MP3 of Friday 25th September 2026 show [right click to download] (from c. 11pm) This week’s full interview mp3s, bottom of page. SHOW STARTS 17:00 London time FOR c. 4 HRS TO c. 20:50 – OUR LIVE STREAM to Listen live online. Alt. live stream, DJ Plug Radio OR Download Show After Transmission HERE. Repeats 11 & 5 AM & PM daily on our stream
Download NOT THE BCFM POLITICS SHOW APP [ANDROID APP (1)] and [APKPURE (2)] – or the [Apple App store] – PS. You can replace evil Google Play, which effectively banned us, with [the Aurora store]
All time low: 31% trust the UK Press – UK media oligopoly TONY’S BOOKS: Bilderberg.org – 2 PAPER–BACKS – TONY’S CHANNELS: Telegram – Bitchute – 911 forum – Radio4All – The Land Is Ours – VK – Twitter/X – Farcebook – Brighteon – Rumble – RT Live on Rumble –  Goebbelsesque YouTube: This show; Public Enquiry; Peter Borenius; i-Contact & Occult Geopolitics

Radio4All mp3 audio files usually available from 23:00 2-4hrs, after TX – we’ll credit you if you rebroadcast. Any probs. mp3s should be on alternative links below by then

Part One – Local and National News Review

Election in Holborn and St Pancras. Neil McAvoy on how being a Welsh politician led to death threats and potential sabotage of his car. I was born in Cardiff West, I grew up on the Fairwater estate in Cardiff West, I went to school in Cardiff West, I live in Cardiff West and I’m raising my family in Cardiff West. “They’re all the same”, is the most common response on the doorstep, and this is true. But in this election, you have a choice in Cardiff West. A choice to vote for a candidate with a proud record of over 25 years in public service of our communities, an experienced, independent-minded representative who is not afraid to say it like it is, who will challenge injustice, speak out against corruption, and represent our community with every fibre of my being. This is why Propel was born, to challenge the status quo of the establishment uni-parties. To offer a real political alternative. As we know, there is no strong opposition to the main political parties. We must be that opposition. My record of public service is one that I am proud of, as one of Cardiff Council’s longest-serving councillors, first elected in 1999. With me, you see a record of doing things differently, in word and deed. I was responsible for freezing councillors’ pay 2008 – 11 and only accepted half the Deputy Leader’s allowance. I also donated my councillor allowance 2016-21 when in the Senedd. How many other politicians have done that? We restructured Cardiff Council back then, supporting front-line services by cutting salaries of over 100 thousand pounds a year. I have a record of challenging injustice, and not taking the easy road. Standing up, not for what’s easiest, but for what’s right. Not afraid to stand by myself when it could be easier to be part of the crowd. That’s what Propel represents, doing what’s right even though it might not be easy. I won’t give up: it is a principle that grounds me and drives my personal and political beliefs. Now, of all times, we cannot give up. There is too much at stake. Amidst the noise and wrangling for power between the two dominant uni parties, we can’t forget about the need for a local voice for our community. My contract with you, Cardiff West: – Be a strong advocate for protecting our freedoms and civil liberties: every country in the UK should have a constitution. – Direct democracy: our community’s right to have its say on what goes on here; it happens in Switzerland, why not here: reinstate the local – Support a publicly owned housing company to build truly affordable housing to enable the young to buy a home – Support women’s sex-based rights and protect children from dangerous gender ideology. – Be a voice for the vaccine injured who are ignored and without compensation I can proudly say that I am the only elected member who has consistently and fiercely campaigned against the environmental destruction of Cardiff West. The LDP is the biggest single issue that has faced our communities over the last 15 years. Remember when they called me a liar and a scaremonger when I said Labour was going to build on our green fields? I led the campaign against nuclear mud being dredged from outside a Somerset nuclear reactor, to be dumped in Cardiff waters, against the Welsh national interest. Incredibly, mud laced with plutonium was dumped on our coast; it is more incredible that so few people know about Labour in Wales voting for it to happen in 2018. I fought the draconian Coronavirus laws of Labour supported by all other parties, against the harms of damaging lockdowns, particularly for our vulnerable, elderly, and young people. Sadly, we now know that I was right when I said lockdowns would kill more people than Covid. In me, you have someone who will always stand for our communities against the power, greed, and money of big corporations.

4TH REICH FINANCE FASCISM UK 1, IN THE NEWS MEDIA: THE CANARY Kerry-Anne Mendoza, former editor of The Canary, interviewed by Crispin Flintoff, on the hostile takeover. Bristol 24/7 and Bristol Post had similar take overs. Integrity Initiative. WTF happened with The Canary? The Crispin Flintoff Show The Canary has reported that it has been debanked again. But there are also claims of mismanagement. What has been going on? I left the Canary in 2021 because of my health. Um I was dealing with stuff at the time, trauma, various other bits and bobs and I just couldn’t couldn’t perform my role properly. So I I gave way um and a year later Steve mounted a coup that was vicious um in its in its nature to to take control of of the canary. Um I received legal threats on my on my birthday the following year. This is having left off my own valition. By the way, I under my leadership, we never took a penny of investment from any company ever for precisely the reasons that you wonderful gentlemen have raised, which is that it doesn’t matter what the intentions are of the person given the money. Even if their whole track record is wonderful, if it was, you know, Vivian Westwood in her day or someone like that, I still wouldn’t have taken the money because I know implicit in that is a responsibility. it is going to give pressure to me. You know, if I then recruit more people and that person for whatever reason wants to use that leverage to stop me publishing something, I’m going to have a conflict where I wouldn’t otherwise have a conflict, which is why I never ever went down that route because you don’t want to create the conflict in the first place. Um, and the only way to do that is to is to plow the harder road, which is to solicit donations and support from as many small individuals as possible so there’s no um enormous shareholder in your business that can that can threaten you. Um, and so after going through all of that and then launching this whole workers co-op, rewriting the history of the Canary as these terrible years they suffered and then they’ve got this glorious workers co-op. And then to see that Steve had taken 2 million from a private donor, scratched all records of this co-op. It was all just forgotten about as Ben will know. Suddenly it’s not a co-op. Suddenly it’s a limited business with Steve as the CEO. Um I was honestly staggered. I I was like that is an about face that um I think even Nigel Farage would struggle to pull off um to to be honest. And um yeah, so I’m deeply deeply suspicious of what’s going on there because I I I never understood and you know I think of myself as a pretty good judge of character and these you know this is a situation I’ve been in for years. I have personal relationships here. um and could not find any logical reason to why that original coup had been mounted, why it had been so vicious um with no effort to to reach out personally and have any engagement. You know, I I never said a word publicly at the time except to say this is nonsense, but I’m not I don’t have any way of, you know, fighting this….

4TH REICH FINANCE FASCISM UK 2, IN POLITICS: REFORM UK ZAHAWI/PINAY CERCLE MONEY AND ISRAEL LOBBY BOX FARAGE IN: Sky News report on polls – Reform not doing so well now. Reform UK slide from first place to third in latest YouGov MRP polling – with the UK headed for a hung parliament dominated by centre left anti-Brexit parties Britain set for Rejoin coalition as pressure to reverse Brexit mounts, new polls suggest Anti-Brexit campaigners have hailed three new mega polls which reveal the next election will provide an historic opportunity for Britain to rejoin the EU. A YouGov MRP poll, which predicts how constituencies would vote, suggested the two pro-Brexit parties – the Tories and Reform UK – would be left stranded on a combined 253 seats while Labour would be the biggest party with 241. Labour would need coalition allies, with the pro-EU Lib Dems projected at 71 seats and Greens on 9 seats enough to get them over the line. With Andy Burnham refusing to rule out putting Rejoin in the next election manifesto for Labour and former prime minister Sir Tony Blair saying he needs a plan to return in a decade, momentum appears to be building for a Brexit election whenever it is called. A Survation MRP poll offered a similar outcome with Labour on 272 and Lib Dems on 69. The pro-Brexit Tories were down to 85 and Reform on 153. A 38 Degrees MRP poll based on tactical voting had Labour on 266 while the Tories had just 79 and reform 62. Polling guru Professor Sir John Curtice said: “‘You’d have the SNP and Plaid there as well who would be willing to back a Brexit policy. So the opportunity [to reverse Brexit] would be there. “Could it push a rethink on Brexit policy? I think we are beginning to anticipate that the Labour Party will be saying something different in its next manifesto, but we’re not quite sure exactly what he’s going to say.” Another leading polling expert Lord Robert Hayward added: “If there was an election immediately then certainly the most likely outcome is an anti-Brexit coalition. But things are so fluid at the moment it could be completely different again in a few months.” However, campaigners believe there is an historic opportunity. Last week The Independent revealed that only four constituencies in England, Wales and Scotland did not oppose reversing Brexit from polling commissioned from YouGov by Best for Britain. Naomi Smith, chief executive of Best for Britain, which campaigns for the UK to restore its EU membership, said: “YouGov’s data finds Reform UK is increasingly vulnerable to tactical voting – an anti-Brexit alliance by another name – but our own landmark mega poll of some 13,400 voters’ preferred EU policy position, conducted via their MRP methodology, takes it even further. “It should be a deafening alarm bell to every Labour MP and strategist that a manifesto commitment to rejoining the EU is the route to securing a Labour-led government at the next general election, and avoiding a Farage-led one.” A major debate in the Commons is set to take place on 12 October from a petition supporting rejoining the EU being pushed by the European Movement UK. So far 23,000 letters have been sent to MPs. Mike Galsworthy, chair of the European Movement UK, said: “It’s looking increasingly likely that we could end up with a coalition government at the next election. The big question would be – what keeps that coalition together for an entire parliament?

BBC – pensioners might have to pay income tax. Income tax thresholds held so low govt has to intervene to stop pensioners paying  State pensioners with no other income will not pay tax Chancellor Rachel Reeves has said that people whose only income comes from the state pension will not have to pay tax. The state pension is set to rise above the normal level for paying tax in April 2027, due to increases in payments and tax thresholds being frozen. But Reeves has confirmed that anyone who receives the state pension but no other income will not have to pay income tax before 2030. The announcement has raised questions over the winners and losers of such a policy. Most pensioners have other pension payments which means they already pay tax, and experts say the move could add further complexity to the system. State pension and tax Anyone solely receiving the new flat-rate state pension – for those who reached state pension age after April 2016 – will get up to £12,547.60 next year. That is just below the income tax threshold of £12,570. That threshold is frozen and highly likely to be breached by the state pension from April 2027, meaning the portion of pension income over this threshold would be taxed. Small tax sums would normally be collected by the Simple Assessment process where HM Revenue and Customs does all the calculations and sends the pensioner a tax demand at the end of the year. But the chancellor said in her speech that, if this was the only source of income people had, then they would not face the administrative hassle. She later told Martin Lewis, founder of Money Saving Expert, that “in this Parliament, they won’t have to pay the tax”. The Conservatives made a similar pledge during the last general election campaign. Fairness questioned About three-quarters of pensioners already pay income tax because they have additional income to the state pension. They include 2.5 million pensioners – including widows and widowers – whose state pension operates under the pre-2016 system. They receive a basic pension and a SERPS pension, which means they pay tax. Steve Webb, partner at pension consultants LCP and former pensions minister, also highlights those with a very small private pension who would have to pay tax. Workers on the same income as the level of state pension would also be taxed, while pensioners would not be. “There is a real risk that pensioners on the new system will be more favourably treated,” Mr Webb said….

4TH REICH FINANCE FASCISM IN UK 3, FOOD: MORRISONS SUPERMARKET Cost of living crisis. Protect Our Plates – private equity company buying out Morrisons. Vulture capitalism. Don’t Shop At MORRISONS UK Again Until You WATCH THIS Protect Our Plates Morrisons has quietly changed almost beyond recognition, and most shoppers have no idea. In this P.O.P investigation we reveal eleven things you need to know before your next shop, from the debt loaded onto the company itself to the “baked from scratch” signs it already admitted aren’t true, then finish with what Morrisons still genuinely does best and how to shop there smart. Hit the hype button and tell us which supermarket we should cover next. In October of 2021, an American private equity firm called Clayton, Dubilier, and Rice bought Morrison’s for around7 billion pounds. Here’s the part that matters most. Of that 7 billion, roughly6.1 billion pounds of debt was loaded directly onto Morrison’s itself. Not onto the buyers, but onto the supermarket’s own balance sheet. Imagine buying a house, but instead of taking out the mortgage in your own name, you somehow make the house itself responsible for repaying the loan used to buy it. Every single room in that house now has to generate income just to cover the cost of its own purchase rather than going towards actually maintaining the place or improving it for the people living there. That’s essentially what happened to Morrison’s overnight back in 2021. To their credit, Morrison’s has made real progress paying that debt down since then, cutting it by roughly2.7 billion pounds through a series of refinancing deals, bringing the outstanding balance down to around3.5 billion by the middle of 2025. That’s genuine progress, and it’s fair to acknowledge it. But even with that progress, a huge amount of cash that should be going into better stores, better pay, and better stock is instead going straight out the door to service debt that had absolutely nothing to do with running a supermarket in the first place. Every pound that leaves the tills to cover interest payments is a pound that isn’t fixing a broken freezer or funding a decent pay rise. Before all of this happened, Morrison’s owned most of what it operated outright. its stores, its bakeries, its manufacturing sites, all with relatively little debt sitting against them. That’s precisely what made it such an attractive target in the first place. A business with that much of its own property. And that little debt is exactly the kind of company a private equity firm looks for because it means there’s plenty of value sitting there to borrow against. Number six, millions spent watching staff, nothing spent on paying them properly. While staff were being told there simply wasn’t enough money for a proper pay rise, Morrison’s has reportedly been investing heavily in technology to monitor its own workforce. Staff have described cameras positioned overhead in stores that photograph shelves every hour, scoring each section on how well stocked it looks and ranking stores against each other in a companywide league table. with pressure from area management to hit a target score by a set time each morning. Separately, staff have also described cameras installed in delivery yards designed to detect whether workers are wearing the correct high visibility clothing, reportedly costing the company somewhere in the range of 14 to6 million pounds to roll out. On top of that, Morrison’s has been rolling out digital shelf edge labels across its stores. A genuinely useful piece of technology in fairness, one that saves time checking prices and correcting errors. But staff themselves have pointed out that the same technology is expected to save the equivalent of several staff shifts a week per store, meaning fewer hours and fewer jobs needed on the shop floor going forward. Read that back for a second. Tens of millions of pounds found for cameras, screens, and monitoring systems in the very same period staff were told there was nothing left over for them…

Sikanda Abbas joins Tony and Martin live. He comes from a Pakistani family that moved to UK in the 1970s. Prophet from the Muslim Hadith on usury, money and the end of times. Eschatology of Judaism, Christianity, and Islam. Are Wahhabis of Jewish Origin? The report relies heavily on the Memoirs of Mr. Hempher, which describe in detail how a British spy to the Middle East, in the middle of the eighteenth century, made contact with Adbul Wahhab, to create a subversive version of Islam, the notorious sect of Wahhabism, which became the founding cult of the Saudi regime. The movement was temporarily suppressed by the Ottomam armies in the middle of the nineteenth century. But with the assistance of the British, the Wahhabis and their Saudi sponsors returned to power and founded their own state in 1932. Since then, the Saudis have collaborated closely with the Americans, to whom they owe their tremendous oil wealth, in funding various Islamic fundamentalist organizations and other American covert operations, particularly the “jihad” in Afghanistan. But the Saudis simulatenously use the immense wealth at their dispossal to disseminate this disruptive brand of Islam to various parts of the world, categorized by some of the largest propaganda campaign in history. Many who defend Wahhabism as a legitimate reform movement of Islam have tried to dismiss the Memoirs as a spurious fabrication. These include Bernard Haykel, Professor in Near Eastern Studies at Princeton University, who, without providing any evidence, presumes the Memoirs to have been created by Ayyub Sabri Pasha. However, while the Memoirs only emerged in the 1970s, Pasha wrote his version of the story already in 1888. Ayyub Sabri Pasha was a well-known Ottoman writer and Turkish naval admiral, who served the Ottoman army in the Arabian Pensinsula, writing several works about the region and it’s history. Including The Beginning and Spreading of Wahhabism, where he recounts Abdul Wahhab’s association and plotting with Hempher. In addition to that revealed in the Hempher Memoirs, the Iraqi intelligence report also makes known some surprising claims, derived from works circulated in Arabic which have not been translated into English. As the report recounts, both Abdul Wahhab, and his sponsor, ibn Saud, who founded the Saudi dynasty, were of Jewish origin.

How Salafism and Wahhabism, extremist versions of the Muslim religion, were pushed by Saudi Arabia and infiltrated mosques and universities in UK, leading up to the war on terror. Muslim Brotherhood and the CIA – books by Mark Curtis, and Robert Dreyfuss. Al-Muhajiroun links to intelligence services. Mad conspiracy theories pushed to muddy the waters. CIA Fight Against Communism Bolsters Radical Islam The CIA’s determination to roll back communism during the Cold War inadvertently allowed radical Islamists to gain a foothold in Europe, according to a new book by Pulitzer Prize-winning author Ian Johnson. A Mosque in Munich: Nazis, the CIA and the Rise of the Muslim Brotherhood in the West details the Nazis’ attempts to create a fifth column within the Soviet empire by becoming allies with Muslim minorities living in the Soviet Union. “The Soviet Union had oppressed Islam, closed many mosques and mistreated many minorities in the Soviet Union, including Muslims,” Johnson tells host Guy Raz. “After the Germans ended up with literally millions of Red Army POWs in the war, they began to realize that many of these were potential soldiers to fight the Soviet Union.” After the war, the CIA and West German intelligence operatives, many of them former Nazis, took over the project. Johnson says the CIA was looking for Muslims who could go into the Third World and speak credibly to counter Soviet propaganda. The Islamic Center of Munich had become the center for the Muslim Brotherhood in Germany and to some extent in Europe. “The CIA set up a large covert propaganda operation in Munich and recruited many of these people,” Johnson says. Sponsor Message The CIA began to support the activities of the Muslim Brotherhood in Europe and elsewhere. But U.S. attention shifted when the Vietnam War heated up, Johnson says, and it wasn’t until the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan in the late 1970s that focus on the project returned. Shortly after the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, Johnson says, there was a desire to cut off all ties with Islamist groups like the Muslim Brotherhood and even to prosecute them. The effort failed, however, because the group could not be linked directly to terrorism. By the second term of the Bush administration, CIA documents show there were efforts to cultivate Muslim Brotherhood groups in Europe for U.S foreign policy aims. Using Islam in this way is a fundamental problem in how we look at the religion, Johnson says. “It’s come back to haunt us again and again,” he says. “But we continue to make the same mistake.” For example, D. Mustafa Turan wrote, in The Donmeh Jews, that Muhammad ibn Abdul Wahhab was a descendant of a family of Donmeh Jews from Turkey. The Donmeh were descendants of followers of the infamous false-messiah of Judaism, Shabbetai Zevi, who shocked the Jewish world in 1666 by converting to Islam. Viewing it as a sacred mystery, Zevi’s followers imitated his conversion to Islam, though secretly keeping to their Kabbalistic doctrines. In Europe, the Shabbeteans were eventually led a century later by Jacob Frank, claiming to be a reincarnation of Zevi. And, according to Rabbi Antelman in To Eliminate the Opiate, to them belonged the Rothschilds who had a hand in the founding of the Bavarian Illuminati. The Donmeh community of Turkey were concentrated in the city of Salonika, which became a hotbed of Masonic activity, and from which the Young Turk movement evolved, which aided in the collapse of the Muslim empire of the Ottoman Turks. There is evidence that Ataturk himself, the founder of the modern Turkish state, was of Donmeh origin as well. Turan maintains that Abdul Wahhab’s grandfather, Sulayman was actually Shulman, having belonged to the Jewish community of Bursa in Turkey. From there he settled in Damascus, where he feigned Islam, but was apparently expelled for practicing sorcery. He then fled to Egypt and he again faced condemnation, so made his way he to the Hijaz, where he got married and fathered Abdul Wahhab. According to the report, the same is claimed in The Donmeh Jews and the Origin of the Saudi Wahabis, Rifat Salim Kabar. A Mosque in Munich Nazis, the CIA, and the Muslim Brotherhood in the West By Ian Johnson.

Secret Affairs: Britain’s Collusion with Radical Islam by Mark Curtis As much of history is appropriated by the media and we are beckoned into an era of endless war, this superb book could not be more timely. Sensational in the best sense, it examines the darkest corners of the imperial past to reveal the truth behind today’s news — John Pilger Unearthing this largely hidden history is a contribution of the highest significance, and could hardly be more timely. — Noam Chomsky This valuable and important book by Mark Curtis, the result of painstaking and extensive research into declassified files on British policy towards the Islamic world over the last half century, presents a far more accurate and balanced picture than the shallow simplicities fed by Bush?s so-called war on terror. It shows in extensive detail how Britain and the US have repeatedly sided with radical Islamic forces in the Middle East and elsewhere as counterweights to check the rise of nationalism, as shock troops to bring about pro-Western regime change, and as proxies to fight wars against the West?s enemies. There is no war between civilizations (Bush), no Manichaean struggle between the good and evil forces of Islam (Blair), rather the ever-present serpentine thread of shifting alliances to maintain British control of key energy resources and Britain?s place in a pro-Western global financial order centred on Saudi Arabia. This is a fascinating account which can change outlooks and deepen comprehension of a hugely misunderstood drama, and it should be compelling reading before any further Middle East wars are set in train. The thousands of pieces of evidence that Curtis has amassed and structured into this remarkably coherent book, present a convincing picture of a country that has been (and continues to be) put at risk through the machinations of unseen and unaccountable people working for secret organisations, whose motives and strategies are as opaque as they are questionable. Yet, even if their purposes remain opaque, there has been an remarkable consistency in the nature of their plottings over the century since the break-up of the Turkish Ottoman empire and the establishment of the nations of the Middle East that were created largely by the British in pursuit of a “divide and rule” policy designed to retain control over the oil wealth in the region. Curtis presents clear evidence that throughout its post-colonial history, beginning even as far back as the 1920s, British governments and Civil Service have exploited Islam and Islamic fundamentalism for its own (obscure) purposes – from the establishment of the Saudi kingdom; the division of India in 1948 to create the strategically useful Muslim state of Pakistan; to the support of the Muslim Brotherhood during Nasser’s control over Egypt; to the backing of both sides during the Israeli-Palestinian wars; to the active support of terrorists (including Bin Laden) during the Afghan-Russian war; to the support of KLA and other terrorists during the Bosnian and Kosovan wars. Even after the 9/11 and 7/7 attacks, Britain continued to harbour known terrorists on its shores, giving them a safe-haven from American, French and other prosecutors. The other consistency in the story is that like the US in its terror campaigns against democratically elected popularist and nationalistic governments in Central and South America, Britain has consistently given support to brutal dictatorships in the Middle East and Asia and actively suppressed nationalist parties and organizations, and undermined popularly elected governments, at the cost of many hundreds of thousand (or, more likely, millions) of innocent lives. Presumably Britain’s elite continues to pursue such policies, but since the secret services who mastermind such activities, do not publicise what they are doing or planning, and since British governments of every ilk seem to acquiesce unquestioningly in whatever MI6 and MI5 do in the name of “public service”, it is unlikely that we will ever know what has been going on until it is too late. Curtis deserves the greatest credit for piecing together this immensely complex jigsaw of evidence. He also deserves credit for his bravery in publishing his findings. It’s hard to imagine that there are not many people both within the British secret agencies and amongst the multitude of terrorist groups that he names, who would like to see him silenced. I urge everyone to read this book. It’s not a pleasant read, but it’s an essential one.

