The Bristol Politics Show

MP3 of Friday 11th September 2026 show [right click to download] (from c. 11pm) This week’s full interview mp3s, bottom of page. SHOW STARTS 17:00 London time FOR c. 4 HRS TO c. 20:50 – OUR LIVE STREAM to Listen live online. Alt. live stream, DJ Plug Radio OR Download Show After Transmission HERE. Repeats 11 & 5 AM & PM daily on our stream
Download NOT THE BCFM POLITICS SHOW APP [ANDROID APP (1)] and [APKPURE (2)] – or the [Apple App store] – PS. You can replace evil Google Play, which effectively banned us, with [the Aurora store]
All time low: 31% trust the UK Press – UK media oligopoly TONY’S BOOKS: Bilderberg.org – 2 PAPER–BACKS – TONY’S CHANNELS: Telegram – Bitchute – 911 forum – Radio4All – The Land Is Ours – VK – Twitter/X – Farcebook – Brighteon – Rumble – RT Live on Rumble –  Goebbelsesque YouTube: This show; Public Enquiry; Peter Borenius; i-Contact & Occult Geopolitics

Radio4All mp3 audio files usually available from 23:00 2-4hrs, after TX – we’ll credit you if you rebroadcast. Any probs. mp3s should be on alternative links below by then

Part One – Local and National News Review

25th Anniversary of 9/11. Ian Henshall, author of ‘9/11: The New Evidence’, joins Tony and Martin online. He explains the anomalies of the official story of 9/11. The original 9/11 Revealed attracted lavish praise from reviewers in the Daily Mail and Sunday Times for the ‘huge gaps’ it exposed in the official 9/11 story. It became a non-fiction bestseller despite a wall of silence by the broadcast media and condemnation in a special web page set up by the US State Department. Since then the story has produced many sinister new twists, including: Pentagon whistleblowers have accused the ‘Independent 9/11 Commission’ of lying; long-suppressed eyewitness testimony has been released confirming multiple explosions in the Twin Towers before and during their collapses; the much vaunted video purporting to prove that Flight 77 hit the Pentagon showed nothing at all; and an analysis of terrorist trials and arrests since 2001 indicates that far from the ‘600 Al Qaeda sleeper cells in the US’ (CIA) there were none at all. In this sequel to 9/11 Revealed, Ian Henshall examines the precedents of black operations by the US/UK, from Northern Ireland to Italy, from Vietnam to Kosovo; he looks at the various 9/11 theories, including the latest twists in the official story, and tests them against the evidence. Finally, he asks what might happen when the storm of popular outrage collides with the regime in Washington and London and outlines the radical changes needed if Washington and London are ever again to function as genuine democracies. In this expanded version of ‘9/11 Revealed’ Ian Henshall examines the precedents of black operations by the US/UK, from Northern Ireland to Italy, from Vietnam to Kosovo; he looks at the various 9/11 theories, including the latest twists in the official story, and tests them against the evidence. An eminent analysis of the 9/11 attacks are the works of David Ray Griffin. However, this book contains excellent graphic material (contradicting the official version of the facts) and sketches a good overall framework (`the big picture’). On our planet, the top third of its inhabitants enjoy a relative prosperity often based on overwork, while the rest lives in traditional poverty or in a real living hell. Within the top third, a plutocracy, a Global Dominance Group of some 200 people (P. Phillips), pulls the strings in the ongoing fight for wealth and power in the western world, helped by governments, the media conglomerates and the military and intelligence communities controlled by it. After the fall of the Berlin Wall, the oligarchy needed a new enemy for the consolidation and the expansion of its power base. Communism was replaced by terrorism. Ian Henshall sees the `war on terror’ as a tactical weapon in the fight for the extension of the wealth and power of the plutocrats. After the 9/11 attacks centuries-old democratic rights were hollowed out. The presidential power was enhanced by giving the president the right to override the Constitution in times of war (on terror). But, the author also sees a Washington oligarchy confronted with a crisis of unpopularity. Moreover, only 16 % of the US population believes the entire official version of the 9/11 massacre. He rightly calls for a major criminal investigation by an independent Criminal Commission of all aspects of the events.

Operation Gladio: NATO history of false flag attacks. Daniele Ganser book. Richard Cotterell book. For the past 40 years, teams of secret agents have bombed and murdered scores of innocent civilians to keep control of Europe for their political masters. Developed from “stay behinds”–Nazis who remained in occupied territories at the end of World War 2 to resist the communist threat–this secret network changed from being defenders of state security into attackers of the established political order. It’s only since the Gladio’s existence was acknowledged in 1990 that the impact of its shadowy role in post-war Europe has emerged This fascinating new study shows how the CIA and the British secret service, in collaboration with the military alliance NATO and European military secret services, set up a network of clandestine anti-communist armies in Western Europe after World War II. These secret soldiers were trained on remote islands in the Mediterranean and in unorthodox warfare centres in England and in the United States by the Green Berets and SAS Special Forces. The network was armed with explosives, machine guns and high-tech communication equipment hidden in underground bunkers and secret arms caches in forests and mountain meadows. In some countries the secret army linked up with right-wing terrorist who in a secret war engaged in political manipulation, harrassement of left wing parties, massacres, coup d’états and torture. Codenamed ‘Gladio’ (‘the sword’), the Italian secret army was exposed in 1990 by Italian Prime Minister Giulio Andreotti to the Italian Senate, whereupon the press spoke of “The best kept, and most damaging, political-military secret since World War II” (Observer, 18. November 1990) and observed that “The story seems straight from the pages of a political thriller.” (The Times, November 19, 1990). Ever since, so-called ‘stay-behind’ armies of NATO have also been discovered in France, Spain, Portugal, Germany, Belgium, the Netherlands, Luxemburg, Denmark, Norway, Sweden, Finland, Switzerland, Austria, Greece and Turkey. They were internationally coordinated by the Pentagon and NATO and had their last known meeting in the NATO-linked Allied Clandestine Committee (ACC) in Brussels in October 1990. A seminal work in which Danielle Ganser provides us with the coordinates to help us put things like the so-called War On Terror into their proper contexts. He shows that the majority (if not all) of the western European governments, supposedly democratic in nature, have engaged in activities which can only be described as undemocratic since the end of WWII. The necessity to “prevent the spread of Communism” is an invalid question when examined from the standpoint of the democratic will; for if the majority favour Communism then, theoretically, that is what democracy is all about. And there can be no question of degrees; democracy either exists or it does not. Like free speech, you cannot have democracy up to a point. That there has since the 1990s been little public accountability (despite public acknowledgement that the activities did take place) raises crucially important questions about the validity of the War On Terror, British involvement in Northern Ireland and elsewhere, and many other similar occupations and internal conflicts as well as many of the events which have been attributed to “terrorists” over the past decade or so. For not only do we not know that the countries involved actually dismantled the stay-behind armies in the 1990s, we don’t know which countries ran stay-behind armies in each others’ countries – and whether these were likewise dismantled. In fact, the main protagonists (the UK & USA) have so far refused to comment. Whilst many would argue that this is essential to protect national security, this argument, when examined logically, is baseless. For if we truly do live in democracies then no government should be above the law. And when supposedly-demoractic governments encourage – or turn a blind eye to – actions which are undeniably anti-democratic then it would seem to stand to reason that we actually don’t live in democracies at all. Danielle Ganser has added one more link into an ever-strengthening chain of evidence that democracy truly does not exist. A truly disturbing story; this is history that everyone should know.

Webster Tarpley. This book is probably the most concise and well researched book on the 911 conspiracy. Exploring all relevant angles to the story, this book in my opinion is an awesome asset to someone who has already “woken up” to the myth of the “official” version of events. I would therefore recommend this to intellects and would recommend other easier read books to those just exploring for the first time the false claims of the official story about 911. For the average guy on the street, no doubt this book is interesting – but boy, is it hard going! For those already aware of the false “facts” about 911 and already interested an absolute MUST BUY as it really is the greatest compendium about 911. For those who are just interested – buy something like Paul Joseph Watsons “Order out of Chaos” to whet your apetite. For Tarpley, terrorism is synthetic: composed by patsies lead by deception, moles, professionals, mediamen, controllers. It is sponsored by states, organized and directed by a rogue network of high government, intelligence and military officials together with foreign agencies. It is controlled by an aggressive, imperialistic, murderous oligarchy/plutocracy, which restlessly seeks to preserve its privileges through conflict and confrontation: war, violence, hatred, coups, martial law, terrorism, manipulation. The dollar’s reserve status is the true heart of US international arrogance. It was attacked by Saddam Hussein, when he asked to be paid in euros for his oil. Another very serious threat is secular Arab nationalism, which could overthrow loyal fundamentalist Islamic regimes in the Middle East. Progressive nationalists in the Arab world are and have been relentlessly victims of terrorist attacks. His analysis of the 9/11 events is profound: options insider trading, the collapse of three towers while only two where hit, planes flown by remote control?, who were the hijackers? Are some still alive?, no scrambling of the planes!). It is partly based on the books of Nafeez Mosaddeq Ahmed, Michel Chossudovsky, Thierry Meyssan and David Ray Griffin). Tarpley points courageously his finger at financiers, top-level bureaucrats, flag-rank military officers, top intelligence officials and technical specialists, calling them ‘technocrats of death’. They profited highly from the 9/11 attacks and created a new world of preventive and pre-emptive war, of first use of nuclear weapons, of unilateral aggression, of barbarian racism and hatred, of the glorification of violence and killing, of force and the threat of force. The advice of the Bush regime to the American people is: ‘Be afraid! Always!’. W. G. Tarpley’s research stands in sharp contrast with the mainstream media, clearly gagged by the powerful and paralyzed by autocensure. They know all too well that truth is dangerous for the masses. Therefore, their key-word is ‘omertà’. This book is a powerful exposé of a world dominated by not democratically controlled, cynical and deadly intelligence networks. A really frightening analysis.

https://youtu.be/rbZsoCuPD-w?t=145

William Rodriguez – janitor. 9/11 – An American Building Maintenance employee for twenty years, responsible for inspection and maintenance at the World Trade Center, who held the master key for the stairs. He was the last person to leave the building on September 11 and has been credited with saving many lives. For his efforts, he received the National Hero Award from the Senate of Puerto Rico. Founder, Hispanic Victims Group. Regarding an explosion in the sub-basement of the World Trade Center North Tower on 9/11, prior to any airplane impact. “When I heard the sound of the explosion, the floor beneath my feet vibrated, the walls started to cracking and it everything started shaking,” said Rodriguez, who was huddled together with at least 14 other people in the office… “Seconds after the first massive explosion below in the basement still rattled the floor, I hear another explosion from way above,” said Rodriguez. “Although I was unaware at the time, this was the airplane hitting the tower, it occurred moments after the first explosion.” But before Rodriguez had time to think, coworker Felipe David stormed into the basement office with severe burns on his face and arms, screaming for help and yelling “explosion! explosion! explosion!” David had been in front of a nearby freight elevator on sub-level 1 about 400 feet from the office when fire burst out of the elevator shaft, causing his injuries. “He was burned terribly,” said Rodriguez. “The skin was hanging off his hands and arms. His injuries couldn’t have come from the airplane above, but only from a massive explosion below. I don’t care what the government says, what scientists say. I saw a man burned terribly form a fire that was caused from an explosion below. “I know there were explosives placed below the trade center. I helped a man to safety who is living proof, living proof the government story is a lie and a cover-up… “I disagree 100% with the government story, ” said Rodriguez. “I met with the 9/11 Commission behind closed doors and they essentially discounted everything I said regarding the use of explosives to bring down the north tower. “And I contacted NIST previously four times without a response. Finally, this week I asked them before they came up with their conclusion that jet fuel brought down the towers, if they ever considered my statements or the statements of an other survivors who heard explosions. They just stared at me with blank faces and didn’t have an answers. William Rodriguez, formerly an American Building Maintenance employee for twenty years, was responsible for inspection and maintenance at the World Trade Center and held the master key for the stairs, He was the last person to leave the building on September 11 and has been credited with saving many lives. For his efforts, he received the National Hero Award from the Senate of Puerto Rico. Since September 11, Mr. Rodriguez has been very active in all aspects of the relief efforts, including the memorial, the federal fund and the charities, as well as appearing before many government officials on such topics. William Rodriguez, janitor with a master key, helped save lives at the World Trade Center on 9/11 Titles are generated by AI from Meta 911 – HE WAS THE JANITOR – And on September 11, 2001 the key in his pocket suddenly became one of the most important keys in America. His name was William Rodriguez. He had worked at the World Trade Center for roughly 20 years. That morning, Rodriguez was in the basement of the North Tower when American Airlines Flight 11 struck the building. Chaos erupted. A badly burned man appeared. Rodriguez helped him. Then he could have gotten out. He went back … Because Rodriguez had something almost nobody else in that building had: A MASTER KEY ?? It opened the stairwell doors throughout the North Tower. Firefighters and police were rushing into a building thousands of terrified people were trying to escape. Rodriguez knew the building. And he had the key. So he went UP with the rescuers. Floor after floor. Door after door. Unlock. Open. Keep moving. People were coming down. Rodriguez kept going up. He reportedly made it as high as the 39th floor before firefighters ordered him to turn around. Think about that. The building had been struck by a passenger jet. Smoke was spreading. People were desperately trying to get OUT. And the janitor was climbing farther INSIDE. Rodriguez eventually made it back down and survived. But approximately 200 people he knew at the World Trade Center did not. 25 years later he still carries the memories of that morning. And he still has the master key. We remember the firefighters. We remember the police officers. We remember the passengers who fought back. ??We should also remember the janitor with the key. William Rodriguez wasn’t carrying a badge. He wasn’t carrying a weapon. He was carrying something much simpler. A key. And when America was attacked, he used what he had to help save whoever he could. Never forget William Rodriguez.

‘In Plane Sight’ 2004 documentary. 9/11 In Plane Sight – The Director’s Cut by Dave Vonkleist (2004) 911 in Plane Site – The Director’s Cut I’ve written reviews of a lot of 9/11 related DVDs. Some sought to explain the science behind why the towers fell. Some put faces to the names of the victims, from civilians to emergency personnel. And some try to turn members of the power structure into glowing heroes. But 911: In Plane Site is the first DVD that I’ve seen that asks questions about some of the weird anomalies left amidst the wreckage and debris of that day. The roughly seventy-five minute-long main program is hosted by Dave vonKleist, the plain-talking host of the conspiracy-minded “Power Hour.” VonKleist takes what could in less delicate hands come off as paranoid and deluded and makes it curiously fascinating. This program features no bells or whistles: It simply places the host in front of a bank of monitors and allows him to point out strange contradictions in the generally accepted facts about September 11th. Among these inconsistencies are the size of the hole in the Pentagon’s outer wall (which apparently would not have allowed for a plane of that size), the nature of the damage to the building, and the lack of visible plane debris. VonKleist shows a study released by the American Society of Civil Engineers that leaves out crucial information like reinforced beams in the Pentagon’s walls and the plane’s tail, seemingly negating their findings. He points out clearly visible computers and books that should have been destroyed in the impact but are perfectly fine in the photos. And he plays countless eye-witness reports that make it seem more like a missile hit the Pentagon. He also shows numerous photos of the plane about to strike the south tower of the World Trade Center – images we’ve seen literally thousands of times before – but he points out a strange protrusion on the belly of the plane. This, taken along with eyewitness accounts pulled from news footage claiming that the plane had no windows and no commercial markings, seems to suggest that the plane was actually a military plane. As if things weren’t weird enough, vonKleist points out an instantaneous flash at the front of the plane the moment before it strikes the tower. I figured that this was a reflection glancing off the plane on that sunny day, but vonKleist shows that the flash is visible from four different angles, thanks to the incredible media coverage of the second WTC crash. Then he uses the one known video shot of the first collision (from the Naudet brothers’ 9/11) to show that the flash is present there too.

‘Loose Change’ film. Loose Change II, (2005) Directed by Dylan Avery What really happened on 9/11? 2nd Edition of Loose Change documentary. What if…September 11th was not a surprise attack on America, but rather, a cold and calculated genocide by our own government?We were told that the twin towers were hit by commercial jetliners and subsequently brought down by jet fuel. We were told that the Pentagon was hit by a Boeing 757. We were told that flight 93 crashed in Shanksville, Pennsylvania. We were told that nineteen Arabs from halfway across the globe, acting under orders from Osama Bin Laden, were responsible. What you will see here will prove without a shadow of a doubt that everything you know about 9/11 is a complete fabrication. Conspiracy theory? It’s not a theory if you can prove it.Written and narrated by Dylan Avery, this film presents a rebuttal to the official version of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks and the 9/11 Commission Report. Why it matters… Today’s Freshmen in High School will be learning about the events of September 11th, 2001 as an event that happened before they were born. Yet, the relevance of 9/11 echoes through our lives to this day. It is impossible to avoid the places we as a nation have gone. Scars and open wounds stain our stars and stripes. We must understand that what we were told about that day is a lie and those lies drastically changed the course of peace to a course of perpetual war. How many more people need to die until we realize a reevaluation of the day’s events is needed? Loose Change was created as a voice for the victims of September 11th, 2001, to ask the questions they were robbed of the ability to ask about their fate. A new investigation into the events of that fateful day can give context to the perils we fight today. It’s not too late. Ask questions, demand answers. The film, presented against a synth-pop soundtrack, argues that a small cabal of top-level neocons executed the attacks as a pretext for the invasion of Iraq, the control of Middle Eastern oil fields and a massive increase in American military power. Its lines of argument include the theory that a missile and not a commercial airplane hit the Pentagon, and that United Flight 93 did not crash in Pennsylvania but instead landed safely in Cleveland — or was perhaps blown up or shot down. The filmmakers can’t say for sure. “Loose Change” — the title refers to the idea that political change is on the move — relies on news footage and press reports, including many early-response stories from the hours immediately following the attacks. Comments from witnesses and on-the-scene television reports describing “explosions,” for example, are used to support one of the film’s central theories, that the twin towers were rigged with explosives. “There are some concrete issues that everyone agrees on that are irrefutable,” Avery said in an interview before the screening, ” … and (one of them) is the controlled demolition of the World Trade Center.” By “everyone,” Avery means himself and others in the self-proclaimed “9/11 Truth Movement,” which includes radio hosts, academics and amateur Internet investigators here and abroad.  

Patriot Platform balaclava-clad protests appear at Dover and Portsmouth, Reform UK’s Zia Yusuf being interviewed about protests – then Danny Tommo turns up to take over the live Sky News interview. Protest organiser confronts Zia Yusuf at scene of Portsmouth migrant arrivals The founder of a group of protesters who blocked roads in Dover on Saturday has confronted Reform UK’s Zia Yusuf, telling him his party leader Nigel Farage needs to be “careful with his words”. Daniel Thomas, known as Danny Tommo – who is an associate of ring-wing activist Tommy Robinson, claims to have organised a protest in Dover on Saturday which saw men in black clothing and balaclavas blocking roads. He was also on the scene when migrants arrived in Portsmouth on Sunday. Interrupting Mr Yusuf during an interview in the city, Mr Thomas accused Mr Farage of calling protesters at the Unite the Kingdom rally in London earlier in the year “knuckle-draggers”. He said: “You have to tell Nigel… we had a million people on the streets of London in every colour, every creed, every background, every ethnicity… he called us knuckle-draggers. “I understand Nigel is going to be prime minister one day and I understand he has to set a standard, which will basically be that you know he can’t just come out and say everything’s great and these guys are fantastic, but Nigel needs to be very careful with his words.” Mr Yusuf told Mr Thomas to ensure there was no violence from his group towards the police. Reform UK’s home affairs spokesman said: “I just want to make that really clear, just so that we’re really clear about this, right? There is never any excuse for violence against police officers who are doing their job. They are taking orders, and that is what it is.” Mr Thomas said there was no violence in Dover and, when questioned about his group’s masks and attire being intimidating, said: “The reason people felt potentially intimidated was because of the faces covered. I’ve made that point very clear. “The only reason they’ve done that is because no-one wants to be labelled far right.” Mr Thomas founded the group Patriot Platform in July, promoting it as a project to build “a mighty patriotic army”, partly to push back against migrants arriving in the UK by small boat. Mr Thomas has openly recruited supporters using social media, but his protest action planned at Dover appears to have come as a surprise to the authorities, with Kent Police claiming it was “spontaneous”. Livestreaming while standing in the sea at Portsmouth on Sunday, he said: “Roads are all blocked, they are never going to be able to leave here.” He added: “It was only yesterday (at the protests in Dover) when we warned them that we will not accept this any more, and that this is no longer an option to tell us that the boat numbers are down.” Some eight boats carrying 625 people arrived in the UK having crossed the English Channel on Sunday, Home Office data shows.

Matt Jukes, Deputy Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police, and arrester/detainer of pro-Palestine journalists – new facial recognition software policing the protests and people being masked.

Patriot Platform – two protests this week. Their video narrated by a US lady, claiming they are Christian. Are Patriot Platform like Nazi SA street armies.

Sam Williamism – if Marches go past Scotland Yard – facial recognition software. shouting at an empty building. But what I do have a problem with is what happened next. So, let me set the scene. You’ve you’ve exercised your democratic right, freedom of speech, and then you’re going to march somewhere. You really really want people to see you. So from here, you’re going to march somewhere. Logically, where are you going to march? The Supreme Court is just over there. Um, you could go up Victoria Street. You could go to Victoria Station, but what would be the point in that, especially on a Saturday? Um, you could go down there like go visit MI5. There’s no point in going down there. Um, you could go across the bridge to Waterloo. You could go up here, Downing Street, Trafalga Square. If I was on a protest march and I’d finished shouting at the building, I would go up there. Downing Street, Trafalga Square. Iconic. The best place to go. The buildings are still totally empty, but it just feels better. And I think that’s the most important thing. But they didn’t do that. No. Where did they go? Yes, that’s right. They went [music] to Scotland yard. Guess I created a little bit of uh internet drama the other week, didn’t I? Because um I had a very simple question which is just, you know, why why on earth would the digital ID march be brought past um Scotland Yard? And it did create quite a lot of drama. But, you know, I I’d sort of decided to just to leave it, you know, just to leave it until yesterday, the 1st of November once the people had finished shouting at the Supreme Court, the march came up here, straight past Scotland Yard. There’s the camera that I was talking about the other day, by the way. I can’t see it. There we go. There it is. Um, why on earth did they come past here? Well, there was also a counterprotest against them. And where was the counterprotest held? It was held here at New Scotland Yard. And I was just like, dude, what on earth is going wrong? And why are all of these protests at New Scotland Yard? The police are the public and the public are the police. Pelian principal. Number seven, my favorite. So, you may remember that in my video I was questioning if they’re doing facial recognition with that camera, do they not have to um announce that they’re doing it, put up a sign or whatever? And I found out something extremely interesting. And I’ve cracked it. I’ve I’ve I’ve solved the Enigma code. Of course, I I I went to Charing Cross Police Station and I spoke to a young boy um who was impersonating a police officer and it said and he said, and I quote, “As far as I’m aware, our facial recognition is only done through the vans. I’m not aware of any facial recognition schemes that we do through buildings.” Well, he was wrong. Very wrong. So what they do with the vans is called LFR, live facial recognition where they are comparing faces against a known database of wanted people and supposedly if it’s not you, the machine just forgets about you. It forgot you ever saw you, you know, straight away, no problem.

