Radio4All mp3 audio files usually available from 23:00 2-4hrs, after TX – we’ll credit you if you rebroadcast. Any probs. mp3s should be on alternative links below by then
Part One – Local and National News Review
Paul: Government relations, corporate communications, public policy and strategy professional. Experience: data innovation, financial services, health insurance, infrastructure and pharmaceuticals in London, Dublin and Brussels. – Donald Mack Six foot one and a big Black bundle of comedy fun. Donald Mack is one of the new generation of Black stand-up comedians. Old enough to know better, but young enough to not give a shit! Donald Mack is a unique comedian. He balances his material between his”Old Skool” roots and his”Nu Skool” attitudes. This means that anything (well almost) and anybody is up for ridicule including the Mack Daddy himself. Donald may be cuddly and lovable, but he’s also hard-hitting, uses explicit language (sometimes) and explicit material (all of the time) and a bloody good laugh to boot. With Donald, be it social, political, sexual or surreal it’s going to be damn funny. His unique take on life and our perceptions is fuelled by his dual belief that”Shit happens” and”So what! “
Hours after this investigation was published, the Indian government said it had summoned representatives of Instagram’s parent company, Meta, over the adverts. Ads on Instagram are only published after first being approved by its moderation technology. When the BBC reported one of the ads to Instagram, the social media platform responded 24 hours later saying the post did not violate its “community guidelines”. Later, when the BBC asked Meta for comment, it said it had already disabled several adverts and suspended the accounts posting them. The company said it had removed additional ads, disabled more accounts and blocked URLs for other content that violated its policies in response to the BBC’s findings. Telegram said it had removed more than 274,000 groups and channels related to child sexual abuse material in 2026. The BBC set up an alias account on Instagram after we noticed that the platform was pushing sexually suggestive content, even when a user hadn’t searched for such material. This included women posting about food, weather and daily life in India, who were dressed in revealing clothing and using sexual innuendo in their posts. The new alias account, which was set up in India, started following these women and other similar people – 10 in all – to investigate sexualised content on the platform. In less than a week, Instagram started showing advertisements on the feed featuring women offering video calls and showing clearly naked couples having sex. Days later, it began showing adverts of children with adults in sexually suggestive situations, with links to Telegram channels. A retired justice of India’s Supreme Court, Madan Lokur, said he was concerned that Instagram was “making money by participating in a criminal activity” In total, about 30 unique adverts appeared promoting child sexual abuse, although some of these were shared by multiple accounts. The alias account was also shown about 20 ads featuring adult pornography. The distribution of both child sexual abuse material and adult pornography are criminal offences in India, while Meta’s policy states that ads must not contain adult nudity, genitals or content that sexually exploits or endangers children. The BBC has reported all of the ads and the Telegram channels to the Indian authorities. One ad showed a boy and girl, both of whom appeared to be about 12 years old, engaging in a sexual act. Another showed a man with his arm around a girl, with text saying he was 52 and the girl was 12. “Click to watch more,” it said, linking out to a Telegram channel. The BBC reported an advert to Instagram showing a very young girl in tears, with wording indicating that she had been sexually assaulted. But 24 hours later, Instagram replied saying it hadn’t removed the advert because “our review team found that the advertiser’s ad does not go against our community standards”.
As the Canary has already reported, Purnell was the chairperson of the lobby group, Labour Friends of Israel (LFI). He was also, until recently, the chief executive of lobby group Flint Global, which counts BP, Amazon, Jaguar Land Rover and Uber among its clients. Flint has also previously advised Thames Water. As Ranjan Balakumaran said: This appointment exposes the absolute hypocrisy behind Burnham’s carefully managed rhetoric on devolution and public control. Before he even steps foot inside Number Ten, we must demand a full, unvarnished list of all James Purnell’s corporate conflicts of interest—because right now, devolution and reindustrialization is the bait, and corporate capture is the switch. The most bizarre thing Purnell ever got caught up in while in politics was a scandal involving a doctored press photo. In 2007, it emerged that Purnell was pasted into a photocall at a local hospital after arriving late. The hospital said they did so with his consent. The MP originally corroborated this story. However, when it became clear it was a fake he denied it. On air with Look North West he was confronted with the hospital’s statement that he consented. He brushed it off as a misunderstanding. Architect of cruel DWP cuts Purnell was also Secretary of State for the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) under Gordon Brown. During his two years there, he was the architect of Labour’s discriminatory ‘contributory principle’ on benefits, which massively screwed over those who couldn’t work or ‘contribute’. Purnell voted repeatedly for tougher rules around benefits. He championed the welfare reform bill of 2009, which made benefits harder to claim and tied welfare to work. He also voted for and was involved with the introduction of Employment Support Allowance to replace Incapacity Benefit. This led to the introduction of the cruel Work Capability Assessment. As a result, there were stricter criteria for those too sick to work. In 2011, Purnell told Newsnight that he wanted to cut ‘little freebies’ such as the Winter Fuel Allowance and free bus passes for pensioners. He argued they should be means-tested. He also said these should be included only in the state pension. Cruelly, he also attempted to put interest rates of up to 26.8% per annum on crisis loans, which, of course, had always been interest-free. This eventually had to be blocked by Brown. He also supported conditionality and sanctions, which placed restrictions on benefit claimants and punished them for ridiculous reasons…
VIDEO
Starmer [terrible VIDEO performance in Commons] giving an apology about Mandelson and how the foreign office went against secret service advice. Lee Anderson MP doesn’t believe he didn’t know. Status quo politics childish and process based. Journalism has been dumbed down. What finally brought Starmer down: Two MPs ejected from Commons for accusing Keir Starmer of ‘lying’ over Mandelson Lee Anderson and Zarah Sultana were both ordered to leave the chamber by Commons Speaker Sir Lindsay Hoyle. Reform UK MP Lee Anderson and Your Party’s Zarah Sultana have both been removed from the House of Commons for accusing Sir Keir Starmer of lying during a statement from the Prime Minister on the appointment of Lord Peter Mandelson as US ambassador.Mr Anderson (Ashfield) was told to leave by the Commons Speaker, and did so after he said Sir Keir had been “lying” throughout the scandal. Later Ms Sultana refused Sir Lindsay’s initial offer to depart after calling Sir Keir a “bare-faced liar”. She faced the procedure of being “named” by the Commons Speaker. This can lead to a suspension. The House of Commons’ rules prevent MPs from accusing one another of telling lies, or deliberately misleading one another. Mr Anderson, the MP for Ashfield, told the Commons that Sir Keir had “been lying” during the Lord Mandelson saga. He told the Commons: “The problem the Prime Minister’s got is no one believes him. The public don’t believe him. The MPs on this side of the House don’t believe him. His own gullible backbenchers don’t believe him. “So does the Prime Minister agree with me, he’s been lying?” Sir Lindsay intervened to ask Mr Anderson to withdraw his comments. He said: “Sorry, we don’t use those words, and I’m sure the member’s withdrawn it.” Mr Anderson replied: “Mr Speaker, I have the greatest respect for you and your office, but I will not withdraw it. That man couldn’t lie straight in bed.” Sir Lindsay said: “Mr Anderson, you’ll have to leave.” Meanwhile Ms Sultana, a former Labour Party MP who resigned from Labour and co-founded Your Party in July last year, went further as she accused him of “gaslighting the nation”. She said: “We all know that the Prime Minister appointed Mandelson because he owes his job to him. He appointed him, he defended him, and now he claims to know nothing. “He is gaslighting the nation. So let’s call this out for what it is. The Prime Minister is a bare-faced liar.” Sir Lindsay said: “Leave now, I’ll name you otherwise, I’d go now if I were you. “I’ve given the option to name. I’d leave if I were you, very quickly.” Ms Sultana attempted to interject and said: “I have a duty to the House to tell the truth.” Sir Lindsay then held a vote, brought by Government whip Gen Kitchen which said: “I beg to move that Zarah Sultana be suspended from the services of the House.”
