Author: Tony Gosling

MP3 of Friday 4th July 2025 show [right click to download] (from c. 11pm) This week’s full interview mp3s, bottom of page. SHOW STARTS 17:00 London time FOR c. 3½ HRS TO c. 20:30 – OUR LIVE STREAM to Listen live online. Alt. live streams RadioQUK.com, DJ Plug Radio OR Download Show After Transmission HERE. Repeats 11 & 5 AM & PM daily on our stream
Download NOT THE BCFM POLITICS SHOW [ANDROID APP (1)] Alternatives [GITHUB (2)] and [APKPURE (3)] – or the [Apple App store] – PS. You can replace evil Google Play, which banned us, with [the Aurora store]
Only 31% trust the UK Press! – UK media oligopoly TONY’S BOOKS: Bilderberg.org – 2 PAPER–BACKS – TONY’S CHANNELS: Telegram – Bitchute – 911 forum – Radio4All – The Land Is Ours – VK – Twitter/X – Farcebook – Brighteon – Rumble – RT Live on Rumble –  Goebbelsesque YouTube: The Wrong Story; Peter Borenius; Occult Geopolitics & cancelled Public Enquiry

Radio4All mp3 audio files usually available from 23:00 2-4hrs, after TX – we’ll credit you if you rebroadcast. Any probs. mp3s should be on alternative links below by then

Part One – Local and National News Review

Palestine Action to be deemed a terrorist group. Bob Vylan ‘Death to IDF’ chant at Glastonbury festival this week. Bob Vylan Defend Glastonbury ‘Death to the IDF’ Chant: ‘I Said What I Said’ The English punk group performed ahead of Kneecap on Saturday and also urged the crowd to chant “free Palestine” GLASTONBURY, ENGLAND – JUNE 28: Bobby Vylan of Bob Vylan crowdsurfs in front of the West Holts stage during day four of Glastonbury festival 2025 at Worthy Farm, Pilton on June 28, 2025 in Glastonbury, England. Established by Michael Eavis in 1970, Glastonbury has grown into the UK’s largest music festival, drawing over 200,000 fans to enjoy performances across more than 100 stages. In 2026, the festival will take a fallow year, a planned pause to allow the Worthy Farm site time to rest and recover. English punk duo Bob Vylan stirred up controversy over the weekend for chanting “Death, death to the IDF” during their performance at Glastonbury. Following the set, singer Bobby Vylan, who uses a stage name, defended his onstage remarks in a lengthy Instagram post captioned, “I said what I said.” Vylan shared that he had been “inundated with messages of both support and hatred.” He explained that he was inspired by his daughter responding to a survey on school meals and that “listening to her voice her opinion” reminded him that “we may not be doomed after all.” “Teaching our children to speak up for the change they want and need is the only way that we make this world a better place,” he wrote. “As we grow older and our fire possibly starts to dim under the suffocation of adult life and all its responsibilities, it is incredibly important that we encourage and inspire future generations to pick up the torch that was passed to us. Let us display to them loudly and visibly the right thing to do when we want and need change. Let them see up marching in the streets, campaigning on ground level, organising online and shouting about it on any and every stage that we are offered. Today it is a change in school dinners, tomorrow it is a change in foreign policy.”

Origin of Glastonbury Festival in the Windsor/Stonehenge Peoples Free Festival – from Windsor to the Beanfield a short film by Neil Goodwin. Don Aitken, from the Festival Welfare Services, delivers a short history of the People’s Free Festival,, from Windsor to Stonehenge, delving inside the police’s mindset prior to and during the Beanfield in 1985, the UK’s drift into becoming a police state, and police inconsistencies during The Beanfield trial in 1990/91. Part of the ‘Operation Solstice’ video archive, most of it unseen, released in time for the 40th Anniversary of The Beanfield on June 1 2025. The Windsor Free Festival was a British free festival held in Windsor Great Park from 1972 to 1974. Organised by some London commune dwellers, notably Ubi Dwyer and Sid Rawle, it was in many ways the forerunner of the Stonehenge Free Festival, particularly in the brutality of its final suppression by the police, which led to a public outcry about the tactics involved. The first Festival in 1972 was promoted as “Rent Strike: The People’s Free Festival”, reflecting the political concerns of the organisers (coming as they did from squatting and commune movements), with an anti-monarchist choice of site in “the Queen’s back garden”. Attendance was about 700 in its first year, rising to 8,000 in 1973, and an even larger crowd in its final year. The 1974 Festival, due to last for ten days, was broken up on the sixth morning by a large number of police. Early on Wednesday 28 August 1974 the site was invaded by hundreds of officers from the Thames Valley police force with truncheons drawn, who gave the remaining participants ten minutes to leave. Those who did not were arrested or evicted with a level of force that led seven national newspapers to call for an inquiry, and Roy Jenkins, the Home Secretary, to call for a report from the Thames Valley Chief Constable. Nicholas Albery, playwright Heathcote Williams and his partner Diana Senior successfully sued David Holdsworth, the Thames Valley Chief Constable for creating a riotous situation in which the police attacked the plaintiffs.[2] In 1975 both Ubi Dwyer and Sid Rawle were imprisoned, for attempting to promote a 1975 Windsor Festival. A further attempt to return to Windsor in 1978 led to another arrest for Dwyer. The government provided an abandoned airfield at Watchfield in 1975, in response to the public outrage, and as a means of moving the festival away from Royal castles.

BILDERBERG SPEAKS 1: Health Secretary Wes Streeting, slated for greatness and now a ‘Bilderberg spokesman’ comments on ‘Death death to the IDF’ chant at Glastonbury and destruction in Gaza. Streeting condemns anti-IDF chants at Glastonbury but says ‘Israel should get its own house in order’ Minister says BBC and festival organisers have questions to answer over broadcasting of chants during Bob Vylan set Chants of death to the Israeli military at Glastonbury were “appalling” and the BBC and the festival have questions to answer, Wes Streeting has said, while adding that Israel needs to “get its own house in order”. The health secretary said the chanting should not have been broadcast to those watching at home, highlighting that Israelis at a similar music festival were kidnapped, murdered and raped. “I thought it’s appalling, to be honest, and I think the BBC and Glastonbury have got questions to answer about how we saw such a spectacle on our screens,” he told Sunday Morning with Trevor Phillips on Sky News. “But I also think it’s a pretty shameless publicity stunt, which I don’t really want to give too much indulgence to for that reason.” He also had strong words for Israel, which has condemned the chanting. Streeting said what people should be talking about in the context of Israel and Gaza is the humanitarian catastrophe in the territory and the fact that Israeli settlers attacked a Christian village in the West Bank this week.

Western secret services and attacks. First female head of MI6 – grandfather a bloodthirsty Nazi spy. New MI6 chief’s grandfather was Nazi spy known as ‘The Butcher’ Blaise Metreweli’s grandfather was Hitler’s chief informant in Chernihiv who boasted of killing Jews The grandfather of the new head of MI6 was a spy for the Nazis who was known as ‘The Butcher’, it was reported. Blaise Metreweli was appointed earlier this month as the first female spy chief in the Secret Intelligence Service’s 116-year history. According to an archive of documents reported by the Daily Mail, her grandfather, Constantine Dobrowolski, was a Nazi collaborator who boasted of killing Jews. Dobrowolski, who was Ukrainian, defected from the Red Army to become Adolf Hitler’s chief informant in the Chernihiv region, the newspaper reported. Ms Metreweli, 47, never met her grandfather. He stayed in Nazi-occupied Ukraine when his family fled the Red Army’s liberation of the region in 1943. Documents uncovered in a German archive reportedly show that Dobrowolski was known as ‘Agent No 30’ by the Nazis. At one point the Soviet Union put a bounty on Dobrowolski of 50,000 roubles – worth about £200,000 now – and called him “the worst enemy of the Ukrainian people”. According to the newspaper, Dobrowolski wanted revenge on Russia for killing his family and seizing their estate in the revolution of 1917. One file reportedly contains a handwritten letter from Dobrowolski to his Nazi superiors signed: “Heil Hitler”. In another, he boasts of “personally” taking part “in the extermination of the Jews” and killing hundreds of Ukrainian soldiers. Ms Metreweli grew up abroad before studying anthropology at Cambridge, where she was in the winning crew in the 1997 Boat Race. She joined MI6 in 1999 and served the agency in Europe and the Middle East for two decades. Ms Metreweli currently holds the position of “Q”, the head of the service’s technical branch, made famous by the James Bond films.

BILDERBERG SPEAKS 2: ex-MI6 boss John Sawers at Bilderberg – C4 News week before Israel attacks on Iran. Le Cercle – retired intelligence. Netanyahu wants destruction of Iran regime – as Trump reveals ‘two week’ timeline Channel 4 News Iran is ready to resume negotiations, provided a ceasefire can be reached – that was the assessment of the French government today. Iran’s foreign minister says he will meet his British, French and German counterparts in Geneva tomorrow. But as Israel’s offensive against Iran entered its seventh day, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu insisted that he was committed to “destroying the nuclear threat aimed at our annihilation”. Overnight Israel’s military said it targeted the Khondab nuclear site near the Iranian city of Arak as well as nuclear sites near Natanz and Isfahan. Meanwhile, Iran continued to fire missiles at Israel. One hit a hospital in the southern Israeli city of Be’er Sheva, but there were no serious injuries. We spoke with General Ben Hodges – formerly the commander of US troops in Europe – and former spy chief Sir John Sawers at the Chatham House annual conference.

Declassified – MI6 infiltrated IAEA. Decapitation strikes.  MI6 Agent Allegedly Infiltrated IAEA to Shape Iran Sanctions Strategy, Report Claims Vienna, July 3, 2025 (Agencies) — A veteran British intelligence officer allegedly operated within the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) to influence global sanctions policy against Iran, according to a report by investigative outlet The Grayzone, citing leaked documents from a UK intelligence-linked entity known as Torchlight. The operative, identified as Nicholas Langman, is said to have played a pivotal role in coordinating Western sanctions during his tenure at the UK Foreign Office’s Counter-Proliferation Centre between 2010 and 2012. His resume, reportedly found among the leaked files, claims he led inter-agency teams to counter the spread of weapons of mass destruction and provided strategic support to both the IAEA and the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW). Langman also allegedly facilitated diplomatic coordination with senior officials across the US, Europe, and the Middle East, contributing to what he described as the “major diplomatic success” of the Iran nuclear sanctions framework. The revelations come amid heightened scrutiny of the IAEA’s impartiality. Iranian officials have long accused the agency of leaking sensitive data to adversaries. Tensions escalated last month when Israeli and US forces launched coordinated strikes on Iranian nuclear scientists and facilities, reportedly using intelligence linked to IAEA monitoring. Iran has since suspended cooperation with the agency, barred Director General Rafael Grossi from entering the country, and halted routine inspections. The IAEA’s June 12 report accused Iran of violating the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), though no direct evidence of a weapons program was presented. The following day, Israel initiated its strikes, triggering a 12-day conflict that ended in a US-brokered ceasefire. Russia has also condemned the IAEA’s role, with Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova stating that agency data was used to plan the attacks, calling it a “colossal blow” to the watchdog’s credibility. The IAEA has not yet responded to the allegations. If substantiated, the claims could further erode trust in the agency’s neutrality and complicate future diplomatic efforts surrounding Iran’s nuclear program.

Banning Palestine Action: How the UK Government is Silencing Dissent The proscription of Palestine Action will come into effect on Saturday unless the High Court issues a temporary block on the order today. On Wednesday, MPs voted for the direct action group to be classified as a terrrorist organisation meaning that it will be a criminal offence to be a member of the group and “to invite or recklessly express support for them”. Both of these can be punished by up to 14 years in prison. This decision has huge implications, not only for those who support Palestine Action’s objectives, but for everyone in the UK who wants to view and engage with content about Palestine online. It marks a dangerous escalation in the criminalisation of political dissent in the UK and represents an increase in the UK’s architecture of surveillance. It will impact on other areas of digital and counter-terror policy, including the Prevent Duty and the Online Safety Act.  Palestine Action are a direct action group “committed to ending global participation in Israel’s genocidal and apartheid regime”. Last month, the group came to wider public attention after four of its members broke into RAF Brize Norton and sprayed red paint on the turbines of two Voyager aircraft. As well as military targets, the group also target the UK headquarters of Elbit Systems, an Israeli weapons manufacturer. While the groups actions may constitute criminal damage, their actions do not represent an attempt to induce fear in the population by creating an imminent threat to life. Proscribing Palestine Action puts the group in the same category as Boko Haram, ISIS and the Wagner Group rather than groups such as CND or Trident Ploughshares who have taken similar actions, including damaging military installations and equipment. As Zarah Sultana MP noted in parliament yesterday, it was the Prime Minister in his time as a human rights lawyer who successfully defended a man who broke into RAF Fairford to prevent what they believed were war crimes in Iraq. Proscribing Palestine Action as terrorists is not about public safety – it is about suppressing protest that we may disagree or agree with, but that stands well short of being an attempt to strike fear into the British public through the use of indiscriminate violence against people. In equating support of damage to military property with support of terrorism, it endangers legitimate debate about the UK-Israel arms trade. 