Foreign Secretary, Ed Milliband, imposes sanctions on Israel in 6-9 months’ time. The legislation I have announced today will be in place within 6 to 9 months and we will also take more immediate steps. Today we are sanctioning a further set of extremist settlers who have supported or incited acts of violence against Palestinian communities. And I can also announce that we are extending the existing global human rights regime such that it will enable swifter action to deter settlement expansion, including crucially seeking to present the development of E1. I also want to address the question of arms sales. We have already suspended over 30 arms licences used by the IDF in Gaza. That suspension remains fully in place. We will now also refuse all licence applications for arms and other exports that materially contribute to the occupation, in effect a double lock against arms sales. This means the ban on such exports will now remain as long as the occupation persists. To advance the two state solution, we also need viable and effective Palestinian governance. On the question of genocide, the UK has always supported full, robust and fair judicial processes to consider allegations, with final determinations made by competent courts before the British government reaches a conclusion. This has been the case for all of the genocides since the 1948 Genocide Convention: Rwanda, Srebrenica, Cambodia, and acts against the Yazidi people. This will remain our policy. It is right that this issue has been brought before the ICJ and I want to make it clear that we support the Court in coming to its determination. So accountability for what has happened in Gaza matters. But even more urgent is action to address the ongoing crisis. Because today in Gaza, the death and suffering continue. Nearly a year ago, Madame Deputy Speaker, a ceasefire was declared. Yet over 1,200 Palestinians have been killed since. And the people of Gaza are experiencing a totally avoidable humanitarian catastrophe, I am afraid, driven by decisions of the Israeli government. Last week I talked to courageous doctors and humanitarian aid workers who have served in Gaza. It was a heartbreaking conversation. They recounted: Children dying waiting for medical treatment. People forced to live next to open sewage and without shelter. And food insecurity rampant. I’m sure the whole House agrees, this is unconscionable. So I pledge we will continue to do everything we can to provide all the humanitarian support possible to help the people of Gaza. UK-supported hospitals in Gaza will enable around 800,000 medical consultations this year and essential health services for patients. UK expertise will deliver care to over a thousand child amputees. And we recently welcomed another wave of students from Gaza coming to study in Britain and we will welcome more. But in truth, unless Israel changes course, the situation will remain dire. So we are taking further steps – both ourselves and with others. Our extension of the global human rights sanctions regime will enable us to target those responsible for violations of international humanitarian law, whether in Gaza or anywhere else in the world. And we will at the UN General Assembly in New York later this month shine the clearest and harshest spotlight on what is happening and what must change. And with Jordan, we will convene countries across the world to lead a call for action on health and humanitarian access. We will also lend the UK’s voice to the growing global alliance of countries – led by Arab partners in the region – calling for the full implementation of the US-led 20 point plan, the rejection of extremism, and for a lasting end to the cycles of violence. As we implement the policy measures I have announced today, we will continue to assess the government of Israel by its actions. We want to see a new approach – in both Gaza and the West Bank. Madame Deputy Speaker, today we refuse to be bystanders to further suffering and to the destruction of the two state solution. We call out what is unlawful. We act on the import of goods from illegal settlements. We ban advertising of illegal settlements We act on services to prevent new settlement expansion. We act on settler violence. We support accountability for what has happened in Gaza. And we pledge to galvanise the international community to confront the ongoing and urgent humanitarian crisis. Above all, we say: Britain is not silent in the face of deep injustice and nor is it powerless.

Joe Banks joins Tony and Martin. His article ‘How Bristol’s Tallest Building Will Be Linked To Israel’s Atrocities’. He explains how the sanctions will effect the companies involved in this building. Joe Banks @JoePBanks Yesterday’s announcement that the UK will ban goods from illegal Israeli settlements was only one part of a much wider new sanctions regime. The government says it will also target companies and individuals providing “construction, infrastructure, financing, or real estate” for settlement expansion. Foreign Secretary Ed Miliband warned those who “finance or facilitate illegal settlements” that they will face UK sanctions. That has potentially significant implications for a story I investigated last month for @MiddleEastEye .What will become Bristol’s tallest tower is currently rising in the city centre. Behind it is Israeli pension and insurance giant Menora Mivtachim, which backs Cain’s UK student-housing platform – a partnership whose portfolio was valued at more than £800m after its expansion into Bristol, with developments across Russell Group university cities. According to Who Profits, Menora Mivtachim have: (1) – Directly financed settlement construction, including 80 homes in Ariel and 84 homes in Ma’ale Adumim – the major West Bank settlement adjoining the crucial E1 area, whose expansion the UK is specifically seeking to deter. (2) – Financed a 1,642-home development in Katzrin in the occupied Syrian Golan, alongside tourism, roads and infrastructure. (3) – Holds a 74% stake in a solar project in the occupied West Bank, jointly owned with the Israeli settlement of Na’ama. (4) – Built significant shareholdings in companies involved in settlement construction, infrastructure and services. (5) – Holds significant stakes in companies providing security, fuel and other services to settlements across the occupied territories. All this sits alongside the fact that they have helped finance major Israeli military projects, including the IDF’s huge new intelligence campus in the Negev, intended to house Unit 8200, the signals-intelligence unit behind AI targeting tools used in Gaza. None of this means Menora will be sanctioned. The legislation and designation criteria are still to come. But yesterday’s announcement puts my investigation in a new light: Menora has documented financial links to the kinds of settlement construction, infrastructure, financing and commercial activity the UK government now says its new sanctions regime will target.

Lord Levy on how London Jews are dismayed by Netanyahu. Declassified documents show UK aware of Israeli war crimes for 24 years UK Foreign Office files, public since 2024, record warnings about Israeli violence and rights abuses since 2002. Share Declassified documents show UK aware of Israeli war crimes for 24 years on social media British diplomats condemned Israeli conduct in the occupied West Bank as a pattern of human rights abuses in 2002 – 24 years before London took a tougher stance towards Israel this week. These decades-old condemnations are contained in UK Foreign Office files written during the administration of former Prime Minister Tony Blair while Israel undertook a brutal 2002 offensive in the occupied West Bank. The files, released in 2024 and reported in a recent investigation by the website Declassified UK, record British diplomats describing a pattern of abuses by a state their own government would go on to arm for the next two decades. Today, Blair sits on the Board of Peace that presides over Gaza, where Israel’s disregard for Palestinian lives and the rules of war has been demonstrated on a genocidal scale, while the UK’s newly seated leadership refer to Israel’s actions as “a stain on the conscience of the world”. But what did the British government already know about Israel’s actions more than 20 years ago? What the files say That record begins in March 2002, when then-Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon launched Operation Defensive Shield in retaliation for a wave of attacks by Palestinian armed groups, including Hamas. Israeli forces tore through the occupied West Bank, killing 500 Palestinians in a single month, mostly civilians, and injuring another 1,500. British officials were deeply aware of the scale of violations committed by Israeli forces. A Foreign Office official wrote at the time that Israeli military operations in the West Bank involved a “pattern” of “human rights abuses”. A senior British army officer was more blunt, calling the Israeli military a “second-rate, ill-disciplined, swaggering and bullying force”. “They routinely use excessive force such as firing at the ‘legs’ of stone throwers or at ‘car tyres’ with the inevitable stream of ambulances ferrying youths to hospital with fatal bullet wounds to the head and body,” wrote the officer who was unnamed in the files. Those concerns were put to the Israeli government directly. Lord Michael Levy, Blair’s special envoy, warned then-Defence Minister Binyamin Ben-Eliezer that there was no military solution, and that the campaign would only produce more suicide bombers. The Israeli violations described in the files have only multiplied, even becoming routine across occupied Palestinian territory. Officials also wrote of Red Cross staff threatened at gunpoint, and their ambulances not allowed to reach the wounded. Today, intimidation and targeting of medics has become standard operating procedure for Israeli forces and settlers. The World Health Organization has documented 3,254 Israeli attacks on healthcare across the occupied Palestinian territory over 20 years, killing or injuring more than 4,200 patients and medical staff. More than half of those attacks – and the deadliest of them – have come in the past three years.

Peter Oborne, DDN, on UK sanctions on Israel. Peter Oborne: Britain has FINALLY stood up to Israel PoliticsJOE Peter Oborne, journalist with Middle East Eye, joined Ava earlier in the week to discuss Ed Miliband’s plans to sanction illegal Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank. He tells us that Ed Miliband finally has Labour on the right side of public opinion. Peter Oborne’s book Complicit: Britain’s Role in the Destruction of Gaza is out with OR Books now. Chapters: 00:00 Why Oborne admires Miliband 00:59 Is Miliband standing up to Israel? 02:23 Britain takes action against settlements 03:41 Britain’s changing position on Israel 04:39 The West Bank and international law 06:10 Is Britain helping Israel? 07:34 Why Starmer couldn’t do this 08:26 Starmer the lawyer vs Starmer the politician 09:20 How Starmer got it wrong 09:49 The tragedy of Starmer’s majority 10:48 Has Labour been captured by Muslim voters? 11:56 Labour finally responds to public opinion

UAE Bin Ziad gave warning to Netanyahu before October 7th attack. UAE warned Netanyahu of major Hamas operation days before Oct. 7 attack, news report says JERUSALEM (AP) — Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was directly warned by the president of the United Arab Emirates that Hamas was planning a major offensive just days before the militant group attacked on Oct. 7, 2023, according to an Israeli newspaper report. UAE President Mohammed bin Zayed spoke with Netanyahu 10 days before the attack and said Yahya Sinwar, the leader of Hamas in Gaza at the time, was planning an operation, the Haaretz daily said. Bin Zayed said it would lead to bloodshed and could destabilize the region and undermine the Abraham Accords, the normalization agreements between Israel and several Arab and Muslim-majority nations, the newspaper reported. But Netanyahu “reacted with relative calm,” according to Haaretz, which said he assured bin Zayed that Israel was prepared for any scenario and a possible attack was more likely to come from the occupied West Bank. Hamas militants killed some 1,200 people and took another 251 hostage in the Oct. 7 attack. Hundreds of Israelis, mostly soldiers, have been killed in continued fighting in wars in Gaza, Lebanon and Iran. Haaretz reported Netanyahu’s office called the report an “absolute lie” and said Netanyahu did not speak with the UAE president “during the period in question and received no warning from him.” His office denied Tuesday that the UAE gave him a warning. “If there was any relevant information, it was passed through intelligence channels between the two countries,” the statement said. The UAE’s Foreign Ministry also said that it would not comment on “speculation regarding conversations between government leaders.” Israel and the UAE have maintained “open and direct lines of communication” since they formally established ties five years ago, the statement said. It added: “When necessary, all relevant intelligence has been and continues to be communicated.” Israel is holding national elections next month and Netanyahu’s actions around the time of the Oct. 7 attack are a key issue in the campaign.

Elections in Israel. Joe Banks on Substack – Temple Scenes – and Joe Banks.com. He’s a Former General and a Grieving Father. And He Could Defeat Netanyahu. Gadi Eisenkot’s party is leading many polls. Will he loosen Netanyahu’s grip on power? KARMIEL, Israel — It was a gunshot to the head of a Palestinian militant that first exposed the gulf between Gadi Eisenkot and Benjamin Netanyahu. In March 2016, two Palestinians armed with knives attacked Israeli soldiers in the West Bank, wounding one of them. The soldiers opened fire, killing one attacker and leaving the other wounded on the ground. Several minutes later, a 19-year-old Israeli soldier named Elor Azaria cocked his rifle, aimed at the wounded attacker’s head and pulled the trigger. Azaria said he had felt threatened. The question of whether the soldier should face a military trial divided the country. To some Israelis, Azaria was no criminal but a soldier who had killed a terrorist. To others, Azaria had carried out an extrajudicial killing or even murder. He was eventually convicted of manslaughter by a military court. Eisenkot, then chief of staff of the Israel Defense Forces, defended the decision to prosecute Azaria, arguing that shooting an attacker who had already been incapacitated was incompatible with the values of the Israeli military. Netanyahu sided with the soldier and called for him to be pardoned. Elor Azaria sits with his parents and his girlfriend Orel at a military court. Israeli soldier Elor Azaria sits with his parents and his girlfriend Orel, left, as he awaits the verdict in his trial in Tel Aviv in January 2017. Azaria was convicted of manslaughter in a case that divided the country. A decade later, the dispute still reverberates. A former member of Netanyahu’s war cabinet, Eisenkot has seemingly overnight emerged as the prime minister’s most formidable challenger ahead of Israel’s parliamentary election on Oct. 27. His centrist Yashar! party — which he founded last year — was born out of rising discontent with Netanyahu’s response to the attack by Hamas on Israel on Oct. 7, 2023 and the war in Gaza that followed. In several nationwide polls,

Andy Thomas, author and website The Truth Agenda, joins Tony and Martin online. He discusses the anomalies of the official 9/11 story, and how some of the madder conspiracies have muddied the water. Fascination with conspiracies is massive right now, especially since the rise of Donald Trump, who is both the subject of many conspiracy theories and also the purveyor of them. New theories appear on social media on a near-daily basis, and with continual claims and counter-claims about fake news, it’s hard to know what to believe. To help clear up the confusion, here is a new edition of the most balanced and informed book on the topic, now updated with all the latest events, including pro- and anti-Trump theories, Edward Snowden’s mass-surveillance claims, post-truth issues, and much more. In this outstanding guide to conspiracies, researcher Andy Thomas looks at all the major theories, from the Roman Empire to the present day, exploring the social and psychological factors that have prompted them to spread. The accounts are stripped of unfounded opinion and presented factually, dramatically highlighting the core issues. Are we really under everyday mass-surveillance, as Edward Snowden claims? Is the rise of Donald Trump and global populism a genuine movement of the people or a manipulated social control experiment? Is there a secret governing elite ruling from the shadows, using fear and economic manipulation to create a network of global superstates? Could the attacks of 9/11 have been engineered by agencies within the USA itself? Andy Thomas invites you to read accounts and analyses of these and many other issues, to consider the facts and decide for yourself. … Reasoned, objective and most importantly fair…. a valuable addition to the existing canon of literature in this most fractious of fascinating, sometimes worrying and highly recommended.’ – Phenomena Magazine’Whether steeped in conspiracy lore or just a novice, you’ll get a better handle on what’s really going on in the world by reading Andy Thomas’s Conspiracies.’ – Nexus MagazineIn today’s environment, with trust in governments at an all-time low, conspiracy theories have found a new currency, and websites and social networking ensure they receive a wider and more rapid spread than ever before. But how do we separate truth from imagination? Was Princess Diana murdered, as many people think, despite all the official denials? Did NASA really go to the Moon, when anomalies in the photographic record suggest otherwise? Could 9/11 really have been set up by agencies within the USA itself? The author opens the conspiracy casebook by examining the mindset of those who believe in conspiracies, and considers whether the dismissive attitude towards them has been fair.Part Two looks into history to establish that when conspiracies do occur, credibility should therefore be given to belief in some of the alleged plots and cover-ups of today. This leads into a well-argued examination of some of the most popular conspiracies of our times, including theories over assassinations, UFO cover-ups, and widely voiced concerns over 9/11 and the ‘New World Order’.Part Three draws the conclusion that while not all conspiracy theories can be proven, they do at least draw attention to paths not to take, and can be valuable in helping to create a better world where new trust and hope can be forged. Are we living in a world of control, of oppression, of habitual deception? Is this really how things are, or simply human nature massively distorted through a dark lens? The truth probably lies somewhere in the middle. In today’s environment, with trust in governments at an all-time low, conspiracy theories have found a new currency, and websites and social networking ensure they receive a wider and more rapid spread than ever before. But how do we separate truth from imagination? Was Princess Diana murdered, as many people think, despite all the official denials? Did NASA really go to the Moon, when anomalies in the photographic record suggest otherwise? Could 9/11 really have been set up by agencies within the USA itself? The author opens the conspiracy casebook by examining the mindset of those who believe in conspiracies, and considers whether the dismissive attitude towards them has been fair.

“9-11/Israel did it” Interest of • Kevin Barrett • Christopher Bollyn • Laurent Guyénot • Anthony Hall • Alan Hart • Kenneth O’Keefe • Kees van der Pijl • Paul Craig Roberts • “Rebekah Roth” • Alan Sabrosky • Stephen Sizer • Victor Thorn •9-11/Israel did it/Israeli art scam Evidence for the proposition that the Israeli deep state was involved in the 9-11 event. This article presents evidence that the Israeli deep state was a prime mover in the events of 9-11. Note that it does not imply that other groups (i.e. the US deep state and maybe others like the Saudi Arabian deep state) were not involved in both the commission and cover up of the September 11 attacks. The 9-11 event advanced the Neocon PNAC agenda, with its explicitly stated need for “…a catastrophic and catalysing event – like a new Pearl Harbor” [1] in order to mobilise US public opinion for already planned wars, the effects of which would be to destroy Israel’s enemies. Contents 1 Official narrative 2 Control of World Trade Center Complex 2.1 Four key Zionist Network assets 2.2 World Trade Center Security 2.2.1 Who Killed John O’Neil? 2.3 Airport Security 3 Prior Knowledge 3.1 Gomel Chesed Cemetery Incident 3.2 Israeli Citizens Get Tipped Off 3.3 ZIM forewarning 4 Mossad connections 4.1 U.S. Army Study: On Mossad 4.2 Israeli espionage around 9/11 4.3 After 9/11 – More detentions of Israelis 4.4 Five Dancing Israelis 4.5 “We are not your problem”? 4.6 Truck Bomb Destined for George Washington Bridge 4.7 Mural Van 4.8 Urban Moving Systems 4.9 Ptech Software systems – Computer control backdoor 4.10 MITRE corporation (computer software) 4.11 Precision guided plane? 4.12 Rabbi Dov Zakheim and Systems Planning Corporation 5 Cover Up 5.1 9/11 “Investigations” 5.2 Chief judges 5.3 Others 5.4 9/11 Commission 5.5 Crime Scene Evidence Quickly Removed and Destroyed 5.6 Cass Sunstein ‘s “Conspiracy Theories” 6 Other circumstances 6.1 Job holders on 9/11 6.2 Who was on board flight 11? 6.3 Bush Speech Writers Grossly Inflate Number of Israeli Casualties 6.3.1 Who was Bush’s Speechwriter? 6.4 Mohammed Atta Leads Us Directly To Jewish Crime Network Doorstep 6.5 Al Qaeda = Mossad Playing Dress Up 6.6 Netanyahu Openly Gleeful of 9/11 Terror Attacks 7 Connected Events 7.1 Zionist would-be terrorist incident at the Mexican Congress Building 7.2 2001 Anthrax attacks 8 Advocates 8.1 Hamid Gul 8.2 Victor Thorn 8.3 Francesco Cossiga 8.4 Kevin Barrett 8.5 Alan Sabrosky 8.6 Louis Farrakhan 8.7 Kees van der Pijl 9 US Deep state involvement 10 See Also 11 Related Quotations 12 Related Documents 13 References One of the first operational steps in preparation for the 9/11 attacks would have been to secure control of the World Trade Centre Complex itself. This is crucial because without complete control, the setting of explosives to bring down the towers would be next to impossible without serious risk of discovery. Four key Zionist Network assets Larry Silverstein, who made billions of dollars from the attacks Frank Lowy Ronald Lauder Lewis Eisenberg Larry Silverstein – is a Jewish American businessman from New York. Silverstein obtained a 99 year lease on the entire world trade center complex on 24 July, 2001. The towers were in fact close to worthless, being filled with asbestos,[8] yet Silverstein “felt a compelling urge to own them” and took out specific insurance against acts of “terrorism”. Silverstein had breakfast in “Windows on the World” restaurant (located in North Tower 107th Floor) every morning. [9] but broke this routine on the morning of 11 September 2001. Silverstein’s two children, who also worked in the WTC, were also absent from work that day. Larry Silverstein was paid $4.55 billion in insurance money as a result of the destruction of the WTC complex[10]. He also sued the airlines and airport security, seeking $12.3 billion in damages, though his ultimate payout after a 13 year legal battle was just $95.2 million.[11] Silverstein was a personal friend of media-magnate Rupert Murdoch and former Israeli prime minister Ariel Sharon. Haaretz reported that he was such good friends with Benjamin Netanyahu that he spoke with him on the phone every Sunday.[12]…

UK air traffic control goes down – Israeli hack? MoD denies ‘military jet’ error caused air traffic control outage The Ministry of Defence has denied making any errors amid reports that data entered by a military jet was behind the air traffic control system failure which threw UK airports into chaos. A technical issue at National Air Traffic Services (Nats) on Tuesday led to more than 2,000 flights arriving or departing the UK to be cancelled, and the disruption continued into Wednesday. The Financial Times reported on Friday that it had been told by four sources that a flight plan submitted by a military aircraft triggered events that led to the outage. It claimed the entry caused a glitch within the wider air traffic control system that took hours to restart. The Ministry of Defence has denied making any errors amid reports that data entered by a military jet was behind the air traffic control system failure which threw UK airports into chaos. An MOD spokesperson said: “We do not believe there’s any indication of an error on the part of the military. “Because it’s subject to a live Nats investigation, which is expected to conclude next week, it would be inappropriate for us to comment any further while that investigation is ongoing.” A Nats spokesperson said: “We are continuing to investigate the underlying cause. “It would be wrong to speculate while that work continues, and a full technical investigation will follow.” The disruption has prompted calls for Martin Rolfe, chief executive of Nats, to resign. Mr Rolfe apologised for the incident, which he said he took “full responsibility” for. Michael O’Leary, the boss of budget airline Ryanair, called Mr Rolfe’s position “untenable” earlier this week. Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander told MPs on Wednesday afternoon that she did not believe the air traffic control issue was “unavoidable”. A Wizz Air spokesperson said the airline is “extremely disappointed” that a Nats technical failure caused the widespread disruption, adding: “Nats is simply not fit for purpose in its current form.” In August 2023, more than 700,000 passengers suffered disruption when flights were grounded at UK airports when Nats suffered a technical glitch while processing a flight plan.