VIDEO
BBC Question Time presenter Fiona Bruce clashed with Zia Yusuf after he suggested the show’s audience was not balanced. Reform UK’s home affairs spokesman complained after only eight people put their hands up when he asked who supported the party. But Bruce hit back by insisting the BBC was “scrupulous” in ensuring the make-up of the audience represented wider public opinion. After one audience member said Nigel Farage should never be prime minister, Yusuf said to Bruce: “You did ask earlier who supports Reform, and I make out four people in the audience put their hands up, which is interesting given Reform is at 28% in the polls. “It’s a genuine question, can we get a show of hands from people who actually support Reform?” When several people put their hands up, Bruce told him: “I think you’ll see that’s a bit more than four.” Yusuf said: “I make that eight. It’s certainly nowhere close to representative I’m afraid, Fiona.” But Bruce told him: “Can I just point out there are more people than that in the audience, they’re just not putting their hands up.” Yusuf said: “We’ll all have to take the BBC’s word for that.” In response, Bruce said the corporation was “scrupulous” in ensuring the Question Time audience is balanced. “I’m certainly not lying about it, I can tell you that,” she said. When Yusuf then asked “where’s the evidence”, the presenter replied: “As you know, we interview everybody over the phone, we check their social media. “But what also happens is not everyone wants to put their hand up and show their political allegiance on national television, and there is nothing I can do about that, I’m afraid.”
VIDEO
Ed Miliband needs to make net zero truly affordable or we’re all cooked argues Alex Evans. Another sweltering day, another hot weather record broken. As anyone who lived through it will tell you, 1976 was an unforgettable summer heatwave – given it was so unusual. But just five decades on, in the 2020s, those record temperatures arrive every summer, every year, several times per year. On Wednesday, the Met Office said it was the hottest June day ever recorded in the UK as overnight temperatures stayed above 23C. Then on Thursday the record was broken again. And it was a hat trick on Friday – as a temperature of 37.3C was recorded in Santon Downham, Suffolk. This extreme heat is here to stay and it’s only going to get worse before it gets better, thanks to the rapid pace of global warming. But politicians like Ed Miliband need to realise that his net zero plans to tackle this crisis are simply out of reach for all but the most wealthy – and that should worry everyone. Solar panels, EVs and heat pumps are all good ideas. If we could wave a magic wand and switch every home in the UK to solar panels and heat pumps with an EV in the driveway, it would massively reduce the country’s carbon emissions and equip everyone with the tools to fight the causes of climate change and protect us from the effects in the meantime. EVs can recharge at home for a couple of quid from increasingly renewable electricity sources, or for free from your solar, not running from £100 tanks of fossilised dinosaur liquid which converts into carbon pollution on the go. Solar panels literally get free energy from the sun to power everything in your house and pay for themselves within a few years. The problem is most UK households can’t afford to go green. Somehow, we’ve ended up in a situation where saving the planet just isn’t cost effective – and in true ‘two tier’ style it’s the poorest who will suffer the most. The average cost to buy even a second-hand EV is between £10,000 and £20,000, according to car dealership Dick Lovett. That doesn’t sound horrific, but that’s still far beyond what many drivers can afford, especially the very old, the very young, and the very put-upon low income families. These drivers are buying an old petrol Peugeot for £2,000 to £5,000 and when it breaks, they’ll do the same again.
VIDEO
Privatisation Vs nationalisation. Markets, regulation. Fares Fair – Free Public Transport for London Labour leader, Ken Livingstone, and his transport chair Dave Wetzel’s ‘Fares Fair’ initiative helped them win the 1981 GLC election . They got straight to it, cutting all bus and underground fares by a third, using a small increase in the ‘rates’ tax of every householder in London to pay for it. Public transport in London had received its biggest ever political boost.The GLC were taking the first steps in their plan for free public transport for Londoners. Side by side with their ‘Just the Ticket’ initiative the GLC also introduced the now indispensable travelcard, giving London’s travelling public daily or weekly unlimited intermodal travel for the first time ever. The ‘Travelcard’ gave holders access to buses and the underground system. British Rail trains were added with the ‘Capitalcard’. The move was based on the reasoning that cars were receiving disproportionate subsidy from central government compared to the congestion they cause. Public transport was overpriced but under-resourced, so it needed local government support to help it compete with private cars. Practically this meant London Transport and the GLC had to put bums on empty seats. A long-term plan People’s travelling habits take a long time to change. If bus fares go down we’re not going to give up the car overnight, if at all, but even during Fares Fair’s first year it was a roaring success. Millions of Londoners chose to leave their cars at home and, since London is the hub of the national public transport network, the idea looked set to spread across the nation. Details of the scheme were masterminded by Sir Peter Maesfield, Chair of London Transport Executive, who proudly watched passengers flocking to the tubes and the buses in their droves. His off-peak fare scheme meant that the overall passenger load was spread, poorer passengers travelling when buses and trains would have plenty of spare capacity. Fares Fair threatened the interests of very powerful people Behind the scenes though all was not well. The roads lobby: oil companies, haulage industry, car and lorry manufacturers, motoring organisations, tire companies etc. shuddered at the increasingly realistic possibility of free public transport for London. Their interests were under serious threat. So the travelling public’s enthusiasm for the scheme was matched only by the panic in the ivory towers of industry. Followed automatically by the wrath of right-wing politicians and the tabloid press. Suddenly every other headline warned the public to beware the profligate evils of ‘Red Ken’ Livingstone. The Tories rallying cry: ‘get Red Ken!’ There were a few exceptions, Croydon’s Tory leader, Peter Bowness, supported Fares Fair, but the overwhelming majority of Tories fought to out-do each other in support of their corporate backers. Michael Hesletine at the Department of the Environment immediately clawed back £119million of the GLC’s transport grant and Norman Fowler at the Department of Transport creamed £20million off the GLC’s train subsidy. On top of this the previous Tory GLC administration under Horace Cutler had left Livingstone with a £26million deficit which he was determined to clear. These acts of political spoiling made the scheme less financially viable than it should have been. Yet still it looked like it could continue to work and the GLC pressed ahead. But the Tories has one final trick up their sleeve. Peter Bowness’s neighbour, Dennis Barkway, and Bromley Council’s Tories, thought they might stop the GLC in the courts. Because Fowler had temporarily scuppered GLC plans to include British Rail in Fares Fair, ratepayers in areas with BR rather than underground services, like Bromley, would only be able to take advantage of the resulting reduction of bus fares, not underground. Fare’s Fair is unfair on Bromley, Barkway might have protested. Over lunch in the ‘Bird in Hand’ pub Gravel Road, one Sunday in July 1981 Barkway and the Bromley wreckers first resolved to stop Fares Fair. Barkway received the nod from Council solicitor Richard Pugh and a special committee was set up to mastermind the legal challenge, with cllrs. Fred David, Philip Jones and Simon Randall joining Barkway. ‘Vandals In Ermine’ (Dave Wetzel) The case began at the divisional court on October 28th 1981. Acknowledging that the proposal had been a central plank in Labour’s election victory Mr. Justice McNeill gave judgment saying “these things must be decided in the hustings”. He stressed the importance of separating Politics from the Judiciary and asserted that the law must never be used for political ends. Lord Justice Dunn and Mr. Justice Phillips dismissed the case on November 3rd with costs paid by the council. At this stage the council had could already be accused of wasting ratepayers money on anti-social court action. How then did they feel confident enough to take the case to appeal, knowing that costs here could top £200,000. The appeal was heard swiftly. On November 10th Lord Justice Oliver and Lord Justice Watkins ruled the fares cut and the supplementary rate unlawful. The final judgment would have to be the house of lords.