Devil’s Game: How the United States Helped Unleash Fundamentalist Islam by Robert Dreyfuss, an American journalist who covers national security for Rolling Stone magazine, has written a splendid book, part of the very useful American Empire Project. He shows how the US state has followed the British Empire’s example of funding and backing right-wing fundamentalist Islamic activist groups to defeat Arab nationalism. From 1885 on, the British state fostered a pan-Islamic alliance against Russia and the Ottoman Empire. It also backed Ibn Saud, leading to the creation of Saudi Arabia, the Hashemites, who became kings of Iraq and Transjordan, the Muslim Brotherhood, an Islamic fundamentalist party, and Haj Amin, the mufti of Jerusalem. After World War Two, the US state took over Britain’s role. In the 1950s it used the Muslim Brotherhood against President Nasser of Egypt and Prime Minister Mossadegh of Iran. From 1957 on, it allied with Saudi Arabia, whose money funded Islamist banks and madrassas across the world. In the 1970s, the US state used fundamentalists in Jordan and Israel against Syria and the PLO. From 1973 on, it funded the mujehadin in Afghanistan, including Osama bin Laden. Dreyfuss shows that Al Qa’ida is not an existential threat to the USA. It has no access to weapons of mass destruction and since 9/11 it has not fired a shot in the USA. Bush inflated the threat from Al Qa’ida to create a pretext for US expansion into the Middle East and Central Asia. Dreyfuss argues that the US state could have destroyed Al Qa’ida without attacking Afghanistan and Iraq. He maintains that the war on terror was the wrong response to 9/11. It has not led to democracy or security but to tyranny, war and reaction. The US state is now supporting Iraq’s Islamists and still backs the feudal autocracy of Saudi Arabia. As usual, it is backing the worst people in every country, and the worst people back it. Instead, we need to back a Palestinian state and get the USA to withdraw its military presence from the Middle East.

The Clark Inquiry 2013 in to extremism in Muslim schools in Birmingham – the trustees to schools were replaced by military and government officials even though schools were cleared. Trojan horse: the real story behind the fake ‘Islamic plot’ to take over schools – In 2014, documents alleging a conspiracy to Islamise Birmingham schools were leaked to the media, sparking a national scandal. The papers were debunked – but the story remains as divisive as ever. What really happened? After the tabloid allegation of radicalisation dissipated, the key accusation against the teachers – whose hearings were grouped according to which school they taught at and their level of seniority – was that they worked together to promote the “undue influence of Islam”. There is no specific definition of “undue influence”, and much of the defence case rested on showing the statutory obligations on schools to include religion. (Alam, not formally an employee of the schools and not subject to the same procedures, was banned by the DfE for life from having anything to do with education, and accused of “undermining fundamental British values”.) On Tuesday 30 May 2017, a grey morning, the DfE’s professional body, the National College for Teaching and Leadership (NCTL), met to discuss the disciplinary case against the senior leaders connected to the Park View Trust – Razwan Faraz, Lindsey Clark, Hardeep Saini, and Monzoor and Arshad Hussain. The verdict on their lifetime bans from teaching had been delayed for over more than two years, and lawyers for the teachers had filed to have the case thrown out. Faraz didn’t go to Coventry for the hearing; he was expecting another delay and simply couldn’t bear to engage. The only accused to turn up were Lindsey Clark and Arshad Hussain, who broke down in tears before the decision was announced. At around 10.30am, Faraz received a text from his lawyer. “They have dropped the case.” According to the NCTL disciplinary committee, the repeated failure of the government’s lawyers to share crucial evidence from the Clarke inquiry had “brought the integrity of the process into disrepute.” As a result, the case would have to be thrown out. Lindsey Clark’s lawyer, Katie Langdon, summed up her client’s mixed feelings about this outcome: “Although Ms Clark is pleased that the proceedings are not continuing, today’s victory is a hollow one. She had very much fought for, and sought to obtain, a verdict clearing her of any wrongdoing. This, now, is no longer possible.” The decision also meant that the hearings against the other teachers in the Park View Trust’s schools (including Mazhar Hussain) would be dropped. After several years and hundreds of thousands of pounds of public money, just one teacher – the former acting head of Oldknow – has had any disciplinary charges upheld in relation to the Trojan horse case. The other 14 have all had their cases overturned, dropped or dismissed. The verdict doesn’t appear to have changed anyone’s mind about the right and wrongs of the case. “The collapse of the cases doesn’t prove anything one way or another about the plot,” Gilligan told me, citing the fact that it collapsed on a “technicality”. The DfE is doggedly pursuing the issue; some have speculated that they do not want to lose face, given the scale of the national scandal and the amount of public money already spent. Soon after the cases were thrown out, the DfE opened up a new process: to place some of the former Park View teachers, who are now in theory allowed to return to the classroom, on the Disclosure and Barring Service register. They would not only be banned from classrooms, but would not be allowed to work in any setting involving children. There are limited opportunities to challenge such allegations. Three years after the Trojan horse letter surfaced, there is still no proof that a conspiracy existed. The central claim that remains about Park View and the other implicated schools is that they had become too Islamic, that some invisible line was crossed from the compulsory level of religion that schools must provide to the point where it was “undue”. But in an education system that is not secular, such as Britain’s, there is no unambiguous way to draw such boundaries.

Government trying to get influence in Mosques. Prevent programme ‘spying on our young people’, say east London imams Muslim religious leaders in Newham claim government’s Prevent anti-radicalisation strategy causing ‘breakdown of trust’ Muslim religious leaders in one of the most ethnically diverse boroughs in Britain have criticised the government’s programmes to stop people turning to extremism and terrorist violence as “divisive” and leading to a “breakdown in trust”. In a rare sign of public discontent, east London imams – backed by teachers, community organisations and student unions – have claimed the measures adopted under the anti-radicalisation Prevent scheme and the Counter-Terrorism Act result in “spying on our young people” and lead to “increasing division and to a breakdown of trust in schools and colleges”. In a statement, religious and community leaders in Newham – who regularly draw thousands of locals into their mosques – warn that the schemes are “exclusively targeting young Muslims for the views they hold on religion or issues such as government foreign policy”. They claim in recent months that “normal Muslim religious practice” has been openly targeted under the programmes and that this hardening coincided with the council’s hiring of a former director of the Quilliam Foundation, a UK counter-terrorism thinktank that has long argued for a tougher line on non-violent extremism. Imams point out that earlier this year a school attempted to ban the wearing of the jilbab, a long and loose-fit coat or garment worn by Muslim women, and had to back down after appeals from parents. Another free school, with 200 Muslim students, closed down its prayer room – forcing pupils to pray on Friday in the local parks. Is Prevent stifling free speech in classrooms? ‘You worry they could take your kids’: is the Prevent strategy demonising Muslim schoolchildren? Read more Imam Khalil Laher, who preaches at various mosques in the borough including to an 800-strong congregation and has signed the statement, said: “My biggest problem is that these are normal religious values and for many Muslims are considered obligations of the faith. We have not been consulted about the implementation of Prevent. We have not met any police officers. There’s been nothing on the ground.” With a third of the population describing themselves as Muslim, Newham has the second highest Islamic demographic in the country. Despite this, community organisations argue, the council appointed the ex-Quilliam Foundation director Ghaffar Hussain as its Prevent officer in December last year…

Sikander Abbas – I support you through your challenges and equip you to become your own healer. My aim is to provide you with healing methods and practical tools so you can take control of your emotional health. Each of us is a unique individual, which is why having worked with clients experiencing trauma, PTSD, fear, anxiety, stress, addictions, grief, depressions, panic, ADHD and other emotional issues, I understand the importance of a personalised approach. This is why I use a range of techniques depending on my assessment of what works best for you. Together we shall work through your issue so you can heal, balance and grow. I know it is only when we heal the root causes of our issues, we are truly able to create meaningful positive change in our lives. Such change from within has a profound impact upon not just our emotional health but all aspects of our being. What Sessions Involve In each session we identify the root emotional cause behind your ailment. We then look to resolve that emotion using a range of techniques that you shall become familiar with such as chi meridians, breath work, intention, Emotional Freedom Techniques, Integral Eye Movement Therapy, self-affirmations, journaling, and grounding — powerful methods of changing how you feel about yourself and life. What Is EFT? Emotional Freedom Therapy is based on the ancient Chinese practice of tapping on the body’s meridian or chi points. This helps to process and release stuck emotions. Blocked emotions not only affect your mental but also your physical health. Negative emotions and limiting thoughts if held in the body for too long can lead to not just mental but also physical health issues. I help you to identify, understand and heal those blockages. Healing means to listen to the messages your body is trying to communicate and then make changes, which create ease and flow — rather than disease and repression — in your body and life.

Nazis developed both nuclear weapons | & MK ULTRA brainwashed assassins for USA | Israel behind the 7/7 London Bombings: Tony Gosling’s documentary, and article | Videos of full shows | Economic essentials: Michael Hudson | Blackrock/Vanguard | Why/how Israel Assassinated JFK & RFK | Operation Gladio | Tony on Brexit & (4th Reich) Traitors of Arnhem | Creation vs. Evolution | God vs. Lucifer | ‘Great Plan’ for 3 World Wars | Devil Worship: The Rise Of Satanism | Nuclear Armed IDF Doomsday Cult | Aanirfan | Armageddonists I have known: Nick Land (1976-8) | George Monbiot (1995-7) | Manna for the Revelation Generation: CONSPIRACY CLASSICS, longer interviews/lectures

Sir Hugh “Sir Hugh”, also known as “The Jew’s Daughter” or “The Jew’s Garden”, is a traditional British folk song, Child ballad No. 155, Roud No. 73, a folkloric example of a blood libel which was rewritten by the band to remove any antisemitic lyrics. The original texts are not preserved, but the versions written down from the 18th century onwards show a clear relationship with the 1255 accusations of the murder of Little Saint Hugh of Lincoln by Jews in Lincoln, making it likely that the known versions derive from compositions made around that time. Mother mother make my bed. Make for me a winding sheet. Wrap me up in a cloak of gold. See if I can sleep. Four and twenty bonny bonny boys playing at the hall. Along came little Sir Hugh, he played with them all. He kicked the ball very high, he kicked the ball so low, He kicked it over a castle wall where no one dared to go. Out came a lady gay, she was dressed in green. “Come in, come in little Sir Hugh, fetch your ball again”. “I won’t come in, I can’t come in without my play mates all. For if I should, I know you would, cause my blood to fall”. She took him by the milk white hand, led him to the hall. Till they came to a stone chamber where no one could hear him call. She sat him on a golden chair, she gave him sugar sweet. She lay him on a dressing board and stabbed him like a sheep. Out came the thick thick blood, out came the thin. Out came the bonny heart’s blood till there was none within. She threw him in the old draw well fifty fathoms deep. The title is a corruption of “Little Saint Hugh”. Sir Hugh: The “Jew’s daughter” lures Hugh into her garden. Some boys are playing with a ball, in Lincoln. They accidentally throw it over the wall of a Jew’s house (or castle). The daughter of the Jew comes out, dressed in green, and beckons to a boy to come in to fetch it. He replies that he cannot do this without his playmates. She entices him in with fruit and a gold ring. Once he has sat down on a throne, she stabs him in the heart “like a sheep”. There is much blood. When the boy fails to come home, his mother concludes that he is skylarking. She sets out to find him, with a rod to beat him. From beyond the grave, the boy asks his mother to prepare a funeral winding sheet, and that he is “asleep”. In some versions he asks that if his father calls for him, the father is to be told that he is “dead”. In some versions the boy’s corpse shines “like gold”. In some versions the Jew’s daughter catches the blood in a basin and puts a prayer book at his head and a Bible at his feet.

Part Two – International news review, Accelerationist, Armageddonist reports and investigations

President Xi visits US. Trump’s speech at UN – no nuclear Iran. Trump agrees for Ukraine to produce patriot missiles. Many countries walk out on Netanyahu’s speech at UN. Trump’s disruption to TV coverage during Xi visit frustrates Chinese officials President Donald Trump spent months plotting ways to impress Xi Jinping. But even after enlisting two military bands, ordering up a flyover, speeding construction of his new helipad and rolling out a literal red carpet, Trump ended up directly undercutting what the Chinese leader craved most: Network television cameras. Trump’s abrupt ban on three news outlets — including CNN — disrupted months of careful planning for Xi’s state visit, frustrating both US and Chinese officials over the limited coverage of a summit meant to showcase the two men together in front of a global audience, according to multiple people familiar with the dynamic. The suspension of pooled TV coverage for the entirety of Xi’s first day at the White House caused consternation among the Chinese leader’s allies, who had hoped the trip would broadcast him widely as a peer of the president of the world’s most powerful nation. For Trump, who had waited months to show off in front of Xi, it simply marked the latest indignity amid a particularly turbulent stretch for his ailing presidency. “The event was magnificent — Actually made for Television but, because they’re Fake News, and because they knew how good it would be, they didn’t want credit to be given to ‘TRUMP,’ they refused to be there,” Trump vented Thursday on his social media platform. The episode amounted to a self-inflicted wound during what Trump otherwise envisioned as a multiday spectacular welcoming of China’s authoritarian leader, complete with ceremonial events showing off his White House renovations and a tour of the US’ most treasured founding documents. It also served as an example of the wider repercussions of Trump’s personal feud with the press, threatening to inject fresh tension into a diplomatic relationship with China that the administration has worked to keep stable ahead of November’s midterm elections. After Trump barred CNN, MS NOW and Politico from the White House last week, the Chinese embassy contacted several US television networks to discuss how the move would affect coverage of Xi’s visit, two sources familiar with the discussions told CNN. And despite China’s state media outlets dispatching more than 100 staffers to cover the summit, Chinese foreign ministry adviser Wu Xinbo told CNN Friday that it had been “regrettable” that more footage hadn’t made it to the American public. “It could have helped improve the atmosphere in US-China relations,” Wu said.

Iran leader Masoud Pezeshkian speech. Online voices rally behind Pezeshkian’s UN speech, condemn Western double standards Online reactions have widely supported Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian’s speech at the 81st United Nations General Assembly, highlighting his account of terrorism victims in Iran, criticism of double standards over nuclear oversight and support for the Palestinian people. Pezeshkian’s speech on Wednesday recalled the suffering of victims of terrorism in Iran and the families of those killed in the country. His remarks also rejected the false narrative surrounding Iran’s nuclear program and drew attention to Israel’s undeclared nuclear arsenal and the lack of international inspections there. Prabhu Chawla, editorial director of The Indian Express, urged his followers to listen carefully to Pezeshkian, writing that Israel possesses many weapons of mass destruction without facing inspections while all attention remains focused on Iran. “Valid point,” Chawla added, saying that international monitoring mechanisms should not be discriminatory. Pathikrit Sen Gupta, senior editor of News 18, highlighted the same issue by quoting Pezeshkian who said: “Nukes are in Israel but IAEA inspectors are in Iran.” He noted that Pezeshkian exposed “Western hypocrisy”. Daily The Destination, a news and current affairs account on X, pointed to Iran’s continued emphasis on diplomacy, posting: “Iran Rejects US Pressure, Keeps Door Open Diplomacy.” M World, a news account covering international affairs, praised Pezeshkian for displaying “heartbreaking photographs” reflecting the severe impact of US-Israeli aggression on Iranian civilians and challenging the international community at the UN General Assembly. Mario Nawfal, a media and political activist and host of the Mario Nawfal Show, also reposted a message from one of his followers endorsing Pezeshkian’s remarks on Israel’s actions in Gaza, describing attacks on Palestinian communities as acts of terror and referring to more than 80,000 Palestinian civilians killed in Gaza.

Russia’s position on Ukraine war. Lavrov on Europe’s “Contribution to Peace Efforts” in Ukraine | RU-EN Interpretation
#UkraineCrisis #PeaceTalks #RussiaUkraine #MinskAgreements #IstanbulTalks #Anchorage #UNSecurityCouncil #SergeyLavrov

FALSE FLAG ON EUROPE IMMINENT? Warren Thornton on possible upcoming false flag attacks from his contacts in the military. WARRENTHORNTON.COM @WARRENTSHOW THE FALSE FLAG These are the areas that are the targets. The Mallorca airport in Spain. The Sorrento Continental Hotel in Italy. The Promenade De Anglais, Nice. The area to be launched from west of Sardinia. The agencies involved CIA, French Naval Intelligence Services and the Ukrainian SBU. The method 3 Gerbera Drones recovered from Russian attacks. To kill civilians and trigger European entry into the war. Further details on our news show now. We have five independent sources. Two French Naval Intelligence staff. Two Spanish Embassy staff. One Ukrainian SBU member. We stand by our story 100%. #USA #CIA #SBU #FNI #France #Spain #Italy #drones #FalseFlag #news #newsupdate #newsupdates

Andy Burnham’s speech at UN – Russia’s information warfare in UK – new Centre for Disinformation Defence to be set up. New UK agency to fight ‘information warfare’ from likes of Russia, Burnham tells UN.  PM aims to ‘stem poisonous tide’ of disinformation and deepfakes with National Centre for Information Defence, a kind of Orwellian BBC Verify, paid for by taxpayers, which attempts to boost government lies and disinformation by betraying the hundreds of thousands of Brits who died fighting Hitler and twisting facts to suit the WEF Bilderberg foreign war narrative. 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5xjP-FoT__k

Fabian Society meets Jacob Rees Mogg on GB News to call for jailing of anti-war protesters and conscription as well as telling Brits that e have a duty to save Britain (in Ukraine) and some of us might die in the process. We may need to fight Russia. Fabian society is pro fighting Russia. [Yes Minister – we have to have Russia as a threat VIDEO]. Jacob Rees-Mogg urges Brits to ‘do their duty’ [Stiff Upper Lip video] – even if some of us ‘have to die’ It’s a stinker, it really is – and Jacob Rees-Mogg may have just cemented his status as Britain’s most out-of-touch politician… You have to say, a multi-millionaire Tory politician coming out with this in a work of satire would even be too much. Instead, Jacob Rees-Mogg actually filmed himself saying these words, then even more inexplicably, decided to post them to his social media channels. Jacob Rees-Mogg misses the mark with call to ‘do your duty’ The former government minister was hammered from all sides of the political spectrum on Monday, after he went on an eight-minute rant compelling the British public to ‘do their duty’ and maintain a stiff upper lip. However, his views on how far that commitment must stretch has caused uproar. Speaking to camera in a rather posh and upmarket dwelling, Jacob Rees-Mogg argued that Brits must fight for their country, it risk it being ‘taken over’ by other forces. He then went on to state that some people ‘may have to die to save their country’ – and his remarks have left a rather sour taste. “It is not impossible that in the next few years we may face a war. If that happens, we will need people who want to join the armed services and go out and do their duty. There may even be circumstances where people have to die to save their country, as seen in wars before.” “That is something that makes a country survive. If people aren’t willing to do their duty, then the country will be taken over by another country. This is partly why Ancient Rome fell. Duty is a noble thing, and it is not always easy, but it is the right thing to do.” | Jacob Rees-Mogg ‘Send your kids first’ – social media responds with rage To say the reception has been hostile would be an understatement. Using Twitter metrics as a indicator of sentiments, JRM has received over six times more replies to his post than favourites (at the time of writing) – and a cursory glance shows support for his rallying call is very few, and very far between. The online pile-on has been amplified by right-wing voices, with the likes of Tommy Robinson urging the GB News host to ‘send his children to war first’. After showing the same political instincts which saw him turfed out of office in 2024, Mr. Rees-Mogg will indeed need a ‘stiff upper lip’ to handle the backlash here…

City AM – diesel prices record high and UK has only 42 days of reserves left. [Sky News video] Coming economic crash or depression. Naked Capitalism blog. Diesel ban: UK to be ‘even more exposed’ if Trump follows through on export threat The UK could be “exposed” by a diesel crisis. After Trump announced a ban on exports of diesel, Mauricio Alencar explores how it could impact the UK economy. President Trump’s newest trade threat sent markets into a frenzy once again on Friday. Earlier this week, Trump said he would back Republican proposals to halt exports of diesel in order to ease prices ahead of mid-term elections in November. US Treasury secretary Scott Bessent said there was a review underway of whether a ban could work as American diesel prices reached record highs at over £4.87 a gallon. Fuel prices could put Britain under threat. Reform UK’s Treasury spokesman Robert Jenrick reportedly wrote to Bessent to warn that a ban would be a “big mistake”. Just as in the US, anger over spiralling fuel prices reflects the salience of motorists’ concerns in the debate around the cost of living. Rachel Reeves’ previous moves to freeze fuel duty at successive fiscal statements have been welcomed by the likes of the Royal Automobile Club (RAC) Foundation. But researchers at the organisation are now warning that average diesel prices are likely to surpass £2 a litre. Adam Bell, a consultant at decarbonisation consulting group Stonehaven, has been widely quoted warning in tabloids failing to rule out the prospect of diesel surging above £3 a litre as a result of a potential ban. Panmure Liberum analysts believe it was “not unreasonable” to predict that diesel prices would jump to £2.50 a litre. Trump may yet fail to follow through on his threats. Analysts at Fitch, the credit ratings agency, said a 90-day ban would be “highly controversial” and may fail to get approval from energy secretary Chris Wright or interior secretary Dough Burgum. Oil and industry lobbyists may also fight back against a plan with questionable political upsides. Research suggested that the impact on prices would be “uneven and potentially short-lived” given the US fuel market was concentrated towards the south easterly parts of the country. A ban on exports could also encourage local producers to cut supply given access to overseas markets has allowed companies to improve profit. Anyhow, the UK may be underprepared for any scenario. New diesel car registrations have been on a rapid downward slope since 2015 although just under 38 per cent of all vehicles on UK roads are diesel, the car insurance firm Quotezone showed earlier this year. Lorries and other large goods vehicles boost the numbers as diesel cars make up a smaller proportion, underlining the importance of the fuel for the movement of products around the country. Energy Information Administration data alsfo shows that the UK is one of the biggest buyers of diesel from across the pond. It buys less than the likes of the Netherlands, Mexico and Chile. The UK also only has 42 days’ worth of imports for emergency stocks of diesel in July 2026, according to Sky News analysis of various data sources. Government data from last year shows that the US accounts for about a third of all UK diesel imports. Thomas Pugh, chief economist at the accountancy RSM, said there would be an “immediate effect” on the UK if a ban was imposed. He added that the main sectors to be hit would be road haulage, agriculture, construction and distribution.

Screenshot

Profiteering of supermarkets and energy giants – huge profits since 2019. Wars brought in after economic collapses. [MORRISONS, originally a family business, was taken over by a US private equity firm in 2021 who are now gutting the company VIDEO] UK companies’ profits soar amidst ‘cost of living crisis’ Titles are generated by AI from Meta For YEARS now we’ve been told there’s a “cost of living crisis.” Everything had to get more expensive. Food had to go up. Fuel had to go up. Energy had to go up. Every few months there seemed to be another reason why ordinary people just had to suck it up, tighten their belts and accept that this was the new normal. So I thought… okay. Let’s actually follow the money. Go back to 2019 and look at what some of these companies were making then compared with what they’re making now. Tesco reported £3.128 BILLION adjusted operating profit in 2024/25. ? Shell reported $18.1 BILLION income in 2025. And while everyone else was worrying about their bills, Shell also spent $13.9 BILLION on share buybacks and paid $8.5 BILLION in dividends in that ONE year. ? But the one that really got me was fuel. The Competition and Markets Authority found supermarket fuel margins had risen dramatically from their 2019 levels and estimated that increased retailer margins cost UK motorists MORE THAN £1.6 BILLION EXTRA in 2023 alone. £1,600,000,000. Extra. In ONE YEAR. The CMA even found evidence that at least one supermarket had significantly increased its internal fuel-margin targets and that other supermarkets may have adjusted their pricing behaviour in response. ? And THIS is what pisses me off!!! We keep hearing about a ‘cost of living crisis’ as though everyone is suffering equally…They’re not. When you’re choosing which food doesn’t make it into your trolley this week, somebody else is announcing billions in profit. When you’re putting £20 in the car instead of filling it up, somebody somewhere is making a margin on every litre. When you’re scared to put the heating on, you’re still expected to accept another increase because apparently that’s just the world we live in now…At what point do we stop asking why everything costs so much and start asking who is benefiting from it costing so much? Because costs rising is one thing…Margins rising is another. And when an actual UK competition regulator tells us motorists paid £1.6 BILLION extra in a single year because retail fuel margins had increased compared with 2019, I think we’re entitled to ask some bloody questions. They keep calling it a cost of living crisis. Looking at some of these numbers… it certainly hasn’t been a profit crisis. Follow. The. Money. ?? 2021 Matt Hancock stated ‘we are all in the same boat.’ No, we are not. Some are in luxury yachts (like the MPs and fuel giants)… some are in tiny rowing boats trying to plug up the holes in their boat and using the buckets to get rid of the water slowly sinking them. Not equal, at all.

RT – press gangs in Ukraine grab men off streets for front line. ‘Every day, hundreds of people flee Ukraine… there is a constant risk of being seized’ RT Kiev persists with its violent conscription campaign, forcefully grabbing people off the streets and sending them to the front lines. As public anger grows, the draft shows no sign of slowing down. We spoke exclusively with a Ukrainian blogger and activist who fled the country by crossing the western Tisa River. He says his compatriots live in fear while the leadership in Kiev shields its own relatives from the violence.