Palestine Action debate in parliament – different views. From  Richard Burgon – not terrorism. Palestine Action being made a ‘terrorist’ group is a symbol of extreme repression and UK police state.  Zara Sultana Coventry MP explains why Palestine Action cannot be a terrorist group -Co-founder of Palestine Action, Huda Ammori, gave the following statement on the court’s decision: We are seeking an urgent appeal to try to prevent a dystopian nightmare of the Government’s making which would see thousands of people across Britain wake up tomorrow to find they had been criminalised overnight for supporting a domestic protest group which sprays red paint on warplanes and disrupts Israel’s largest weapons manufacturer to disrupt the flow of arms to Israel’s genocidal war machine. We will not stop fighting to defend fundamental rights to free speech and protest in our country and to stand up for the rights of the Palestinian people. The Home Secretary is rushing through the implementation of the proscription at midnight tonight despite the fact that our legal challenge is ongoing and that she has been completely unclear about how it will be enforced, leaving the public in the dark about their rights to free speech and expression after midnight tonight when this proscription comes into effect. Hundreds of thousands of people across the country have expressed support for Palestine Action by joining our mailing list, following and sharing our social media content and signing petitions, and many, including iconic figures like Sally Rooney, say they will continue to declare ‘we are all Palestine Action’ and speak out against this preposterous proscription, demonstrating how utterly unworkable it will be. As Justice Chamberlain acknowledged in court today, it is unclear what expressions of support could lead to arrest and potential prosecution with sentences of up to 14 years in prison. We would only have only a few hours to disband our entire organisation and dismantle all of our infrastructure, including closing bank accounts and deleting our mailing list and social media platforms. This is despite the fact that we have not had the opportunity to defend our fundamental rights in court and challenge this unlawful, authoritarian and utterly absurd proscription. If we ultimately succeed in overturning the proscription, we would have to start from scratch, having lost everything we have painstakingly built over five years. As United Nations Special Rapporteurs and experts have told the Government, property damage is not terrorism, and this proscription would even criminalise “innocent members” and supporters for peacefully exercising their rights to freedom of expression and assembly. The “chilling” effect on political protest and advocacy the United Nations experts warn of would be happening at a time when Israel’s genocide is being live-streamed before our eyes – how many more thousands of children would die while we are unable to take action against this Israel’s war crimes and our Government’s complicity? We will not stop fighting to defend fundamental rights to free speech and protest in our country and to stand up for the rights of the Palestinian people. 

Lucy Morgan Edwards went to St Petersburg Economic Forum – her experiences of this.  West’s hybrid war against Russia seeks to destroy EU — diplomat ST. PETERSBURG, June 21. /TASS/. The goal of the West’s hybrid warfare is not so much Russia as the destruction of the EU economy, Foreign Ministry Spokeswoman Maria Zakharova told reporters on the sidelines of the St. Petersburg International Economic Forum (SPIEF). “I am sure that one of the goals of this hybrid warfare is not only Russia, but also the countries of the European Union. The EU has grown too strong, and the euro is too secure. The euro is secure; the dollar is not. It was necessary to influence it somehow,” the diplomat noted. She added that, in this way, the West was able to indirectly influence its European partners. “Many EU countries are on the verge of recession. You can see their economic growth rates, which are the most important indicator for them. They don’t even hide them. You also understand what is happening there. Against the backdrop of Asia’s growing economy, they will never catch up,” Zakharova emphasized. About forum The St. Petersburg International Economic Forum (SPIEF) is taking place on June 18-21. This year, the event is being held under the theme “Shared Values: The Foundation of Growth in a Multipolar World.” Thematic zones such as the ‘Territory of Innovations’ and the national brand space ‘Buy Russian!’ are operating at the Forum. The program includes the SME Forum, the Creative Industries Forum, the Day of the Future International Youth Economic Forum, the Drug Security Forum, and the Roscongress Urban Hub discussion platform. As part of the cultural program, the Petersburg Seasons festival is being held, and the SPIEF Sports Games is taking place. The Roscongress Foundation is the organizer of the St. Petersburg International Economic Forum. TASS is its information partner.

Franchesca Albanese special rapporteur on Human Rights delivers UN report on private corporate and private finance role in Gaza genocide. Forever-Occupation, genocide, and profit: Special Rapporteur’s report exposes corporate forces behind destruction of Palestine 03 July 2025 GENEVA – Israel’s genocide against Palestinians is being sustained by a system of exploitative occupation and profit, a UN expert warned today in a new report to the Human Rights Council that reveals how corporate profiteering and monetary gain has enabled and legitimised Israel’s illegal presence and actions. “In the past 21 months, while Israel’s genocide has devastated Palestinian lives and landscapes, the Tel Aviv stock exchange soared by 213 percent (USD), amassing $225.7 billion in market gains—including $67.8 billion in the past month alone. For some, genocide is profitable,” said Francesca Albanese, the UN Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the Palestinian territory occupied since 1967. Albanese’s report exposes the corporate infrastructure profiting from Israel’s economy of occupation — and its deadly transformation into an economy of genocide. The report underscores how Palestine has become the epicentre of a global reckoning, exposing the failure of international business and legal systems to uphold even the most basic rights of one of the world’s most dispossessed peoples. “Corporate actors are deeply entwined in the system of occupation, apartheid and genocide in the occupied Palestinian territory,” the Special Rapporteur said. “For decades, Israel’s repression of Palestinian people has been scaffolded by corporations, fully aware of and yet indifferent to, decades of human rights violations and international crimes.” Forty-eight separate corporate actors, along with their parents, subsidiaries, franchisees, licensees and consortium partners across sectors are identified in the Special Rapporteur’s report, including weapons manufacturers, technological corporations, financial institutions and construction and energy firms. Albanese found that these entities have failed their most basic legal responsibilities to exercise their leverage to bring an end to the violation at stake or terminate relations and disengage. Instead, they have treated Israel’s illegal enterprise in the occupied Palestinian territory as ordinary economic activity—wilfully ignoring documented, systemic abuses, even as atrocities mounted after 7 October 2023.

Lucy Morgan-Edwards names powerful unaccountable UK Deep State war criminals 1: Chris Donnelly, ARCHITECT OF THE FAKE RUSSIAN THREAT TO TO EUROPE Christopher Nigel Donnelly is a UK deep politician who was a “special adviser” to four NATO secretaries general for 13 years, as well as to UK Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher. He also co-founded the Institute for Statecraft (which he directs) and its offshoot Integrity Initiative. Until the Integrity Initiative Leak on 5 November 2018, he was little known outside of deep political circles. A NATO biography from 2003 stated that “His current major interest is in the reform of defence and security establishments in Central and Eastern European countries following the end of the Cold War”. From 1970 to 1993, Chris Donnelly served as a reserve officer in Britain’s Territorial Army.[In 2018, ‘b’ suggested for the Moon of Alabama that “Donnelly seems to be obsessed with the ‘Russian threat’ and is determined to fight it by all means.” Donnelly wrote several of the documents in the Integrity Initiative Leak, which suggest he is suffering from a severe permanent war mentality and sees the world in one-dimensional “for us or against us” terms. Activities “Donnelly was at one time adviser to Margaret Thatcher. From 1989-2003, he was a Special Adviser for central and eastern Europe to the secretary general of NATO. In fact, he served four secretaries general, including Lord Robertson.” In 2003, Donnelly founded the Advanced Research and Assessment Group, which Wikipedia reported in 2020 “brought together experts from the military, academia and other fields in “research clusters” dedicated to specific areas of concern, in order to provide policy-makers with focussed analysis of international security issues.” In 2010, Donnelly took part in Security and Defence Learning/2010, with at least one fellow IfS member Jeffrey McCausland. The discussions were chaired by another member of the IfS, politician/spook Harold Elletson. Donnelly was a director of the Active Change Foundation for over 9 years. Donnelly’s claim that “Russia is happy to accept bribery, using organized crime as a tool” was reported by the BBC in Russian in 2014. Chris Donnelly told @BBCJLandale at #TMSRussia that the poisoning of Sergei Skripal was an “act of war”. Crimean Bridge In October 2022, a secret British intelligence plot to intervene in the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine was revealed in internal documents and correspondence obtained exclusively by The Grayzone. The April 2022 plan, drawn up at the request of Chris Donnelly, was an elaborate scheme to blow up the Crimean Bridge with the involvement of specially trained Ukrainian soldiers. Almost six months after the plan was circulated, Kerch Bridge was attacked in an October 8th suicide bombing apparently overseen by Ukraine’s SBU intelligence services. The truck bombing of the Kerch Bridge differed operationally from the plot sketched for Chris Donnelly. Yet, Britain’s evident interest in planning such an attack underscores the deep involvement of NATO powers in the Ukraine proxy war.

Lucy Morgan-Edwards names powerful unaccountable UK Deep State war criminals 2: Kim Darroch, ARCHITECT OF THE UKRAINE WAR – In November 2016, following the 2016 United States presidential election, a memo by Sir Kim Darroch to Prime Minister Theresa May was leaked in which he said the President-elect of the United States, Donald Trump, could be influenced by the British government. The following week, Trump tweeted that Nigel Farage should serve as British Ambassador to the United States, which was rejected by Downing Street, which said that there is no vacancy and that the UK has “an excellent ambassador to the US”. Sir Kim Darroch was in London the next day for consultations with Theresa May that were said to have been long planned. 2019 On 7 July 2019, secret diplomatic cables from Darroch to various members and officials of the UK government, dating from 2017 to 2019, were leaked to the Mail on Sunday, including statements such as the Trump administration was ‘inept and insecure’. This drew widespread criticism with Nigel Farage saying Darroch was “totally unsuitable” for office and Sir Bill Cash saying the comments were “toxic”. On 8 July 2019 Donald Trump tweeted that Darroch was “not liked or well thought of within the US” and that “we will no longer deal with him”. On 9 July 2019, Boris Johnson refused to answer whether he would keep Kim Darroch as Britain’s ambassador to the US following the heightened diplomatic tensions between the two nations, as Conservative Party leadership rival Jeremy Hunt told Donald Trump to treat the UK with “respect”. Mr Johnson, the frontrunner to succeed Theresa May as prime minister, said in the only head-to-head televised debate of the Conservative Party leadership race “I’m not going to be so presumptuous” about what date Sir Kim would leave his job. “I and I alone will decide who takes important and politically sensitive jobs,” he said. The former foreign secretary added it was of “fantastic importance” for Britain to have a “close partnership with the US”. He also defended the UK’s apolitical civil service, saying it was “absolutely vital” that official advice “should not be leaked” and “is not politicised” by ministers. Mr Hunt, the outside candidate to get into Number 10, lambasted the president for his “disrespectful and wrong” comments regarding Mrs May and Sir Kim, saying it was the prerogative of the British government to choose its ambassadors. He insisted Sir Kim would remain in post if he were to succeed Mrs May. His intervention came as Sir Kim was forced to withdraw from a planned White House meeting on Tuesday 9 July 2019 after the president stepped up his attacks on the UK’s ambassador, calling him “wacky”, “a very stupid guy”, and “a pompous fool” foisted on the US by Britain.

Lucy Morgan-Edwards names powerful unaccountable UK Deep State war criminals 3: Christopher Steele, POISONER OF SERGEI SKRIPAL IN ZIZIS SALISBURY RESTAURANT AND AUTHOR OF THE STEELE DOSSIER – The Steele dossier, or Trump dossier, was a key part of the attempt to tie the Trump election win in 2016 with Russia. Like all other parts of Russiagate, the sensationalist allegations eventually fizzled out into nothing. In 2017, it was revealed that the dossier was commissioned by Marc Elias, a lawyer at Perkins Coie law firm in Washington, DC, and once represented Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign. Elias hired the Fusion GPS opposition research firm on behalf of the Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee (DNC). The dossier contains allegations of misconduct and conspiracy between Donald Trump’s presidential campaign and the Government of Russia during the 2016 United States presidential election. Campaign members and Russian operatives allegedly colluded to interfere in the election and benefit Trump. The dossier contained the infamous pee tape allegations, which claimed Donald Trump had a urine-soaked run-in with Russian sex workers while staying in the presidential suite at the Ritz-Carlton in Moscow, which then again was filmed by Russian secret services as blackmail material. Publication The dossier was published in full by BuzzFeed on January 10, 2017. Several corporate media outlets criticised BuzzFeed’s decision to release it, but chose to report about it extensively it themselves anyway, as Buzzfeed had whitewashed the dubious claims to respectability. Buzzfeed editor Ben Smith suffered no negative career consequences for it, and in 2022 was rewarded with becoming editor of the generously funded Semafor. MI6 connection Analyst Ludwig De Braeckeleer pointed out that the Mueller Report ignores the following facts on the role the Steele dossier and MI6 played in the Russiagate hoax: Luke Harding “wrote the book Collusion to legitimize Steele’s dossier, [and] has served for a very long time as Steele’s publicist and scribe while conducting similar trysts with other major British intelligence figures. Harding has worked with both Hakluyt and Orbis.” Christopher Steele met with the FBI’s Peter Strzok in July 2016. During the summer of 2016, Robert Hannigan, then head of GCHQ, flew to Washington to brief John Brennan personally. CIA Director John Brennan then briefed Senate Minority leader Harry Reid in August 2016 on the Steele dossier. By this process of washing dubious information, this briefing then led Reid to send FBI Director James Comey a letter demanding an investigation of the collusion between Donald Trump and the Russians. The Steele dossier was also a key foundation for the FISA warrant issued to spy on Trump’s close aide Carter Page, in the hope of finding incriminating information, or getting Page to prejudice himself in police interviews by giving statements conflicting with the tapes.

