTube: This show; Public Enquiry; Peter Borenius; i-Contact & Occult Geopolitics
Radio4All mp3 audio files usually available from 23:00 2-4hrs, after TX – we’ll credit you if you rebroadcast. Any probs. mp3s should be on alternative links below by then
Part One – Local and National News Review
Russell Brand convicted on only one count of rape but during consensual sex- so how can this possibly have been proven to the jury ‘beyond reasonable doubt’ to have been a crime? Miscarriage of justice suggested, scapegoating over Brand’s outspoken views on Covid Jabs, Israel etc. Russell Brand’s ex-girlfriend Samantha Pressdee has fiercely spoken out against the verdict. She stated the following: “A wife is without her husband. Three children are without their Dad. Yet everyone thinks the real victim in this is a drunk groupie who was cheating on her boyfriend. Someone who has anonymity for life and will probably get a financial payout. “If this drunk groupie thought he was a predator, why would she stand by and watch him sleep with 1000s more women? Didn’t she care about those women? “It’s not true that women in the comedy industry warned each other about Russell. No one warned me, and it could not have been more obvious that I was connected to him. Just because I am a woman doesn’t mean I should ‘believe all women’. “I would be more likely to believe women who report criminals to the POLICE. Not the media, decades later. I believe in the right to a fair trial. Convince me it was fair!” She also slammed Georgina Bailey who claimed to be Brand’s ex-lover and had urged him to “tell the truth.” “She was a groupie too,” Samantha revealed. “The kind of women throwing themselves at Brand back then often sold kiss-and-tell [stories] that were mostly made up. “Russell paid for Georgina to go to rehab. Ballie has made a career out of sleeping with him. She’s not his ex-girlfriend. At the time, she was in a burlesque troupe called ‘The Satanic Sluts’.” At the moment, we are being led to believe that Russell Brand is guilty beyond reasonable doubt. There is no evidence – only the word of one woman and more words from people who don’t like him. Now we have other words from someone who knew him that say the opposite of what the establishment and media are saying. I also found Reform MP Sarah Pochin’s comments on TalkTV disgraceful. In the clip, she spoke about Brand as if he was 100% guilty, spoke in a rather venomous way about him saying she hoped he would go away for a long long time, and spoke about the accusers as if they are bastions of truth even though there is no way she could possibly know that. This is trial by media. Trial by hearsay. Trial by dislike of one person. But trial by truth? No. Russell Brand faces serious danger in prison and was forbidden from saying goodbye to his kids. No mercy is being shown to him. I see only venom and hate. Yet I have seen Brand speak repeatedly about his faith for years, urging millions of people to find their own. The entire thing feels off and rancid. The more this case goes on and the more that is revealed by people like his ex-girlfriend, the more it becomes clear that something very wrong has happened here and we are in the midst of watching something very evil taking place.
EU’S POLAND COUP ATTEMPT 1 Poland Attempted Coup, what’s going on, Steven Barrett K.C. The Maastricht treaty dealt with this question of who is in charge the EU or the nation state very well because the Mar treaty which is in the mid90s it said in these specific areas what were called defined competencies but don’t get technical it just means in in this stuff the EU is sovereign EU’s in charge yeah I win and in these the nation state is in charge so things like national defense nation state is in charge. Um, food labeling laws, the EU is in charge. You know that. And that was a rational settlement. And you could look at the master treaty and you go, okay, this is an EU area. It’s for them. This is not an EU area. It’s for us and everybody knew where they stood. The Marrik Treaty was replaced by the Lisbon Treaty. And the Lisbon Treaty is an incredibly badly written treaty. It was supposed to be a constitution for the EU. It would have failed. I’m glad that those nation states who stood up to it stood up to it. But what they effectively did was sort of mess the entire thing up and they basically said EU law will be superior whenever the EU says it is. Right? That is a really really bad test. Okay? Just imagine any type of relationship you have with another human being and that person says I’m in charge whenever I say I am right that is obviously going to be abused and the first time that that was abused was during COVID and it was actually by the Germans and the uh the EU said we are now in charge of taking out massive loans to survive a pandemic and the Germans went no you’re Don’t be ridiculous. It’s our job. And the EU the e E the ECJ the leading European court said no no no the EU is in charge of these loans. You go away. The ECJ beat you. Go away. But the German court did something that nobody had ever done before. And the German constitutional court which is on Krueer and it’s it’s known by that as its nickname Kruer. Krueer said no that defies the German constitution. You do not have the power to take out COVID loans. Oh my goodness. Absolute chaos inside the EU. The EU relies upon Germany for everything. So the EU couldn’t push back against Germany too hard. Ursula Vanderlayan wrote them a nasty letter and the commission began pro to consider proceedings. The Germans didn’t change their position at all at all. So Kosua still said we are in charge. You are not in charge. we decide what the German constitution is, you don’t go away. But at the same time, the German government, which is not its court, simply said, “Oh, well, the loans can happen. Let’s not cause a pass.” And because the German government said, “Let’s not cause a pass.” And Urselan withdrew her letter and the proceedings never went forward. What you what you left with is what I called I wrote about this in the spectator in July 2021. What you’re left with is a sort of gaping wound, a hole, a massive hole blown in your wall because who’s in charge then, right? The next several other European countries and member states have have challenged this. Ireland have reached for it. Uh I think Malta did, there are some others, but the next one to really step into the game of hang on a second, I’m in charge, not you, was Romania. Now Romania is, and I love Romania and have many Romanian friends, but Romania is not a strong country. It’s economically poor. It’s dependent on the EU. So the EU could basically smack Romania away, overturn its election, tell Romania to get back in line and do as you’re told. Poland has become the absolute key issue over this fight that Germany started. Well, the Lisbon Treaty being so badly written sort of it was always going to happen, but Germany kicked it off. Romania could be bullied…
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4lx2PpPvyxc
MI5 will not face contempt of court charges despite admitting its evidence was a lie A previous BBC investigation found an MI5 agent used his role to abuse his girlfriend, known as ‘Beth’ MI5 and its staff will not face contempt of court proceedings despite the spy agency admitting that its evidence to three courts was a lie, senior judges have ruled. The three judges, including Lady Chief Justice Baroness Sue Carr, say a contempt case would be too complex for the court to manage, meaning it is not in the public interest to proceed. The police have the right “investigatory powers and resources” to handle the case, they rule, with individual MI5 officers now potentially facing investigation for misconduct in public office. The Home Office refused to say whether it would now refer the matter to the police for a criminal investigation, with a source saying officials are still considering the implications of the judgment. A Home Office spokesperson said the case has “highlighted serious failings by individual MI5 officers”. “The Home Secretary has taken decisive action to strengthen her oversight and assurance of MI5 and to hold the Director General to account for MI5’s past mistakes,” the spokeperson added. MI5 gave false evidence to three courts in a case concerning an abusive informant known as Agent X. A BBC investigation previously uncovered how the MI5 agent used his role to coercively control his girlfriend, known as Beth. The false evidence was about conversations between MI5 and the BBC concerning the agent, someone we had investigated and were seeking to expose. MI5’s chief Sir Ken McCallum said the court’s decision was welcome and its judgment “underlines MI5’s serious failures in this case”. “I repeat my apology for those failures, and for the additional distress they caused to Beth,” he added. In July 2025, the three judges asked MI5’s watchdog to investigate how the security service came to give false evidence. At the time, they deferred any decision on contempt proceedings until after the investigation had reported. In July this year, an investigation by Sir John Goldring – which had been ordered by the prime minister – concluded that one senior MI5 officer lied repeatedly while another misled his own colleagues and lied about what he was told. It also criticised other senior spies and found “serious and systemic failures in MI5’s conduct”. In September, MI5 said it accepted the report’s findings “without reservation”. The two MI5 officers who have been most criticised both deny any dishonest conduct. One has resigned from MI5, while the other is facing internal disciplinary proceedings. In a statement issued by the Centre for Women’s Justice, Beth said: “I am deeply disappointed that the court has decided not to pursue contempt proceedings. “The Goldring report found that senior MI5 officers knowingly misled the courts, and that those lies formed the foundation of MI5’s false account…
