Radio4All mp3 audio files usually available from 23:00 2-4hrs, after TX – we’ll credit you if you rebroadcast. Any probs. mp3s should be on alternative links below by then
Part One – Local and National News Review
Since then the story has produced many sinister new twists, including: Pentagon whistleblowers have accused the ‘Independent 9/11 Commission’ of lying; long-suppressed eyewitness testimony has been released confirming multiple explosions in the Twin Towers before and during their collapses; the much vaunted video purporting to prove that Flight 77 hit the Pentagon showed nothing at all; and an analysis of terrorist trials and arrests since 2001 indicates that far from the ‘600 Al Qaeda sleeper cells in the US’ (CIA) there were none at all. In this sequel to 9/11 Revealed, Ian Henshall examines the precedents of black operations by the US/UK, from Northern Ireland to Italy, from Vietnam to Kosovo; he looks at the various 9/11 theories, including the latest twists in the official story, and tests them against the evidence. Finally, he asks what might happen when the storm of popular outrage collides with the regime in Washington and London and outlines the radical changes needed if Washington and London are ever again to function as genuine democracies. In this expanded version of ‘9/11 Revealed’ Ian Henshall examines the precedents of black operations by the US/UK, from Northern Ireland to Italy, from Vietnam to Kosovo; he looks at the various 9/11 theories, including the latest twists in the official story, and tests them against the evidence. An eminent analysis of the 9/11 attacks are the works of David Ray Griffin. However, this book contains excellent graphic material (contradicting the official version of the facts) and sketches a good overall framework (`the big picture’). On our planet, the top third of its inhabitants enjoy a relative prosperity often based on overwork, while the rest lives in traditional poverty or in a real living hell. Within the top third, a plutocracy, a Global Dominance Group of some 200 people (P. Phillips), pulls the strings in the ongoing fight for wealth and power in the western world, helped by governments, the media conglomerates and the military and intelligence communities controlled by it. After the fall of the Berlin Wall, the oligarchy needed a new enemy for the consolidation and the expansion of its power base. Communism was replaced by terrorism. Ian Henshall sees the `war on terror’ as a tactical weapon in the fight for the extension of the wealth and power of the plutocrats. After the 9/11 attacks centuries-old democratic rights were hollowed out. The presidential power was enhanced by giving the president the right to override the Constitution in times of war (on terror). But, the author also sees a Washington oligarchy confronted with a crisis of unpopularity. Moreover, only 16 % of the US population believes the entire official version of the 9/11 massacre. He rightly calls for a major criminal investigation by an independent Criminal Commission of all aspects of the events.
Version 1.0.0 Operation Gladio: NATO history of false flag attacks. Daniele Ganser book. Richard Cotterell book. For the past 40 years, teams of secret agents have bombed and murdered scores of innocent civilians to keep control of Europe for their political masters. Developed from “stay behinds”–Nazis who remained in occupied territories at the end of World War 2 to resist the communist threat–this secret network changed from being defenders of state security into attackers of the established political order. It’s only since the Gladio’s existence was acknowledged in 1990 that the impact of its shadowy role in post-war Europe has emerged This fascinating new study shows how the CIA and the British secret service, in collaboration with the military alliance NATO and European military secret services, set up a network of clandestine anti-communist armies in Western Europe after World War II. These secret soldiers were trained on remote islands in the Mediterranean and in unorthodox warfare centres in England and in the United States by the Green Berets and SAS Special Forces. The network was armed with explosives, machine guns and high-tech communication equipment hidden in underground bunkers and secret arms caches in forests and mountain meadows. In some countries the secret army linked up with right-wing terrorist who in a secret war engaged in political manipulation, harrassement of left wing parties, massacres, coup d’états and torture. Codenamed ‘Gladio’ (‘the sword’), the Italian secret army was exposed in 1990 by Italian Prime Minister Giulio Andreotti to the Italian Senate, whereupon the press spoke of “The best kept, and most damaging, political-military secret since World War II” (Observer, 18. November 1990) and observed that “The story seems straight from the pages of a political thriller.” (The Times, November 19, 1990). Ever since, so-called ‘stay-behind’ armies of NATO have also been discovered in France, Spain, Portugal, Germany, Belgium, the Netherlands, Luxemburg, Denmark, Norway, Sweden, Finland, Switzerland, Austria, Greece and Turkey. They were internationally coordinated by the Pentagon and NATO and had their last known meeting in the NATO-linked Allied Clandestine Committee (ACC) in Brussels in October 1990. A seminal work in which Danielle Ganser provides us with the coordinates to help us put things like the so-called War On Terror into their proper contexts. He shows that the majority (if not all) of the western European governments, supposedly democratic in nature, have engaged in activities which can only be described as undemocratic since the end of WWII. The necessity to “prevent the spread of Communism” is an invalid question when examined from the standpoint of the democratic will; for if the majority favour Communism then, theoretically, that is what democracy is all about. And there can be no question of degrees; democracy either exists or it does not. Like free speech, you cannot have democracy up to a point. That there has since the 1990s been little public accountability (despite public acknowledgement that the activities did take place) raises crucially important questions about the validity of the War On Terror, British involvement in Northern Ireland and elsewhere, and many other similar occupations and internal conflicts as well as many of the events which have been attributed to “terrorists” over the past decade or so. For not only do we not know that the countries involved actually dismantled the stay-behind armies in the 1990s, we don’t know which countries ran stay-behind armies in each others’ countries – and whether these were likewise dismantled. In fact, the main protagonists (the UK & USA) have so far refused to comment. Whilst many would argue that this is essential to protect national security, this argument, when examined logically, is baseless. For if we truly do live in democracies then no government should be above the law. And when supposedly-demoractic governments encourage – or turn a blind eye to – actions which are undeniably anti-democratic then it would seem to stand to reason that we actually don’t live in democracies at all. Danielle Ganser has added one more link into an ever-strengthening chain of evidence that democracy truly does not exist. A truly disturbing story; this is history that everyone should know.
For the average guy on the street, no doubt this book is interesting – but boy, is it hard going! For those already aware of the false “facts” about 911 and already interested an absolute MUST BUY as it really is the greatest compendium about 911. For those who are just interested – buy something like Paul Joseph Watsons “Order out of Chaos” to whet your apetite. For Tarpley, terrorism is synthetic: composed by patsies lead by deception, moles, professionals, mediamen, controllers. It is sponsored by states, organized and directed by a rogue network of high government, intelligence and military officials together with foreign agencies. It is controlled by an aggressive, imperialistic, murderous oligarchy/plutocracy, which restlessly seeks to preserve its privileges through conflict and confrontation: war, violence, hatred, coups, martial law, terrorism, manipulation. The dollar’s reserve status is the true heart of US international arrogance. It was attacked by Saddam Hussein, when he asked to be paid in euros for his oil. Another very serious threat is secular Arab nationalism, which could overthrow loyal fundamentalist Islamic regimes in the Middle East. Progressive nationalists in the Arab world are and have been relentlessly victims of terrorist attacks. His analysis of the 9/11 events is profound: options insider trading, the collapse of three towers while only two where hit, planes flown by remote control?, who were the hijackers? Are some still alive?, no scrambling of the planes!). It is partly based on the books of Nafeez Mosaddeq Ahmed, Michel Chossudovsky, Thierry Meyssan and David Ray Griffin). Tarpley points courageously his finger at financiers, top-level bureaucrats, flag-rank military officers, top intelligence officials and technical specialists, calling them ‘technocrats of death’. They profited highly from the 9/11 attacks and created a new world of preventive and pre-emptive war, of first use of nuclear weapons, of unilateral aggression, of barbarian racism and hatred, of the glorification of violence and killing, of force and the threat of force. The advice of the Bush regime to the American people is: ‘Be afraid! Always!’. W. G. Tarpley’s research stands in sharp contrast with the mainstream media, clearly gagged by the powerful and paralyzed by autocensure. They know all too well that truth is dangerous for the masses. Therefore, their key-word is ‘omertà’. This book is a powerful exposé of a world dominated by not democratically controlled, cynical and deadly intelligence networks. A really frightening analysis.
