Author: Tony Gosling

MP3 of Friday 21st March 2026 show [right click to download] (from c. 11pm) This week’s full interview mp3s, bottom of page. SHOW STARTS 17:00 London time FOR c. 3½ HRS TO c. 20:30 – OUR LIVE STREAM to Listen live online. Alt. live stream, DJ Plug Radio OR Download Show After Transmission HERE. Repeats 11 & 5 AM & PM daily on our stream
Download NOT THE BCFM POLITICS SHOW APP [ANDROID APP (1)] Alternatives [GITHUB (2)] and [APKPURE (3)] – or the [Apple App store] – PS. You can replace evil Google Play, which banned us, with [the Aurora store]
Only 31% trust the UK Press! – UK media oligopoly TONY’S BOOKS: Bilderberg.org – 2 PAPER–BACKS – TONY’S CHANNELS: Telegram – Bitchute – 911 forum – Radio4All – The Land Is Ours – VK – Twitter/X – Farcebook – Brighteon – Rumble – RT Live on Rumble –  Goebbelsesque YouTube: This show; Public Enquiry; Peter Borenius; i-Contact & Occult Geopolitics

Radio4All mp3 audio files usually available from 23:00 2-4hrs, after TX – we’ll credit you if you rebroadcast. Any probs. mp3s should be on alternative links below by then

Part One – Local and National News Review

Scouse Oracle looks at Peter Mandelson’s UK Palantir contracts in the police which are just under the amount which requires scrutiny. A £489k Palantir ‘trial’ and what it means for UK policing. The Scouse Oracle This award appears in public procurement mirrors as a 2026 Phase 1 Unified Data Platform contract between the Met Police and Palantir — worth ~£490k under G-Cloud 14. Bidstats G-Cloud 14 is a procurement framework run by the Crown Commercial Service — see crowncommercial.gov.uk/agreements/RM1557.14.” An analysis of a recent Metropolitan Police contract reveals how small technology trials quietly build foundational infrastructure. This examination explores the procurement frameworks allowing these systems to integrate into public services without widespread debate.

Protest about luxury housing built on former Bristol Zoo site. Activists rally over Bristol Zoo Gardens sale The proposed sale of the former Bristol Zoo Gardens site is “a scandal happening in plain sight”, according to campaigners who protested outside the offices of the developer set to purchase the land. Acorn Property Group has denied claims linking its planned development of the Clifton site to an official warning notice from the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), saying it relates to a separate part of the business and does not affect the deal for the zoo site. Justin Morris, chief executive of Bristol Zoological Society, said the notice “has no bearing on the sale”. In a statement, Morris described the redevelopment of the historic land as an opportunity to open the gardens to the public for the first time and fund the charity’s conservation and education work. Around 50 people gathered outside the company’s Clifton Down Road offices on Wednesday afternoon to oppose the sale and plans which include nearly 200 homes, a cafe, a playground and free public access to the gardens. Acorn Property Group said it closed its the offices during the protest to protect the welfare of staff. The plans for the former zoo site in Clifton include building 196 new homes – image: Bristol Zoological Society The FCA released a warning notice for “RST Group Holdings Ltd (t/a Acorn Property Invest / Acorn / Acorn Property Group)” in December 2025 warning prospective investors that the companies are not authorised by the FCA to “carry out or promote financial services in the UK”. The Acorn Property Group spokesperson said the warning relates only to wording previously used in marketing materials for its investment arm and “does not amount to any finding of fraudulent activity”. The company added it is working with the FCA to remove the notice. “We remain fully committed to delivering the scheme, which will include a mix of housing, a cafe, playground and free public access to the gardens for the first time in history,” the spokesperson told Bristol24/7. Campaigners believe there is still time to reverse the historic zoo’s closure – photo: Rob Browne Morris addressed concerns over tree removal at the site: “There are 218 existing trees, 45 groups of trees and four hedges. “Under the planning consent, 80 trees and three hedges will be removed, 44 trees will be translocated and 470 new trees will be planted. “This work is scheduled to finish before the bird nesting season.” Morris added: “The Society continues to be committed to the sale of Bristol Zoo Gardens to Acorn Property Group, and we expect to complete the sale shortly.”,,,

Economic downturn post Iran war – recession, depression. UK households face £300 increase in energy bills because of Donald Trump’s Iran war The conflict is set to have a devastating effect on Britain’s economy and living standards. Household energy bills are set to rise by more than £300 because of Donald Trump’s war against Iran, experts have warned. The Government said it was monitoring the situation “hour by hour” and stands ready to help struggling families, but Chancellor Rachel Reeves suffered a blow last night as official figures showed public debt rising faster than expected. Borrowing jumped to £14.3 billion in February, £2.2 billion higher than a year ago, despite predictions that it would fall. Experts said the Treasury faced a “double squeeze”, with the conflict in the Gulf likely to cut tax revenue by damaging Britain’s economy, at the same time as placing the Chancellor under pressure to provide cash for struggling businesses and households. Conservative Shadow Chancellor Mel Stride said the borrowing rise was a result of Labour’s “irresponsible choices”, including allowing the benefits bill to soar. He said: “We’re saddling the next generation with the cost of their failure to live within our means.” Treasury Minister James Murray, the Chief Secretary to the Treasury, said: “We know there is more to do to. We have to stop spending £1 in every £10 on debt interest, so more money can be spent on policing, schools and the NHS.” The unexpected rise in borrowing is likely to limit the Chancellor’s room for manoeuvre after a package of support following Russia’s 2022 invasion of Ukraine, including subsidies for energy bills and council tax, cost the Treasury £51 billion. Energy experts Cornwall Insight issued a prediction that the Ofgem price cap, which limits what suppliers can charge domestic consumers, will rise to £1,973 per year for the average household, up by £332 from April’s figure. They previously predicted a £4 increase, but changed the new figure is a direct result of the war against Iran, including attacks on Iran’s South Pars gasfield, the largest in the world, and Iranian strikes on a gas facility in Qatar. Craig Lowrey, Principal Consultant at Cornwall Insight, said: “Gas markets were already volatile, and the Israeli strike on Iran’s South Pars field, and Iran’s subsequent retaliation, has increased that instability.” He added: “The ultimate scale of any increases in bills, whether in July or further ahead, will depend on how long the disruption continues.” It echoed a warning from the Bank of England earlier this week, which said conflict in the Middle East “has caused a significant increase in global energy and other commodity prices, which will affect households’ fuel and utility prices and have indirect effects via businesses’ costs.” Ofgem’s price cap is based on average wholesale prices over a three-month period. Gas prices have been climbing in recent weeks, and this is likely to feed through into future electricity prices and the cost of heating homes. UK natural gas prices reached a three-year high on Thursday after jumping by around 25% during the day, and eased back a little on Friday. Martin Beck, chief economist at WPI Strategy, said the Chancellor’s efforts to control debt may be doomed to failure if the war continues. He said: “The shock to energy prices creates a double squeeze for the public finances if it persists. “Higher oil and gas prices would lift North Sea revenues, and stronger inflation could boost receipts from VAT and frozen tax allowances, but those gains would likely be outweighed by the damage to tax revenues from weaker growth and higher public spending on welfare, debt interest costs, and pressure for fiscal support for households and energy-intensive businesses.” Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer warned that the longer the conflict continues, “the bigger the impact on the cost of living.” He said: “The best way forward is a negotiated settlement with Iran”.