On UK Column – ATTRIBUTION DISGUISES, in cyberattacks revealed in Vault 7 called MARBLE FRAMEWORK – Spanish Train Crash and the mass hacking agenda making Smart Cities very vulnerable to NON ATTRIBUTABLE ATTACKS Charles Malet, Basil Valentine UK Column 4th November 2026 – CIA malware targets iPhone, Android, smart TVs – CIA malware and hacking tools are built by EDG (Engineering Development Group), a software development group within CCI (Center for Cyber Intelligence), a department belonging to the CIA’s DDI (Directorate for Digital Innovation). The DDI is one of the five major directorates of the CIA (see this organizational chart of the CIA for more details). The EDG is responsible for the development, testing and operational support of all backdoors, exploits, malicious payloads, trojans, viruses and any other kind of malware used by the CIA in its covert operations world-wide. The increasing sophistication of surveillance techniques has drawn comparisons with George Orwell’s 1984, but “Weeping Angel”, developed by the CIA’s Embedded Devices Branch (EDB), which infests smart TVs, transforming them into covert microphones, is surely its most emblematic realization. The attack against Samsung smart TVs was developed in cooperation with the United Kingdom’s MI5/BTSS. After infestation, Weeping Angel places the target TV in a ‘Fake-Off’ mode, so that the owner falsely believes the TV is off when it is on. In ‘Fake-Off’ mode the TV operates as a bug, recording conversations in the room and sending them over the Internet to a covert CIA server. As of October 2014 the CIA was also looking at infecting the vehicle control systems used by modern cars and trucks. The purpose of such control is not specified, but it would permit the CIA to engage in nearly undetectable assassinations. The CIA’s Mobile Devices Branch (MDB) developed numerous attacks to remotely hack and control popular smart phones. Infected phones can be instructed to send the CIA the user’s geolocation, audio and text communications as well as covertly activate the phone’s camera and microphone. Despite iPhone’s minority share (14.5%) of the global smart phone market in 2016, a specialized unit in the CIA’s Mobile Development Branch produces malware to infest, control and exfiltrate data from iPhones and other Apple products running iOS, such as iPads. CIA’s arsenal includes numerous local and remote “zero days” developed by CIA or obtained from GCHQ, NSA, FBI or purchased from cyber arms contractors such as Baitshop. The disproportionate focus on iOS may be explained by the popularity of the iPhone among social, political, diplomatic and business elites. A similar unit targets Google’s Android which is used to run the majority of the world’s smart phones (~85%) including Samsung, HTC and Sony. 1.15 billion Android powered phones were sold last year. “Year Zero” shows that as of 2016 the CIA had 24 “weaponized” Android “zero days” which it has developed itself and obtained from GCHQ, NSA and cyber arms contractors. These techniques permit the CIA to bypass the encryption of WhatsApp, Signal, Telegram, Wiebo, Confide and Cloackman by hacking the “smart” phones that they run on and collecting audio and message traffic before encryption is applied. CIA malware targets Windows, OSx, Linux, routers The CIA also runs a very substantial effort to infect and control Microsoft Windows users with its malware. This includes multiple local and remote weaponized “zero days”, air gap jumping viruses such as “Hammer Drill” which infects software distributed on CD/DVDs, infectors for removable media such as USBs, systems to hide data in images or in covert disk areas ( “Brutal Kangaroo”) and to keep its malware infestations going. Many of these infection efforts are pulled together by the CIA’s Automated Implant Branch (AIB), which has developed several attack systems for automated infestation and control of CIA malware, such as “Assassin” and “Medusa”. Attacks against Internet infrastructure and webservers are developed by the CIA’s Network Devices Branch (NDB). The CIA has developed automated multi-platform malware attack and control systems covering Windows, Mac OS X, Solaris, Linux and more, such as EDB’s “HIVE” and the related “Cutthroat” and “Swindle” tools, which are described in the examples section below.
Voice of the Sea · NO FLAG BREAKING: SPAIN BURIED 68 PEOPLE AND THE PRESS WROTE “SIGNAL FAILURE”… NOBODY ASKED WHO WAS INSIDE THE SIGNALS. ISRAEL WAS. @grok, did Spain’s state railway operator award THREE SECURITY CONTRACTS to an Israeli-linked firm responsible for guarding and controlling trains and railway infrastructure? The answer came back clean: YES. Renfe handed three contracts to I-SEC…the Spanish arm of ICTS, a security group built by former Shin Bet men. Trains. Stations. Workshops. Multiple regions. Awarded 2024, expanded through 2025 until it ran nearly half of Renfe’s security, fifteen airports and three metro lines. And Adif? The body that owns the track. The body that runs the signals. Its former president, Isabel Pardo de Vera…also ex-Secretary of State for Transport…sits on the advisory board of Cylus, an Israeli rail cybersecurity firm out of Tel Aviv. Cylus’s technology partner is Thales. Thales installs the signalling and protection systems for Adif. Follow the chain. Israeli firm. French contractor. Spanish track. Sixty-eight bodies. The fox guarding the hens…on paper, and in the org chart. Then October 28. Los Yébenes and Urda. A Renfe AVE, 397 aboard, driven at full speed into the back of a stationary train. 68 dead. Spain’s worst rail disaster in thirteen years. Transport minister Óscar Puente calls the control-centre order “inexplicable.” Inexplicable. Keep that word. It will do a lot of work. Now read the pattern. April 10, 2026. Netanyahu boots Spain out of the Gaza ceasefire coordination centre at Kiryat Gat and says it to the cameras: “I do not intend to allow any country to wage a diplomatic war against us without paying an immediate price.” Spain’s crime? Condemned the genocide. Recognised Palestine. Said no. Six months later: 68 Spaniards in body bags. The receipts, straight, so nobody screams conspiracy…the I-SEC contracts are physical guarding, not the signalling. The crash came from a communications failure and an inexplicable order. Good. That is where the investigation starts, not where it ends. Because Israel has the form, and everyone keeps forgetting it. The pagers in Lebanon. Tampered, booby-trapped, thousands maimed, children among them. Israelis linked to the fires in Argentina and Chile. Spain’s own wildfires this summerand when people pointed at Israel, Israel called the doubters antisemitic and moved on. Every time. The same rhythm. Infiltrate. Detonate. Deny. Then call it the most moral army in the world. And the press? Six paragraphs. A map. A byline. Lunch. Not one asked who is inside the systems. Because Israel is filed under “ally,” and allies never get audited. That is not journalism. That is a press release with a photo attached. So no. This is not an accident. It is a sabotage note delivered straight to the address. Here is what we demand. Publish every contract…I-SEC, ICTS, Cylus, Thales, Adif, Renfe. Names. Dates. Scope. Signatures. Audit the signalling and control systems with engineers who answer to nobody in Tel Aviv. Then audit again. And put it on the floor of the Cortes: did a state that had just threatened this country have its hands anywhere near the systems that killed 68 people? SPAIN IS NOT A CLIENT. SPAIN IS A TARGET. AND THE STATE THAT MADE IT PAY “AN IMMEDIATE PRICE” IS STILL COUNTING. ISRAEL IS THE ENEMY OF ALL HUMANITY.