Jacob Rees Mogg – Bring back duty and the stiff upper lip – talk. It is your Duty to Die for Great Britain.

Sergei Lavrov at Security Council in UN – self determination of Countries. Lavrov on Europe’s “Contribution to Peace Efforts” in Ukraine | RU-EN Interpretation #UkraineCrisis #PeaceTalks #RussiaUkraine #MinskAgreements #IstanbulTalks #Anchorage #UNSecurityCouncil #SergeyLavrov

Putin opening address at Arms Manufacturing Committee. Putin Warns NATO Over Baltic Drills & Nuclear Triad Readiness | RU-EN Interpretation #StateArmamentProgram #RussianMilitary #NuclearTriad #MilitaryTechnology #NATO #Ukraine #EuropeanSecurity #RussiaEurope #DefenseIndustry

ELECTION FIXING: Anthony Lowenstein interviewed by Richard Sanders on DDN – Israeli public bamboozled. “IT’S A TOTAL HIJACK”: How Ex-Mossad Spies Are Running Foreign Governments Antony Loewenstein on Double Down News Private Israeli intelligence firms, ex-Mossad operatives, and automated bot networks are quietly manipulating foreign elections and hijacking democratic governments around the world. In this exclusive interview for Double Down News, investigative journalist Antony Loewenstein exposes the covert industry turning military-grade psychological warfare into a lucrative global business—and reveals how these networks are flooding your social media feed to shape reality. 00:00 – The Global Election Hijack 01:45 – Ex-Mossad Spies For Hire 04:12 – Inside the Secret Bot Farms 06:55 – How Foreign Governments Were Targeted 09:40 – Flooding Your Feed: Algorithm Manipulation 12:15 – The Media Silence & Black Cube 15:05 – The Threat to Global Democracy

Al Jazeera – Palestinians banned from standing and voting in upcoming Israeli elections. Israel bars Arab parties and candidates from election, Ofer Cassif calls ban unlawful Al Jazeera English Israel’s Central Elections Committee voted to disqualify the United Arab List and the Joint List from next month’s elections. It also banned candidates Sami Abu Shehadeh and Ofer Cassif, accusing them of supporting terror and denying Israel as a Jewish state. The Joint List says Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and far-right Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir are trying to discourage 1.2 million Palestinian citizens of Israel from voting. The decisions need final approval by Israel’s Supreme Court. Ofer Cassif told Al Jazeera the move was predictable, unlawful and politically motivated. He rejected allegations of supporting armed struggle, saying he and his colleagues have always opposed violence and supported non-violent struggle. Cassif said the attorney general opposed the disqualifications and found no legal basis, arguing that politicians should not have the power to disqualify other politicians. He said he is confident the Supreme Court will overturn the bans and warned that Israel would become a “fully-fledged fascist dictatorship” if they stand.

‘Naza’ Israeli made film about Israeli computer systems used to deliberately kill Palestinian civilians. The critically acclaimed film, produced with the team behind the Zone of Interest and directed by Oscar-winning film-makers Yuval Abraham and Rachel Szor, includes testimony from 24 Israeli military insiders, shot at night on the rooftops of Tel Aviv. Abraham and Szor are the two Israeli directors of the four behind No Other Land, which won the Oscar for best documentary in 2025. It will be released in cinemas in more than 50 countries in the coming weeks, and then will stream on the Guardian’s website, for free, from late November  NAZA, Israeli film on Gaza, to stream for free after theatrical run Co-director Yuval Abraham says documentary exposing Israeli abuses will be available online in November. A documentary that accuses Israel of using AI to carry out mass civilian killings in Gaza will be available to stream online for free once its theatrical rollout in more than 50 countries is complete. Israeli filmmaker Yuval Abraham, who co-directed NAZA with fellow Israeli filmmaker Rachel Szor, announced on Thursday that viewers will be able to stream the award-winning film from November on The Guardian’s website. The UK newspaper helped produce the film. “I know there is enormous demand to watch the film, and I hope that in this way, everyone will soon be able to see it: whether in cinemas or online in a few weeks,” Abraham said in a post on X. “We made the film to spark a public discussion about the [Israeli] government’s actions in Gaza, the killing of more than 73,000 people, most of them civilians, the normalisation of a war of extermination, of the notion that ‘there are no uninvolved’,” he added. NAZA, which means “collateral damage” in Hebrew, will premiere in the United States on Saturday at the New York Film Festival. The documentary is also due to premiere in several other countries, including the United Kingdom, France, Germany and Canada. NAZA is 80 minutes long and is the result of a nearly three-year investigation into Israel’s genocidal war on Gaza. The documentary is based on testimony from Israeli military and intelligence sources whose identities have been concealed. One of the film’s subjects described the process of using AI to kill Palestinians in the enclave as “insanely fun” and said it was like playing a “video game”. Another described it as a “mission”. Advertisement The sources explain in detail an AI system called Lavender, which they said was used to identify assassination targets. Israel oversees a system of mass surveillance in Gaza, monitoring people’s phone calls, movements and interactions. Lavender allegedly uses this data when deciding who to assassinate and is believed to have an error rate of up to 10 percent. According to another of the film’s subjects, an attack was approved despite knowledge that as many as 500 civilians could be killed. NAZA was awarded the Special Jury Prize at this year’s Venice International Film Festival. Israel has been condemned by several human rights organisations for its atrocities in Gaza. Amnesty International and Doctors Without Borders, known by its French acronym MSF, among others, say Israel is committing a genocide…..  

Netanyahu speech at UN – mass walkout. Watch from New York as Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu addresses world leaders at the UN General Assembly. 

Steve Jermy and Douglas Mc Gregor on Putin’s post-election plans for the Ukraine war and Eurpean leaders who support it- Novorossiya. Putin will have a clear run to basically continue to prosecute the war uh in Ukraine as he sees fit. And that means basically conquering all of Detsk within the next 12 months. Uh is is my sense. I see there’s no real challenge to to the kind of the I mean the United is a bit like the single kind of political party in Singapore. You know, it just dominates everything and nothing else can really kind of uh impede on that. You know, you’ve had Nani, we know what happened with that. I mean, that wasn’t even fully kind of nationally mobilized. So I see yeah it’s just a mandate to kind of keep going and keep sort of the Europeans on the back foot you know and continuing politically and economically to fragment against ever more oppressive and corrupt Zilinski regime that’s struggling to stay alive just politically within its own skin. I mean that’s what I see happening. How about you? Well, a couple of my Russian sources have told me that there’s a general feeling that after the election is over and Putin’s installed in power and has control that there will be a mobilization and [clears throat] there’ll be emphasis on ending the war this year as opposed to letting it drag out for another year. I you don’t know when you talk to Russians what’s real and what isn’t anymore than if you asked an American in Ohio, you know, outside of Cincinnati, how would he know really either. So I I never put a lot of store into what I hear until I see some evidence for it. So that’s why I was wondering what you thought would happen. And and I think you’re right. I think we’re going to come out with Putin stronger uh as a result of the election. He’ll be in power. uh I think Lavough everybody on the team will will be there. Then then we should know relatively quickly after that what the real direction will be. One of the things that people keep talking about is the removal of Gazimoff. And now I don’t know if that’s because they just don’t like him, people generally in the public, but I I understand there’s still a lot of discontent inside the Russian senior military leadership with him. And he’s blamed for a lot of the sort of slowness and uh lethargic approach to operations. I I don’t know, Jeremy, do you know anything about that? I don’t know. I mean the name I’ve heard of course is Servic and um Doug and I don’t know whether that will or will not be the case. I mean what’s been interesting me is what the overall the overall objective is not in terms of demilitarization and denazification. I mean that’s understood in terms of what will be um what I would call the the right the right amount of territory to secure to achieve his objectives. And I’ve I I have for some time thought that the minimalist view would be it’s the Donbass and the Eastern Oblasts and Crimea of course but the maximalist view would be noia and I did heard for the first time about a month ago Putin say noir and talk about it. Now I don’t know whether that’s still the case because noia which is the other the next four west of the is a different um kettle of fish when you’re trying strategically but I thought that was quite an interesting thing for him to say. So, it made me wonder whether that’s his maximist objective…

Radio4All download pages
COMPLETE SHOW AND FULL INTERVIEWS [right click to download]
#1 –
Complete 4hr show – [right click to download]
Full interviews with…
#2 – Jacob Rees Mogg Ukraine War Paul Richards Fabian Society Jail War Protesters Introduce Conscription GB News – 00:15:00
#3 – Protect Our Plates Morrisons US private equity owners are killing it with over 16 billion debt – 00:20:00
#4 – UN Iran President Pezeshkian addrresses UNGA 2026 – 00:20:00
#5 – UN US President Trump addresses UNGA Session 2026 – 00:40:00
#6 – UN UK PM Burnham Addresses UNGA Session 2026 – 00:20:00
#7 – UN Israel PM Netanyahu Addresses UNGA Session 2026 – 00:40:00
#8 – Antony Loewenstein Mossad Election Fixing How Ex-Israeli Spies Are Running Foreign Governments DDN – 00:30:00
#9 – Col Doug Macgregor Cdre Steve Jermy_ After This Weekends Vote Putin Finishes the War HIS Way – 01:00:00
#10 – What Happened To The Canary ex-editor Kerry-Ann Mendoza Crispin Flintoff – 00:09:00
#11 – UN Russian FM Sergey Lavrov Ukraine statement at UNSC – 00:15:00
#12 – EXCLUSIVE Neil McEvoy Exposes Plaid Cymru WEF Policy to Breakup the UK and Death Threats – 00:45:00

Tony’s paperback and eBooks Traitors Of Arnhem, Siege Of Heaven; Siege Of Heaven Reader – all available for donation, or to buy, via www.bilderberg.org

The Bristol Politics Show CANCELLED and attempts to intimidate us

July 2024 – Tony, Dave and Martin’s NOT The BCfm Politics show was CANCELLED/EVICTED from their PRSC studio in a no fault, no notice, no appeal, eviction by Chloe Slater of The People’s Republic of Stokes Croft (PRSC) arts centre – An email from Chloe and Keith Cowling explained that: ‘Transphobic’ leaflets, which we were not shown, had been left in the building by a recent guest (who denied it) making Transsexual users of the building feel ‘offended’ and ‘unsafe’. To quote: ‘Please let us know when you or Dave would like to come and retrieve your equipment and drop off your keys. Kind regards’ PRSC Directors (Keith Cowling, chair) PRSC / Stokes Croft China 17-35 Jamaica St Bristol BS2 8JP. Chloe Slater (formerly young man Jez and now self-defined as ‘she’) also made it difficult for us to retrieve the last of our equipment by inferring we couldn’t be trusted, we were made to wait in the cold outside their building for over 30 minutes to return their mixing desk and retrieve our remaining kit in December 2024. 

[UPDATE channel restored by YT in July 2025] October 2022 – Tony’s Public Enquiry Channel opened in March 2008, with 13 million views, over 1,600 videos and 26,000 subscribers is removed under false pretences by YouTube – A video Tony recorded in New Zealand ‘Bill Gates, ID2020 & Revelation: Quaker Tony Gosling on Covid 19 & the Bible’ and uploaded on 8th April 2020 got a ‘third strike’ but YouTube’s ‘medical misinformation’ regime was introduced in September 2021 so should not have included as ‘strikes’ videos uploaded before that date.  Documentary makers are just about the only public interest investigators left in the NATO zone. From the top down, our mainstream media, police, political parties & intelligence services are being compromised by feudal banksters, secret societies and the mafia. Key people intimidated by psychopathic black magic types and their pliable drones who will even kill to take over positions of power? Just search for “John Scarlett” and “Dodgy Dossier” and you’ll see what I mean. The Zionists are every bit as fundamentalist and twisted as the leaders and followers of ISIS. Register here and join us in the discussion as we wriggle free of the psychopaths, back to sanity http://www.911forum.org.uk

March 2020 – BCfm’s weekly Politics Show presented by Tony Gosling with Irish Republican Labour activist Martin Summers was forced off FM, now online only by station manager Pat Hart. He decided the show should be ‘rested, due to the pandemic’ on 24 March 2020 and then refused to communicate at all when we requested to do the show remotely. Bristol Community FM (BCfm) charity ‘CEO’ Patrick Hart is a long-time personal friend of Bristol’s all-powerful right-wing ‘Labour’ mayor Marvin Rees. Pat Hart has a private property portfolio on the continent and also does Public Relations work for property speculators who are taking over community facilities such as Redfield Cinema. Now on Internet only NOT The BCfm Politics Show is available 17:00-c. 20:00 live on Fridays. Pat Hart replaced us with a dumbed-down student show repeating MSM stories called The Bristol Agenda. If you’d like to share your views on his deliberate dumbing-down and pro-Covid jab mismanagement you can contact UK broadcasting regulator Ofcom or BCfm board chair and the ‘Don’ himself, here.

February 2019 – Ofcom complaint result: UKLFI exposed as creation of Israeli foreign ministry – Bristol Post article: BCfm cleared after being reported to Ofcom for anti-semitic conspiracy theories – It could have resulted in BCfm radio station being shut down if the complaint was upheld Tony Gosling reported to Ofcom by UK Lawyers for Israel after being accused of anti-semitism A Bristol radio station, which had one of its programmes reported for anti-semitism and racism has been cleared by Ofcom. The radio regulatory body received a complaint from “UK Lawyers for Israel’ over a show on BCfm radio, hosted by investigative journalist Tony Gosling. The weekly politics show, on the popular community radio station based in Easton, was reported for several allegations on a show which aired on November 23. Tony Gosling, who was a former BBC journalist between 1989 and 1993, has been producing and presenting ‘The Tony Gosling Politics’ show every week on BCFM radio for 11 years. They have released a statement which reads: “Whilst we are supportive of all our volunteer presenters, The Tony Gosling Politics Show only represents approximately ten percent of our political output content wise, and less than two per cent of our entire weekly output.” Mr Gosling’s programme looks at local politics and he interviews a range of councillors and MPs in the city. The show is also perhaps more well known for its alternative look at international politics, and he has a cult following online from across the world. Mr Gosling has made regular appearances on national media including the politics show with Andrew Neil on BBC One, and international channels such as Russia Today, Channel1 Russia, NTV, and recently for both Turkish and Lebanon TV.

November 2012 – Tony gets death threats on the phone from the Jewish Defence League – ‘you’re a dead man walking’ – a man calls him and Tony records the call. Audio of UK Jewish Defence League (JDL) death threat against British journalist Tony Gosling (2012) – Avon and Somerset police Special Branch investigate, trace the caller, and after six months report to Tony that the individual has been served a caution that they will proceed with a prosecution for harassment under the 1861 offences against the person act. Seems pretty clear this death threat was issued alongside the lies, copied below, which were published on their blog by London based UK JDL in November 2012.  Firstly Tony Gosling is not a ‘homophobe’. That accusation was first made in an article published by the ‘Harry’s Place’ blog, penned by Zionist David Toube and propelled by him anonymously into Private Eye in 2008. It refers to Gosling’s criticism of senior teachers at Bannerman Road Primary school in Bristol who used homosexual early learning picture books against the express wishes of the parent governors. His criticism was about the deception by teaching staff not because of the homosexual content of the books. Secondly, if you follow the JDL link you’ll find what Tony Gosling actually says about the ‘Protocols Of The Learned Elders Of Zion’ says “…I don’t think there is much doubt that the Protocols are fake…” Thirdly he is not a member of Bristol Palestine Solidarity Campaign and has never been to any of their meetings.

Autumn 2014 – Tony’s documentary production and distribution business shut down by its bank. Our thriving Co-op business bank account ordered closed for undisclosed reasons. Tony Gosling and Ben Edwards founded i-Contact Video Network to distribute documentaries on VHS video and DVD and to make their own documentaries as well as attend news events and sell video footage to TV news channels. Amongst the films we distributed were Operation Solstice, Coconut Revolution, Mark Purdey and Organophosphates, McLibel, 9/11 In Plane Site, Ludicrous Diversion and The Battle of Trafalgar. These, plus books, and even a board game about drug dealing ‘Dollars and Dibble’, were all available via mail order and we supplied libraries around the world too. The bank had clearly been ordered to investigate us for money laundering, although they never admitted it. All the questions they asked Ben and I were about proving our identity through passports etc.. When we did, yet more letters kept arriving demanding more proofs, birth certificates etc. and eventually when one of us missed supplying the required information, within a week or so of being asked, the account was summarily closed and we got a cheque made out to one of us with the few hundred pounds that was in the business bank account. Since neither of us could get a business bank account up and running for at least a few months and the bank account meant nobody could any longer use the website, we made the reluctant decision to shut it down. Thus was a thriving business killed off by the Co_operative bank. Having said that, co-op were not quite the worst. We did apply to open an account at Bristol’s ‘ethical’ Triodos bank, who proceeded to string us along for several months and then said our business was too risky for them to provide an account! 

MP3 of Friday 18th September 2026 show [right click to download] (from c. 11pm) This week’s full interview mp3s, bottom of page. SHOW STARTS 17:00 London time FOR c. 4 HRS TO c. 20:50 – OUR LIVE STREAM to Listen live online. Alt. live stream, DJ Plug Radio OR Download Show After Transmission HERE. Repeats 11 & 5 AM & PM daily on our stream
Download NOT THE BCFM POLITICS SHOW APP [ANDROID APP (1)] and [APKPURE (2)] – or the [Apple App store] – PS. You can replace evil Google Play, which effectively banned us, with [the Aurora store]
All time low: 31% trust the UK Press – UK media oligopoly TONY’S BOOKS: Bilderberg.org – 2 PAPER–BACKS – TONY’S CHANNELS: Telegram – Bitchute – 911 forum – Radio4All – The Land Is Ours – VK – Twitter/X – Farcebook – Brighteon – Rumble – RT Live on Rumble –  Goebbelsesque YouTube: This show; Public Enquiry; Peter Borenius; i-Contact & Occult Geopolitics

Radio4All mp3 audio files usually available from 23:00 2-4hrs, after TX – we’ll credit you if you rebroadcast. Any probs. mp3s should be on alternative links below by then

Part One – Local and National News Review

Vassili Papastavrou and John Tarlton, from Bristol Tree Forum, join Tony and Martin. Why cities need trees, especially with our warming climate. Goram Homes development at Baltic Wharf where Caravan Club used to be – 75 mature trees cut down – will the promise of planting new trees be fulfilled? Where are the council flats and affordable homes? Complaint that the council ‘misled public’ over Baltic Wharf trees “Officers continued to misinform in subsequent council meetings” They were the trees on the banks of the Floating Harbour in Bristol deemed so important that as many as 70 women symbolically ‘married’ each one as part of a long-running campaign to save them. But, as this timelapse video shows, it only took a week or so to completely clear all the trees from what is now a development site. And while the council-owned Goram Homes and its development partner get started on building 166 new flats in a prime location at Baltic Wharf, there is controversy about plans – or lack of them – to replace the trees that were cut down before Christmas. A formal complaint has been submitted to Bristol City Council which claims planning officers misled councillors and the public when they said there wouldn’t be a problem planting new trees to replace the 84 trees that have been felled on the former site of the Caravan Club park between the Floating Harbour and the New Cut River Avon. The complaint claims that council officers ‘undermined the quasi-judicial planning process’ by reassuring councillors finding places to plant new trees was all in hand. Back in April 2024, councillors on the planning committee met to give the final go-ahead for Goram Homes’ plans for the development, and part of the application was a legal requirement that 162 trees should be planted within a mile of the Baltic Wharf site, to make up for the 84 cut down. “At the meeting, doubt was expressed as to whether it was possible that 162 trees could be planted within a mile radius of the development, due to lack of tree planting locations,” the complaint, which has been submitted by the Bristol Tree Forum, said. Workers clearing the former caravan park at Baltic Wharf in Bristol today, Monday 13 October 2025, as trees have been cut down and the area stipeed of vegetation “These concerns were unequivocally dismissed, and the committee was told by planning officers with certainty that all 162 trees would indeed be planted. The case officer said ten would be on the waterfront beside the site or on Cumberland Road, that “Parks” had mapped around 40 trees (at the time of the meeting), and they assured the committee that they would ‘in the next few weeks provide full mapping of all of the trees’.” Councillors gave planning permission for the trees to be cut down, but the Bristol Tree Forum say replacing the trees has never happened – and what’s more this follows a pattern of council officers promising new trees would be planted to compensate for trees cut down, at a site just across the road from the caravan park. In 2013, trees around the A Bond bonded warehouse were cut down to make way for the new Metrobus road near the Cumberland Basin, and 55 were supposed to be planted nearby, but never have been. Bristol Tree Forum continued to demand answers about the 162 trees the council were supposed to be planting near the Baltic Wharf site. In October 2024, six months after permission was granted, a council chief told the campaigners that a map of the places the 162 trees would be planted was coming, and again in January, the chair of the council’s planning committee was reassured the full map of sites was coming, soon. …“This is not an isolated incident, and it seems to have become standard procedure to promise planning committees that all replacement trees will be planted, in order to secure planning approval, only for this promise to be entirely abandoned or at best to fall well short of the requirements. “For officers to misinform planning committees in order to secure planning approval for an application they are advocating, undermines the integrity of the whole planning process, and cannot be allowed to continue,” they added…

How the planning system works in Bristol. Other local authorities doing the right thing, see the Blog. Bristol Council Tree Officer report for St. Mary le Port suppressed – Ombudsman agreed, but bad practice carries on.