Robert Braxman on Microsoft ‘Windows Hate’, having to subscribe monthly to basic software and throw away all privacy by saving all your information to ‘The Cloud’. Rob Braxman Tech: The Real Reason Windows Hate Is Exploding: It’s Not Just the UI—It’s the End of Personal Computing Windows users sitting in the sidelines are not understanding the source of the Windows hate. But that’s because the messages are not getting through. Windows is changing. In a big way. The changes are so huge that really it is evolving to a completely different kind of computing experience that may have no connection anymore to Windows XP. BraX3 Privacy Phone is on https://braxtech.net Brax Virtual Phone, De-Googled Phones, BytzVPN, BraxMail, BraxRouters are available on https://brax.me

Bitcute boss Ray Vahey tells all. Digital ID. Police not doing their job – Nick Georges attacked by far right – police did nothing. Dan Dicks interviews Bitchute boss who says he couldn’t operate in Europe so had to go to US – freedom of speech and privacy issues. When The CENSORSHIP HAMMER Comes Down Again Will You Be Prepared?? JOIN BITCHUTE NOW!!! Press For Truth When Ray Vahey saw the censorship that was happening to those of us in the field of alternative media he decided to step up to the plate and do something about it by launching a YouTube alternative called Bitchute!! In this video Dan Dicks of Press For Truth speaks with the founder and CEO of Bitchute Ray Vahey about why he started the platform, the censorship he has faced while helping others avoid censorship and how you can hedge yourself against more censorship that will inevitably be coming in the near future!

Eugene Costello, investigative journalist, on how his story about holiday home mis-selling (fraud) could not be published in major Sunday newspaper due to legal concerns.

WW3? Israel attacks Iranian leaders and Iran gas field. Iran’s South Pars Gas Field Is Attacked, Sending Energy Prices Soaring The field is part of a vast gas reservoir shared by Iran and Qatar. The strike appeared to be one of the most significant attacks on an energy site since the U.S.-Israeli air war against Iran began. Iran and Qatar on Wednesday accused Israel of attacking a giant offshore natural gas field that the two countries share, sending the prices of oil and natural gas soaring on what would be a sharp escalation of strikes on energy infrastructure in the war against Iran. Iran uses most of its natural gas domestically, meaning that the strikes will most likely have a limited effect on the global supply of gas, which is used in power plants, home furnaces and heavy industry. But the attacks signal that the Persian Gulf’s extensive energy facilities may be at growing risk. Iran’s oil ministry said on social media that airstrikes had damaged a number of its facilities connected to the South Pars gas field. It appeared to be one of the most significant energy sites to be hit since the U.S.-Israeli air war against Iran began nearly three weeks ago. Iranian state media reported that oil and petrochemical facilities in the southern city of Asaluyeh, a key hub for the country’s energy industry, were also hit by an airstrike. The extent of the damage was not immediately clear, and Iranian state media reported that fires at the energy facilities had been brought under control. But the strikes illustrated how the war has threatened oil and gas production facilities. The South Pars field accounts for about 70 to 75 percent of Iran’s natural gas production. Most of that fuel is used in the country, partly because Western economic sanctions constrain Iran’s ability to trade internationally. But reports of the attack caused the price of Brent Crude, the international oil benchmark, to surge more than 6 percent to over $109 a barrel as investors worried that the attack may prompt Iran to strike oil and gas fields and facilities in countries like Saudi Arabia that have close relations with the United States. The price of natural gas also rose by about 6 percent in Europe. Qatar condemned the attacks. Majed al-Ansari, a spokesman for Qatar’s foreign ministry, accused Israel of taking a “dangerous and irresponsible step,” and warned that targeting shared energy infrastructure could threaten global energy security. Israel did not immediately comment on the reports. Iran’s semiofficial Tasnim news agency quoted the governor of Asaluyeh as saying that attacks on South Pars gas facilities “caused fires in several refinery units.” He said the fires were contained and “the situation in the area is now fully under control,” Tasnim reported. South Pars makes up about a third of the world’s largest natural gas reserve, which stretches from Qatar toward Iran and contains enough to supply the world’s needs for about 13 years, according to Reuters. Qatar’s facilities there did not appear to have been targeted on Wednesday. Qatar, which calls its fields in the reservoir the North Dome, is the world’s third-largest exporter of liquefied natural gas and has made hundreds of billions of dollars from the industry over decades. (To transport natural gas on oceangoing ships, companies must cool it until it turns into liquid.) Many of its installations in reservoir are joint ventures with Western energy companies, including the U.S. giants ExxonMobil and ConocoPhillips.