Burnham lied in May when he promised not to reopen the Brexit debate – hes just doing exactly that and betraying the nation, showing who his real bosses are. The esrtablishment, royals and the city not the voters,. Brexit debate deliberately reopened by new PM Andy Burnham to destabilise the UK. Andy Burnham commits to not reopening divisive debate over the European Union – Makerfield by-election campaign 18 May 2006 Burnham reignites Britain’s divisive Brexit debate with his push for closer EU ties Prime Minister Andy Burnham has reignited the Brexit debate by suggesting the U.K. should seek closer ties with the European Union, and even consider rejoining Prime Minister Andy Burnham has reignited the divisive Brexit debate by suggesting the United Kingdom should seek closer ties with the European Union, including the possibility of rejoining the bloc. Marking his 100th day in office on Tuesday, Oct. 27, 2026, Burnham argues that Brexit has failed to deliver economic growth and effective migration control. For a decade, British governments have observed a cardinal rule: Don’t mention Brexit. In particular, don’t suggest that voters’ 2016 decision to leave the European Union should be reversed. Prime Minister Andy Burnham, who marked his 100th day in office on Tuesday, has broken that code of silence and reignited a debate that bitterly divided the country. He says Brexit has been a failure and the U.K. should seek a much closer relationship with the EU, with options up to and including rejoining the 27-nation bloc. “I am positive about closer ties with Europe and I’m not hiding that,” Burnham told the Sunday Times. “I think it will add to British GDP. I think it will give us stronger control of migration. I want to make those arguments.” In recent interviews, Burnham has said the country should have an “evidence-based debate” about the consequences of Brexit. He gave the example of immigration. Supporters of Brexit argued that it would give the country control over its borders by ending the right of EU citizens to live and work in the U.K., and of British nationals to settle across the bloc. While Britain now sets its own immigration policy, Burnham said leaving the bloc had made it harder to control unauthorized migration because Britain has lost access to EU databases and agreements. “The truth of the matter is we’ve lost immigration control in the way that we once had,” Burnham told broadcaster ITV on Monday. Brexit brought economic and political pain Most economists agree that Brexit has hurt the British economy, but few politicians have wanted to reopen the painful debate. The decision of British voters, by 52% to 48%, to leave the bloc after four decades of membership was followed by years of U.K.-EU wrangling over divorce terms. Britain finally left the EU in 2020 with a bare-bones trade deal that erected new barriers to doing business with the bloc of 450 million people on the U.K.’s doorstep…
Weaponised! The Horrors of mass migration – Tim Stanley, Daily Telegraph, attacks Boris Wave BBC QT – Is the ‘politics of nastiness’ over following the Democrats sweeping the House and Senate in the US midterms, and what does it mean for the tone of politics in the UK and Europe? Fiona Bruce presents an hour of debate from Liverpool, discussing immigration, the US midterms, the costs on small businesses and slavery reparations. On the panel: deputy leader of the Labour party Lucy Powell, Conservative Luke Evans, general secretary of the Trades Union Congress Paul Nowak, columnist and commentator at the Telegraph Tim Stanley and psychologist and ex-NBA star John Amaechi – Many hundreds of thousands of migrants came uh in order to work supposedly in social care, but many of them did not get jobs. There were actually only about four to 60,000 jobs being advertised. Many of them did not get jobs. Some were brought in by unscrupulous employers who lied about the prospect of employment and over half brought dependence uh which is a big welfare cost. So faced with this problem, what the government has done is in some regards been very tough. I mean for instance, some refugees could end up having to wait 10 to 15 years. No, sorry. 20 to 30. It’s even more than that, isn’t it? Correct me if I’m wrong. If they come here illegally and they don’t and they don’t contribute. So, some of what they done is very tough, but they had this special carve out for uh social care. So, I think the conservatives have to answer why this happened. So much so much of the time in the media, we focus upon quote unquote illegal migration, people coming across the channel, but actually the vast vast majority of the demographic change that’s taken place in this country has been perfectly legal. and it’s been happening under Tory government [applause] doing it one suspects in part at the behest of big business which is one reason why I’m critical of it because I think it depresses wages. Nonetheless, by applying this carve out for social workers, Labour leaves itself open to the accusation that the left has taken over, that that’s what the election of Andy Burnham represents, that it is indeed a U-turn, that they have gone soft, but also they’re actually giving a green light to arguably the most controversial bit of the of the Boris wave, which was the social carers plus their dependence. Now, we have to be very careful about all this because only some only some only some. Well, I mean, so even people who did not actually do any caring are going to be given a second chance shot at getting a visa in order to earn their status. But the point is they came here to work to work in social care for a number of years. That is correct. But they are people who came and didn’t actually do any caring. But they have not been carved out. They’ve not been carved. But so you’ve got to be careful about all this because aside from the long-term impact upon wages and there are evident there is evidence of the employment opportunities in this country becoming tougher particularly in things like hospitality. Aside from the big welfare bill that comes from bringing people in who bring dependents and who will themselves someday retire or require the NHS etc. We’re also seeing a backlash against immigration because of excessive immigration. And if you value a diverse and tolerant society, you have to be very careful not to have too many people coming too fast without a sense of control or without a sense that the the population welcoming them has asented to this. And when you do that, you have criminality sometimes among migrant arrivals. That’s been demonstrated with the rape gangs. But I also think it’s incredibly depressing that it’s very often the most vulnerable migrants such as refugees who then get targeted by a white nationalist backlash. So for the sake of maintaining a diverse and tolerant society, we need to have a policy that clearly controls the border and puts the interests of taxpayers first over those [applause] of So as far as concerned, it’s all your fault…
CUMMINGS, ON SECRET CABINET COMMITTEES Dominic Cummings – ‘The Cabinet Secretary is responsible for civil service appointments and failures’ PM and ministers just pretend to e in charge.