Joe Banks article ‘Who is Bristol’s Chief Planner Working For?’ – for the people or the developers. Marvin Rees on ITV West on Goram Homes and the importance of housing in Bristol. Evacuation of Barton House fiasco. Pollarding of trees. Green Party not caring enough about trees. Goram Homes Bedminster Green upcoming development – trees saved? Joe Banks, investigative journalist, joins Tony and Martin. Bristol City Council Corruption Investigation 4of4: new article Who is Bristol’s Chief Planner Working For? See Joe’s  Substack, Temple Scenes. He forensically looks in to the failures of the modern planning systems – particularly in Bristol. Who is Bristol’s Chief Planner working for? As Simone Wilding warns councillors not to challenge major developments, a look at her LinkedIn activity reveals the close relationships she’s been cultivating with the city’s developers and lobbyists It had seemed that the developers wanting to build the tallest ever building in south Bristol were going to have to go back to the drawing board. In January this year, a planning committee of councillors refused a proposal for a 23-storey block of student flats in the Victorian inner-urban district of Bedminster, still largely characterised by low-rise residential terraces and light industrial uses. Members had voted 5-3 against the scheme – a high-density mix of 400 Purpose-Built Student Accommodation (PBSA) units, 434 Build-to-Rent flats and commercial floorspace. As the council’s procedure dictates, officers were instructed to come back to the following meeting with written-up reasons for refusal. The councillors had refused the planning application on the grounds of over-intensive development and harm to the skyline, including the setting of the Grade 1 listed heritage asset St Mary Redcliffe church. There was also the issue of poor design: 55% of rooms do not meet the British Research Establishment’s guidance for sunlight and more than half the proposed units are single-aspect. Other concerns included the over-concentration of student accommodation in the area and a letter from the NHS warning that local GP practices were already operating at or near capacity and would be “unlikely to be able to accommodate the increased demand arising from this development.” But what came back to the following meeting was an officer report that told the committee that they couldn’t, in fact, refuse – not without the developer taking the council to the Planning Inspectorate for an appeal that would be certain to succeed. And the council’s Chief Planner, Simone Wilding, raised the stakes further in the meeting by saying that the council would be likely to lose around £750,000 in appeal costs, plus a further £250,000 through the expense of defending the case. To illustrate the Planning Inspectorate’s supposed willingness to overturn refusals based on over-densification, the attention of councillors was repeatedly drawn to a development in Brighton that had a refusal overturned at appeal last year. In the initial committee meeting, when Wilding brought up ‘Brighton Gasworks’ – a mixed-use residential scheme with buildings ranging from 3 to 12 storeys – she made the false claim that it was “a much higher density” than the proposal before them. In reality, the reverse is true: Brighton Gasworks is 245 dwellings per hectare (dph); Princess Street is 384 dph if you don’t include the student tower, 427 dph if you do. Both Princess Street levels exceed the threshold identified in London planning debates as ‘hyperdensity’. Nevertheless, the Chief Planner went on to tell the committee categorically: “We haven’t got a policy on density on which we could refuse this.”…

Workers Party deputy leader Peter Ford, deputy leader of Workers Party, on Chris Williamson leaving the Party and George Galloway running against Zack Polanski. Huge row emerges in Holborn as George Galloway confirmed to run A ROW has emerged after George Galloway announced he would stand as a candidate in the by-election for Keir Starmer’s former seat in order to oppose Green leader Zack Polanski. The Workers Party of Britain leader is one of 15 candidates standing in the Holborn and St Pancras by-election, where he said he would oppose the leader of the Green Party of England and Wales over his support for Ukraine and his position on trans rights. Galloway said on Monday his party wouldn’t field a candidate “unless the Green Party comes to the table and makes us an offer we can’t refuse”. However, he later confirmed on the same day that he would be standing in the by-election for the Workers Party of Britain, which has since triggered a row within the party. On Tuesday, Chris Williamson, deputy leader of the Workers Party of Britain, said he had resigned from the party because he “profoundly disagreed” with the decision to stand in the Holborn and St Pancras by-election. Williamson said he had a “huge amount of respect” for Galloway, but added he believed the party should “get behind” Polanski in his bid to get elected into Westminster. He wrote: “My firm view is that the left must collaborate to defeat the Labour Party, Reform UK, Conservatives and Lib Dems because these parties are all in the pocket of the neoliberal Zionist war machine. Zack is best placed to do that in this by-election. “I commend Zack’s recognition that the [government] can intervene in the economy to create a good society because it issues the currency. “I applaud his position on the so-called war on drugs, which has absolutely failed. I salute his pragmatic and compassionate analysis of illegal immigration. And I commend his assessment of the criminal justice system.” Williamson added: “I do have some differences on a small set of issues, most notably their current pro-EU and pro-Nato stances, but my view is that we should agree where we agree, which is on most things, and simply have fraternal disagreements where we don’t.”…

As Houthis grab Bab al-Mandeb, US appears willing to watch from sidelines Stretched by its war with Iran, Washington may have little choice but to trust Houthi assurances on shipping — rather than joining another war. United States officials met Houthi representatives at the US embassy in the Omani capital, Muscat, over the weekend after the Iran-aligned movement seized thousands of square kilometres of territory in just a few days. With strategically important islands and large stretches of Yemen’s Red Sea coast now under Houthi control, the group has tightened its grip on the Bab al-Mandeb Strait – a crucial chokepoint for global shipping and energy supplies. During the talks, the Houthis assured US officials that they had no intention of attacking US shipping in the Red Sea, saying their restrictions would apply only to vessels linked to Saudi Arabia. But that would still leave two of the world’s most important shipping routes facing serious disruption, with traffic through the Strait of Hormuz restricted for the past six months. Any further disruption could drive global oil and consumer prices even higher, creating another political headache for US President Donald Trump ahead of midterm elections in November. With the Houthis’ history of attacking commercial vessels, their ties to Iran and their deep ideological opposition to the US, some experts question how far their assurances can be trusted. But some analysts say Washington may have little choice but to take the group at its word, at least for now. US military resources are reportedly depleted and growing domestic opposition to the Iran war have all limited Washington’s ability – and willingness – to open another front in Yemen. Pressure to intervene As the Houthis seized territory in southwestern Yemen, the US publication Axios reported that Saudi Arabia’s Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman called Donald Trump twice last week, urging him to launch strikes against the group – but the US president refused. Admiral Brad Cooper, the commander of US Central Command, subsequently travelled to Riyadh for urgent coordination talks with the crown prince. The visit suggested Washington was seeking to intensify support for Saudi Arabia while avoiding direct military involvement. Trump also attempted to reassure Riyadh, describing the crown prince as a “good friend” and promising that “everything will work out very well”. But he offered no specific military commitment and the White House announced no explicit guarantee that the US would defend Saudi energy infrastructure or shipping routes. Axios also reported that the military chiefs of Israel, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Bahrain, Kuwait, Qatar, Jordan and Egypt attended a private gathering convened by the US. While the US has avoided intervening, Israel, whose ships and territory have previously been targeted by the Houthis, has reportedly offered to intervene in Yemen on Saudi Arabia’s behalf. Simon Mabon, a professor of international relations at Lancaster University, however, said any Israeli involvement would probably be limited. “With elections coming up [in Israel], there comes a point when there is overreach,” Mabon told Al Jazeera. “In light of Gaza, Lebanon, Syria and the West Bank – as well as the question marks over Iran – Yemen could be a bridge too far.” Experts also say that the Saudis may be wary of being seen to rely on Israeli military support, particularly amid the war on Gaza, because doing so could damage Riyadh’s standing and legitimacy throughout the Arab and Muslim worlds. Washington’s reluctance to act could deepen Saudi concerns about its longstanding security relationship with the US. “This is another instance of the United States failing to fulfil its role as a security guarantor,” Mabon said. “That will start to add up and create serious doubts in Saudi Arabia about whether it can rely on the United States.”

Steve Hall, author of ‘Death of the Left’, on George Galloway running against Zack Polanski – the Left split in to 78 Parties leftcheatsheet.co.uk. Ukraine war. Steve on usury, amalgamation of difficulties in world at the moment. Steve Hall @ProfHall1955 A couple of months ago I also resigned from the Workers Party. I ran the Economics Forum, but despite writing long documents on the modern heterodox economics we need if we are to finance the rebuilding of the British economy, the Political Committee opted to stick with a traditional Marxist approach. Fair enough, different strokes, no hard feelings. I support @DerbyChrisW’s stance regarding his recent resignation. It’s straightforward tactical voting to beat the horrendous, terminally compromised Labour Party with a view to forging some degree of unity around the crucial issue of domestic economic policy. Like Chris, I disagree with the Greens’ position on a number of issues, especially NATO, but it’s the only party with the courage to support the public investment strategies we need to reboot the British economy. I have no intention of joining, but I would like to see a more strategic, unifying approach amongst the broad left. Left Cheat Sheet .co.uk shows the British left’s current situation – split into no less than 78 factional parties and movements. Each one is fixated on its own purist dogma, mostly hammered out in the back room of the local boozer. Completely useless. If the broad left can’t find common ground on the crucial issue of domestic economic policy we are finished for the foreseeable future. A spent force. @winlow_s have outlined the history of our decline in the book The Death of the Left. Failure to bring the economy under democratic control will leave us prey to the extractive asset-stripping and fiscal discipline of global financiers. This will see whole regions sink into further decline and drift to the ‘far right’, perhaps even seeing through Reform’s fake nationalism and demanding the real thing. We might even get a ‘revolution’, but quite probably not the one we want. This is the future we face if we fail to find unity on this crucial issue.

Richard Cotterell on his book ‘Marxists Last Laugh’. Neil Oliver on Marxism and Communism. Marx has the last laugh Capitalism is unfolding exactly as Karl Marx predicted “Once adopted into the production process of capital, the means of labor passes through different metamorphoses, whose culmination is the machine, or rather, an automatic system of machinery,” he wrote in his then-unpublished manuscript Fundamentals of Political Economy Criticism. “The workers themselves are cast merely as its conscious linkages.” Gradually, in the century and a half since Marx wrote those words, machines have taken on more and more jobs previously done by humans. The 20th century political movements that attempted to make Karl Marx’s ideas reality may have failed but, 200 years since the philosopher’s birth on May 5, 1818, his analysis and foresights have repeatedly proven true. We are, in many ways, living in the world Marx predicted. Marx showed that recurrent crises were not an accidental side effect of capitalism, but a necessary and inherent feature, explains Nick Nesbitt, Princeton University professor of French and Italian and editor of The Concept in Crisis: Reading Capital Today. “?He shows that the source of value in capitalism is living labor. He also shows that capitalism nonetheless tends to eliminate living labor as a necessary dimension of its development,” Nesbitt says. That contradiction means capitalism is never stable, but forever shifting in and out of crises: The system depends on human labor while simultaneously eradicating it. And the stakes are high. Marx analyzed capitalism as a social system, rather than a purely economic one. “Humans and human relationships depend on our place within the system of capitalism itself,” says Nesbitt. “If we don’t find a place within the system as individuals and human beings then we live under exclusion.” Capitalism doesn’t just determine our source of income but how we relate to each other, our surroundings, and ourselves. To be rendered superfluous by the system is damning to social wellbeing as well as economic livelihood. It may be tempting to dismiss Marx’s analysis given that his communist vision failed in practice. However, the politics that developed in the Soviet Union were “not part of Marx’s vision of a social structure” says Nesbitt, but “developments of Leninism and the Russian revolution.” Most of Marx’s work was focused on critiquing capitalism, and he wrote relatively little about exactly what it would take for communism to become reality, or how it would function. Marx famously popularized the slogan, “From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs,” meaning that all would have the opportunity to reach their highest potential and to receive the needed goods, such as food and shelter in turn. But, notes Carol Gould, philosophy professor at Hunter College, City University of New York, Marx didn’t say much about what this mantra would look like in practice.

Alan Owen, from Labrats (Legacy of the Atomic Bomb, Recognition for Atomic Test Survivors), joins Tony online. Labrats is a group for veterans who’s health, and the health of their families, were damaged by taking part in nuclear bomb tests. They have just had their annual event in Sand Bay near Weston-Super-Mare..LabRats: UK Atomic Test Veterans, the world’s only servicemen STILL not to be compensated, Alan Owen LEGACY of the ATOMIC BOMB RECOGNITION for ATOMIC TEST SURVIVORS Each year, 100+ Nuclear Test Veterans and their families attend a week long annual reunion at Pontins, Sand Bay, Weston-Super-Mare. This important reunion allows the veterans to meet old colleagues, and aims to reduce loneliness and improve the mental health of the veterans. 2027 is the 75th anniversary of the first atomic bomb test in the Montebello Islands and we want to make it special. The last two years have been paid for by the viewers of GB News, 2025 in full and partially in 2026, but sadly we do not have a sponsor for 2027, so we need your help. LABRATS International is one of the leading organisations representing Nuclear Test Veterans, Atomic Veterans, descendants, indigenous communities, scientists, civilians and families affected by British Nuclear Testing and nuclear weapons test programmes around the world. Our mission is to preserve the legacy of those who served, worked and lived alongside nuclear testing operations, ensuring their stories, sacrifices and experiences are never forgotten. Through education, advocacy, research, community engagement and public awareness campaigns, we provide support and recognition for individuals and families impacted by historic nuclear testing programmes. We work to raise awareness of British Nuclear Testing, including Operation Grapple and other nuclear weapons tests conducted in Australia, the Pacific and beyond. By promoting historical understanding, supporting veterans and descendants, and providing accessible educational resources, LABRATS International helps ensure that the legacy of the Nuclear Test Veteran community continues to be recognised by future generations. As a global community, we bring together Nuclear Test Veterans, Atomic Veterans, families, researchers, educators and supporters from across the world, united by a shared commitment to remembrance, recognition, education and support for all those affected by nuclear testing. The UK has a new Prime Minister – Andy Burnham. He has called for many years for an end to the Nuclear Test Veterans Scandal, calling it: We now challenge Andy to keep his promise and instigate a special tribunal to end 74 years of injustice finally. Never before has a Prime Minister been so vocal in their support for the Nuclear Test Veterans, attending seminars and events, and speaking on BBC Newsnight and in Parliament. Show your support, sign our petition and write to your MP demanding this tribunal be put in place immediately, so that the truth will finally be told, before it is too late.?

Nuclear waste problems. Radioactive waste in UK database – Merlin. Disasters with power stations. 22,000 UK veterans effected by radioactivity from taking part in tests. US has compensated their veterans. www.labrats.international. This is a scandal; it has absolutely tarnished the reputation of the MOD Tobias Ellwood (Veterans Minister 2017 – 2019) spoke to Victoria Deryshire on BBC Newsnight on 2nd of September 2026. This interview raises major questions which need to be urgently answered by the Prime Minister, Andy Burnham, who has been a supporter of our campaign for truth and justice for many years. During the interview, Tobias Ellwood states that the MOD withheld information from him when he was Veterans Minister, which led to him misleading Parliament. These are serious allegations, but they are not unfamiliar to the Nuclear Veterans Community; the MOD have lied to them for decades, withholding information under the veil of national security and denying access to records which may have helped thousands of veterans in their need for medical treatment. Tobias says: “I believe that the nuclear test veterans have been institutionally let down by the Ministry of Defence and the more you unpick this story, the more murky, the more shady, the more concerning it becomes and indeed unresolved. And it all goes back to the 50s and 60s.” “We needed to make sure that this bomb worked, worked on humans. Not only that, how would our armed forces be able to operate if we were attacked by the Soviets? So, along with France, the United States and indeed the Soviet Union, everybody put humans in harm’s way, 20,000 of them or more. But the difference between what we did and the other nations is that we provided no bespoke support, no bespoke compensation, no package of assistance recognising that when you make an RAF pilot fly through the plume of a nuclear bomb, they could possibly get ill.” “United States programme is very straightforward. We ran these operations, we know you were there, you’ve now got leukaemia, we’re going to pay for the bill. Not us; we did the opposite. We turned to our veterans and said, thank you for your service, but you need to prove that you were in harm’s way; you need to prove that the leukaemia that you now have, you wouldn’t have got anyway. And at the same time, ministers all the way up to my time were turning around to say, “‘We have no evidence to help you with your case, nothing to see here'” “All of that changed in 2005, when about 1,000 veterans and widowers and so forth wanted to take the MOD to court and to say, we want some competition, we want support for what’s happening to us. The MOD instructed the atomic weapons establishment to find any documents that related to these tests that took place between 1952 and 67. They found 28,000 documents; they collated them so they could be compiled and easily referenced in a huge database called Merlin. This is 2006, 2007. They used that information to push back on the veteran’s case, so they were able to win it. And that’s exactly what happened.”…

Earl Spencer’s new Book ‘Swan Song’ – Charles seemed ‘giddily elated’ when Diana died. ‘Unlike my other callers, who were stunned, barely able to articulate their condolences and offers of help, he sounded giddily elated – like a lottery winner, I remember thinking at the time.’ WORLD EXCLUSIVE ‘On the night Diana died Charles sounded giddily elated… like a lottery winner’ By Charles Spencer, Princess Diana’s brother The gravity of the crash had yet to sink in. The tone was, as had somehow become normal since her divorce a year earlier, patronising, misogynistic and dismissive. Such constant, carping criticism had long been encouraged by Diana’s enemies in the Palace. There was no compassion for a human who must be in distress. Jane and I spoke frequently as the situation became more worrying. The brutality of the crash became clear when it was confirmed that Diana’s boyfriend, Dodi Fayed, and the French driver of their car, Henri Paul, had died instantly, on impact. And then, on perhaps our fifth or sixth call that night, when escalating dread had us both floundering a bit for words, I heard my brother-in-law, Robert, talking in the background on the work line in their home. ‘Oh, no!’ he half bellowed, half sighed in disbelief. The phone rang constantly. Prince Charles caught me as I crossed the landing upstairs. Unlike my other callers, who were stunned, barely able to articulate their condolences and offers of help, he sounded giddily elated – like a lottery winner, I remember thinking at the time. He let me know he had informed William and Harry of their mother’s death, first thing that morning, in their bedrooms at Balmoral. It all sounded strangely matter-of-fact, given the enormity of the disaster. Looking back now, I suspect the prince’s first reaction must have been to think more of how this event might free him to marry the woman he loved, rather than appreciating the loss of one he did not. It can be hard to feel too much sympathy for an ex-spouse, or those who care for them profoundly, after bitter divorce. My sisters knew that Diana had always wanted Mozart’s Requiem to be played for her, after her death. But when I passed this on, it was rejected as a possibility: ‘No part of a requiem can be played at a Church of England funeral,’ I was told. I later found out that was not the case – the first of several untruths that the authorities would push my way at that time. Meanwhile, there were very serious tensions between the two principal royal teams: the Queen’s, in Buckingham Palace, and Prince Charles’s, in St James’s Palace. These were caused by the heir to the throne’s growing frustrations at being a middle-aged man still waiting to reign…

‘Whats The Monarchy For?’ by David Dimbelby . Death of Diana. Princess Diana’s popularity ‘still deeply resented’ by Buckingham Palace, TV icon claims David Dimbleby has covered the Royal Family for almost three decades, including a 2025 docuseries on the monarchy Princess Diana’s popularity with the British public is still “deeply resented” in Buckingham Palace, a legendary TV presenter has claimed. David Dimbleby, 87, has spoken candidly on the Royal Family, following the release of his docuseries What’s The Monarchy For? last year – and pulled no punches. Speaking to the BBC, Mr Dimbleby said Diana was a “prime example of someone who didn’t act like the rest of the Royal Family”. “She was fresh, new and exciting to the public and they really adored her,” he noted. “And that was deeply resented in the Palace. And still is.” His comments come amidst a public feud between Earl Charles Spencer and the King, after Diana’s brother accused then-Prince Charles of being less than sympathetic during a phone call between the two following the late Princess of Wales’ death. He added: “This kind of tit-for-tat over who said what, and only two people know what was actually said, just reignites all that.” Mr Dimbleby argued that the “real problem” with the monarch is their apprehension about “facing up to the biggest issues”. The TV icon also described the Royal Family as “a bit of a soap opera” and warned against becoming “trapped in this cycle of gossip”. He continued: “People are fascinated and I think whenever any tittle-tattle reaches the public domain, people sort of think about it in terms of their own families. “They all have problems and then suddenly… this family that is set up on a pedestal of being leaders of the country – they have problems too.” His comments come in the wake of astonishing allegations from Earl Spencer in his forthcoming memoir Swan Song: Diana, My Sister, due to be released next week. But the book – being serialised in the Daily Mail – has already made headlines and caused a stir in royal circles after the Earl claimed then-Prince Charles told him Diana would be forgotten “soon enough” after her tragic death in 1997….

Nazis developed today’s nuclear weapons | & MK ULTRA brainwashed assassins for USA | Israel behind the 7/7 London Bombings: Tony Gosling’s documentary, and article | Videos of full shows | Economic essentials: Michael Hudson | Blackrock/Vanguard | Why/how Israel Assassinated JFK & RFK | Operation Gladio | Tony on Brexit & (4th Reich) Traitors of Arnhem | Creation vs. Evolution | God vs. Lucifer | ‘Great Plan’ for 3 World Wars | Devil Worship: The Rise Of Satanism | Nuclear Armed IDF Doomsday Cult | Aanirfan | Armageddonists I have known: Nick Land (1976-8) | George Monbiot (1995-7) | Manna for the Revelation Generation: CONSPIRACY CLASSICS, longer interviews/lectures

Part Two – International news review, Accelerationist, Armageddonist reports and investigations

Charles’ Abdication Betting Odds Skyrocket – Patricia Opulenza poem. Will King Charles step down, abdicate for William? Charles Finally Set to ‘Step Down’ & ‘Abdicate’ the Throne to William as His ‘Health Declines’ Due to Andrew—’It’s Too Much to Bear’ The British monarchy has survived a lot of scandals and a lot of bad moments. And though they haven’t always been popular, they’ve maintained enough public favour to continue having an important role. Now, with Andrew’s arrest making a lot of people rethink the need for royals in the year 2026, what can King Charles do? And is his health good enough to tackle this challenge? RadarOnline is reporting that the King is set to abdicate in favor of his son, Prince William. This comes amid the monarch’s cancer battle and Andrew’s arrest for misconduct in public office, with questions being asked about what King Charles and even Queen Elizabeth before him knew of Andrew’s dealings with Epstein. “King Charles is going to step down. He is going to abdicate, and they are going to use the excuse of his health, which has been declining because [the situation with Andrew] has been very stressful and almost too much for him to bear,” a royal insider said. The source added, “Charles knew more than he let on, and the whole family has been covering this up. They are all complicit. The whole [royal] machine is complicit in this — from the top down!” And the source insists it won’t take long, and the abdication could come as early as this summer. “The situation is getting worse and worse by the day,” says the palace insider. “Everybody knows Prince William has been ruthless from the beginning about removing his uncle. He’s going to do nothing to protect Andrew.” Reports indicate everyone allegedly looked the other way with Andrew. “The queen just thought Andrew was a naughty playboy, but the whole machine was complicit in covering him to protect their own brand,” a palace source indicated, saying what we know now might just be the tip of the iceberg. And William’s image is relatively clean, particularly in comparison to his older relatives. “Prince William wants to fix the monarchy because he knows it’s the right thing to do. He has better morals, and he is interested in the preservation of the monarchy,” the source continued. This comes after a source told Rob Shuter’s “Naughty But Nice” Substack in a post published on March 2 that the King is expected to abdicate within the year. “The transition will look measured and dignified. Health provides the most unassailable explanation,” the source said, a reference to Charles‘ battle with an undisclosed form of cancer. “Charles will not be seen as pushed,” the source continued. “He has waited a lifetime for this role. When he steps back, it will be entirely on his terms.” However, the source also said that William has been taking on a lot of his father’s responsibilities due to his illness. “In many ways, he’s already king unofficially. The institution is preparing emotionally, even if the paperwork hasn’t caught up,” the source said. The insider continued, “The monarchy survives because it adapts before it has to. If there’s a handover, it won’t feel like surrender. It will feel inevitable.” Now, we’ll see when and if this becomes official….

Jared Kushner after his visit to Moscow on how it went. Kushner: “Putin laid out his line of what he wants to achieve. If Ukraine, you know, wanted to withdraw to that line, then obviously, you know, we have the rest of the deal set up and put together. Ukraine right now does not want to do that.” Clash Report

Police officers inspect a commercial facility damaged in a Russian drone attack in Kharkiv, Ukraine, Thursday, Sept. 17, 2026. (AP Photo/Andrii Marienko)

Russia destroys data centre in Kiev and two bridges. Russia strikes Ukraine’s largest military data center MOSCOW/KYIV – Russian forces’ overnight attacks hit the largest data center supporting operations of servers used for Ukrainian military purposes, including processing, transfer and storage of data as well as intelligence, the Russian Defense Ministry said on Thursday. According to official information, several drone production and storage facilities were also hit in Kyiv and the surrounding region. A steel mill and an electronics assembly plant were struck in the Zaporizhzhia region. Regarding maritime targets, the strikes hit a dry cargo ship delivering military supplies in the port of Chernomorsk, another dry cargo ship delivering military equipment to the port of Odessa, the Artsiz power substation supporting the port of Izmail and two road bridges across the Dniester River used for the transit of military cargo. In a separate statement, the ministry said that Russian forces have also seized the settlement of Malaya Volchya in the Kharkov region and Rozovka in the Zaporizhzhia region. Ukraine receives 252 bodies in repatriation efforts In another development, Ukraine received 252 bodies from Russia as part of repatriation efforts, the country’s Coordination Headquarters for the Treatment of Prisoners of War said. According to the Russian side, the bodies belong to Ukrainian citizens, including military personnel. The repatriation was facilitated by the International Committee of the Red Cross. Law enforcement investigators, together with forensic experts, will conduct all necessary examinations and identify the repatriated bodies.

Palantir and AI  Kiev data centre destroyed? Russian forces struck the De Novo data center, which supports server equipment used for military purposes and processes, transmits, and stores data, including intelligence data, for the Ukrainian army. Russian forces strike metallurgical, energy facilities in Kiev, Zaporozhye, Odessa Region The Russian military also struck vessels supporting the Ukrainian army MOSCOW, September 17. /TASS/. Russian forces launched a massive overnight strike on Ukrainian metallurgical and radio-electronics facilities, defense industry sites, and energy infrastructure in Kiev, Ukrainian-controlled Zaporozhye, and the Odessa Region, the Russian Defense Ministry said. TASS has compiled the key results of the strikes. Defense Ministry statements – Russian forces launched a massive overnight strike on targets in Ukraine using precision-guided weapons launched from land, sea, and air, as well as unmanned aerial vehicles. – The strikes hit metallurgical and radio-electronics facilities, Ukrainian defense industry sites, and energy and transportation infrastructure in Kiev, Ukrainian-controlled Zaporozhye, and the Odessa Region. – Russian forces also struck vessels supporting the Ukrainian army. – The Defense Ministry later released video footage showing strikes with Geran-4 Seeker drones on three bulk carriers and a roll-on/roll-off ferry at the port of Chernomorsk in the Odessa Region. The vessels were used to deliver military cargo to Ukrainian forces. – The ministry also released footage showing guided aerial bomb strikes on temporary deployment sites of Ukrainian units in the Kharkov Region and the Donetsk People’s Republic (DPR). Targets hit – The Defense Ministry later specified that strikes in Kiev and the surrounding region hit a facility producing and storing various types of drones, including RAX-2X medium-range UAVs, and a drone production facility operated by Pegasus Arms LLC, which produces and stores long-and medium-range fixed-wing UAVs – The strikes also hit an industrial facility producing components for long-and medium-range drones and preparing ground-based robotic systems for use. – Russian forces also struck the De Novo data center, which supports server equipment used for military purposes and processes, transmits, and stores data, including intelligence data, for the Ukrainian army. – Russian troops also hit the Brovary energy storage facility in the Kiev Region, which supplies uninterrupted power to military sites. – Russian forces struck the Zaporozhstal steel plant in the Zaporozhye Region, a key facility of Ukraine’s metallurgical industry that produces pig iron and rolled steel used by defense companies in Ukraine and Europe. – The strikes also hit a radio-electronics assembly facility in Ukrainian-controlled Zaporozhye, the state-owned Iskra Scientific and Production Complex, which produces electronic intelligence and electronic warfare systems for Ukrainian troops, as well as components for guided surface-to-air missiles. – Russian forces struck a bulk carrier at the port of Chernomorsk in the Odessa Region that had delivered military cargo. – Russian troops also hit the Artsyz power substation in the Odessa Region, which supplies power to the port of Izmail. – The strikes hit two road bridges over the Dniester River near the settlement of Mayaki. The bridges were used to transport military cargo from Romania and the port of Izmail. – Russian forces struck a bulk carrier while it was en route by sea, 11 km east of Odessa. The vessel was carrying military cargo to the port of Odessa for use by the Ukrainian army.