https://youtu.be/rbZsoCuPD-w?t=145
“Seconds after the first massive explosion below in the basement still rattled the floor, I hear another explosion from way above,” said Rodriguez. “Although I was unaware at the time, this was the airplane hitting the tower, it occurred moments after the first explosion.” But before Rodriguez had time to think, coworker Felipe David stormed into the basement office with severe burns on his face and arms, screaming for help and yelling “explosion! explosion! explosion!” David had been in front of a nearby freight elevator on sub-level 1 about 400 feet from the office when fire burst out of the elevator shaft, causing his injuries. “He was burned terribly,” said Rodriguez. “The skin was hanging off his hands and arms. His injuries couldn’t have come from the airplane above, but only from a massive explosion below. I don’t care what the government says, what scientists say. I saw a man burned terribly form a fire that was caused from an explosion below. “I know there were explosives placed below the trade center. I helped a man to safety who is living proof, living proof the government story is a lie and a cover-up… “I disagree 100% with the government story, ” said Rodriguez. “I met with the 9/11 Commission behind closed doors and they essentially discounted everything I said regarding the use of explosives to bring down the north tower. “And I contacted NIST previously four times without a response. Finally, this week I asked them before they came up with their conclusion that jet fuel brought down the towers, if they ever considered my statements or the statements of an other survivors who heard explosions. They just stared at me with blank faces and didn’t have an answers. William Rodriguez, formerly an American Building Maintenance employee for twenty years, was responsible for inspection and maintenance at the World Trade Center and held the master key for the stairs, He was the last person to leave the building on September 11 and has been credited with saving many lives. For his efforts, he received the National Hero Award from the Senate of Puerto Rico. Since September 11, Mr. Rodriguez has been very active in all aspects of the relief efforts, including the memorial, the federal fund and the charities, as well as appearing before many government officials on such topics. William Rodriguez, janitor with a master key, helped save lives at the World Trade Center on 9/11 Titles are generated by AI from Meta 911 – HE WAS THE JANITOR – And on September 11, 2001 the key in his pocket suddenly became one of the most important keys in America. His name was William Rodriguez. He had worked at the World Trade Center for roughly 20 years. That morning, Rodriguez was in the basement of the North Tower when American Airlines Flight 11 struck the building. Chaos erupted. A badly burned man appeared. Rodriguez helped him. Then he could have gotten out. He went back … Because Rodriguez had something almost nobody else in that building had: A MASTER KEY ?? It opened the stairwell doors throughout the North Tower. Firefighters and police were rushing into a building thousands of terrified people were trying to escape. Rodriguez knew the building. And he had the key. So he went UP with the rescuers. Floor after floor. Door after door. Unlock. Open. Keep moving. People were coming down. Rodriguez kept going up. He reportedly made it as high as the 39th floor before firefighters ordered him to turn around. Think about that. The building had been struck by a passenger jet. Smoke was spreading. People were desperately trying to get OUT. And the janitor was climbing farther INSIDE. Rodriguez eventually made it back down and survived. But approximately 200 people he knew at the World Trade Center did not. 25 years later he still carries the memories of that morning. And he still has the master key. We remember the firefighters. We remember the police officers. We remember the passengers who fought back. ??We should also remember the janitor with the key. William Rodriguez wasn’t carrying a badge. He wasn’t carrying a weapon. He was carrying something much simpler. A key. And when America was attacked, he used what he had to help save whoever he could. Never forget William Rodriguez.
VIDEO
But 911: In Plane Site is the first DVD that I’ve seen that asks questions about some of the weird anomalies left amidst the wreckage and debris of that day. The roughly seventy-five minute-long main program is hosted by Dave vonKleist, the plain-talking host of the conspiracy-minded “Power Hour.” VonKleist takes what could in less delicate hands come off as paranoid and deluded and makes it curiously fascinating. This program features no bells or whistles: It simply places the host in front of a bank of monitors and allows him to point out strange contradictions in the generally accepted facts about September 11th. Among these inconsistencies are the size of the hole in the Pentagon’s outer wall (which apparently would not have allowed for a plane of that size), the nature of the damage to the building, and the lack of visible plane debris. VonKleist shows a study released by the American Society of Civil Engineers that leaves out crucial information like reinforced beams in the Pentagon’s walls and the plane’s tail, seemingly negating their findings. He points out clearly visible computers and books that should have been destroyed in the impact but are perfectly fine in the photos. And he plays countless eye-witness reports that make it seem more like a missile hit the Pentagon. He also shows numerous photos of the plane about to strike the south tower of the World Trade Center – images we’ve seen literally thousands of times before – but he points out a strange protrusion on the belly of the plane. This, taken along with eyewitness accounts pulled from news footage claiming that the plane had no windows and no commercial markings, seems to suggest that the plane was actually a military plane. As if things weren’t weird enough, vonKleist points out an instantaneous flash at the front of the plane the moment before it strikes the tower. I figured that this was a reflection glancing off the plane on that sunny day, but vonKleist shows that the flash is visible from four different angles, thanks to the incredible media coverage of the second WTC crash. Then he uses the one known video shot of the first collision (from the Naudet brothers’ 9/11) to show that the flash is present there too.
VIDEO
We were told that the Pentagon was hit by a Boeing 757. We were told that flight 93 crashed in Shanksville, Pennsylvania. We were told that nineteen Arabs from halfway across the globe, acting under orders from Osama Bin Laden, were responsible. What you will see here will prove without a shadow of a doubt that everything you know about 9/11 is a complete fabrication. Conspiracy theory? It’s not a theory if you can prove it.Written and narrated by Dylan Avery, this film presents a rebuttal to the official version of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks and the 9/11 Commission Report. Why it matters… Today’s Freshmen in High School will be learning about the events of September 11th, 2001 as an event that happened before they were born. Yet, the relevance of 9/11 echoes through our lives to this day. It is impossible to avoid the places we as a nation have gone. Scars and open wounds stain our stars and stripes. We must understand that what we were told about that day is a lie and those lies drastically changed the course of peace to a course of perpetual war. How many more people need to die until we realize a reevaluation of the day’s events is needed? Loose Change was created as a voice for the victims of September 11th, 2001, to ask the questions they were robbed of the ability to ask about their fate. A new investigation into the events of that fateful day can give context to the perils we fight today. It’s not too late. Ask questions, demand answers. The film, presented against a synth-pop soundtrack, argues that a small cabal of top-level neocons executed the attacks as a pretext for the invasion of Iraq, the control of Middle Eastern oil fields and a massive increase in American military power. Its lines of argument include the theory that a missile and not a commercial airplane hit the Pentagon, and that United Flight 93 did not crash in Pennsylvania but instead landed safely in Cleveland — or was perhaps blown up or shot down. The filmmakers can’t say for sure. “Loose Change” — the title refers to the idea that political change is on the move — relies on news footage and press reports, including many early-response stories from the hours immediately following the attacks. Comments from witnesses and on-the-scene television reports describing “explosions,” for example, are used to support one of the film’s central theories, that the twin towers were rigged with explosives. “There are some concrete issues that everyone agrees on that are irrefutable,” Avery said in an interview before the screening, ” … and (one of them) is the controlled demolition of the World Trade Center.” By “everyone,” Avery means himself and others in the self-proclaimed “9/11 Truth Movement,” which includes radio hosts, academics and amateur Internet investigators here and abroad.
VIDEO
He was also on the scene when migrants arrived in Portsmouth on Sunday. Interrupting Mr Yusuf during an interview in the city, Mr Thomas accused Mr Farage of calling protesters at the Unite the Kingdom rally in London earlier in the year “knuckle-draggers”. He said: “You have to tell Nigel… we had a million people on the streets of London in every colour, every creed, every background, every ethnicity… he called us knuckle-draggers. “I understand Nigel is going to be prime minister one day and I understand he has to set a standard, which will basically be that you know he can’t just come out and say everything’s great and these guys are fantastic, but Nigel needs to be very careful with his words.” Mr Yusuf told Mr Thomas to ensure there was no violence from his group towards the police. Reform UK’s home affairs spokesman said: “I just want to make that really clear, just so that we’re really clear about this, right? There is never any excuse for violence against police officers who are doing their job. They are taking orders, and that is what it is.” Mr Thomas said there was no violence in Dover and, when questioned about his group’s masks and attire being intimidating, said: “The reason people felt potentially intimidated was because of the faces covered. I’ve made that point very clear. “The only reason they’ve done that is because no-one wants to be labelled far right.” Mr Thomas founded the group Patriot Platform in July, promoting it as a project to build “a mighty patriotic army”, partly to push back against migrants arriving in the UK by small boat. Mr Thomas has openly recruited supporters using social media, but his protest action planned at Dover appears to have come as a surprise to the authorities, with Kent Police claiming it was “spontaneous”. Livestreaming while standing in the sea at Portsmouth on Sunday, he said: “Roads are all blocked, they are never going to be able to leave here.” He added: “It was only yesterday (at the protests in Dover) when we warned them that we will not accept this any more, and that this is no longer an option to tell us that the boat numbers are down.” Some eight boats carrying 625 people arrived in the UK having crossed the English Channel on Sunday, Home Office data shows.