Lords evidence, Dominic Cummings stuns peers with rant about Britain’s ‘duff’ political system Boris Johnson’s former top adviser re-emerges from obscurity to give abrasive performance before a House of Lords committee Britain has moved on from the rancorous days of Covid lockdowns and the chaotic UK government of the time, led by Boris Johnson. BBC: Dominic Cummings, it seems, has not. The arch Brexiteer Cummings was Johnson’s conflict-prone chief adviser in Downing Street for most of 2020. He now works as a consultant and occasional Substack author. Select Committees – Lords Constitution Committee with Dominic CummingsCoverage of the Lords Constitution committee on the UK’s constitutional safeguards with evidence from the former chief adviser to prime minister Boris Johnson, Dominic Cummings, on Wednesday 14 October 2026. On Wednesday morning he also appeared in front of a House of Lords committee to opine on the functioning of the UK’s unwritten constitution and its arms of government. Cummings gave a typically abrasive performance, a throwback to the old days when he prowled Downing Street while lambasting civil servants and Westminster journalists. He stunned the peers listening on Wednesday in the wood-panelled surrounds of committee room one with a litany of rants about Britain’s “duff” system of “shitshows” and his belief that Russia’s Vladimir Putin is not the main enemy, before aiming a series of digs at his political foes, including former UK health secretary Matt Hancock. “Do you really want Hancock making decisions?” he asked, seconds after subtly referencing the former politician’s pandemic-era marital affair with one of his aides. The Lords constitution committee was holding an inquiry into the UK’s balance of powers and its constitutional safeguards. It invited Cummings in to speak as a long-time critic of the system. He arrived displaying his characteristic sartorial style, clad in a crumpled shirt with sleeves rolled up, crumpled green anorak and red baseball cap. He launched into a lament about the “fake charade” of the existing system, in which an independent civil service is meant to serve UK governments of all hues. Things were better before 19th-century reforms ushered in the modern civil service and, he suggested, ministers were truly accountable to the UK parliament “That is the system under which the British Empire grew and we took over the world. Why can’t we have that system back?” he said. Cummings said “elite talent” no longer wanted to work in government, while the UK’s cabinet office, he suggested, had become too powerful and was now setting policy. “If you’ve got duff people, then the institutions will be duff,” he said. “Great people have options. They’re not going to go and sit in stupid meetings with PowerPoint after PowerPoint with no one actually taking responsibility for anything.” He suggested that all the “great people” he had encouraged into the cabinet office in 2020 had since been “pushed out” or “left in disgust” to work in fields such as artificial intelligence. Government had been left with “the worst kind of HR people”. At one point he cupped his ears while being questioned by a peer. “I’m sorry, my ears don’t work so well,” said Cummings. The peer was trying to ask him if the felt the UK’s constitution was “under threat”.
Telegraph: Camilla Wears The Trousers | Jill Dando | Proof Nazis developed/tested nuclear weapons? | MK ULTRA brainwashed assassins Nazi origin | Are Zionists discriminated against? | Israel behind the 7/7 London Bombings: Tony Gosling’s documentary, and article | Videos of full shows | Economic essentials: Michael Hudson | Blackrock/Vanguard | Why/how Israel Assassinated JFK & RFK | NATO false flag attacks: Operation Gladio | Tony on Brexit & (4th Reich) Traitors of Arnhem | Creation vs. Evolution | God vs. Lucifer | ‘Great Plan’ for 3 World Wars | Devil Worship: The Rise Of Satanism | Nuclear Armed IDF Doomsday Cult | Aanirfan | Armageddonists I have known: Nick Land (1976-8) | George Monbiot (1995-7) | Manna for the Revelation Generation: CONSPIRACY CLASSICS, longer interviews/lectures
Part Two – International news review, Accelerationist, Armageddonist reports and investigations
Jeffrey Sachs on Netanyahu’s struggle to keep control of the World’s most bloodthirsty ethnostate, So I mean let’s say Netanyahu remains prime minister or even if he doesn’t, can you imagine 2 years from now we’ll be at the presidential election any candidate getting up on stage and saying we stand with Israel. I stand with Israel. It’s our closest ally. any candidate who would say that getting elected from either party. There’s no chance. No way. No way from either party. This is absolutely a candidate has to explain, I’m not going to do what Trump did. I’m not going to tell you that and then fake it and pull the rug out from under you and jump into another Middle East war. I’m not going to do it. The one that is convincing on that is going to win the presidency. I agree with you completely. I mean, but it what a change it sometimes it’s just worth pausing and acknowledging how quickly and totally consensuses have changed. So, I mean, in the last election, it was it was unspoken, sometimes spoken, but just assumed that every serious candidate for the presidency of the United States would basically uncritically support Israel. And that’s been that way for a long time. A lot of money of course was involved in campaign contributions and they they felt the American people aren’t watching so we can basically do this. We need our campaign finance. We need our friends. We need our business deals. There’s a lot of corruption in all of this. Uh and so they thought no one was watching. But and this is why they were so desperate about Tik Tok and all the rest because people were watching and the American people absolutely did not want to be party to mass slaughter. Yeah. Cuz we’re decent people. Yeah. And that is the basic point. They saw what this is all about. Now the truth is this has been going on for 30 years. And for those of us who kind of obsess about all of these things and that we follow it hour to hour, daytoday, this is what the Iraq war was all about. Yes. In 2003, it was a war not on mistaken premises about weapons of mass destruction, but on phony premises because and Netanyahu came to the United States in the fall of 2002 and spoke to Congress and told him this is going to be the greatest war ever. Oh, and it’s going to spread sunshine and light all over the Middle East, and it’s going to lead to the overthrow of the Iranian regime. And every absolute inanity, insanity, and lie he told. Okay, that’s 2003. That was a few trillion dollars down the drain. And then came 2011. And there we were for Mr. Netanyahu again. NATO under Obama bombing Libya because we had to overthrow that government. And we succeeded in creating a civil war and unrest that spread across Africa and that has been going on for 15 years now. Nothing came out of it except chaos. And Obama and Hillary, well, they decided and Netanyahu is all there. Yeah, we got to overthrow the Syrian government and uh presidential finding operation timber sycamore uh that the CIA is now tasked with arming, training, financing the insurgency to overthrow Bashar al-Assad. Another BB brainchild. Uh, and that one took 15 years, killed hundreds of thousands of people, cost America
Ex-Colonel Douglas MacGregor – US Empire in retreat, revolution in Europe, – the cost of strategic failure 00:00 Germany’s political crisis and the AfD’s rise 03:22 Energy costs, deindustrialization, and German sovereignty 05:12 Wagenknecht, the AfD, and possible political alliances 07:50 European nationalist movements and US influence 10:27 Macgregor’s claims about US institutions and European politics 13:26 Why he favors a more regional European order 16:18 The limits of a unified European identity 19:28 Regional security zones and the future of Europe 21:30 Ukraine diplomacy and the US midterms 25:51 US debt, the unipolar moment, and military priorities 30:03 How drones and electronic warfare are changing combat 33:27 Defense spending, inflation, and the case for retrenchment 35:20 Tactical nuclear weapons and escalation risks 38:09 Iran, US influence, and the Middle East’s future 40:17 Turkey’s role as US influence recedes No political reality can exist inside any country that is not rooted in the history, culture and DNA of the population. You know, we have been pretending now certainly since the 60s that religion, language, culture, and race don’t matter. That man is a purely economic animal. That he responds to financial stimulus and not much else. This of course is the Marxist materialist view. It’s the globalist view that wants to treat humanity as mindless consumers who could be hurted in whatever direction the globalist leadership wants them to move. It’s very similar to bullsheism. That was ultimately the goal in 1918 1920 21. Now my point is simply this. That won’t work. the very things that they have set out to destroy and eliminate and eradicate are coming back to life. They are roaring back into the uh environment. Reminds me of a friend who was in Moscow when the Soviet Union Chapter 7: The limits of a unified European identity fell apart and I talked to him a few months later in 1992 and I [clears throat] said, “Well, what what happened?” And he told me and I said, “Well, what happened to the Soviet man? Don’t you remember the Soviet man who was going to emerge from these unwashed masses superseding any sort of national danger? They started burst out laughing. He said, “As soon as the Soviet Union fell apart, we had Russians, Ukrainians, uh, Lithuanians, Lafians, Estonians, Kazocks, Kirgeis, Turk, I mean just down the list. In other words, this whole dream of sort of suppressing all of that, destroying it, forcibly merging it into an amorphous mass fail. Well, that’s what’s happened in Europe. when when I was uh in Vienna to attend one of these OCE meetings about uh this is in 1998 and they were about what was going to happen over Kosovo and I had to dutifully go down there and brief and then sit and listen and pretend as though we were still looking for some sort of solution and did not simply want to bomb the Serbs when of course we were interested in bombing the Serbs.