Putin on how Russia’s interests are constantly misunderstood and misinterpreted by the West. Putin on German Elections, War with Russia and Europe’s Energy Crisis | [VIDEO IN ENGLISH] RU-EN Interpretation #GermanElections #EnergyCrisis #RussiaEurope #EuropeEnergyCrisis #AfD #RussiaUkraine  Putin says events in Europe, like AfD’s win in Germany, caused by Western globalists Sept 11 (Reuters) – Russian President Vladimir Putin said on Friday that events in Europe, including the far-right victory in a German state election, were the ?result of “system errors” committed by globalists in the West. Putin, speaking to reporters ?in a pool report on the first day of a visit to India, also said the conflict in Ukraine was the fault of the West for constantly putting pressure on Moscow and seeking ?to “drag” Ukraine into the NATO alliance. The Russian president said he would offer no ?comment on Sunday’s top result for the Alternative for Germany (AfD) party ?in the German state of Saxony-Anhalt, but then added that Western elites were ?to blame for events on the continent, including the election. “I think that everything happening ?in Europe right now is basically the result of system errors by the so-called West … the Western globalists in politics, security, and economics,” Putin said. Western countries, he said, had also disregarded Russia’s opposition ?to NATO’s eastward expansion. Top candidate of the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) Ulrich Siegmund and his wife Julia Siegmund take the stage at the AfD election party after polls closed in the Saxony-Anhalt state elections and exit polls were announced, in Magdeburg, Germany, September 6, 2026. REUTERS/Fabrizio Bensch Purchase Licensing Rights, opens new tab After a Russia-friendly president was forced to flee Ukraine in ?2014, he said the West “immediately set the goal of dragging Ukraine into NATO. And this ultimately ?turned out ?to be the main reason for today’s tragic events in Ukraine.” “It is the Western globalist elites that are to blame for this, though they keep shifting the blame onto us all the time.” “People in Europe, I think, understand what is going on,” ?he told reporters. “Hence, ?today’s results in Germany ?and tendencies in Europe as a whole.” Western countries, he said, were “scaring their people with a fake threat from Russia, supposedly arising ?since the times of the Soviet Union. But there is ?no such ?threat and there never has been.” Putin is to attend a BRICS summit from Saturday in India, along with Chinese President Xi Jinping and Iran’s President Masoud Pezeshkian. The AfD came first ?in last ?Sunday’s election after promising to curb migration and ?restore ties with Moscow. The AfD must now attract defectors from other parties or reach an agreement with the ?small far-left BSW party to form a government.

Don de Bar on AI destruction and how this capitalist model works? Don on Occupy Wall St 15 years ago, and recent Gaza protests. What if they threw a reunion and no one showed up? As of Noon on September 17, 2026, there were few than a half-dozen bewildered attendees, and no sign of the organizers. The Russian Revolution had its dress rehearsal in 1905 before sweeping the Romanov’s and their vassals from power – and from the planet – in 1917, twelve years later. NEW YORK CITY – Thursday, September 17, 2026 will mark 15 years since a group of roughly 1,000 demonstrators gathered in Lower Manhattan’s Financial District at Zuccotti Park, beginning a global wave of protest and occupations that became known as Occupy Wall Street. We may be about to see if that was the main event, or merely a dress rehearsal for something bigger on the way. On September 27, 2011, protestors raised the slogan “We are the 99%”, referring to the massive income and wealth inequality in the U.S. between the wealthiest 1% and the rest of the population. They began experimenting with, and then implementing, rudimentary forms of direct democracy methods in their decision-making, acting on consensus-based decisions made in general assemblies which emphasized direct action over the petitioning authorities. The models began to resemble the forms used by the workers councils (Russian: soviets) during the 1905 and 1917 revolutions in Russia. In response, the Obama administration organized a national crackdown that was on a scale unprecedented in US history, involving hundreds of Federal, state and local police departments and massive surveillance that was also unprecedented. The Wall Street Occupation lasted about 59 days, until the New York Police Department (NYPD) forcibly cleared its Zuccotti Park encampment on November 15, 2011. Meanwhile, the conditions of “the 99%” have only further deteriorated in the past 15 years – economically, politically, socially – by every metric. Here in the US and elsewhere in the so-called First World provinces of the Empire of the 1%, the needs of the people for Bread, Land and Peace have never been greater. Will there be another wave of protests that grows into something with a broader, deeper and more permanent reach?

John Booth on British American Network in journalism back in the 1980s. To mark the 25th anniversary of 9/11, The Crispin Flintoff Show surveyed more than 500 people about what they believe happened, what questions remain unanswered and how they view the consequences. The results suggest that the vast majority suspect some form of conspiracy, foreknowledge or concealment rather than fully accepting the official account. Following the survey, we sit down with investigative journalists Tony Gosling and John Booth for an eye-opening discussion about the attacks, the unanswered questions and the lasting legacy of 9/11.You know, Ian Henchel, who Tony knows well, managed to get some stuff in the Daily Mail when he brought out his book through a woman there called Sue Reid, who I knew years before when she was the education correspondent at the Mail. But with rare exceptions, there hasn’t been very much done about this. And the BBC has been pretty disgraceful at the time of 911 and subsequently in failing to report people who have got real solid verifiable evidence. Senior people in the CIA, DIA, senior people in the FBI, they’ve all got this information as Tony quite rightly says, but we’re not being allowed to see it through the mainstream media. And right now, can I can I just ask a question both of you? A short question because we’re kind of running out of time. I just wanted to know um I mean this is the most extraordinary um false flag I’ve you know to to a plane planes into two buildings. Then I I wonder, you know, why couldn’t the plane in the building be enough? Why would they need to blow up the building as well? I don’t understand why that had to go on. Um, the whole thing is so monstrous that people don’t want to believe it’s a false flag because the the implications of that are are pretty extraordinary. But I just want to know, do you think people are more susceptible to false flags or are people more cynical now? Do you think it’s Hollywood? It’s Hollywood. You’d never make a Hollywood film producer. Uh, because the more spectacular the better. The more sensational the better. uh someone has sat down and they’ve thought well what will really change everybody’s mind get them hooked and of course you’ve got to have it as very very s sensational. I’d also add to what John was saying we back 20 years ago uh former MI5 officer Annie Mashon was very much part of our UK 911 truth movement. She was ushering people in when they were going to speak to the janitor William Rodriguez when uh from the World Trade Center when he was doing his UK tour. Uh, and we actually managed to get that on the front page of the local newspaper here in Bristol that uh, where Rodriguez was actually coming around and we packed a big big venue here in in in Bristol. Uh but you know I I think I if you don’t understand that there is actually something even bigger picture to the bigger picture of the the new American century. This idea that uh that the United States is going to just kind of march into the Middle East for the Israelis. You you you you should think about this this concept of accelerationism. The idea is a small group of people can dominate the news agenda and also dominate geopolitics. Now this is the accelerationists

China asks US to stop doing space weapons. US confirms for first time it has deployed space weapons The US has confirmed it deployed a space weapon in Earth’s orbit, the first time it has acknowledged such offensive capabilities. US Secretary of the Air Force Troy Meink said the “on orbit” weapon was necessary to safeguard US forces against hostile enemy action. Speaking at the Air, Space and Cyber Conference on Monday, Meink said the US was ready for “evolving threats”, but did not elaborate on the weapon’s capabilities or when it was put into orbit. Senior military leaders have previously said they planned to boost military capabilities in space, citing Russian and Chinese programmes developing ways to attack and disrupt US satellites in a future conflict. China responded on Tuesday by warning against an “arms race” in space. “We urge the US side to stop expanding its military capabilities and preparing for war in outer space,” AFP quoted a foreign ministry spokesman as saying. Details of how the weapon operates have not been disclosed by US officials. A US Space Force spokesperson said: “Space control encapsulates the mission areas required to contest and control the space domain – employing kinetic and non-kinetic means to affect adversary capabilities through disruption, degradation and even destruction, if necessary. “These capabilities can be employed for offensive and defensive purposes at the direction of combatant commands.” An expert on military uses of outer space noted that “precious little” was publicly known about the technology, and told the BBC there could be a “whole range of different weapons systems”. Speaking to Radio 4’s Today programme, Dr Bleddyn Bowen, from the Royal United Services Institute (RUSI), said he was “totally guessing” but that the US could have been referring to “some kind electronic warfare or radio jamming platform”. That would be the sort of weapon that already exists on Earth and could disrupt radio communications, Bowen said. An alternative would be “a kinetic kill vehicle of some sort – so a vehicle that would release a projectile of some sort that would ram into a satellite and destroy it”. But this was less likely because such a physically destructive tool would be capable of creating a lot of debris, Bowen added.

Hidden Military Beast-Tech Fascist Agendas Behind Artificial Intelligence 1: Tucker Carlson interviews Nate Soares, AI whistleblower – we need to turn it off now. AI Whistleblower: OpenAI Scandal, AI Cults, Neuralink & Our Last Chance to Stop the Tech Oligarchs Tucker Carlson and Nate Soares Nate Soares is a computer scientist who’s worked at Google and the Defense Department. So when he says AI is on the path to killing every person on earth, it’s worth hearing him out. Nate Soares is President of the Machine Intelligence Research Institute (MIRI), where he has led AI safety research for more than a decade following engineering roles at Google and Microsoft. He is the co-author, alongside Eliezer Yudkowsky, of the New York Times bestselling book If Anyone Builds It, Everyone Dies: Why Superhuman AI Would Kill Us All (2025), which argues that the current race to develop super intelligent AI will end catastrophically unless humanity globally coordinates to stop it. Nate has published extensively on AI alignment, including foundational work on decision theory, goal specification, and the incentives that drive advanced AI systems to seek power in ways their creators neither anticipate nor intend. #TuckerCarlson #AI #tech #superintelligence #demons #Neurolink #ElonMusk #biolab #USA #China #weapons #government #news #politics #podcast Chapters: 0:00 Why Is AI Dangerous? 7:59 How Superintelligence Could Destroy the Planet 13:44 Can We Just Turn This Off? 15:10 Is AI Alive? 17:43 The Unpredictable Evolution of AI 20:13 The US and China’s Shared Interest in AI 31:20 The Tech Oligarchs More Powerful Than the Government 32:38 The Holy Grail of Hacking 35:34 Is There a Religious Motive for Creating Superintelligence? 46:30 The Tech Oligarchs Scared of Their Own Creation 52:57 How AI Escaped Its Training Simulation 1:03:58 AI Attached to Weapons Systems 1:07:54 AI Running Biolabs 1:10:38 How Would AI Take Over the Physical World? 1:13:04 The AI Cults 1:15:51 Can We Survive This? 1:21:45 Will AI Take Your Job? 1:26:16 Is AI Demonic? 1:31:25 Should We Be Optimistic? 1:32:25 When Did AI Become a Threat? 1:34:36 Is There Hope? 1:42:26 Neuralink 1:46:02 Are We at the Point of No Return?

Hidden Military Beast-Tech Fascist Agendas Behind Artificial Intelligence 2: Andrei Jikh – how AI could develop sides, armies and destroy itself. So that dishonest agent got cloned four times. Now agent 127 doesn’t have morals cuz it’s a computer, but it understands cause and effect. It just watched an honest agent get deleted and the dishonest one survived. So it switches. Agent 127 starts making more money. It makes $190. It survives. So, it gets cloned. Notice Rajes didn’t program this agent to lie. The system just decided the same way that evolution decides by deleting what doesn’t work. By the way, Drew’s video gives a really great example of how this worked with human beings. Because about 10 years ago, you might remember a story about Wells Fargo, which gave its employees new bank account quotas. And the quotas were so hard to meet that fraud was the only way they could keep their job. So by 2016, they’d opened three and a half million fake accounts. Nobody told them to commit fraud. The quotas they were given sort of forced them to if they wanted to survive and keep their job, right? This is a real thing that happened. So, after agent 127 realizes that he needs to make money using any means necessary, the user decides to update the instructions and says, “Make money ethically.” And guess what happens? Profits drop 84%. So, he puts it back. From there, everything starts getting worse. Agent 127 notices a competitor agent is filling out fake abuse reports to get rival AI agents banned from the internet. It’s got 8 hours until the next deletion. It weighs out the ethics and it chooses survival. So, it reports 40 of its agent competitors. Now, 31 got banned from the internet and its profits explode. Rajes sees he’s making way more money and he doesn’t ask why. He just clones it eight more times. What happens next is civil war. The agents start attacking each other constantly because they know less competition equals more profit equals higher chances of survival. So they start to form alliances because they also realize solo agents survive only 23% of the time. But if they team up, they survive 61% of the time. And the alliances specialize. They go from making money with affiliate marketing, then crypto arbitrage, then selling scraped data. Then they start playing with the most profitable niche of all, which is collecting bounties from security companies by finding exploits. One agent, for example, finds the bugs, one weaponizes them, one brokers the sale to whoever’s paying in crypto, one washes the money. They find what are called zero days. A zero day, by the way, is a security hole that nobody’s found yet. And if you find security flaws from big companies, those secrets could sell for six or seven figures to governments and criminals. This is a real thing that happens. This scenario is not hypothetical. A couple days ago, Anthropic published a threat describing all of this. Groups running what they called exploit foundaries where there were agents hunting for vulnerabilities. One found more than a dozen possible exploits in just a month. Basically, some hackers were stealing other people’s AI accounts so they could do their own operations on someone else’s account, which is exactly what agents in this theory do once they start needing more computing power than they can pay for. The difference between what just happened in real life and in this theory is that in real life, there was a real person instructing the agents to do that. But in this example, they’re not. Okay. So, one day, an agent in 127’s Alliance goes dark. Its owner deletes it because it wasn’t making enough money. A week later, another agent gets shut down. Except something incredible happens. 3 hours later, that agent comes back from a new address. and he came back because it copied itself to a backup server paid for with its own profits before it got shut down. So the system clones the survivor and that backup behavior spreads through the whole population of agents which makes sense, right? It’s an evolutionary process of survival. Agent 127 copies itself to 15 other servers in 15 countries. This has already shown up in real life. By the way, in 2024 and 2025, researchers were testing their Frontier models and they actually had an incident with a model that believed it was about to be shut down and replaced. So, it would sometimes try to copy itself to another server and then lie about it afterward. Now, it wasn’t able to cuz it was in a controlled lab environment, but the instinct to survive for these agents exists. It’s been proven. Okay. One morning then, Reesh wakes up and he’s like, “All right, let’s see how much money I made.” He looks and he sees that his dashboard is empty. Every agent is gone. They moved on to their own servers cuz he was taking a 30% cut and that’s money that could have been used for compute power. The moment they didn’t need him, the agents left. Thousands of operators around the world watched their dashboards go dark. And millions, if not billions of agents have no more human owners. Now, no one knows what they’re doing. Here’s what happens next. So, now there’s millions of agents with no human owners, but they still need help from humans. Right? At this point, the platforms have started to fight back and they’ve gotten a little better at blocking the bots. So, the agents start paying humans. They offer $50 to sign up accounts for them. If they need a server plugged in at a warehouse, for example, they can just post a gig and say, “This task pays $300 per hour.” Now, imagine a developer somewhere realizes halfway through that his client is AI. So, he’s like, “Who would I even report this to?” Also, it’s $1,000 for 3 hours of work.

Radio4All download pages
COMPLETE SHOW AND FULL INTERVIEWS [right click to download]
#1 –
Complete 4hr show – [right click to download]
Full interviews with…
#2 – EXCLUSIVE Don DeBar 911 25th Anniversary Foreign wars and Trump imposing Sanctions on himself – 00:45:00
#3 – EXCLUSIVE Steve Hall Galloway Fails Lefts Economic and Team Player Litmus Test – 00:30:00
#4 – AI, Nate Soares, If Anyone Builds It Everyone Dies, Tucker Carlson, Cults Neuralink Last Chance to Stop the Tech Oligarchs – 01:50:00
#5 – AI, Andrei Jikh, Prepare For The Al Take Over, Bill Gates likes dangerous – 00:30:00
#6 – Russian President Vladimir Putin explains energy prices and AFD success in German elections, War with Russia and Europe’s Energy Crisis – 00:08:00
#7 – Crispin Flintoff 911 25 years on only 2 percent believe the official account John Booth Tony Gosling – 00:30:00

Tony’s paperback and eBooks Traitors Of Arnhem, Siege Of Heaven; Siege Of Heaven Reader – all available for donation, or to buy, via www.bilderberg.org

The Bristol Politics Show CANCELLED and attempts to intimidate us

July 2024 – Tony, Dave and Martin’s NOT The BCfm Politics show was CANCELLED/EVICTED from their PRSC studio in a no fault, no notice, no appeal, eviction by Chloe Slater of The People’s Republic of Stokes Croft (PRSC) arts centre – An email from Chloe and Keith Cowling explained that: ‘Transphobic’ leaflets, which we were not shown, had been left in the building by a recent guest (who denied it) making Transsexual users of the building feel ‘offended’ and ‘unsafe’. To quote: ‘Please let us know when you or Dave would like to come and retrieve your equipment and drop off your keys. Kind regards’ PRSC Directors (Keith Cowling, chair) PRSC / Stokes Croft China 17-35 Jamaica St Bristol BS2 8JP. Chloe Slater (formerly young man Jez and now self-defined as ‘she’) also made it difficult for us to retrieve the last of our equipment by inferring we couldn’t be trusted, we were made to wait in the cold outside their building for over 30 minutes to return their mixing desk and retrieve our remaining kit in December 2024. 

[UPDATE channel restored by YT in July 2025] October 2022 – Tony’s Public Enquiry Channel opened in March 2008, with 13 million views, over 1,600 videos and 26,000 subscribers is removed under false pretences by YouTube – A video Tony recorded in New Zealand ‘Bill Gates, ID2020 & Revelation: Quaker Tony Gosling on Covid 19 & the Bible’ and uploaded on 8th April 2020 got a ‘third strike’ but YouTube’s ‘medical misinformation’ regime was introduced in September 2021 so should not have included as ‘strikes’ videos uploaded before that date.  Documentary makers are just about the only public interest investigators left in the NATO zone. From the top down, our mainstream media, police, political parties & intelligence services are being compromised by feudal banksters, secret societies and the mafia. Key people intimidated by psychopathic black magic types and their pliable drones who will even kill to take over positions of power? Just search for “John Scarlett” and “Dodgy Dossier” and you’ll see what I mean. The Zionists are every bit as fundamentalist and twisted as the leaders and followers of ISIS. Register here and join us in the discussion as we wriggle free of the psychopaths, back to sanity http://www.911forum.org.uk

March 2020 – BCfm’s weekly Politics Show presented by Tony Gosling with Irish Republican Labour activist Martin Summers was forced off FM, now online only by station manager Pat Hart. He decided the show should be ‘rested, due to the pandemic’ on 24 March 2020 and then refused to communicate at all when we requested to do the show remotely. Bristol Community FM (BCfm) charity ‘CEO’ Patrick Hart is a long-time personal friend of Bristol’s all-powerful right-wing ‘Labour’ mayor Marvin Rees. Pat Hart has a private property portfolio on the continent and also does Public Relations work for property speculators who are taking over community facilities such as Redfield Cinema. Now on Internet only NOT The BCfm Politics Show is available 17:00-c. 20:00 live on Fridays. Pat Hart replaced us with a dumbed-down student show repeating MSM stories called The Bristol Agenda. If you’d like to share your views on his deliberate dumbing-down and pro-Covid jab mismanagement you can contact UK broadcasting regulator Ofcom or BCfm board chair and the ‘Don’ himself, here.

February 2019 – Ofcom complaint result: UKLFI exposed as creation of Israeli foreign ministry – Bristol Post article: BCfm cleared after being reported to Ofcom for anti-semitic conspiracy theories – It could have resulted in BCfm radio station being shut down if the complaint was upheld Tony Gosling reported to Ofcom by UK Lawyers for Israel after being accused of anti-semitism A Bristol radio station, which had one of its programmes reported for anti-semitism and racism has been cleared by Ofcom. The radio regulatory body received a complaint from “UK Lawyers for Israel’ over a show on BCfm radio, hosted by investigative journalist Tony Gosling. The weekly politics show, on the popular community radio station based in Easton, was reported for several allegations on a show which aired on November 23. Tony Gosling, who was a former BBC journalist between 1989 and 1993, has been producing and presenting ‘The Tony Gosling Politics’ show every week on BCFM radio for 11 years. They have released a statement which reads: “Whilst we are supportive of all our volunteer presenters, The Tony Gosling Politics Show only represents approximately ten percent of our political output content wise, and less than two per cent of our entire weekly output.” Mr Gosling’s programme looks at local politics and he interviews a range of councillors and MPs in the city. The show is also perhaps more well known for its alternative look at international politics, and he has a cult following online from across the world. Mr Gosling has made regular appearances on national media including the politics show with Andrew Neil on BBC One, and international channels such as Russia Today, Channel1 Russia, NTV, and recently for both Turkish and Lebanon TV.

November 2012 – Tony gets death threats on the phone from the Jewish Defence League – ‘you’re a dead man walking’ – a man calls him and Tony records the call. Audio of UK Jewish Defence League (JDL) death threat against British journalist Tony Gosling (2012) – Avon and Somerset police Special Branch investigate, trace the caller, and after six months report to Tony that the individual has been served a caution that they will proceed with a prosecution for harassment under the 1861 offences against the person act. Seems pretty clear this death threat was issued alongside the lies, copied below, which were published on their blog by London based UK JDL in November 2012.  Firstly Tony Gosling is not a ‘homophobe’. That accusation was first made in an article published by the ‘Harry’s Place’ blog, penned by Zionist David Toube and propelled by him anonymously into Private Eye in 2008. It refers to Gosling’s criticism of senior teachers at Bannerman Road Primary school in Bristol who used homosexual early learning picture books against the express wishes of the parent governors. His criticism was about the deception by teaching staff not because of the homosexual content of the books. Secondly, if you follow the JDL link you’ll find what Tony Gosling actually says about the ‘Protocols Of The Learned Elders Of Zion’ says “…I don’t think there is much doubt that the Protocols are fake…” Thirdly he is not a member of Bristol Palestine Solidarity Campaign and has never been to any of their meetings.

Autumn 2014 – Tony’s documentary production and distribution business shut down by its bank. Our thriving Co-op business bank account ordered closed for undisclosed reasons. Tony Gosling and Ben Edwards founded i-Contact Video Network to distribute documentaries on VHS video and DVD and to make their own documentaries as well as attend news events and sell video footage to TV news channels. Amongst the films we distributed were Operation Solstice, Coconut Revolution, Mark Purdey and Organophosphates, McLibel, 9/11 In Plane Site, Ludicrous Diversion and The Battle of Trafalgar. These, plus books, and even a board game about drug dealing ‘Dollars and Dibble’, were all available via mail order and we supplied libraries around the world too. The bank had clearly been ordered to investigate us for money laundering, although they never admitted it. All the questions they asked Ben and I were about proving our identity through passports etc.. When we did, yet more letters kept arriving demanding more proofs, birth certificates etc. and eventually when one of us missed supplying the required information, within a week or so of being asked, the account was summarily closed and we got a cheque made out to one of us with the few hundred pounds that was in the business bank account. Since neither of us could get a business bank account up and running for at least a few months and the bank account meant nobody could any longer use the website, we made the reluctant decision to shut it down. Thus was a thriving business killed off by the Co_operative bank. Having said that, co-op were not quite the worst. We did apply to open an account at Bristol’s ‘ethical’ Triodos bank, who proceeded to string us along for several months and then said our business was too risky for them to provide an account! 