Lucy Morgan-Edwards names powerful unaccountable UK Deep State war criminals 4: Stefan Halper – Stefan Halper is an influential member of Le Cercle. Halper began his US government career in 1971 in the Executive Office of the President. During the Nixon Administration he held positions in the White House Domestic Council and the Office of Management and Budget. With the Gerald Ford Presidency, Halper moved to the Office of the White House Chief of Staff where he had responsibility for a range of domestic and international issues. In 1977 Halper became Special Counsel to the Congressional Joint Economic Committee and Legislative Assistant to Senator William Roth (R-Del.) October Surprise He was involved in the October Surprise operation to get rid of president Carter. The New York Times reported that for Ronald Reagan’s 1980 campaign, Halper was the “person in charge” of running a “highly secretive” operation to get “inside information” about the Carter Administration’s foreign policy and pass it to the Reagan campaign. Support for George H. W. Bush & Ronald Reagan In 1979 he became National Policy Director for George H. W. Bush’s Presidential campaign and then in 1980 he became Director of Policy Coordination for the Reagan-Bush Presidential campaign. After Reagan entered the White House, Halper became Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Political-Military Affairs. Upon leaving the Department in 1984, he remained an advisor on National Security Affairs to the White House and the Republican National Committee until 1992. Media Influence Halper has contributed to many controlled media outlets including The National Interest, The Washington Times, The Washington Post, The Los Angeles Times, The Wall Street Journal, The American Spectator, the BBC, CNN , SKY News, ABC, CBS, NBC and C-Span. Other Influence Halper has worked as a “foreign policy advisor” to various think-tanks and research institutions, including the Center for Strategic and International Studies, The Center for the National Interest and the Institute for World Politics. He has been a Senior Advisor to the Department of Defense, and on the Advisory Board of Directors of the Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies. Stefan Halper is a member of the Cosmos Club in Washington, and the Travellers Club in London. Business career From 1984 to 1990 Halper was chairman and majority shareholder of the Palmer National Bank of Washington, D.C., the National Bank of Northern Virginia and the George Washington National Bank. Deep politics He visited Le Cercle. Russiagate Halper was a police spy in the Russiagate operation, to get several Trump staffers – including George Papadopoulos – to incriminate themselves

Lucy Morgan-Edwards names powerful unaccountable Deep State war criminals 5: Peter Bergen at CNN – Journalist Peter Bergen produced CNN’s electrifying Osama bin Laden interview from a cave in Afghanistan in 1997. In it, the al-Qaeda leader declared war against the US for the first time to a Western audience. No one knew what to make of it – even Bergen wasn’t sure if bin Laden would follow through on his threat. The interview – conducted by Bergen, CNN war correspondent Peter Arnett, and photographer Peter Jouvenal – landed with a thud when it initially aired in 1997. “There were people at the US government who were interested in him, but it was a very small group,” Bergen said. CNN’s interview became one of the most compelling television moments in history four years later, however, when jets crashed into the World Trade Center, the Pentagon, and a Pennsylvania field killing almost 3,000 people on September 11, 2001. The Islamist group al-Qaeda claimed responsibility and its leader, Osama bin Laden, became the World’s Most Wanted man. The incredible story behind how Bergen brokered the bin Laden interview has all of the hallmarks of a spy thriller tinged with the dogged determination of a journalist intent on interviewing a terrorist even if the situation turned dangerous. And the situation was very dangerous – more so than Bergen realized at the time. “When we went to interview Osama bin Laden, they were very paranoid that we were members of the intelligence community, and I had to really persuade them,” Bergen told the SPYSCAPE Festival, Spies & Storytellers event in New York City. They were also very unsophisticated about the media. They had never really dealt with members of the media.” The prolific author, documentary producer, and VP of Global Studies and Fellows at the New America think tank was born in Minneapolis in 1962. He grew up in London and attended Ampleforth College in North Yorkshire before studying modern history at Oxford University. In 1983, Bergen made a documentary, Refugees of Faith, about Afghan refugees flowing into Pakistan and began studying the region. After NYC’s first World Trade Center bombing killed six people in 1993, it was clear to Bergen that some of the terrorists trained in Afghanistan. Bergen set off to the region once again to find out more about how the NYC attack was planned. He was also interested in Ramzi Yousef, the mastermind of the ‘93 Trade Center attack who was associated with followers of Osama bin Laden. “Increasingly, it looks like a dress rehearsal for the events of September 11,” Bergen said in a C-SPAN interview.

The City of London and the Rothschild Bank at New Court who fund all our politicians and mass media – The City of London was formed when the Romans arrived in Great Britain 2000 years ago and started a trading post on the River Thames. Exactly 1000 years later William the Conqueror (King William III) gave sovereign status to the City of Londoners in 1694 allowing them to continue enjoying separate rights and privileges so long as they recognized him as King. The Kings that succeeded William however, decided to build a new capital city and named it Westminster. There have been numerous instances of the King and the City’s Mayor at loggerheads with each other. What is peculiar is that laws passed by the British Parliament does not apply to the City of London. However the City of London is not an independent nation like the Vatican. Today the City of London is a one-square mile city. The 2 Londons have separate city halls and elect separate mayors, who collect separate taxes to fund separate police who enforce separate laws. City of London has its own separate flag and crest while London city does not. The Mayor of the City of London has a fancy title ‘The Right Honourable the Lord Mayor of London’ and rides a golden carriage to Guildhall while the Mayor of London wears a suit and takes a bus. The Mayor of London has no power over the Right Honorable Lord Mayor of London (City of London). What’s unique is that the City of London is a Corporation and older than the United Kingdom but has a representative in the UK Parliament through a person known as the ‘Remembrancer’ who is present to protect the ‘City’s interests. The City of London houses Rothschild controlled ‘Bank of England’ Lloyds of London The London Stock Exchange All British Banks The Branch offices of 384 Foreign Banks 70 USA Banks Fleet Streets Newspaper and Publishing Monopolies Headquarters for Worldwide Freemasonry Headquarters for the worldwide money cartel known as ‘THE CROWN’ The City of London is controlled by the Bank of England, a private corporation owned by the Rothschild family after Nathan Rothschild crashed the English stock market in 1812 and took control of the Bank of England. The Queen refers to the City of London Corporation as the ‘Firm’ but it is known as The CROWN (not representing the Royalty of Britain). Buckingham Palace is in London but not in the City of London and the City is not part of England.

Over 400 media workers, including 111 BBC journalists say they have been instructed to support the Israeli genocide – Delivered on the eve of Channel 4’s airing of the documentary Gaza: Doctors Under Attack, which the BBC commissioned but shelved as it said it “risked creating a perception of partiality”, the letter alleges the decision to drop the film “demonstrates, once again, that the BBC is not reporting ‘without fear or favour’ when it comes to Israel”. It also accuses the BBC of being “crippled by the fear of being perceived as critical of the Israeli government” and claims the “inconsistent manner in which guidance is applied draws into focus the role of Gibb, on the BBC Board and BBC’s editorial standards committee” as “we are concerned that an individual with close ties to the Jewish Chronicle … has a say in the BBC’s editorial decisions in any capacity, including the decision not to broadcast Gaza: Medics Under Fire”. Gibb, Theresa May’s former spin doctor and a former head of the BBC’s Westminster political team, led the consortium that bought the Jewish Chronicle in 2020 and, up until August 2024, was a director of Jewish Chronicle Media. The letter, organised by a group of BBC insiders, says: “For many of us, our efforts have been frustrated by opaque decisions made at senior levels of the BBC without discussion or explanation. Our failures impact audiences. “As an organisation we have not offered any significant analysis of the UK government’s involvement in the war on Palestinians. We have failed to report on weapons sales or their legal implications. These stories have instead been broken by the BBC’s competitors.” The statement alleges Gibb has a “conflict of interest” which “highlights a double standard for BBC content makers who have themselves experienced censorship in the name of ‘impartiality’.” It adds: “In some instances staff have been accused of having an agenda because they have posted news articles critical of the Israeli government on their social media. By comparison, Gibb remains in an influential post with little transparency regarding his decisions despite his ideological leanings being well known. We can no longer ask licence fee payers to overlook Gibbs’s ideological allegiances.” The letter concludes: “We, the undersigned BBC staff, freelancers and industry figures are extremely concerned that the BBC’s reporting on Israel and Palestine continues to fall short of the standards our audiences expect. We believe the role of Robbie Gibb, both on the board, and as part of the editorial standards committee, is untenable. We call on the BBC to do better for our audiences and recommit to our values of impartiality, honesty and reporting without fear or favour.” Owing to their fear of repercussions, the 111 BBC journalists signed anonymously.

https://x.com/LMorganEdwards

As an ex-lobbyist herself Lucy explains the Israel Lobby operates in the UK and explains they can simply demand new UK legislation be brought in – – Lucy  on Twitter and Facebook – The Afghan Solution: The Inside Story of Abdul Haq, the CIA and How Western Hubris Lost Afghanistan Lucy Morgan Edwards Published in time for the tenth anniversary of the Afghan war, this explosive book exposes how the West lost its chance to rout the Taliban and stabilise Afghanistan. In late 2001, a group of Afghan tribal leaders met to plan how to topple the Taliban. Within weeks the plan was in tatters, thwarted by the West, and the group’s leader, Abdul Haq, assassinated by the Taliban. Lucy Morgan Edwards’s investigation into Haq’s tragic mission led her to Taliban ministers, warlords, spies and two American Republican brothers who financed Haq’s venture. Based on the author’s own experience of the war in Afghanistan, this book reveals how a solution to the war was lost and why it matters today. A deeply-reported, well-argued and deftly-written account of the opportunities not taken … based on the author’s own deep knowledge of Afghanistan. – Peter Bergen, author of The Longest War: The Enduring War Between America and Al Qaeda A devastating indictment of the intelligence and strategic failures that have led us into the current tragedy in Afghanistan. – William Pfaff This insightful, animated volume … draws on previously unpublished, uniquely qualified Afghan and foreign sources to tell the story of Abdul Haq’s tragic death, the legacy he has left behind, and its applicability to the present and to the future. – Peter Tomsen, author of The Wars of Afghanistan and former US Ambassador to the Afghan resistance 1989-92 Vital reading for everyone who truly wants to understand this tragic conflict. – Peter Oborne, Political Editor, DaTelegraphily Telegraph I was in direct contact with Abdul Haq in the days immediately following 9/11. His tragic story is a microcosm of where we have gone wrong in Afghanistan. – Lord Paddy Ashdown, Liberal Democrat leader 1988 – 1999 By far the best account of Afghanistan during the period that I have read. It combines the pace of a page-gripping thriller with the insights of a piece of travel writing and political journalism at their best. – Conor Foley, author of The Thin Blue Line: How Humanitarianism went to War A timely reminder of the roads not taken and strategic options left unexplored. The cumulative effect constitutes a compelling indictment of state-building through external imposition. This book blends personal insights with a prof-essional detachment and will appeal to the analyst, policymaker, practitioner and, not least, the decision-makers of tomorrow: the students of today. – Dr Graeme Herd, The Geneva Centre for Security Policy

Videos of complete show – Essentials: Michael Hudson | Blackrock/Vanguard | Netanyahu at the 7/7 London Bombings | Tony on Brexit & (4th Reich) Traitors of Arnhem | Evolution | War between God & Lucifer | Plan for three World Wars | Devil Worship: The Rise Of Satanism | Nuclear Armed IDF Doomsday Cult | Aanirfan | Armageddonists I have known: Nick Land (1976-8) | George Monbiot (1995-7) | Manna for the Revelation Generation: CONSPIRACY CLASSICS, longer interviews/lectures

Part Two – International news review, Accelerationist, Armageddonist reports and investigations

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HGN2U2jpinE

MP3 of Friday 27th June 2025 show [right click to download] (from c. 11pm) This week’s full interview mp3s, bottom of page. SHOW STARTS 17:00 London time FOR c. 3½ HRS TO c. 20:30 – OUR LIVE STREAM to Listen live online. Alt. live streams RadioQUK.com, DJ Plug Radio OR Download Show After Transmission HERE. Repeats 11 & 5 AM & PM daily on our stream
Download NOT THE BCFM POLITICS SHOW [ANDROID APP (1)] Alternatives [GITHUB (2)] and [APKPURE (3)] – or the [Apple App store] – PS. You can replace evil Google Play, which banned us, with [the Aurora store]
Only 31% trust the UK Press! – UK media oligopoly TONY’S BOOKS: Bilderberg.org – 2 PAPER–BACKS – TONY’S CHANNELS: Telegram – Bitchute – 911 forum – Radio4All – The Land Is Ours – VK – Twitter/X – Farcebook – Brighteon – Rumble – RT Live on Rumble –  Goebbelsesque YouTube: The Wrong Story; Peter Borenius; Occult Geopolitics & cancelled Public Enquiry

Radio4All mp3 audio files usually available from 23:00 2-4hrs, after TX – we’ll credit you if you rebroadcast. Any probs. mp3s should be on alternative links below by then

Part One – Local and National News Review

Kiwi activist Matt O’Branain joins Tony and Martin. Marianne Spring BBC Verify on health inaccuracies leading to deaths. 3. Down the cancer conspiracy rabbit hole Marianna in Conspiracyland 2 What are cancer patients seeing on social media? The BBC’s social media investigations correspondent Marianna Spring goes down the cancer conspiracy rabbit hole to find out. She returns to the days Paloma spent in hospital after her cancer diagnosis to analyse the advice Paloma was being given by medical staff versus the advice she was receiving from alternative practitioners and her Mum, Kate Shemirani. Marianna investigates Paloma’s mum’s platform as a conspiracy theory influencer and looks at the wider role some social media sites are playing in turbocharging accounts that promote health misinformation. Plus, she speaks to the Vice President of Royal College of Radiologists to understand how harmful content on social media is affecting patients. Host: Marianna Spring Producer: Anna Harris Sound Engineer: Tony Churnside Editor: Sam Bonham Commissioning producer: Nathan Jones Commissioning editor: Rhian Roberts This was a BBC collaboration with Panorama. 