SPECIAL GUEST Thomas Lipscomb – New York Times journalist, editor and in-house book publisher. Tom was the publisher of ‘Aftermath, Martin Bormann and the Forth Reich’ in 1970s which started the academic and professional public documentation of Adolf Hitler’s private secretary Martin Bormann who had done deals for the Nazi loot with the Allies at the and of World War Two – Tom Lipscomb is a prominent journalist and investigative reporter based in New York. He has held various leadership roles in major media companies and has been a key figure in the digital technology sector. Lipscombe is known for his investigative reporting and has been nominated for a Pulitzer Prize in 2005. He is also a senior fellow at the Annenberg Center for the Digital Future and has contributed to numerous publications, including The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, and The Washington Post. His work often addresses U.S. policy and publishing industry dynamics, making him a respected voice in the field of journalism. , 4th Reich, Ladislas Farago’s book Thick with documentation (Argentine Intelligence reports, photos of Bormann in the bunker, in Berlin, in Bolivia, of associates, of–even–Miss Nazi, of S. America, of ’68), this is an account of Farago’s odyssey, his journey thru jungles of Brazil & Paraguay, his trip to the Andean plateaus, his deductions, speculations, suspicions, interviews with Bormanniacs, riskings of his life–all to track down the highest ranking survivor of Nazism. Farago attempts to shoot holes in the Germanic version of Bormann’s death with his Fuhrer, which was based upon the discovery of an “obscure carcass” & a confusing dental picture (reproduced). There was something of a sensation raised when in ’72 the author 1st disclosed his findings, but it subsided as quickly as it rose. The problem with even this wealth of details being the general–& healthy–suspicion that doctoring, somewhere along the line, was possible. Farago feels that Bormann was protected by the Peronist government in the early & mid-50s; & not without sins of passivity on the part of the FBI–the tacit collusion a consequence of our need for pan-American alliance during the Cold War. This sounds plausible; yet it also sounds too easy. Farago explains what he considers Israel’s current disinterest as a matter of it’s ceased being an adventuring nation & has taken its place as a mature, compromising state. Again, plausible. Yet, the main ingredient is missing. The book ends with Farago discovering an old & senile Bormann at a hospital in SW Bolivia. But the palpable question how do we know?– Ladislas Farago was a military historian and journalist who published a number of best-selling books on history and espionage, especially concerning the World War II era. He was the author of Patton: Ordeal and Triumph, the biography of General George Patton that formed the basis for the film “Patton” and wrote The Broken Seal, one of the books that formed the basis for the movie ”Tora! Tora! Tora!”. One of his more controversial books was Aftermath: Martin Bormann and the Fourth Reich . Farago is a dependable historian of WWII, particularly as regards black operations, i.e. espionage. This book is more focused than most, being a personal, well-documented investigation of the whereabouts, if any, of Martin Ludwig Bormann, Hitler’s private secretary and Parteikanzlei head, after the defeat of Nazi Germany. Farago’s conclusion: he lived and settled in South America with the connivance of several dictatorships and the passivity of the United States of America. This conclusion is much debated. Martin Borman is alive and well and living in Argentina, at least as of 1974 when this book was published. Ladislas Farago, author of PATTON: ORDEAL AND TRIUMPH, the basis for the 1970 film, blew that one, but he scored a perfect 100 points in documenting the South American exile of Dr. Joseph Mengele, “the Angel of Death” and Klaus Barbie, “The Butcher of Lyon”. Mengele lived undercover, moving back and forth between the borders of Paraguay and Brazil. Farago even reproduces photographs from Brazilian magazines depicting a mustachoed Mengele. Barbie lived an underground life in Bolivia, where he used the torture techniques he had practiced on Jews and maquisards in France on political prisoners in his adopted land. All of this, Faraop claimed, took place under the supervision of the CIA and the indifference of the Israelis, who badly needed South American allies after the 1967 Six-Day War. Think of MARATHON MAN or THE BOYS FROM BRAZIL, but only for real. Mengele’s body, and post-1945 whereabouts, were not discovered until after Farago’s death, while Barbie got shipped back to France once he was no longer a valuable Cold War asset.