VIDEO
Matt Jukes, Deputy Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police, and arrester/detainer of pro-Palestine journalists – new facial recognition software policing the protests and people being masked.
VIDEO
Patriot Platform – two protests this week. Their video narrated by a US lady, claiming they are Christian. Are Patriot Platform like Nazi SA street armies.
VIDEO
You could go to Victoria Station, but what would be the point in that, especially on a Saturday? Um, you could go down there like go visit MI5. There’s no point in going down there. Um, you could go across the bridge to Waterloo. You could go up here, Downing Street, Trafalga Square. If I was on a protest march and I’d finished shouting at the building, I would go up there. Downing Street, Trafalga Square. Iconic. The best place to go. The buildings are still totally empty, but it just feels better. And I think that’s the most important thing. But they didn’t do that. No. Where did they go? Yes, that’s right. They went [music] to Scotland yard. Guess I created a little bit of uh internet drama the other week, didn’t I? Because um I had a very simple question which is just, you know, why why on earth would the digital ID march be brought past um Scotland Yard? And it did create quite a lot of drama. But, you know, I I’d sort of decided to just to leave it, you know, just to leave it until yesterday, the 1st of November once the people had finished shouting at the Supreme Court, the march came up here, straight past Scotland Yard. There’s the camera that I was talking about the other day, by the way. I can’t see it. There we go. There it is. Um, why on earth did they come past here? Well, there was also a counterprotest against them. And where was the counterprotest held? It was held here at New Scotland Yard. And I was just like, dude, what on earth is going wrong? And why are all of these protests at New Scotland Yard? The police are the public and the public are the police. Pelian principal. Number seven, my favorite. So, you may remember that in my video I was questioning if they’re doing facial recognition with that camera, do they not have to um announce that they’re doing it, put up a sign or whatever? And I found out something extremely interesting. And I’ve cracked it. I’ve I’ve I’ve solved the Enigma code. Of course, I I I went to Charing Cross Police Station and I spoke to a young boy um who was impersonating a police officer and it said and he said, and I quote, “As far as I’m aware, our facial recognition is only done through the vans. I’m not aware of any facial recognition schemes that we do through buildings.” Well, he was wrong. Very wrong. So what they do with the vans is called LFR, live facial recognition where they are comparing faces against a known database of wanted people and supposedly if it’s not you, the machine just forgets about you. It forgot you ever saw you, you know, straight away, no problem.
VIDEO
We have already suspended over 30 arms licences used by the IDF in Gaza. That suspension remains fully in place. We will now also refuse all licence applications for arms and other exports that materially contribute to the occupation, in effect a double lock against arms sales. This means the ban on such exports will now remain as long as the occupation persists. To advance the two state solution, we also need viable and effective Palestinian governance. On the question of genocide, the UK has always supported full, robust and fair judicial processes to consider allegations, with final determinations made by competent courts before the British government reaches a conclusion. This has been the case for all of the genocides since the 1948 Genocide Convention: Rwanda, Srebrenica, Cambodia, and acts against the Yazidi people. This will remain our policy. It is right that this issue has been brought before the ICJ and I want to make it clear that we support the Court in coming to its determination. So accountability for what has happened in Gaza matters. But even more urgent is action to address the ongoing crisis. Because today in Gaza, the death and suffering continue. Nearly a year ago, Madame Deputy Speaker, a ceasefire was declared. Yet over 1,200 Palestinians have been killed since. And the people of Gaza are experiencing a totally avoidable humanitarian catastrophe, I am afraid, driven by decisions of the Israeli government. Last week I talked to courageous doctors and humanitarian aid workers who have served in Gaza. It was a heartbreaking conversation. They recounted: Children dying waiting for medical treatment. People forced to live next to open sewage and without shelter. And food insecurity rampant. I’m sure the whole House agrees, this is unconscionable. So I pledge we will continue to do everything we can to provide all the humanitarian support possible to help the people of Gaza. UK-supported hospitals in Gaza will enable around 800,000 medical consultations this year and essential health services for patients. UK expertise will deliver care to over a thousand child amputees. And we recently welcomed another wave of students from Gaza coming to study in Britain and we will welcome more. But in truth, unless Israel changes course, the situation will remain dire. So we are taking further steps – both ourselves and with others. Our extension of the global human rights sanctions regime will enable us to target those responsible for violations of international humanitarian law, whether in Gaza or anywhere else in the world. And we will at the UN General Assembly in New York later this month shine the clearest and harshest spotlight on what is happening and what must change. And with Jordan, we will convene countries across the world to lead a call for action on health and humanitarian access. We will also lend the UK’s voice to the growing global alliance of countries – led by Arab partners in the region – calling for the full implementation of the US-led 20 point plan, the rejection of extremism, and for a lasting end to the cycles of violence. As we implement the policy measures I have announced today, we will continue to assess the government of Israel by its actions. We want to see a new approach – in both Gaza and the West Bank. Madame Deputy Speaker, today we refuse to be bystanders to further suffering and to the destruction of the two state solution. We call out what is unlawful. We act on the import of goods from illegal settlements. We ban advertising of illegal settlements We act on services to prevent new settlement expansion. We act on settler violence. We support accountability for what has happened in Gaza. And we pledge to galvanise the international community to confront the ongoing and urgent humanitarian crisis. Above all, we say: Britain is not silent in the face of deep injustice and nor is it powerless.
The government says it will also target companies and individuals providing “construction, infrastructure, financing, or real estate” for settlement expansion. Foreign Secretary Ed Miliband warned those who “finance or facilitate illegal settlements” that they will face UK sanctions. That has potentially significant implications for a story I investigated last month for @MiddleEastEye .What will become Bristol’s tallest tower is currently rising in the city centre. Behind it is Israeli pension and insurance giant Menora Mivtachim, which backs Cain’s UK student-housing platform – a partnership whose portfolio was valued at more than £800m after its expansion into Bristol, with developments across Russell Group university cities. According to Who Profits, Menora Mivtachim have: (1) – Directly financed settlement construction, including 80 homes in Ariel and 84 homes in Ma’ale Adumim – the major West Bank settlement adjoining the crucial E1 area, whose expansion the UK is specifically seeking to deter. (2) – Financed a 1,642-home development in Katzrin in the occupied Syrian Golan, alongside tourism, roads and infrastructure. (3) – Holds a 74% stake in a solar project in the occupied West Bank, jointly owned with the Israeli settlement of Na’ama. (4) – Built significant shareholdings in companies involved in settlement construction, infrastructure and services. (5) – Holds significant stakes in companies providing security, fuel and other services to settlements across the occupied territories. All this sits alongside the fact that they have helped finance major Israeli military projects, including the IDF’s huge new intelligence campus in the Negev, intended to house Unit 8200, the signals-intelligence unit behind AI targeting tools used in Gaza. None of this means Menora will be sanctioned. The legislation and designation criteria are still to come. But yesterday’s announcement puts my investigation in a new light: Menora has documented financial links to the kinds of settlement construction, infrastructure, financing and commercial activity the UK government now says its new sanctions regime will target.