Kate Shemirani’s daughter Paloma, allegedly died of cancer. But was it really a misdiagnosis and medical negligence by paramedics that killed her?  Richie Allen interviews Kate Shemirani as the BBC lays into her as an ‘antivaxxer’. Cambridge grad daughter of notorious anti-vaxxer died of cancer age 23 after refusing treatment when she ‘fell for mum’s conspiracy theories’, brothers claim A Cambridge graduate died of cancer after being indoctrinated by her mother into refusing conventional medical treatment, her siblings claim. Paloma Shemirani died in July last year aged 23 after being diagnosed with non-Hodgkin lymphoma, a form of blood cancer. Miss Brighton finalist Paloma was the daughter of Kate Shemirani, a notorious anti-vaxxer who was struck off the UK’s nursing register in 2021 for her extreme anti-medicine views, including discouraging the use of masks and vaccines. Her brothers, Gabriel and Sebastian, claim their sister ultimately ended up refusing conventional chemotherapy – despite doctors saying it would give her an 80 per cent chance of survival – because of pressure from their mother, with whom she had been trying to build a better relationship. They also allege that their mother sought to isolate her daughter from friends, her boyfriend and other members of her family, even as the cancer’s progression became distressingly clear. Paloma, a Cambridge graduate who was pictured beaming with her two A* and A results after finishing school, had aspired to embark on a career in publishing. But her life was cut tragically short due to, her brothers allege, undue influence from their mother, who rose to notoriety during the coronavirus pandemic. Kate, 60, continues to call herself a ‘natural nurse’ despite being banned from practising nursing in the UK. She made headlines during the pandemic when she used social media to claim Covid vaccines had ‘a tiny bit of Satan’ inside, the jabs caused cancer and contained material harvested from aborted foetuses. She also claimed the Covid virus was linked to the roll-out of 5G technology, and a political tool to gain access to and change people’s DNA. She likened lockdown to the Holocaust and insisted dancing NHS nurses would ‘stand trial for genocide’, while also branding vaccination teams ‘death squads’. She has not commented on her sons’ claims, instead claiming without evidence that the NHS is responsible for her daughter’s death. Speaking to the BBC ahead of a Panorama documentary that airs on Monday night, Gabriel and Sebastian said Paloma had died just seven months after being diagnosed with cancer because of her mother’s extreme views. Sebastian said: ‘My sister has passed away as a direct consequence of my mum’s actions and beliefs and I don’t want anyone else to go through the same pain or loss that I have.’ Kate – who was banned from Twitter but returned when it was rebranded as X under Elon Musk – is said to have briefly worked for the NHS in the 1980s before working as a British Airways air hostess and mode before administering Botox, fillers and peels while bringing up her children. Gabriel and Sebastian are estranged from their mother but Paloma stayed in touch – trying, they felt, to build upon her relationship. Like her mother, she refused to accept a coronavirus vaccination.

Housing crisis is EASILY solvable says RIBA – Kier Starmer ‘here to serve’. Chris Hills on ‘Mixed Tenure Project’ 2006 – flexible tenure for low income households. Reduce cost of delivering social housing by using public land and reinvesting profits, says RIBA report ‘Foundations for the Future: a new delivery model for social housing’ proposes building new homes on publicly-owned sites to help deliver new social housing. It sets out a model to create a pipeline of new social housing, reducing the need for continuous central government funding. It sets out a model to create a pipeline of new social housing, reducing the need for continuous central government funding. It proposes that local authorities in England receive a fixed initial investment from central government in order to: Build new homes on land which is free at the point of use, thereby eliminating or reducing land cost, leaving only construction costs Deliver mixed-tenure developments with both social and market homes Sell the market homes to create an income stream, and reinvest all proceeds to build more homes, making the model almost self-sustaining, according to RIBA analysis The model addresses the urgent need for more social housing, with almost 1.3 million households currently on waiting lists – the highest since 2014. Right to Buy led to the sale of 118,000 social homes between 2012/13 and 2022/23, but only funded 41,000 new social homes over the same period, resulting in a net reduction in social housing stock. Over 30 years, RIBA’s model delivers £2.23 worth of social value for every £1 invested. This accounts for the economic benefits of providing social housing, such as increased employment and improved health and education outcomes. We spend £1.24 billion every year on reducing homelessness in England, including temporary accommodation. The report shows that a one-off investment of the same amount could fund over 20,000 new homes (including over 13,000 social homes) over ten years. RIBA Chair of the Board of Trustees Jack Pringle said: “For most people experiencing housing insecurity, social housing is the only route to an affordable, secure home. The need for social housing is greater than ever, and public sector provision is the only way to build it at the scale required. This model shows how resources can be allocated to help to create a new generation of social homes while minimising other costs, but it’s just one piece of the puzzle. By demonstrating a different approach to housing delivery, we hope to encourage new ways of thinking, either by building on our model or through complementary initiatives. Of course, new homes must be accompanied by the necessary amenities and infrastructure such as schools and public transport to create well-designed places that stand the test of time. To meet the Government’s target of 1.5 million new homes by 2029, we need to think differently – and act now. As architects, we stand ready to tackle this challenge head on; to design and build the next generation of quality homes surrounded by vibrant communities that stand the test of time.”

‘We control all press and politics’  Retiring Bank of England director Harry Pilkington, spills the beans to his nephew in 1972 on a train journey. ‘I’m going to give you two pieces of advice to take through life: Firstly never believe anything you read in the press because we control it. Never, ever believe a politician when they say they can do something because they can’t unless we say they can’. Harry was leaving the Bank of England just as the global banksters were taking it over. Perhaps he sensed as much?

BBC report – Wellcome Trust research on how to build human DNA from scratch. CRISPR technology. Saving lives or money making? Glastonbury Super Spreader Event story. Kneecap playing. Scientists aim to create first artificial human DNA – the risks and benefits Experts share their insights with The i Paper as the UK becomes home to the first major project looking to write human DNA from scratch Britain has become home to the first major investment project looking to write human DNA completely from scratch, attracting both great excitement and grave concern from the scientific community. Scientists already have the ability to read DNA, the building blocks of human beings, and have begun editing genome code to help cure specific diseases. An ambitious new project, however, called SynHG (Synthetic Human Genome) has been given £10m of funding from the world’s largest medical charity, the Wellcome Trust, and will aim to completely synthesise DNA, paving the way for potentially groundbreaking medical therapies. Research in the field has, up until now, been taboo, with campaigners worried about designer babies and unforeseen ethical issues. As the lines between the biological and synthetic world become ever more blurred, The i Paper hears from multiple experts to identify the potential risks and benefits of building completely synthetic DNA. The potential risks Thomas, however, was concerned about the commercialisation of synthesised DNA in the UK. “If these cells are truly synthesised, then the idea would be that [companies] can put a patent on them. If I am given a synthesised heart, though, who owns the heart?” Thomas said. “Am I then giving permission to a company to monitor my heart and biology?” Altering DNA could potentially open the door to creating synthetic embryos – also known as designer babies – biological weapons, so-called “super humans” and “greater ill-health rather than a healthier society”, Thomas said. “AI will almost certainly be used in the design process [of synthetic DNA],” Thomas added. “If AI, which is also in its infancy, is trained on our incomplete understanding of the human genome, are we creating something that could be dangerous? Could it lead to unexpected mutations? Could they be inheritable?” To mitigate against these unknowns, Thomas argued for stronger regulation around DNA building before these possibilities become a reality. She also highlighted the risk of widening health inequalities between the rich and the poor if this new research is used to make more targeted medicines that only wealthier Britons can afford. “There has been a lot of fanfare around the 25th anniversary of the completion of the Human Genome Project, but where is the demand coming from?” continued Thomas. “I wouldn’t think the demand is coming from the average citizen; they would probably prefer resources go towards a fully funded NHS, so they can see their doctor when they want.”

1 year anniversary of Julian Assange being released – campaign to change the guilty plea he had to make. ‘6 Billion Dollar Man’ film, about Assange, coming soon. ‘The Six Billion Dollar Man’ Review: Eugene Jarecki’s Julian Assange Doc Is a Jam-Packed Chronicle of Legal Persecution Unless you followed the ups and downs — well, mostly the downs — of Julian Assange’s life over the past 15 years, you’ll have to wait until the last half-hour of Eugene Jarecki’s new documentary, The Six Billion Dollar Man, to understand what its title means. By that point, the WikiLeaks founder had been holed up for over six years at the Ecuadorian embassy in London, where he faced imminent arrest by the UK authorities. It’s then that we learn how the first Trump administration offered, via the IMF, to loan Ecuador’s government $6.5 billion if they agreed to kick Assange out. The move is not exactly shocking, especially coming from a dealmaker like Trump, and it shows just how much the U.S. authorities were willing to pay so they could nab one of their most wanted men. Much of Jarecki’s jam-packed and informative two-hour feature, which premiered as a special screening in Cannes, focuses on the decade-plus legal rollercoaster ride that Assange and his team of committed lawyers were obliged to take. The film can get a bit repetitive during all those scenes at the embassy, which is not the most cinematic of locations. But we do grasp the sense of confinement and growing paranoia Assange experienced for years on end. Technically he wasn’t in jail, but his life was under house arrest. The first half of The Six Billion Dollar Man gives us some of the backstory leading up to that point, showing how Assange rose from unknown Australian hacker to worldwide hero of free journalism to public enemy number one, especially for the American government. Founded in 2006, his tiny startup WikiLeaks became a phenomenon the next year when Assange released a video called Collateral Murder, unveiling leaked footage of U.S. Marines massacring Iraqi civilians. (Jarecki includes a long excerpt, which is as disturbing now as it was back then.) In the years that followed, the site dumped thousands of redacted documents online, including military field logs, diplomatic communications, and lots of nasty emails between members of the Democratic National Committee. This was a promising time for the internet, when it seemed like online journalism could shake up the world order. “Would you rather not know?” a bearded Edward Snowden explains (presumably from Moscow), referring to all the information Assange was offering up free of charge. But that period would be short-lived, especially when the U.S. struck back against the many compromising documents WikiLeaks was putting out in public. “A fight with the Pentagon only ends one way,” is what one interviewee tells Jarecki, and the rest of the movie shows how our government desperately tried to land Assange behind bars, leaving him no option but to take political asylum in the only place he could get it. Jarecki is no stranger to the abuses of U.S. power, especially in early features like The Trials of Henry Kissinger and Why We Fight that focused on disastrous American foreign policy, from the Vietnam War to the War in Iraq. In the opening sections of his new doc, he does a good job contextualizing the importance of Assange’s work, which aired lots of embarrassing — not to mention criminalizing — dirty laundry under the administrations of both Obama and Trump, neither of whom come off as good guys here.