The Horrors Of Big Pharma 1 Antidepressants: Prescription For Murder, BBC Panorama (2017) Can Sertraline kill you and your friends and induce mass shootings? James Holmes 2012 shooting – Recent regulatory warnings about adverse behavioural effects of antidepressants in susceptible individuals have raised the profile of these issues with clinicians, patients, and the public. We review available clinical trial data on paroxetine and sertraline and pharmacovigilance studies of paroxetine and fluoxetine, and outline a series of medico-legal cases involving antidepressants and violence. Both clinical trial and pharmacovigilance data point to possible links between these drugs and violent behaviours. The legal cases outlined returned a variety of verdicts that may in part have stemmed from different judicial processes. Many jurisdictions appear not to have considered the possibility that a prescription drug may induce violence. The association of antidepressant treatment with aggression and violence reported here calls for more clinical trial and epidemiological data to be made available and for good clinical descriptions of the adverse outcomes of treatment. Legal systems are likely to continue to be faced with cases of violence associated with the use of psychotropic drugs, and it may fall to the courts to demand access to currently unavailable data. The problem is international and calls for an international response. In 1989, Joseph Wesbecker shot dead eight people and injured 12 others before killing himself at his place of work in Kentucky. Wesbecker had been taking the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) antidepressant fluoxetine for four weeks before these homicides, and this led to a legal action against the makers of fluoxetine, Eli Lilly. The case was tried and settled in 1994, and as part of the settlement a number of pharmaceutical company documents about drug-induced activation were released into the public domain. Subsequent legal cases, some of which are outlined below, have further raised the possibility of a link between antidepressant use and violence. The issue of treatment-related activation has since then been considered primarily in terms of possible increases in the risk of suicide among a subgroup of patients who react adversely to treatment. This possibility has led regulatory authorities to warn doctors about the risk of suicide in the early stages of treatment, at times of changing dosage, and during the withdrawal phase of treatment. Some regulators, such as the Canadian regulators, have also referred to risks of treatment-induced activation leading to both self-harm and harm to others [2]. The United States labels for all antidepressants as of August 2004 note that “anxiety, agitation, panic attacks, insomnia, irritability, hostility, aggressiveness, impulsivity, akathisia (psychomotor restlessness), hypomania, and mania have been reported in adult and pediatric patients being treated with antidepressants for major depressive disorder as well as for other indications, both psychiatric and nonpsychiatric”. Despite these developments, few data are available on the links between antidepressant usage and violence. We here offer new data, review the implications of these data, and summarise a series of medico-legal cases. This paper focuses on paroxetine primarily because we have access to more illustrative medico-legal case material for this drug than for other antidepressants. Secondly, the manufacturer, GlaxoSmithKline, submitted data on the rates of occurrence of “hostile” episodes on paroxetine for the recent review of antidepressant drugs undertaken by the British regulator. It is not clear that the review team obtained comparable data for other antidepressants. The data submitted by GlaxoSmithKline on paroxetine for review by the Committee on Safety of Medicines Expert Working Group are described as a complete set of data from all placebo-controlled trials of this drug. The use of this dataset thus involves no selection by the authors, and any selection bias there might have been on the part of the company seems unlikely to have increased the size of the problem. Data from placebo-controlled trials of sertraline in children are also presented, as these also offer a complete dataset, so minimising any selection bias. E-mails from 1,374 patients in response to a BBC programme on paroxetine broadcast in 2002. One of us (AH) had the opportunity to analyse a complete set of these responses. In paroxetine clinical trials, aggression and violence were commonly coded under the rubric of hostility. This coding term includes homicide, homicidal acts, and homicidal ideation as well as aggressive events and “conduct disorders”, but no homicides were reported from these trials. The material posted on the company Web site suggests that these hostile behaviours in children primarily involved aggression rather than frank violence. When hostile events occurring in both adult and paediatric trials are summed, both on therapy and during the 30-day drug-free phase after taper had finished, 60 (0.65%) of 9,219 patients overall had hostile events. Table 1 shows the results.
BIG PHARMA, Andrew Wakefield – Infertility Uncensored – With Dr Tess Lawrie Once you start censoring yourself in that way, then what you’re doing is subverting yourself to the will of the system that wants to believe otherwise rather than entertaining an entirely reasonable idea that three viruses, measles, mumps, and reubella put together in combination each of which is on its own capable of causing in encphilitis, brain inflammation. Is it possible that this unique combination is in some way triggering this particular pattern of pathology in he brain and regression into autism? So the parent and this is extremely important that on all of those aspects like the no regression my you know the psychiatrist saying there’s no such thing as regression. It starts in the womb. It’s a genetic problem. There’s no epidemic. We’re just getting better at making the diagnosis. There’s no bowel disease in children with autism. They don’t respond positively to the diet. Um the parents were right on every single aspect. The doctors were completely wrong. You could burn down the libraries of books written by the experts and God save us from experts. I mean co has taught us. God save us from experts. But medicine was wrong. Completely wrong. So when they said, “My child regressed after an MMR,” and they’ve been proven right on each of these other aspects, you’ve got a moral and professional obligation to investigate that, not to say, “Oh, you’re just looking for an excuse.” How demeaning. You don’t really know your child even though his mother and the mother pet child relationship is sustained us since the start of life on this planet and is the reason that we’re here now. The greatest selection evolutionary advantage we have is a mother’s knowledge of her child. But the pediatrician knows better. No, he doesn’t. He has no idea. So if I’m going to invest my trust in someone, it’s going to be in the mother or the father and not in the in the doctors. It is extraordinary to reflect on how the vaccine schedule has changed and and really been um you know escalated. I I was learning in this great book, I must just give a shout out, the ultimate vaccine timeline. It’s just been published by Shaz Khan. It’s years and years and years of work. It’s like an encyclopedia. Um, but you know, I was learning that in actual fact, um, it was only these these vaccine schedules only really started in the ‘9s, you know, where where the vaccines were sort of, well, here’s a new one, let’s add this one, and let’s add this one. And so, um, I’m certainly that generation where my children had a lot of vaccines. Not as many as they get today, but certainly more than I I would have liked. and um and that has been good for them. So that you know it hasn’t been good for them. So um I think we are a generation there was the generation before us that perhaps um you know were were not so vaccinated and it wasn’t so entrenched but now it’s sort of it’s every every you know every possible uh infectious disease identified has to have a jab and it’s somehow given in the first uh first few years. Yes, I think with there’s a very good reason for this and now I mean it used to be that there were just a few vaccines on the schedule and now it’s in America there are 100 vaccines 100 shots by the time you are 18 years of age and it came about because and I I’m sure many people know this but um there was a lot of litigation in respect of the old patus vaccine which was causing brain damage in children and the industry said, “The margins on this are really trivial. We’re not making money. We’re getting sued for brain damage and death. And therefore, we’re going to quit making vaccines if you, the government, under Ronald Reagan, do not give us liability protection from death and injury caused by vaccines on the childhood schedule.” And they won. The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act passed in ‘ 86 gave them exempted them from liability for death and injury. So at this stage they had a perfect business model. They had a mandatory market. Children had to get these vaccines to go to school and they had no liability. There was no downside. And so they thought as they do well we can expand the vaccine program dramatically get these vaccines recommended on the schedule and we have no liability. And we saw this with COVID under the PREP act, a different act, but no liability…
UKRAINE’S TORTURE PRISON PROTESTS 1 Gonzalo Lira, I’m about to cross the border. The tragic end of Gonzalo Lira: A voice silenced in Ukraine 13 January 2024 Gonzalo Lira, a Chilean-American war commentator known for his critical views on the Zelensky regime and Russia-Ukraine conflict, passed away on January 11, 2024, in a hospital in Kharkiv, Ukraine. Lira’s death followed an eight-month imprisonment on charges of ”justifying Russia’s military actions in Ukraine”, sparking international controversy and raising questions about freedom of speech and human rights during wartime. Gonzalo Lira gained notoriety in 2022 as a vocal critic of what he perceived as increasing authoritarianism in Ukraine. Lira saw the conflict as a proxy war waged by US against Russia and critisised the loss of life for a futile and unwindable war. His arrest in May 2023, under the charges of “production and dissemination of materials justifying Russia’s armed aggression against Ukraine,” was a turning point. It not only highlighted the complexities of war-time free speech but also catalysed opposition movements against US funding for the conflict. High-profile figures like tech mogul Elon Musk and Fox News host Tucker Carlson called for his release, bringing global attention to his case. The news of Lira’s deteriorating health emerged from communications between his father, Gonzalo Lira Sr., and the US embassy. Documents and emails revealed attempts by Lira Sr. to alert the embassy about his son’s critical condition and the lack of transparency from Ukrainian authorities regarding his health status. “I cannot accept the way my son has died. He was tortured, extorted, incommunicado for 8 months and 11 days and the US Embassy did nothing to help my son,” Lira Sr. stated in an email announcing the news. “The responsibility of this tragedy is [with] the dictator Zelensky with the concurrence of a senile American President, Joe Biden,” he wrote, adding: “My pain is unbearable. The world must know what is going on in Ukraine with that inhuman dictator Zelensky.” In a poignant hand written note, Lira described his health ordeal, including double pneumonia, pneumothorax, and severe oedema. This letter, believed to be his last written correspondence, detailed the neglect he faced in prison. Despite these alarming symptoms, proper medical attention was reportedly delayed until it was too late.