Report from Tehran about Iranians celebrating Al Quds Day. Iranian president attends Quds Day rally in Iran Masoud Pezeshkian greeted people and took selfies in Tehran without security alongside him, according to state media. A TV presenter called it “a symbol of bravery and resistance of all Iranians”. Iran’s Larijani attends Quds Day march in Tehran, defying Israeli warning TEHRAN — One woman has been killed after multiple explosions were heard around the al-Quds Day march in the Iranian capital on Friday, where thousands were taking part in annual rallies held in solidarity with Palestinians, as US-Israeli attacks across the nation continued for the 14th day. Iran’s national security chief Ali Larijani, attending the mass rally in Tehran, dismissed the latest Israeli-US attacks on the capital as being “out of desperation.” “These attacks are out of fear, out of desperation. One who is strong wouldn’t bomb demonstrations at all. It’s clear that it has failed,” Larijani told state TV while marching for the annual rally in support of the Palestinian cause. A large midday explosion on Friday rocked a Tehran square filled with demonstrators who were there for the annual event, Iranian state television reported. The cause of the blast in Ferdowsi Square was not immediately known, but it came shortly after Israel had threatened people to clear the area because it planned a strike. State media outlet Press TV said one woman was killed from shrapnel as a result of a US-Israeli airstrike, without providing any other specifics. Al Jazeera Arabic reported an air strike meters away from the gathering of protesters in Tehran. Crowds turned out in Tehran and other cities, despite ongoing US and Israeli strikes in the region during the commemoration, state media reported. Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian called on the population to participate despite the war. On Thursday, he posted on X urging his fellow Iranians to “disappoint Iran’s enemies by taking to the streets in greater numbers than ever before”. Iran has marked al-Quds Day on the last Friday of the Muslim holy month of Ramadan since its 1979 Islamic Revolution, after the occasion was declared by the republic’s founder and first Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khomeini. 

What is goal of Israel? Al Jazeera – attack on South Pars gas field – Trump didn’t know Israel was going to attack.  Trump says US had ‘no idea’ Israel would attack Pars gas field in Iran US president warns Iran of ‘massive’ response if Qatar energy sites hit again US President Donald Trump on Thursday America had ‘no idea’ of Israel’s attack on facilities linked to Iran’s oil industry in South Pars and Asaluyeh, warning of severe military consequences if Tehran launches more attacks on Qatar’s energy infrastructure, as tensions across the Gulf escalated following strikes on major liquefied natural gas facilities. In a post on Truth Social, Trump said, “Israel, out of anger for what has taken place in the Middle East, has violently lashed out at a major facility known as South Pars Gas Field in Iran. A relatively small section of the whole has been hit.” On Wednesday, facilities linked to Iran’s oil industry in South Pars and Asaluyeh came under attack, according to the semi-official Tasnim news agency “The United States knew nothing about this particular attack, and the country of Qatar was in no way, shape, or form, involved with it, nor did it have any idea that it was going to happen,” Trump said, adding that Israel will “NO MORE” target Iran’s South Pars gas field unless Tehran “unwisely decides to attack a very innocent, in this case, Qatar”. In such a scenario, the United States, “with or without the help or consent of Israel, will massively blow up the entirety of the South Pars Gas Field at an amount of strength and power that Iran has never seen or witnessed before”, Trump wrote on Truth Social. “I do not want to authorize this level of violence and destruction because of the long term implications that it will have on the future of Iran, but if Qatar’s LNG is again attacked, I will not hesitate to do so,” he added. The remarks came amid mounting regional alarm after Qatar reported fires and damage at its Ras Laffan Industrial City, one of the world’s largest hubs for liquefied natural gas production. Regional fallout Qatar’s foreign ministry condemned what it described as Iranian attacks on energy facilities in Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, saying the strikes have “crossed all red lines.” It called the targeting of such infrastructure a violation of international law and a threat to global energy security and navigation. Iran’s attacks on the Gulf were a reprisal against Israel’s strike on Iran’s half of South Pars, the world’s largest gas field that the Islamic Republic shares with Qatar.

Rubio – at start of war US knew Israel was going to attack Iran, so went for it too. Israel calling shots.

Illegal war. Netanyahu speech. Cultural sites being bombed.

South Lebanon to rubble. Pete Hegseth – rebuilding of 3rd Temple and Trump anointed by Jesus. Hegseth reading old testament. Apocalypse to bring back Jesus.

Tulsi Gabbard – was Iran a threat to US? Mohseen Abbas, Deep Dive Perspective, interviews Mohammed Morandi who thinks war against Iran continues the waking up of the World to Israel’s bad behaviour.

Mick Lynch, RMT – British military not in a good state – Starmer right to hold back.

Iran Mohammad Marandi on Deep Dive Perspective – US and Israel see themselves as the master race.Iran vs The West: Is a Global Economic Crisis Next? | Prof Marandi Deep Dive Perspective Are we on the brink of a global economic crisis? Discover how the escalating Iran vs The West dynamics will determine what happens next! Welcome to the Deep Dive Perspective podcast. Today, Prof Marandi joins us to analyze the nuanced reality of Iran vs The West. As geopolitical tensions rise across the Middle East, many experts fear a global economic crisis is exactly what comes next. Prof Marandi breaks down the mainstream media narratives, complex regional responses, and the profound societal resilience shaping this historical moment. By examining the deep-rooted history of Iran vs The West, we explore how current foreign policy decisions might trigger a severe global economic crisis. Will international diplomacy finally prevail, or is a massive financial market shift what happens next? If you want the unfiltered truth behind the headlines, Prof Marandi delivers an unparalleled masterclass on international relations. What do you think is the solution to this global tension? Share your thoughts in the comments below! Please hit the like button and subscribe to our channel to support independent journalism! Guests Info: Professor Mohammad Marandi is a prominent political analyst, academic, and professor of North American Studies at the University of Tehran, known for his expert insights into international relations and Middle Eastern geopolitics.