Nazis developed both nuclear weapons | & MK ULTRA brainwashed assassins for USA | Israel behind the 7/7 London Bombings: Tony Gosling’s documentary, and article | Videos of full shows | Economic essentials: Michael Hudson | Blackrock/Vanguard | Why/how Israel Assassinated JFK & RFK | Operation Gladio | Tony on Brexit & (4th Reich) Traitors of Arnhem | Creation vs. Evolution | God vs. Lucifer | ‘Great Plan’ for 3 World Wars | Devil Worship: The Rise Of Satanism | Nuclear Armed IDF Doomsday Cult | Aanirfan | Armageddonists I have known: Nick Land (1976-8) | George Monbiot (1995-7) | Manna for the Revelation Generation: CONSPIRACY CLASSICS, longer interviews/lectures

Part Two – International news review, Accelerationist, Armageddonist reports and investigations

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XkHGD-Ac4r8

Funeral of David Halpin this week. The anomalies in the official ‘suicide’ story of David Kelly, as studied by David Halpin [VIDEO]. We are sad to hear of the passing of David Halpin. He was stalwart supporter of the Palestinian people. The things he witnessed in Gaza when he worked there as a trauma surgeon stayed with him throughout his life. He started the original ‘Gaza flotilla’ attempting to sail 2 boats with medical supplies and food in them to Gaza over 20 years ago. He truly was a remarkable person To the Attorney-General of the UK The Rt.Hon Richard Hermer KC re: the absence of a proper inquest into the death of David Kelly CMG DSc in July 2003 Dear Lord Hermer First, I would like to offer my congratulations on your recent appointment to the post of Attorney-General. I write to you in this regard. On 17 February 2009 you invited me, together with some other doctors, to visit you at Doughty Street chambers to discuss the death of Dr David Kelly. We set out our concerns about the manner in which the state had dealt with this tragedy and explained to you our doubts that it was investigated rigorously. As you know, the coroner’s inquest into Dr Kelly’s death was – uniquely – subsumed into the ad hoc inquiry chaired by Lord Hutton, who concluded that Dr Kelly took his own life in July 2003. This is the only time in British legal history that a coroner’s inquest into a single death has been adjourned using Section 17A of the 1988 Coroners Act so that a non-statutory public inquiry could be held instead. The lawful process of the opening of a coroner’s inquest did not happen. The cart was put before a well tried and respected horse. Careful analysis over many years by the group of doctors of which I was a member – plus the work of various lawyers, parliamentarians and investigative journalists – has found how woefully inadequate Lord Hutton’s non-statutory public inquiry was. To name just a handful of its deficiencies: Lord Hutton failed to call key witnesses to give evidence to his inquiry; yet those witnesses who were called were not required to give evidence on oath. We now know that there were no fingerprints on the knife Kelly allegedly used to end his life – even though he wasn’t wearing gloves on the day his body was found. (This was never mentioned at the Hutton Inquiry even though it was known to Thames Valley Police at the time the Hutton Inquiry hearings took place). Lord Hutton spent only half a day of the 24 days on which his inquiry sat examining the medical evidence relating to Dr Kelly’s death. And Lord Hutton failed to consider the crucial matter – incumbent upon every coroner – of whether Dr Kelly intended to commit suicide. I must stress that the above list is not exhaustive. It is designed to underscore the point that, legally speaking, Lord Hutton’s ad hoc inquiry was less independent and less thorough than a coroner’s inquest would have been, with disastrous results. The high bar that a coroner would have had to clear in order to reach a suicide finding in the matter of Dr Kelly’s death was simply absent from the Hutton Inquiry. When we met you at your chambers in 2009, we were being helped pro bono by Leigh Day & Co. Knowing you to be a man of truth and integrity, Frances Swaine, of that firm, advised us to consult you. Your sympathetic view was that we should focus on the first cause of death advanced by Lord Hutton – “haemorrhage from a cut left ulnar artery” – as originally written by a Home Office pathologist, Dr Nicholas Hunt, and also to judicially review the then Attorney General, Baroness Scotland, rather than JR her refusal to instigate an inquest. You may know that with wide public support a hearing was eventually held at the High Court in December 2011 – Halpin v Regina. In total, about five hours were spent in plea and defence. At the hearing’s conclusion, Mr Justice Nicol read out from 19 pages of text and determined that the Attorney General of the day – Dominic Grieve – had been right to refuse an inquest into Dr Kelly’s death in 2011. And there, the matter of Dr Kelly’s unnatural death has most unsatisfactorily remained, for Mr Grieve’s decision was no more than a distant echo of Lord Hutton’s original finding. I am aware that Britain’s legal system is facing many crises, especially in the criminal and family justice courts and in terms of prison capacity. Yet public trust in our country’s law enforcement, and what follows in the courts, has withered. Specifically, many British citizens – including some Appeal Court judges – do not believe that Dr Kelly’s death was adequately investigated at Lord Hutton’s inquiry. This has left a cloud of suspicion hanging over this troubling and vital matter. For this reason I am calling upon you to kindly consider allowing a full coroner’s inquest into Dr Kelly’s death to be held in order to resolve this situation for once and for all. My understanding is that you alone as Attorney-General, has the power to do this. I revere ‘the law’ and quote from your speech of yesterday in the Royal Courts of Justice. “Being in government is a privilege that carries the responsibility of having to make hard choices but as we face the challenging path ahead the rule of law will be the lodestar for this government.” * Yours sincerely, David Halpin MB BS FRCS Dartmoor

Trump to give everyone $5,000 if they vote for him!? US President Donald Trump has offered every adult American $5,000 (£3,700) if Republicans win November’s midterm elections, but it is unclear how such a plan would be funded and whether it is legal. His remarks prompted raucous applause from supporters at a party convention on Wednesday night, although Democrats labelled it an “empty promise”. Trump also told the Republican conference that the money would have to be spent in the US, but it is unclear how that would be monitored. US Vice-President JD Vance suggested it might be paid for by tariff revenue and that such cheques would not go to wealthy Americans.

Craig Murray on control of the Straits of Hormuz. Will Strait of Hormuz Stay Closed? Craig Murray on Iran’s Leverage Deep Dive Perspective Will the Strait of Hormuz stay closed — and why does former British Ambassador Craig Murray say that closure proves Iran is a civilization the US cannot conquer? In this deep-dive interview, Craig Murray joins Deep Dive Perspective to assess two years of war in Gaza, Lebanon, Yemen and Iran, and explains why — in his view — the US/Israeli campaign against Iran has failed to achieve regime change. Drawing on his experience as former UK Ambassador to Uzbekistan and his recent time on the ground in Lebanon, Murray argues that Western elites misread Iran by listening to exiles and Gulf clients, and underestimated Iranian national cohesion after the recent 12-day war and the history of the 1953 Mossad/CIA intervention. Murray contends that Donald Trump’s response — including threats of sweeping sanctions on anyone trading with Iran — reflects a mercantilist worldview focused on physical control of trade, ports and shipping rather than free trade. In Murray’s analysis, closing the Strait of Hormuz hurts Asian economies that depend on Gulf oil while doing little direct damage to the US, which he presents as part of a deliberate strategy to damage China, India and other competitors. He further alleges — as his own estimate, not a verified fact — that market volatility around negotiations has been exploited for personal financial gain through oil futures, citing trades placed in the half-hour before announcements. These are the guest’s allegations and interpretations. The conversation also examines Iran’s resistance economy after decades of sanctions, why Murray believes Iran can build a resilient, sanctions-proof industrial base for its 90-million-person market with access to Pakistan and neighboring states, the role of Dubai as an alleged sanctions-busting entrepot, parallels with Venezuela’s domestic pharmaceutical production, and why predictions that Saudi desert pipelines will strip Iran of leverage ignore — in Murray’s view — Yemeni resistance in the Bab el-Mandeb and potential Iran-China pipeline corridors via Afghanistan. The discussion closes on what a one-state solution framed to 1946 borders means for Palestine’s endgame. In This Episode: • Why Murray says Iran is a civilization, not a militia — and why it wasn’t defeated like Syria or Venezuela • Strait of Hormuz closure: leverage, global oil prices, and who it really hurts • Mercantilism vs. free trade: Trump’s tariff and port-control worldview • Is China already the world’s economic — and military — superpower? • Dubai as sanctions busting hub: would enforcing sanctions collapse its economy? • Iran’s sanctions-proof economy: minerals, talent, and a 90M market • Pipeline politics: Saudi desert pipelines, Yemen, and the China-Iran corridor 00:00 — Introduction: Craig Murray — From Ambassador to Rights Warrior 02:15 — Gaza, Lebanon, Yemen: Two Years Watching Genocide Up Close 05:40 — Has Iran Been Defeated? A Civilization vs. Empire 09:30 — The 12-Day War: Mossad, Insurgency and Why Regime Change Failed 15:20 — Strait of Hormuz Closed: Trump’s Mercantilist Gamble 22:10 — Hurting China: Why Closure Is Seen as a Feature, Not a Bug 28:45 — Venezuela Parallel: Seizing Oil and Blocking China 33:00 — Dubai: The Worst-Kept Secret of Sanctions Busting 38:20 — Resistance Economies: How Iran and Venezuela Build Self-Sufficiency 44:00 — Pipelines, Yemen and the Guardian Claim About Saudi Leverage Craig Murray is a former British Ambassador to Uzbekistan, author, and human rights campaigner. He has reported extensively from Lebanon and is a frequent commentator on UK foreign policy, the Middle East, and civil liberties. Views expressed are his own.

Russians arrest ‘spy’ in British Embassy in Moscow. Russia arrests ‘spy’ at British Embassy over ‘terror attack to draw UK into war’ Footage shows the alleged ‘spy’ overpowered by masked and armed plain-clothed FSB officers. Vladimir Putin’s FSB security service has detained a “Ukrainian spy” working at the British Embassy in Moscow. The intelligence agency alleged a bizarre plot to stage potentially deadly “acts of sabotage and terrorism” against Ambassador Nigel Casey and other members of the UK’s diplomatic mission. Moscow would be blamed for the attacks, in a “false flag” bid to draw Britain fully into the war against Russia. The bombshell allegations could potentially spark fears the operation is an elaborate FSB stunt aimed at engendering suspicion between Britain and Ukraine, to disrupt a key axis of Kyiv’s defence. Moscow regularly disapprovingly depicts the UK as Ukraine’s staunchest Western ally. A spokesperson for the UK’s Foreign, Commonwealth and Security Office (FCDO) said: “We don’t comment on security matters. It is common that Russian state actors seek to drive wedges between Ukraine and its international partners through disinformation.” Footage shows the alleged 45-year old “spy” – a Russian citizen evidently employed as a security officer at the British Ambassador’s official Residence – as he was violently overpowered by masked and armed plain-clothed FSB officers in Moscow, and thrown facedown on the ground. The video purports to show a confession by the alleged SBU security service in Kyiv. The alleged agent is accused by Russia of supplying a security and military linked Ukrainian blogger Dmytro ‘Apostle’ Karpenko with secret details about diplomats and their movements. The purported “confession” shows the unnamed detainee claiming “the Ukrainian authorities were very interested in the information for the purpose of carrying out acts of sabotage against the British Ambassador, the Embassy, and the British Residence in Moscow”. Article continues below ADVERTISEMENT The detainee is shown on the FSB video saying: “I was a member of the security staff at the British Embassy in Moscow. Article continues below ADVERTISEMENT “Specifically, I handled security duties at the British Ambassador’s Residence in Moscow.” This is one of Moscow’s most prominent diplomatic buildings directly across Moscow River from the Kremlin. “In January of this year, I contacted Dmitry Karpenko, a Ukrainian blogger and journalist – specifically, a pro-Ukrainian blogger,” the ‘suspect’ alleged. “I told him I worked at the British Embassy in Moscow. “He was very interested in this information – specifically, details about the Ambassador [Nigel Casey], his deputies, other diplomats, and the staff of both the Embassy and the Residence. He wanted their personal details, addresses, and full names. “Information on the vehicles they drove, their movements, the restaurants they visited, and the cities they traveled to; and the arrival and departure times of all staff and diplomats. “He was also extremely interested in the security arrangements – how security and protection were handled at the British Embassy and Residence in Moscow. “This included the access control system, events held on the Residence grounds, and the number of security personnel on duty. “In short, he wanted all information regarding the security of the British Residence and Embassy in Moscow. In the alleged confession, he continued: “When I asked why he needed this, he replied that the Ukrainian authorities were very interested in the information for the purpose of carrying out acts of sabotage against the British Ambassador, the Embassy, and the British Residence in Moscow.” So far, the FSB has offered no direct proof of potentially deadly attacks targeting Britain’s ambassador and other diplomats. The suspect has been charged with high treason under Article 275, which can carry life imprisonment. It is understood he was employed by an outside organisation providing security to the embassy and not by the British government directly Russian state news agency TASS claimed: “The Kyiv regime, in order to preserve itself, is ready to resort to sabotage and terrorist acts against its strategic allies.” The FSB urged Russian citizens to refrain from any contact with pro-Ukrainian bloggers. When he arrived in Moscow in 2023, Casey, 57, made a video appeal from his Residence, with the Kremlin visible, calling for the “ending the human suffering caused by Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rKggTxdaIYA

Christopher Bollyn, author of ‘Solving 9/11’, on the Oded Yinon Plan to balkanise Middle East for Israel’s benefit. Eight years have passed since the terror atrocities of September 11, 2001, heinous false-flag terror crimes which took the lives of thousands of innocent people and led to drastic changes in the United States and around the world [VIDEO]. Although the terror attacks have yet to be properly investigated and prosecuted by the federal government, we now have scientific evidence that proves that the official explanation is nothing but a pack of lies, a massive deception foisted on the public by corrupt government officials and the controlled media. Most significantly, this deception was promoted by officials and media owners who knew it to be false. The U.S. Department of Justice, for example, oversaw the destruction of many tons of structural steel – crucial evidence from the crime scenes. On one hand, the government and media have intentionally pushed a fabrication that a band of Islamic terrorists hijacked airplanes and flew them into the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, causing the complete destruction and pulverization of two 110-story towers and a 47- story building in lower Manhattan. Using this deception, the federal government and its agents have created a police state in the United States and forced Americans and other Western nations to participate in an utterly fraudulent “War on Terror,” waging illegal wars of aggression and occupation in the Middle East, Central Asia, and Africa. Untold thousands have died in these illegal wars of aggression. On the other hand, we have scientific evidence that the Twin Towers were blown up with an advanced form of super-thermite, chips of which were found in five different samples of the dust from the demolished towers by Dr. Steven E. Jones of Brigham Young University. This crucial Bollyn.com discovery, published as a peer-reviewed paper in March 2009 with other scientists, completely disproves the official version that the Twin Towers fell as a result of fires caused by the plane crashes. This discovery also explains the explosive destruction and pulverization of the immense steel-frame and concrete buildings. As Professor Jones says, “The data doesn’t lie.” Rather than addressing the evidence that the World Trade Center was demolished with explosives, however, the new administration of President Barack Obama continues to use the 9- 11 deception to increase the war effort in Afghanistan, occupying a nation that had nothing to do with the terror attacks in the United States. Neither Osama Bin Laden nor the Taliban had anything to do with the demolition of the World Trade Center, which the evidence proves was carried out using an advanced form of Thermite created using nano-technology. Nor did the airplane crashes themselves cause the towers to collapse. The plane crashes were merely part of the deception, meant to provide a plausible explanation for the pre-planned explosive demolitions that followed. This is why 2009 is such a crucial year for 9-11 truth. A modern republic like the United States cannot continue for very long as a free nation with a government and media that lie to the people about the murder of thousands of its citizens and illegal wars supposedly waged on their behalf. This is clearly a state in the process of a revolutionary change. The American people will not tolerate a police state using such outrageous lies to rob them of their money and freedom. “We are not afraid to entrust the American people with unpleasant facts,” President John F. Kennedy said in 1962. “For a nation that is afraid to let its people judge the truth and falsehood in an open market is a nation that is afraid of its people.” So, who is really afraid of unpleasant facts and the truth of 9-11? It is not the people, but the culprits of the terror atrocity and the subsequent cover-up who fear the truth. My work provides some of the unpleasant but essential facts about 9-11. It represents eight years of work and is dedicated to the truth and the people who died on that day. It is unacceptable that their deaths, and the suffering of their families, have been exploited to deceive the world and wage illegal wars. Christopher Bollyn Labor Day, 2009

Michael Hudson on the West’s financial corrupt system forcing us in to WW3. Michael Hudson: Destiny of Civilization – Fractionalisation & Collapse Glenn Diesen Prof. Michael Hudson, a world-renowned classical economist, discusses his book on how economies financialise and die. The Destiny of Civilisation – Socialism uh was viewed as uh the next stage of industrial capitalism. Uh in the late 19th century, not only Marx was talking about socialism, there were all sorts of kinds of socialism. There was Christian socialism, there was anarchist socialism, there was social democracy. And what everybody was in agreement all of the vested interests was you needed uh an governments to play an added role in the economy to provide basic needs at subsidized prices and uh it was the America’s first economics professor at the first business school the Wharton school u that uh said Simon Patton said that Public infrastructure is a fourth factor of production besides labor, capital, and land, which really isn’t a factor of production, but uh rent extraction. Uh and but public infrastructure doesn’t aim at making a profit. It aims at minimizing the price of basic needs so that uh labor can doesn’t have to u cover these costs and employers can uh won’t have to pay for these costs because public investment is more productive and less highpriced than private investment because uh the aim of public uh infrastructure canals, railroads u public uh is not to make a profit, it’s to make the economy profitable. Well, it was the conservative prime minister Benjamin Draeli in Britain that said health, public health, that’s the center of things. And it was Draeli that promoted public health as opposed to the the United States under President Obama that says we’ve got to privatize public health. and uh the American medical associations as ever since the 1950s fighting we’re against socialized medicine. Well, uh it ends up that uh that uh instead of socialized medicine taking over the medical practice of doctors, the private health insurance companies have taken over what doctors can do uh here and pressed uh the uh cost of medical uh care to 20% of GDP. Well, this is far in excess of what other countries from Europe to uh China do. China offers public health and also free public education as England uh did for a long time and as many European countries did. But now it’s very expensive everywhere from uh over 50,000 a year at least in the United States to high prices for English uh Australian and other Western uh English-speaking universities and I guess in uh uh German universities. All of these functions that were supposed to create a competitive lowpriced economy are uh now being privatized, high-priced and uh countries such as China and Russia are uh keeping the price of basic needs low and they’re doing what is supposedly what democracies are supposed to do. The Americans say we’re democracy against autocracy. But that’s not what this fight is all about. It’s against Western oligarchy versus uh socialism uh state uh in in industrial capitalism with a strong public uh subsidy. uh and uh this subsidy prevents an uh a financial oligarchy from developing because what China has done and going further than the socialist movements have advocated in uh in the west is to say money is a public utility and we’re creating money and credit to the people’s bank of China to uh not to uh finance corporate takeovers and making money uh financially by financial engineering We’re using money and credit to finance actual construction. Well, they’ve over financed housing construction obviously, but they’ve also financed their industry. They financed their wind farms. Uh they’re financing their uh basic uh research or at least providing uh government uh subsidy and support for private enterprise. Uh doing all of these there’s a mixed economy. Every successful civilization in history has been a mixed economy.

Radio4All download pages
COMPLETE SHOW AND FULL INTERVIEWS [right click to download]
#1 – Complete 4hr show – [right click to download]
Full interviews with…
#2 – Peter Oborne: Britain has FINALLY stood up to Israel – 00:12:00
#3 – Lord Levy: on Miliband decision to sanction Israel over West Bank illegal settler violence – 00:06:00
#4 – Matt Jukes: Met Deputy Chief on Danny Tommos Balaclava-Clad Protests Sinister Intimidating – 00:15:00
#5 – Martin Rolfe: NATS boss, on outage possible Israeli hack of UK Air Traffic Control network – 00:05:00
#6 – Craig Murray: ex FO maritime law chief asks, Will Strait of Hormuz Stay Closed – 00:50:00
#7 – Michael Hudson, Destiny of Civilization Financialization Collapse Glenn Diesen – 00:50:00
#8 – Ed Miliband gives statement on UK sanctions on Israel Palestine over West Bank settler violence – 02:10:00

The Bristol Politics Show CANCELLED and attempts to intimidate us

July 2024 – Tony, Dave and Martin’s NOT The BCfm Politics show was CANCELLED/EVICTED from their PRSC studio in a no fault, no notice, no appeal, eviction by Chloe Slater of The People’s Republic of Stokes Croft (PRSC) arts centre – An email from Chloe and Keith Cowling explained that: ‘Transphobic’ leaflets, which we were not shown, had been left in the building by a recent guest (who denied it) making Transsexual users of the building feel ‘offended’ and ‘unsafe’. To quote: ‘Please let us know when you or Dave would like to come and retrieve your equipment and drop off your keys. Kind regards’ PRSC Directors (Keith Cowling, chair) PRSC / Stokes Croft China 17-35 Jamaica St Bristol BS2 8JP. Chloe Slater (formerly young man Jez and now self-defined as ‘she’) also made it difficult for us to retrieve the last of our equipment by inferring we couldn’t be trusted, we were made to wait in the cold outside their building for over 30 minutes to return their mixing desk and retrieve our remaining kit in December 2024. 

[UPDATE channel restored by YT in July 2025] October 2022 – Tony’s Public Enquiry Channel opened in March 2008, with 13 million views, over 1,600 videos and 26,000 subscribers is removed under false pretences by YouTube – A video Tony recorded in New Zealand ‘Bill Gates, ID2020 & Revelation: Quaker Tony Gosling on Covid 19 & the Bible’ and uploaded on 8th April 2020 got a ‘third strike’ but YouTube’s ‘medical misinformation’ regime was introduced in September 2021 so should not have included as ‘strikes’ videos uploaded before that date.  Documentary makers are just about the only public interest investigators left in the NATO zone. From the top down, our mainstream media, police, political parties & intelligence services are being compromised by feudal banksters, secret societies and the mafia. Key people intimidated by psychopathic black magic types and their pliable drones who will even kill to take over positions of power? Just search for “John Scarlett” and “Dodgy Dossier” and you’ll see what I mean. The Zionists are every bit as fundamentalist and twisted as the leaders and followers of ISIS. Register here and join us in the discussion as we wriggle free of the psychopaths, back to sanity http://www.911forum.org.uk

March 2020 – BCfm’s weekly Politics Show presented by Tony Gosling with Irish Republican Labour activist Martin Summers was forced off FM, now online only by station manager Pat Hart. He decided the show should be ‘rested, due to the pandemic’ on 24 March 2020 and then refused to communicate at all when we requested to do the show remotely. Bristol Community FM (BCfm) charity ‘CEO’ Patrick Hart is a long-time personal friend of Bristol’s all-powerful right-wing ‘Labour’ mayor Marvin Rees. Pat Hart has a private property portfolio on the continent and also does Public Relations work for property speculators who are taking over community facilities such as Redfield Cinema. Now on Internet only NOT The BCfm Politics Show is available 17:00-c. 20:00 live on Fridays. Pat Hart replaced us with a dumbed-down student show repeating MSM stories called The Bristol Agenda. If you’d like to share your views on his deliberate dumbing-down and pro-Covid jab mismanagement you can contact UK broadcasting regulator Ofcom or BCfm board chair and the ‘Don’ himself, here.

February 2019 – Ofcom complaint result: UKLFI exposed as creation of Israeli foreign ministry – Bristol Post article: BCfm cleared after being reported to Ofcom for anti-semitic conspiracy theories – It could have resulted in BCfm radio station being shut down if the complaint was upheld Tony Gosling reported to Ofcom by UK Lawyers for Israel after being accused of anti-semitism A Bristol radio station, which had one of its programmes reported for anti-semitism and racism has been cleared by Ofcom. The radio regulatory body received a complaint from “UK Lawyers for Israel’ over a show on BCfm radio, hosted by investigative journalist Tony Gosling. The weekly politics show, on the popular community radio station based in Easton, was reported for several allegations on a show which aired on November 23. Tony Gosling, who was a former BBC journalist between 1989 and 1993, has been producing and presenting ‘The Tony Gosling Politics’ show every week on BCFM radio for 11 years. They have released a statement which reads: “Whilst we are supportive of all our volunteer presenters, The Tony Gosling Politics Show only represents approximately ten percent of our political output content wise, and less than two per cent of our entire weekly output.” Mr Gosling’s programme looks at local politics and he interviews a range of councillors and MPs in the city. The show is also perhaps more well known for its alternative look at international politics, and he has a cult following online from across the world. Mr Gosling has made regular appearances on national media including the politics show with Andrew Neil on BBC One, and international channels such as Russia Today, Channel1 Russia, NTV, and recently for both Turkish and Lebanon TV.

November 2012 – Tony gets death threats on the phone from the Jewish Defence League – ‘you’re a dead man walking’ – a man calls him and Tony records the call. Audio of UK Jewish Defence League (JDL) death threat against British journalist Tony Gosling (2012) – Avon and Somerset police Special Branch investigate, trace the caller, and after six months report to Tony that the individual has been served a caution that they will proceed with a prosecution for harassment under the 1861 offences against the person act. Seems pretty clear this death threat was issued alongside the lies, copied below, which were published on their blog by London based UK JDL in November 2012.  Firstly Tony Gosling is not a ‘homophobe’. That accusation was first made in an article published by the ‘Harry’s Place’ blog, penned by Zionist David Toube and propelled by him anonymously into Private Eye in 2008. It refers to Gosling’s criticism of senior teachers at Bannerman Road Primary school in Bristol who used homosexual early learning picture books against the express wishes of the parent governors. His criticism was about the deception by teaching staff not because of the homosexual content of the books. Secondly, if you follow the JDL link you’ll find what Tony Gosling actually says about the ‘Protocols Of The Learned Elders Of Zion’ says “…I don’t think there is much doubt that the Protocols are fake…” Thirdly he is not a member of Bristol Palestine Solidarity Campaign and has never been to any of their meetings.