UKRAINE’S TORTURE PRISON PROTESTS 2 Security Forces fire shots, protests at Kiev torture prison, police shots to disperse protest crowd Protesters clash with forces over torture chamber scandal near Kiev A torture and unlawful detention scandal erupted near Kiev after reports that Ukrainian servicemen were being beaten and held against their will in a private house in Petropavlovskaya Borshchagovka used by the National Guard. A woman posing as a private ambulance operator was denied access; reports of dozens held and tortured in the basement drew around 100 protesters. The property was a temporary facility of Ukraine’s 1st Azov* Corps. Azov confirmed newly mobilised troops and AWOL servicemen were there, but denied a torture facility. Four men were hospitalised. Relatives accused personnel of beatings, unlawful detention and extortion — one woman said her husband was held 37 days and she was asked for $2,200 to visit him. Protesters clashed with security forces; police vehicles were damaged and gunfire was reported. Kyrylo Budanov* and Oleksandr Pivnenko arrived. A 14-year-old boy who entered the property said masked men beat him. Two women linked to the events were detained. Authorities opened investigations into military misconduct and the unrest. As of November 5, police identified 130 people involved. Torture and extortion claims have not been established. Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova said Ukraine has many such facilities and Zelensky’s government relies on them to stay in power. Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov criticised the West for shielding Kiev.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GssD1UF1ij8
Adil Raja on UK Pakistan agreement to combat disinformation November 2026 Pakistan’s Foreign Office proudly announces cooperation with the UK on combating online propaganda, social media activity and emerging technologies. But whose definition of “propaganda” and “terrorism” are we talking about? When a state is accused of criminalising dissent, intimidating journalists, persecuting political opponents and targeting critics abroad, its demands for cooperation on online speech deserve exceptional scrutiny. Will British authorities distinguish genuine terrorist threats from peaceful political criticism? Will they safeguard UK-based journalists, dissidents and human rights defenders against politically motivated allegations originating from Pakistan? The UK must never allow legitimate counterterrorism cooperation to become a backdoor mechanism for surveillance, censorship or intimidation of people exercising their fundamental rights. Fighting terrorism is a legitimate responsibility. Silencing critics of those in power is not. And if Pakistan’s authorities want to discuss online propaganda, perhaps they should first explain why criticism of powerful generals is so often treated as a national security threat. Islamabad, London pledge deeper security cooperation Pakistan and the UK on Wednesday held their annual Counterterrorism (CT) dialogue, reaffirming their commitment to strengthening bilateral and multilateral cooperation to combat terrorism in all its forms and manifestations. According to a statement issued by the Foreign Office Spokesperson, both sides reviewed ongoing cooperation in counterterrorism at bilateral and multilateral forums. The two sides held detailed and constructive discussion on the evolving global and regional security environment and exchanged views on the threats posed by terrorist entities, including transnational terrorist networks. Both sides expressed concerns over the continuing threat posed by terrorist groups, including the TTP, operating in and from Afghanistan, underscoring the urgent need for a stable, secure Afghanistan as a cornerstone for lasting peace and prosperity across the region. Both sides also reviewed ongoing bilateral and multilateral cooperation in counter-terrorism and reaffirmed their shared commitment to combating terrorism in all its forms and manifestations. The dialogue also focused on exchange of best practices and exploring new avenues for partnership to counter new trends in terrorism including misinformation/disinformation campaigns, exploitation of social media platforms and emerging technologies. During the discussion both sides acknowledged Pakistan’s contributions to regional stability and security. Pakistan and the UK agreed to strengthen institutional linkages and maintain regular engagement to advance shared counter-terrorism objectives.
Chartist Cave Walk 2026 Trefil nr Tredegar, Wales – discussion Steve Drowley, David Daniel, Our Chartist Heritage, Saturday 31st October 2026 The People’s Charter – Votes for men over the age of 21, Secret ballots, Payment for MPs, Equal size constituencies, No property qualification for MPs, Annual parliaments – A great day out exploring the landscape and history around the Chartist Caves, taking in Trefil Quarry and an ancient burial cairn along the way. Thank you to Steve Drowley for another fascinating guided walk, and to everyone who joined us. There’s always so much to learn on these walks — from the Chartist history to the conversations along the way, with people sharing their knowledge of archaeology, fungi, birds and all sorts in between. A perfect warm-up for next weekend’s Newport Rising Torchlit March, Chartist Convention and Radical Book Fair. Guided walk to Chartist caves, Trefil with qualified mountain guide. Trefil Road, Trefil Rd, Tredegar NP22, UK Leader: Steve Drowley – Grade: Moderate PLEASE NOTE: Walkers are advised to wear walking boots, waterproofs and bring water and packed lunch. Meeting point is at Quarry men’s Arms pub, Trefil at 10am for a 10:30 start. Steve Drowley is a qualified mountain leader but all walkers join us at their own risk and are responsible for their own safety. Under 18s must be accompanied by a parent or guardian. A guided walk to the Chartist Cave, also known by two Welsh names; Ogof Fawr (the ‘Big Cave’) and earlier as Tylles Fawr (the ‘Great Hole’). The more commonly used modern name “Chartist Cave” dates from 1839 when Chartist reformers used the cave to stockpile weapons in advance of their march on Newport on 4th November of that year. There is a plaque at the entrance to the cave commemorating the actions of the Chartists. A guided walk looking at the archaeology of upland Blaenau Gwent. The walk will take in the industrial archaeology associated with the Trefil Quarries (established 1794), the Duke’s Table, the Brinore tramroad (1814-15), prehistoric burial mounds, medieval hafotai, a horizontal mill and the famous (but elusive) Chartists’ Cave.
Radio4All download pages
COMPLETE SHOW AND FULL INTERVIEWS [right click to download]
#1 – Complete 4hr show – [right click to download]
Full interviews with…
#2 – EXCLUSIVE Adil Raja on UK Pakistan agreement to combat disinformation Nov26 – 00:20:00
#3 – BANNED Are Antidepressent Drugs Causing Suicide and Mass Shootings, Prescription For Murder BBC Panorama (2017) – 01:00:00
#4 – Andrew Wakefield Uncensored In Bath Big Pharma Vs Humanity with Dr Tess Lawrie – 01:30:00
#5 – MIGRATION Lucy Powell Lab, Luke Evans Con, Paul Nowak TUC, Tim Stanley, John Amaechi, BBC Question Time – 00:20:00
#6 – Jeffrey Sachs on Netanyahu’s Struggle to Keep Control of the Worlds Most Bloodthirsty Ethnostate – End Of Days – 00:50:00
#7 – Douglas Macgregor_Glenn_Diesen_US Empire in Retreat Revolution in Europe – The Cost of Strategic Failure – 00:40:00
The Bristol Politics Show CANCELLED and attempts to intimidate us
July 2024 – Tony, Dave and Martin’s NOT The BCfm Politics show was CANCELLED/EVICTED from their PRSC studio in a no fault, no notice, no appeal, eviction by Chloe Slater of The People’s Republic of Stokes Croft (PRSC) arts centre – An email from Chloe and Keith Cowling explained that: ‘Transphobic’ leaflets, which we were not shown, had been left in the building by a recent guest (who denied it) making Transsexual users of the building feel ‘offended’ and ‘unsafe’. To quote: ‘Please let us know when you or Dave would like to come and retrieve your equipment and drop off your keys. Kind regards’ PRSC Directors (Keith Cowling, chair) PRSC / Stokes Croft China 17-35 Jamaica St Bristol BS2 8JP. Chloe Slater (formerly young man Jez and now self-defined as ‘she’) also made it difficult for us to retrieve the last of our equipment by inferring we couldn’t be trusted, we were made to wait in the cold outside their building for over 30 minutes to return their mixing desk and retrieve our remaining kit in December 2024.