Press TV – Israel bombed Tehran’s main car servicing dealership. At least 56 museums and historical monuments, including world heritage sites, have been damaged by the US-Israeli aggression, Iran’s Ministry of Cultural Heritage, Tourism, and Handicrafts says. In a report published on Saturday, regarding the state of Iran’s cultural and historical monuments since the start of the US-Israeli aggression, the ministry said numerous museums and historically and culturally significant locations have been damaged. According to the ministry, at least 19 locations in the capital, Tehran, including Golestan Palace, have been damaged by the attacks. In western Iran, in Kurdistan Province, at least 12 locations, including world heritage sites, have been damaged by the US-Israeli aggression. In central Iran, in Isfahan Province, several world heritage monuments, including Chehel Sotoon and Naqshe Jahan Square, have been targeted. In Lorestan and Kermanshah provinces, several historical buildings have been damaged during the aggression. In Siraf Port, in Bushehr Province, several historical monuments have been damaged during the strikes. In western Iran, in Ilam Province, the Museum of Archeology, which houses numerous historical artifacts, has been targeted by the aggression. In a post on X on Thursday, Iran’s Minister of Foreign Affairs, Sayyed Abbas Araghchi, condemned the US-Israeli attacks against Iran’s cultural and historical heritage. “Israel is bombing Iranian historical monuments dating as far back as the 14th century. Multiple UNESCO World Heritage Sites have been struck,” he wrote. “It is natural that a regime that will not last a century hates nations with ancient pasts. But where is UNESCO? Its silence is unacceptable,” he added. Iran’s Foreign Ministry spokesman has condemned an attack by the United States and Israel on a historic site of Isfahan, saying the strike constitutes a crime against cultural heritage. According to the 1954 Hague Convention, the 1977 Geneva Conventions, the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, and established international law, any attack on historical sites and cultural heritage in Iran is a flagrant violation of international humanitarian law and a clear example of a war crime. The US and Israeli armed forces began their military aggression against Iran in late February by attacking 30 targets across Tehran, killing several senior Iranian officials, including the Leader of the Islamic Republic, Ayatollah Sayyed Ali Khamenei.

Trump – comments while with Japanese leader. Trump constantly contradicting himself. Patricia Opulenza poem. All the times Trump contradicted himself in plea for help in Iran war Donald Trump has been accused of backtracking and contradicting his own statements regarding the war in Iran. Speaking at a press conference later yesterday, Trump slammed the UK for its response to the war, calling it ‘very disappointing’. Trump has also asked France, China, Japan, South Korea and Britain to help secure the Strait of Hormuz. But the President’s own remarks have seemed to contradict himself, telling reporters: ‘Really, I’m demanding that these countries come in and protect their own territory – because it is their territory.’ Less than an hour later, he said: ‘They should come, and they should help us protect it. You could make the case that maybe we shouldn’t even be there at all, because we don’t need it. ‘We have a lot of oil. We’re the number one producer anywhere in the world times two.’ Seemingly referencing NATO, Trump added, ‘If we need help, they won’t be there for us. I’ve known that for a long period of time.’ Again, moments later, he said: ‘We have some who are enthusiastic. They’re coming.’ Speaking to reporters, Trump also said ‘we want them to come and help us with the Strait (of Hormuz)’. Later, he clarified: ‘My attitude is we don’t need anybody. We have the strongest nation in the world. We have the strongest military by far – we don’t need them.’ Varying lengths of the Iran War At the beginning of the war, Trump said he thought the strikes in Iran would be ‘four weeks or so’. Days later, he said the war was ‘very complete, pretty much’ – before, on the same day, saying the war wouldn’t end that week, but would ‘very soon’. On why the US attacked Iran In an address made shortly after attacks began, Trump said: ‘Our objective is to defend the American people by eliminating imminent threats from the Iranian regime. ‘They can never have a nuclear weapon. That is why in Operation Midnight Hammer last June, we obliterated the regime’s nuclear program — at Fordo, Natanz and Isfahan — after that attack, we warned them never to resume their malicious pursuit of nuclear weapons.’ Days later, Trump said he ‘knew Iran was going to attack’, claiming that if the US didn’t fight, Iran would attack first.

Videos of full shows – Essentials: Michael Hudson | Blackrock/Vanguard | Netanyahu at the 7/7 London Bombings | Why/how Israel Assassinated JFK & RFK | Operation Gladio | Tony on Brexit & (4th Reich) Traitors of Arnhem | Creation vs. Evolution | God vs. Lucifer | ‘Great Plan’ for 3 World Wars | Devil Worship: The Rise Of Satanism | Nuclear Armed IDF Doomsday Cult | Aanirfan | Armageddonists I have known: Nick Land (1976-8) | George Monbiot (1995-7) | Manna for the Revelation Generation: CONSPIRACY CLASSICS, longer interviews/lectures

Part Two – International news review, Accelerationist, Armageddonist reports and investigations