Starmer warns of war on ‘UK homeland’. Does he mean a migrant fifth column? Chinese paratroops? Or russian beach landings?  UK must prepare for war stance – government document. NATO Summit. Yvette Cooper – highest paid by Israel lobby. NATO Gladio false flag attacks. Kit Klarenberg on Ukraine gay rent boys attacking Starmer’s property. Keir Starmer gives dire verdict on threats UK faces as Brits urged to ‘prepare for war’ Keir Starmer has warned it is a “mistake” to think the only threats Britain faces are far off – saying the British homeland faces danger “on a daily basis”. Asked by The Mirror about an alarming dossier that said Brits must “actively prepare” for war, he voiced his alarm over “sophisticated” attacks on the UK mainland. The Prime Minister announced that security spending will be ramped up dramatically in a “decisive message to aggressors”. He stated: “It is a mistake to think that the only threat we face is external and far off. We do face threats at home all of the time on a daily basis. “There are cyber attacks that have to be dealt with and all being dealt with. They are ever more sophisticated. We need to have the capability to deal with them.” He said that security services have dealt with “many attempts to penetrate our systems”, and added: “The fact that they are very good shouldn’t detract from the fact that that is a real threat to our country.” The PM stated that Europe has made a “fundamental shift in its posture” by ramping up its focus on security in the face of new threats. He said NATO members have agreed to raise spending to 5% within a decade, and vowed that the UK will reach 4.1% by 2027. The Prime Minister said he will oversee the “biggest strengthening” of the UK’s nuclear deterrence in three decades after confirming RAF pilots will get nuke-capable jets. Mr Starmer, speaking at The Hague in the Netherlands, also shot down suggestions that US President Donald Trump is not committed to defending his allies. There has been growing alarm after Trump gave a less-than-convincing response when asked if he would honour Article 5 of the NATO pact – which sets out that an attack on one member is an attack on all. Speaking to reporters in Washington on Tuesday, Trump said it would “depend on” the definition of the clause. But Mr Starmer said the President is a reliable friend to the UK., claiming the relationship between the two nations is “as strong now as it’s ever been”. The PM was seen in deep conversation with the US President during the summit. He praised the US for launching missiles at Iranian nuclear cites. Mr Starmer said: “It has been UK policy for decades that Iran can never be allowed to have a nuclear weapon. “Over the weekend, the US moved to alleviate that threat. Now we need to make sure that the ceasefire holds and seize this opportunity to stabilise the region and get Iran back around the negotiating table with the US…

The King’s Cocaine Dealer Exposed by Daily Mail: Norman Baker former policing minister and David Kelly author has another royal scandal upcoming book: ‘The Royal Mint National Debt’, and ‘And What Do You Do?’ on King Charles’s bad decisions.  Cocaine playboy’s extraordinary friendship with the King: A posh banquet, a private meeting at Clarence House and a luxury watch from Harrods as a gift to Charles, the butler who saw it all reveals the jaw-dropping details He is a brash playboy who has admitted to a rampant cocaine addiction and whose godfather was a notorious ex-crime boss. But despite leading a life of hedonistic excess, James Stunt, the ex-husband of Formula 1 heiress Petra Ecclestone, inveigled his way into the very highest of royal circles. Astonishingly, he was able to forge a close association with the King when he was still Prince of Wales. Perhaps predictably, however, it was a relationship that ended in acute embarrassment when Charles, whom Stunt had loaned a series of supposed masterpiece paintings, was embroiled in an audacious fake art scandal first exposed by this newspaper. Now, in an exclusive interview with The Mail on Sunday, Stunt’s former butler John Gilmour has lifted the lid on how gold bullion dealer Stunt, who also donated £140,000 to the Prince’s charities, was repeatedly welcomed at royal palaces and won the unlikely friendship and affection of the future King. Mr Gilmour, a 54-year-old Canadian, claims: He listened in to a private conversation between his boss and the then-Prince of Wales after Stunt, without telling Charles, put him on speakerphone; Stunt attended a private audience with Charles at Clarence House and a banquet at Buckingham Palace; Michael Fawcett, Charles’s former key aide, was chauffeured around in Stunt’s Rolls-Royce Phantom and regularly visited the tycoon’s Belgravia mansion to view paintings; During one visit, Stunt handed Fawcett a luxury watch from Harrods as a present for Charles; Stunt spent thousands of pounds a week on cocaine and hired prostitutes costing several thousand pounds a night; The tycoon also regularly hosted his godfather Terry Adams, the notorious boss of Britain’s most feared crime family, at his home for Sunday lunch. James Stunt was repeatedly welcomed at royal palaces and won the unlikely friendship and affection of the future King, according to Stunt’s former butler John Gilmour. Pictured with the then-Prince of Wales in Clarence House James Stunt was repeatedly welcomed at royal palaces and won the unlikely friendship and affection of the future King, according to Stunt’s former butler John Gilmour. Pictured with the then-Prince of Wales in Clarence House…

While current masons are excluded from divulging details, ex-members have posted details of the ceremony online. It is based on the legend Hiram Abiff, the builder of the Biblical temple of Solomon, who is attacked by thugs wanting to know the secrets of building. Hiram refuses to tell them and is murdered. This scene is enacted by masons during the initiation. The blindfolded new member has to pledge never to give away the secrets despite being given the “third degree” by his attackers. Charles Mallet report via UK Column owner and editor Mike Robinson, UK Column, on the City of London and Freemasonry. BBC (2018): Secret society and funny handshakes or brotherhood of man? Newsroom City of London: City elects Sheriffs of London for 2025 – 2026 – City of London: The Sheriffs – “City of London Sheriffs play an important role both in supporting the Mayoralty as well as promoting and enhancing the rule of law and links between the City of London Corporation and the judiciary at the Old Bailey.” I keep the Rose and Crown, and Goose and Gridiron in St. Paul’s church-yard; I have known the prisoner from last Tuesday was a fortnight, and no longer; he had been at my house before, as I understood by some of my customers; he appeared decent and very genteel, and said he was private secretary to my Lord Shelburne; I had given him credit from time to time; the first time he came in a coach with a lodger of mine; yesterday fortnight he came, and called me up stairs, and said he would pay me my bill, and wanted me to propose him to be made a free mason, in the society at my house, which is held every first and third Thursday in the month; (he used to tell what passed in the house of Lords.) I went up stairs with him to the next room to the lodge-room, upon the same floor; he asked me to give him two half guineas for a guinea; (it is a general rule to deposit half a guinea when a mason is made) I pulled out my purse, there might be 30 or 40 guineas in it; I put it on the table; the master of the lodge immediately called; the prisoner had given me his guinea; I in a hurry took up part of my money, but I left some upon the table; I can safely say there were five guineas left; I went that moment into the mason’s room, I had not time to take it all up; (I had put it down in order to look out two half guineas for his guinea) I was not absent I believe a minute, nor two I am sure; and when I came back, the prisoner and money was gone; I went down stairs immediately; he was got into the bar, in order to take his great coat, as I apprehend since; (he went then by the name of Thompson) I said, Mr. Thompson, did you take any money off the table; he said, yes, I did take five guineas; I said, what did you take it off the table for; he said, I took it only to secure it, as you was gone; the bell rang again, and I ran up stairs; I don’t suppose I was absent three minutes, and when I came down again, he was gone with his great coat; that night I took some friends with me and pursued him; I understood he used the night houses about Covent-garden; I dare say I spent more than 10 l in looking for him; I had been there every night; I had mentioned him to a gentleman that knew him, and I found he was a person of very bad character; last Saturday night a person came and said, run out, Walker, he is just gone by; I ran out, and found him in an earthen-ware shop, cheapening some things; when he came out of the shop, I laid hold of him, and said, Mr. Thompson, I want to speak with you; said he, I am in a violent hurry now; I said, I must speak with you; I am in a violent hurry, said he again; I said, I take you up as a thief, you stole my money in my house; said he, what, for them few guineas; go with me into Queen-street, Cheapside, and I’ll give you security for your money; I said, no, you shall never be discharged till you come to the Old-Bailey 

Coup attempt in Armenia by arrested Archbishop? – country between Iran and Russia. Armenia arrests prominent archbishop over alleged coup plot Archbishop Bagrat Galstanyan, a leader in protests against the PM, is accused of a plot to overthrow the government. Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan says security officials have thwarted a coup plot involving a leading cleric from Armenia’s national church. The arrest of Archbishop Bagrat Galstanyan, leader of the opposition movement Holy Struggle, on Wednesday marks a sharp escalation in Pashinyan’s standoff with the leadership of the powerful Apostolic Church. The church’s leader, Catholicos Garegin II, has called for Pashinyan’s resignation after Armenia lost a war to Azerbaijan in 2020, while Galstanyan, the primate of the Diocese of Tavush, led mass protests last year, aiming to unseat the prime minister, channelling widespread public anger over military defeats and territorial concessions to Azerbaijan. “Law enforcement officers prevented a large and sinister plan by the ‘criminal-oligarchic clergy’ to destabilize the Republic of Armenia and seize power,” Pashinyan wrote on Facebook on Wednesday, sharing a statement by Armenia’s Investigative Committee. The committee said it had filed criminal charges against Galstanyan and 15 others, who they said had “acquired the means and tools necessary to commit a terrorist attack and seize power”. A total of 14 people had been arrested, investigators said, without naming them. The committee’s statement claimed that Galstanyan — who has previously expressed his desire to replace Pashinyan as prime minister, although he is unable to hold office due to being a dual Armenian-Canadian citizen — sought to overthrow the government with the help of his supporters. It said the group had recruited about 1,000 people, mainly former soldiers and police officers, and divided them into strike groups, assigning each a task to destabilise the country, by blocking roads, inciting violence or blocking the internet. It claimed that the group had acquired weapons, explosives, and other dangerous materials in preparation for the plot. It said searches were under way at the homes of Galstanyan and about 30 of his associates. The committee also published audio recordings purporting to reveal Galstanyan and others discussing plans for the alleged coup plot.

Dodgy Christian involved in US/Israeli GHF getting ‘AID’ into Gaza but genociding hundreds of Gazans who try to get it! – and then Gazans are shot. UN data on Gaza deaths ‘disinformation’, claims head of controversial aid group The UN said at least 410 Palestinians have been killed seeking food since Israel lifted an 11-week aid blockade on 19 May, while the Hamas-run Gaza health ministry said at least 549 people have been killed. ‘Gaza disinformation campaign is deliberate’ The chief of the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) has called figures by the United Nations on people killed at aid hubs “disinformation”. The UN said at least 410 Palestinians have been killed seeking food since Israel lifted an 11-week aid blockade on 19 May, while the Hamas-run Gaza health ministry said at least 549 people have been killed. Johnnie Moore, executive director of GHF, told Sky News there is a “disinformation campaign” that is “meant to shut down our efforts” in the Gaza Strip, fuelled by “some figures” coming out every day. Mr Moore, an evangelical preacher who served as a White House adviser in the first Trump administration, said his aid group has delivered more than 44 million meals to Gazans since it began operations in May. The controversial group, backed by Israel and the United States, has been rejected by the UN and other aid groups, which have refused to cooperate with the GHF. The aid agencies claim Israel is weaponising food, and the new distribution system using the GHF will be ineffective and lead to further displacement of Palestinians. They also argue the GHF will fail to meet local needs and violate humanitarian principles that prohibit a warring party from controlling humanitarian assistance. The GHF is distributing food packages, which they say can feed 5.5 people for 3.5 days, in four locations, with the majority in the far south of Gaza.

Haaretz News – IDF ordered to shoot Gazans collecting food AID. ‘Just Killed, for Nothing’: Israeli Troops Say They Were Ordered to Shoot Aid-Seeking Gaza Civilians “Killing innocent people—it’s been normalized,” said one senior reserve officer. “We were constantly told there are no noncombatants in Gaza, and apparently that message sank in among the troops.” Israel Defense Forces commanders ordered troops to shoot and shell aid-seeking Palestinian civilians in Gaza, even when they posed no threat, according to IDF officers and soldiers interviewed by Israel’s oldest daily newspaper. Haaretz on Friday published testimonies of IDF members including senior officers who said that commanders including Brig. Gen. Yehuda Vach ordered troops to open fire on aid-seeking Palestinians in order to disperse them, even when there was no danger to Israeli troops. Without you, Common Dreams simply wouldn’t exist. In a moment that demands fearless reporting, Common Dreams needs your support to keep our independent journalism alive. “It’s a killing field,” one soldier said. “Where I was stationed, between one and five people were killed every day. They’re treated like a hostile force—no crowd-control measures, no tear gas—just live fire with everything imaginable: heavy machine guns, grenade launchers, mortars. Then, once the center opens, the shooting stops, and they know they can approach. Our form of communication is gunfire.” The soldier said troops informally call this activity “Operation Salted Fish.” Salted fish, or dag maluach in Hebrew, is an Israeli children’s game similar to red light, green light. One IDF reservist who just finished a round of duty in Gaza this week said that “the loss of human life means nothing. It’s not even an ‘unfortunate incident,’ like they used to say.” Last month, the Integrated Food Security Phase Classification report revealed that 244,000 people in Gaza were suffering such “an extreme deprivation of food” that “starvation, death, destitution, and extremely critical levels of acute malnutrition are or will likely be evident.” Gaza officials say at least hundreds of people have already died of malnutrition and lack of medical care since Israel tightened the siege in March. Many of the victims are children and elders. Hundreds of premature infants face imminent death. Amid such desperation—driven by 629 days of U.S.-backed Israeli bombardment, invasion, and ethnic cleansing that have killed, wounded, or disappeared more than 200,000 Palestinians and forcibly displaced over 2 million—Gazans are willing to risk their lives for their next meal. According to Gaza’s Government Media Office, at least 549 Palestinians have been killed and more than 4,000 others have been wounded by IDF troops since May 27 while trying to obtain humanitarian aid amid Israel’s “complete siege” of the Gaza Strip that has fueled mass starvation and illness. Dozens or more civilians have been killed in the worst of these aid massacres. A reserve officer in Vach’s Division 252—veterans of which have accused the general of telling them “there are no innocents in Gaza”—told Haaretz that he was ordered to fire artillery shells toward a crowd gathered near an aid distribution site. “Technically, it’s supposed to be warning fire—either to push people back or stop them from advancing,” he said. “But lately, firing shells has just become standard practice. Every time we fire, there are casualties and deaths, and when someone asks why a shell is necessary, there’s never a good answer. Sometimes, merely asking the question annoys the commanders.” “You know it’s not right. You feel it’s not right—that the commanders here are taking the law into their own hands,” the soldier added. “But Gaza is a parallel universe. You move on quickly. The truth is, most people don’t even stop to think about it.”