These decades-old condemnations are contained in UK Foreign Office files written during the administration of former Prime Minister Tony Blair while Israel undertook a brutal 2002 offensive in the occupied West Bank. The files, released in 2024 and reported in a recent investigation by the website Declassified UK, record British diplomats describing a pattern of abuses by a state their own government would go on to arm for the next two decades. Today, Blair sits on the Board of Peace that presides over Gaza, where Israel’s disregard for Palestinian lives and the rules of war has been demonstrated on a genocidal scale, while the UK’s newly seated leadership refer to Israel’s actions as “a stain on the conscience of the world”. But what did the British government already know about Israel’s actions more than 20 years ago? What the files say That record begins in March 2002, when then-Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon launched Operation Defensive Shield in retaliation for a wave of attacks by Palestinian armed groups, including Hamas. Israeli forces tore through the occupied West Bank, killing 500 Palestinians in a single month, mostly civilians, and injuring another 1,500. British officials were deeply aware of the scale of violations committed by Israeli forces. A Foreign Office official wrote at the time that Israeli military operations in the West Bank involved a “pattern” of “human rights abuses”. A senior British army officer was more blunt, calling the Israeli military a “second-rate, ill-disciplined, swaggering and bullying force”. “They routinely use excessive force such as firing at the ‘legs’ of stone throwers or at ‘car tyres’ with the inevitable stream of ambulances ferrying youths to hospital with fatal bullet wounds to the head and body,” wrote the officer who was unnamed in the files. Those concerns were put to the Israeli government directly. Lord Michael Levy, Blair’s special envoy, warned then-Defence Minister Binyamin Ben-Eliezer that there was no military solution, and that the campaign would only produce more suicide bombers. The Israeli violations described in the files have only multiplied, even becoming routine across occupied Palestinian territory. Officials also wrote of Red Cross staff threatened at gunpoint, and their ambulances not allowed to reach the wounded. Today, intimidation and targeting of medics has become standard operating procedure for Israeli forces and settlers. The World Health Organization has documented 3,254 Israeli attacks on healthcare across the occupied Palestinian territory over 20 years, killing or injuring more than 4,200 patients and medical staff. More than half of those attacks – and the deadliest of them – have come in the past three years.
VIDEO
Peter Oborne, DDN, on UK sanctions on Israel. Peter Oborne: Britain has FINALLY stood up to Israel PoliticsJOE Peter Oborne, journalist with Middle East Eye, joined Ava earlier in the week to discuss Ed Miliband’s plans to sanction illegal Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank. He tells us that Ed Miliband finally has Labour on the right side of public opinion. Peter Oborne’s book Complicit: Britain’s Role in the Destruction of Gaza is out with OR Books now. Chapters: 00:00 Why Oborne admires Miliband 00:59 Is Miliband standing up to Israel? 02:23 Britain takes action against settlements 03:41 Britain’s changing position on Israel 04:39 The West Bank and international law 06:10 Is Britain helping Israel? 07:34 Why Starmer couldn’t do this 08:26 Starmer the lawyer vs Starmer the politician 09:20 How Starmer got it wrong 09:49 The tragedy of Starmer’s majority 10:48 Has Labour been captured by Muslim voters? 11:56 Labour finally responds to public opinion
UAE President Mohammed bin Zayed spoke with Netanyahu 10 days before the attack and said Yahya Sinwar, the leader of Hamas in Gaza at the time, was planning an operation, the Haaretz daily said. Bin Zayed said it would lead to bloodshed and could destabilize the region and undermine the Abraham Accords, the normalization agreements between Israel and several Arab and Muslim-majority nations, the newspaper reported. But Netanyahu “reacted with relative calm,” according to Haaretz, which said he assured bin Zayed that Israel was prepared for any scenario and a possible attack was more likely to come from the occupied West Bank. Hamas militants killed some 1,200 people and took another 251 hostage in the Oct. 7 attack. Hundreds of Israelis, mostly soldiers, have been killed in continued fighting in wars in Gaza, Lebanon and Iran. Haaretz reported Netanyahu’s office called the report an “absolute lie” and said Netanyahu did not speak with the UAE president “during the period in question and received no warning from him.” His office denied Tuesday that the UAE gave him a warning. “If there was any relevant information, it was passed through intelligence channels between the two countries,” the statement said. The UAE’s Foreign Ministry also said that it would not comment on “speculation regarding conversations between government leaders.” Israel and the UAE have maintained “open and direct lines of communication” since they formally established ties five years ago, the statement said. It added: “When necessary, all relevant intelligence has been and continues to be communicated.” Israel is holding national elections next month and Netanyahu’s actions around the time of the Oct. 7 attack are a key issue in the campaign.
Azaria said he had felt threatened. The question of whether the soldier should face a military trial divided the country. To some Israelis, Azaria was no criminal but a soldier who had killed a terrorist. To others, Azaria had carried out an extrajudicial killing or even murder. He was eventually convicted of manslaughter by a military court. Eisenkot, then chief of staff of the Israel Defense Forces, defended the decision to prosecute Azaria, arguing that shooting an attacker who had already been incapacitated was incompatible with the values of the Israeli military. Netanyahu sided with the soldier and called for him to be pardoned. Elor Azaria sits with his parents and his girlfriend Orel at a military court. Israeli soldier Elor Azaria sits with his parents and his girlfriend Orel, left, as he awaits the verdict in his trial in Tel Aviv in January 2017. Azaria was convicted of manslaughter in a case that divided the country. A decade later, the dispute still reverberates. A former member of Netanyahu’s war cabinet, Eisenkot has seemingly overnight emerged as the prime minister’s most formidable challenger ahead of Israel’s parliamentary election on Oct. 27. His centrist Yashar! party — which he founded last year — was born out of rising discontent with Netanyahu’s response to the attack by Hamas on Israel on Oct. 7, 2023 and the war in Gaza that followed. In several nationwide polls,
To help clear up the confusion, here is a new edition of the most balanced and informed book on the topic, now updated with all the latest events, including pro- and anti-Trump theories, Edward Snowden’s mass-surveillance claims, post-truth issues, and much more. In this outstanding guide to conspiracies, researcher Andy Thomas looks at all the major theories, from the Roman Empire to the present day, exploring the social and psychological factors that have prompted them to spread. The accounts are stripped of unfounded opinion and presented factually, dramatically highlighting the core issues. Are we really under everyday mass-surveillance, as Edward Snowden claims? Is the rise of Donald Trump and global populism a genuine movement of the people or a manipulated social control experiment? Is there a secret governing elite ruling from the shadows, using fear and economic manipulation to create a network of global superstates? Could the attacks of 9/11 have been engineered by agencies within the USA itself? Andy Thomas invites you to read accounts and analyses of these and many other issues, to consider the facts and decide for yourself. … Reasoned, objective and most importantly fair…. a valuable addition to the existing canon of literature in this most fractious of fascinating, sometimes worrying and highly recommended.’ – Phenomena Magazine’Whether steeped in conspiracy lore or just a novice, you’ll get a better handle on what’s really going on in the world by reading Andy Thomas’s Conspiracies.’ – Nexus MagazineIn today’s environment, with trust in governments at an all-time low, conspiracy theories have found a new currency, and websites and social networking ensure they receive a wider and more rapid spread than ever before. But how do we separate truth from imagination? Was Princess Diana murdered, as many people think, despite all the official denials? Did NASA really go to the Moon, when anomalies in the photographic record suggest otherwise? Could 9/11 really have been set up by agencies within the USA itself? The author opens the conspiracy casebook by examining the mindset of those who believe in conspiracies, and considers whether the dismissive attitude towards them has been fair.Part Two looks into history to establish that when conspiracies do occur, credibility should therefore be given to belief in some of the alleged plots and cover-ups of today. This leads into a well-argued examination of some of the most popular conspiracies of our times, including theories over assassinations, UFO cover-ups, and widely voiced concerns over 9/11 and the ‘New World Order’.Part Three draws the conclusion that while not all conspiracy theories can be proven, they do at least draw attention to paths not to take, and can be valuable in helping to create a better world where new trust and hope can be forged. Are we living in a world of control, of oppression, of habitual deception? Is this really how things are, or simply human nature massively distorted through a dark lens? The truth probably lies somewhere in the middle. In today’s environment, with trust in governments at an all-time low, conspiracy theories have found a new currency, and websites and social networking ensure they receive a wider and more rapid spread than ever before. But how do we separate truth from imagination? Was Princess Diana murdered, as many people think, despite all the official denials? Did NASA really go to the Moon, when anomalies in the photographic record suggest otherwise? Could 9/11 really have been set up by agencies within the USA itself? The author opens the conspiracy casebook by examining the mindset of those who believe in conspiracies, and considers whether the dismissive attitude towards them has been fair.