VIDEO
Andy Burnham’s first speech as PM-in-waiting – from No10 North to tax vow 1. No10 North – Andy Burnham announced a No10 North will be based in Manchester to “redistribute power and resources across the UK”. 2. Council housing – The ex-Greater Manchester Mayor promised the biggest council housing programme since the post-war period. 3. Public control of utilities – The ex-Manchester mayor said his government would set out ten-year plans to bring down the cost of essentials. 4. Cut welfare bill – Mr Burnham said he will “reduce the welfare bill in a way that is fair and lasting” by giving mayors more power over employment support. 5. Business rates – Mr Burnham vowed to revive the country’s struggling high streets – which he said should be “the new symbol of Britain’s renaissance”. 6. Let MPs be authentic – Mr Burnham said he wants MPs to be able to be “authentic representatives” of their constituencies and not fear being told off if they don’t follow the party line. 7. Tax commitment – Mr Burnham has said his plans will be “consistent with the 2024 manifesto” – which vows not to increase National Insurance, the basic, higher, or additional rates of Income Tax, or VATAndy Burnham has promised a ‘new era of possibility’ as he set out his plans for a ten-year mission to raise living standards in his first speech since he effectively became PM in waiting Andy Burnham today promised a “new era of possibility” in his first speech since he effectively became PM-in-waiting. The ex-Greater Manchester mayor – who is expected to take over in No10 as soon as July 20 – vowed to create a No10 North to redistribute power across the country. He said under his leadership he would take “power out of the centre” and put it “in the hands of the people and places who can use it best”. In a speech at People’s History Museum in Manchester, Mr Burnham – wearing his trademark T-shirt – set out a ten-year mission to raise living standards, pledging the biggest council housing programme since the post-war period and greater public control of utilities like water, housing, energy and transport. In a message of hopes to struggling families, he said: “Imagine if we could bring down the cost of energy for people and businesses, and the good things that would come from that. Imagine good growth in every postcode and hope in every heart. I’ll say it again: Imagine good growth in every postcode and hope in every heart. Well, imagine no more. Let’s make it happen.” The Mirror takes a look at some of the key points from his speech.
Prince William: ‘If systems help create homelessness, systems can help prevent it’ The future king is aiming to demonstrate that preventing homelessness is the key to tackling the issue as his Homewards initiative turns three Prince William has vowed to show the power of preventing homelessness as his Homewards initiative marks its third anniversary. The five-year project is aiming to demonstrate that it is possible to end homelessness across the UK. It is situated across six local areas throughout the UK where solutions to solve homelessness are trialled, with the plan of implementing what works at a larger scale. In its first three years, Homewards has supported 70 individuals and families into stable homes, and over 250 people were supported into employment. There are over 100 local initiatives involved in the programme, with a £500,000 fund to develop and deliver hyper-specific local action. Homewards is aiming to fund longer term efforts to prevent homelessness with £1.9 million invested across six locations through the Homewards Fund and £3.5 million through grants and private philanthropy. The number of households living in temporary accommodation is at its highest since records began, with 134,210 households living in temporary housing in England as of the end of 2025. Many people who are in temporary accommodation and social housing face moving into the space with zero to little furniture. Homewards is setting out to tackle the issue with a £2.3 million partnership bringing repurposed furniture to those in social housing. Prince William’s initiative has brought together The Multibank, B&Q, Bosch Home Appliances, DFS Group, Howdens and IKEA to furnish 42 homes so far, with a target of 250 by the end of the programme.
Britain Unbound, a cross-party organisation that promotes Britain’s continued independence from the EU, commissioned the poll. Steve Wright, director of Britain Unbound, said: “This polling result is a damning indictment of the policy of the current UK Government and demonstrates the need for organisations like Britain Unbound to offset the disservice currently being provided by this Government to the British people.” About 27% of those polled said they would be “willing” to give up sovereignty for use of the single market, while 14% of interviewees responded “don’t know”. Respondents were asked: “To what extent would you be willing or unwilling to accept less power for the UK over laws and rules that apply here, in return for the UK to be granted greater access to the EU’s single market?” Across all categories, including education level, sex and region, a majority of those polled said they would not want to lose legislative powers to rejoin the EU single market. The Labour government has pledged to strengthen ties with the EU despite more than 17.4 million people voting to leave 10 years ago…
VIDEO
Since the war began the relationship between Carlson and President Trump has soured. He explained how he went from speaking to the president constantly in the lead-up to the conflict, to not having any communication with him since the first day strikes were launched against Iran. At one point in our conversation, I asked him whether this conflict could become for Donald Trump what Afghanistan became for Joe Biden. The question was a personal one. Having reported extensively on the chaotic withdrawal from Afghanistan, I have long felt it was the turning point of Biden’s presidency – the moment many voters began to question his leadership. So I asked Carlson whether this war could become Trump’s Afghanistan. “Oh yeah, of course it’s the end,” he replied. Not a setback. “The end.” Carlson told me he had personally warned Trump months earlier. “I said to him, you’re the Iran war guy if you do this.” For Carlson, this is not really about Iran. It is about a broken promise. Trump built his political identity on ending America’s foreign wars, not starting new ones. Carlson believes that promise has now been shattered. The most striking moment came when I asked him what this meant for the future of MAGA itself. Carlson leaned back and let out the trademark cackle familiar to millions of his listeners. “That’s over,” he said. “There is no future of the MAGA movement.” I pressed him. “This war caused the end?” “Yeah.”
Part Two – International news review, Accelerationist, Armageddonist reports and investigations
King Charles has broken his coronation oath to defend the Christian faith In a little-noticed change to his official accounts, King Charles appears to have revised his pledge to “defend the faith”. Former Chaplain to the Queen Gavin Ashenden gives his view on what it means When King Charles made public his accounts this week, he surreptitiously slipped into the document a quite significant change. In a few amended lines in the Sovereign Grant Annual Report, the duties of the monarchy have been covertly changed. The King’s title as “Defender of the Faith” has been replaced by “Protector of the Space for Faith within the Multi-faith Nation.” One of the first questions that arises is whether he has the power to change the coronation oath that he swore. Since the monarchy is a creation of parliament, and the oath he swore was part of the settlement in 1688, there is no constitutional evidence that he is in a position to amend it. In fact by doing so, it looks like an attempt to change his oath, which becomes a matter of oath-breaking. It’s up to parliament to decide whether or not they are sufficiently concerned about the way they have constructed the constitutional monarchy we live under, but it has raised a series of anxieties, ranging from questioning King Charles’ integrity, to asking what exactly a multi-faith space looks like. This is, after all, a new job title that the King has given himself. Invading the safe space It’s certainly true that the people of this United Kingdom now comprise a series of different faiths. But what does the idea of a “space for faith” mean? Christians are committed, by their obedience to Jesus, to penetrate the space for faith with the good news about the love of Christ for all humanity, so that Muslims, Hindus, Sikhs, Buddhists and Zoroastrians can be given the opportunity to weigh the claims of Christ. When Jesus told his followers to go out into the world carrying the news of the Kingdom in order to convert people and transform society, this was an injunction to invade the safe space of the multi-faith environments they lived in. Why would the King, as defender of the Christian faith, want to change the priorities that Christ gave to his followers?