FT – Ex Bilderberg chairman Etienne Davignon, 93, accused of Patrice Lumumba assassination. Belgian aristocrat to face charges over murder of Congo’s first premier Étienne Davignon, 93, is the only surviving former official accused in connection to Patrice Lumumba’s death A Belgian aristocrat who served as diplomat and European commissioner will have to face trial regarding his possible involvement in the murder of Patrice Lumumba, the Congolese prime minister and independence leader assassinated in 1961. Count Étienne Davignon, 93, the only remaining survivor among the 10 Belgians accused of involvement in the murder, was on Tuesday ordered to appear before a court over his potential participation in war crimes. Lumumba was the first prime minister of the Democratic Republic of Congo after it gained independence from Belgium in 1960, following about 75 years of brutal colonial rule. He was murdered in Katanga on January 17 1961, an act that occurred with the support of the Belgian government, according to the findings of a parliamentary commission in 2001. In 2011, Lumumba’s son filed a criminal complaint against 10 Belgian nationals, accusing them of complicity in his father’s murder. Other family members later joined the claim. The assassination of Congo’s first democratically elected prime minister was a defining moment of the cold war. It cemented western influence over Congo and contributed, according to historians, to preventing the vast nation at the heart of Africa from emerging as an independent nation in the years afterwards. In martyrdom, Lumumba became one of the most enduring symbols of Africa’s struggle against colonial rule. The circumstances of his capture, torture and death have been the subject of countless films and books. According to the Belgian federal prosecutor’s office, Davignon faces charges “for participation in war crimes related to the unlawful detention or unlawful transfer of a person protected by the Geneva Conventions; for having deprived prisoners of war or an occupied population of the right to a fair and impartial trial; and for humiliating and degrading treatment against Lumumba”. Patrice Lumumba speaks at a press conference, gesturing with one hand as microphones are held toward him. Patrice Lumumba, the first prime minister of the Democratic Republic of Congo © AFP/Getty Images Davignon, who did not respond to a request for comment, was an intern in the Belgian foreign ministry’s department for African affairs at the time of the murder, working in Belgium and the Congo. A veteran Belgian dealmaker with deep ties to Europe’s energy and industrial groups, Davignon was born in 1932 and later became head of cabinet of Belgium’s foreign minister Paul-Henri Spaak. In the 1970s and 1980s he was EU commissioner for the internal market and industry. Lumumba’s family called Tuesday’s ruling by the Brussels appeals court “a significant step: one that acknowledges, however belatedly, the weight of decisions made against the life of Patrice Emery Lumumba”. “The legal system of Belgium begins, at last, to confront its own responsibilities for acts committed in the name of colonial rule. For our family, this is not the end of a long fight, it is the beginning of a reckoning that history has long demanded,” the family added. “What we ask of this court is simple: the truth, spoken aloud, in the open, on the record of justice and history,” said the Lumumba family.

Oliver Tickell on the Iran war – UK and Europe trying to do deals with Iran over Strait of Hormuz. EXCLUSIVE Oliver Tickell on US Europe Divide over Iran War. Trump using UK bases, ignored Starmer Russia sends tankers to Cuba. Europeans rebelling against US and Israel closing the Straits of Hormuz by secretly negotiating with Iran Starmer afraid t tell Trump he can’t use Gloucestershire RAF base to bomb Iran

THE Greatest book exposing Israel’s being behind the 9/11 Attacks – Solving 9/11, Chris Bollyn (2009) 1. 9-11 Through the Eyes of an American Skeptic As a journalist and skeptic of the unproven official version, I have examined the facts and evidence and concluded that the U.S. government and controlled media have engaged in a conspiracy to deceive the world about what really happened on 9-11. 2. The Planes of 9-11 A foreign and privately-owned aircraft leasing company is connected to the airport security and passenger screening company at the center of the terror attacks of 9-11. 3. America the Target: 9-11 and the History of False Flag Terrorism An examination of key events in the history of false-flag terror attacks and the people behind them. 4. The Terror Drills That Became Real: 9-11, the London Bombings & the Sinking of Estonia The past two decades have been marked by a number of terror events which occurred during security exercises in which the scenario was identical to the real-life terror attack. 5. How Did Spy Software Get Onto FAA Computers? 9-11 was also a sophisticated computer crime, carried out through long-term foreign infiltration of the most sensitive U.S. military and government computer networks. 6. Who Controls Our Elections? The stealing of American elections is primarily a computer crime, as were the terror attacks of 9-11. These crimes are carried out by criminals using computer code and enterprise software. 6-A. The Florida Connection Florida was the central networking base and staging area for the “false flag” terror attacks of 9/11. Fifteen of the nineteen Arabs allegedly involved in the hijackings, for example, lived and had their base of operations in South Florida. A preponderance of evidence indicates that Israeli military intelligence was the master organization behind the “Arab” terrorist network based in Florida. 7. The Architecture of Terror: Mapping the Network Behind 9-11 Information from material in the public domain supporting the thesis that Israeli military intelligence agencies were involved in the false-flag terror of 9-11. 8. The Mass Media & the 9-11 Cover-Up Who controls the “hidden hand” in the U.S. mass media that censors and suppresses the crucial 9-11 evidence? What is the nexus connecting the architects of 9-11 with the mass media moguls who are covering up the truth? 9. Who Really Controls Our Political Parties? Politicians in the United States and Britain are made to submit to the Zionist masters who control our political parties. By forcing our leaders to accept the Zionist yoke our nations have become subjugated to a foreign agenda. 12. The Nexus Linking 9-11 and the Financial Crisis Behind such massive criminal hoaxes as 9-11 and the financial crises and government bail-outs are years of planning and preparation by high-level criminal organizations. 14. Game Over: The Discovery of Super-Thermite in the Rubble The discovery of active super-thermite in the dust of the WorldTradeCenter is crucial to understanding what really happened on 9-11. This scientific discovery reveals that tons of sophisticated explosives were packed into the twin towers long before the planes struck them. Conclusion – The 9/11 Cover Up XV The Destruction of the Evidence

Nigel Day, CND, on Fairford being a major US base sending military jets and drones to Iran. Protests happening at Fairford. Protestors to hold naming of the dead ceremony at RAF Fairford, as thousands take action against war on Iran across the country As the US and Israeli attacks on Iran continue, the number of innocent civilians killed as a result of the conflict continues to rise. By far the most shocking atrocity to date is the US cruise missile attack on the Shajareh Tayyebeh girls’ elementary school in Minab on 28 February, which killed 175 people, the vast majority of whom were school children. In contrast to US military personnel who have been killed in the war, the British government and mainstream media have made virtually no effort to remember the dead children, humanise them, or respect their memories. Since that devastating attack, 18 US B-1 and B-52 heavy bomber aircraft have amassed at RAF Fairford and have started daily bombing missions. The British government has made the claim that these bombers will only be involved in “defensive” missions, even though the US and Israel are illegal aggressors conducting offensive strikes. The British government has failed to give any evidence that it can control, or even know, the targets that US aircraft flying out of Fairford are attacking. With no end to this conflict in sight, Fairford Action will be holding a naming the dead ceremony outside the main gate of RAF Fairford, where we will read out the names of those who were killed in the airstrike on the school, as well as leaving children’s backpacks and clothes, and photos of those who died. The protest at Fairford is part of a nationwide day of action against the bombing of Iran, including another major demonstration in London which assembles at Russell Square from 12 noon followed by a rally at Whitehall. CND General Secretary Sophie Bolt said: “This powerful protest at RAF Fairford couldn’t be more important. The US-Israeli war on Iran is a total disaster. In three weeks they have killed thousands of people, created a global economic crisis and risk dragging the entire world into a war that could go nuclear. Keir Starmer needs to end British support for this catastrophe – that means pulling the plug on the use of British bases, as well as ending all British military engagement.”