Autumn 2014 – Tony’s documentary production and distribution business shut down by its bank. Our thriving Co-op business bank account ordered closed for undisclosed reasons. Tony Gosling and Ben Edwards founded i-Contact Video Network to distribute documentaries on VHS video and DVD and to make their own documentaries as well as attend news events and sell video footage to TV news channels. Amongst the films we distributed were Operation Solstice, Coconut Revolution, Mark Purdey and Organophosphates, McLibel, 9/11 In Plane Site, Ludicrous Diversion and The Battle of Trafalgar. These, plus books, and even a board game about drug dealing ‘Dollars and Dibble’, were all available via mail order and we supplied libraries around the world too. The bank had clearly been ordered to investigate us for money laundering, although they never admitted it. All the questions they asked Ben and I were about proving our identity through passports etc.. When we did, yet more letters kept arriving demanding more proofs, birth certificates etc. and eventually when one of us missed supplying the required information, within a week or so of being asked, the account was summarily closed and we got a cheque made out to one of us with the few hundred pounds that was in the business bank account. Since neither of us could get a business bank account up and running for at least a few months and the bank account meant nobody could any longer use the website, we made the reluctant decision to shut it down. Thus was a thriving business killed off by the Co_operative bank. Having said that, co-op were not quite the worst. We did apply to open an account at Bristol’s ‘ethical’ Triodos bank, who proceeded to string us along for several months and then said our business was too risky for them to provide an account! 

 

MP3 of Friday 4th September 2026 show [right click to download] (from c. 11pm) This week’s full interview mp3s, bottom of page. SHOW STARTS 17:00 London time FOR c. 4 HRS TO c. 20:50 – OUR LIVE STREAM to Listen live online. Alt. live stream, DJ Plug Radio OR Download Show After Transmission HERE. Repeats 11 & 5 AM & PM daily on our stream
Download NOT THE BCFM POLITICS SHOW APP [ANDROID APP (1)] and [APKPURE (2)] – or the [Apple App store] – PS. You can replace evil Google Play, which effectively banned us, with [the Aurora store]
All time low: 31% trust the UK Press – UK media oligopoly TONY’S BOOKS: Bilderberg.org – 2 PAPER–BACKS – TONY’S CHANNELS: Telegram – Bitchute – 911 forum – Radio4All – The Land Is Ours – VK – Twitter/X – Farcebook – Brighteon – Rumble – RT Live on Rumble –  Goebbelsesque YouTube: This show; Public Enquiry; Peter Borenius; i-Contact & Occult Geopolitics

Radio4All mp3 audio files usually available from 23:00 2-4hrs, after TX – we’ll credit you if you rebroadcast. Any probs. mp3s should be on alternative links below by then

Part One – Local and National News Review

Andy Burnham’s Labour Party – possible sanctions against Israel. Burnham’s expected UK ban on Israeli settlement goods draws broad support A Labour lawmaker tells Al Jazeera sanctions would uphold British morals and legal obligations. London, United Kingdom – UK Prime Minister and Labour leader Andy Burnham is expected to soon approve a ban on goods linked to Israeli settlements after the Israeli government issued tenders to build more than 1,200 units for a settlement in the occupied West Bank called E1. “Sanctions on Israel’s illegal settlements would be a very welcome first step in helping to bring an end to Israel’s unlawful occupation,” Labour lawmaker Richard Burgon told Al Jazeera on Thursday. “The International Court of Justice has been clear that all states have obligations to bring that unlawful situation to an end.

Israel warns it will retaliate if UK imposes sanctions on illegal West Bank settlements Gideon Saar: ‘If Britain acts against Israel, Israel will act against Britain’ Israel has cautioned that it will respond in kind should the UK impose sanctions over its plans to expand illegal West Bank settlements. Foreign Secretary Ed Miliband said on Tuesday that the UK would “reset” its Israel policy in the coming weeks, while one of his ministers suggested that goods produced in Israeli settlements within the Palestinian West Bank could face targeted sanctions. Meanwhile, Prime Minister Andy Burnham warned that Israeli choices regarding a controversial settlement risk bringing an “end” to the prospect of a two-state solution with Palestine. Violence and land and water seizures by militant Jewish settlers in ?the West Bank have risen during the nearly three years since the Hamas-led October 7 attacks on Israel. Mr Miliband’s Israeli counterpart Gideon Saar said his country’s government was likely to act in response to UK sanctions. He said: “If Britain acts against Israel, Israel will act against Britain.” “If they act, I think they will be making a big mistake,” the Israeli foreign minister told a Hebrew language news site.

Despite pledge after pledge that he would not do so the lying former PM Kier Starmer resigned this week as an MP – after claiming he would stay until the end of his term. Pollsters say by-election in Keir Starmer’s old seat could be ‘make or break’ for Zack Polanski EXCLUSIVE: Pollsters explained Labour were still the favourites for the Holborn and St Pancras seat, and that the ‘shine’ had come off Zack Polanski with voters The by-election could be make or break for Zack Polanski The bombshell by-election in Keir Starmer’s old seat could be “make or break” for the Green leader Zack Polanski, polling experts have claimed. The former PM announced he was standing down this week, just months after leaving Downing Street. Speaking to this newspaper, pollsters explained Labour were still the favourites for the Holborn and St Pancras seat, and that the “shine” had come off Mr Polanski with voters. Polling guru Sir John Curtice said: “Polanski obviously made quite a name for himself, but his personal popularity isn’t quite what it was, and hasn’t been since the Golders Green incident. This looks at least as tough a gig for Polanski, if he stands, as Makerfield looked for Burnham. “The difference is that Burnham could always hope to and did succeed in persuading people who might otherwise vote Green, Lib Dem or even Tory to vote Labour to keep Reform out. Those kind of dynamics are not really available to Polanski as he’s the extremist in this instance, rather than the person in the centre.

John Langley joins Tony and Martin online. He discusses his article ‘Where Bristol City Council Money Goes’ from his blog The Almighty Gob.  Goram Homes failure to build any council housing in Bristol – failures of their various schemes. Picture the room. A committee chamber, half past six on a Tuesday, strip lighting doing its best against the dark outside. Papers stacked in the wrong order. Screens showing agenda item numbers, not the numbers that matter. Now. Somewhere in that quiet, procedural room, Bristol City Council public money keeps disappearing into the same holes, and nobody in the room asks the same question twice. Four case studies first. Then the money, followed all the way into the boardroom itself. Keep reading. The shape underneath doesn’t finish revealing itself until the very end. Hole One: Goram Homes. Set up in 2018 to build housing and capture land value for the council instead of a private developer. That was the pitch. The company’s sole shareholder is Bristol Holding Limited, wholly owned by Bristol City Council. The accounts tell it straight: net worth down from -£820,000 in 2020 to more than -£4 million by 2024, on top of land loan notes exceeding £10 million. A councillor read the 2023 business plan and worked out, correctly, that there had been no completions at all. That same report was accidentally published in full before being redacted. Named after a Bristol giant who overheated, got drunk, and fell asleep mid-race. Somebody in branding read half the legend. Promised value capture. Delivered a widening deficit. Told nobody until a councillor did the sums. Hole Two: Bristol Energy. Goram wasn’t the first time this shape appeared. Bristol Energy got there first, launched in 2015 to turn a profit for the council and cut resident bills. Managed neither. Total losses reached as much as £43.8 million before the company was broken up and sold off in 2020. The council’s own Grant Thornton report later found the founding decision was never properly scrutinised. A genuine exit existed in 2017, at a cost of £19.8 million. The council chose not to take it — the Lost Pause. The final bill more than doubled instead. When opposition councillors demanded an independent inquiry afterwards, the ruling group voted it down. Ask yourself why a council votes against finding out what its own company cost. Promised profit and lower bills. Delivered a £43.8 million loss. Told nobody until the loss had already doubled. Hole Three: Bristol Waste. Literally! This one isn’t a financial modelling failure. It’s a live police investigation. Allegations dating to 2020, still under investigation, that staff took payments to misreport waste volumes at the Avonmouth depot. Alongside it: a director expenses scandal of four-figure hotel bills and premium spirits, and five managing directors gone in under four years. On top of that, a loan book that grew to a further £12.12 million facility approved in June 2026 — none of the loan term, interest rate, or repayment profile shown to the committee that approved it. Notice the timing. Bristol always seems to find it. Promised an efficient statutory service. Delivered a fraud investigation. Told nobody until the police got there first. Hole Four: Temple Island. Not a company this time. A 250-year lease with Legal & General, and the one the council never gets to call misjudged by accident.

Housing built more in inappropriate areas. Block of flats teetering on edge of river bank after huge landslip underneath building Pictures taken on Wednesday morning show the landslip on the south bank of the River Avon in Bristol, which pushed small trees and bushes down towards the river and exposed cables at the new flat block The owners of a new tower block are trying to reassure residents that its foundations are fine, despite a huge landslip last week. Engineers for both Clarion House and Bristol City Council are checking out the situation on the south bank of the River Avon, in Bristol where the riverbank showed signs of collapsing. It is right next to the site of The Boat Yard – a huge and still not finished tower block development currently taking shape in the Totterdown area. Pictures by Bristol Live photographer Paul Gillis, taken on Wednesday morning, showed the landslip on the south bank of the River Avon. It took small trees and bushes down towards the river, and exposed cables that had been underground right next to The Boat Yard. The development includes a main tower block that’s 15 storeys high from road level and 17 storeys high from the level of the bank of the River Avon, but the images appeared to show the river bank eroded and is now beginning to erode under the building itself. Temporary fencing along that river bank has also fallen with the erosion, and in other parts of the river bank, a large crack has appeared around a bush that seems to indicate more of the river bank could erode soon. But a spokesperson for Clarion Housing Association, the London-based housing association which took over the site in 2020, said there was nothing to worry about. “We are aware of the issue at Totterdown Bridge and have taken prompt action to investigate further, with an engineer having already attended the site as a precaution. The building is not reliant on the river bank for any of its stability, and the engineer has confirmed that our site is not affected by the bank’s recent movement,” they added. Local residents reported the landslip to Bristol City Council, who confirmed they would be inspecting the site today, although a tweet response from the council appeared to suggest its only concern was the nearby Totterdown Bridge. “We are aware of the situation and are sending a bridge inspector to the site today to carry out an inspection and assess any risk to the highway,” the tweet said. The original developers, the Hadley Property Group, obtained planning permission and then sold the site as it was being constructed to London-based housing association Clarion, who will be turning it into a development that’s classified as 100 per cent ‘affordable housing’ in planning terms. Work building the tower block complex stopped last summer when the original construction company The Mid Group went bust last summer, and there were months with no activity until a new firm was found to finish the building. New construction firm the Hill Group took on the site in October 2022, but Clarion confirmed the flats would not be available to move into until at least the end of 2023, possibly into 2024 because, while the buildings themselves appear finished, the innovative construction method means there is still a lot of work to do inside.

ITV being bought by Comcast.  ITV News to remain distinct from Sky News up to ‘at least’ 2030 following merger Sky takes ownership of ITV national and regional TV news. Sky’s takeover of ITV’s media and entertainment business for £1.6bn will make it responsible for commissioning ITV News. The deal sees Sky buying ITV News, ITV’s free-to-air channels in the UK and the ITVX streaming platform, with ITV Studios left out of the acquisition and becoming a standalone business. Sky will inherit ITV’s Public Service Broadcasting (PBS) obligations that run until 2034, which require the broadcaster to provide ‘impartial’ national and regional news. Sky has promised that ITV News and Sky News will maintain “distinct editorial identities” until at least 2030. ITV’s current five-year contract with ITN, which produces national news bulletins at 1.30pm, 6.30pm and 10pm on ITV1, Good Morning Britain and London regional news, runs until the end of 2030 and contains no break clause, meaning Sky would inherit the agreement if the acquisition completes as planned in the second half of 2027. Other regional news ITV bulletins are produced by ITV itself. The transaction will see ITV’s existing 40% shareholding in ITN split equally between Sky and the newly independent ITV Studios. Existing shareholders Reuters, DMG and Informa will each retain their 20% stakes. ITN also produces news for Channel 4 and Channel 5. An ITN spokesperson said that the “unique model” of “four editorially independent national newsrooms under one roof” – also including Good Morning Britain – contributes to the “strength of the UK’s news ecosystem”. The takeover will result in the two businesses merging to become the UK’s largest commercial broadcaster, with Sky group CEO Dana Strong saying this means a 6.5% combined share of the total UK advertising market, according to Deadline. Sky has also identified around £200m in annual cost savings that would be delivered by the end of the third year after the deal closed. The company said that most of the cost cuts would be made through efficiencies in marketing, technology platforms and non-UK content. Strong has noted a “minority” of the savings from job cuts will come from reducing duplication “primarily in corporate and commercial functions”. Sky employs around 20,000 staff in the UK, while ITV has about 2,400 workers in the media and entertainment division. The news also follows Sky owner Comcast saying last month it plans to spin off its media operation into a separate publicly listed company, according to NBC News, which includes Sky and US film studio NBCUniversal. On Sky becoming part of NBCUniversal, Strong said: “We have a shared cultural heritage, NBC and Sky. We’ve both been passionate about bringing sports and entertainment events to consumers. “We have a very strong partnership where we’ve already been working on key content together, so some of our biggest shows, like The Day of the Jackal and SNL UK, were all done in a co-production environment with NBC.”

ITV report on renting in Bristol as Linda Beamish joins Tony and Martin. She’s interested in intentional communities as different ways of creating societies. ITV News West Country – Bristol is now officially the country’s least affordable city to live in, with an average 45% of salary going on rent alone. People renting homes in the city have told ITV News they’re having to make drastic life-changing choices just to be able to keep a roof over their head. One told us starting a family is impossible because she has so little money left after paying her housing bills. ITV News West Country – Bristol is now officially the country’s least affordable city to live in, with an average 45% of salary going on rent alone. People renting homes in the city have told ITV News they’re having to make drastic life-changing choices just to be able to keep a roof over their head. One told us starting a family is impossible because she has so little money left after paying her housing bills. #bristol #bristolhousing #bristolrent ‘It’s scary’: The reality of renting in Bristol as city named country’s priciest place to live in People renting homes in Bristol have said they’re having to make drastic life-changing choices just to be able to keep a roof over their head. One told ITV News starting a family is impossible because she has precious little money left after paying her housing bills. Another says he’s no better off after leaving London to return to his home city. Bristol is now officially the most expensive place in the country to live with an average 45% of salary going on rent alone. More than 120,000 people – around one quarter of the city’s population – rent their home which costs an average £1,885 a month, 6.5% more than a year ago. Emily, a 27-year-old key worker, stayed in Bristol after university and pays £850 a month in rent and bills for her share of a two-bed flat. She needs a car for her job and has little left for herself. More than 120,000 people – around one quarter of the city’s population – rent their home which costs an average £1,885 a month “It’s really scary,” she says. “It makes you feel hopeless. l won’t go out for a coffee because I know that’s £4. Every day I’m thinking about how I can stay in budget. If I can put £100 away a month, that’s good. “It’s impacting the plans I have for the future. I always thought I wanted kids but if I can’t have a financially stable life then I won’t have children and I know I’m not the only woman who feels that way.” Dave Pratt, a freelance stonemason, spends £500 a month on rent for ‘a box’ in the Easton area of Bristol, having recently returned to his home city from London where he paid a similar amount. “I only found a room because my friend couldn’t afford it and moved onto a boat to live. I thought I’d be able to get a bigger size room for the rent I’m paying. “I feel like people shouldn’t be forced out of the places they live and the places that they’ve grown up in surrounded by the people they love.” But landlords say the recently introduced Renters’ Rights Act is having the unintended consequence of forcing them to leave the industry due to their own rising costs. “There are rogue landlords who this bill was directed to but they’re the ones who aren’t going to comply anyway,” said Jo Hunt, who has rented property in Bristol for 30 years. “I think more and more will leave now. It’s all going to mean extra costs, some of which will be passed on to tenants which is going to make the problem worse for them.” Lettings agents say that will make their job of placing people in property even harder. Aaron Messenger of Greenwoods Property Centre says one in three renters he’s trying to place for is due to landlords taking back their homes to live in themselves or to sell up. “That stock level is probably the biggest issue,” he added. “When you’ve got the amount of people looking if I had 100 one-beds to rent out, they would all be rented out in a two-week period.” The Green Party-led Bristol City Council advocates for rent caps, limits on how much landlords can charge for rent or how much they can increase rent during a tenancy. But that needs central government approval and so far there seems little appetite. Cllr Barry Parsons, chair of the city council’s homes and housing delivery committee told us: “you have energy capped by the government and housing is just as essential. It’s really important that we can make a meaningful change there and prevent the spiral of rents that we’ve seen in the last few years.” The council has also committed to building more homes for social rent – half the market rent value – but demand far exceeds supply. Shared ownership – buying part of a home and renting the rest – and co-living developments are increasing in popularity but many believe it will take years to make a significant impact on the rental market.

Paul Burgess on CO2 and climate change. From serfdom to capitalism.  The people’s emergency briefing – pure propaganda – no evidence Climate Realism by Paul Burgess [download Paul’s paper] This video is part of an information pack of many papers, with a master paper that goes into detail on the whole subject. That master paper contains the links to many other sub papers. The whole is an information pack to expose the meetings being held throughout the UK. Meetings taking place and screenings of a secret ‘Climate Emergency’ film all over the country, but you have to be 16 years or older to attend. But don’t worry, a counselor is on hand to cope with distressed people. It’s a control meeting in every way. It’s pure scops. Recently, something was brought to my attention and it’s called the people’s emergency briefing. And I tried to find the video. It’s a 50-minute video that’s being shown in halls and village halls and meetings all over the country. And it’s actually um a video of climate alarmism in the most extreme manner. And so as as mentioned already um you have to be 16 and over to be there. Um it has to be a very controlled environment with uh the people showing it will have been briefed how to train the discussion afterwards um and so on and and it’s just ridiculous. It it’s so extreme and bad that I thought I can counter it but I couldn’t get hold of the video. So what I could get hold of was the previous videos from the different speakers and isolate their points so I know what this is being said in the video.

Andy Burnham’s first PMQs – Bristol mass transit system – Danny Kruger, jobs for young people – Ed Davey, Brexit. Made in EU. Andy Burnham’s first PMQs: here’s what we learned from this bloodless affair For Andy Burnham, walking into the bear pit that is Prime Minister’s Questions, it must have been hard to stay calm. His audience was a room of closely packed MPs, some hostile, some friendly – all very loud – many wanting to make a mark. And the full audience for PMQs extends far beyond the MPs in the chamber. Prime ministers are thinking about the media, external groups, foreign governments, voters and financial markets. The reactions of any of these matter. The PM has the dual worry of dealing with opposition questions while also demonstrating his or her worth to the party members sitting behind them. Backbenchers can signal a lack of confidence through quietness or just not turning up. It is no wonder that preparing for PMQs is, in itself, demanding. Alastair Campbell, who advised Tony Blair when he was opposition leader and in the early days of the New Labour government, is clear about just what it took. Preparation can take hours. Nerves don’t disappear. And it doesn’t appear to have got any easier in recent years. Burnham is, of course, new to this. And unlike many in his position, he hasn’t had a chance to rehearse as opposition leader. He was wise to spend part of Tuesday’s return to parliament on a statement and a lengthy question-and-answer session. It gave him a warm-up for the main event. After Keir Starmer was ousted as prime minister, Labour MPs will be willing Burnham to show that he can succeed. So how did he do in his first PMQs, and what can we glean from it? This was not a “full-blooded” PMQs. Burham chose not to mount attacks where others might have. A question from Reform UK’s Danny Kruger, for example, could have led to a reply focusing on the party’s reported problems. That it did not, may mean Burnham wants to move away from such attacks – or that he considers Reform less significant than it has been in recent years. Burnham’s jibes at the Conservatives were not fierce either….

Steve Keen – AI bubble and oil shortages from closure of strait of Hormuz. Top Economist Warns: You Have No Idea What’s Coming ProfSteveKeen The next financial crash is brewing, driven by production failures rather than just banking errors. Understand the risks. Most analysts focus on banking bubbles, but the real danger lies in the physical economy. Rising costs for necessities and disruptions to global logistics are creating a systemic fragility that traditional models fail to capture. We examine how external events like the Iran-USA war and climate patterns create a supply chain bottleneck that threatens modern stability. When we look at the broader global economy, the interaction between debt and material production becomes critical. As reserves run thin, the ability to service existing financial obligations weakens. This analysis explains how these physical constraints force an economic collapse that could reshape the financial landscape far differently than 2008. ? How the Iran war 2026 is already pushing oil price spike beyond what markets can handle ? Why a full-scale Iran nuclear war could crash global energy markets overnight triggering food supply collapse within 90 days ? The truth behind trump war Iran escalation and why ordinary people will pay the price at the grocery store ? How the global food crisis is being accelerated by dollar instability and unchecked military spending ? What the US, China & Russia are really fighting over and how it ends your access to affordable food ? Iran’s nuclear capability decoded and what it means for Middle East alliances and global supply chains ? The hidden link between energy market crashes and the fastest-moving famine the modern world has ever seen Questions this video answers: ? Is the Iran war already causing food shortages? ? How will rising oil prices lead to famine? ? What is Trump’s real agenda behind the Iran conflict? ? Will the dollar collapse because of the Iran war? ? How close are we to a global food supply crisis? ? What happens to food prices when energy markets collapse? ? Is a financial crash in 2025 now inevitable? This isn’t speculation, it’s geopolitical analysis backed by facts most channels are afraid to cover. Dr. Steve Keen is an influential economist who has dedicated over 50 years to challenging mainstream economic theories. Since his days as a university student, he has been engaged in a David vs. Goliath battle against conventional economic models. Holding a Ph.D. in economics, Dr. Keen is well-known for his critical analysis and advocacy for more realistic economic approaches. His work emphasizes the importance of accounting for financial instability and incorporates elements of complex systems theory. Curious Minds, Engineers, and Finance Professionals will appreciate his methodical breakdown of economic phenomena and his development of the Minsky software, which models financial crises. Dr. Keen’s contributions are crucial for anyone seeking a deeper understanding of how economic systems can impact technological and financial environments. His teachings offer valuable insights into the economic forces shaping our world. By following his analysis, professionals can gain a better grasp of economic dynamics that influence their fields.

Peter Hitchens ‘Obituary for UK’ – if a different opinion treated as a traitor. War with Russia. ‘Britain is dead – I’m writing its obituary’ | Peter Hitchens Peter Hitchens – Mail on Sunday columnist – returns to The Brendan O’Neill Show. Peter and Brendan discuss why voting never changes anything, why conservative parties are so hopeless, and why chaos, anarchy and tyranny await. 0:00 — Cold open 0:54 — Welcome: Peter Hitchens joins the show 1:20 — ‘The revolution has already happened’ — Andy Burnham and the new PM 3:00 — How revolutionary socialism swept into the West after 1989 4:02 — Was voting Reform a mistake? 5:03 — Broken Britain: crime, decay and daily life 5:45 — Defeatism vs describing defeat 6:15 — The Cameron takeover and the closing of the ‘inch of difference’ 7:26 — The collapse of free speech since 2010 8:42 — Lockdown, censorship and being called a killer 10:25 — Cameron’s forgotten war: Libya 11:33 — Public anger over immigration 12:14 — ‘Rubbing the right’s nose in diversity’: Labour’s migration strategy 13:19 — Migration Watch’s warnings, ignored 14:36 — Why Hitchens rejects mass deportation 16:28 — Farage, Reform and the guarded right frontier 17:11 — Rupert Lowe and Restore 19:05 — ‘Toy politics’: is the right too divided? 20:17 — Trump, Meloni and the failing global right 21:23 — Kemi Badenoch: reform lite? 23:39 — Who are these politicians? 24:58 — ‘The obituarist of a dead country’ 27:16 — Vigilantism, disorder and the fear of chaos 29:01 — Is free speech a lost cause?