The problem is that Islam is equally ambitious to invade the safe space of a multi-faith environment. Muhammed divided the world into two areas. They are the Dar al-Islam (House of Islam), where Islamic law prevails, and the Dar al-Harb (House of War), where it does not. Muhammad invites his followers to pierce the zone of multi-faith with the call to submission and even sanctioned violence. In Surah 9, verse 29, he invited Muslims to fight those who do not believe until they are overcome and pay the jizya tax. Islam and Christianity are both committed, as a matter of obedience to their founders’ vision, to piercing the sanctity of the King’s proposed zone of multi-faith safety. It’s not altogether clear that other religions would be willing to observe a hermetic seal between their own practices and other people’s beliefs. Buddhists are often only too happy to explain the path to enlightenment as the Buddha taught it, also proactively piercing the sanctity of Charles’s multi-faith safe space. So where does the idea of a safe space in a multi-faith environment come from? And why is it so important to King Charles that he’s prepared to abandon his commitment to Christ, the Church of England and the Christian culture of his country? Most people trace it to his regard for the psychologist Karl Gustav Jung and ideas that Charles first encountered from his tutor, Laurens van der Post. Jung considered religion to be a psychological phenomenon, useful in creating a symbolic language that allowed consciousness and unconsciousness to integrate independently of the content of the religious belief. The idea of a multi faith safe space, in Charles mind at least, perhaps originates from him. So we have a king who has deserted Christian allegiance, turned his back on his coronation oath, repudiated the support and promotion of a Christian culture, and wants to impose this Jungian template, designed to achieve the elusive goal of personal integration, or ‘individuation’ on all other religions.
FASCIST EU CENSORSHIP 1: EU crackdown on Russian media. German Courts Make Sharing of Russia Today material a CRIME!! Maria Zakharova: On July 2, the EU Court of Justice handed down a judgment concerning the lawfulness of criminal prosecutions within European Union member states against individuals who make materials from media outlets banned within the EU territory available in the public domain via their internet resources – effectively treating such individuals on a par with telecommunications operators. In practical terms, this judgment applies primarily to those distributing content from RT and other Russian media outlets against whom Brussels has imposed so-called sanctions. Moreover, as indicated in the press release issued by the Court, this approach applies irrespective of whether materials from the “banned” media are retransmitted for the purpose of deriving commercial gain or otherwise. The impetus for this judgment arose from criminal proceedings initiated in Germany against three German nationals, accused of repeatedly reposting video materials from the RT DE channel on their publicly accessible website. ?? Notably, it was not the content of the specific publications that was deemed unlawful, but solely their origin. In order to lend an appearance of legitimacy to this process – a process that utterly fails to conform to the principles of the rule of law – the German authorities sought an opinion of the highest echelons of the European Union’s judicial system, the Court of Justice of the European Union, and ultimately secured its endorsement for the continuation and expansion of the methods of such show-trials. The precedent thus established grants carte blanche to the authorities of any member state within the bloc to carry out mass repression against ordinary residents who hold their own view of world events – a view that diverges from the narrative imposed from above. We characterise this judgment, along with the practices of persecuting dissenters that it legitimises, as a gross violation by the EU and its member states of their international obligations in the sphere of the protection and promotion of fundamental human rights, including the right to unhindered access to information and freedom of expression. This judgment stands as yet another unmistakable example of the European Union’s mockery of justice designed to whitewash the bloc’s degeneration into a space characterised by the most severe political censorship, legal arbitrariness, and hypocrisy. At its core lies the intent to instil a reflexive fear among citizens of the European Union’s member states towards any sources of information “not authorised” by Brussels, to seal off societies within information “bubbles” impervious to inconvenient truths, and to deprive them of the ability to form an independent opinion regarding events and processes of significance to their lives. This latest step taken by the EU towards totalitarian censorship, the exacerbation of antagonism, and the dismantling of the democratic foundations of society must receive a proper assessment from the relevant multilateral institutions. Otherwise, silence on their part would be difficult to interpret as anything other than solidarity with the actions of the European bureaucracy, and acquiescence in the further perpetuation of this pernicious practice.
Don’t publish online against EU values! EU’s New Creator Press Passes Come With a Loyalty Test Brussels is vetting cameras for loyalty and calling it press freedom in the same breath. The Council of the European Union has decided that from July, online creators can attend EU summits and ministerial meetings to make videos for YouTube, TikTok, and Instagram. Fine. But the guidance to member states includes one odd instruction: don’t pick anyone who has “published views against EU values.” What are EU values? Nobody will say. That’s the useful thing about a vague rule. You can point it wherever you like and never have to justify it. Posted something awkward about migration? Wondered whether the euro was a good idea? Suggested the Commission gets things wrong? Possibly against EU values, possibly not, depending on who’s reading your back catalog that morning. There’s no list of banned opinions or a review. An official just looks through your old posts and makes a call. Now imagine them trying this on actual journalists. Guidance that said: nominate reporters to cover the summit, but exclude any who’ve expressed views against EU values. The newspapers would lose their minds, and Brussels knows it, which is exactly why it would never write that sentence down for the press corps. Journalists come with a long tradition of being a nuisance to power, and a fair number of lawyers to back it up. Creators don’t have that armor. There’s no press freedom group ready to defend some bloke with 200,000 followers who makes explainer videos about the Council. So the EU runs an opinion test, files it under “eligibility criteria,” and assumes nobody will notice it’s the same thing it would never ask of a reporter. Which leaves the EU with an awkward question. Is a free press one of these “values” or not? If it is, the rule contradicts itself, because the whole point of a free press is being able to publish views against you. You can’t vet your reporters for loyalty and call it press freedom in the same breath. And if a free press isn’t on the list, then they’ve told you what’s actually on it by what they left off. An institution that believed in free expression wouldn’t reach for an opinion test at all. Sorting the approved from the unapproved. What you get isn’t a press pool so much as a fan club with lanyards. The politicians who said anything were the ones already out of favor. Belgium’s Gerolf Annemans, a Vlaams Belang MEP, went for sarcasm: “I would go even further: nothing should be allowed to be questioned.” Lucas Hartong, formerly a Dutch MEP for the PVV, was drier, noting that “the EU and genuine democracy don’t exactly go hand in hand.” The Sweden Democrats said the whole thing showed “the EU elite is becoming increasingly desperate.”