Oliver Tickell on Iran war. Breakdown of fuel costs – 1/3 is actual price  Profiteering. Future markets for oil and gas. UK could not fare well. Oil and gas prices jump after Iran and Israel attack gasfields State-run QatarEnergy says Iranian attack on its facilities has wiped out 17% of its LNG capacity for up to five years Gas prices jumped to four-year highs and oil prices rose again after an escalation of attacks by Israel and Iran on gasfields heightened fears of prolonged disruption to international energy supplies. QatarEnergy told Reuters on Thursday that Iran had damaged facilities that produced 17% of the state-owned company’s liquefied natural gas (LNG) export capacity and that it would take three to five years to repair them. Brent crude, the global oil benchmark, rose by 10% to $119 a barrel at one point before slipping back to $110 a barrel, a gain of 3.3%. Crude prices have soared by 60% since the US-Israeli war on Iran started on 28 February. European gas prices jumped, with the Dutch wholesale gas price up 24% at €68 a megawatt hour, the highest since the end of December 2022, before easing back. They have more than doubled since before the war. UK gas prices have also more than doubled since late February and are likely to drive up household bills. The month-ahead UK wholesale gas price rose by 23% on Thursday morning to 172p a therm, its highest level since August 2022. It remains well below the peak of 800p a therm that was momentarily hit in March 2022. Traders are responding to the escalation in the Middle East, where Tehran stepped up its attacks on energy facilities, causing significant damage to Ras Laffan in Qatar, the world’s largest LNG facility, in response to Israel’s attack on Iran’s South Pars gasfield. The escalation of the war and its effect on oil and gas prices triggered a sharp sell-off across stock markets. Japan’s Nikkei tumbled 3.4%, South Korea’s Kospi fell 2.7% and Hong Kong’s Hang Seng was down 2%. European markets followed Asia. The UK’s FTSE 100 was down nearly 3% by early afternoon before closing down 2.35% at 10,063 points. Germany’s Dax and France’s CAC were 2.3% and 2.2% lower respectively. Wall Street opened lower. Donald Trump has threatened to “massively blow up” South Pars if Iran attacks Qatar again. Israel’s decision to target the Iranian gasfield was a significant escalation of the war. QatarEnergy said Ras Laffan suffered “extensive damage” in Iranian strikes.

Land registry opening up. Government to lift paywall from large parts of the Land Registry Finding out who owns land in England is to become much simpler because a paywall will be lifted from large parts of the Land Registry, the government is to announce. A small number of landowners control the majority of land but finding out who owns what is difficult to piece together, even for government departments, owing to the way the Land Registry operates. Freeing up access will make it easier to determine ownership of key areas, such as river catchments, grouse moors and peatland. The change comes as part of a major reform to the way England’s land is managed. The government’s long-awaited land use framework – to be unveiled by Emma Reynolds, the environment secretary, on Wednesday afternoon – marks the first time that government has attempted to assess how best to use farmland, nature reserves and areas of degraded land to help balance competing needs for land for food production, housing, energy and industry. For the first time, ministers will set out how much land is needed to meet the UK’s net zero target through growing forests and restoring peatland as “carbon sinks” and through energy generation from solar and windfarms. Only about 1% of land will be needed for renewable energy generation, according to the government’s new estimate, and much of the land required will still be used for food production, for instance through livestock grazing around windfarms and under solar panels. New mapping will also make it easier to assess how the restoration of peatlands in upland areas could reduce flooding from rivers, which is expected to worsen as the climate crisis deepens. Reynolds said: “It is more important than ever that we make the right decisions about our finite land, especially in the face of the dual threat of the climate and nature crises. The land use framework will hardwire climate resilience and nature-based solutions into our decision-making to ensure that we have safe homes for the future.” Annoying Guy Shrubsole, Mombioid author of Who Owns England?, said: “The bold promise to open up the Land Registry would finally bring to an end a thousand years of secrecy shrouding who owns England, and enable greater scrutiny of what goes on behind the barbed-wire fences that crisscross the countryside. Given that 1% of the population own half of England, it’s only reasonable that the largest landowners should be held most responsible for restoring nature to these dewilded isles. The new land use framework is an ambitious step towards making England a greener, fairer and more pleasant land.” However, the government will stop well short of directing how land must be used in any area. There will be no attempts to force landowners to give up control and no national scheme to mandate the conversion of land to carbon sinks. The framework will be used to “steer” housebuilders away from constructing homes on floodplains, after concerns about the number of new-build homes at risk from flooding as the deregulation crisis, spun as climate crisis, worsens.