[UPDATE channel restored by YT in July 2025] October 2022 – Tony’s Public Enquiry Channel opened in March 2008, with 13 million views, over 1,600 videos and 26,000 subscribers is removed under false pretences by YouTube – A video Tony recorded in New Zealand ‘Bill Gates, ID2020 & Revelation: Quaker Tony Gosling on Covid 19 & the Bible’ and uploaded on 8th April 2020 got a ‘third strike’ but YouTube’s ‘medical misinformation’ regime was introduced in September 2021 so should not have included as ‘strikes’ videos uploaded before that date. Documentary makers are just about the only public interest investigators left in the NATO zone. From the top down, our mainstream media, police, political parties & intelligence services are being compromised by feudal banksters, secret societies and the mafia. Key people intimidated by psychopathic black magic types and their pliable drones who will even kill to take over positions of power? Just search for “John Scarlett” and “Dodgy Dossier” and you’ll see what I mean. The Zionists are every bit as fundamentalist and twisted as the leaders and followers of ISIS. Register here and join us in the discussion as we wriggle free of the psychopaths, back to sanity http://www.911forum.org.uk
March 2020 – BCfm’s weekly Politics Show presented by Tony Gosling with Irish Republican Labour activist Martin Summers was forced off FM, now online only by station manager Pat Hart. He decided the show should be ‘rested, due to the pandemic’ on 24 March 2020 and then refused to communicate at all when we requested to do the show remotely. Bristol Community FM (BCfm) charity ‘CEO’ Patrick Hart is a long-time personal friend of Bristol’s all-powerful right-wing ‘Labour’ mayor Marvin Rees. Pat Hart has a private property portfolio on the continent and also does Public Relations work for property speculators who are taking over community facilities such as Redfield Cinema. Now on Internet only NOT The BCfm Politics Show is available 17:00-c. 20:00 live on Fridays. Pat Hart replaced us with a dumbed-down student show repeating MSM stories called The Bristol Agenda. If you’d like to share your views on his deliberate dumbing-down and pro-Covid jab mismanagement you can contact UK broadcasting regulator Ofcom or BCfm board chair and the ‘Don’ himself, here.
February 2019 – Ofcom complaint result: UKLFI exposed as creation of Israeli foreign ministry – Bristol Post article: BCfm cleared after being reported to Ofcom for anti-semitic conspiracy theories – It could have resulted in BCfm radio station being shut down if the complaint was upheld Tony Gosling reported to Ofcom by UK Lawyers for Israel after being accused of anti-semitism A Bristol radio station, which had one of its programmes reported for anti-semitism and racism has been cleared by Ofcom. The radio regulatory body received a complaint from “UK Lawyers for Israel’ over a show on BCfm radio, hosted by investigative journalist Tony Gosling. The weekly politics show, on the popular community radio station based in Easton, was reported for several allegations on a show which aired on November 23. Tony Gosling, who was a former BBC journalist between 1989 and 1993, has been producing and presenting ‘The Tony Gosling Politics’ show every week on BCFM radio for 11 years. They have released a statement which reads: “Whilst we are supportive of all our volunteer presenters, The Tony Gosling Politics Show only represents approximately ten percent of our political output content wise, and less than two per cent of our entire weekly output.” Mr Gosling’s programme looks at local politics and he interviews a range of councillors and MPs in the city. The show is also perhaps more well known for its alternative look at international politics, and he has a cult following online from across the world. Mr Gosling has made regular appearances on national media including the politics show with Andrew Neil on BBC One, and international channels such as Russia Today, Channel1 Russia, NTV, and recently for both Turkish and Lebanon TV.
November 2012 – Tony gets death threats on the phone from the Jewish Defence League – ‘you’re a dead man walking’ – a man calls him and Tony records the call. Audio of UK Jewish Defence League (JDL) death threat against British journalist Tony Gosling (2012) – Avon and Somerset police Special Branch investigate, trace the caller, and after six months report to Tony that the individual has been served a caution that they will proceed with a prosecution for harassment under the 1861 offences against the person act. Seems pretty clear this death threat was issued alongside the lies, copied below, which were published on their blog by London based UK JDL in November 2012. Firstly Tony Gosling is not a ‘homophobe’. That accusation was first made in an article published by the ‘Harry’s Place’ blog, penned by Zionist David Toube and propelled by him anonymously into Private Eye in 2008. It refers to Gosling’s criticism of senior teachers at Bannerman Road Primary school in Bristol who used homosexual early learning picture books against the express wishes of the parent governors. His criticism was about the deception by teaching staff not because of the homosexual content of the books. Secondly, if you follow the JDL link you’ll find what Tony Gosling actually says about the ‘Protocols Of The Learned Elders Of Zion’ says “…I don’t think there is much doubt that the Protocols are fake…” Thirdly he is not a member of Bristol Palestine Solidarity Campaign and has never been to any of their meetings.
Autumn 2014 – Tony’s documentary production and distribution business shut down by its bank. Our thriving Co-op business bank account ordered closed for undisclosed reasons. Tony Gosling and Ben Edwards founded i-Contact Video Network to distribute documentaries on VHS video and DVD and to make their own documentaries as well as attend news events and sell video footage to TV news channels. Amongst the films we distributed were Operation Solstice, Coconut Revolution, Mark Purdey and Organophosphates, McLibel, 9/11 In Plane Site, Ludicrous Diversion and The Battle of Trafalgar. These, plus books, and even a board game about drug dealing ‘Dollars and Dibble’, were all available via mail order and we supplied libraries around the world too. The bank had clearly been ordered to investigate us for money laundering, although they never admitted it. All the questions they asked Ben and I were about proving our identity through passports etc.. When we did, yet more letters kept arriving demanding more proofs, birth certificates etc. and eventually when one of us missed supplying the required information, within a week or so of being asked, the account was summarily closed and we got a cheque made out to one of us with the few hundred pounds that was in the business bank account. Since neither of us could get a business bank account up and running for at least a few months and the bank account meant nobody could any longer use the website, we made the reluctant decision to shut it down. Thus was a thriving business killed off by the Co_operative bank. Having said that, co-op were not quite the worst. We did apply to open an account at Bristol’s ‘ethical’ Triodos bank, who proceeded to string us along for several months and then said our business was too risky for them to provide an account!
$6.3 Billion Crypto Ponzi Scheme Robbery – 