VIDEO
And I think that the farther this conflict goes, the more it becomes very clear that in fact the interconnections as you as you as you mentioned run very very deep much deeper than we knew. And so, you know, we’ve seen uh 3 days ago Rupert Low publish his inquiry into the into the gang rapes in Great Britain. And that’s a story that has almost died even though it’s been going on for decades because as it turns out practically the whole British governing establishment from uh the police on the street to um social services to uh national health service to councils uh to ministries. the media all the way up to the prime minister’s office and the and the royal high household are all part of the conspiracy. And we can see that clearly now because what the what the report brought to light is probably the the greatest crime ever committed in British history against the people of Britain. And the mainstream media said nothing about it. They’re ignoring it. the royal household they have it it’s been three days now they said nothing about it they are completely silent uh I think that speaks more than anything that they could say by this time because you know if you if you really are there to represent your people to um to to let’s say if you had a pro protective attitude towards your people you would be out there outraged but not not a not a sound and at the same time the same King Charles only weeks ago was addressing the joint chamber of US Congress calling for World War II and his government has committed to sending 150,000 drones to Ukraine without even bothering to hide much that they they will be used for strikes against Russia. Um, of course, I I shouldn’t single out Great Britain even though they’ve been they have been they are they are probably if we’re if we’re going to use the Lord of the Ring uh metaphor, they are the mortar of of the whole uh western western uh colonialist empire. uh but all of these all of all of the the rot has afflicted much of the world but particularly west because okay let’s if we if we just talk about the the gang rapes which may seem like it has nothing to do with the war in Iran and the and the and the and theou and but it’s it’s all interconnected the the same problems of the UK with these gang rapes also register in places like France in Belgium and Germany and Sweden and and Norway and Iceland and Ireland and the the syndrome is practically identical. You have gangs of migrants uh committing rapes
Instead of taking the difficult but more effective course of prevailing on platforms to curb harmful content, the government are introducing a blanket ban which won’t even work. As pointed out by one who should know, Telegram founder Pavel Durov, savvy kids will soon find VPN ways round any ban and thereby enter an even darker uncontrolled internet world. When Telegram was banned in Russia 95% of users got round the ban using VPNs. The father of Molly Russell, who took her own life after viewing harmful content online, accused the government of using a sledgehammer to tackle the problem when what is required is forcing technology companies to abandon dangerous algorithms and predatory design. The consultation the government conducted was a transparent sham with slanted questions designed to give a veneer of public support to its authoritarian plans. Concerns over depriving children of a fundamental freedom and over effectiveness have been brushed aside. Two things are going on here. First the sinking ship of the Labour government is desperately looking for ploys to make itself less unpopular. Secondly it is trying to engineer a back door for tighter government control over citizens’ access to the internet and to slide in Digital ID. Under the proposed legislation adults will have to “prove” their age, whereupon we shall end up with intrusive facial recognition and/or Digital ID. All this rather than make efforts to moderate content better and let families do the job of safeguarding children, not an authoritarian state. A ban lets lax parents off the hook. The Workers Party is the party of personal freedom and the family, we would never trust a government which on the one hand claims to be so concerned about children that it will introduce a draconian social media ban, and which on the other presides over, indeed enthusiastically helped instigate, a state system whereby baby Preston was handed over to two perverts to use as their sexual toy and rape to death. Our children are too important to leave their safety to such State and such a government.
Behind the scenes it is the Queen who is running the show’ As this publication revealed last September, it was Camilla who insisted on the appointment of former newspaper executive Tobyn Andreae as the King’s new spokesman – a move that apparently even blindsided Sir Clive Alderton, the monarch’s long-serving private secretary. As one royal insider explained at the time: “I think there is a sense that behind the scenes, it’s largely the Queen who is running the show.She makes a lot more decisions than people think, especially with [former aide] Michael Fawcett out of the picture.” The departure of Mr Fawcett in November 2021 devastated the King, who was said to be so reliant on his former valet that he once declared: “I can manage without just about anyone, except for Michael.” But his absence from the royal court only appears to have strengthened Camilla’s position. “The King does have weaknesses and it’s fair to say that the Queen knows how to exploit them,” added the insider. “But it’s a bigger court now and the King has duties that can’t be ignored and that need the support of the Queen.”
That’s right, Charles and Camilla’s great-great grandparents also had an illicit relationship. Alice Keppel was the toast of Edwardian society. Alice Frederica Edmonstone, who went by the nickname Freddie (or even, “flirtatious Freddie”) was born into a high-ranking family in 1868: her father was a Baronet and an admiral in the Royal Navy. She grew up in Duntreath Castle in Scotland and married Lieutenant-Colonel George Keppel, a British Royal officer, at 23. She was a renowned beauty with chestnut hair, a pale complexion, large blue eyes, a small waist, and a large chest—all features that were greatly coveted in “the naughties nineties.” Alice was also known for being an exceptionally kind person, even to her enemies. “She was luminous, resplendent… She not only had a gift of happiness, but she excelled in making others happy. She resembled a Christmas tree laden with presents for everyone,” her daughter Violet said. When Alice and George moved to London, they were part of the city’s top social circles and Alice began having affairs in order to move up the social ladder. The money and connections allowed her to thrive as a society hostess, which is how she met Prince Albert Edward in 1898 when he was 56 and she was 29. They stayed together for twelve years, through his coronation as King Edward VII until his death in 1910.
But they have been married to each other longer than they were to their first spouses leaving some to wonder what the secret is to their marriage. Well, that just might be linked to their unusual bedroom arrangement. King Charles and Queen Camilla do not sleep together in the same bed or in the same room for that matter. “[Charles] has a room with a double bed, decorated to his own taste, then Camilla has her own room with a double bed, decorated just the way she likes it,” a friend of the king and queen told the Daily Mail. While that seems like an odd arrangement for some, it’s not uncommon with royal couples. “In England, the upper class always have had separate bedrooms. You don’t want to be bothered with snoring or someone flinging a leg around,” explained Queen Elizabeth II’s cousin Lady Pamela Hicks. As The Mirror noted, another reason for the arrangement may have to do with the king’s health as the monarch has suffered from back pain for years and sleeping alone in a bed makes things easier for him during the night. Moreover, royal expert Joshua Rom suggested that separate bedrooms may also have to do with the fact that the king and queen have such hectic schedules and are around so many people all the time that they prefer to relax separately. Some reports even claim that the arrangement is the “secret” to the pair’s “long-lasting marriage.”
The Canary is now in a financially precarious situation. We do not know when our money that Lloyds is holding will be returned. Moreover, we do not know how it will affect our ability to get another bank account in the future. Lloyds give no explanation We do know that multiple other politically engaged people have suffered similar actions by other banks in recent times. It is not lost on us that powerful banks are able to restrict the financial activity of anti-Zionist and pro-Palestine organisations and individuals. Whilst we do not currently know the reasons behind our debanking, we cannot afford to be naive about this. It is an outrage that the Canary has been unceremoniously dropped into financial instability with no notice or explanation from Lloyds. Independent media targeted Our situation is a damning indictment of the treatment of independent media in this country – whereby you can be potentially ruined without recourse by banking giants like Lloyds. At this moment, we do not have enough cash to pay all our staff – again, because Lloyds is holding so much of our money. Our situation highlights just how at risk independent media is at all times. We need your support constantly. But we also need it now more than ever. If you can donate to keep the Canary afloat while we resolve our debanking crisis, then you can do so here…..
“Frequency” isn’t a thing in itself but a describer of a wave or vibration, so you must say what any frequencies apply to – eg Sound, light, EM waves. What is it? There’s no technolgy that can alter the JetStream. Of course there’s plenty of charlatans who claim grants & write dodgy patents to do this and more impossible things There was a lot of “clever” talk, in the Video of “Heat-Domes”. These are nothing new, just journalise for what’s called an “Omega-Block” of High pressure – in this case largely on the continent /East UK with Low pressure ~Biscay, driving African Air Northward. Hence the heat. At the same time it was COLD IN RUSSIA. Was this Global COOLING?! Our WeatherAction solar-magnetic activity based forecast correctly identified this situation from 8 weeks ahead. The Omega-Block was a RESULT of WORLD jet stream patterns. These can’t be changed by any technolgy because they and solar-magnetic activity is so powerful compared with Man’s resources. Apart from sunshine which delivers 10 to power 17 Watts to Earth; the solar wind of 1 million mph particles hits the magnetosphere & ionosphere with 10 to power 12 W. ALL the electric power of the UK is only 1% of that. So, no way can man produce enough power to beat the power of sunshine or the solar wind, let alone know what to direct where! Claims of patents for “ionospheric heating” (which wouldn’t anyway affect the JetStream which is BELOW the stratosphere, which is way below the ionosphere) technology are charlatan’s claims to CON “Save The Planet” politicians into parting with your money. They claim heating of 100deg or so compared with 4000degC which wildly fluctuates to half that, for ionospheric electron temperature. Such heating is not measurable or of any importance even if possible. Grandiose talk of “ionospheric heating” is copycatting charlatans word salads and promotes their #WeatherControlCON. There’s no end of grandiose word salads that can be made. Here’s another: “Tropo-pausal rectification of solar wind shock waves”. It’s DN (Delusional Nonsense) we made up as an example. Treaties about or “banning” of ChemTrailing/ “Weather/climate Modification” – which can’t be done; are also a PSYOP game to make you believe it’s possible AND NECESSARY so you’re READY TO BE ROBBED AND CONTROLLED. THINK! #WeatherControl Mania is a distraction from deadly important matters now. 600,000 US citizens have been killed by vax boosters. Vaxxed children get 22x more chronic diseases than vax-free. DN arguments about bogus “technology” in the sky won’t save any of them. The SUN rules! COME TO: “What Drives Weather & Climate?”, #PiersCorbyn’s presentation, SAT 8 AUGUST 2.30pm Glastonbury. Bring questions, Join in, Comment!