Trump in the past, saying he wants to end wars and prevent WW3. US bombing Iran and now ceasefire.  In his own words: Trump’s Iran strike tests his rhetoric on ending wars U.S. President Donald Trump warned that he will not hesitate to strike other targets in Iran if peace does not come quickly in the Middle East. Trump said that while the nuclear facilities struck by the U.S. on Saturday were the most “lethal,” “there are many targets left.” During his campaigns for president, Donald Trump spoke of the need to stop engaging in “endless” or “forever wars,” and said removing “warmongers and America-last globalists” was among his second-term foreign policy priorities. Trump’s move to strike Iranian nuclear sites risks embroiling the United States in the sort of conflict he once derided. Like other recent American presidents, Trump said he would not permit Iran to obtain a nuclear weapon. In recent months, he had held out hope that diplomacy could avoid the strike he announced Saturday. Trump’s consideration of military action had opened a schism among his “Make American Great Again” movement and drew criticism from some of its most high-profile members. Here’s a look at some of Trump’s rhetoric before his announcement Saturday about the strikes: Trump often drew lines of contrasts with his Republican primary opponents. In January 2024, at a New Hampshire rally, he referred to former South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley, who was U.N. ambassador during Trump’s first term, as a “warmonger” whose mentality on foreign policy is, “Let’s kill people all over the place and let’s make a lot of money for those people that make the messes.” During a Jan. 6, 2024, rally before the Iowa caucuses, Trump told supporters that returning him to the White House would allow the country to “turn the page forever on those foolish, stupid days of never-ending wars. They never ended.” Rolling out his foreign policy priorities during that campaign — something Trump’s orbit called “ Agenda 47 ” — he posted a video online in which he talked of how he was “the only president in generations who didn’t start a war.” In that video, Trump called himself “the only president who rejected the catastrophic advice of many of Washington’s Generals, bureaucrats, and the so-called diplomats who only know how to get us into conflict, but they don’t know how to get us out.”

Pre-warning of Trump’s strikes on Iran nuclear facilities – theatre? Photos of trucks leaving Iran nuclear plants Satellite images show trucks lined up at Iran’s Fordow nuclear facility before US airstrikes Satellite images appeared to show scores of trucks lined up at Iran’s Fordow nuclear facility just days before the US carried out its large-scale airstrikes — as speculation swirled that Tehran may have been able to move its uranium stockpiles before the attacks. The images, released by US defense contractor Maxar Technologies, captured more than a dozen cargo-style trucks lined up outside the Fordow nuclear enrichment site’s tunnel entrance on Thursday and Friday. The vehicles, which came and went over a 24-hour stretch, appeared to move unidentified contents roughly half a mile away, the Free Press reported, citing US officials. US and Israeli intelligence officials were aware of the movement at the time but opted not to act so they could track where the trucks headed and await President Trump’s order to carry out the strikes, the officials added. Trump gave the green light to launch 75 precision-guided munitions, including bunker-buster bombs and more than two dozen Tomahawk missiles, against Fordow and two other Iranian nuclear sites early Sunday. Iranian state media outlets have since claimed that the Fordow, Isfahan and Natanz sites were evacuated in the lead up to the strikes. Iran hasn’t officially disclosed how much damage was sustained in the attack but White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt insisted Monday the Trump administration was “confident” that Tehran’s nuclear sites were “completely and totally obliterated.” “We have a high degree of confidence that where those strikes took place is where Iran’s enriched uranium was stored,” she told ABC News. “The president wouldn’t have launched the strikes if we weren’t confident in that.”

Sophie Bolt, CND, on Trump leaving the Iranian nuclear deal, and how US really want regime change in Iran. Israel has nuclear weapons but no inspections. The Samson Option – Israel will nuke Western cities. Why Iran is crucial to a nuclear free Middle East CND Vice-Chair Carol Turner outlines the current situation in regards to discussions on Iran’s nuclear programme. A nuclear weapons free zone across the Middle East will be foundational in ensuring a long-term, stable peace in the region – a goal which seems far away just now. Israel has expanded its military action into Lebanon, Iraq, Syria, Iran, and Houthi-held ports in Yemen, whilst continuing its war on Palestinians in the Occupied Territories. As every CNDer knows, Israel does not admit to having nuclear weapons and has not signed the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT). In the last 18 months, few parliamentarians have even raised the prospect of Israel using them. In contrast, Iran signed the NPT in 1968, ratified it in 1970, and remains a signatory to this day despite ongoing upheavals across the region. Iran is the only other country in the Middle East with the potential to become a nuclear weapons state in the foreseeable future. Its cooperation is essential if any practical steps towards a nuclear weapons free Middle East are to be taken. That’s why the JCPOA, the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action negotiated by Barak Obama during his presidency, was one of the most important – and successful – arms limitation agreements of recent times. It came into effect when UN Security Council Resolution 2231 was adopted on 18 October 2015, and remains in force until 18 October this year – formally speaking if not in reality. In return for some international sanctions being lifted, Iran agreed to: • restrict uranium enrichment; • limit the numbers and types of centrifuges in operation; • cut the size of its of enriched uranium stockpiles; and • permit inspection by the UN’s nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency. Regular IAEA inspections confirmed the agreement was honoured. IAEA reports were accepted by all parties, including US government bodies. Trump was wrong and short sighted to pull out of the JCPOA during his first term. His approach to negotiating a new agreement in his second term shows signs of being just as wrong-headed and short sighted. When the US withdrew in 2018, the US reimposed unilateral sanctions. Britain, France, and Germany (the E3) remain parties to UNSC 2231, but followed the US in slapping national sanctions on Iran – effectively killing the JCPOA. Iran’s approach Throughout, Iran has sought to reopen a nuclear dialogue with the US. The Iranian leadership called for talks during Trump’s election campaign, after his victory, and again when he took office…

Richard Medhurst – sabotage of Iranian nuclear deal. Richard Thomas Medhurst (born 1992) is an independent journalist, political commentator, and analyst from the United Kingdom. His work focuses primarily on international relations, US politics, and the Middle East. Medhurst is known for his coverage of Julian Assange’s extradition case in London, as one of the only journalists to report on the trial of the WikiLeaks founder from inside the court. He has also covered the Iran nuclear deal talks, on the ground in Vienna. His reports and analysis on Yemen, Ukraine, Syria, Niger, Lebanon, Iran, the Israeli occupation in Palestine and the genocide in Gaza have gone viral countless times, racking up millions of views. Medhurst is the son of United Nations peacekeepers who served in various UN missions around the world. His parents were among those awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 1988. Owing to his parents’ professional mobility, he has lived around the globe and speaks four languages fluently: English, Arabic, French, and German. As an independent journalist, Medhurst regularly hosts live broadcasts and video reports on his popular YouTube program. Previous guests include the Foreign Minister of Venezuela, the Dep Foreign Minister of Iran; the Palestinian, Russian and Cuban ambassadors to the United Nations in Vienna; the former British Ambassador to Syria; and various UN officials, journalists, and more. Richard Medhurst has a combined following of roughly one million people online. He has appeared on various international news outlets and platforms such as FOX, Al Jazeera, The Times, Anadolua Agency, LBC, RT, Press TV, WikiLeaks, Black Agenda Report, and more.

Kevin Maguire, Editor of The Mirror, shared by Going Underground – US/UK terrible record of regime change. Operation Ajax – Iran coup 1950s. Iran says Israel was planning false flag attacks in US. 70 years ago, an Anglo-US coup condemned Iran to decades of oppression – but now the people are fighting back The 1953 coup d’etat in Iran ushered in a period of exploitation and oppression that has continued – despite a subsequent revolution that led to huge changes – for 70 years. Each year on August 19, the anniversary of the coup, millions of Iranians ask themselves what would have happened if the US and UK had not conspired all those years ago to overthrow Iran’s democratically elected leader. Iran, the Middle East and, arguably, the whole world may well have been profoundly different. Apart from rewriting the destiny of Iran and its neighbours, the coup paved the way for a series of imperialist interventions and the toppling of democratically elected governments across the global south. Perhaps Washington might have thought twice before plotting coups in Guatemala in 1954, Congo in 1961 or Chile in 1973, if they’d been unable to overthrow Iran’s prime minister, Mohammad Mosaddegh, so easily and profitably. As the democratically elected leader of Iran from 1951 to 1953, Mosaddegh championed nationalisation of Iran’s oil industry. This had previously been in the hands of the Anglo-Persian Oil Company – a British company, founded in 1909 after the discovery of a large oil field in Iran, which would later become BP. Portrait of former Iranian prime minister Mohammad Mosaddegh Iran’s prime minister Mohammad Mosaddegh was overthrown by an Anglo-US coup in 1953. In March 1951, Iran’s parliament voted to proceed with nationalisation. This caused consternation in the west – most notably in Britain, where the prospect of nationalisation was seen as potentially hugely damaging to the economy. Furthermore, it would have undermined Britain’s influence in the Middle East. Plotting to depose Mosaddegh began in earnest. In the event, the coup – named Operation Ajax – was a joint venture between the CIA and MI6. The shah, Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, who had recently fled the country after an earlier plot to remove Mossadegh had failed, returned to Iran. Within a short period, he had tightened his grip on the country’s security services and imposed a dictatorial regime which ruled through brutality and fear. Pahlavi banned all opposition political parties, and many of the activists who participated in the movement for nationalisation of oil were arrested or fled the country. Government by fear In 1957, the shah established an internal security service, Sazman-e Ettel’at va Amniyat-e Keshvar (Savak), which essentially ran Iran at the shah’s bidding. From then until 1975, only two major political parties were allowed to operate, the People’s Party (?ezb-e Mardom) and the New Iran Party (?ezb-e Iran-e Novin), and all parliamentary candidates had to be approved by Savak. Both parties in reality were wholly under the shah’s control. The parliament only existed to rubber-stamp his decisions, as did the prime minister – who the shah appointed. In 1975, the shah took his domination of Iranian politics further, establishing a single party, the Party of Resurrection of the Iranian Nation (Hezb-e Rastakhiz), which all Iranians were obliged to join. By 1979, when Iran rose up in a popular revolution, it was a virtual absolute monarchy, with the shah’s will enforced by the dreaded Savak secret police.

Lots of damage to Iranian nuclear plants or not? Maybe not! Does Trump know or care? Trump – 12 Day War? Alistair Crooks, ex MI6, on information blackout on how much damage Iranian attacks did to Israel. Trump has gone all out in the Americans absolutely obliterated Fordow the whole program these three strikes have completely absolute success brilliant work by the air force the American air force I mean that’s the end of the program uh and he sort of he was even hinting now is the time for Iran to to surrender and write you know we’ll we’ll have a meeting and you can write your salon a surrender document and um this is a narrative which really actually is doesn’t seem to be working very well today trump has doubled down on it in the most bizarre way he says “Ah the Israelis tell me they’ve sent their people they’ve sent people to Fordo um and have been in Foro and have confirmed that um it is um completely destroyed i I just you know I can’t believe that he you know his team allows him to say such nonsense you know I I I know that I’ve been to K in fact is quite close to K it’s very adjacent i mean I know what that area is like you don’t have you know MOSAD agents wandering around just going into nuclear installations like Fordo which is remote and at you know in a mountain and the entrances to it you have to go down and down and down and down to get into to the um to the um enrichment chambers i I mean it’s just you know ridiculous i don’t know why they allow him to say such exaggerated things because it just you know it just undermines everything so what does this mean well what it means is something important for Iran i listened by the way to the Supreme Leader’s um address on I think it was a few days earlier that he did to a huge gathering of Iranians and it was translated by AI as I don’t understand it it was the most impressive address a a very clear statement of Iran where it is what it is um very articulate short to the point and the effect on people was was really dramatic but he was very clear no surrender he said “We will continue with enrichment.” What right has the United States to say anything to us about our proposal what right have they unprovoked illegally to attack uh the state and he said we will continue with enrichment we will continue with it because we need it for many things many different um projects that uh we we’re engaged it was a very powerful speech and if you haven’t seen it you should and it had a huge impact on the audience you you you could see it but where are we so therefore what we have at the end of this theater because quite clearly this was theater the Iranians were informed they let it happen they allowed it to bomb they’ve let they’ve said nothing um beyond um they’ve the United States and Israel say it was huge victory we’ve destroyed the nuclear enrichment program etc etc and the reality is rather different.