Nazis developed both nuclear weapons | & MK ULTRA brainwashed assassins for USA | Israel behind the 7/7 London Bombings: Tony Gosling’s documentary, and article | Videos of full shows | Economic essentials: Michael Hudson | Blackrock/Vanguard | Why/how Israel Assassinated JFK & RFK | Operation Gladio | Tony on Brexit & (4th Reich) Traitors of Arnhem | Creation vs. Evolution | God vs. Lucifer | ‘Great Plan’ for 3 World Wars | Devil Worship: The Rise Of Satanism | Nuclear Armed IDF Doomsday Cult | Aanirfan | Armageddonists I have known: Nick Land (1976-8) | George Monbiot (1995-7) | Manna for the Revelation Generation: CONSPIRACY CLASSICS, longer interviews/lectures

Part Two – International news review, Accelerationist, Armageddonist reports and investigations

Bad week for Zelensky 1: RT & BBC reporting on SBU, GUR gunfight in Kiev. Ukraine’s SBU accuses Russian Volunteer Corps deputy commander Stepan Kaplunov of working for the FSB and plotting an Independence Day assassination. He says he was tortured into confessing. September 3, 2026, 9:19 pm Source: SBU Stepan Kaplunov, the deputy commander of the Russian Volunteer Corps, was in contact with Russian security services and was tasked with preparing an assassination attempt against one of the leaders of Russia’s opposition movement who planned to travel to Ukraine, Ukraine’s Security Service (SBU) said. The SBU said the attempt was planned for August 24, Ukraine’s Independence Day, and was foiled. The SBU did not name the intended target, but sources cited by the Ukrainian outlets Suspilne (the country’s public broadcaster) and Babel identified him as Akhmed Zakayev, a former Chechen field commander. In a video released by the SBU, Kaplunov says: “I was approached by an individual from the territory of the Russian Federation who was acting in the interests of the Federal Security Service (FSB) with the goal of recruiting me to take active steps to eliminate fighters of Ukraine’s Defense Forces and other individuals.” The SBU also said it found messages between Kaplunov and an FSB representative on Kaplunov’s phone. Because Kaplunov admitted to the contacts and cooperated with the investigation, the agency said, he was not placed under any pretrial restrictions. The Russian Volunteer Corps, meanwhile, published its own video of an official statement by Kaplunov. In it, he says he was “abducted in gangster fashion” by SBU officers on August 23 and subjected to “physical and psychological pressure.” Kaplunov’s lawyer, Taras Borovsky, told the Ukrainian outlet Ukrainska Pravda that the confession video released by the SBU was filmed “in captivity, under pressure, through torture and death threats.” Borovsky said the agency released it now to “whitewash the SBU’s reputation” after its shootout the previous day with the Main Intelligence Directorate of Ukraine’s Defense Ministry (GUR). SBU officers and GUR personnel exchanged gunfire in Kyiv on September 2. The SBU said its officers were carrying out “urgent investigative measures” when “a group of people” attacked them during a search and tried to obstruct the investigation. The investigation was connected to Kaplunov.

Bad week for Zelensky 2: Another demonstration in Kiev against MI6’s boy Zelensky virtually unreported in the UK. Thousands of protesters gathered in Kyiv and other Ukrainian cities to condemn President Volodymyr Zelensky’s government over corruption allegations and the firing of former Defence Minister Mykhailo Fedorov. Protesters accused the administration of ignoring public concerns and creating divisions in society. The unrest has intensified after Fedorov rejected a new government role and called for elections, while investigators continue examining an alleged money-laundering case linked to a senior official in Zelensky’s office. Ukrainian workers destroy army recruitment vehicle in expanding protests against “busification” Ukrainian workers intervened to interrupt a document check being carried out by two service members of the Territorial Recruitment Center (TRC) responsible for the forced mobilization or “busification” of tens of thousands of Ukrainian men off the streets of Ukraine. According to Suspilne news, TRC officers stopped a vehicle at a checkpoint in the western Ukrainian city of Lutsk and demanded to view the male driver’s documents. The man refused to provide any personal information and instead abandoned his vehicle and fled the scene to avoid ending up in the Ukrainian Armed Forces unwillingly. The TRC officers followed the man towards a residential building in their official vehicle at which point they were confronted by 30 Ukrainian workers opposed to another apparent case of government-sanctioned kidnapping. Daria Stelmaschuk, spokesperson for the Volyn Regional Territorial Recruitment and Social Support Center, stated, “After that, 30 civilians approached the scene and began physically resisting the police officers and service members of the Territorial Recruitment and Social Support Center, striking them with their hands and unidentified objects.” Both officers were injured in the protest, and their TRC vehicle was essentially destroyed by the crowd. According to the report: All the windows and headlights were smashed. All the tires were damaged. A radio was stolen. A body camera was taken. The vehicle keys were stolen. Just a day later, a 25-year-old man stabbed a TRC officer to death after being stopped and refusing to show his military registration documents. Both photos and summary of the case can be found on the website of Ukraine’s Prosecutor General’s Office and video of TRC officers beating the suspect appeared on social media.

Bad week for Zelensky 3: Ukraine Stored Ammo Next to Civilian Homes Twice in Six Weeks! Russians destroy massive Ukrainian arms dump in a residential area of Kiev  Sixty Dead Sixty people have died in two incidents — six weeks apart — in which Ukraine’s military and state-owned companies stored large quantities of ammunition in civilian warehouses or depots embedded in residential areas near Kyiv, and a criminal probe into the second and deadlier disaster found the same failure the first investigation documented: explosives placed beside people’s homes without their knowledge, in violation of the country’s own safety standards. Russia responded to the pattern on Sunday by announcing preparations for “massive strikes” on Ukraine’s energy infrastructure before winter, escalating a conflict in which infrastructure has become the defining battleground on both sides of the front line. On the evening of August 28, a Russian Geran-4 jet-powered drone struck a warehouse in Myla, a village in the Bucha district approximately 5 kilometers (3 miles) west of central Kyiv along the Kyiv-Chop highway. The drone hit at approximately 8:10 p.m. local time, triggering a fire that set off a chain of secondary explosions lasting hours as stored ordnance cooked off — the physics of ammunition in an uncontrolled fire, in which heat ignites successive munitions in a chain reaction that no suppression equipment can easily stop. The death toll climbed to 38, with four people still missing and 20 injured — including two children — according to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy. A care home for elderly residents and people living with disabilities was among the dozens of structures damaged. More than 300 emergency services personnel were dispatched to the site, and 381 residents were evacuated from the surrounding area. It was the war’s deadliest single attack of 2026, surpassing the 31 killed in a July 2 strike on Kyiv that had previously held that grim record. What Residents Were Never Told The warehouse, Ukrainian officials confirmed, stored shells, mines, other munitions, and drones — weapons that Ukraine’s Prosecutor General described as “explosive objects and materials.” Russia’s Defence Ministry claimed a different contents inventory — drone components and launch boosters for long-range aircraft — a claim that has not been independently verified. The residents of Myla knew none of this. One resident, Oleksandr, told reporters that villagers had no idea what was stored in the warehouse. “Nobody told us anything… People aren’t informed,” he said. Another resident, Borys Daniyluk, 61, asked why munitions had been placed in what had formerly been a food storage facility. “Why was this allowed at the depots, in a place where there used to be food? Why were ammunition and weapons stored there, next to a populated village?” Another villager, Liudmyla, offered a double answer when pressed on responsibility: “Putin! Who else? And those who set up the depot here.”

Polish drone plant fire “undoubtedly” arson and likely ordered by Russia, says Tusk There is now “no doubt” that a fire this week at a drone factory in Poland was caused deliberately, says Prime Minister Donald Tusk, who also suggested it was carried out on behalf of Russia. Speaking ahead of a cabinet meeting on Wednesday, Tusk noted that there had been “some very disturbing incidents and events in Poland and Germany over the past few [days]”. “This is a continuation of Russia’s escalatory actions throughout the region,” he continued. “Unfortunately, these are not the first cases and, even worse, they certainly won’t be the last.” On Sunday, a fire broke out at a production facility in the Polish city of Lublin belonging to JFG Composites, a company that produces components for the aerospace industry, including for military helicopters. Then, in the early hours of Monday morning, another fire occurred at a plant in Skarzysko-Kamienna, south-central Poland, belonging to WB Electronics, a Polish firm that is the largest producer of drones in the European Union. It supplies the armed forces of Ukraine and Poland, among others. By Monday afternoon, Polish prosecutors and the security services had confirmed that they were investigating the Skarzysko-Kamienna fire as a potential “crime of a terrorist nature” carried out with the involvement of “foreign intelligence”. On Tuesday, improvised explosive devices were found at one electricity substation in Germany near the border with Poland while another substation in the west of the country was attacked. That came on the same day that Germany announced it held Russia responsible for a drone attack on Leipzig airport last month. In his remarks on Wednesday, Tusk said that “there is no doubt” that the incident in Skarzysko-Kamienna “was deliberate arson, meaning an act of sabotage”. “In the case of Lublin, we do not have such evidence but, considering the nature of the production, it cannot be ruled out that deliberate arson occurred there as well,” he added. “I am in constant contact with the leaders of the countries in our region, and everyone realises that the coming weeks and months will be critical, not only in terms of events on the front and the entire Russian-Ukrainian war,” continued the prime minister. “These weeks and months will also pose a very, very significant challenge for all countries in this part of Europe, precisely because of Russia’s plans to escalate tensions and destabilise.” On Tuesday, a deputy interior minister, Czeslaw Mroczek, told broadcaster RMF that surveillance cameras had recorded a masked person entering the WB Electronics plant in Skarzysko-Kamienna. He said it was “obvious” that Russian involvement was suspected, pointing to previous similar cases in which agents working on behalf of Russia have carried out acts of sabotage in Poland. A report by the International Centre for Counter-Terrorism published earlier this year found that Poland is the “primary focus” of Russia’s growing campaign of sabotage in Europe. Last year, Poland confirmed that Russia was behind the fire that in 2024 destroyed Warsaw’s largest shopping centre. The Polish authorities are also seeking to detain two men believed to have sabotaged a rail line last year on Russian orders.

Russian drones allegedly attack Leipzig, Germany. Ursula Von Der Lyon – threatening Russia. Germany blames Russia for drone attack at Leipzig airport Government says ‘dangerous behaviour’ is part of effort by Moscow to cause damage with hybrid attacks The German government has blamed Russia for the drone attack on Leipzig airport last month, calling it “dangerous behaviour” and part of a systematic and concerted effort by Moscow to “cause great damage” through a large number of hybrid attacks. The interior minister, Alexander Dobrindt, and the foreign minister, Johann Wadephul, ended weeks of speculation and the government’s hesitancy to blame Russia, saying in a brisk 10-minute briefing in Berlin that all indications were the Russian state had provided the knowhow and equipment for the planned attack and “low-level agents” were recruited to carry it out. A drone loaded with explosives was discovered at Leipzig/Halle airport on 4 August near a Ukrainian Antonov cargo plane used to transport weapons to Ukraine. It failed to detonate but could have caused a catastrophe, authorities said. Russia will face a package of penalty measures, Wadephul said, adding that the German government saw “a need for appropriate and necessary action in this situation”. It would respond “to this hybrid attack in Leipzig with proportionate and measured, yet equally resolute, action”, he said. “We are not at war, but we are a daily target of hybrid warfare.” He added: “The dangerous behaviour of the Russian Federation is part of attempts at destabilisation, disinformation, threats, sabotage and aggression.” Berlin regretted the abysmal state of its relations with Moscow, he said. The EU expressed “full solidarity” with Germany over the attack, and Nato assured Berlin that it would defend its members. The French president, Emmanuel Macron, supported Germany’s move and the new round of European sanctions, saying: “These hybrid attacks are multiplying in Europe. They cannot go unanswered. “In the face of this escalation, we must be united, determined, and strengthen our support for Ukraine. France will continue to play its full part.” Giorgia Meloni, Italy’s prime minister, said: “The security of our allies is the security of us all. Attempts to intimidate us or to drive a wedge between allies will not succeed: hybrid actions against any one of us are a matter of concern for all of us, and will be met with a united response.”

Lavrov. Steve Jermy – policies not keeping people safe. Good Money After Bad, Ukraine Has Lost! Cdre Steve Jermy. John Healey Shelves His Own Defence Target UK Chancellor John Healey will officially delay his own target of increasing Britain’s defence spending to 3% of GDP by 2030 in his upcoming October 28 budget. This fiscal reversal has drawn sharp criticism across UK media, particularly on platforms like GB News, where military commentators such as retired Royal Navy Commander Steve Jermy and other analysts have flagged the move as a major policy contradiction.Context of the ControversyThe Resignation: In June 2026, Healey dramatically resigned as Defence Secretary under Prime Minister Keir Starmer. He stepped down on principle, publicly reprimanding the administration for failing to commit to the 3% target to counter rising international threats. The Promotion: Following a subsequent leadership collapse that saw Starmer replaced by Andy Burnham, Healey was appointed Chancellor of the Exchequer in July 2026. Defence advocates expected his Treasury takeover to guarantee robust military funding.The U-Turn: Instead, citing a £5 billion equipment funding shortfall inherited from the previous administration, Healey’s first budget will prioritize patching existing financial gaps rather than expanding the defense baseline. Decisions regarding the timeline for the 3% GDP target have been kicked down the road to next year’s Treasury spending review. Chancellor John Healey has insisted he is “100 per cent” committed to defence after delaying his own three per cent of GDP target. The former Defence Secretary, who dramatically resigned from Sir Keir Starmer’s Cabinet after the then-Prime Minister refused to commit to a three per cent target by 2030, has shot down allegations of hypocrisy as he visited the US for a meeting with foreign counterparts. Mr Healey’s first budget is set for October 28 – but the defence commitments will not be set until next year’s spending review. He has, however, warned that filling a £5billion funding hole would force the Government to make “difficult decisions” in next month’s budget. The Chancellor admitted that his new position on Andy Burnham’s frontbench was a “bigger job”, but insisted defence was central to next year’s spending review. “For the first time at the spending review, we will set out a clear path about how we will meet that Nato commitment in 2035: 3.5 per cent of GDP,” he told The Times. Britain has come under increased pressure from the US to spend more on defence amid global conflicts, namely the Iran war and Russian invasion of Ukraine. Washington has called for Europe and Canada to take increase spending and take further responsibility for defending the European continent in a plan dubbed “Nato 3.0” Donald Trump is now reviewing his position on the Falkland Islands as a way of “encouraging the sort of burden-sharing that we seek”.

Douglas Mc Gregor – Yugoslavia clip. Then we need to understand that President Clinton was just not interested. Yeah, he was never interested in anything beyond America’s borders. Unfortunately, he was surrounded by people like Gore and Albbright. I think Warren Christopher was lukewarm. Uh but then you had Sandy Burgerer and Strobe Talbot, the deputy secretary of defense. And of course, General Clark was friends with all of these people and they were all of a similar ideological mindset that this was the beginning of something very big. And what I was going to tell you is that in December of uh 1998, it was made clear to me that this was the beginning of a revolution, what they call the democratic revolution that’s going to spread from Yugoslavia all the way to Moscow. And that was the first time that I heard openly the statement that this was this was the beginning of something that would go all the way to Moscow. And I was I was stunned because again, you know, I did know a little bit about the history of the region. And my immediate response when I was in the war plans division in 1995 as a war planner, I was asked to write a position paper on what should we do or not do in the Balkans. I said we should stay out. I said, “This is an area of traditional Russian influence, and if we were to in involve ourselves there, it would be viewed as potentially threatening to Russian interests.” And I talked about the special relationship between the Serbs and others and and the Russians really back to 1879 and earlier. Of course, you know, the chief of staff loved it. He sent it over to the White House. It died. That was 1995. There was never Shal Kashi. Are you friends of Charlie Kashili? the chief of the army was Gordon Sullivan. I see and he said, “Yeah, this makes sense. Everybody in the army side because the last thing we want to do is go over there.” Now, one thing I need to point out, there was one person in the Clinton administration who absolutely did not sign on for all of this. That was Secretary Perry, the Secretary of Defense. H and at one point he said to general clerk he was giving he asked he was giving guidance on what we should or shouldn’t do with the Dayton accords if they and he said remember a bad agreement is no agreement is better than a bad agreement that was the first thing so if we can’t get agree that’s all right we you know secondly we don’t want any u dunic corridors in other words we don’t want any unstable unmaintained a mainable territorial outcomes. They’re going to invite future violence and so forth. And then finally, he said, “We don’t want any agreement that involves a commitment of US ground forces on the ground in the Balkans.” Well, what did we get? Well, we got all that we didn’t want. We got this long strip of land out to Shreza. It’s made no sense.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1pKlc9ndNSs&t=648

Steve Jermy – service industry capitalism. Steve Jermy and Douglas Mc Gregor. I was talking about the fundamentals of military uh power and it seemed to me um on a slightly different page here to John Mirshime. The two critical things I used to say were industrial capacity and uh energy. Uh and you needed both to actually run a war. And the the famous quote I used was from Yamamato who was the admiral who um you know oversaw the early days of the war. And he said, “Anybody who has been to the oil fields of Texas or the automobile factories of Ohio knows that we can never win a long-term war with the United States.” And he was right, of course. [snorts] But I think we’ve lost sight of that. The thing I add now to there’s a third element which we’re also lacking in which is the ability to think strategically and clearly and we’ve just lost that completely. But I think the the two other things that I’ve come to realize are also applying into this. The first is that I think um certainly for United States but also to a lesser extent for Britain we have sort of armies which are we have armed forces which are configured more for air se um rather than land. And of course, the primary um opponents at the moment that we’ve mistakenly chosen are configured the other way around, but they’re also configured in a way where they can deny us Siority and they can deny us C control. And that’s a very very fundamental change. Um there’s another thing that’s I think it’s also very interesting which is to pick up on your point Doug that um people say no we need to spend more money and I keep saying well surely we should work out why we want to spend the money and the second thing is we should work out if the money is being well spent. Now if you listen to professor Michael Hudson he’ll distinguish between on the one hand um industrial capitalism which he says is what happens in Russia and China and the other hand um sort of service um services capitalism uh financial capitalism I’m sorry is the word he used which what happens in the west you know so we’ve got most of our GDP is made up of services which is fine unless you want to fight a war and so I think we get particularly poor value for money in the west and the way we spend money. I’m on defense. I’m not 100% sure why, but I’m pretty sure I’m right because I look at the force structure that we’ve got at the moment. I just take my own service, the Royal Navy. Yeah, we’re spending probably a little bit less than we were, but we’ve got 12 hulls, I suppose, at Ferguson destroyers versus 70 when I was serving, you know, and that’s that matters because um you know, the numbers do actually matter if you want to to use forces at sea. There a whole range of range of reasons for that but they matter. So I think that the the idea that we can just spend more money and that the problem I mean forget it forget it. Think about really how we spend the money and what we’re going to spend the money for and also where are we investing. I won’t I’m just about to stop but of course one of the issues is NATO and I’m just doing an article which is about how we should be we should be retiring NATO uh because we don’t get good value for money investment we make in NATO and it doesn’t work.

Vladimir Goldstein – problems with neo Nazis in Ukraine. Wedding attacked in Iran. #2 – EXCLUSIVE Prof Vladimir Golstein on Trump Putin CIA Ratcliffe visit to Moscow Russian Culture – 00:20:00

Trump says reporters traitors who say there’s shortages of missiles. Trump denies US weapons shortage and says information ‘leakers’ being ‘hunted down’

Ayn Rand – Israelis more sophisticated than Arabs. 1950s-70s US Zio-Fascist Ayn Rand: I think the United States foreign policy has been disgraceful for years for decades I would say roughly since the New Deal and in part even before that but if you mean whose side should one be on Israel or the Arabs I would certainly say Israel because than because it’s the advanced technological civilized country amidst a group of almost totally primitive Savages who have not changed for years and who are racist and who resent Israel because it’s bringing industry and intelligence in modern technology into their stagnation your philosophy of objectivism that’s right I just have one point that I think should be made M random with time fleeting here I’m your characterization of uh the situation in the Middle East came down rather gratuitously and in a in a very uh Angry way on the Arabs and without discussing the merits of either side in a most complicated and painful Collision of cultures and peoples in our in our world why can’t why couldn’t the uh the men the millions of men women and children who are Arab and who find themselves in this desperate conflict and look around wondering when where peace will be why can’t they be angry with you for your characterization of them your your slap at them your roundhouse criticism of them when you don’t seem to be able to tolerate a questioner who suggests that she disagrees with you character is

Defence Authorisation Act (DAA) – US and Israeli military merged. House Passes 2027 NDAA With Section to Integrate US and Israeli Militaries The bill passed in a 216-212 vote, with six Democrats supporting it and seven Republicans voting no The House on Wednesday passed its version of the massive $1.15 trillion 2027 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), which includes Section 219 (formerly Section 224), a provision to further integrate the US and Israeli militaries, a scheme Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has described as “my plan.” The NDAA passed largely along party lines in a 216-212 vote. Seven Republicans voted against it, and two didn’t vote, meaning that the Democrats could have blocked the legislation, but six Democrats voted yes on the sweeping military spending bill despite President Trump’s continued war against Iran, which was launched without congressional authorization. The Democrats who voted for the bill include Reps. Henry Cuellar (TX), Donald G. Davis (NC), Jared F. Golden (ME), Vicente Gonzalez (TX), Adam Gray (CA), and Marie Gluesenkamp Perez (WA). The Republicans who voted against the legislation include Reps. Thomas Massie (KY), Chip Roy (TX), Anna Paulina Luna (FL), Harriet M. Hageman (WY), Elijah Crane (AZ), Tim Burchett (TN), and Josh Brecheen (OK). The vote came after the House Rules Committee didn’t allow a vote on an amendment introduced by Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY) to strip Section 219 from the NDAA. Rep. Ro Khanna (D-CA), who supported Massie’s effort, has said he would “fight to strip this amendment in the conference between the House and the Senate,” when the two chambers negotiate the final NDAA. The Senate’s version of the NDAA also includes a provision to integrate the two militaries, but the legislation was blocked by Senate Democrats last week over President Trump’s war with Iran, which hasn’t been authorized by Congress and has continued despite both chambers passing a concurrent War Powers Resolution directing the president to end the conflict.

Tornado in a Junk Yard. The Elite Don’t Want You To Know: GOD IS REAL – Here’s the Proof. SGTreport 2,977,999 views 22 Jun 2016 The global elite are now in the process of unveiling that which they have been hiding for centuries. There is a spiritual war taking place on planet earth at this very moment. Look no further than the Goothard Tunnel opening ceremony on June 1st in Switzerland. The nearly $9 million dollar occult riddled ritual featured Baphomet copulating with human women, the bride of satan giving birth, all seeing eyes and an endless amount of other Satanic symbology. Meanwhile over at CERN’s Large Hadron Collider project in the same country we see Shiva the God of Destruction standing proudly in front of CERN’s headquarters. And the CERN movie ‘Symmetry’ makes their aims perfectly clear, they are actively trying to break the barrier between that which is seen and unseen. Again, the elite seem Hell bent on ushering in their NWO Beast system and at this point they have stopped hiding it. Would it really surprise any of you who understand this information if you were to find out the Darwin’s theories on the Origins of Species are also nothing more than lies based on deplorably bad “science” in order to get the world’s population to dismiss the notion of a Creator altogether? If the elite could get the whole world to believe this beautiful planet and all who inhabit are nothing more than a random accident, they could get humanity to lower its spiritual shields thereby making it far easier to usher in the global system they seek, helmed by the one they secretly serve, Satan. Spiritual warfare on planet earth is alive and well – and you have been lied to. Author James Perloff joins me to deconstruct Darwin. and share proof that God is real.. Some Christians and conservatives think Darwinism is irrelevant — a dry biological theory best confined to science classrooms. This is false. When youngsters from Christian homes read the Bible or go to church, they learn that God created the heavens and Earth, that God created all life forms, and that God created them, in his image, with purpose for their lives. In the public school science classroom, however, these youngsters begin hearing a different story. They are told the heavens and Earth were not created by God, but by a random event, “the Big Bang.” They learn that life was not created by God, but resulted from a random arrangement of chemicals forming the first living cell, in an ocean eons ago. And they learn that they themselves are not purposefully created in God’s image, but simply evolved from fish over millions of years through “natural selection and survival of the fittest.” Any thinking child will now begin to ask a question: “Who’s right? My science teacher or my pastor?” Many begin to say, “Hm, maybe that stuff I’m hearing in church is just baloney. Oh, the pastor, what does he know? He went to a seminary – big deal! These science guys find things out through the scientific method. And if science has proven that evolution is true, then what I’m hearing in church must be phony!” And many of these children begin to consider that church, the Bible, and God Himself are irrelevant. Julian Huxley, perhaps evolution’s foremost spokesman in the twentieth century, stated that “Darwinism removed the whole idea of God as the Creator of organisms from the sphere of rational discussion.” In other words, according to Huxley, even your sanity is in question if you believe in God instead of Darwin. Now I realize a few people say something like this: “Hey, chill out, will you? I believe in evolution and the Bible. What’s wrong with that? Look, it’s simple. The Bible isn’t a science textbook. We’re not supposed to take it literally. Jesus himself spoke in parables — that’s symbolic language, right? So obviously, when the Bible talks about creation, that’s symbolic language for Darwin’s theory of evolution. Adam and Eve were probably just a parable for those ape-men we see in National Geographic.”  