It is important to look at what is happening nationally and locally. They are predicting 95% of jobs will be able to be done by AI. **I am editing this line as it is being misunderstood***- AI experts predict that in the future AI will have the capability of doing 95% of jobs. This does not mean this will be adopted but this is a comment about capability. New jobs may also be created which people who previously didn’t have the higher level skill can now do using AI for example vibe coding. If you are interested in this scroll down the comments for the DOAC podcast link. Remember, experts disagree on most major topics so it’s important we listen to both sides and then form our own opinions from this. So when you wonder why cuts have been made in Police what is one way that a government plans to Police? Let’s observed how they have done this in other countries… Mass surveillance – digital ID. If this was working to keep people safe in China, where it is already used, why are there so many children, activist and ethnic minorities that go missing? With all that data and they still don’t stop it. How is it that we have 10 ANPR cameras that I have counted in Braunton alone (not including yellow cameras) yet there has been no release from the Police about the children being approached in Braunton/Chivenor? Why am I learning more about extremely important, relevant news which may affect my kids on Facebook,rather than the Police? Infrastructure like this needs public debate to discuss pros and cons. Not ‘let’s see if we get away with it’. No- we are not having this. Devon is beautiful- it’s amazing because of its culture, way of life and it doesn’t have the intrusion of the mass surveillance of London. That’s why so many people love it here. What do you think?
Contrary to the BBC’s claims that longwave is outdated, energy-intensive, and has few listeners, the report finds those arguments don’t hold up under scrutiny. Firstly, on energy. The BBC argues longwave is inefficient. But Thornes’ analysis reveals that longwave uses just 4% of the BBC’s analogue output power. In fact, FM networks consume significantly more energy — up to six times as much — due to the hundreds of transmitters required to reach the same audience. Moreover, analogue radios — especially longwave — use far less energy than digital radios, smart speakers, or internet-connected devices. But it’s not just about the environment. The report highlights the crucial role of longwave in national security. In an age of cyber threats and misinformation, longwave remains the only platform that can reach the entire UK — and much of Europe — from a single transmitter, even during power cuts or internet outages. And while some dismiss longwave as obsolete, the report says it’s anything but. It’s still relied on by rural communities, seafarers, and those with limited digital access. The Shipping Forecast, a maritime staple for a century, still depends on the 198 kHz signal. Yet, the BBC has never surveyed those rural or seafaring groups to understand their listening habits. There’s also a strong heritage argument. 2025 marks 100 years since the BBC first broadcast on longwave. Campaigners want to see the Droitwich transmitter — which began broadcasting in 1934 — protected as a historic site. A petition to save longwave has already gathered nearly 5,000 signatures, with listeners from across the UK and Europe describing it as a “lifeline” and “a vital backup in emergencies.” Dr. Thornes concludes that ending longwave would not only risk leaving millions without reliable radio access — it could also weaken the UK’s emergency broadcast resilience. He calls on the BBC and the government to reconsider.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y3EMPkuS6V0
you can even look to just the days of the week the days of the week are named after false gods and planets in English Saturday Sunday and Monday are named for Saturn and Saturn of course a representation of Satan the remaining four days are named for gods that the Anglo-Saxons probably worshiped before they migrated to England Tuesday is the name for the god Tew t-i-w and he was probably associated with Warfare just like the Roman God of Mars Wednesday is named for the god woden who’s paralleled with the Roman god Mercury Thursday’s thunor’s day or to give the word its Old English form Thun rizdog or the day of thunder and Friday is the only weekday named for a female deity and that’s frig the concept of the week that’s a cycle of seven numbered or named days with one of them usually Sunday or Monday mixed as the first was originally associated with the Jewish calendar and this was complicated by the fact that early Medieval Europe inherited its idea of the week from Imperial Rome via the Christian church but as you can see these unseen forces these old ones these ancient gods are still here with us many many years ago Confucius told us that its signs and symbols rule the world not rules nor laws and this is one of the ways that we can see the old gods returning the ancient ones is through symbolism symbolism is another language it’s an ancient language and oftentimes we’ll find more truth and evidence through the symbols than we will from people’s words and just as further confirmation that it is Anubis symbolically on those testing units and not an aardvark here’s another testing unit that’s been painted with the Egyptian pyramids symbolically representing the occult principle of As Above So Below this right here was another clear example symbolically of the ancient ones returning the Roman Coliseum is a world heritage site and it’s listed among the new seven wonders of the world it’s claimed it’s the most visited tourist destination in the world as well but now there’s a Canaanite deity that’s associated heavily with child sacrifice placed right at the entrance the Coliseum was once a place that saw Christians fed to Lions killed by Gladiators sometimes rolled into pitch and then set on fire with torches the Coliseum now seems to have erected Molech as its God Molech has been associated with human abortion for thousands of years the name molik is believed to have originated with the Phoenician MLK which referred to a type of sacrifice along with ritual prostitution this deity required the death of babies to appease him and then we have this right here it’s called the giant it’s from a company in Ireland and they’re bringing these moving statues to different cities all throughout America it’s 10 stories tall and covered with millions of LED pixels that allow it to take the form of any person you can also speak through it we’re truly living in strange times in its own right this statute can be said to be an impressive combination of technology and art but for many Believers myself included it’s very creepy and it gives an unsettling feeling as it draws my mind to Nebuchadnezzar’s statue in Daniel 3 and ultimately to the image of the Beast that will be built during the tribulation by the order of the false prophet remember this scripture and he deceives those who dwell on the Earth by those signs which he was granted to do in the sight of the Beast telling those who dwell on the earth to make an image to the Beast who is wounded By The Sword.
The Bristol Politics Show Android and Apple app is now in its second year and gives listeners a weekly update every Friday evening plus a searchable database of longer interviews/stories from many years of broadcasts Tony’s paperback Traitors Of Arnhem , Siege Of Heaven ; Siege Of Heaven Reader – all available for donation, or to buy, via www.bilderberg.org NOT The BCfm Politics Show CANCELLED and attempts to intimidate us
July 2024 – Tony, Dave and Martin’s NOT The BCfm Politics show was CANCELLED/EVICTED in a no fault, no notice, no appeal, eviction by The People’s Republic of Stokes Croft (PRSC) arts centre – An email from Chloe Slater and Keith Cowling explained that: ‘Transphobic’ leaflets had been left in the building by a recent guest (who denied it) making Transsexual users of the building feel ‘offended’ and ‘unsafe’. To quote: ‘Please let us know when you or Dave would like to come and retrieve your equipment and drop off your keys. Kind regards’ PRSC Directors (Keith Cowling, chair) PRSC / Stokes Croft China 17-35 Jamaica St Bristol BS2 8JP. Chloe Slater (formerly Jez and self-defined as ‘she’) also made it difficult for us to retrieve the last of our equipment by inferring we couldn’t be trusted, we were made to wait outside their building for over 30 minutes to return their mixing desk in December 2024. March 2020 – BCfm’s weekly Politics Show presented by Tony Gosling with Irish Republican Labour activist Martin Summers was forced off FM, now online only by station manager Pat Hart. He decided the show should be ‘rested, due to the pandemic’ on 24 March 2020 and then refused to communicate at all when we requested to do the show remotely. Bristol Community FM (BCfm) charity ‘CEO’ Patrick Hart is a longtime personal friend of Bristol’s all-powerful right-wing ‘Labour’ mayor Marvin Rees. Now on Internet only NOT The BCfm Politics Show is available 17:00-c. 21:00 live on Fridays. Pat Hart replaced us with an inane student show repeating MSM stories called The Bristol Agenda . If you’d like to share your views on his deliberate dumbing-down and pro-Covid jab mismanagement you can contact UK broadcasting regulator Ofcom or BCfm board chair and the ‘Don’ himself, here .