Netanyahu on US bombing Iran nuclear plants. Why did Israel fund Hamas up until October 7th? Why Israel’s Netanyahu encouraged suitcases of cash for Gaza – Benjamin Netanyahu and his allies say he was trying to prevent a humanitarian disaster in the Gaza Strip. Netanyahu’s critics, citing his own words, say he was trying to buy — and thwart — peace. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu “not only tolerated” years of monthly cash payments from Qatar to the Gaza Strip, up until Hamas attacked Israel on Oct. 7, “he had encouraged them,” The New York Times reported Sunday. The payments, which Israel knew “helped prop up the Hamas government” in Gaza, continued even as the Israeli military obtained detailed battle plans for a Hamas invasion and observed “significant terrorism exercises” in the Palestinian enclave, the Times reported. For years, “Israeli intelligence officers even escorted a Qatari official into Gaza, where he doled out money from suitcases filled with millions of dollars.” The cash payments have been an open secret in Israel — as Last Week Tonight’s John Oliver discussed in the second half of a November look at the symbiosis between Hamas and Netanyahu. Through interviews with more than two dozen officials in Israel, the U.S., Qatar other Middle Eastern governments, the Times “unearthed new details” about the Gaza payments and the steps Netanyahu took to “keep the money flowing” despite the controversies it sparked in his governments. Allowing the billions of dollars in payments, the Times reported, was a “gamble” by Netanyahu that a “steady flow of money would maintain peace in Gaza” and “keep Hamas focused on governing, not fighting.” Netanyahu’s critics say he wasn’t just trying to “buy quiet” from Hamas but also prop it up to weaken the internationally recognized Palestinian Authority, which governs in the West Bank, as a means to thwart talks on Palestinian statehood. Netanyahu told Politico in late November that the payments were “to avoid a civilian humanitarian collapse” in Gaza, and the idea he wanted to build up Hamas is “ridiculous” and “a big lie.” But he has been talking about keeping Hamas strong to weaken the Palestinian Authority and lessen pressure to negotiate a two-state peace since at least 2012, publicly and in private, the Times reported. At a 2019 Likud party conference, Politico noted, Netanyahu said, “Anyone who wants to prevent the establishment of a Palestinian state needs to support strengthening Hamas.”

‘The Bibi Files’ documentary (2024) – IF YOU CAN’T AFFORD TO PAY: THREE WAYS (1) TO WATCH (2) FOR FREE (3) – Sara Netanyahu’s influence over her husband. THE BIBI FILES Using never-seen-before interrogation footage, this investigation of Benjamin Netanyahu, his wife Sara, and his inner circle, provides an unflinching gaze into the private world behind the headlines. Petty vanity and a sense of entitlement leads to corruption, and the unwillingness of the Netanyahus to give up power. The extreme right senses opportunity in Bibi’s weakness, and the dominos fall. WHY CANT THE BB EFFING C SHOW IT?!?! ‘The Bibi Files’: Documentary reveals the police interrogations behind Netanyahu’s graft trial FRANCE 24 reviews “The Bibi Files”, a new documentary by filmmakers Alexis Bloom and Alex Gibney, which features never-before-seen footage of Israeli police interrogating Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu, his family and his inner circle on corruption allegations. The documentary was screened as a work-in-progress at the 2024 Toronto Film Festival on Monday, hours after a Jerusalem court rejected a petition by Netanyahu to block the screening. Binyamin Netanyahu reaches for a glass of water on the table. He looks relaxed, slouching slightly in his suit and tie, a large map of the Middle East on the wall behind him enhancing the power and prestige of his position as Israeli prime minister. “Did you ask for it?” questions an unseen police interrogator. Netanyahu sips the water. “For what?” The prime minister is so nonchalant, he has to be reminded of the topic of discussion during a police investigation. “A bag,” he’s patiently reminded. Another sip. “Perhaps. I don’t remember.” “And if we told you that you did?” “So I asked, so what?” The object of Netanyahu’s scorn is an opaque bag that the prime minister is alleged to have requested to conceal a box of Cohiba cigars, priced at around $1,100, that he received from an Israeli billionaire. It’s one of many cartons of cigars – code-named “green leaves” by Netanyahu’s staff – and champagne bottles – dubbed “pinks” – that the prime minister and his wife, Sara Netanyahu, are alleged to have received from their wealthy Israeli “friends”. The scene unfolds in a new documentary, “The Bibi Files”, featuring never-before-seen footage of the Israeli police interrogations that led to Netanyahu’s indictment in November 2019 on corruption charges. The film from Alexis Bloom and Alex Gibney gets its first screenings, as a work-in-progress, on September 9 and 10 at the 2024 Toronto Film Festival. It was shown at the festival on Monday just hours after a Jerusalem court rejected a petition by Netanyahu to block the screening. Over the course of two gripping hours, “The Bibi Files” unveils leaked footage of the police questioning Netanyahu and his family, friends and staff, as well as a former Israeli finance minister. A lineup of experts, including former top Israeli officials, weaves together scenes of human greed and moral compromise into a comprehensible chronicle. How has a steady drip of expensive cigars, champagne and diamond-encrusted bracelets contributed to the current state of the Middle East? Do the luxury objects, code-named and hidden in bags, have any bearing on Gazans, dying, displaced and desperate after nearly a year of Israeli bombardments? Can they be linked to the anguish of Israeli families still missing loved ones who were abducted during the October 7 Hamas attack and taken to Gaza? “The Bibi Files” connects the dots, offering up pieces of the puzzle, examining them and fitting them into the Middle East’s political jigsaw. The result is an almost Shakespearean tale of the corruption of one man and how it can infect the body politic of a nation at war, once again, against a people with no country.

Matt O’Branain Twitter – Matt O’Branain Face-spook – https://x.com/MattOBranain – https://www.facebook.com/mattobran

Jonathan Cook article – Western mainstream press may be accused of war crimes. Nosta protocol. Tik Tok deals. Follow Matt on X.  Why BBC editors must one day stand trial for colluding in Israel’s genocide – 20 June 2025 , In a confrontation with BBC news chief Richard Burgess, journalist Peter Oborne sets out six ways the state broadcaster has wilfully misled audiences on Israel’s destruction of Gaza  1. THE BBC HAS NEVER MENTIONED THE HANNIBAL DIRECTIVE, invoked by Israel on 7 October 2023, that green-lit the murder of Israeli soldiers and civilians, often by Apache helicopter fire, to prevent them being taken captive by Hamas. The Israeli media has extensively reported on the role of the Hannibal directive in the Israeli military’s response on 7 October, but that coverage has been completely ignored by the BBC and most UK media outlets. 2. THE BBC HAS NEVER MENTIONED ISRAEL’S DAHIYA DOCTRINE, the basis of its “mowing the lawn” approach to Gaza over the past two decades, in which the Israeli military has intermittently destroyed large swaths of the tiny enclave. The official aim has been to push the population, in the words of Israeli generals, back to the “Stone Age”. The assumption is that, forced into survival mode, Palestinians will not have the energy or will to resist their brutal and illegal subjugation by Israel and that it will be easier for Israel to ethnically cleanse them from their homeland. 3. THE BBC HAS UTTERLY FAILED TO REPORT the many dozens of genocidal statements from Israeli officials since 7 October – again vital context for audiences to understand Israel’s goals in Gaza. Perhaps most egregiously, the BBC has not reported Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s biblically-inspired comparison of the Palestinians to “Amalek” – a people the Jews were instructed by God to wipe from the face of the earth. Netanyahu knew this clearly genocidal statement would have especial resonance with what now amounts to a majority of the combat soldiers in Gaza who belong to extreme religious communities that view the Bible as the literal truth. 4. By contrast, as Oborne notes, on more than 100 occasions when guests have tried to refer to what is happening in GAZA AS A GENOCIDE, BBC STAFF HAVE IMMEDIATELY SHUT THEM DOWN ON AIR. As other investigations have shown, the BBC has strictly enforced a policy not only of banning the use of the term “genocide” by its own journalists in reference to Gaza but of depriving others – from Palestinians to western medical volunteers and international law experts – of the right to use the term as well. Again, this is pure genocide denial. 5. OBORNE ALSO POINTS TO THE FACT that the BBC has largely ignored Israel’s campaign of murdering Palestinian journalists in Gaza. A greater number have been killed by Israel in its war on the tiny enclave than the total number of journalists killed in all other major conflicts of the past 160 years combined.

Videos of complete show – Essentials: Michael Hudson | Blackrock/Vanguard | Netanyahu at the 7/7 London Bombings | Tony on Brexit & (4th Reich) Traitors of Arnhem | Evolution | War between God & Lucifer | Plan for three World Wars | Devil Worship: The Rise Of Satanism | Nuclear Armed IDF Doomsday Cult | Aanirfan | Armageddonists I have known: Nick Land (1976-8) | George Monbiot (1995-7) | Manna for the Revelation Generation: CONSPIRACY CLASSICS, longer interviews/lectures

Part Two – International news review, Accelerationist, Armageddonist reports and investigations

MP3 of Friday 20th June 2025 show [right click to download] (from c. 11pm) This week’s full interview mp3s, bottom of page. SHOW STARTS 17:00 London time FOR c. 3½ HRS TO c. 20:30 – OUR LIVE STREAM to Listen live online. Alt. live streams RadioQUK.com, DJ Plug Radio OR Download Show After Transmission HERE. Repeats 11 & 5 AM & PM daily on our stream
Download NOT THE BCFM POLITICS SHOW [ANDROID APP (1)] Alternatives [GITHUB (2)] and [APKPURE (3)] – or the [Apple App store] – PS. You can replace evil Google Play, which banned us, with [the Aurora store]
Only 31% trust the UK Press! – UK media oligopoly TONY’S BOOKS: Bilderberg.org – 2 PAPER–BACKS – TONY’S CHANNELS: Telegram – Bitchute – 911 forum – Radio4All – The Land Is Ours – VK – Twitter/X – Farcebook – Brighteon – Rumble – RT Live on Rumble –  Goebbelsesque YouTube: The Wrong Story; Peter Borenius; Occult Geopolitics & cancelled Public Enquiry

Radio4All mp3 audio files usually available from 23:00 2-4hrs, after TX – we’ll credit you if you rebroadcast. Any probs. mp3s should be on alternative links below by then

Part One – Local and National News Review

Tel-Aviv finally gets eye-for-an-eye blowback, payback, justice… for its genocide in Gaza. Israel keep casualties and damage top secret in Iran retaliation strikes.  IRAN SMASHES MISSILE BARRAGE INTO STRATEGIC TARGETS INCLUDING MICROSOFT HQ IN TEL-AVIV War in middle east. Somalia war. Press TV – protest against Israel attacking Iran in London. Escalation to nuclear war? Regime change wanted in Iran. West always on Israel’s side. Netanyahu saving his own skin. Al Jazeera – Israel has lots of nuclear weapons. ‘Significant damage’ after IDF headquarters hit by Iranian missile attack as Islamic Republic launches barrage of missiles at Tel Aviv Israel’s military headquarters were struck after Iran’s Islamic Republic unleashed a barrage of missiles on central Tel Aviv late Friday night, causing “significant damage” to the Jewish state’s equivalent of the Pentagon. Alarming footage shared on social media — and verified by The New York Times — showed a strike slamming into an area that houses several military sites, including the Israel Defense Forces’ main command center. The dramatic clips captured interceptor missiles firing into the sky moments before a blinding flash, a thunderous boom, and the explosion of an incoming warhead. The videos suggest that at least one Iranian missile breached Israel’s air defenses and hit a sensitive command site in the heart of Tel Aviv. “This is Israel’s version of the Pentagon, the Kiryat, and the building on this compound was just hit,” according to Fox News chief foreign correspondent Trey Yingst, who was at the scene. Iran orders closure of Strait of Hormuz — putting one-fifth of world’s oil supply at risk First satellite images of Fordow after US bunker buster bomb strike show extensive damage Moscow warned Sunday that several nations were prepared to supply Tehran with nuclear weapons as Russia and China condemned America’s attack on Iran’s nuclear facilities. Kremlin warns that other nations ready to give Iran nukes: ‘Dangerous escalation has begun’ “There is significant damage.” Yingst, who was forced to run for cover as a “massive amount” of Iranian missiles rained down earlier, said that the country also used around 150 ballistic missiles to target residential areas and military installations around Tel Aviv. “These ballistic missiles make the rockets that were being fired from Gaza look like toys,” he added. The IDF has not confirmed whether its headquarters were hit, but released raw footage showing Iran firing off waves of ballistic missiles at the Jewish state for hours on Friday. “The IDF cannot, and will not, allow Iran to attack our civilians,” the military agency posted on X. Israel launched large-scale airstrikes against Iran Friday aimed at obliterating Iranian nuclear and military facilities, as well as a swath of top military commanders. The surprise attack killed at least 20 senior Iranian commanders, sources said, including the head of its Revolutionary Guard.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vfcvKJGRHKE

BBC Verify report – no evidence for Iran developing nuclear weapons. Iran war similarities to Iraq war – regime change. Robin Cook giving reasons against Iraq war. BBC PM – former cabinet minister Clare Short on how UK/US shouldn’t get involved in Iran war. Is Iran close to having nuclear weapons? | BBC News BBC News, BBC Verify Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has long warned that Iran is close to developing nuclear weapons. After Israel launched attacks on Iran last week, Netanyahu said Iran could produce a bomb within months. Israel’s military says it targeted nuclear sites including the “inactive” Arak heavy water reactor and Natanz facility and have it sights set on the Fordo nuclear facility. Tehran has insisted its nuclear programme is only for civilian purposes. BBC Verify’s Ros Atkins explains what we know about Iran’s nuclear programme. Ros Atkins on… How close is Iran to a nuclear weapon? Israel’s Prime Minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, has long warned that Iran is close to developing nuclear weapons. BBC Verify’s Ros Atkins explains what we know about Iran’s nuclear programme. Produced by Aisha Sembhi. Additional reporting by Thomas Spencer and Kayleen Devlin. Graphics by Mark Edwards..