Note that it does not imply that other groups (i.e. the US deep state and maybe others like the Saudi Arabian deep state) were not involved in both the commission and cover up of the September 11 attacks. The 9-11 event advanced the Neocon PNAC agenda, with its explicitly stated need for “…a catastrophic and catalysing event – like a new Pearl Harbor” [1] in order to mobilise US public opinion for already planned wars, the effects of which would be to destroy Israel’s enemies. Contents 1 Official narrative 2 Control of World Trade Center Complex 2.1 Four key Zionist Network assets 2.2 World Trade Center Security 2.2.1 Who Killed John O’Neil? 2.3 Airport Security 3 Prior Knowledge 3.1 Gomel Chesed Cemetery Incident 3.2 Israeli Citizens Get Tipped Off 3.3 ZIM forewarning 4 Mossad connections 4.1 U.S. Army Study: On Mossad 4.2 Israeli espionage around 9/11 4.3 After 9/11 – More detentions of Israelis 4.4 Five Dancing Israelis 4.5 “We are not your problem”? 4.6 Truck Bomb Destined for George Washington Bridge 4.7 Mural Van 4.8 Urban Moving Systems 4.9 Ptech Software systems – Computer control backdoor 4.10 MITRE corporation (computer software) 4.11 Precision guided plane? 4.12 Rabbi Dov Zakheim and Systems Planning Corporation 5 Cover Up 5.1 9/11 “Investigations” 5.2 Chief judges 5.3 Others 5.4 9/11 Commission 5.5 Crime Scene Evidence Quickly Removed and Destroyed 5.6 Cass Sunstein ‘s “Conspiracy Theories” 6 Other circumstances 6.1 Job holders on 9/11 6.2 Who was on board flight 11? 6.3 Bush Speech Writers Grossly Inflate Number of Israeli Casualties 6.3.1 Who was Bush’s Speechwriter? 6.4 Mohammed Atta Leads Us Directly To Jewish Crime Network Doorstep 6.5 Al Qaeda = Mossad Playing Dress Up 6.6 Netanyahu Openly Gleeful of 9/11 Terror Attacks 7 Connected Events 7.1 Zionist would-be terrorist incident at the Mexican Congress Building 7.2 2001 Anthrax attacks 8 Advocates 8.1 Hamid Gul 8.2 Victor Thorn 8.3 Francesco Cossiga 8.4 Kevin Barrett 8.5 Alan Sabrosky 8.6 Louis Farrakhan 8.7 Kees van der Pijl 9 US Deep state involvement 10 See Also 11 Related Quotations 12 Related Documents 13 References One of the first operational steps in preparation for the 9/11 attacks would have been to secure control of the World Trade Centre Complex itself. This is crucial because without complete control, the setting of explosives to bring down the towers would be next to impossible without serious risk of discovery. Four key Zionist Network assets Larry Silverstein, who made billions of dollars from the attacks Frank Lowy Ronald Lauder Lewis Eisenberg Larry Silverstein – is a Jewish American businessman from New York. Silverstein obtained a 99 year lease on the entire world trade center complex on 24 July, 2001. The towers were in fact close to worthless, being filled with asbestos,[8] yet Silverstein “felt a compelling urge to own them” and took out specific insurance against acts of “terrorism”. Silverstein had breakfast in “Windows on the World” restaurant (located in North Tower 107th Floor) every morning. [9] but broke this routine on the morning of 11 September 2001. Silverstein’s two children, who also worked in the WTC, were also absent from work that day. Larry Silverstein was paid $4.55 billion in insurance money as a result of the destruction of the WTC complex[10]. He also sued the airlines and airport security, seeking $12.3 billion in damages, though his ultimate payout after a 13 year legal battle was just $95.2 million.[11] Silverstein was a personal friend of media-magnate Rupert Murdoch and former Israeli prime minister Ariel Sharon. Haaretz reported that he was such good friends with Benjamin Netanyahu that he spoke with him on the phone every Sunday.[12]…
The Financial Times reported on Friday that it had been told by four sources that a flight plan submitted by a military aircraft triggered events that led to the outage. It claimed the entry caused a glitch within the wider air traffic control system that took hours to restart. The Ministry of Defence has denied making any errors amid reports that data entered by a military jet was behind the air traffic control system failure which threw UK airports into chaos. An MOD spokesperson said: “We do not believe there’s any indication of an error on the part of the military. “Because it’s subject to a live Nats investigation, which is expected to conclude next week, it would be inappropriate for us to comment any further while that investigation is ongoing.” A Nats spokesperson said: “We are continuing to investigate the underlying cause. “It would be wrong to speculate while that work continues, and a full technical investigation will follow.” The disruption has prompted calls for Martin Rolfe, chief executive of Nats, to resign. Mr Rolfe apologised for the incident, which he said he took “full responsibility” for. Michael O’Leary, the boss of budget airline Ryanair, called Mr Rolfe’s position “untenable” earlier this week. Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander told MPs on Wednesday afternoon that she did not believe the air traffic control issue was “unavoidable”. A Wizz Air spokesperson said the airline is “extremely disappointed” that a Nats technical failure caused the widespread disruption, adding: “Nats is simply not fit for purpose in its current form.” In August 2023, more than 700,000 passengers suffered disruption when flights were grounded at UK airports when Nats suffered a technical glitch while processing a flight plan.
Part Two – International news review, Accelerationist, Armageddonist reports and investigations
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XkHGD-Ac4r8
The anomalies in the official ‘suicide’ story of David Kelly, as studied by David Halpin [VIDEO] . We are sad to hear of the passing of David Halpin. He was stalwart supporter of the Palestinian people. The things he witnessed in Gaza when he worked there as a trauma surgeon stayed with him throughout his life. He started the original ‘Gaza flotilla’ attempting to sail 2 boats with medical supplies and food in them to Gaza over 20 years ago. He truly was a remarkable person To the Attorney-General of the UK The Rt.Hon Richard Hermer KC re: the absence of a proper inquest into the death of David Kelly CMG DSc in July 2003 Dear Lord Hermer First, I would like to offer my congratulations on your recent appointment to the post of Attorney-General. I write to you in this regard. On 17 February 2009 you invited me, together with some other doctors, to visit you at Doughty Street chambers to discuss the death of Dr David Kelly. We set out our concerns about the manner in which the state had dealt with this tragedy and explained to you our doubts that it was investigated rigorously. As you know, the coroner’s inquest into Dr Kelly’s death was – uniquely – subsumed into the ad hoc inquiry chaired by Lord Hutton, who concluded that Dr Kelly took his own life in July 2003. This is the only time in British legal history that a coroner’s inquest into a single death has been adjourned using Section 17A of the 1988 Coroners Act so that a non-statutory public inquiry could be held instead. The lawful process of the opening of a coroner’s inquest did not happen. The cart was put before a well tried and respected horse. Careful analysis over many years by the group of doctors of which I was a member – plus the work of various lawyers, parliamentarians and investigative journalists – has found how woefully inadequate Lord Hutton’s non-statutory public inquiry was. To name just a handful of its deficiencies: Lord Hutton failed to call key witnesses to give evidence to his inquiry; yet those witnesses who were called were not required to give evidence on oath. We now know that there were no fingerprints on the knife Kelly allegedly used to end his life – even though he wasn’t wearing gloves on the day his body was found. (This was never mentioned at the Hutton Inquiry even though it was known to Thames Valley Police at the time the Hutton Inquiry hearings took place). Lord Hutton spent only half a day of the 24 days on which his inquiry sat examining the medical evidence relating to Dr Kelly’s death. And Lord Hutton failed to consider the crucial matter – incumbent upon every coroner – of whether Dr Kelly intended to commit suicide. I must stress that the above list is not exhaustive. It is designed to underscore the point that, legally speaking, Lord Hutton’s ad hoc inquiry was less independent and less thorough than a coroner’s inquest would have been, with disastrous results. The high bar that a coroner would have had to clear in order to reach a suicide finding in the matter of Dr Kelly’s death was simply absent from the Hutton Inquiry. When we met you at your chambers in 2009, we were being helped pro bono by Leigh Day & Co. Knowing you to be a man of truth and integrity, Frances Swaine, of that firm, advised us to consult you. Your sympathetic view was that we should focus on the first cause of death advanced by Lord Hutton – “haemorrhage from a cut left ulnar artery” – as originally written by a Home Office pathologist, Dr Nicholas Hunt, and also to judicially review the then Attorney General, Baroness Scotland, rather than JR her refusal to instigate an inquest. You may know that with wide public support a hearing was eventually held at the High Court in December 2011 – Halpin v Regina. In total, about five hours were spent in plea and defence. At the hearing’s conclusion, Mr Justice Nicol read out from 19 pages of text and determined that the Attorney General of the day – Dominic Grieve – had been right to refuse an inquest into Dr Kelly’s death in 2011. And there, the matter of Dr Kelly’s unnatural death has most unsatisfactorily remained, for Mr Grieve’s decision was no more than a distant echo of Lord Hutton’s original finding. I am aware that Britain’s legal system is facing many crises, especially in the criminal and family justice courts and in terms of prison capacity. Yet public trust in our country’s law enforcement, and what follows in the courts, has withered. Specifically, many British citizens – including some Appeal Court judges – do not believe that Dr Kelly’s death was adequately investigated at Lord Hutton’s inquiry. This has left a cloud of suspicion hanging over this troubling and vital matter. For this reason I am calling upon you to kindly consider allowing a full coroner’s inquest into Dr Kelly’s death to be held in order to resolve this situation for once and for all. My understanding is that you alone as Attorney-General, has the power to do this. I revere ‘the law’ and quote from your speech of yesterday in the Royal Courts of Justice. “Being in government is a privilege that carries the responsibility of having to make hard choices but as we face the challenging path ahead the rule of law will be the lodestar for this government.” * Yours sincerely, David Halpin MB BS FRCS Dartmoor
Trump to give everyone $5,000 if they vote for him!? US President Donald Trump has offered every adult American $5,000 (£3,700) if Republicans win November’s midterm elections, but it is unclear how such a plan would be funded and whether it is legal. His remarks prompted raucous applause from supporters at a party convention on Wednesday night, although Democrats labelled it an “empty promise”. Trump also told the Republican conference that the money would have to be spent in the US, but it is unclear how that would be monitored. US Vice-President JD Vance suggested it might be paid for by tariff revenue and that such cheques would not go to wealthy Americans.