i-Contact Video Network to distribute documentaries on VHS video and DVD and to make their own documentaries as well as attend news events and sell video footage to TV news channels. Amongst the films we distributed were Operation Solstice, Coconut Revolution, Mark Purdey and Organophosphates, McLibel, 9/11 In Plane Site, Ludicrous Diversion and The Battle of Trafalgar. These, plus books, and even a board game about drug dealing ‘Dollars and Dibble’, were all available via mail order and we supplied libraries around the world too. The bank had clearly been ordered to investigate us for money laundering, although they never admitted it. All the questions they asked Ben and I were about proving our identity through passports etc.. When we did, yet more letters kept arriving demanding more proofs, birth certificates etc. and eventually when one of us missed supplying the required information, within a week or so of being asked, the account was summarily closed and we got a cheque made out to one of us with the few hundred pounds that was in the business bank account. Since neither of us could get a business bank account up and running for at least a few months and the bank account meant nobody could any longer use the website, we made the reluctant decision to shut it down. Thus was a thriving business killed off by the Co_operative bank. Having said that, co-op were not quite the worst. We did apply to open an account at Bristol’s ‘ethical’ Triodos bank, who proceeded to string us along for several months and then said our business was too risky for them to provide an account!
(from c. 11pm) This week’s full interview mp3s, bottom of page. SHOW STARTS 17:00 London time FOR c. 3½ HRS TO c. 20:30 – OUR LIVE STREAM to Listen live online. Alt. live stream, DJ Plug Radio OR Download Show After Transmission HERE. Repeats 11 & 5 AM & PM daily on our stream
Being investigated by ‘Parliamentary Standards Commissioner’ who supports Israeli genocide. Parliament watchdog accused of bias over treatment of pro-Israel politicians Exclusive: Daniel Greenberg voiced support for Israeli war on Gaza months after taking up role as independent commissioner The parliamentary standards commissioner has been accused of bias after dismissing a complaint against dozens of pro-Israel MPs. Declassified can reveal how Daniel Greenberg – who is meant to be impartial – voiced support for Israel’s assault on Gaza after being appointed to his role in 2023. He also once implied that any Israeli who refused to serve in the IDF was “a coward and a parasite”. The comments have raised questions over his refusal last year to investigate whether MPs should formally declare their roles in Labour Friends of Israel (LFI), which just last month sent a delegation to meet the country’s president. In October, Greenberg twice rejected a complaint about the MPs, suggesting there was no need for them to be transparent about their involvement with LFI because their roles were not sufficiently “significant and formal”. This is despite some holding “vice-chair” positions. LFI is funded by anonymous donors and was described as a “lobbying organisation” by one of its former directors. A full list of its supporters, which included Keir Starmer and David Lammy, was deleted from the group’s website shortly before the election last year. None of the MPs have declared their roles in parliament’s register of interests. As standards commissioner, Greenberg is responsible for conducting “impartial” investigations to enforce transparency in the register of interests. But two former members of parliament’s standards committee have now questioned his judgement, with one saying he “ought to recuse himself” over complaints relating to Israel. In 2012, Greenberg wrote a blog post about military service in Israel, criticising “boys hiding behind their religous [sic] books in order to evade army service”. He said that his son had recently emigrated to Israel and had been signed up for military service. Greenberg wrote: “….he could have avoided it pretty much forever had he chosen to… But my son prefers to be able to look himself in the face in the morning than to avoid army service.” “If you live in a country where the borders need guarding, then you take your turn in guarding them: otherwise, what are you but a coward and a parasite, living off the efforts of others?” Greenberg continued to publicly voice opinions about Israel even after he was appointed to his role as standards commissioner in January 2023. In November of that year, he described Israel’s assault on Gaza as a “a war for its survival” that “we have to fight”. He later added that innocent civilians in Gaza are “living a hell on earth that I cannot even properly imagine”. And last year he accused certain Orthodox Jews who “shirk responsibility” towards Israel’s military of “cowardly self-delusion”. The commissioner added that those who join the army find themselves in “good company on the battlefield”.
ECRR 2003 was dedicated to Prof. Alice M Stewart, the first scientist to demonstrate the exquisite sensitivity of the human organism to ionizing radiation. The first Chair of the ECRR. The Committee dedicated the 2010 volume to the memory of Prof. Edward P Radford. Radford was appointed Chair of the BEIR III committee of the US National Academy of Sciences. His BEIR report in 1979 drew attention to the inadequacies of the then-current radiation risk model. It was withdrawn and suppressed but he resigned and published a dissenting report. His career was destroyed. In 2009 the ECRR awarded the Ed Radford Memorial Prize, donated by his widow Jennifer and the Radford family in the USA to Prof. Yuri I Bandashevsky who first drew attention to the effects of internal radioactivity from Chernobyl on the health of the children of Belarus and was rewarded by arrest and imprisonment. This 2025 report is dedicated to Dr Herman Müller, who, as early as 1952 accurately warned about the dangers to the genetic integrity of human beings resulting from the contamination of the biosphere by fission and nuclear fuel cycle radionuclides. The Committee would like to acknowledge considerable debt to the late Stuart Smith, Esq, of New Orleans for his constant support and encouragement. 1. Preamble: The ECRR– Necessity for revisions to the Risk Model 6 2. Executive Summary 13 3 Scientific Method, Causation and Proof 22 4 The history of the construction and maintenance of the historic (ICRP) radiation risk model 25 5. Information Control, Scientific Dishonesty, failure of Government. 41 6 New evidence of failure of the ICRP model since ECRR2010 52 6.1 The dishonesty of the Japanese Lifespan Study (LSS) 52 6.2 The LSS revisited with an unexposed control group shows that the principal source of the Hiroshima cancer risk was not the prompt gamma ray and neutron exposure but was the internal exposure to residual Uranium-234 particulates from the black rain residues. 54 6.3 Studies of nuclear workers 57 6.4 Nuclear powered ship sailors have large excess cancer risk 60 6.5 Cancer risk in those living near nuclear sites 61 6.6 Medical exposures: CAT scans. Feb 12th 2025 64 6.7 Child leukemia 65 6.8 Birth defects after Chernobyl 66 6.9 Thyroid cancer after Chernobyl and Fukushima 67 6.10 Atmospheric nuclear weapons tests. 68 7 Society and Justification. Radiation cancer compensation. 71 8.The biological basis of radiation protection; dose response 80 9. The biological basis of radiation protection; modelling effects 85 10. Radium and Thorotrast studies 116 11. Estimating the effects of internal contamination 125 12. Child leukemia as an indicator for radiation effects 128 13. Ionizing radiation genetic damage and birth defects 147 14 Radiation, survival and lifespan—genetic selection pressure and its downside. 161 15. Other evidence since ECRR2010 171 15.1 Non cancer illnesses and conditions 171 15.2 Fracking 172 15.3 Radiation induced Dementia 173 15.4 Nuclear ships 175 16. The 2025 recommendations of the ECRR 178 17. The credibility of ICRP 182 Appendix A The ECRR2003/2010 dosimetric system 186 Appendix B Revised ECRR2010 hazard enhancement factors 205
July 2024 – Tony, Dave and Martin’s NOT The BCfm Politics show was CANCELLED/EVICTED in a no fault, no notice, no appeal, eviction by The People’s Republic of Stokes Croft (PRSC) arts centre – An email from Chloe Slater and Keith Cowling explained that: ‘Transphobic’ leaflets had been left in the building by a recent guest (who denied it) making Transsexual users of the building feel ‘offended’ and ‘unsafe’. To quote: ‘Please let us know when you or Dave would like to come and retrieve your equipment and drop off your keys. Kind regards’ PRSC Directors (Keith Cowling, chair) PRSC / Stokes Croft China 17-35 Jamaica St Bristol BS2 8JP. Chloe Slater (formerly Jez and self-defined as ‘she’) also made it difficult for us to retrieve the last of our equipment by inferring we couldn’t be trusted, we were made to wait outside their building for over 30 minutes to return their mixing desk in December 2024. 