Jeffrey Epstein had two key aides – why do they still control his money and secrets? Jeffrey Epstein appointed two men to be executors of his estate – his accountant Richard Kahn and lawyer Darren Indyke When the FBI raided Jeffrey Epstein’s New York mansion in July 2019, on the day he was arrested for child sex trafficking, agents forced open a large safe to find diamonds, bundles of cash, passports, binders of CDs and hard drives. But an issue with the warrant meant they could not leave with the items. And when they returned with a new one, the safe had been emptied while they were gone – according to FBI documents. Richard Kahn, Epstein’s accountant and bookkeeper since 2005, had told the mansion’s staff to pack two suitcases with the contents of the safe and deliver them to his home, agents wrote. After the FBI spoke to Kahn’s then lawyer, Kahn agreed to hand over the suitcases untouched, but he did not want agents coming to his house and declined to say who had told him to remove the items. However, a source close to the investigation into Epstein told us that he was not aware of Kahn ever being interviewed or investigated in relation to the paedophile financier’s criminal investigation. Kahn’s current lawyer told BBC News that his client had fully co-operated with the FBI’s requests. Kahn asked staff at Epstein’s New York mansion to remove items from a safe, according to the FBI Kahn, and Epstein’s long-serving lawyer Darren Indyke, are the sole executors of Epstein’s estate, controlling all his wealth and possessions. Although hardly household names, the pair now hold control over compensation owed to survivors and the secrets contained in the documents still held by the Epstein estate – which, upon request, have been released to the House Oversight Committee. As part of its investigation into Epstein’s network, the congressional committee has subpoenaed – summoned – the pair to testify. Kahn is appearing on Wednesday 11 March, while Indyke is due to testify on Thursday 19 March. We have spoken to people associated with investigations linked to Epstein, looked through papers from multiple court cases, and analysed the most recent material released in the Epstein files by the US Department of Justice – to try to uncover more about the role the two men are alleged to have played in Epstein’s life and continue to play after his death. Epstein appointed Indyke and Kahn as co-executors in August 2019, just two days before he died in jail awaiting trial for sex-trafficking minors. He revised his will to transfer all his wealth into a trust named after the year of his birth, which the lawyer and accountant would administer. In their role as executors, Indyke and Kahn have agreed compensation packages paid to survivors and included conditions that prevented survivors who accepted funds from taking further legal action against them personally. Other claims are still outstanding. As beneficiaries of the trust, the men could also be paid tens of millions of dollars each from whatever remains when the claims are settled. Court filings claim that, either Indyke and Kahn – but often both of them – “had signatory authority over virtually all of the accounts held by Epstein”, which meant they were authorised to make transactions. They also helped to run multiple Epstein corporations – some of which, it is alleged in court filings, existed solely for the purpose of his sex-trafficking operation. Kahn’s lawyer told us “there is no basis for such claims” and that Epstein’s businesses didn’t operate to shield his activities; “virtually all of them were tax-filing entities whose ownership was never hidden”.

BBC PM – Stephanie Flanders from Bloomberg on BoE likely raising interest rates this year and bad economic outlook from war. Ship Fuel Shortages Emerging Due to Mideast War, Supplier Says Shortages of shipping fuel are starting to emerge in Asia and West Africa as vessels seek supply outside the Middle East, according to marine fuel trader Monjasa Group Stephanie Flanders – oil running out and FTSE down.. The UAE port of Fujairah just outside the Strait of Hormuz — normally a key hub for shipping fuel — has suffered disruption from drone attacks. The uncertainty there is creating new and unexpected demand, according to Casper Borgen, general manager for Middle East and Africa at the firm. “From the epicenter in Hormuz, we are seeing how the rings spread to Asia and West Africa, where markets are also starting to experience a shortage of products due to the increasing demand without the supply being able to keep up,” he said by email. “There is a bottleneck in one of the world’s most important energy trade lanes, and this means many new and major challenges for all suppliers.” The turmoil in the Middle East has prompted rationing of fuel in Singapore, people involved in the trade said this week, with some distributors limiting or canceling sales. Scarcity is spreading to other regions, too, Vessels use a range of fuels from more polluting high-sulfur fuel oil to cleaner supplies, such as marine gasoil, which is used in areas with stricter environmental standards. At Fujairah, it’s become more difficult to load high-sulfur fuel oil and very low-sulfur fuel oil due to partially closed terminals, according to Monjasa. Borgen said the company is seeing large shifts in demand patterns each day, and that consumption has also increased in Latin America, led by Panama, Colombia. “In these markets, we are seeing higher volumes and challenges with availability,” Borgen said.

Dominic Cummings on Cabinet government being fake. “Both sides are happy with the fake version of government” | Dominic Cummings on scripted politics You may contribute to the labours of content creation and subsequent growth for everyone who seeks to detach from the psychology of systemic deception. Contributions to the cause would help offset the toil, time and effort spent researching as close to the bone as possible as well as aiding ongoing live-streaming improvements. The gesture would be greatly appreciated….

Can we remove US from UK military bases? UK allowing US use of military bases could violate international law, rights groups warn Human Rights Watch calls for ‘urgent clarification’ from Prime Minister Keir Starmer on whether base usage compliant with international law Rights groups are sounding the alarm over the legality of UK involvement in US military strikes on Iran, following the government’s decision to allow American use of its military bases. In a letter to the prime minister, attorney general and foreign secretary seen by Middle East Eye, Human Rights Watch UK director Yasmine Ahmed demanded “urgent clarification” on the steps taken by the government to ensure that US military strikes conducted from its bases are compliant with international humanitarian law. Prime Minister Keir Starmer confirmed in early March that the UK had agreed to allow the US to use its military bases for what he said were defensive purposes. On Friday, Downing Street announced that the agreement had been expanded to allow for the US to launch strikes from UK bases on Iranian sites targeting the Strait of Hormuz – also invoking “collective self-defence” of Gulf state allies as a legal basis for the decision. Ahmed said that, while the government’s legal justification for the move invokes self-defence, it fails to mention issues related to international humanitarian law. She emphasised that, despite this omission, both international humanitarian law (IHL) and international criminal law (ICL) “are applicable to the UK’s decision to allow the US to use its military bases to strike targets in Iran”. The letter explained that, under Common Article 1 (CA1) of the Geneva Conventions, states are obligated to ensure respect for IHL, but are also bound to ensure others who are party to a conflict do the same. Ahmed noted that, while the UK government disputed this second obligation in a recent judicial review of its decision to continue exporting F35 parts to Israel, it is “inconsistent with well documented practice”. She explained that the blanket approach “fails to take account of how obligation may arise in the context of joint military operations or where a state is providing support to another state in the context of military operations, where the issue of ability to influence is clear”. “Providing support, which would include the use of a military base, with the knowledge that such support will contribute to violations of IHL would violate CA1,” Ahmed said. She added that states were obliged to take proactive steps to stop rights violations by exerting influence on the party that is committing them. “Importantly, this obligation is not limited to stopping ongoing violations; it also includes an obligation to prevent violations when there is a foreseeable risk that they will occur and to prevent further violations in case they have already occurred,” Ahmed emphasised. Serious questions unanswered The letter outlined a number of instances which have raised questions around US compliance with IHL and its approach to civilian harm. These include an airstrike on Shajareh Tayyebeh primary school in the southern Iranian city of Minab, at the start of the US-Israeli assault on 28 February. At least 175 people were killed in the attack, most of them children. A preliminary investigation into the strike by the Pentagon found that the US military was responsible for the attack….