IAEA Head: “We Did Not Have Any Proof” of Iran Building Nuclear Weapon “We did not have any proof of a systematic effort to move into a nuclear weapon,” IAEA’s Rafael Grossi said. The head of the leading intergovernmental watchdog for nuclear energy and atomic weapons has confirmed that the agency has not found “any proof” of an effort to obtain a nuclear weapon by Iran, lending yet more evidence contradicting Israel’s “self-defense” narrative for its war on the country. In an interview this week, International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Director General Rafael Grossi said that, while it is possible that there are operations being kept secret from regulators, reports that Iran has not been actively pursuing a nuclear weapon since 2003 are accurate. Those claiming to know exact details about Iran moving toward a nuclear weapon are engaging in “speculation,” he told CNN’s Christiane Amanpour. “If there was some activity which was clandestine or hidden or away from our inspectors, we couldn’t know,” said Grossi. What the agency has reported, he said, is that “we did not have — as in coincidence with some of the sources you mentioned there — that we did not have any proof of a systematic effort to move into a nuclear weapon.” This undercuts Israel’s claims that it has evidence that Iran is working to obtain a nuclear bomb. Israeli officials say they’re so sure of this that they have started a war supposedly in order to stop it from happening. These claims aren’t backed up by any other sources. As Tulsi Gabbard, the top intelligence official in President Donald Trump’s administration, has testified, U.S. intelligence officials have not found evidence of Iran moving toward a nuclear weapon. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has suggested that Iran is actually pursuing a nuclear weapon in “secret”. But a lack of proof of a claim is hardly a legitimate reason to begin a war. Grossi’s clear reiteration of IAEA’s findings are significant as Netanyahu and pro-Israel lawmakers in the U.S. have used IAEA’s findings in order to justify the war, misleadingly using the agency’s reports as evidence of Iran working toward a nuclear bomb even as the agency has definitively said it has no evidence of that. For its part, Iran has long insisted that its nuclear development is for civilian purposes. IAEA has, indeed, found evidence that Iran possesses some of the elements needed for a nuclear bomb, but has emphasized that it has not found evidence for active bomb development.

Tucker Carlson interviews ‘top’ Israel lobbyist and Christian Zionist Ted Cruz – on Trump’s policies on Iran, and suprises the audience with how little Ted Cruz knows about Iran. Regime change mantra.

LowKey on Iran’s fight against Western imperialism. Iran’s Missiles RAIN HELL on Tel Aviv, US War IMMINENT w/ Prof. Mohammad Marandi, Lowkey & Ali Abunimah Danny Haiphong – Israel’s strike on Iran has led to a massive retaliation, Operation True Promise 3, which now has Trump scrambling to war. Mohammad Marandi, Lowkey, and Ali Abunimah join the show for a break down of what’s happening to the US-backed colony and the consequences the coming collapse of Israel is having on the region and the world.

Tulsi Gabbard saying evidence indicates there is no Iran nuclear weapons plan. Tulsi Gabbard Says Iran Not Believed To Be Building A Nuclear Weapon – The United States intelligence community has assessed that Iran is not currently building a nuclear weapon, according to Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard.  America’s spies say Iran wasn’t building a nuclear weapon. Trump dismisses that assessment WASHINGTON (AP) — Tulsi Gabbard left no doubt when she testified to Congress about Iran’s nuclear program earlier this year. The country was not building a nuclear weapon, the national intelligence director told lawmakers, and its supreme leader had not reauthorized the dormant program even though it had enriched uranium to higher levels. But President Donald Trump dismissed the assessment of U.S. spy agencies during an overnight flight back to Washington as he cut short his trip to the Group of Seven summit to focus on the escalating conflict between Israel and Iran. “I don’t care what she said,” Trump told reporters. In his view, Iran was “very close” to having a nuclear bomb. Trump’s statement aligned him with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who has described a nuclear-armed Iran as an imminent threat, rather than with his own top intelligence adviser. Trump was expected to meet with national security officials in the Situation Room on Tuesday as he plans next steps. Gabbard brushed off the inconsistency, blaming the media for misconstruing her earlier testimony and asserting that “President Trump was saying the same thing that I said.” “We are on the same page,” she told CNN. Asked for comment, Gabbard’s office referred to those remarks. In her March testimony to lawmakers, Gabbard said the intelligence community “continues to assess that Iran is not building a nuclear weapon and Supreme Leader Khamenei has not authorized the nuclear weapons program he suspended in 2003.” She also said the U.S. was closely monitoring Iran’s nuclear program, noting that the country’s “enriched uranium stockpile is at its highest levels and is unprecedented for a state without nuclear weapons.” Trump’s contradiction of Gabbard echoed his feuds with U.S. spy leaders during his first term, when he viewed them as part of a “deep state” that was undermining his agenda. Most notably, he sided with Russian President Vladimir Putin in 2018 when asked if Moscow had interfered in the 2016 election, saying Putin was “extremely strong and powerful in his denial.” The latest break over Iran was striking because Trump has staffed his second administration with loyalists rather than establishment figures. Gabbard, a military veteran and former Democratic congresswoman from Hawaii, was narrowly confirmed by the Republican-controlled Senate because of her scant experience with intelligence or managing sprawling organizations. Gabbard, who left the Democratic Party in 2022 and endorsed Trump in last year’s election, is expected to testify Tuesday in a closed session on Capitol Hill, along with CIA Director John Ratcliffe, during a previously scheduled budget hearing. Both officials likely would face questions about their views on Iran and Trump’s latest statements. A representative for the CIA did not immediately respond to requests for comment. The head of the International Atomic Energy Agency has repeatedly warned that Iran has enough enriched uranium to make several nuclear bombs should it choose to do so. Iran maintains its nuclear program is peaceful.

Richard Visick, Chairman of Reform UK in Bristol, joins Tony and Martin. Discussion around social policies, finance, the City of London, Brexit, the ‘uniparty’ of Tory and Labour, assisted dying, abortion, reopening South Wales steel works and coal mines, how to pay for that, nationalisation of infrastructure, reform of local government, migration both legal and illegal as well as look at foreign policy, does reform support wars against Russia and Iran? Reform gains. Richard is a lawyer. Why he joined Reform. Human Rights law. EU. Reform on assisted dying bill. Abortion legal up to birth now. Migration – illegal and visas. Vans on Downs. House prices. US deferred assets of bonds. Our Contract with You Britain Needs Reform and Reform UK Needs You Britain has so much potential. Our country is full of talent and energy. Brexit is the opportunity of a lifetime. The challenges we face are vast. Both Labour and Tory governments have broken promise after promise. They have destroyed trust in our democracy and betrayed the British people. Our country is worse off, both financially and culturally. The economy is being wrecked by record high taxes, record high national debt, wasteful government spending and nanny state regulations. Record mass immigration has damaged our country. The small boats crisis threatens our security. Multiculturalism has imported separate communities that reject our way of life. Divisive, ‘woke’ ideology has captured our public institutions. Transgender indoctrination is causing irreversible harm to children. The unprecedented population explosion has pushed Britain to breaking point. There’s a housing crisis. A benefits crisis. Record crime. Record NHS waiting lists. Wages are stagnating. Net Zero has sent energy costs soaring. It is making us poorer and colder, damaging British industry and forcing drivers off the road. The Tories have broken Britain. Labour will bankrupt Britain. A vote for either is a vote for more incompetence, dishonesty and defeat. The two-party system has failed. We are ruled by an out-of-touch political class who have turned their backs on our country. But there is an alternative. The British people now have a common sense choice in Reform UK. Our Contract with You is a serious plan to reshape the way our country is run. The government must work for the British people. Not against them. Only Reform UK will stand up for British culture, identity and values. We will freeze immigration and stop the boats. Restore law and order. Repair our broken public services. Cut taxes to make work pay. End government waste and deliver our fully funded plan for zero NHS waiting lists. We will unlock Britain’s vast energy treasure of oil and gas to slash energy bills, beat the cost-of-living crisis and unleash real economic growth. Once and for all, we will take back control over our borders, our money and our laws. Only Reform UK will secure Britain’s future as a free, proud and independent sovereign nation. Nigel Farage Leader, Reform UK

Reform UK would win if general election held tomorrow, poll suggests Ipsos survey finds Nigel Farage’s party has a nine-point lead over Labour Reform UK has taken a dramatic nine-point lead over Labour, a new poll has revealed. The Ipsos survey showed Reform had 34 per cent of the vote share, compared to Labour’s 25 per cent. This means that if a general election were held tomorrow, Reform’s leader Nigel Farage would probably be elected prime minister. Meanwhile, the Conservatives had only 15 per cent of the estimated vote share in the lowest result ever recorded by Ipsos, and the highest ever for Reform. The figures from the polling of 1,180 people show Labour’s plunging popularity, after winning the 2024 general election with the biggest majority since Tony Blair. Only 19 per cent say they are satisfied with the work he is doing, while 73 per cent were dissatisfied, according to the poll. The figures showed that 54 per cent of Labour voters and 48 per cent of Tory voters have changed their support, with a high proportion of defectors from both going to Reform. If that played out, there would be just 10 Conservative seats while Labour would be reduced from 403 to 140. Gideon Skinner, senior director of UK politics at Ipsos, said: “The disappointment with Labour is clear, even among those who voted for the party in 2024. We know from Ipsos research how difficult it has been to shift entrenched public pessimism over the cost of living, immigration, and the state of public services. “So far, Britons do not think Labour is delivering the tangible change they were hoping for in 2024.” Earlier this month, Reform was hit with chaos after the man brought in by Nigel Farage to professionalise the party quit following a row with their newest MP. Zia Yusuf, a Muslim businessman, described new Runcorn MP Sarah Pochin as “dumb” after she challenged Sir Keir Starmer over the legality of women wearing the burqa in the UK during Prime Minister’s Questions. After fury broke out about his comment, Mr Yusuf, who had been the target of anger by many activists over several months, announced his resignation. He returned to the party in a new role two days later.

Reform UK calls for Thames Water to be renationalised – Populist party’s deputy leader says heavily indebted utility should ‘be put out of its misery’ Steve Hall on Farage, banking and the economy. Adam Curtis’s new series Shifty – deindustrialisation to finance under Thatcher. How Reform would deal with the economy. Steve Hall – Modern Monetary Theory. Thames Water failing. Reform policies on British steelworks, utilities, rail. Reform foreign policy – Israel/Gaza/Iran war – Ukraine/Russia war. Reform Bristol meet up twice a month. Reform UK calls for Thames Water to be renationalised – Populist party’s deputy leader says heavily indebted utility should ‘be put out of its misery’ Thames Water should be “put out of its misery” and renationalised, according to the deputy leader of Reform UK, in a sign that the backlash against water privatisation has become an increasingly populist issue. Richard Tice told the Financial Times that the situation at the heavily indebted UK utility was “completely untenable” and that City financiers were trying to “rip off consumers even more” with high interest loans and millions in fees. “It is essentially bust, capital projects are being delayed and it should be put out of its misery now,” he said. “There has to be moral hazard. Let it go into special administration for £1 and reorganise it to the benefit of taxpayers and consumers.” The comments by the deputy leader of the rightwing populist party came days after Thames Water — which provides water and sewerage services for 16mn households but is struggling under a £19bn debt mountain — warned that it risked running out of cash in the new year. Unless it can obtain a £3bn loan from creditors, Britain’s largest privatised water utility risks being temporarily renationalised under the government’s special administration procedure. The two-and-a-half year loan on offer from creditors, which requires approval in court next week, comes at a 9.75 per cent interest rate, with fees taking the real interest cost much higher. Reform’s call for renationalisation reflects a shift by populist parties around the world to focus on what they see as the extractive vices of global capitalism, including private equity investors, and their call for policies that have historically been more aligned with the left. In Hungary, Viktor Orbán’s Fidesz party has reversed unpopular and costly water privatisations in Pécs and Budapest. In the US, meanwhile, vice-president elect JD Vance has called for more unionisation of workers in the private sector to protect jobs and drive up wages. The UK Labour government has said it favours a private-sector solution to the crisis at Thames over special administration, under which the state temporarily takes control of a company to ensure it remains in operation. This is in part because it is concerned that if Thames Water enters the special administration regime, leftwing MPs inside the governing party will call for all water companies to be permanently renationalised. In response to a growing public outcry over executive pay and sewage discharges, the UK Green party has called for public ownership of all water companies. The Liberal Democrats, Britain’s third-biggest party, has said Thames Water should be brought under special administration.

Videos of complete show – Essentials: Michael Hudson | Blackrock/Vanguard | Netanyahu at the 7/7 London Bombings | Tony on Brexit & (4th Reich) Traitors of Arnhem | Evolution | War between God & Lucifer | Plan for three World Wars | Devil Worship: The Rise Of Satanism | Nuclear Armed IDF Doomsday Cult | Aanirfan | Armageddonists I have known: Nick Land (1976-8) | George Monbiot (1995-7) | Manna for the Revelation Generation: CONSPIRACY CLASSICS, longer interviews/lectures

Part Two – International news review, Accelerationist, Armageddonist reports and investigations