[UPDATE channel restored by YT in July 2025] October 2022 – Tony’s Public Enquiry Channel opened in March 2008, with 13 million views, over 1,600 videos and 26,000 subscribers is removed under false pretences by YouTube – A video Tony recorded in New Zealand ‘Bill Gates, ID2020 & Revelation: Quaker Tony Gosling on Covid 19 & the Bible’ and uploaded on 8th April 2020 got a ‘third strike’ but YouTube’s ‘medical misinformation’ regime was introduced in September 2021 so should not have included as ‘strikes’ videos uploaded before that date. Documentary makers are just about the only public interest investigators left in the NATO zone. From the top down, our mainstream media, police, political parties & intelligence services are being compromised by feudal banksters, secret societies and the mafia. Key people intimidated by psychopathic black magic types and their pliable drones who will even kill to take over positions of power? Just search for “John Scarlett” and “Dodgy Dossier” and you’ll see what I mean. The Zionists are every bit as fundamentalist and twisted as the leaders and followers of ISIS. Register here and join us in the discussion as we wriggle free of the psychopaths, back to sanity http://www.911forum.org.uk
March 2020 – BCfm’s weekly Politics Show presented by Tony Gosling with Irish Republican Labour activist Martin Summers was forced off FM, now online only by station manager Pat Hart. He decided the show should be ‘rested, due to the pandemic’ on 24 March 2020 and then refused to communicate at all when we requested to do the show remotely. Bristol Community FM (BCfm) charity ‘CEO’ Patrick Hart is a longtime personal friend of Bristol’s all-powerful right-wing ‘Labour’ mayor Marvin Rees. Now on Internet only NOT The BCfm Politics Show is available 17:00-c. 21:00 live on Fridays. Pat Hart replaced us with an inane student show repeating MSM stories called The Bristol Agenda. If you’d like to share your views on his deliberate dumbing-down and pro-Covid jab mismanagement you can contact UK broadcasting regulator Ofcom or BCfm board chair and the ‘Don’ himself, here.
February 2019 – Ofcom complaint result: UKLFI exposed as creation of Israeli foreign ministry – Bristol Post article: BCfm cleared after being reported to Ofcom for anti-semitic conspiracy theories – It could have resulted in BCfm radio station being shut down if the complaint was upheld Tony Gosling reported to Ofcom by UK Lawyers for Israel after being accused of anti-semitism A Bristol radio station, which had one of its programmes reported for anti-semitism and racism has been cleared by Ofcom. The radio regulatory body received a complaint from “UK Lawyers for Israel’ over a show on BCfm radio, hosted by investigative journalist Tony Gosling. The weekly politics show, on the popular community radio station based in Easton, was reported for several allegations on a show which aired on November 23. Tony Gosling, who was a former BBC journalist between 1989 and 1993, has been producing and presenting ‘The Tony Gosling Politics’ show every week on BCFM radio for 11 years. They have released a statement which reads: “Whilst we are supportive of all our volunteer presenters, The Tony Gosling Politics Show only represents approximately ten percent of our political output content wise, and less than two per cent of our entire weekly output.” Mr Gosling’s programme looks at local politics and he interviews a range of councillors and MPs in the city. The show is also perhaps more well known for its alternative look at international politics, and he has a cult following online from across the world. Mr Gosling has made regular appearances on national media including the politics show with Andrew Neil on BBC One, and international channels such as Russia Today, Channel1 Russia, NTV, and recently for both Turkish and Lebanon TV.
November 2012 – Tony gets death threats on the phone from the Jewish Defence League – ‘you’re a dead man walking’ – a man calls him and Tony records the call. Audio of UK Jewish Defence League (JDL) death threat against British journalist Tony Gosling (2012) – Avon and Somerset police Special Branch investigate, trace the caller, and after six months report to Tony that the individual has been served a caution that they will proceed with a prosecution for harassment under the 1861 offences against the person act. Seems pretty clear this death threat was issued alongside the lies, copied below, which were published on their blog by London based UK JDL in November 2012. Firstly Tony Gosling is not a ‘homophobe’. That accusation was first made in an article published by the ‘Harry’s Place’ blog, penned by Zionist David Toube and propelled by him anonymously into Private Eye in 2008. It refers to Gosling’s criticism of senior teachers at Bannerman Road Primary school in Bristol who used homosexual early learning picture books against the express wishes of the parent governors. His criticism was about the deception by teaching staff not because of the homosexual content of the books. Secondly, if you follow the JDL link you’ll find what Tony Gosling actually says about the ‘Protocols Of The Learned Elders Of Zion’ says “…I don’t think there is much doubt that the Protocols are fake…” Thirdly he is not a member of Bristol Palestine Solidarity Campaign and has never been to any of their meetings.
Autumn 2014 – Tony’s documentary production and distribution business shut down by its bank. Our thriving Co-op business bank account ordered closed for undisclosed reasons. Tony Gosling and Ben Edwards founded i-Contact Video Network to distribute documentaries on VHS video and DVD and to make their own documentaries as well as attend news events and sell video footage to TV news channels. Amongst the films we distributed were Operation Solstice, Coconut Revolution, Mark Purdey and Organophosphates, McLibel, 9/11 In Plane Site, Ludicrous Diversion and The Battle of Trafalgar. These, plus books, and even a board game about drug dealing ‘Dollars and Dibble’, were all available via mail order and we supplied libraries around the world too. The bank had clearly been ordered to investigate us for money laundering, although they never admitted it. All the questions they asked Ben and I were about proving our identity through passports etc.. When we did, yet more letters kept arriving demanding more proofs, birth certificates etc. and eventually when one of us missed supplying the required information, within a week or so of being asked, the account was summarily closed and we got a cheque made out to one of us with the few hundred pounds that was in the business bank account. Since neither of us could get a business bank account up and running for at least a few months and the bank account meant nobody could any longer use the website, we made the reluctant decision to shut it down. Thus was a thriving business killed off by the Co_operative bank. Having said that, co-op were not quite the worst. We did apply to open an account at Bristol’s ‘ethical’ Triodos bank, who proceeded to string us along for several months and then said our business was too risky for them to provide an account! 
Donald Mack, community worker and comedian, and Paul MacDonnell, Chair of Reform UK Wells and Mendips, join Tony. They introduce themselves and their work. 