The agreement, signed in Kyiv on Monday, promises new tools for protecting military bases and critical infrastructure while raising quieter questions about data ethics and escalation that mainstream coverage has largely set aside.  —  It’s actually very simple. For UK this is a war of choice. There’s no downside to pulling out. Our sanctions against Russia have already inflicted massive costs and long term severe economic damage to ourselves. Our involvement in this war has been a needless act of self harm and will only become more so. For Russia it’s existential. They cannot allow a hostile, belligerent NATO to establish itself and its nuclear weapons ten minutes flying time from Moscow, or allow the US Navy to take over the Sevastopol naval base. Any more than US would allow China to set up a huge naval base in Tijuana, or allow Russian nuclear missiles in Ottawa. If we keep on pushing and escalating Russia will at some point go nuclear and the UK will face the prospect of destruction. And afterwards any survivors will wonder: why did we do that? UK/Ukraine deal learning a lot about drones from Ukraine war. Britain Gets Access to Ukraine Battlefield Data to Train AI Defense Systems By Newsmax Wires | Monday, 24 August 2026 Britain is gaining access to a vast trove of Ukrainian battlefield data under a new defense partnership aimed at developing artificial intelligence systems capable of detecting threats and military targets more quickly. Prime Minister Andy Burnham and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy signed the agreement Monday in Kyiv, making Britain the first international partner to gain access to Ukraine’s Avengers AI Labs, according to the British government and Reuters. Avengers was built around an annotated database of about 5 million battlefield images, largely drawn from Ukraine’s DELTA combat system, which combines information from cameras and sensors to provide battlefield awareness, Reuters reported. The data includes imagery and information on Russian tanks, artillery, air-defense systems, troops, drones, and other battlefield targets collected during the war. Ukraine’s Defense Ministry says AI models trained on the data are already being used in automated target-detection systems that analyze more than 100,000 drone video feeds each month and identify about 70% of enemy targets in real time, Reuters reported. British researchers and technology companies will now be able to work with the Ukrainian data to develop new defense and security applications. One of the first projects will combine Ukrainian battlefield data with British technology to turn buried fiber-optic cables into a giant AI-enabled sensor capable of detecting and classifying movement around sensitive sites, according to the British government. The technology is being tested at a British defense site and is intended to help identify protesters or hostile actors attempting to approach military facilities or gather intelligence, according to British officials. The government said the technology could eventually be used to protect airports, prisons, railways, and energy infrastructure. Britain is particularly interested in Ukraine’s experience detecting drones and other threats after more than four years of combat with Russia. The partnership also includes research into low-power AI chips that could be used in future drones, robotics, and autonomous systems, the British government said. Three British technology companies — Sintela, Mind Foundry, and Skyral — are participating in the initial pilot projects, according to the government. The agreement gives British researchers access to battlefield data generated under real combat conditions, potentially allowing them to train AI systems using examples of the drones, armored vehicles, artillery, and other threats Ukraine has encountered in its war with Russia. The British government said the partnership will initially focus on defense and national-security projects that bring together researchers, engineers, technology companies, and military experts from both countries. The deal represents a significant expansion of technology cooperation between Britain and Ukraine, combining Ukraine’s battlefield experience and data with British expertise in artificial intelligence, sensors, and autonomous systems.

Radio4All download pages
COMPLETE SHOW AND FULL INTERVIEWS [right click to download]
#1 – Complete 4hr show – [right click to download]
Full interviews with…
#2 – EXCLUSIVE Prof Vladimir Golstein on Trump Putin CIA Ratcliffe visit to Moscow Russian Culture – 00:20:00
#3 – Andy Burnham’s first PMQs Prime Ministers Questions 02Sep26 – 00:45:00
#4 – Peter Hitchens, Britain is dead, Im writing its obituary Brendan ONeil – 00:30:00
#5 – Paul Burgess, The Peoples Emergency Briefing, pure propaganda, Climate Realism – 00:10:00
#6 – ANALYSIS SBU v GUR Kiev Security Intelligence shoot-out, BBC James Landale, RT Marina Kosareva – 00:10:00
#7 – Col Douglas Macgregor, The Blueprint for WW3, What Really Happened In Yugoslavia 1:10:00
#8 – Col Douglas Macgregor Cdre Steve Jermy, 2 NATO defeats in 4 Years, Now were too broke to fight – 01:00:00
#9 – Leipzig Incident Russia allegedly attacks Germany EUs Ursula Von der Leyen and NATOs Mark Rutte – 00:10:00
#10 – Andrei Martyanov SBU vs GUR Security Intelligence Kiev gunfight, Bussification Ukraines Press Gangs 03Sep26 – 00:35:00
#11 – Steve Keen economist warns of oil and AI bubble serious threat to global economy 00:20:00
#12 – RN Cdre Steve Jermy Chancellor John Healey Shelves His Own Defence Target GB News – 00:07:00
#13 – Max Blumenthal Netanyahu The Islamic Republic of Britain – 00:25:00
#14 – OCCULT God vs Darwin Creation v Evolution Tornado in a Junkyard James Perloff SGT Report (2020) – 00:40:00

The Bristol Politics Show CANCELLED and attempts to intimidate us

July 2024 – Tony, Dave and Martin’s NOT The BCfm Politics show was CANCELLED/EVICTED from their PRSC studio in a no fault, no notice, no appeal, eviction by Chloe Slater of The People’s Republic of Stokes Croft (PRSC) arts centre – An email from Chloe and Keith Cowling explained that: ‘Transphobic’ leaflets, which we were not shown, had been left in the building by a recent guest (who denied it) making Transsexual users of the building feel ‘offended’ and ‘unsafe’. To quote: ‘Please let us know when you or Dave would like to come and retrieve your equipment and drop off your keys. Kind regards’ PRSC Directors (Keith Cowling, chair) PRSC / Stokes Croft China 17-35 Jamaica St Bristol BS2 8JP. Chloe Slater (formerly young man Jez and now self-defined as ‘she’) also made it difficult for us to retrieve the last of our equipment by inferring we couldn’t be trusted, we were made to wait in the cold outside their building for over 30 minutes to return their mixing desk and retrieve our remaining kit in December 2024. 

[UPDATE channel restored by YT in July 2025] October 2022 – Tony’s Public Enquiry Channel opened in March 2008, with 13 million views, over 1,600 videos and 26,000 subscribers is removed under false pretences by YouTube – A video Tony recorded in New Zealand ‘Bill Gates, ID2020 & Revelation: Quaker Tony Gosling on Covid 19 & the Bible’ and uploaded on 8th April 2020 got a ‘third strike’ but YouTube’s ‘medical misinformation’ regime was introduced in September 2021 so should not have included as ‘strikes’ videos uploaded before that date.  Documentary makers are just about the only public interest investigators left in the NATO zone. From the top down, our mainstream media, police, political parties & intelligence services are being compromised by feudal banksters, secret societies and the mafia. Key people intimidated by psychopathic black magic types and their pliable drones who will even kill to take over positions of power? Just search for “John Scarlett” and “Dodgy Dossier” and you’ll see what I mean. The Zionists are every bit as fundamentalist and twisted as the leaders and followers of ISIS. Register here and join us in the discussion as we wriggle free of the psychopaths, back to sanity http://www.911forum.org.uk

March 2020 – BCfm’s weekly Politics Show presented by Tony Gosling with Irish Republican Labour activist Martin Summers was forced off FM, now online only by station manager Pat Hart. He decided the show should be ‘rested, due to the pandemic’ on 24 March 2020 and then refused to communicate at all when we requested to do the show remotely. Bristol Community FM (BCfm) charity ‘CEO’ Patrick Hart is a long-time personal friend of Bristol’s all-powerful right-wing ‘Labour’ mayor Marvin Rees. Pat Hart has a private property portfolio on the continent and also does Public Relations work for property speculators who are taking over community facilities such as Redfield Cinema. Now on Internet only NOT The BCfm Politics Show is available 17:00-c. 20:00 live on Fridays. Pat Hart replaced us with a dumbed-down student show repeating MSM stories called The Bristol Agenda. If you’d like to share your views on his deliberate dumbing-down and pro-Covid jab mismanagement you can contact UK broadcasting regulator Ofcom or BCfm board chair and the ‘Don’ himself, here.

February 2019 – Ofcom complaint result: UKLFI exposed as creation of Israeli foreign ministry – Bristol Post article: BCfm cleared after being reported to Ofcom for anti-semitic conspiracy theories – It could have resulted in BCfm radio station being shut down if the complaint was upheld Tony Gosling reported to Ofcom by UK Lawyers for Israel after being accused of anti-semitism A Bristol radio station, which had one of its programmes reported for anti-semitism and racism has been cleared by Ofcom. The radio regulatory body received a complaint from “UK Lawyers for Israel’ over a show on BCfm radio, hosted by investigative journalist Tony Gosling. The weekly politics show, on the popular community radio station based in Easton, was reported for several allegations on a show which aired on November 23. Tony Gosling, who was a former BBC journalist between 1989 and 1993, has been producing and presenting ‘The Tony Gosling Politics’ show every week on BCFM radio for 11 years. They have released a statement which reads: “Whilst we are supportive of all our volunteer presenters, The Tony Gosling Politics Show only represents approximately ten percent of our political output content wise, and less than two per cent of our entire weekly output.” Mr Gosling’s programme looks at local politics and he interviews a range of councillors and MPs in the city. The show is also perhaps more well known for its alternative look at international politics, and he has a cult following online from across the world. Mr Gosling has made regular appearances on national media including the politics show with Andrew Neil on BBC One, and international channels such as Russia Today, Channel1 Russia, NTV, and recently for both Turkish and Lebanon TV.

November 2012 – Tony gets death threats on the phone from the Jewish Defence League – ‘you’re a dead man walking’ – a man calls him and Tony records the call. Audio of UK Jewish Defence League (JDL) death threat against British journalist Tony Gosling (2012) – Avon and Somerset police Special Branch investigate, trace the caller, and after six months report to Tony that the individual has been served a caution that they will proceed with a prosecution for harassment under the 1861 offences against the person act. Seems pretty clear this death threat was issued alongside the lies, copied below, which were published on their blog by London based UK JDL in November 2012.  Firstly Tony Gosling is not a ‘homophobe’. That accusation was first made in an article published by the ‘Harry’s Place’ blog, penned by Zionist David Toube and propelled by him anonymously into Private Eye in 2008. It refers to Gosling’s criticism of senior teachers at Bannerman Road Primary school in Bristol who used homosexual early learning picture books against the express wishes of the parent governors. His criticism was about the deception by teaching staff not because of the homosexual content of the books. Secondly, if you follow the JDL link you’ll find what Tony Gosling actually says about the ‘Protocols Of The Learned Elders Of Zion’ says “…I don’t think there is much doubt that the Protocols are fake…” Thirdly he is not a member of Bristol Palestine Solidarity Campaign and has never been to any of their meetings.

Autumn 2014 – Tony’s documentary production and distribution business shut down by its bank. Our thriving Co-op business bank account ordered closed for undisclosed reasons. Tony Gosling and Ben Edwards founded i-Contact Video Network to distribute documentaries on VHS video and DVD and to make their own documentaries as well as attend news events and sell video footage to TV news channels. Amongst the films we distributed were Operation Solstice, Coconut Revolution, Mark Purdey and Organophosphates, McLibel, 9/11 In Plane Site, Ludicrous Diversion and The Battle of Trafalgar. These, plus books, and even a board game about drug dealing ‘Dollars and Dibble’, were all available via mail order and we supplied libraries around the world too. The bank had clearly been ordered to investigate us for money laundering, although they never admitted it. All the questions they asked Ben and I were about proving our identity through passports etc.. When we did, yet more letters kept arriving demanding more proofs, birth certificates etc. and eventually when one of us missed supplying the required information, within a week or so of being asked, the account was summarily closed and we got a cheque made out to one of us with the few hundred pounds that was in the business bank account. Since neither of us could get a business bank account up and running for at least a few months and the bank account meant nobody could any longer use the website, we made the reluctant decision to shut it down. Thus was a thriving business killed off by the Co_operative bank. Having said that, co-op were not quite the worst. We did apply to open an account at Bristol’s ‘ethical’ Triodos bank, who proceeded to string us along for several months and then said our business was too risky for them to provide an account! 

MP3 of Friday 28th August 2026 show [right click to download] (from c. 11pm) This week’s full interview mp3s, bottom of page. SHOW STARTS 17:00 London time FOR c. 4 HRS TO c. 20:50 – OUR LIVE STREAM to Listen live online. Alt. live stream, DJ Plug Radio OR Download Show After Transmission HERE. Repeats 11 & 5 AM & PM daily on our stream
Download NOT THE BCFM POLITICS SHOW APP [ANDROID APP (1)] and [APKPURE (2)] – or the [Apple App store] – PS. You can replace evil Google Play, which effectively banned us, with [the Aurora store]
All time low: 31% trust the UK Press – UK media oligopoly TONY’S BOOKS: Bilderberg.org – 2 PAPER–BACKS – TONY’S CHANNELS: Telegram – Bitchute – 911 forum – Radio4All – The Land Is Ours – VK – Twitter/X – Farcebook – Brighteon – Rumble – RT Live on Rumble –  Goebbelsesque YouTube: This show; Public Enquiry; Peter Borenius; i-Contact & Occult Geopolitics

Radio4All mp3 audio files usually available from 23:00 2-4hrs, after TX – we’ll credit you if you rebroadcast. Any probs. mp3s should be on alternative links below by then

Paul McDonnell from Reform, Wells and Mendip Hills, joins Tony and Martin online. Problems with UK – finances, universities, housing, health. COVID group think – lockdowns, jabs good – including celebrity endorsement. Paul MacDonnell was the head of European policy at the Center for Data Innovation, an affiliate of the Information Technology and Innovation Foundation. Prior to joining the Center, MacDonnell represented Insurance Ireland, the insurance industry trade association, in Dublin and Brussels, and managed the industry’s response to policy, legislative, and regulatory developments. MacDonnell began his career with Hill & Knowlton’s government affairs division in London where he provided advice to a number of Fortune-500 companies. In 2001 he cofounded an economic policy forum in Dublin, Open Republic, which, as well as hosting events aimed at policymakers and politicians on such issues as pensions, taxation and the EU, was the Irish publisher of the Economic Freedom of the World Report. MacDonnell has extensive broadcast and print media experience, and he holds a degree in medieval English literature and philosophy from Trinity College Dublin and an M.B.A. from University College Dublin. General Election 2024: Reform candidate calls Tories ‘destructive left wing organisation’ Paul MacDonnell, who is standing in North East Somerset and Hanham, says the Conservatives were “certainly to the left of the Labour Party of the 1970s The Reform candidate standing against Jacob Rees-Mogg has called the Conservatives a “destructive left wing organisation.” Article continues below Paul MacDonnell, who is standing in North East Somerset and Hanham, told the Local Democracy Reporting Service he is a “dispassionate conservative” and an “anti-authoritarian.” He said he decided to stand for Reform UK because he thinks the government has given power away to unelected organisations, such as the courts. He added that was concerned about “growing authoritarianism” within organisations. He said: “We have people in human resources departments setting out protocols and policies which are increasingly dominating people’s working lives and in fact can become instruments of bullying around their political opinions if you are forced into diversity, equality, inclusion dogmas that organisations are now promoting.” He also thinks that free speech has been restricted in Britain, adding: “I’m opposed to hate speech laws.” Based in Wells, Mr MacDonnell’s background is in think tanks on public policy. He said: “Policy in Britain is just not made that well. We need to consult think tanks and people like that, and people who study problems.” He said that standing for Parliament and speaking to voters had been “amazing” for someone interested in public policy. He said: “It’s a fairly humbling experience because you realise no matter how well read you are about something or how firm your views, when you encounter people, you realise that’s the fundamental data you are dealing with of people’s lives…

Did Dolly Parton die from a turbo-cancer from the experimental Moderna MRna jab she helped finance? She was a great singer songwriter, but maybe shouldn’t have endorsed experimental jabs. well hey it’s me i’m finally going to get my vaccine i’m so excited i’ve been waiting a while i’m old enough to get it and i’m smart enough to get it so i’m very happy that i’m going to get my modernist shot today and i wanted to tell everybody i think you should get out there and do it too i haven’t changed one of my songs to fit the occasion it goes vaccine vaccine vaccine vaccine i’m begging of you please don’t hesitate vaccine vaccine vaccine vaccine cause once you’re dead then that’s a bit too late here i go all right i think you got it i got it okay i didn’t hurt just stung a little bit but that was from the alcohol pad i think yeah right okay all right now mess up my beauty mark okay i’m joking you do what you got to do i don’t want blood on my clothes you

Russia threatening to bomb UK. Restore UK, Henry Bolton, Security – British foreign policy. Police arresting Palestine Action protesters but not thieves. Tokenism – racism, sexism. Russia threatens to bomb UK military bases over support for Ukraine Russia warns Britain is ‘playing with fire’ by supplying Storm Shadow missile technology to Ukraine Russia has warned it could strike British military targets over the UK’s support for Ukraine. Russia’s foreign ministry spokesperson told the UK to back off on what she called London’s hostile stance on the war, which she said risked taking the conflict to an entirely new level. Maria Zakharova told the same Moscow news briefing earlier that Britain and France were “playing with fire” by supplying sensitive missile technology to Ukraine. But the Ministry of Defence has hit back, saying Russia “should be in no doubt about the resolve of this government to stand against Russian aggression, in Ukraine and against the UK and our allies.” Britain announced on Monday it would allow Kyiv access to classified technology to start its own production of Storm Shadow long-range cruise missiles, capable of carrying out strikes deep within Russia. France has already given its assent to licence the technology for the European missile. That decision has drawn strong condemnation from Russia, with president Vladimir Putin’s spokesperson Dmitry Peskov saying it would add “fuel to the fire” of the conflict. But Andy Burnham told reporters in Kyiv during a visit earlier this week: “Who started the fire? That’s the question, isn’t it?” Russian intervention comes as tensions between the Kremlin and Downing Street continue to escalate, a week after Russia’s embassy in the UK said reports that Ukrainian forces had used unmanned aircraft manufactured by two UK companies “confirm that London is deliberately opting for an escalation of the Ukraine crisis”. But former ministers have said Mr Burnham must not flinch in the face of the threats. Former foreign secretary Sir Malcolm Rifkind told The Independent: “This is probably usual sabre-rattling from Russia. “It is not impossible they might try a significant cyber attack or something military to appear macho. If they do, they should remember that the UK has offensive cyber capability and could use it!” Former defence secretary Grant Shapps said: “The real Russian threat to this country is not a missile over Hertfordshire – it is sabotage, cyberattacks and hybrid operations against our defence industry, our undersea cables and our critical national infrastructure, deniably and by proxy. That is where ministers must harden our defences now, not after the fact. “The answer to intimidation has never been to back away from it. If London flinched every time Moscow rattled the sabre, the sabre would simply be rattled more often, and next time over Poland or the Baltics. 

Russia is poised to attack Britain and has identified drone factory and missile company as ‘legal targets’, ex-Kremlin chief warns – as he describes the UK as ‘evil number one’ : I fear Putin WILL fire a nuclear weapon… but not at one of Nato’s allies Russia is poised to attack Britain – and has singled out a drone factory and a missile company as ‘legal targets’, it was claimed last night. A senior adviser to Vladimir Putin warned that the ‘highest levels of the Russian government’ were considering a ‘hybrid attack’, such as sabotage or arson, rather than an ‘outright military strike’ that would unleash a response from Nato. In an exclusive interview with The Mail on Sunday, Andrei Fedorov, a former deputy foreign minister of Russia, described the UK as ‘evil number one’. Among the Kremlin’s targets is a drone factory owned by a British-Ukrainian firm, Ukrspecsystems. Details of the company’s premises next to RAF Mildenhall, in West Suffolk, were made public in April alongside five other European firms that make weapons and drones for Ukraine in its war against Russia. On Saturday night, Defence Secretary Wes Streeting said: ‘The reckless rhetoric and attempts at intimidation we have seen from the Kremlin in recent weeks reflects the weakness of Putin’s position and we will not be intimidated. ‘This has been a bad year for Putin. The front line has barely moved. Russian casualties continue to mount. The Russian people are paying a heavy price for Putin’s war. ‘It is also in our national interest that Putin’s aggression must not be rewarded. The Prime Minister, the Foreign Secretary and I are working together to mobilise support for Ukraine ahead of winter.’ The threat comes as: Bosses of British defence companies have been warned they could be targets of Russian hybrid attacks; A pro-Kremlin war channel suggested that a Nato base in Estonia with at least 900 British troops should be attacked; One of the assassins of Russian defector Alexander Litvinenko plans to hold an anti-UK exhibition opposite the British embassy in Moscow; Britain’s ambassador to Russia told officials not to confirm if British weapons are going to Ukraine to prevent an escalation by Putin. On Saturday, Elisabeth Braw, an expert on the Atlantic Council thinktank, said that the point of hybrid attacks is that they put a country like the UK in a dilemma about how to respond. She said: ‘I call hybrid threats the defender’s dilemma because it really is the defender’s dilemma. ‘How exactly are you supposed to hit back because if you were to use military means, then you would really cause World War Three.’ Fedorov, 71, said that the Kremlin would not launch an outright military strike against Britain, a Nato member, because it could lead to the Western alliance launching a collective military response against Russia. But he added: ‘The UK is evil number one. After the information that UK-made drones were used against Russian oil refineries, this has become a big anger [sic] in Russian society. ‘Various experts are calling to punish by strike [sic] the UK, and it will be supported by the majority of Russian citizens.’ He said that Putin and his cronies were angry Andy Burnham had handed Ukraine blueprints for long-range Storm Shadow missiles, which have been used previously to strike inside Russia.