VIDEO
Drawing on his experience as former UK Ambassador to Uzbekistan and his recent time on the ground in Lebanon, Murray argues that Western elites misread Iran by listening to exiles and Gulf clients, and underestimated Iranian national cohesion after the recent 12-day war and the history of the 1953 Mossad/CIA intervention. Murray contends that Donald Trump’s response — including threats of sweeping sanctions on anyone trading with Iran — reflects a mercantilist worldview focused on physical control of trade, ports and shipping rather than free trade. In Murray’s analysis, closing the Strait of Hormuz hurts Asian economies that depend on Gulf oil while doing little direct damage to the US, which he presents as part of a deliberate strategy to damage China, India and other competitors. He further alleges — as his own estimate, not a verified fact — that market volatility around negotiations has been exploited for personal financial gain through oil futures, citing trades placed in the half-hour before announcements. These are the guest’s allegations and interpretations. The conversation also examines Iran’s resistance economy after decades of sanctions, why Murray believes Iran can build a resilient, sanctions-proof industrial base for its 90-million-person market with access to Pakistan and neighboring states, the role of Dubai as an alleged sanctions-busting entrepot, parallels with Venezuela’s domestic pharmaceutical production, and why predictions that Saudi desert pipelines will strip Iran of leverage ignore — in Murray’s view — Yemeni resistance in the Bab el-Mandeb and potential Iran-China pipeline corridors via Afghanistan. The discussion closes on what a one-state solution framed to 1946 borders means for Palestine’s endgame. In This Episode: • Why Murray says Iran is a civilization, not a militia — and why it wasn’t defeated like Syria or Venezuela • Strait of Hormuz closure: leverage, global oil prices, and who it really hurts • Mercantilism vs. free trade: Trump’s tariff and port-control worldview • Is China already the world’s economic — and military — superpower? • Dubai as sanctions busting hub: would enforcing sanctions collapse its economy? • Iran’s sanctions-proof economy: minerals, talent, and a 90M market • Pipeline politics: Saudi desert pipelines, Yemen, and the China-Iran corridor 00:00 — Introduction: Craig Murray — From Ambassador to Rights Warrior 02:15 — Gaza, Lebanon, Yemen: Two Years Watching Genocide Up Close 05:40 — Has Iran Been Defeated? A Civilization vs. Empire 09:30 — The 12-Day War: Mossad, Insurgency and Why Regime Change Failed 15:20 — Strait of Hormuz Closed: Trump’s Mercantilist Gamble 22:10 — Hurting China: Why Closure Is Seen as a Feature, Not a Bug 28:45 — Venezuela Parallel: Seizing Oil and Blocking China 33:00 — Dubai: The Worst-Kept Secret of Sanctions Busting 38:20 — Resistance Economies: How Iran and Venezuela Build Self-Sufficiency 44:00 — Pipelines, Yemen and the Guardian Claim About Saudi Leverage Craig Murray is a former British Ambassador to Uzbekistan, author, and human rights campaigner. He has reported extensively from Lebanon and is a frequent commentator on UK foreign policy, the Middle East, and civil liberties. Views expressed are his own.
The bombshell allegations could potentially spark fears the operation is an elaborate FSB stunt aimed at engendering suspicion between Britain and Ukraine, to disrupt a key axis of Kyiv’s defence. Moscow regularly disapprovingly depicts the UK as Ukraine’s staunchest Western ally. A spokesperson for the UK’s Foreign, Commonwealth and Security Office (FCDO) said: “We don’t comment on security matters. It is common that Russian state actors seek to drive wedges between Ukraine and its international partners through disinformation.” Footage shows the alleged 45-year old “spy” – a Russian citizen evidently employed as a security officer at the British Ambassador’s official Residence – as he was violently overpowered by masked and armed plain-clothed FSB officers in Moscow, and thrown facedown on the ground. The video purports to show a confession by the alleged SBU security service in Kyiv. The alleged agent is accused by Russia of supplying a security and military linked Ukrainian blogger Dmytro ‘Apostle’ Karpenko with secret details about diplomats and their movements. The purported “confession” shows the unnamed detainee claiming “the Ukrainian authorities were very interested in the information for the purpose of carrying out acts of sabotage against the British Ambassador, the Embassy, and the British Residence in Moscow”. Article continues below ADVERTISEMENT The detainee is shown on the FSB video saying: “I was a member of the security staff at the British Embassy in Moscow. Article continues below ADVERTISEMENT “Specifically, I handled security duties at the British Ambassador’s Residence in Moscow.” This is one of Moscow’s most prominent diplomatic buildings directly across Moscow River from the Kremlin. “In January of this year, I contacted Dmitry Karpenko, a Ukrainian blogger and journalist – specifically, a pro-Ukrainian blogger,” the ‘suspect’ alleged. “I told him I worked at the British Embassy in Moscow. “He was very interested in this information – specifically, details about the Ambassador [Nigel Casey], his deputies, other diplomats, and the staff of both the Embassy and the Residence. He wanted their personal details, addresses, and full names. “Information on the vehicles they drove, their movements, the restaurants they visited, and the cities they traveled to; and the arrival and departure times of all staff and diplomats. “He was also extremely interested in the security arrangements – how security and protection were handled at the British Embassy and Residence in Moscow. “This included the access control system, events held on the Residence grounds, and the number of security personnel on duty. “In short, he wanted all information regarding the security of the British Residence and Embassy in Moscow. In the alleged confession, he continued: “When I asked why he needed this, he replied that the Ukrainian authorities were very interested in the information for the purpose of carrying out acts of sabotage against the British Ambassador, the Embassy, and the British Residence in Moscow.” So far, the FSB has offered no direct proof of potentially deadly attacks targeting Britain’s ambassador and other diplomats. The suspect has been charged with high treason under Article 275, which can carry life imprisonment. It is understood he was employed by an outside organisation providing security to the embassy and not by the British government directly Russian state news agency TASS claimed: “The Kyiv regime, in order to preserve itself, is ready to resort to sabotage and terrorist acts against its strategic allies.” The FSB urged Russian citizens to refrain from any contact with pro-Ukrainian bloggers. When he arrived in Moscow in 2023, Casey, 57, made a video appeal from his Residence, with the Kremlin visible, calling for the “ending the human suffering caused by Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rKggTxdaIYA
Eight years have passed since the terror atrocities of September 11, 2001, heinous false-flag terror crimes which took the lives of thousands of innocent people and led to drastic changes in the United States and around the world [VIDEO] . Although the terror attacks have yet to be properly investigated and prosecuted by the federal government, we now have scientific evidence that proves that the official explanation is nothing but a pack of lies, a massive deception foisted on the public by corrupt government officials and the controlled media.Most significantly, this deception was promoted by officials and media owners who knew it to be false. The U.S. Department of Justice, for example, oversaw the destruction of many tons of structural steel – crucial evidence from the crime scenes. On one hand, the government and media have intentionally pushed a fabrication that a band of Islamic terrorists hijacked airplanes and flew them into the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, causing the complete destruction and pulverization of two 110-story towers and a 47- story building in lower Manhattan. Using this deception, the federal government and its agents have created a police state in the United States and forced Americans and other Western nations to participate in an utterly fraudulent “War on Terror,” waging illegal wars of aggression and occupation in the Middle East, Central Asia, and Africa. Untold thousands have died in these illegal wars of aggression. On the other hand, we have scientific evidence that the Twin Towers were blown up with an advanced form of super-thermite, chips of which were found in five different samples of the dust from the demolished towers by Dr. Steven E. Jones of Brigham Young University. This crucial Bollyn.com discovery, published as a peer-reviewed paper in March 2009 with other scientists, completely disproves the official version that the Twin Towers fell as a result of fires caused by the plane crashes. This discovery also explains the explosive destruction and pulverization of the immense steel-frame and concrete buildings. As Professor Jones