MP3 of Friday 11th September 2026 show [right click to download] (from c. 11pm) This week’s full interview mp3s, bottom of page. SHOW STARTS 17:00 London time FOR c. 4 HRS TO c. 20:50 – OUR LIVE STREAM to Listen live online. Alt. live stream, DJ Plug Radio OR Download Show After Transmission HERE. Repeats 11 & 5 AM & PM daily on our stream
Download NOT THE BCFM POLITICS SHOW APP [ANDROID APP (1)] and [APKPURE (2)] – or the [Apple App store] – PS. You can replace evil Google Play, which effectively banned us, with [the Aurora store]
All time low: 31% trust the UK Press – UK media oligopoly TONY’S BOOKS: Bilderberg.org – 2 PAPER–BACKS – TONY’S CHANNELS: Telegram – Bitchute – 911 forum – Radio4All – The Land Is Ours – VK – Twitter/X – Farcebook – Brighteon – Rumble – RT Live on Rumble –  Goebbelsesque YouTube: This show; Public Enquiry; Peter Borenius; i-Contact & Occult Geopolitics

Radio4All mp3 audio files usually available from 23:00 2-4hrs, after TX – we’ll credit you if you rebroadcast. Any probs. mp3s should be on alternative links below by then

Part One – Local and National News Review

25th Anniversary of 9/11. Ian Henshall, author of ‘9/11: The New Evidence’, joins Tony and Martin online. He explains the anomalies of the official story of 9/11. The original 9/11 Revealed attracted lavish praise from reviewers in the Daily Mail and Sunday Times for the ‘huge gaps’ it exposed in the official 9/11 story. It became a non-fiction bestseller despite a wall of silence by the broadcast media and condemnation in a special web page set up by the US State Department. Since then the story has produced many sinister new twists, including: Pentagon whistleblowers have accused the ‘Independent 9/11 Commission’ of lying; long-suppressed eyewitness testimony has been released confirming multiple explosions in the Twin Towers before and during their collapses; the much vaunted video purporting to prove that Flight 77 hit the Pentagon showed nothing at all; and an analysis of terrorist trials and arrests since 2001 indicates that far from the ‘600 Al Qaeda sleeper cells in the US’ (CIA) there were none at all. In this sequel to 9/11 Revealed, Ian Henshall examines the precedents of black operations by the US/UK, from Northern Ireland to Italy, from Vietnam to Kosovo; he looks at the various 9/11 theories, including the latest twists in the official story, and tests them against the evidence. Finally, he asks what might happen when the storm of popular outrage collides with the regime in Washington and London and outlines the radical changes needed if Washington and London are ever again to function as genuine democracies. In this expanded version of ‘9/11 Revealed’ Ian Henshall examines the precedents of black operations by the US/UK, from Northern Ireland to Italy, from Vietnam to Kosovo; he looks at the various 9/11 theories, including the latest twists in the official story, and tests them against the evidence. An eminent analysis of the 9/11 attacks are the works of David Ray Griffin. However, this book contains excellent graphic material (contradicting the official version of the facts) and sketches a good overall framework (`the big picture’). On our planet, the top third of its inhabitants enjoy a relative prosperity often based on overwork, while the rest lives in traditional poverty or in a real living hell. Within the top third, a plutocracy, a Global Dominance Group of some 200 people (P. Phillips), pulls the strings in the ongoing fight for wealth and power in the western world, helped by governments, the media conglomerates and the military and intelligence communities controlled by it. After the fall of the Berlin Wall, the oligarchy needed a new enemy for the consolidation and the expansion of its power base. Communism was replaced by terrorism. Ian Henshall sees the `war on terror’ as a tactical weapon in the fight for the extension of the wealth and power of the plutocrats. After the 9/11 attacks centuries-old democratic rights were hollowed out. The presidential power was enhanced by giving the president the right to override the Constitution in times of war (on terror). But, the author also sees a Washington oligarchy confronted with a crisis of unpopularity. Moreover, only 16 % of the US population believes the entire official version of the 9/11 massacre. He rightly calls for a major criminal investigation by an independent Criminal Commission of all aspects of the events.

Version 1.0.0

Operation Gladio: NATO history of false flag attacks. Daniele Ganser book. Richard Cotterell book. For the past 40 years, teams of secret agents have bombed and murdered scores of innocent civilians to keep control of Europe for their political masters. Developed from “stay behinds”–Nazis who remained in occupied territories at the end of World War 2 to resist the communist threat–this secret network changed from being defenders of state security into attackers of the established political order. It’s only since the Gladio’s existence was acknowledged in 1990 that the impact of its shadowy role in post-war Europe has emerged This fascinating new study shows how the CIA and the British secret service, in collaboration with the military alliance NATO and European military secret services, set up a network of clandestine anti-communist armies in Western Europe after World War II. These secret soldiers were trained on remote islands in the Mediterranean and in unorthodox warfare centres in England and in the United States by the Green Berets and SAS Special Forces. The network was armed with explosives, machine guns and high-tech communication equipment hidden in underground bunkers and secret arms caches in forests and mountain meadows. In some countries the secret army linked up with right-wing terrorist who in a secret war engaged in political manipulation, harrassement of left wing parties, massacres, coup d’états and torture. Codenamed ‘Gladio’ (‘the sword’), the Italian secret army was exposed in 1990 by Italian Prime Minister Giulio Andreotti to the Italian Senate, whereupon the press spoke of “The best kept, and most damaging, political-military secret since World War II” (Observer, 18. November 1990) and observed that “The story seems straight from the pages of a political thriller.” (The Times, November 19, 1990). Ever since, so-called ‘stay-behind’ armies of NATO have also been discovered in France, Spain, Portugal, Germany, Belgium, the Netherlands, Luxemburg, Denmark, Norway, Sweden, Finland, Switzerland, Austria, Greece and Turkey. They were internationally coordinated by the Pentagon and NATO and had their last known meeting in the NATO-linked Allied Clandestine Committee (ACC) in Brussels in October 1990. A seminal work in which Danielle Ganser provides us with the coordinates to help us put things like the so-called War On Terror into their proper contexts. He shows that the majority (if not all) of the western European governments, supposedly democratic in nature, have engaged in activities which can only be described as undemocratic since the end of WWII. The necessity to “prevent the spread of Communism” is an invalid question when examined from the standpoint of the democratic will; for if the majority favour Communism then, theoretically, that is what democracy is all about. And there can be no question of degrees; democracy either exists or it does not. Like free speech, you cannot have democracy up to a point. That there has since the 1990s been little public accountability (despite public acknowledgement that the activities did take place) raises crucially important questions about the validity of the War On Terror, British involvement in Northern Ireland and elsewhere, and many other similar occupations and internal conflicts as well as many of the events which have been attributed to “terrorists” over the past decade or so. For not only do we not know that the countries involved actually dismantled the stay-behind armies in the 1990s, we don’t know which countries ran stay-behind armies in each others’ countries – and whether these were likewise dismantled. In fact, the main protagonists (the UK & USA) have so far refused to comment. Whilst many would argue that this is essential to protect national security, this argument, when examined logically, is baseless. For if we truly do live in democracies then no government should be above the law. And when supposedly-demoractic governments encourage – or turn a blind eye to – actions which are undeniably anti-democratic then it would seem to stand to reason that we actually don’t live in democracies at all. Danielle Ganser has added one more link into an ever-strengthening chain of evidence that democracy truly does not exist. A truly disturbing story; this is history that everyone should know.

Webster Tarpley. This book is probably the most concise and well researched book on the 911 conspiracy. Exploring all relevant angles to the story, this book in my opinion is an awesome asset to someone who has already “woken up” to the myth of the “official” version of events. I would therefore recommend this to intellects and would recommend other easier read books to those just exploring for the first time the false claims of the official story about 911. For the average guy on the street, no doubt this book is interesting – but boy, is it hard going! For those already aware of the false “facts” about 911 and already interested an absolute MUST BUY as it really is the greatest compendium about 911. For those who are just interested – buy something like Paul Joseph Watsons “Order out of Chaos” to whet your apetite. For Tarpley, terrorism is synthetic: composed by patsies lead by deception, moles, professionals, mediamen, controllers. It is sponsored by states, organized and directed by a rogue network of high government, intelligence and military officials together with foreign agencies. It is controlled by an aggressive, imperialistic, murderous oligarchy/plutocracy, which restlessly seeks to preserve its privileges through conflict and confrontation: war, violence, hatred, coups, martial law, terrorism, manipulation. The dollar’s reserve status is the true heart of US international arrogance. It was attacked by Saddam Hussein, when he asked to be paid in euros for his oil. Another very serious threat is secular Arab nationalism, which could overthrow loyal fundamentalist Islamic regimes in the Middle East. Progressive nationalists in the Arab world are and have been relentlessly victims of terrorist attacks. His analysis of the 9/11 events is profound: options insider trading, the collapse of three towers while only two where hit, planes flown by remote control?, who were the hijackers? Are some still alive?, no scrambling of the planes!). It is partly based on the books of Nafeez Mosaddeq Ahmed, Michel Chossudovsky, Thierry Meyssan and David Ray Griffin). Tarpley points courageously his finger at financiers, top-level bureaucrats, flag-rank military officers, top intelligence officials and technical specialists, calling them ‘technocrats of death’. They profited highly from the 9/11 attacks and created a new world of preventive and pre-emptive war, of first use of nuclear weapons, of unilateral aggression, of barbarian racism and hatred, of the glorification of violence and killing, of force and the threat of force. The advice of the Bush regime to the American people is: ‘Be afraid! Always!’. W. G. Tarpley’s research stands in sharp contrast with the mainstream media, clearly gagged by the powerful and paralyzed by autocensure. They know all too well that truth is dangerous for the masses. Therefore, their key-word is ‘omertà’. This book is a powerful exposé of a world dominated by not democratically controlled, cynical and deadly intelligence networks. A really frightening analysis.

https://youtu.be/rbZsoCuPD-w?t=145

William Rodriguez – janitor. 9/11 – An American Building Maintenance employee for twenty years, responsible for inspection and maintenance at the World Trade Center, who held the master key for the stairs. He was the last person to leave the building on September 11 and has been credited with saving many lives. For his efforts, he received the National Hero Award from the Senate of Puerto Rico. Founder, Hispanic Victims Group. Regarding an explosion in the sub-basement of the World Trade Center North Tower on 9/11, prior to any airplane impact. “When I heard the sound of the explosion, the floor beneath my feet vibrated, the walls started to cracking and it everything started shaking,” said Rodriguez, who was huddled together with at least 14 other people in the office… “Seconds after the first massive explosion below in the basement still rattled the floor, I hear another explosion from way above,” said Rodriguez. “Although I was unaware at the time, this was the airplane hitting the tower, it occurred moments after the first explosion.” But before Rodriguez had time to think, coworker Felipe David stormed into the basement office with severe burns on his face and arms, screaming for help and yelling “explosion! explosion! explosion!” David had been in front of a nearby freight elevator on sub-level 1 about 400 feet from the office when fire burst out of the elevator shaft, causing his injuries. “He was burned terribly,” said Rodriguez. “The skin was hanging off his hands and arms. His injuries couldn’t have come from the airplane above, but only from a massive explosion below. I don’t care what the government says, what scientists say. I saw a man burned terribly form a fire that was caused from an explosion below. “I know there were explosives placed below the trade center. I helped a man to safety who is living proof, living proof the government story is a lie and a cover-up… “I disagree 100% with the government story, ” said Rodriguez. “I met with the 9/11 Commission behind closed doors and they essentially discounted everything I said regarding the use of explosives to bring down the north tower. “And I contacted NIST previously four times without a response. Finally, this week I asked them before they came up with their conclusion that jet fuel brought down the towers, if they ever considered my statements or the statements of an other survivors who heard explosions. They just stared at me with blank faces and didn’t have an answers. William Rodriguez, formerly an American Building Maintenance employee for twenty years, was responsible for inspection and maintenance at the World Trade Center and held the master key for the stairs, He was the last person to leave the building on September 11 and has been credited with saving many lives. For his efforts, he received the National Hero Award from the Senate of Puerto Rico. Since September 11, Mr. Rodriguez has been very active in all aspects of the relief efforts, including the memorial, the federal fund and the charities, as well as appearing before many government officials on such topics. William Rodriguez, janitor with a master key, helped save lives at the World Trade Center on 9/11 Titles are generated by AI from Meta 911 – HE WAS THE JANITOR – And on September 11, 2001 the key in his pocket suddenly became one of the most important keys in America. His name was William Rodriguez. He had worked at the World Trade Center for roughly 20 years. That morning, Rodriguez was in the basement of the North Tower when American Airlines Flight 11 struck the building. Chaos erupted. A badly burned man appeared. Rodriguez helped him. Then he could have gotten out. He went back … Because Rodriguez had something almost nobody else in that building had: A MASTER KEY ?? It opened the stairwell doors throughout the North Tower. Firefighters and police were rushing into a building thousands of terrified people were trying to escape. Rodriguez knew the building. And he had the key. So he went UP with the rescuers. Floor after floor. Door after door. Unlock. Open. Keep moving. People were coming down. Rodriguez kept going up. He reportedly made it as high as the 39th floor before firefighters ordered him to turn around. Think about that. The building had been struck by a passenger jet. Smoke was spreading. People were desperately trying to get OUT. And the janitor was climbing farther INSIDE. Rodriguez eventually made it back down and survived. But approximately 200 people he knew at the World Trade Center did not. 25 years later he still carries the memories of that morning. And he still has the master key. We remember the firefighters. We remember the police officers. We remember the passengers who fought back. ??We should also remember the janitor with the key. William Rodriguez wasn’t carrying a badge. He wasn’t carrying a weapon. He was carrying something much simpler. A key. And when America was attacked, he used what he had to help save whoever he could. Never forget William Rodriguez.

‘In Plane Sight’ 2004 documentary. 9/11 In Plane Sight – The Director’s Cut by Dave Vonkleist (2004) 911 in Plane Site – The Director’s Cut I’ve written reviews of a lot of 9/11 related DVDs. Some sought to explain the science behind why the towers fell. Some put faces to the names of the victims, from civilians to emergency personnel. And some try to turn members of the power structure into glowing heroes. But 911: In Plane Site is the first DVD that I’ve seen that asks questions about some of the weird anomalies left amidst the wreckage and debris of that day. The roughly seventy-five minute-long main program is hosted by Dave vonKleist, the plain-talking host of the conspiracy-minded “Power Hour.” VonKleist takes what could in less delicate hands come off as paranoid and deluded and makes it curiously fascinating. This program features no bells or whistles: It simply places the host in front of a bank of monitors and allows him to point out strange contradictions in the generally accepted facts about September 11th. Among these inconsistencies are the size of the hole in the Pentagon’s outer wall (which apparently would not have allowed for a plane of that size), the nature of the damage to the building, and the lack of visible plane debris. VonKleist shows a study released by the American Society of Civil Engineers that leaves out crucial information like reinforced beams in the Pentagon’s walls and the plane’s tail, seemingly negating their findings. He points out clearly visible computers and books that should have been destroyed in the impact but are perfectly fine in the photos. And he plays countless eye-witness reports that make it seem more like a missile hit the Pentagon. He also shows numerous photos of the plane about to strike the south tower of the World Trade Center – images we’ve seen literally thousands of times before – but he points out a strange protrusion on the belly of the plane. This, taken along with eyewitness accounts pulled from news footage claiming that the plane had no windows and no commercial markings, seems to suggest that the plane was actually a military plane. As if things weren’t weird enough, vonKleist points out an instantaneous flash at the front of the plane the moment before it strikes the tower. I figured that this was a reflection glancing off the plane on that sunny day, but vonKleist shows that the flash is visible from four different angles, thanks to the incredible media coverage of the second WTC crash. Then he uses the one known video shot of the first collision (from the Naudet brothers’ 9/11) to show that the flash is present there too.

‘Loose Change’ film. Loose Change II, (2005) Directed by Dylan Avery What really happened on 9/11? 2nd Edition of Loose Change documentary. What if…September 11th was not a surprise attack on America, but rather, a cold and calculated genocide by our own government?We were told that the twin towers were hit by commercial jetliners and subsequently brought down by jet fuel. We were told that the Pentagon was hit by a Boeing 757. We were told that flight 93 crashed in Shanksville, Pennsylvania. We were told that nineteen Arabs from halfway across the globe, acting under orders from Osama Bin Laden, were responsible. What you will see here will prove without a shadow of a doubt that everything you know about 9/11 is a complete fabrication. Conspiracy theory? It’s not a theory if you can prove it.Written and narrated by Dylan Avery, this film presents a rebuttal to the official version of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks and the 9/11 Commission Report. Why it matters… Today’s Freshmen in High School will be learning about the events of September 11th, 2001 as an event that happened before they were born. Yet, the relevance of 9/11 echoes through our lives to this day. It is impossible to avoid the places we as a nation have gone. Scars and open wounds stain our stars and stripes. We must understand that what we were told about that day is a lie and those lies drastically changed the course of peace to a course of perpetual war. How many more people need to die until we realize a reevaluation of the day’s events is needed? Loose Change was created as a voice for the victims of September 11th, 2001, to ask the questions they were robbed of the ability to ask about their fate. A new investigation into the events of that fateful day can give context to the perils we fight today. It’s not too late. Ask questions, demand answers. The film, presented against a synth-pop soundtrack, argues that a small cabal of top-level neocons executed the attacks as a pretext for the invasion of Iraq, the control of Middle Eastern oil fields and a massive increase in American military power. Its lines of argument include the theory that a missile and not a commercial airplane hit the Pentagon, and that United Flight 93 did not crash in Pennsylvania but instead landed safely in Cleveland — or was perhaps blown up or shot down. The filmmakers can’t say for sure. “Loose Change” — the title refers to the idea that political change is on the move — relies on news footage and press reports, including many early-response stories from the hours immediately following the attacks. Comments from witnesses and on-the-scene television reports describing “explosions,” for example, are used to support one of the film’s central theories, that the twin towers were rigged with explosives. “There are some concrete issues that everyone agrees on that are irrefutable,” Avery said in an interview before the screening, ” … and (one of them) is the controlled demolition of the World Trade Center.” By “everyone,” Avery means himself and others in the self-proclaimed “9/11 Truth Movement,” which includes radio hosts, academics and amateur Internet investigators here and abroad.  

Patriot Platform balaclava-clad protests appear at Dover and Portsmouth, Reform UK’s Zia Yusuf being interviewed about protests – then Danny Tommo turns up to take over the live Sky News interview. Protest organiser confronts Zia Yusuf at scene of Portsmouth migrant arrivals The founder of a group of protesters who blocked roads in Dover on Saturday has confronted Reform UK’s Zia Yusuf, telling him his party leader Nigel Farage needs to be “careful with his words”. Daniel Thomas, known as Danny Tommo – who is an associate of ring-wing activist Tommy Robinson, claims to have organised a protest in Dover on Saturday which saw men in black clothing and balaclavas blocking roads. He was also on the scene when migrants arrived in Portsmouth on Sunday. Interrupting Mr Yusuf during an interview in the city, Mr Thomas accused Mr Farage of calling protesters at the Unite the Kingdom rally in London earlier in the year “knuckle-draggers”. He said: “You have to tell Nigel… we had a million people on the streets of London in every colour, every creed, every background, every ethnicity… he called us knuckle-draggers. “I understand Nigel is going to be prime minister one day and I understand he has to set a standard, which will basically be that you know he can’t just come out and say everything’s great and these guys are fantastic, but Nigel needs to be very careful with his words.” Mr Yusuf told Mr Thomas to ensure there was no violence from his group towards the police. Reform UK’s home affairs spokesman said: “I just want to make that really clear, just so that we’re really clear about this, right? There is never any excuse for violence against police officers who are doing their job. They are taking orders, and that is what it is.” Mr Thomas said there was no violence in Dover and, when questioned about his group’s masks and attire being intimidating, said: “The reason people felt potentially intimidated was because of the faces covered. I’ve made that point very clear. “The only reason they’ve done that is because no-one wants to be labelled far right.” Mr Thomas founded the group Patriot Platform in July, promoting it as a project to build “a mighty patriotic army”, partly to push back against migrants arriving in the UK by small boat. Mr Thomas has openly recruited supporters using social media, but his protest action planned at Dover appears to have come as a surprise to the authorities, with Kent Police claiming it was “spontaneous”. Livestreaming while standing in the sea at Portsmouth on Sunday, he said: “Roads are all blocked, they are never going to be able to leave here.” He added: “It was only yesterday (at the protests in Dover) when we warned them that we will not accept this any more, and that this is no longer an option to tell us that the boat numbers are down.” Some eight boats carrying 625 people arrived in the UK having crossed the English Channel on Sunday, Home Office data shows.

Matt Jukes, Deputy Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police, and arrester/detainer of pro-Palestine journalists – new facial recognition software policing the protests and people being masked.

Patriot Platform – two protests this week. Their video narrated by a US lady, claiming they are Christian. Are Patriot Platform like Nazi SA street armies.

Sam Williamism – if Marches go past Scotland Yard – facial recognition software. shouting at an empty building. But what I do have a problem with is what happened next. So, let me set the scene. You’ve you’ve exercised your democratic right, freedom of speech, and then you’re going to march somewhere. You really really want people to see you. So from here, you’re going to march somewhere. Logically, where are you going to march? The Supreme Court is just over there. Um, you could go up Victoria Street. You could go to Victoria Station, but what would be the point in that, especially on a Saturday? Um, you could go down there like go visit MI5. There’s no point in going down there. Um, you could go across the bridge to Waterloo. You could go up here, Downing Street, Trafalga Square. If I was on a protest march and I’d finished shouting at the building, I would go up there. Downing Street, Trafalga Square. Iconic. The best place to go. The buildings are still totally empty, but it just feels better. And I think that’s the most important thing. But they didn’t do that. No. Where did they go? Yes, that’s right. They went [music] to Scotland yard. Guess I created a little bit of uh internet drama the other week, didn’t I? Because um I had a very simple question which is just, you know, why why on earth would the digital ID march be brought past um Scotland Yard? And it did create quite a lot of drama. But, you know, I I’d sort of decided to just to leave it, you know, just to leave it until yesterday, the 1st of November once the people had finished shouting at the Supreme Court, the march came up here, straight past Scotland Yard. There’s the camera that I was talking about the other day, by the way. I can’t see it. There we go. There it is. Um, why on earth did they come past here? Well, there was also a counterprotest against them. And where was the counterprotest held? It was held here at New Scotland Yard. And I was just like, dude, what on earth is going wrong? And why are all of these protests at New Scotland Yard? The police are the public and the public are the police. Pelian principal. Number seven, my favorite. So, you may remember that in my video I was questioning if they’re doing facial recognition with that camera, do they not have to um announce that they’re doing it, put up a sign or whatever? And I found out something extremely interesting. And I’ve cracked it. I’ve I’ve I’ve solved the Enigma code. Of course, I I I went to Charing Cross Police Station and I spoke to a young boy um who was impersonating a police officer and it said and he said, and I quote, “As far as I’m aware, our facial recognition is only done through the vans. I’m not aware of any facial recognition schemes that we do through buildings.” Well, he was wrong. Very wrong. So what they do with the vans is called LFR, live facial recognition where they are comparing faces against a known database of wanted people and supposedly if it’s not you, the machine just forgets about you. It forgot you ever saw you, you know, straight away, no problem.