Gaza genocide or not? Reform UK says not. No war crimes in Gaza, says Nigel Farage’s Israel tsar Jason Pearlman is among several pro-Israel figures behind the party predicted to win big in May elections Israel has not committed a single war crime in Gaza, the head of the newly-formed Reform Friends of Israel has claimed. Speaking to Declassified, Jason Pearlman also described the torture and abuse of Palestinian detainees held in Israeli prisons as “the minutiae of individual claims”. Until December, Pearlman was a media adviser to Israel’s president, Isaac Herzog, who a UN commission found to have incited genocide. Speaking from Israel, where he still lives, he told Declassified that he started a conversation with Reform about turning the party’s ‘Friends of Israel’ group into a “full-time” organisation while he was still working for Herzog. “We did have a dinner with Nigel and some key backers,” he said. “We were able to put seed funding together.” Pearlman refused to say who Reform Friends of Israel’s (RFOI) donors were. But he admitted: “I’m sure some of the people who fund CFI [Conservative Friends of Israel] and LFI [Labour Friends of Israel] will also be funding RFI.” While Jason Pearlman remains an obscure figure in British politics, he stands to become one of the most influential figures on foreign policy, if Nigel Farage’s party wins the next election. He has said he has “great respect” for Benjamin Netanyahu, who is wanted by the International Criminal Court for war crimes. And, when his departure from Israeli politics was announced in December, he was personally thanked by President Herzog. “Jason has helped guide the Office of the President through perhaps Israel’s most challenging times with the international press,” Herzog said. “I am grateful for his tireless efforts to promote understanding of the work of the President of Israel and bring Israel’s story to millions around the world.” When Declassified asked Pearlman if he believed Israel had committed any war crimes since 7 October 2023, he said: “No, of course not.” He added: “The tragedy is that there is no nuance when it comes to discussing this conflict.” Declassified asked if he could think of a single specific case where he would condemn IDF soldiers in Gaza. Pearlman replied: “Probably… [but] I can’t think of anything specifically off-hand.” And when asked about the well-documented abuse and torture of Palestinian prisoners, Pearlman said: “I am sure there is some truth to all of these things…” But he appeared to dismiss such cases in favour of focusing on “the wider perspective of ‘how do we solve these issues?’”…

Should the UK be bombing Russian railways and oil refineries? Reform says yes. Is UK support for Ukraine worth it? Reform has switched position on Ukraine war, as getting more power. BBC Today programme – Andre Federof, Former Deputy Foreign Minister of Russia – Russians want Putin to bomb UK. Russia election 18th September – Putin set to win. Anti-Ukraine post from Reform supporter’s account was unofficial, says party Volodymyr Zelensky has said Ukraine is “ready for elections” if partners can guarantee security A social media post attacking Ukraine from a “Reform UK Alyn and Deeside and Wrexham” account was run by a party supporter with no official position in Reform, the party has said. The post, on Facebook, accuses Ukraine of corruption, says no more money or weapons should be sent to the country and calls for the lifting of sanctions against Russia. Reform said the account was “not official” and that the post was “contrary to our policy”. “We stand fully behind Ukraine against Russia’s brutal invasion,” a spokesperson added. The post, published on Monday, has been condemned by other political parties. The criticisms of Ukraine include labelling it “the most corrupt country on earth” and arguing that there should be no more sending of “money or weapons to the Zelensky regime”. There is also a call to “lift sanctions on Russia and restore normal diplomatic and trading relations”. Welsh Labour leader Ken Skates, a Fflint Wrecsam Senedd member, said he was “astonished” that “we’re seeing yet again Reform backing Putin’s invasion of Ukraine”. Reform leader Nigel Farage has been criticised for arguing that the West provoked the invasion. Two years ago he told BBC Panorama the war was “of course” Mr Putin’s fault, but that the expansion of the EU and Nato had given him a reason to tell the Russian people “they’re coming for us again”. Reform UK Alyn and Deeside and Wrexham is not an official account, says the party Conservative Sam Rowlands, another local MS, said it was a “disgraceful and deeply pro-Russian position from Reform UK” while “Putin continues his illegal war, including killing Ukrainian civilians.” “It is particularly concerning given Reform’s previous Welsh leader Nathan Gill was jailed for over 10 years after accepting illegal bribes to promote Russian interests.” Plaid Cymru Westminster Leader Liz Saville Roberts MP made a similar point, accusing Reform of taking a “stance as a pro-Russian party”. “Rewarding Putin’s aggression is no route to peace and stands in stark contrast to the values of solidarity and compassion we hold in Wales,” she added. Gill was sentenced, late last year, when Reform called his actions “reprehensible, treasonous and unforgivable”. He is thought to have received up to £40,000 to help pro-Russian politicians in Ukraine while he was a member of the European Parliament…

https://youtu.be/fo2GN5ZJtLk&t=22

BBC QT – Peter Hitchins on UK involvement in Ukraine war. The Heritage Party, David Kurten – what sets them apart. Those who feel disillusioned with the current political system, obviously, are right to do so. uh they have been systematically betrayed and I see no end to it. The there are so many issues uh which have been visited on this country by an elite of self- selecting closed-minded people are well represented here this evening and actually largely incompetent as well uh which have done enormous damage to our way of life. So for instance, who now has anything to say about the de-industrialization of this country and the destruction of manufacturing jobs under the Thatcher government? Uh who can reverse it? Who can do anything about it? Who will say anything on this panel about the catastrophe of of mass immigration which has changed this country irrevocably to somewhere completely different from what it was. They won’t talk about it. They won’t talk seriously about the immense problems of crime and disorder which affect millions of people in their homes and leave them utterly vulnerable to all kinds of unpleasantness and and and violence and menace which they never used to have to undergo and and and there is no sense whatsoever that there will be any reform of the criminal justice system or any attempt to put it right again. These are just some of the subjects which this elite on which this elite just constantly constantly refuse to discuss constantly refuse to discuss. Why? Why? Because they themselves have an ideology. They themselves have have the ideology of of of metropolitan bourgeois bohemians. They despise most people outside. What are you man of the people? They despise they despise. Well, I mean, you’re the only person on this panel. I’m no more a man of the people than you are. I don’t I don’t claim to be, but you’re making a I’m saying I’m I’m simply saying these are the things which they will not do anything about, which they will not because they themselves benefit. They themselves benefit from many of the things which which do immense damage. They’ve benefited from globalization. They’ve benefited from mass immigration. Talk about mass immigration. Talk about immigrants coming over here propping up our NHS treating us. They’re not affected. They’re not affected. Their ch their children their children don’t go to bog down comprehensives. Then they’re not affected. They’re not affected by they’re not affected. They’re not affected by crime. Yes, I do know what I’m talking about because I know what they do all the time. They will not discuss these things. They will not do anything about them. They ignore what you say. And you think that at general election time you can do something about it. No. The people who stand before you at general election time for for the for the political parties are people who’ve been pre-selected. You have no control. If I stood for parliament or if he stood for parliament from from our positions which are quite popular. The fact is the party machines would erase us the immense amounts of money they’re capable of spending the enormous access they have to the broadcasting organizations which we don’t have most of the time would make it impossible. Make it impossible more would make it impossible on the contrary would make it impossible for anyone. Sorry. What the question was, what would you say to people who feel like you clearly do political association? I just said it. Well, no, wait a moment. Wait a minute. What would you say to them about how to change things? Are you Are you Are you going to stand as an MP? I’m sorry. Are you Are you going to stand as an MP? No, because for the reasons I’ve just explained, I wouldn’t I wouldn’t have the faintest choice. No, my my advice to anybody young enough to do so is to immigrate before it’s too late.

Electoral Calculus, Martin Baxter- polls – Reform bounce has dissipated – hung parliament. Financial problems coming – AI bubble, wars. General Election Prediction Updated 28 July 2026 Current Prediction: Labour short 82 of majority Prediction based on opinion polls from 07 Jul 2026 to 27 Jul 2026, sampling 13,321 people. Probability of possible outcomes Lab minority 49% Reform minority 16% Con minority 11% Labour majority 10% No overall control 10% Reform majority 2% Conservative majority 1% Probability of being the largest party Labour 58% Reform 25% Conservative 16% The future is never certain. But using our advanced modelling techniques, we can estimate the probability of the various possible outcomes at the next general election. Minority government probabilities assume possible alliances between the Conservative and Reform parties, and between Labour, Liberal Democrats, SNP and Plaid Cymru. In the headline prediction table, the columns ‘Low Seats’ and ‘High Seats’ give the 90 per cent confidence interval for the number of seats won. Commentary for end-July 2026 A definite ‘Burnham bounce’ can be seen in the polling numbers this month. Labour have overturned Reform’s lead, which was 6pc last month, to edge just a fraction ahead. When translated into seats, this puts Labour ahead of the Conservative by over 100 seats, and pushes Reform into third place. Labour would be short of an overall majority, but is close to having a workable coalition with the Liberal Democrats and the Greens. These figures include adjustment for tactical voting, as described here. Also, Richard Rose this month says that Burnham Bowls a Googly to Reform UK.

Peter Hitchins at Oxford Union Debate – UK would rather go to war with Russia than lose Ukraine.  And what did George W. Bush do?” He said, “We’re going to expand NATO into Ukraine.” Although he had been advised by his own ambassador in Moscow and a future CIA chief not to do this, he browbeat Angela Merkel of the Federal Republic of Germany and into supporting this ludicrous initiative and lo and behold, conflict and bitterness spread into Ukraine. Now, when I was in Moscow in the time of the fall of the Soviet Union, of course, I traveled down to Ukraine and you could see perfectly well that here was a country full of people who longed to be free of Soviet power and were very glad to have it out of their out of their lives. And for many, many years after this, it was a reasonably happy, reasonably prosperous, reasonably peaceful country. But once the NATO expansion spread towards it, once the idea became clear that it was to be used as a battering ram in some strange plan to create hostility when none existed, Ukraine began to divide between its east and its west between those in in Ukraine who who were who were fervent nationalists of the old western school and the people in the east who were more sympathetic to a close relation with Russia. And then there was an election in which a president Victor Yanukovic was elected and nobody disputes the result of this election and that president was the one given the moment of decision. The European Union came and said we’re offering you an association agreement and he said actually no thank you. It’s not good enough. It will threaten the people in the in the east who voted for me. He wouldn’t accept it. What happened to him? Do you know? You probably don’t. He was overthrown by an armed mob in one of the most disgraceful undemocratic actions in modern Europe European history. People who are rightly furious about Donald Trump’s mob marching into the US capital when he lost the election don’t even know what happened to Yanukovic. He was over he was offering at the time he was offering early elections and yet the mob overthrew him. The Ukrainian parliament then met broke all its own constitutional rules and removed him. And from then on Ukraine instead of being the happy, reasonably prosperous, contented policy which had been before and also the rather strikingly democratic policy in in in Eastern Europe ceased to be so and move towards a civil war. You might think you might think that the any vote you have tonight won’t have any effect. It won’t really not have any effect. We are already at war with Russia. Are you not aware of this? Do you not know that Western special forces have been in Ukraine for many years? Do you not know the huge piles of weapons which we supply to Ukraine which it couldn’t possibly afford on its own account? Do you know that we help them target their missiles on Russia? Of course you do. And why is Ukraine being chosen for this particular job? Precisely, ladies and gentlemen. Precisely, Madam President, because Ukraine is not in NATO and therefore the war can be pursued without any danger of it leading to a nuclear conflict. That is what is going on. The war is happening. And as for losing Ukraine, another small reminiscence, if I may, about 20 years ago, I went back to Moscow to see what was then the first the first military parade of the Russian armed forces since the end of the Soviet Union. And I watched it with my old friend Igor Mishv whose father had been a Soviet Navy nuclear submarine captain who knew his stuff about military matters. And we watched all this stuff trundling by. And at the end of it, he turned to me and said, “What do you think of our display of strategic scrap metal?” And he was right. The Soviet Union may have been military powerful in its time uh by its own standards. Russia is not a serious conventional military power. It’s one aircraft carrier can’t leave port without a target in case it breaks down and seems to burn vegetable oil to move. It’s it its navy is a is a comical comical display. Its army is drunken, illisiplined, and frankly disgraceful. And in four years of war, it hasn’t been able to take Karkov 20 miles from its border. And you think they’re going to arrive at Calala. The European NATO states already spend without any encouragement from Donald Trump three times as much on armaments as Russia does. And they spend it better and they have better armed forces. This is an imaginary threat. Why are we fighting this war? Fighting this war because of a a deep desire in certain American foreign policy circles to keep Russia down. And this is this is Adam braided in a in a document called the Wolawitz doctrine which I urge you to look up in which the whole idea was put forward that Russia could not be allowed to rise again…

RIP Ratco Mladic, Bosnian Serb general who faced down armed Croats & Muslims, Miodrag Zarkovic atco Mladic, former Yugoslav Colonel, known as ‘The Butcher of Bosnia’, dies in prison. C4 Lindsay Hilsum – Ratco saying it’s a NATO plot. Yugoslav war – complex. Nikola Dragovic, a Serbian film director who co-directed the acclaimed documentary ‘I Pledge’ (Zaklinjem Se) in 2020 – history of Ratco Mladic and Yugoslav war. Martin’s experience of working for CAFOD running up to Yugoslav war. NATOs operations in Yugoslav war. Milosavic killed, Praljak commits suicide in court live. Ratco Mladic was born in Bosnia. He was a Yugoslav citizen because that was part of Yugoslavia back then, but he was born in Boston actually in the middle in in the very central part of Bosnia. You you don’t get more Bosnian than his native town of Kalino. and u he was uh so all three sides are native of Bosnia. They they it was a classical civil war. It there there was no aggression from Serbia. Actually if there was aggression it was from the creation side because the Croatian army in at least two um examples uh invaded Bosnian territory at the beginning of the war in the early spring of 92. Uh so uh uh of all the three sides, not only that the servers were the only one to get the large portion of the blame, but I will now quote Indian General Satish Nambir. She was, I believe, for more than a year, the commander of the UN peacekeeping forces in Bosnia during the war, during the last stage of the war. and he wrote a public letter um if I recall correctly somewhere late in 95 so 31 years ago where he said we knew that all three sides were committing atrocities and war crimes but unlike Cros and Muslims Serbs were the only one who didn’t try to fool us to trick us to to to play dumb with us. So if he said in a letter, if we were if we found a village, Ser village or a corrupt village that was uh practically massacred by Boston forces and we knew that was that as a fact for a state of fact, you know, but when we would confront Bosnian army with that, they would no no we didn’t do it. If we were to find a Serb or a Muslim village that was massacred by creation forces and we confronted confronted creation forces forces with that fact, they were like, “No, no, no, we didn’t do it.” As opposed to that. If there was a creation or a Muslim village that was massacred by Serbs and we confronted Serbs about that, Serbs were like, “Maybe we did that.” So that’s another distinction between the Serbian side and the other two sides. Now as uh as for the hack tribunal, the hack tribunal officially brought up charges against Rad Kumadish who was the head commander commander-in-chief of the Bostonian Serb army and Radan Karaj who was the president of Republic of Serbska that’s the Serbian entity uh inside Boston. So uh uh the hack tribunal brought up official charges against the two of them in 96. I believe the main witness maybe even the only witness on that bringing up of the charges was Draan Erdo an ethnic who was also a mercenary and who fought somehow managed to fight for all three sides in the civil war. first for I believe uh Bostonian cross then for Bostonian mos Muslims and then at the end for Bostonian service when he surrendered to the hack tribunal and he surrendered not because he wanted to come clear with his conscience or whatever. No, he had some trouble with other mercenaries. He was even wounded in a gunfight. They were arguing over money of course

Don DeBar, journalist, joins Tony and Martin from New York. John Ratcliffe, CIA, goes to Moscow – why? Elections in US. Trump’s US. War with Iran. Secret CIA Visit to Moscow: Signal of an Immanent Coup vs. Trump? I wonder if the unannounced trip by the head of the CIA to visit the Kremlin signals that a coup is coming here in the US against Trump. Or, in other words, was the purpose of the trip for the CIA to assure the Kremlin that a removal of Trump from office would not signal an escalation of the Ukraine war – or that a first strike was about to begin – as a consequence? I believe the elite is divided on the tactical approach to the shared strategic goal of world domination. I believe Trump may represent one faction that would rather consolidate power in the Western Hemisphere first (e.g., disassemble the resistance to US power here) and then await a more favorable position in the international sphere, engaging from a position of unchallenged power. I think the rise of the East may be taking the sand out from under his feet, at least in the eyes of some parts of the other faction(s). During the (so called) Cuban Missile Crisis, Kennedy declined to make a rapid transfer of senior leadership (LeMay, et al) at the Pentagon, as some of his advisors suggested. The record show that he feared the Soviets would see this as a response to a coup attempt and decide that perhaps a first strike was coming, a very dangerous condition for all. If that’s the thinking among the top circles today, where the situation on the global stage is even more precarious and, by any measure, more dangerous, this trip would be one way of alleviating that possible interpretation of events if there were plans underway to do something that could seem unusual from the outside. The hasty removal of Trump, particularly after the recent bizarre staging of his shipping crate escapade and the various assassination attempt(s) and/or “plots” against him, would likely appear as unusual in their eyes.

Harley Schlanger, from Larouche in Potsdam, joins Tony and Martin. CIA roles and disagreements. Russia won’t attack UK. C4 News, Matt Frei – CIA/MI6 officer John Foreman – will Russia bomb UK? Harley Schlanger, a spokesman for the LaRouche movement and the Schiller Institute based in Potsdam, Germany. Schlanger engaged in a wide-ranging discussion on global geopolitics, which highlighted several key topics:Intelligence Agencies & Disagreements: He analyzed the evolving roles of the CIA, MI6, and Mossad, examining internal rifts and controversial ties (including references to the Epstein and Maxwell networks).Russia-UK Relations: Addressing heightened international tensions, Schlanger argued against mainstream claims, stating his view that Russia will not attack or bomb the UK.The Shift in Global Power: He detailed what he describes as the ongoing collapse of traditional European colonialism, leaving the global financial systems centered heavily around the City of London and Wall Street facing a systemic shift toward Eastern entities like China and Russia.  Who Is Pushing for Nuclear War? International Peace Coalition, Week 168 Aug. 21—On August 21 the International Peace Coalition (IPC) held its 168th consecutive weekly meeting which Helga Zepp-LaRouche, founder of the Schiller Institute and initiator of the IPC said may be our most important meeting ever. Two regional wars threaten to go out of control, and the use of tactical nuclear weapons is now a topic for casual discussion. This has been recently confirmed by former U.S. Congresswoman Majorie Taylor Greene who said that she is not guessing when she says that there is an open discussion in the Pentagon, or in the President Donald Trump administration, of using tactical nuclear weapons, but rather she knows from direct sources that this is a live discussion. Elbridge Colby, the so-called “U.S. Under Secretary of War for Policy,” has confirmed on the record that the Pentagon is re-examining U.S. nuclear employment guidance in order to give the President what he calls “rational nuclear options” in a regional conflict with Russia or China—and he maintains that, unlike U.S. Nuclear Posture Reviews, this does not need to be approved by Congress or even be made public. Zepp-LaRouche said that President Trump should admit that he has lost the war in Iran, but instead he is vacillating between saying he is talking to the Iranians and saying there are no talks—most recently warning of crushing sanctions against Iran and any country working with them.

Ongoing collapse of European colonialism, just left with City of London and Wall St. CIA, MI6, Mossad – Epstein, Maxwell. Tech sector. China, Russia. …, Iran has survived 47 years of sanctions, and it is the United States which is bankrupt with the federal deficit now passing the $40 trillion mark. According to media reports, Iranian officials threatened to attack U.S. military bases in Europe if the U.S. intensifies the war. Israel continues the genocide in Gaza, but has been committing similar atrocities in the West Bank. But President Trump is unable or unwilling to control Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. The fighting in Ukraine is also escalating, but all of these wars are a consequence of the economic crisis, and the desire by western countries to maintain the 500-year-old colonial system of looting. Zepp-LaRouche stressed the urgency to circulate the letter which appeals to Pope Leo XIV to intervene by calling for a summit of global leaders to address the need of peace and nuclear disarmament. At least two former heads of state have already signed the letter. Ray McGovern, the retired CIA analyst and founding member of Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity (VIPS), said that he started the day this morning the same way he starts every morning—reading the news from EIR. He highly recommended that people read an article by Jason Ross. McGovern questioned how Elbridge Colby could even talk about changing official nuclear doctrines without first consulting with the Russians. McGovern said that he has been watching the Russians and the Soviets before them for over six decades, and said that the Russians are “an open book,” and make their nuclear policy crystal clear. Colby is “still wet behind the ears” with no experience and no understanding of what war is. McGovern used to brief Colby’s father on the Russians. Elbridge Colby wrote that he wants “nuclear superiority,” but McGovern said that this is not possible and that nobody will be superior in a nuclear war, which is why it is called “Mutually Assured Destruction.” McGovern stressed that President Trump is not well physically nor psychologically and could lead the world into a nuclear war either deliberately, accidentally, or by responding to an Israeli “false flag” provocation. This Israeli instigation is how President Trump started the Iran War. Iran controls the Strait of Hormuz which is the equivalent of holding a nuclear weapon. Would Trump respond with a nuclear weapon? Colonel Lawrence Wilkerson recently spoke on the Judging Freedom podcast where he said that the U.S. military leadership would not allow Trump to use nuclear weapons. McGovern said that he prays that Wilkerson is correct, but that there is no assurance. McGovern spoke of several near nuclear incidents such as in 1983 when Soviet Union radar indicated a missile attack, the Russian officer in charge [Lt. Col. Stanislav Petrov] refused to launch a counterattack, knowing that there was a technical problem with the radar system and that there was no threat. Another crisis in Nov. 1983 was averted when the CIA’s Mel Goodman—with whom McGovern said he was proud to work on Soviet foreign policy—bypassed all his superiors and went directly to CIA Director Bill Casey to warn that the White House had to stop ongoing western military exercises which were misunderstood in Moscow to be an attack on the Soviet Union. A third possible incident occurred when President Nixon had been drinking heavily and Kissinger warned military leaders that Nixon was inebriated and should he give orders to launch a nuclear strike the military leaders should first check with Kissinger. McGovern said that we are currently facing a level of danger that he has not seen since the 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis, and he again put the biggest concern on President Trump’s mental state.

Sir Richard Sheriff – MI6 Propagandist for war with Russia – UK military support for Ukraine justified. Vladimir Goldstein – Russia escalating war in Ukraine – Russia in Middle East. Israel proxy for West. Harley does a daily 15 min podcast at thelaroucheorganisation.com.

Crypto Is Holding A Gun To Democracy! Gil Duran, author of ‘Nerd Reich’, on no criticism of billionaires backing tech. Data centres.  Crypto is holding a gun to democracy Gil Duran For years, Donald Trump called crypto a “scam.” Now he’s a crypto billionaire—and the crypto bro-in-chief. Earlier this week, I joined Prem Thakker of Zeteo for a conversation about how crypto fascists are funding the most corrupt White House in American history. The Nerd Reich: Silicon Valley Fascism and The War On Democracy is officially a national bestseller. But this is just the beginning of the fight. Many major news outlets still refuse to touch this subject, and we need to change that. A cult of billionaires is chasing a self-fulfilling prophecy of societal collapse, and they are buying tremendous influence over our government. The people deserve to know. Publishers Weekly: “This transfixing debut from journalist Durán investigates the antidemocratic ideologies espoused by tech billionaires linked to the second Trump administration … It’s an ominous look at an insular elite arrayed against American democracy.” “Gil Durán is an essential voice on this technofascist moment—where it comes from and where we are going.” —Carole Cadwalladr, investigative journalist, The Nerve “A clear and compelling account of the threats posed by technofascism to democracies everywhere.” —Ruth Ben-Ghiat, historian and author of Strongmen: Mussolini to the Present “Reader take note: Gil Durán is a deep, thoughtful, and expansive observer of events that shape the current and future of our American democracy.” —George Lakoff, author of The All New Don’t Think of an Elephant!: Know Your Values and Frame the Debate “The Nerd Reich is a clarion warning about the rise of techno-fascist sociopaths who seek to profit off of our collective misery. In clear, compelling and meticulously-researched detail, Gil Durán sounds the alarm about this incestuous cabal of broligarchs. He brings the receipts and the righteous rage.” —Wajahat Ali, The Left Hook

The Secret Of Data Centres Revealed: Digital Slavery? Catherine Austin Fitts – everyone will be controlled by ‘Stablecoin’ – Genius to pay off government debt. If you and I do a transaction and I want to buy a Tucker Carlson hat and you want to sell it to me, I give you cash, I get the hat. That’s a two lock transaction. You have a lock. I have a lock. If one of us says no, it can’t happen. Okay. Let’s say we have money in the bank and I want to buy the hat. I’m going to transfer money. I’ll do an a to you for the cost of the hat. The bank has rules from the Treasury Department. It has sanctions. It has to know your customer rules. It has other regulations. And it has the ability to intercede and stop the transaction for those reasons. Okay? and and that’s a sort of what I call a manual third lock. So they the bank gets a third lock implementing the government regulations. Um and so if you look at what happened to the truckers in Canada, they had all not all but most of the banks exercise that manual third lock under the direction of the government. What the government wants to do and and what the Treasury and the central banks want is they want an automatic third lock. So you don’t have to go through the bank and not only can you apply sanctions and know your customer and money laundering laws, you can apply a full-blown social credit system, right? So I can make up a hugely complex rule system for Tucker and his kids and his grandkids. I can I can customize it for each one of you and I can give you incentives and I can give you rules and unless you do exactly what I say, I can turn off your money or I can apply negative interest rates to your money or positive interest rates, I can raise your taxes without anybody having any say about it. So, let me give you an example. Go back to the pandemic. If I say you’re locked down and you and your family can’t leave your house, your money won’t work outside your house. If I have an all digital system with an automatic third lock and let’s say I freeze your bank account, you can’t go to your bank and talk to them. It’s above their head. They won’t be implementing it. Okay, that gives them that’s what the data centers are for. That’s what the AI is for, at least in North America. You know, the goal of that because if you if you look at spatial control, it involves uh tremendous data because of the videos and the cameras and you’ve got lots of video footage. But then you can imagine financial transactions all over the world. If they’re going to bring four billion customers from around the world into the dollar markets or the the our stock market, that’s a huge amount of data for spatial and financial control. And and but with AI, what is AI great at? AI is fabulous at processing enormous amounts of mathematical information which is most of the information the data we’re talking about and so if they can put a manual third lock in a social credit system for every individual and and and essentially automate the whole process with AI then then they have the ability in fact to control many many people now here’s the question why would four billion people want to come into that system?