says, “The data doesn’t lie.” Rather than addressing the evidence that the World Trade Center was demolished with explosives, however, the new administration of President Barack Obama continues to use the 9- 11 deception to increase the war effort in Afghanistan, occupying a nation that had nothing to do with the terror attacks in the United States. Neither Osama Bin Laden nor the Taliban had anything to do with the demolition of the World Trade Center, which the evidence proves was carried out using an advanced form of Thermite created using nano-technology. Nor did the airplane crashes themselves cause the towers to collapse. The plane crashes were merely part of the deception, meant to provide a plausible explanation for the pre-planned explosive demolitions that followed. This is why 2009 is such a crucial year for 9-11 truth. A modern republic like the United States cannot continue for very long as a free nation with a government and media that lie to the people about the murder of thousands of its citizens and illegal wars supposedly waged on their behalf. This is clearly a state in the process of a revolutionary change. The American people will not tolerate a police state using such outrageous lies to rob them of their money and freedom. “We are not afraid to entrust the American people with unpleasant facts,” President John F. Kennedy said in 1962. “For a nation that is afraid to let its people judge the truth and falsehood in an open market is a nation that is afraid of its people.” So, who is really afraid of unpleasant facts and the truth of 9-11? It is not the people, but the culprits of the terror atrocity and the subsequent cover-up who fear the truth. My work provides some of the unpleasant but essential facts about 9-11. It represents eight years of work and is dedicated to the truth and the people who died on that day. It is unacceptable that their deaths, and the suffering of their families, have been exploited to deceive the world and wage illegal wars. Christopher Bollyn Labor Day, 2009
VIDEO
And what everybody was in agreement all of the vested interests was you needed uh an governments to play an added role in the economy to provide basic needs at subsidized prices and uh it was the America’s first economics professor at the first business school the Wharton school u that uh said Simon Patton said that Public infrastructure is a fourth factor of production besides labor, capital, and land, which really isn’t a factor of production, but uh rent extraction. Uh and but public infrastructure doesn’t aim at making a profit. It aims at minimizing the price of basic needs so that uh labor can doesn’t have to u cover these costs and employers can uh won’t have to pay for these costs because public investment is more productive and less highpriced than private investment because uh the aim of public uh infrastructure canals, railroads u public uh is not to make a profit, it’s to make the economy profitable. Well, it was the conservative prime minister Benjamin Draeli in Britain that said health, public health, that’s the center of things. And it was Draeli that promoted public health as opposed to the the United States under President Obama that says we’ve got to privatize public health. and uh the American medical associations as ever since the 1950s fighting we’re against socialized medicine. Well, uh it ends up that uh that uh instead of socialized medicine taking over the medical practice of doctors, the private health insurance companies have taken over what doctors can do uh here and pressed uh the uh cost of medical uh care to 20% of GDP. Well, this is far in excess of what other countries from Europe to uh China do. China offers public health and also free public education as England uh did for a long time and as many European countries did. But now it’s very expensive everywhere from uh over 50,000 a year at least in the United States to high prices for English uh Australian and other Western uh English-speaking universities and I guess in uh uh German universities. All of these functions that were supposed to create a competitive lowpriced economy are uh now being privatized, high-priced and uh countries such as China and Russia are uh keeping the price of basic needs low and they’re doing what is supposedly what democracies are supposed to do. The Americans say we’re democracy against autocracy. But that’s not what this fight is all about. It’s against Western oligarchy versus uh socialism uh state uh in in industrial capitalism with a strong public uh subsidy. uh and uh this subsidy prevents an uh a financial oligarchy from developing because what China has done and going further than the socialist movements have advocated in uh in the west is to say money is a public utility and we’re creating money and credit to the people’s bank of China to uh not to uh finance corporate takeovers and making money uh financially by financial engineering We’re using money and credit to finance actual construction. Well, they’ve over financed housing construction obviously, but they’ve also financed their industry. They financed their wind farms. Uh they’re financing their uh basic uh research or at least providing uh government uh subsidy and support for private enterprise. Uh doing all of these there’s a mixed economy. Every successful civilization in history has been a mixed economy.
Tony’s paperback Traitors Of Arnhem , Siege Of Heaven ; Siege Of Heaven Reader – all available for donation, or to buy, via www.bilderberg.org The Bristol Politics Show CANCELLED and attempts to intimidate us
July 2024 – Tony, Dave and Martin’s NOT The BCfm Politics show was CANCELLED/EVICTED from their PRSC studio in a no fault, no notice, no appeal, eviction by Chloe Slater of The People’s Republic of Stokes Croft (PRSC) arts centre – An email from Chloe and Keith Cowling explained that: ‘Transphobic’ leaflets, which we were not shown, had been left in the building by a recent guest (who denied it) making Transsexual users of the building feel ‘offended’ and ‘unsafe’. To quote: ‘Please let us know when you or Dave would like to come and retrieve your equipment and drop off your keys. Kind regards’ PRSC Directors (Keith Cowling, chair) PRSC / Stokes Croft China 17-35 Jamaica St Bristol BS2 8JP. Chloe Slater (formerly young man Jez and now self-defined as ‘she’) also made it difficult for us to retrieve the last of our equipment by inferring we couldn’t be trusted, we were made to wait in the cold outside their building for over 30 minutes to return their mixing desk and retrieve our remaining kit in December 2024. March 2020 – BCfm’s weekly Politics Show presented by Tony Gosling with Irish Republican Labour activist Martin Summers was forced off FM, now online only by station manager Pat Hart. He decided the show should be ‘rested, due to the pandemic’ on 24 March 2020 and then refused to communicate at all when we requested to do the show remotely. Bristol Community FM (BCfm) charity ‘CEO’ Patrick Hart is a long-time personal friend of Bristol’s all-powerful right-wing ‘Labour’ mayor Marvin Rees. Pat Hart has a private property portfolio on the continent and also does Public Relations work for property speculators who are taking over community facilities such as Redfield Cinema . Now on Internet only NOT The BCfm Politics Show is available 17:00-c. 20:00 live on Fridays. Pat Hart replaced us with a dumbed-down student show repeating MSM stories called The Bristol Agenda . If you’d like to share your views on his deliberate dumbing-down and pro-Covid jab mismanagement you can contact UK broadcasting regulator Ofcom or BCfm board chair and the ‘Don’ himself, here .
i-Contact Video Network to distribute documentaries on VHS video and DVD and to make their own documentaries as well as attend news events and sell video footage to TV news channels. Amongst the films we distributed were Operation Solstice, Coconut Revolution, Mark Purdey and Organophosphates, McLibel, 9/11 In Plane Site, Ludicrous Diversion and The Battle of Trafalgar. These, plus books, and even a board game about drug dealing ‘Dollars and Dibble’, were all available via mail order and we supplied libraries around the world too. The bank had clearly been ordered to investigate us for money laundering, although they never admitted it. All the questions they asked Ben and I were about proving our identity through passports etc.. When we did, yet more letters kept arriving demanding more proofs, birth certificates etc. and eventually when one of us missed supplying the required information, within a week or so of being asked, the account was summarily closed and we got a cheque made out to one of us with the few hundred pounds that was in the business bank account. Since neither of us could get a business bank account up and running for at least a few months and the bank account meant nobody could any longer use the website, we made the reluctant decision to shut it down. Thus was a thriving business killed off by the Co_operative bank. Having said that, co-op were not quite the worst. We did apply to open an account at Bristol’s ‘ethical’ Triodos bank, who proceeded to string us along for several months and then said our business was too risky for them to provide an account!