Foreign Secretary, Ed Milliband, imposes sanctions on Israel in 6-9 months’ time. The legislation I have announced today will be in place within 6 to 9 months and we will also take more immediate steps. Today we are sanctioning a further set of extremist settlers who have supported or incited acts of violence against Palestinian communities. And I can also announce that we are extending the existing global human rights regime such that it will enable swifter action to deter settlement expansion, including crucially seeking to present the development of E1. I also want to address the question of arms sales. We have already suspended over 30 arms licences used by the IDF in Gaza. That suspension remains fully in place. We will now also refuse all licence applications for arms and other exports that materially contribute to the occupation, in effect a double lock against arms sales. This means the ban on such exports will now remain as long as the occupation persists. To advance the two state solution, we also need viable and effective Palestinian governance. On the question of genocide, the UK has always supported full, robust and fair judicial processes to consider allegations, with final determinations made by competent courts before the British government reaches a conclusion. This has been the case for all of the genocides since the 1948 Genocide Convention: Rwanda, Srebrenica, Cambodia, and acts against the Yazidi people. This will remain our policy. It is right that this issue has been brought before the ICJ and I want to make it clear that we support the Court in coming to its determination. So accountability for what has happened in Gaza matters. But even more urgent is action to address the ongoing crisis. Because today in Gaza, the death and suffering continue. Nearly a year ago, Madame Deputy Speaker, a ceasefire was declared. Yet over 1,200 Palestinians have been killed since. And the people of Gaza are experiencing a totally avoidable humanitarian catastrophe, I am afraid, driven by decisions of the Israeli government. Last week I talked to courageous doctors and humanitarian aid workers who have served in Gaza. It was a heartbreaking conversation. They recounted: Children dying waiting for medical treatment. People forced to live next to open sewage and without shelter. And food insecurity rampant. I’m sure the whole House agrees, this is unconscionable. So I pledge we will continue to do everything we can to provide all the humanitarian support possible to help the people of Gaza. UK-supported hospitals in Gaza will enable around 800,000 medical consultations this year and essential health services for patients. UK expertise will deliver care to over a thousand child amputees. And we recently welcomed another wave of students from Gaza coming to study in Britain and we will welcome more. But in truth, unless Israel changes course, the situation will remain dire. So we are taking further steps – both ourselves and with others. Our extension of the global human rights sanctions regime will enable us to target those responsible for violations of international humanitarian law, whether in Gaza or anywhere else in the world. And we will at the UN General Assembly in New York later this month shine the clearest and harshest spotlight on what is happening and what must change. And with Jordan, we will convene countries across the world to lead a call for action on health and humanitarian access. We will also lend the UK’s voice to the growing global alliance of countries – led by Arab partners in the region – calling for the full implementation of the US-led 20 point plan, the rejection of extremism, and for a lasting end to the cycles of violence. As we implement the policy measures I have announced today, we will continue to assess the government of Israel by its actions. We want to see a new approach – in both Gaza and the West Bank. Madame Deputy Speaker, today we refuse to be bystanders to further suffering and to the destruction of the two state solution. We call out what is unlawful. We act on the import of goods from illegal settlements. We ban advertising of illegal settlements We act on services to prevent new settlement expansion. We act on settler violence. We support accountability for what has happened in Gaza. And we pledge to galvanise the international community to confront the ongoing and urgent humanitarian crisis. Above all, we say: Britain is not silent in the face of deep injustice and nor is it powerless.

Joe Banks joins Tony and Martin. His article ‘How Bristol’s Tallest Building Will Be Linked To Israel’s Atrocities’. He explains how the sanctions will effect the companies involved in this building. Joe Banks @JoePBanks Yesterday’s announcement that the UK will ban goods from illegal Israeli settlements was only one part of a much wider new sanctions regime. The government says it will also target companies and individuals providing “construction, infrastructure, financing, or real estate” for settlement expansion. Foreign Secretary Ed Miliband warned those who “finance or facilitate illegal settlements” that they will face UK sanctions. That has potentially significant implications for a story I investigated last month for @MiddleEastEye .What will become Bristol’s tallest tower is currently rising in the city centre. Behind it is Israeli pension and insurance giant Menora Mivtachim, which backs Cain’s UK student-housing platform – a partnership whose portfolio was valued at more than £800m after its expansion into Bristol, with developments across Russell Group university cities. According to Who Profits, Menora Mivtachim have: (1) – Directly financed settlement construction, including 80 homes in Ariel and 84 homes in Ma’ale Adumim – the major West Bank settlement adjoining the crucial E1 area, whose expansion the UK is specifically seeking to deter. (2) – Financed a 1,642-home development in Katzrin in the occupied Syrian Golan, alongside tourism, roads and infrastructure. (3) – Holds a 74% stake in a solar project in the occupied West Bank, jointly owned with the Israeli settlement of Na’ama. (4) – Built significant shareholdings in companies involved in settlement construction, infrastructure and services. (5) – Holds significant stakes in companies providing security, fuel and other services to settlements across the occupied territories. All this sits alongside the fact that they have helped finance major Israeli military projects, including the IDF’s huge new intelligence campus in the Negev, intended to house Unit 8200, the signals-intelligence unit behind AI targeting tools used in Gaza. None of this means Menora will be sanctioned. The legislation and designation criteria are still to come. But yesterday’s announcement puts my investigation in a new light: Menora has documented financial links to the kinds of settlement construction, infrastructure, financing and commercial activity the UK government now says its new sanctions regime will target.

Lord Levy on how London Jews are dismayed by Netanyahu. Declassified documents show UK aware of Israeli war crimes for 24 years UK Foreign Office files, public since 2024, record warnings about Israeli violence and rights abuses since 2002. Share Declassified documents show UK aware of Israeli war crimes for 24 years on social media British diplomats condemned Israeli conduct in the occupied West Bank as a pattern of human rights abuses in 2002 – 24 years before London took a tougher stance towards Israel this week. These decades-old condemnations are contained in UK Foreign Office files written during the administration of former Prime Minister Tony Blair while Israel undertook a brutal 2002 offensive in the occupied West Bank. The files, released in 2024 and reported in a recent investigation by the website Declassified UK, record British diplomats describing a pattern of abuses by a state their own government would go on to arm for the next two decades. Today, Blair sits on the Board of Peace that presides over Gaza, where Israel’s disregard for Palestinian lives and the rules of war has been demonstrated on a genocidal scale, while the UK’s newly seated leadership refer to Israel’s actions as “a stain on the conscience of the world”. But what did the British government already know about Israel’s actions more than 20 years ago? What the files say That record begins in March 2002, when then-Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon launched Operation Defensive Shield in retaliation for a wave of attacks by Palestinian armed groups, including Hamas. Israeli forces tore through the occupied West Bank, killing 500 Palestinians in a single month, mostly civilians, and injuring another 1,500. British officials were deeply aware of the scale of violations committed by Israeli forces. A Foreign Office official wrote at the time that Israeli military operations in the West Bank involved a “pattern” of “human rights abuses”. A senior British army officer was more blunt, calling the Israeli military a “second-rate, ill-disciplined, swaggering and bullying force”. “They routinely use excessive force such as firing at the ‘legs’ of stone throwers or at ‘car tyres’ with the inevitable stream of ambulances ferrying youths to hospital with fatal bullet wounds to the head and body,” wrote the officer who was unnamed in the files. Those concerns were put to the Israeli government directly. Lord Michael Levy, Blair’s special envoy, warned then-Defence Minister Binyamin Ben-Eliezer that there was no military solution, and that the campaign would only produce more suicide bombers. The Israeli violations described in the files have only multiplied, even becoming routine across occupied Palestinian territory. Officials also wrote of Red Cross staff threatened at gunpoint, and their ambulances not allowed to reach the wounded. Today, intimidation and targeting of medics has become standard operating procedure for Israeli forces and settlers. The World Health Organization has documented 3,254 Israeli attacks on healthcare across the occupied Palestinian territory over 20 years, killing or injuring more than 4,200 patients and medical staff. More than half of those attacks – and the deadliest of them – have come in the past three years.

Peter Oborne, DDN, on UK sanctions on Israel. Peter Oborne: Britain has FINALLY stood up to Israel PoliticsJOE Peter Oborne, journalist with Middle East Eye, joined Ava earlier in the week to discuss Ed Miliband’s plans to sanction illegal Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank. He tells us that Ed Miliband finally has Labour on the right side of public opinion. Peter Oborne’s book Complicit: Britain’s Role in the Destruction of Gaza is out with OR Books now. Chapters: 00:00 Why Oborne admires Miliband 00:59 Is Miliband standing up to Israel? 02:23 Britain takes action against settlements 03:41 Britain’s changing position on Israel 04:39 The West Bank and international law 06:10 Is Britain helping Israel? 07:34 Why Starmer couldn’t do this 08:26 Starmer the lawyer vs Starmer the politician 09:20 How Starmer got it wrong 09:49 The tragedy of Starmer’s majority 10:48 Has Labour been captured by Muslim voters? 11:56 Labour finally responds to public opinion

UAE Bin Ziad gave warning to Netanyahu before October 7th attack. UAE warned Netanyahu of major Hamas operation days before Oct. 7 attack, news report says JERUSALEM (AP) — Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was directly warned by the president of the United Arab Emirates that Hamas was planning a major offensive just days before the militant group attacked on Oct. 7, 2023, according to an Israeli newspaper report. UAE President Mohammed bin Zayed spoke with Netanyahu 10 days before the attack and said Yahya Sinwar, the leader of Hamas in Gaza at the time, was planning an operation, the Haaretz daily said. Bin Zayed said it would lead to bloodshed and could destabilize the region and undermine the Abraham Accords, the normalization agreements between Israel and several Arab and Muslim-majority nations, the newspaper reported. But Netanyahu “reacted with relative calm,” according to Haaretz, which said he assured bin Zayed that Israel was prepared for any scenario and a possible attack was more likely to come from the occupied West Bank. Hamas militants killed some 1,200 people and took another 251 hostage in the Oct. 7 attack. Hundreds of Israelis, mostly soldiers, have been killed in continued fighting in wars in Gaza, Lebanon and Iran. Haaretz reported Netanyahu’s office called the report an “absolute lie” and said Netanyahu did not speak with the UAE president “during the period in question and received no warning from him.” His office denied Tuesday that the UAE gave him a warning. “If there was any relevant information, it was passed through intelligence channels between the two countries,” the statement said. The UAE’s Foreign Ministry also said that it would not comment on “speculation regarding conversations between government leaders.” Israel and the UAE have maintained “open and direct lines of communication” since they formally established ties five years ago, the statement said. It added: “When necessary, all relevant intelligence has been and continues to be communicated.” Israel is holding national elections next month and Netanyahu’s actions around the time of the Oct. 7 attack are a key issue in the campaign.

Elections in Israel. Joe Banks on Substack – Temple Scenes – and Joe Banks.com. He’s a Former General and a Grieving Father. And He Could Defeat Netanyahu. Gadi Eisenkot’s party is leading many polls. Will he loosen Netanyahu’s grip on power? KARMIEL, Israel — It was a gunshot to the head of a Palestinian militant that first exposed the gulf between Gadi Eisenkot and Benjamin Netanyahu. In March 2016, two Palestinians armed with knives attacked Israeli soldiers in the West Bank, wounding one of them. The soldiers opened fire, killing one attacker and leaving the other wounded on the ground. Several minutes later, a 19-year-old Israeli soldier named Elor Azaria cocked his rifle, aimed at the wounded attacker’s head and pulled the trigger. Azaria said he had felt threatened. The question of whether the soldier should face a military trial divided the country. To some Israelis, Azaria was no criminal but a soldier who had killed a terrorist. To others, Azaria had carried out an extrajudicial killing or even murder. He was eventually convicted of manslaughter by a military court. Eisenkot, then chief of staff of the Israel Defense Forces, defended the decision to prosecute Azaria, arguing that shooting an attacker who had already been incapacitated was incompatible with the values of the Israeli military. Netanyahu sided with the soldier and called for him to be pardoned. Elor Azaria sits with his parents and his girlfriend Orel at a military court. Israeli soldier Elor Azaria sits with his parents and his girlfriend Orel, left, as he awaits the verdict in his trial in Tel Aviv in January 2017. Azaria was convicted of manslaughter in a case that divided the country. A decade later, the dispute still reverberates. A former member of Netanyahu’s war cabinet, Eisenkot has seemingly overnight emerged as the prime minister’s most formidable challenger ahead of Israel’s parliamentary election on Oct. 27. His centrist Yashar! party — which he founded last year — was born out of rising discontent with Netanyahu’s response to the attack by Hamas on Israel on Oct. 7, 2023 and the war in Gaza that followed. In several nationwide polls,

Andy Thomas, author and website The Truth Agenda, joins Tony and Martin online. He discusses the anomalies of the official 9/11 story, and how some of the madder conspiracies have muddied the water. Fascination with conspiracies is massive right now, especially since the rise of Donald Trump, who is both the subject of many conspiracy theories and also the purveyor of them. New theories appear on social media on a near-daily basis, and with continual claims and counter-claims about fake news, it’s hard to know what to believe. To help clear up the confusion, here is a new edition of the most balanced and informed book on the topic, now updated with all the latest events, including pro- and anti-Trump theories, Edward Snowden’s mass-surveillance claims, post-truth issues, and much more. In this outstanding guide to conspiracies, researcher Andy Thomas looks at all the major theories, from the Roman Empire to the present day, exploring the social and psychological factors that have prompted them to spread. The accounts are stripped of unfounded opinion and presented factually, dramatically highlighting the core issues. Are we really under everyday mass-surveillance, as Edward Snowden claims? Is the rise of Donald Trump and global populism a genuine movement of the people or a manipulated social control experiment? Is there a secret governing elite ruling from the shadows, using fear and economic manipulation to create a network of global superstates? Could the attacks of 9/11 have been engineered by agencies within the USA itself? Andy Thomas invites you to read accounts and analyses of these and many other issues, to consider the facts and decide for yourself. … Reasoned, objective and most importantly fair…. a valuable addition to the existing canon of literature in this most fractious of fascinating, sometimes worrying and highly recommended.’ – Phenomena Magazine’Whether steeped in conspiracy lore or just a novice, you’ll get a better handle on what’s really going on in the world by reading Andy Thomas’s Conspiracies.’ – Nexus MagazineIn today’s environment, with trust in governments at an all-time low, conspiracy theories have found a new currency, and websites and social networking ensure they receive a wider and more rapid spread than ever before. But how do we separate truth from imagination? Was Princess Diana murdered, as many people think, despite all the official denials? Did NASA really go to the Moon, when anomalies in the photographic record suggest otherwise? Could 9/11 really have been set up by agencies within the USA itself? The author opens the conspiracy casebook by examining the mindset of those who believe in conspiracies, and considers whether the dismissive attitude towards them has been fair.Part Two looks into history to establish that when conspiracies do occur, credibility should therefore be given to belief in some of the alleged plots and cover-ups of today. This leads into a well-argued examination of some of the most popular conspiracies of our times, including theories over assassinations, UFO cover-ups, and widely voiced concerns over 9/11 and the ‘New World Order’.Part Three draws the conclusion that while not all conspiracy theories can be proven, they do at least draw attention to paths not to take, and can be valuable in helping to create a better world where new trust and hope can be forged. Are we living in a world of control, of oppression, of habitual deception? Is this really how things are, or simply human nature massively distorted through a dark lens? The truth probably lies somewhere in the middle. In today’s environment, with trust in governments at an all-time low, conspiracy theories have found a new currency, and websites and social networking ensure they receive a wider and more rapid spread than ever before. But how do we separate truth from imagination? Was Princess Diana murdered, as many people think, despite all the official denials? Did NASA really go to the Moon, when anomalies in the photographic record suggest otherwise? Could 9/11 really have been set up by agencies within the USA itself? The author opens the conspiracy casebook by examining the mindset of those who believe in conspiracies, and considers whether the dismissive attitude towards them has been fair.

“9-11/Israel did it” Interest of • Kevin Barrett • Christopher Bollyn • Laurent Guyénot • Anthony Hall • Alan Hart • Kenneth O’Keefe • Kees van der Pijl • Paul Craig Roberts • “Rebekah Roth” • Alan Sabrosky • Stephen Sizer • Victor Thorn •9-11/Israel did it/Israeli art scam Evidence for the proposition that the Israeli deep state was involved in the 9-11 event. This article presents evidence that the Israeli deep state was a prime mover in the events of 9-11. Note that it does not imply that other groups (i.e. the US deep state and maybe others like the Saudi Arabian deep state) were not involved in both the commission and cover up of the September 11 attacks. The 9-11 event advanced the Neocon PNAC agenda, with its explicitly stated need for “…a catastrophic and catalysing event – like a new Pearl Harbor” [1] in order to mobilise US public opinion for already planned wars, the effects of which would be to destroy Israel’s enemies. Contents 1 Official narrative 2 Control of World Trade Center Complex 2.1 Four key Zionist Network assets 2.2 World Trade Center Security 2.2.1 Who Killed John O’Neil? 2.3 Airport Security 3 Prior Knowledge 3.1 Gomel Chesed Cemetery Incident 3.2 Israeli Citizens Get Tipped Off 3.3 ZIM forewarning 4 Mossad connections 4.1 U.S. Army Study: On Mossad 4.2 Israeli espionage around 9/11 4.3 After 9/11 – More detentions of Israelis 4.4 Five Dancing Israelis 4.5 “We are not your problem”? 4.6 Truck Bomb Destined for George Washington Bridge 4.7 Mural Van 4.8 Urban Moving Systems 4.9 Ptech Software systems – Computer control backdoor 4.10 MITRE corporation (computer software) 4.11 Precision guided plane? 4.12 Rabbi Dov Zakheim and Systems Planning Corporation 5 Cover Up 5.1 9/11 “Investigations” 5.2 Chief judges 5.3 Others 5.4 9/11 Commission 5.5 Crime Scene Evidence Quickly Removed and Destroyed 5.6 Cass Sunstein ‘s “Conspiracy Theories” 6 Other circumstances 6.1 Job holders on 9/11 6.2 Who was on board flight 11? 6.3 Bush Speech Writers Grossly Inflate Number of Israeli Casualties 6.3.1 Who was Bush’s Speechwriter? 6.4 Mohammed Atta Leads Us Directly To Jewish Crime Network Doorstep 6.5 Al Qaeda = Mossad Playing Dress Up 6.6 Netanyahu Openly Gleeful of 9/11 Terror Attacks 7 Connected Events 7.1 Zionist would-be terrorist incident at the Mexican Congress Building 7.2 2001 Anthrax attacks 8 Advocates 8.1 Hamid Gul 8.2 Victor Thorn 8.3 Francesco Cossiga 8.4 Kevin Barrett 8.5 Alan Sabrosky 8.6 Louis Farrakhan 8.7 Kees van der Pijl 9 US Deep state involvement 10 See Also 11 Related Quotations 12 Related Documents 13 References One of the first operational steps in preparation for the 9/11 attacks would have been to secure control of the World Trade Centre Complex itself. This is crucial because without complete control, the setting of explosives to bring down the towers would be next to impossible without serious risk of discovery. Four key Zionist Network assets Larry Silverstein, who made billions of dollars from the attacks Frank Lowy Ronald Lauder Lewis Eisenberg Larry Silverstein – is a Jewish American businessman from New York. Silverstein obtained a 99 year lease on the entire world trade center complex on 24 July, 2001. The towers were in fact close to worthless, being filled with asbestos,[8] yet Silverstein “felt a compelling urge to own them” and took out specific insurance against acts of “terrorism”. Silverstein had breakfast in “Windows on the World” restaurant (located in North Tower 107th Floor) every morning. [9] but broke this routine on the morning of 11 September 2001. Silverstein’s two children, who also worked in the WTC, were also absent from work that day. Larry Silverstein was paid $4.55 billion in insurance money as a result of the destruction of the WTC complex[10]. He also sued the airlines and airport security, seeking $12.3 billion in damages, though his ultimate payout after a 13 year legal battle was just $95.2 million.[11] Silverstein was a personal friend of media-magnate Rupert Murdoch and former Israeli prime minister Ariel Sharon. Haaretz reported that he was such good friends with Benjamin Netanyahu that he spoke with him on the phone every Sunday.[12]…

UK air traffic control goes down – Israeli hack? MoD denies ‘military jet’ error caused air traffic control outage The Ministry of Defence has denied making any errors amid reports that data entered by a military jet was behind the air traffic control system failure which threw UK airports into chaos. A technical issue at National Air Traffic Services (Nats) on Tuesday led to more than 2,000 flights arriving or departing the UK to be cancelled, and the disruption continued into Wednesday. The Financial Times reported on Friday that it had been told by four sources that a flight plan submitted by a military aircraft triggered events that led to the outage. It claimed the entry caused a glitch within the wider air traffic control system that took hours to restart. The Ministry of Defence has denied making any errors amid reports that data entered by a military jet was behind the air traffic control system failure which threw UK airports into chaos. An MOD spokesperson said: “We do not believe there’s any indication of an error on the part of the military. “Because it’s subject to a live Nats investigation, which is expected to conclude next week, it would be inappropriate for us to comment any further while that investigation is ongoing.” A Nats spokesperson said: “We are continuing to investigate the underlying cause. “It would be wrong to speculate while that work continues, and a full technical investigation will follow.” The disruption has prompted calls for Martin Rolfe, chief executive of Nats, to resign. Mr Rolfe apologised for the incident, which he said he took “full responsibility” for. Michael O’Leary, the boss of budget airline Ryanair, called Mr Rolfe’s position “untenable” earlier this week. Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander told MPs on Wednesday afternoon that she did not believe the air traffic control issue was “unavoidable”. A Wizz Air spokesperson said the airline is “extremely disappointed” that a Nats technical failure caused the widespread disruption, adding: “Nats is simply not fit for purpose in its current form.” In August 2023, more than 700,000 passengers suffered disruption when flights were grounded at UK airports when Nats suffered a technical glitch while processing a flight plan.

Nazis developed both nuclear weapons | & MK ULTRA brainwashed assassins for USA | Israel behind the 7/7 London Bombings: Tony Gosling’s documentary, and article | Videos of full shows | Economic essentials: Michael Hudson | Blackrock/Vanguard | Why/how Israel Assassinated JFK & RFK | Operation Gladio | Tony on Brexit & (4th Reich) Traitors of Arnhem | Creation vs. Evolution | God vs. Lucifer | ‘Great Plan’ for 3 World Wars | Devil Worship: The Rise Of Satanism | Nuclear Armed IDF Doomsday Cult | Aanirfan | Armageddonists I have known: Nick Land (1976-8) | George Monbiot (1995-7) | Manna for the Revelation Generation: CONSPIRACY CLASSICS, longer interviews/lectures

Part Two – International news review, Accelerationist, Armageddonist reports and investigations

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XkHGD-Ac4r8

Funeral of David Halpin this week. The anomalies in the official ‘suicide’ story of David Kelly, as studied by David Halpin [VIDEO]. We are sad to hear of the passing of David Halpin. He was stalwart supporter of the Palestinian people. The things he witnessed in Gaza when he worked there as a trauma surgeon stayed with him throughout his life. He started the original ‘Gaza flotilla’ attempting to sail 2 boats with medical supplies and food in them to Gaza over 20 years ago. He truly was a remarkable person To the Attorney-General of the UK The Rt.Hon Richard Hermer KC re: the absence of a proper inquest into the death of David Kelly CMG DSc in July 2003 Dear Lord Hermer First, I would like to offer my congratulations on your recent appointment to the post of Attorney-General. I write to you in this regard. On 17 February 2009 you invited me, together with some other doctors, to visit you at Doughty Street chambers to discuss the death of Dr David Kelly. We set out our concerns about the manner in which the state had dealt with this tragedy and explained to you our doubts that it was investigated rigorously. As you know, the coroner’s inquest into Dr Kelly’s death was – uniquely – subsumed into the ad hoc inquiry chaired by Lord Hutton, who concluded that Dr Kelly took his own life in July 2003. This is the only time in British legal history that a coroner’s inquest into a single death has been adjourned using Section 17A of the 1988 Coroners Act so that a non-statutory public inquiry could be held instead. The lawful process of the opening of a coroner’s inquest did not happen. The cart was put before a well tried and respected horse. Careful analysis over many years by the group of doctors of which I was a member – plus the work of various lawyers, parliamentarians and investigative journalists – has found how woefully inadequate Lord Hutton’s non-statutory public inquiry was. To name just a handful of its deficiencies: Lord Hutton failed to call key witnesses to give evidence to his inquiry; yet those witnesses who were called were not required to give evidence on oath. We now know that there were no fingerprints on the knife Kelly allegedly used to end his life – even though he wasn’t wearing gloves on the day his body was found. (This was never mentioned at the Hutton Inquiry even though it was known to Thames Valley Police at the time the Hutton Inquiry hearings took place). Lord Hutton spent only half a day of the 24 days on which his inquiry sat examining the medical evidence relating to Dr Kelly’s death. And Lord Hutton failed to consider the crucial matter – incumbent upon every coroner – of whether Dr Kelly intended to commit suicide. I must stress that the above list is not exhaustive. It is designed to underscore the point that, legally speaking, Lord Hutton’s ad hoc inquiry was less independent and less thorough than a coroner’s inquest would have been, with disastrous results. The high bar that a coroner would have had to clear in order to reach a suicide finding in the matter of Dr Kelly’s death was simply absent from the Hutton Inquiry. When we met you at your chambers in 2009, we were being helped pro bono by Leigh Day & Co. Knowing you to be a man of truth and integrity, Frances Swaine, of that firm, advised us to consult you. Your sympathetic view was that we should focus on the first cause of death advanced by Lord Hutton – “haemorrhage from a cut left ulnar artery” – as originally written by a Home Office pathologist, Dr Nicholas Hunt, and also to judicially review the then Attorney General, Baroness Scotland, rather than JR her refusal to instigate an inquest. You may know that with wide public support a hearing was eventually held at the High Court in December 2011 – Halpin v Regina. In total, about five hours were spent in plea and defence. At the hearing’s conclusion, Mr Justice Nicol read out from 19 pages of text and determined that the Attorney General of the day – Dominic Grieve – had been right to refuse an inquest into Dr Kelly’s death in 2011. And there, the matter of Dr Kelly’s unnatural death has most unsatisfactorily remained, for Mr Grieve’s decision was no more than a distant echo of Lord Hutton’s original finding. I am aware that Britain’s legal system is facing many crises, especially in the criminal and family justice courts and in terms of prison capacity. Yet public trust in our country’s law enforcement, and what follows in the courts, has withered. Specifically, many British citizens – including some Appeal Court judges – do not believe that Dr Kelly’s death was adequately investigated at Lord Hutton’s inquiry. This has left a cloud of suspicion hanging over this troubling and vital matter. For this reason I am calling upon you to kindly consider allowing a full coroner’s inquest into Dr Kelly’s death to be held in order to resolve this situation for once and for all. My understanding is that you alone as Attorney-General, has the power to do this. I revere ‘the law’ and quote from your speech of yesterday in the Royal Courts of Justice. “Being in government is a privilege that carries the responsibility of having to make hard choices but as we face the challenging path ahead the rule of law will be the lodestar for this government.” * Yours sincerely, David Halpin MB BS FRCS Dartmoor

Trump to give everyone $5,000 if they vote for him!? US President Donald Trump has offered every adult American $5,000 (£3,700) if Republicans win November’s midterm elections, but it is unclear how such a plan would be funded and whether it is legal. His remarks prompted raucous applause from supporters at a party convention on Wednesday night, although Democrats labelled it an “empty promise”. Trump also told the Republican conference that the money would have to be spent in the US, but it is unclear how that would be monitored. US Vice-President JD Vance suggested it might be paid for by tariff revenue and that such cheques would not go to wealthy Americans.