UK leaflet for migrants fiasco – don’t rape women, don’t photograph in public places! Nigel Turner, secretary of the British Press Photographers Association, on the stupidity of the leaflet. UK Home Office must correct advice on photography in public spaces, says NUJ The NUJ is calling on the Home Office to rectify information it has published and shared with asylum seekers on restrictions around photographing and filming people in public places. The information leaflet, posted on the government website on 19 August, makes a misleading blanket claim that people in the UK “could be arrested by the police” if they “take pictures or videos of someone without their permission […] including in public spaces, like streets or parks”. These statements misrepresent the law and risk misleading people on their rights and obligations. Taking photos or videos of people in public without their permission is not inherently unlawful. There are certain contexts in which photography and videos taken and shared without a person’s permission are legally prohibited – for example, voyeurism and upskirting or causing harassment and distress as per the Protection from Harassment Act. There is also a right to redress if a photo or video is taken or published of someone without permission in a private setting or where they have reasonable expectation of privacy. These legal restrictions should be communicated with accuracy and nuance, which are not present in the Home Office’s leaflet. NUJ members working in visual journalism are already experiencing increased obstruction, hostility and routinely deal with people questioning their right to photograph in public. This can even rise to instances of verbal and physical abuse, as has been documented by our Journalists’ Safety Tracker. Séamus Dooley, NUJ assistant general secretary, said: “This communication not only runs the risk of misleading asylum seekers, it could also have serious consequences for our members – particularly photographers and videographers who regularly carry out their work in public places. It also spreads public confusion that could serve to inhibit public interest journalism. Press photographers and other lens-based journalists perform a legitimate and important function in reporting and recording events in public spaces. “The union is very concerned that the spread of inaccurate information around the right to photograph and film people in public without permission could expose our members to increased hostility and harassment as well as wrongful accusations of criminality and unjustifiable stops by the police. This would undermine journalists’ right to report and the public’s right to know. “The NUJ urges the government to amend its publication and will be writing directly to the Home Secretary to raise this issue.”

https://youtu.be/y0anXcBR9VE&t=3290

Fletcher Prouty, CIA Colonel post WW2, on how Nazi spy chief Reinhardt Gehlen was secretly brought to the US and then made intelligence chief of West Germany in Bonn, Nazi Spy Chief, recruited in secret by US post WW2. The person who wrote the warren commission report uh rudolph augustus whitaker came from the army historical division where he had worked since the 50s he had been an official historian of the reich for adolf hitler and was brought into this country and the army historical division was apparently the early drop point for the Gehlen network and i wondered if you had a sense in your work of the role that these Nazis played when they came in and how central they were to the cold war history the reason i’ve alluded to the work of the OSS in Bucharest and hung in Romania under frank Wisner one of their leading agents is because that as the soviet army was coming to the border of Romania there was an interval of about 10 days the germans were fleeing and the Russians were coming in a peace treaty was signed with romania by united states and to Great Britain and in that little interlude they rounded up 750 American POWs mostly air crewmen have been bombing the plowest airfields and i received a call from general giles in cairo to set up about 35-40 aircraft to go to a little remote field in syria where a freight train would come by and we went there early in the morning and these 750 American POWs jumped off the train came running toward our planes to be flown to cairo and intermingled with these men we didn’t know it we started talking to someone on the airplane were Nazis who were being taken out of romania and the Balkans by the oss for pretty obvious reasons they knew all the intelligence in the Balkans they knew the intelligence in the ukraine and other adjoining areas of russia and they wanted to preserve them they didn’t want the communists you know they want even though russia was our ally i mean this was beginning the cold war i had been ordered to fly into russia only about two weeks before this other flight and and i lived up in russia for a little while getting uh doing a certain mission up there which was army mission you know we had no knowledge at the time we went up there to syria to pick up the American prisoners that among this group of 750 americans some British that they were going to be the these nazi intelligence specialists of course they weren’t identified to us but we realized they weren’t americans it’s only later when we talked to the general in cairo that we found out who they were and they were a top professional nazi team that knew all the agent networks in the in the southern part of the soviet union southwestern part and the balkans so in from that point of view they were invaluable but this was an effort run against the soviet union are alive at that period and i believe that probably this is the first step on record of a cold war move of major importance now you talked about general galen the agreements made with galen were made actually before the war ended he had made a deal with certain american intelligence people general seibert for one that he would lay low bury his files and surrender as soon as possible rather than draw attention to himself on the nazi side and galen of course was hitler’s prime intelligence general a terrific prisoner for us to gain but the object of this was basic to setting up the cold war material you see because galen’s intelligent information accounted for the rest of the western part of the soviet union and all of eastern europe and the discussions with galen were led that led to galen were led by alan dulles who was in switzerland as the oss senior officer in that area and it’s a very interesting thing because alan dulles and his brother john foster dulles were with this large law firm in new york sullivan cromwell sullivan cromwell had offices throughout germany all through the 30s and the Dulles brothers were very close to the tyson steelworks and ig farben company in fact interestingly enough the agency’s headquarters in germany after the war was in frankfurt germany in the ig Farben building you know it just happened that way well the dulles contacts that people thought would be oss intelligence work were actually the people he knew anyway as a result of his legal work in germany the nazis were while hitler was running germany and if you’ll recall the history like many other american companies even though world war ii started as far as england and france were concerned and holland and belgium and all in poland had been attacked american companies did not close their offices union bank from new york didn’t close its offices in germany nor did the sullivan cromwell until pearl harbor and then they more or less had to but then through intelligence they retain contacts

The Zionist dominance of German-owned radio company Global: DDN interview LBC presenter Sangita Myskal, who lost job after criticising Israel. THE ISRAEL INTERVIEW MEDIA WANT TO BAN: Sangita Myska Doesn’t Hold Back 48 hours after interviewing an Israeli government spokesperson on live radio, Sangita Myska was taken off air and removed from her show. Now, breaking her silence on Double Down Newswatch former LBC broadcaster Sangita Myska exposes the legal gag orders, perpetual NDAs, social media monitoring, and institutional cowardice silencing journalists across British mainstream media.

How intelligence services captured academia. ‘The Mighty Wurlitzer: how the CIA played America’ book by Hugh Wilford (2009)- term coined by CIA Frank Wisner The Mighty Wurlitzer: How the CIA Played America Hugh Wilford, . . Harvard Univ. Well before the beginning of the Cold War, the Soviet Union achieved a series of propaganda successes by using “front” organizations that ostensibly served independent purposes but were orchestrated by Moscow. In the late 1940s, Frank Wisner, chief of political warfare for the newly created CIA, proposed a U.S. version: a “mighty Wurlitzer” that like its namesake would play the music America desired. California State–Long Beach professor Wilford describes the “Wurlitzer” as most successful in supporting Western Europe’s noncommunist leftist unions, students and intellectuals during the 1950s. As the Cold War spread, the CIA organized programs in the Third World combining development with anticommunism. The CIA was more a source of funding and fine-tuning than the master player its organizers intended; few of its front groups were unaware of the connection. What made the system work was a shared, principled and intense anticommunism combined with trust in America’s intentions and capabilities. As these eroded during the Vietnam era, the Wurlitzer’s music grew discordant, then ceased altogether. Wilford’s conclusion that winning hearts and minds is best left to overt processes and organizations is predictable and defensible. Still, Wisner’s Wurlitzer helped level the playing field at a crucial period of the Cold War. In 1967 the magazine Ramparts ran an exposé revealing that the Central Intelligence Agency had been secretly funding and managing a wide range of citizen front groups intended to counter communist influence around the world. In addition to embarrassing prominent individuals caught up, wittingly or unwittingly, in the secret superpower struggle for hearts and minds, the revelations of 1967 were one of the worst operational disasters in the history of American intelligence and presaged a series of public scandals from which the CIA’s reputation has arguably never recovered. CIA official Frank Wisner called the operation his “mighty Wurlitzer,” on which he could play any propaganda tune. In this illuminating book, Hugh Wilford provides the first comprehensive account of the clandestine relationship between the CIA and its front organizations. Using an unprecedented wealth of sources, he traces the rise and fall of America’s Cold War front network from its origins in the 1940s to its Third World expansion during the 1950s and ultimate collapse in the 1960s. Covering the intelligence officers who masterminded the CIA’s fronts as well as the involved citizen groups–émigrés, labor, intellectuals, artists, students, women, Catholics, African Americans, and journalists–Wilford provides a surprising analysis of Cold War society that contains valuable lessons for our own age of global conflict.

Peter Fleming book – Dark Academia, how universities die. Peter Fleming’s Dark Academia: How Universities Die (2024) Peter Fleming’s new book records the acute pathologies afflicting universities as workplaces and laboratories of knowledge and learning. Peter Fleming, Will Davies, Gargi Bhattacharyya and Albena Azmanova discuss the book at a launch event to mark its publication by Pluto Press.

Afshin Rattansi, Going Underground – interviews Ken Silva, author of ‘The Trump Assassination Plots’.  The Trump Assassination Plots: What You Haven’t Been Told (Ken Silva) Afshin Rattansi’s GU On this episode of Going Underground, we speak to Ken Silva, Author of ‘The Trump Assassination Plots’ to discuss everything from the Ukrainian and Israeli connection to the assassination attempts, Israel’s alleged role in cooking up fake assassination plots to make Trump more hawkish on Iran, unexplained coincidences, and whether a cover-up is taking place.

‘The Maidan Massacre in Ukraine: the mass killing that changed the World’ book by Ivan Katchanovski. [DOWNLOAD THE BOOK 10MB https://drive.google.com/file/d/16x0bh-PMB8FTbffx7prqDVmv4bKTokSM The Maidan Massacre in Ukraine The Mass Killing that Changed the World Ivan Katchanovski © 2024 “A courageous and important study of one of the most momentous events in recent history. Based on a painstaking analysis of the available evidence, Katchanovski demonstrates how the false flag shootings of 18-20 February 2014 unfolded and their impact on subsequent developments in Ukraine. If a single book can change our understanding of a historical event, this is it.” (Richard Sakwa, Emeritus Professor of Russian and European Politics, University of Kent, UK) Shows how the Maidan massacre ultimately contributed to the start of the war in Donbas Provides detailed analysis of government investigations into the massacre and its perpetrators Explores the role of oligarchs and the far right in Ukrainian politics The book draws on publicly available videos, photos and audio recordings of the massacre in English, Ukrainian, Russian, Polish and other languages, along with several hundred individual testimonies and revelations from the Ukrainian investigation and a trial and its verdict. By examining which parties were responsible for the massacre, the book analyses its implications for not only Russia’s war on Ukraine but also political developments across the globe. Conflicting Narratives of the Maidan Massacre in Ukraine Video Reconstruction and Content Analysis of the Maidan Massacre on February 20, 2014 Testimonies of Several Hundred Witnesses and 14 Self-Admitted Maidan Snipers Trial and Investigation Testimonies of Wounded Maidan Activists and Witnesses Forensic Ballistic and Medical Examinations by Ukrainian Government Experts The Maidan Massacre on February 18–19, 2014, and Related Cases of Violence During the EuroMaidan in Ukraine The Maidan Massacre Trial Verdict, and Cover-up, Stonewalling, and Evidence Tampering Conclusion and Implications for the Russia-Ukraine War and Other Conflicts in Ukraine “Katchanovski’s study is a model of contemporary social science research based on social media, testimonies of participants, and evidence and verdicts of subsequent legal trials. Analysis derived from the data is unparalleled in the study of extra-legal politics in post-Soviet Ukraine. This is a convincing book which should be read by everyone interested in knowing the truth about current developments in Ukraine and especially the underlying causes of the Ukrainian-Russian conflict.” (David Lane, Emeritus Professor of Sociology, Cambridge University)

William Clarkson interviews Tony about Nick Land. Patricia Opulenza poem. We struck up a friendship playing SPI war games etc at ‘Diplomacy Club’ every Saturday at Nicks home in Warren Road on the edge of Hayes Common. The large interlinked woodland wilderness was the perfect place for Nick’s occasional ‘paramilitary exercises’ with other school friends. Nick and I sat next to each other at Langley Park School for Boys (LPSB) racing through Maths and Physics exercises, both joining the school’s Air Training Corps 578 squadron under Brian Hockings and later developing a shared interest in the curious phenomenon of hallucinogenic drugs. Nick had an obsession with the US carnage and had developed a ‘dark sense of humour’ around Vietnam. In contrast, he borrowed one of my hardback copies of Catholic writer and modern Bible translator JRR Tolkien’s Lord of The Rings. ‘Accelerationism is a range of revolutionary and reactionary ideas in left-wing and right-wing ideologies that call for the drastic intensification of capitalist growth, technological change, infrastructure sabotage [citation needed] and other processes of social change to destabilize existing systems and create radical social transformations, otherwise referred to as “acceleration”. It has been regarded as an ideological spectrum divided into mutually contradictory left-wing and right-wing variants, both of which support the indefinite intensification of capitalism and its structures as well as the conditions for a technological singularity, a hypothetical point in time at which technological growth becomes uncontrollable and irreversible.’ Nick Land on Satanism. Who Is Nick Land? Originally an anarchic academic at the University of Warwick, and later the leader of an avant-garde-theory cult organized around cyberpunk, cybernetics, mumbo jumbo and drugs, Land today is a living meme and an oracle, generating a singular mixture of caustic political commentary and oblique numerological ravings on his seminal X account from Shanghai. Known as the “father of accelerationism” after his doctrine of hyperintelligent capitalism superseding humanity (a fate which he welcomes), in recent years Land has been linked with white nationalist terrorism by U.S. activist journalists, saluted by investor Marc Andreessen in his widely circulated Techno-Optimist Manifesto, and had his writing cross-examined for ‘crimethink’ by a corrupt British barrister at the High Court in London. NICK LAND: You know, it’s really not just about whose side are you on, you know. I mean, if you say whose side are you on? Well, okay. You know, if it’s Manakian, I’ll be on God’s side rather than the devil’s side. You know, if I’m going to be punk, I’ll be on the devil’s side rather than God’s side.

Nazis developed both nuclear weapons | & MK ULTRA brainwashed assassins for USA | Israel behind the 7/7 London Bombings: Tony Gosling’s documentary, and article | Videos of full shows | Economic essentials: Michael Hudson | Blackrock/Vanguard | Why/how Israel Assassinated JFK & RFK | Operation Gladio | Tony on Brexit & (4th Reich) Traitors of Arnhem | Creation vs. Evolution | God vs. Lucifer | ‘Great Plan’ for 3 World Wars | Devil Worship: The Rise Of Satanism | Nuclear Armed IDF Doomsday Cult | Aanirfan | Armageddonists I have known: Nick Land (1976-8) | George Monbiot (1995-7) | Manna for the Revelation Generation: CONSPIRACY CLASSICS, longer interviews/lectures

Radio4All download pages
COMPLETE SHOW AND FULL INTERVIEWS [right click to download]
#1 – Complete 4hr show – [right click to download]
Full interviews with…
#2 – The Nerd Reich, Silicon Valley fascism and the war on democracy by Gil Duran – 00:35:00
#3 – EXCLUSIVE Nazi Nick Land a teenager at Langley Park, LSD, Satanism, Speed, Sussex Warwick universities, now in Shanghai Tony Gosling William Clarkson – 01:00:00
#4 – EXCLUSIVE Miodrag Zarkovic filmmaker on life of Bosnian Serb general Ratco Mladic saved Bosnian Serbs from armed Muslim Croats John Bosnitch – 00:35:00
#5 – EXCLUSIVE Neil Turner BPPAHome Office Leaflet falsely prohibits public photos and filming – 00:20:00
#6 – Col Fletcher Prouty on Nazis incoming to USA after WWII and JFK assassination – 01:20:00
#7 – Peter Hitchens This House Would Rather go to War with Russia than Lose Ukraine Oxford Union July 2026 – 00:15:00

The Bristol Politics Show CANCELLED and attempts to intimidate us

July 2024 – Tony, Dave and Martin’s NOT The BCfm Politics show was CANCELLED/EVICTED from their PRSC studio in a no fault, no notice, no appeal, eviction by Chloe Slater of The People’s Republic of Stokes Croft (PRSC) arts centre – An email from Chloe and Keith Cowling explained that: ‘Transphobic’ leaflets, which we were not shown, had been left in the building by a recent guest (who denied it) making Transsexual users of the building feel ‘offended’ and ‘unsafe’. To quote: ‘Please let us know when you or Dave would like to come and retrieve your equipment and drop off your keys. Kind regards’ PRSC Directors (Keith Cowling, chair) PRSC / Stokes Croft China 17-35 Jamaica St Bristol BS2 8JP. Chloe Slater (formerly young man Jez and now self-defined as ‘she’) also made it difficult for us to retrieve the last of our equipment by inferring we couldn’t be trusted, we were made to wait in the cold outside their building for over 30 minutes to return their mixing desk and retrieve our remaining kit in December 2024. 

[UPDATE channel restored by YT in July 2025] October 2022 – Tony’s Public Enquiry Channel opened in March 2008, with 13 million views, over 1,600 videos and 26,000 subscribers is removed under false pretences by YouTube – A video Tony recorded in New Zealand ‘Bill Gates, ID2020 & Revelation: Quaker Tony Gosling on Covid 19 & the Bible’ and uploaded on 8th April 2020 got a ‘third strike’ but YouTube’s ‘medical misinformation’ regime was introduced in September 2021 so should not have included as ‘strikes’ videos uploaded before that date.  Documentary makers are just about the only public interest investigators left in the NATO zone. From the top down, our mainstream media, police, political parties & intelligence services are being compromised by feudal banksters, secret societies and the mafia. Key people intimidated by psychopathic black magic types and their pliable drones who will even kill to take over positions of power? Just search for “John Scarlett” and “Dodgy Dossier” and you’ll see what I mean. The Zionists are every bit as fundamentalist and twisted as the leaders and followers of ISIS. Register here and join us in the discussion as we wriggle free of the psychopaths, back to sanity http://www.911forum.org.uk

March 2020 – BCfm’s weekly Politics Show presented by Tony Gosling with Irish Republican Labour activist Martin Summers was forced off FM, now online only by station manager Pat Hart. He decided the show should be ‘rested, due to the pandemic’ on 24 March 2020 and then refused to communicate at all when we requested to do the show remotely. Bristol Community FM (BCfm) charity ‘CEO’ Patrick Hart is a long-time personal friend of Bristol’s all-powerful right-wing ‘Labour’ mayor Marvin Rees. Pat Hart has a private property portfolio on the continent and also does Public Relations work for property speculators who are taking over community facilities such as Redfield Cinema. Now on Internet only NOT The BCfm Politics Show is available 17:00-c. 20:00 live on Fridays. Pat Hart replaced us with a dumbed-down student show repeating MSM stories called The Bristol Agenda. If you’d like to share your views on his deliberate dumbing-down and pro-Covid jab mismanagement you can contact UK broadcasting regulator Ofcom or BCfm board chair and the ‘Don’ himself, here.

February 2019 – Ofcom complaint result: UKLFI exposed as creation of Israeli foreign ministry – Bristol Post article: BCfm cleared after being reported to Ofcom for anti-semitic conspiracy theories – It could have resulted in BCfm radio station being shut down if the complaint was upheld Tony Gosling reported to Ofcom by UK Lawyers for Israel after being accused of anti-semitism A Bristol radio station, which had one of its programmes reported for anti-semitism and racism has been cleared by Ofcom. The radio regulatory body received a complaint from “UK Lawyers for Israel’ over a show on BCfm radio, hosted by investigative journalist Tony Gosling. The weekly politics show, on the popular community radio station based in Easton, was reported for several allegations on a show which aired on November 23. Tony Gosling, who was a former BBC journalist between 1989 and 1993, has been producing and presenting ‘The Tony Gosling Politics’ show every week on BCFM radio for 11 years. They have released a statement which reads: “Whilst we are supportive of all our volunteer presenters, The Tony Gosling Politics Show only represents approximately ten percent of our political output content wise, and less than two per cent of our entire weekly output.” Mr Gosling’s programme looks at local politics and he interviews a range of councillors and MPs in the city. The show is also perhaps more well known for its alternative look at international politics, and he has a cult following online from across the world. Mr Gosling has made regular appearances on national media including the politics show with Andrew Neil on BBC One, and international channels such as Russia Today, Channel1 Russia, NTV, and recently for both Turkish and Lebanon TV.

November 2012 – Tony gets death threats on the phone from the Jewish Defence League – ‘you’re a dead man walking’ – a man calls him and Tony records the call. Audio of UK Jewish Defence League (JDL) death threat against British journalist Tony Gosling (2012) – Avon and Somerset police Special Branch investigate, trace the caller, and after six months report to Tony that the individual has been served a caution that they will proceed with a prosecution for harassment under the 1861 offences against the person act. Seems pretty clear this death threat was issued alongside the lies, copied below, which were published on their blog by London based UK JDL in November 2012.  Firstly Tony Gosling is not a ‘homophobe’. That accusation was first made in an article published by the ‘Harry’s Place’ blog, penned by Zionist David Toube and propelled by him anonymously into Private Eye in 2008. It refers to Gosling’s criticism of senior teachers at Bannerman Road Primary school in Bristol who used homosexual early learning picture books against the express wishes of the parent governors. His criticism was about the deception by teaching staff not because of the homosexual content of the books. Secondly, if you follow the JDL link you’ll find what Tony Gosling actually says about the ‘Protocols Of The Learned Elders Of Zion’ says “…I don’t think there is much doubt that the Protocols are fake…” Thirdly he is not a member of Bristol Palestine Solidarity Campaign and has never been to any of their meetings.

Autumn 2014 – Tony’s documentary production and distribution business shut down by its bank. Our thriving Co-op business bank account ordered closed for undisclosed reasons. Tony Gosling and Ben Edwards founded i-Contact Video Network to distribute documentaries on VHS video and DVD and to make their own documentaries as well as attend news events and sell video footage to TV news channels. Amongst the films we distributed were Operation Solstice, Coconut Revolution, Mark Purdey and Organophosphates, McLibel, 9/11 In Plane Site, Ludicrous Diversion and The Battle of Trafalgar. These, plus books, and even a board game about drug dealing ‘Dollars and Dibble’, were all available via mail order and we supplied libraries around the world too. The bank had clearly been ordered to investigate us for money laundering, although they never admitted it. All the questions they asked Ben and I were about proving our identity through passports etc.. When we did, yet more letters kept arriving demanding more proofs, birth certificates etc. and eventually when one of us missed supplying the required information, within a week or so of being asked, the account was summarily closed and we got a cheque made out to one of us with the few hundred pounds that was in the business bank account. Since neither of us could get a business bank account up and running for at least a few months and the bank account meant nobody could any longer use the website, we made the reluctant decision to shut it down. Thus was a thriving business killed off by the Co_operative bank. Having said that, co-op were not quite the worst. We did apply to open an account at Bristol’s ‘ethical’ Triodos bank, who proceeded to string us along for several months and then said our business was too risky for them to provide an account!