(from c. 11pm) This week’s full interview mp3s, bottom of page. SHOW STARTS 17:00 London time FOR c. 4 HRS TO c. 20:50 – OUR LIVE STREAM to Listen live online. Alt. live stream, DJ Plug Radio OR Download Show After Transmission HERE. Repeats 11 & 5 AM & PM daily on our stream
July 2024 – Tony, Dave and Martin’s NOT The BCfm Politics show was CANCELLED/EVICTED from their PRSC studio in a no fault, no notice, no appeal, eviction by Chloe Slater of The People’s Republic of Stokes Croft (PRSC) arts centre – An email from Chloe and Keith Cowling explained that: ‘Transphobic’ leaflets, which we were not shown, had been left in the building by a recent guest (who denied it) making Transsexual users of the building feel ‘offended’ and ‘unsafe’. To quote: ‘Please let us know when you or Dave would like to come and retrieve your equipment and drop off your keys. Kind regards’ PRSC Directors (Keith Cowling, chair) PRSC / Stokes Croft China 17-35 Jamaica St Bristol BS2 8JP. Chloe Slater (formerly young man Jez and now self-defined as ‘she’) also made it difficult for us to retrieve the last of our equipment by inferring we couldn’t be trusted, we were made to wait in the cold outside their building for over 30 minutes to return their mixing desk and retrieve our remaining kit in December 2024. 
[UPDATE channel restored by YT in July 2025] October 2022 – Tony’s Public Enquiry Channel opened in March 2008, with 13 million views, over 1,600 videos and 26,000 subscribers is removed under false pretences by YouTube – A video Tony recorded in New Zealand ‘Bill Gates, ID2020 & Revelation: Quaker Tony Gosling on Covid 19 & the Bible’ and uploaded on 8th April 2020 got a ‘third strike’ but YouTube’s ‘medical misinformation’ regime was introduced in September 2021 so should not have included as ‘strikes’ videos uploaded before that date. Documentary makers are just about the only public interest investigators left in the NATO zone. From the top down, our mainstream media, police, political parties & intelligence services are being compromised by feudal banksters, secret societies and the mafia. Key people intimidated by psychopathic black magic types and their pliable drones who will even kill to take over positions of power? Just search for “John Scarlett” and “Dodgy Dossier” and you’ll see what I mean. The Zionists are every bit as fundamentalist and twisted as the leaders and followers of ISIS. Register here and join us in the discussion as we wriggle free of the psychopaths, back to sanity http://www.911forum.org.uk
March 2020 – BCfm’s weekly Politics Show presented by Tony Gosling with Irish Republican Labour activist Martin Summers was forced off FM, now online only by station manager Pat Hart. He decided the show should be ‘rested, due to the pandemic’ on 24 March 2020 and then refused to communicate at all when we requested to do the show remotely. Bristol Community FM (BCfm) charity ‘CEO’ Patrick Hart is a long-time personal friend of Bristol’s all-powerful right-wing ‘Labour’ mayor Marvin Rees. Pat Hart has a private property portfolio on the continent and also does Public Relations work for property speculators who are taking over community facilities such as Redfield Cinema. Now on Internet only NOT The BCfm Politics Show is available 17:00-c. 20:00 live on Fridays. Pat Hart replaced us with a dumbed-down student show repeating MSM stories called The Bristol Agenda. If you’d like to share your views on his deliberate dumbing-down and pro-Covid jab mismanagement you can contact UK broadcasting regulator Ofcom or BCfm board chair and the ‘Don’ himself, here.
February 2019 – Ofcom complaint result: UKLFI exposed as creation of Israeli foreign ministry – Bristol Post article: BCfm cleared after being reported to Ofcom for anti-semitic conspiracy theories – It could have resulted in BCfm radio station being shut down if the complaint was upheld Tony Gosling reported to Ofcom by UK Lawyers for Israel after being accused of anti-semitism A Bristol radio station, which had one of its programmes reported for anti-semitism and racism has been cleared by Ofcom. The radio regulatory body received a complaint from “UK Lawyers for Israel’ over a show on BCfm radio, hosted by investigative journalist Tony Gosling. The weekly politics show, on the popular community radio station based in Easton, was reported for several allegations on a show which aired on November 23. Tony Gosling, who was a former BBC journalist between 1989 and 1993, has been producing and presenting ‘The Tony Gosling Politics’ show every week on BCFM radio for 11 years. They have released a statement which reads: “Whilst we are supportive of all our volunteer presenters, The Tony Gosling Politics Show only represents approximately ten percent of our political output content wise, and less than two per cent of our entire weekly output.” Mr Gosling’s programme looks at local politics and he interviews a range of councillors and MPs in the city. The show is also perhaps more well known for its alternative look at international politics, and he has a cult following online from across the world. Mr Gosling has made regular appearances on national media including the politics show with Andrew Neil on BBC One, and international channels such as Russia Today, Channel1 Russia, NTV, and recently for both Turkish and Lebanon TV.
November 2012 – Tony gets death threats on the phone from the Jewish Defence League – ‘you’re a dead man walking’ – a man calls him and Tony records the call. Audio of UK Jewish Defence League (JDL) death threat against British journalist Tony Gosling (2012) – Avon and Somerset police Special Branch investigate, trace the caller, and after six months report to Tony that the individual has been served a caution that they will proceed with a prosecution for harassment under the 1861 offences against the person act. Seems pretty clear this death threat was issued alongside the lies, copied below, which were published on their blog by London based UK JDL in November 2012. Firstly Tony Gosling is not a ‘homophobe’. That accusation was first made in an article published by the ‘Harry’s Place’ blog, penned by Zionist David Toube and propelled by him anonymously into Private Eye in 2008. It refers to Gosling’s criticism of senior teachers at Bannerman Road Primary school in Bristol who used homosexual early learning picture books against the express wishes of the parent governors. His criticism was about the deception by teaching staff not because of the homosexual content of the books. Secondly, if you follow the JDL link you’ll find what Tony Gosling actually says about the ‘Protocols Of The Learned Elders Of Zion’ says “…I don’t think there is much doubt that the Protocols are fake…” Thirdly he is not a member of Bristol Palestine Solidarity Campaign and has never been to any of their meetings.
Autumn 2014 – Tony’s documentary production and distribution business shut down by its bank. Our thriving Co-op business bank account ordered closed for undisclosed reasons. Tony Gosling and Ben Edwards founded i-Contact Video Network to distribute documentaries on VHS video and DVD and to make their own documentaries as well as attend news events and sell video footage to TV news channels. Amongst the films we distributed were Operation Solstice, Coconut Revolution, Mark Purdey and Organophosphates, McLibel, 9/11 In Plane Site, Ludicrous Diversion and The Battle of Trafalgar. These, plus books, and even a board game about drug dealing ‘Dollars and Dibble’, were all available via mail order and we supplied libraries around the world too. The bank had clearly been ordered to investigate us for money laundering, although they never admitted it. All the questions they asked Ben and I were about proving our identity through passports etc.. When we did, yet more letters kept arriving demanding more proofs, birth certificates etc. and eventually when one of us missed supplying the required information, within a week or so of being asked, the account was summarily closed and we got a cheque made out to one of us with the few hundred pounds that was in the business bank account. Since neither of us could get a business bank account up and running for at least a few months and the bank account meant nobody could any longer use the website, we made the reluctant decision to shut it down. Thus was a thriving business killed off by the Co_operative bank. Having said that, co-op were not quite the worst. We did apply to open an account at Bristol’s ‘ethical’ Triodos bank, who proceeded to string us along for several months and then said our business was too risky for them to provide an account! 
25th Anniversary of 9/11. Ian Henshall, author of ‘9/11: The New Evidence’, joins Tony and Martin online. He explains the anomalies of the official story of 9/11. The original 9/11 Revealed attracted lavish praise from reviewers in the Daily Mail and Sunday Times for the ‘huge gaps’ it exposed in the official 9/11 story. It became a non-fiction bestseller despite a wall of silence by the broadcast media and condemnation in a special web page set up by the US State Department. 