Craig Murray on control of the Straits of Hormuz. Will Strait of Hormuz Stay Closed? Craig Murray on Iran’s Leverage Deep Dive Perspective Will the Strait of Hormuz stay closed — and why does former British Ambassador Craig Murray say that closure proves Iran is a civilization the US cannot conquer? In this deep-dive interview, Craig Murray joins Deep Dive Perspective to assess two years of war in Gaza, Lebanon, Yemen and Iran, and explains why — in his view — the US/Israeli campaign against Iran has failed to achieve regime change. Drawing on his experience as former UK Ambassador to Uzbekistan and his recent time on the ground in Lebanon, Murray argues that Western elites misread Iran by listening to exiles and Gulf clients, and underestimated Iranian national cohesion after the recent 12-day war and the history of the 1953 Mossad/CIA intervention. Murray contends that Donald Trump’s response — including threats of sweeping sanctions on anyone trading with Iran — reflects a mercantilist worldview focused on physical control of trade, ports and shipping rather than free trade. In Murray’s analysis, closing the Strait of Hormuz hurts Asian economies that depend on Gulf oil while doing little direct damage to the US, which he presents as part of a deliberate strategy to damage China, India and other competitors. He further alleges — as his own estimate, not a verified fact — that market volatility around negotiations has been exploited for personal financial gain through oil futures, citing trades placed in the half-hour before announcements. These are the guest’s allegations and interpretations. The conversation also examines Iran’s resistance economy after decades of sanctions, why Murray believes Iran can build a resilient, sanctions-proof industrial base for its 90-million-person market with access to Pakistan and neighboring states, the role of Dubai as an alleged sanctions-busting entrepot, parallels with Venezuela’s domestic pharmaceutical production, and why predictions that Saudi desert pipelines will strip Iran of leverage ignore — in Murray’s view — Yemeni resistance in the Bab el-Mandeb and potential Iran-China pipeline corridors via Afghanistan. The discussion closes on what a one-state solution framed to 1946 borders means for Palestine’s endgame. In This Episode: • Why Murray says Iran is a civilization, not a militia — and why it wasn’t defeated like Syria or Venezuela • Strait of Hormuz closure: leverage, global oil prices, and who it really hurts • Mercantilism vs. free trade: Trump’s tariff and port-control worldview • Is China already the world’s economic — and military — superpower? • Dubai as sanctions busting hub: would enforcing sanctions collapse its economy? • Iran’s sanctions-proof economy: minerals, talent, and a 90M market • Pipeline politics: Saudi desert pipelines, Yemen, and the China-Iran corridor 00:00 — Introduction: Craig Murray — From Ambassador to Rights Warrior 02:15 — Gaza, Lebanon, Yemen: Two Years Watching Genocide Up Close 05:40 — Has Iran Been Defeated? A Civilization vs. Empire 09:30 — The 12-Day War: Mossad, Insurgency and Why Regime Change Failed 15:20 — Strait of Hormuz Closed: Trump’s Mercantilist Gamble 22:10 — Hurting China: Why Closure Is Seen as a Feature, Not a Bug 28:45 — Venezuela Parallel: Seizing Oil and Blocking China 33:00 — Dubai: The Worst-Kept Secret of Sanctions Busting 38:20 — Resistance Economies: How Iran and Venezuela Build Self-Sufficiency 44:00 — Pipelines, Yemen and the Guardian Claim About Saudi Leverage Craig Murray is a former British Ambassador to Uzbekistan, author, and human rights campaigner. He has reported extensively from Lebanon and is a frequent commentator on UK foreign policy, the Middle East, and civil liberties. Views expressed are his own.

Russians arrest ‘spy’ in British Embassy in Moscow. Russia arrests ‘spy’ at British Embassy over ‘terror attack to draw UK into war’ Footage shows the alleged ‘spy’ overpowered by masked and armed plain-clothed FSB officers. Vladimir Putin’s FSB security service has detained a “Ukrainian spy” working at the British Embassy in Moscow. The intelligence agency alleged a bizarre plot to stage potentially deadly “acts of sabotage and terrorism” against Ambassador Nigel Casey and other members of the UK’s diplomatic mission. Moscow would be blamed for the attacks, in a “false flag” bid to draw Britain fully into the war against Russia. The bombshell allegations could potentially spark fears the operation is an elaborate FSB stunt aimed at engendering suspicion between Britain and Ukraine, to disrupt a key axis of Kyiv’s defence. Moscow regularly disapprovingly depicts the UK as Ukraine’s staunchest Western ally. A spokesperson for the UK’s Foreign, Commonwealth and Security Office (FCDO) said: “We don’t comment on security matters. It is common that Russian state actors seek to drive wedges between Ukraine and its international partners through disinformation.” Footage shows the alleged 45-year old “spy” – a Russian citizen evidently employed as a security officer at the British Ambassador’s official Residence – as he was violently overpowered by masked and armed plain-clothed FSB officers in Moscow, and thrown facedown on the ground. The video purports to show a confession by the alleged SBU security service in Kyiv. The alleged agent is accused by Russia of supplying a security and military linked Ukrainian blogger Dmytro ‘Apostle’ Karpenko with secret details about diplomats and their movements. The purported “confession” shows the unnamed detainee claiming “the Ukrainian authorities were very interested in the information for the purpose of carrying out acts of sabotage against the British Ambassador, the Embassy, and the British Residence in Moscow”. Article continues below ADVERTISEMENT The detainee is shown on the FSB video saying: “I was a member of the security staff at the British Embassy in Moscow. Article continues below ADVERTISEMENT “Specifically, I handled security duties at the British Ambassador’s Residence in Moscow.” This is one of Moscow’s most prominent diplomatic buildings directly across Moscow River from the Kremlin. “In January of this year, I contacted Dmitry Karpenko, a Ukrainian blogger and journalist – specifically, a pro-Ukrainian blogger,” the ‘suspect’ alleged. “I told him I worked at the British Embassy in Moscow. “He was very interested in this information – specifically, details about the Ambassador [Nigel Casey], his deputies, other diplomats, and the staff of both the Embassy and the Residence. He wanted their personal details, addresses, and full names. “Information on the vehicles they drove, their movements, the restaurants they visited, and the cities they traveled to; and the arrival and departure times of all staff and diplomats. “He was also extremely interested in the security arrangements – how security and protection were handled at the British Embassy and Residence in Moscow. “This included the access control system, events held on the Residence grounds, and the number of security personnel on duty. “In short, he wanted all information regarding the security of the British Residence and Embassy in Moscow. In the alleged confession, he continued: “When I asked why he needed this, he replied that the Ukrainian authorities were very interested in the information for the purpose of carrying out acts of sabotage against the British Ambassador, the Embassy, and the British Residence in Moscow.” So far, the FSB has offered no direct proof of potentially deadly attacks targeting Britain’s ambassador and other diplomats. The suspect has been charged with high treason under Article 275, which can carry life imprisonment. It is understood he was employed by an outside organisation providing security to the embassy and not by the British government directly Russian state news agency TASS claimed: “The Kyiv regime, in order to preserve itself, is ready to resort to sabotage and terrorist acts against its strategic allies.” The FSB urged Russian citizens to refrain from any contact with pro-Ukrainian bloggers. When he arrived in Moscow in 2023, Casey, 57, made a video appeal from his Residence, with the Kremlin visible, calling for the “ending the human suffering caused by Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rKggTxdaIYA

Christopher Bollyn, author of ‘Solving 9/11’, on the Oded Yinon Plan to balkanise Middle East for Israel’s benefit. Eight years have passed since the terror atrocities of September 11, 2001, heinous false-flag terror crimes which took the lives of thousands of innocent people and led to drastic changes in the United States and around the world [VIDEO]. Although the terror attacks have yet to be properly investigated and prosecuted by the federal government, we now have scientific evidence that proves that the official explanation is nothing but a pack of lies, a massive deception foisted on the public by corrupt government officials and the controlled media. Most significantly, this deception was promoted by officials and media owners who knew it to be false. The U.S. Department of Justice, for example, oversaw the destruction of many tons of structural steel – crucial evidence from the crime scenes. On one hand, the government and media have intentionally pushed a fabrication that a band of Islamic terrorists hijacked airplanes and flew them into the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, causing the complete destruction and pulverization of two 110-story towers and a 47- story building in lower Manhattan. Using this deception, the federal government and its agents have created a police state in the United States and forced Americans and other Western nations to participate in an utterly fraudulent “War on Terror,” waging illegal wars of aggression and occupation in the Middle East, Central Asia, and Africa. Untold thousands have died in these illegal wars of aggression. On the other hand, we have scientific evidence that the Twin Towers were blown up with an advanced form of super-thermite, chips of which were found in five different samples of the dust from the demolished towers by Dr. Steven E. Jones of Brigham Young University. This crucial Bollyn.com discovery, published as a peer-reviewed paper in March 2009 with other scientists, completely disproves the official version that the Twin Towers fell as a result of fires caused by the plane crashes. This discovery also explains the explosive destruction and pulverization of the immense steel-frame and concrete buildings. As Professor Jones says, “The data doesn’t lie.” Rather than addressing the evidence that the World Trade Center was demolished with explosives, however, the new administration of President Barack Obama continues to use the 9- 11 deception to increase the war effort in Afghanistan, occupying a nation that had nothing to do with the terror attacks in the United States. Neither Osama Bin Laden nor the Taliban had anything to do with the demolition of the World Trade Center, which the evidence proves was carried out using an advanced form of Thermite created using nano-technology. Nor did the airplane crashes themselves cause the towers to collapse. The plane crashes were merely part of the deception, meant to provide a plausible explanation for the pre-planned explosive demolitions that followed. This is why 2009 is such a crucial year for 9-11 truth. A modern republic like the United States cannot continue for very long as a free nation with a government and media that lie to the people about the murder of thousands of its citizens and illegal wars supposedly waged on their behalf. This is clearly a state in the process of a revolutionary change. The American people will not tolerate a police state using such outrageous lies to rob them of their money and freedom. “We are not afraid to entrust the American people with unpleasant facts,” President John F. Kennedy said in 1962. “For a nation that is afraid to let its people judge the truth and falsehood in an open market is a nation that is afraid of its people.” So, who is really afraid of unpleasant facts and the truth of 9-11? It is not the people, but the culprits of the terror atrocity and the subsequent cover-up who fear the truth. My work provides some of the unpleasant but essential facts about 9-11. It represents eight years of work and is dedicated to the truth and the people who died on that day. It is unacceptable that their deaths, and the suffering of their families, have been exploited to deceive the world and wage illegal wars. Christopher Bollyn Labor Day, 2009

Michael Hudson on the West’s financial corrupt system forcing us in to WW3. Michael Hudson: Destiny of Civilization – Fractionalisation & Collapse Glenn Diesen Prof. Michael Hudson, a world-renowned classical economist, discusses his book on how economies financialise and die. The Destiny of Civilisation – Socialism uh was viewed as uh the next stage of industrial capitalism. Uh in the late 19th century, not only Marx was talking about socialism, there were all sorts of kinds of socialism. There was Christian socialism, there was anarchist socialism, there was social democracy. And what everybody was in agreement all of the vested interests was you needed uh an governments to play an added role in the economy to provide basic needs at subsidized prices and uh it was the America’s first economics professor at the first business school the Wharton school u that uh said Simon Patton said that Public infrastructure is a fourth factor of production besides labor, capital, and land, which really isn’t a factor of production, but uh rent extraction. Uh and but public infrastructure doesn’t aim at making a profit. It aims at minimizing the price of basic needs so that uh labor can doesn’t have to u cover these costs and employers can uh won’t have to pay for these costs because public investment is more productive and less highpriced than private investment because uh the aim of public uh infrastructure canals, railroads u public uh is not to make a profit, it’s to make the economy profitable. Well, it was the conservative prime minister Benjamin Draeli in Britain that said health, public health, that’s the center of things. And it was Draeli that promoted public health as opposed to the the United States under President Obama that says we’ve got to privatize public health. and uh the American medical associations as ever since the 1950s fighting we’re against socialized medicine. Well, uh it ends up that uh that uh instead of socialized medicine taking over the medical practice of doctors, the private health insurance companies have taken over what doctors can do uh here and pressed uh the uh cost of medical uh care to 20% of GDP. Well, this is far in excess of what other countries from Europe to uh China do. China offers public health and also free public education as England uh did for a long time and as many European countries did. But now it’s very expensive everywhere from uh over 50,000 a year at least in the United States to high prices for English uh Australian and other Western uh English-speaking universities and I guess in uh uh German universities. All of these functions that were supposed to create a competitive lowpriced economy are uh now being privatized, high-priced and uh countries such as China and Russia are uh keeping the price of basic needs low and they’re doing what is supposedly what democracies are supposed to do. The Americans say we’re democracy against autocracy. But that’s not what this fight is all about. It’s against Western oligarchy versus uh socialism uh state uh in in industrial capitalism with a strong public uh subsidy. uh and uh this subsidy prevents an uh a financial oligarchy from developing because what China has done and going further than the socialist movements have advocated in uh in the west is to say money is a public utility and we’re creating money and credit to the people’s bank of China to uh not to uh finance corporate takeovers and making money uh financially by financial engineering We’re using money and credit to finance actual construction. Well, they’ve over financed housing construction obviously, but they’ve also financed their industry. They financed their wind farms. Uh they’re financing their uh basic uh research or at least providing uh government uh subsidy and support for private enterprise. Uh doing all of these there’s a mixed economy. Every successful civilization in history has been a mixed economy.

Radio4All download pages
COMPLETE SHOW AND FULL INTERVIEWS [right click to download]
#1 –
Complete 4hr show – [right click to download]
Full interviews with…
#2 – Peter Oborne: Britain has FINALLY stood up to Israel – 00:12:00
#3 – Lord Levy: on Miliband decision to sanction Israel over West Bank illegal settler violence – 00:06:00
#4 – Matt Jukes: Met Deputy Chief on Danny Tommos Balaclava-Clad Protests Sinister Intimidating – 00:15:00
#5 – Martin Rolfe: NATS boss, on outage possible Israeli hack of UK Air Traffic Control network – 00:05:00
#6 – Craig Murray: ex FO maritime law chief asks, Will Strait of Hormuz Stay Closed – 00:50:00
#7 – Michael Hudson, Destiny of Civilization Financialization Collapse Glenn Diesen – 00:50:00
#8 – Ed Miliband gives statement on UK sanctions on Israel Palestine over West Bank settler violence – 02:10:00

Tony’s paperback and eBooks Traitors Of Arnhem, Siege Of Heaven; Siege Of Heaven Reader – all available for donation, or to buy, via www.bilderberg.org

The Bristol Politics Show CANCELLED and attempts to intimidate us

July 2024 – Tony, Dave and Martin’s NOT The BCfm Politics show was CANCELLED/EVICTED from their PRSC studio in a no fault, no notice, no appeal, eviction by Chloe Slater of The People’s Republic of Stokes Croft (PRSC) arts centre – An email from Chloe and Keith Cowling explained that: ‘Transphobic’ leaflets, which we were not shown, had been left in the building by a recent guest (who denied it) making Transsexual users of the building feel ‘offended’ and ‘unsafe’. To quote: ‘Please let us know when you or Dave would like to come and retrieve your equipment and drop off your keys. Kind regards’ PRSC Directors (Keith Cowling, chair) PRSC / Stokes Croft China 17-35 Jamaica St Bristol BS2 8JP. Chloe Slater (formerly young man Jez and now self-defined as ‘she’) also made it difficult for us to retrieve the last of our equipment by inferring we couldn’t be trusted, we were made to wait in the cold outside their building for over 30 minutes to return their mixing desk and retrieve our remaining kit in December 2024. 

[UPDATE channel restored by YT in July 2025] October 2022 – Tony’s Public Enquiry Channel opened in March 2008, with 13 million views, over 1,600 videos and 26,000 subscribers is removed under false pretences by YouTube – A video Tony recorded in New Zealand ‘Bill Gates, ID2020 & Revelation: Quaker Tony Gosling on Covid 19 & the Bible’ and uploaded on 8th April 2020 got a ‘third strike’ but YouTube’s ‘medical misinformation’ regime was introduced in September 2021 so should not have included as ‘strikes’ videos uploaded before that date.  Documentary makers are just about the only public interest investigators left in the NATO zone. From the top down, our mainstream media, police, political parties & intelligence services are being compromised by feudal banksters, secret societies and the mafia. Key people intimidated by psychopathic black magic types and their pliable drones who will even kill to take over positions of power? Just search for “John Scarlett” and “Dodgy Dossier” and you’ll see what I mean. The Zionists are every bit as fundamentalist and twisted as the leaders and followers of ISIS. Register here and join us in the discussion as we wriggle free of the psychopaths, back to sanity http://www.911forum.org.uk

March 2020 – BCfm’s weekly Politics Show presented by Tony Gosling with Irish Republican Labour activist Martin Summers was forced off FM, now online only by station manager Pat Hart. He decided the show should be ‘rested, due to the pandemic’ on 24 March 2020 and then refused to communicate at all when we requested to do the show remotely. Bristol Community FM (BCfm) charity ‘CEO’ Patrick Hart is a long-time personal friend of Bristol’s all-powerful right-wing ‘Labour’ mayor Marvin Rees. Pat Hart has a private property portfolio on the continent and also does Public Relations work for property speculators who are taking over community facilities such as Redfield Cinema. Now on Internet only NOT The BCfm Politics Show is available 17:00-c. 20:00 live on Fridays. Pat Hart replaced us with a dumbed-down student show repeating MSM stories called The Bristol Agenda. If you’d like to share your views on his deliberate dumbing-down and pro-Covid jab mismanagement you can contact UK broadcasting regulator Ofcom or BCfm board chair and the ‘Don’ himself, here.

February 2019 – Ofcom complaint result: UKLFI exposed as creation of Israeli foreign ministry – Bristol Post article: BCfm cleared after being reported to Ofcom for anti-semitic conspiracy theories – It could have resulted in BCfm radio station being shut down if the complaint was upheld Tony Gosling reported to Ofcom by UK Lawyers for Israel after being accused of anti-semitism A Bristol radio station, which had one of its programmes reported for anti-semitism and racism has been cleared by Ofcom. The radio regulatory body received a complaint from “UK Lawyers for Israel’ over a show on BCfm radio, hosted by investigative journalist Tony Gosling. The weekly politics show, on the popular community radio station based in Easton, was reported for several allegations on a show which aired on November 23. Tony Gosling, who was a former BBC journalist between 1989 and 1993, has been producing and presenting ‘The Tony Gosling Politics’ show every week on BCFM radio for 11 years. They have released a statement which reads: “Whilst we are supportive of all our volunteer presenters, The Tony Gosling Politics Show only represents approximately ten percent of our political output content wise, and less than two per cent of our entire weekly output.” Mr Gosling’s programme looks at local politics and he interviews a range of councillors and MPs in the city. The show is also perhaps more well known for its alternative look at international politics, and he has a cult following online from across the world. Mr Gosling has made regular appearances on national media including the politics show with Andrew Neil on BBC One, and international channels such as Russia Today, Channel1 Russia, NTV, and recently for both Turkish and Lebanon TV.

November 2012 – Tony gets death threats on the phone from the Jewish Defence League – ‘you’re a dead man walking’ – a man calls him and Tony records the call. Audio of UK Jewish Defence League (JDL) death threat against British journalist Tony Gosling (2012) – Avon and Somerset police Special Branch investigate, trace the caller, and after six months report to Tony that the individual has been served a caution that they will proceed with a prosecution for harassment under the 1861 offences against the person act. Seems pretty clear this death threat was issued alongside the lies, copied below, which were published on their blog by London based UK JDL in November 2012.  Firstly Tony Gosling is not a ‘homophobe’. That accusation was first made in an article published by the ‘Harry’s Place’ blog, penned by Zionist David Toube and propelled by him anonymously into Private Eye in 2008. It refers to Gosling’s criticism of senior teachers at Bannerman Road Primary school in Bristol who used homosexual early learning picture books against the express wishes of the parent governors. His criticism was about the deception by teaching staff not because of the homosexual content of the books. Secondly, if you follow the JDL link you’ll find what Tony Gosling actually says about the ‘Protocols Of The Learned Elders Of Zion’ says “…I don’t think there is much doubt that the Protocols are fake…” Thirdly he is not a member of Bristol Palestine Solidarity Campaign and has never been to any of their meetings.

Autumn 2014 – Tony’s documentary production and distribution business shut down by its bank. Our thriving Co-op business bank account ordered closed for undisclosed reasons. Tony Gosling and Ben Edwards founded i-Contact Video Network to distribute documentaries on VHS video and DVD and to make their own documentaries as well as attend news events and sell video footage to TV news channels. Amongst the films we distributed were Operation Solstice, Coconut Revolution, Mark Purdey and Organophosphates, McLibel, 9/11 In Plane Site, Ludicrous Diversion and The Battle of Trafalgar. These, plus books, and even a board game about drug dealing ‘Dollars and Dibble’, were all available via mail order and we supplied libraries around the world too. The bank had clearly been ordered to investigate us for money laundering, although they never admitted it. All the questions they asked Ben and I were about proving our identity through passports etc.. When we did, yet more letters kept arriving demanding more proofs, birth certificates etc. and eventually when one of us missed supplying the required information, within a week or so of being asked, the account was summarily closed and we got a cheque made out to one of us with the few hundred pounds that was in the business bank account. Since neither of us could get a business bank account up and running for at least a few months and the bank account meant nobody could any longer use the website, we made the reluctant decision to shut it down. Thus was a thriving business killed off by the Co_operative bank. Having said that, co-op were not quite the worst. We did apply to open an account at Bristol’s ‘ethical’ Triodos bank, who proceeded to string us along for several months and then said our business was too risky for them to provide an account!