UN Emergency Meeting – Bahrain Ambassador not happy with Iran. What is going to happen in the future with Iran war? Gulf states and Iran trade barbs at UN emergency meeting on Middle East shipping Gulf states and Iran exchanged sharp verbal attacks during emergency talks at the UN maritime body over Middle East shipping disruptions and regional security concerns. UNITED NATIONS: Gulf states and Iran exchanged sharp verbal attacks during an emergency session at the United Nations maritime body, which convened talks over mounting concerns about shipping disruptions in the Middle East. Maritime body holds emergency talks The international maritime organisation held emergency discussions focused on the escalating threats to shipping routes in the Middle East region. The session saw Gulf nations and Iran engage in a heated war of words, underscoring the deep tensions that continue to affect maritime security in the area. The emergency meeting was called to address the growing challenges faced by commercial vessels navigating through key Middle Eastern waterways, which serve as critical arteries for global trade and energy supplies. Tensions on display at the UN The diplomatic confrontation at the UN forum highlighted the ongoing rivalry between Gulf states and Iran, with both sides levelling accusations against each other. The exchanges reflected broader geopolitical frictions that have long affected the region’s stability and, by extension, international shipping lanes.

MP3 of Friday 13th March 2026 show [right click to download] (from c. 11pm) This week’s full interview mp3s, bottom of page. SHOW STARTS 17:00 London time FOR c. 3½ HRS TO c. 20:30 – OUR LIVE STREAM to Listen live online. Alt. live stream, DJ Plug Radio OR Download Show After Transmission HERE. Repeats 11 & 5 AM & PM daily on our stream
Download NOT THE BCFM POLITICS SHOW APP [ANDROID APP (1)] Alternatives [GITHUB (2)] and [APKPURE (3)] – or the [Apple App store] – PS. You can replace evil Google Play, which banned us, with [the Aurora store]
Only 31% trust the UK Press! – UK media oligopoly TONY’S BOOKS: Bilderberg.org – 2 PAPER–BACKS – TONY’S CHANNELS: Telegram – Bitchute – 911 forum – Radio4All – The Land Is Ours – VK – Twitter/X – Farcebook – Brighteon – Rumble – RT Live on Rumble –  Goebbelsesque YouTube: This show; Public Enquiry; Peter Borenius; i-Contact & Occult Geopolitics

Radio4All mp3 audio files usually available from 23:00 2-4hrs, after TX – we’ll credit you if you rebroadcast. Any probs. mp3s should be on alternative links below by then

Part One – Local and National News Review

War on Iran causing depression. Anti-depressant and anti-psychotic drugs causing brain-death and addiction. Wouldn’t a chat with a vicar be better? Addressing the cause rather than the symptoms? Open Dialogue approach to psychiatric care is extended after a trial goes well – BBC report on this. This means mandatory damaging psychiatric drugs given when admitted to secure units could be stopped. The ODDESSI trial ODDESSI (Open Dialogue: Development and Evaluation of a Social Network Intervention for Severe Mental Illness) is a large-scale programme of research into crisis and continuing mental health care within the NHS. This programme is directed by Professor Stephen Pilling (UCL), funded by the National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) and managed by North East London NHS Foundation Trust (NELFT) and includes Open Dialogue and research teams in five NHS Trust research sites: ODDESSI aims to transform the current model of health care for patients with major mental health problems. The research asks several questions: Can we develop a way to offer Open Dialogue in the NHS that is acceptable to staff (including peers) and service-users? Does it fit in with how existing NHS services operate? Does offering Open Dialogue result in good clinical outcomes, and is it worth the money? What is the experience of service users, carers, and staff? Within the programme there are smaller projects focusing on: How NHS mental health services are configured, and how they change Mental health services and referral pathways in different Trusts Peers and their role within Open Dialogue teams Training people to deliver Open Dialogue Whether it would be possible to compare Open Dialogue to treatment-as-usual in a large multi-centre trial (the feasibility trial) The health economics of Open Dialogue and of treatment-as-usual Comparing Open Dialogue with NHS usual care: The trial The ODDESSI trial is working with participants receiving Open Dialogue or usual care to look at which approach is most helpful. We are also looking at whether a sense of shared decision making is important in recovery, and a person’s relationships, and what the experiences of carers and staff have been. The first participant was recruited in June 2019, and the final participants in August 2021. We follow up participants for two years with research interviews and by collecting information from their electronic records. Here Professor Stephen Pilling and Dr Russell Razzaque present an overview of the ODDESSI research programme and trial protocol. Capturing the experiences of carers in the trial As part of the trial, we aim to recruit a 20% subsample of carers, friends, family or individuals supporting the trial participants. The ODDESSI research team in Devon spoke with some of the carers that had been recruited about their experiences on the ODDESSI trial. Some of the quotes can be seen below.

Talk TV, Hartley-Brewer – Sir Richard Dalton, former UK ambassador to Iran, on the unnecessary and damaging war on Iran. Wars cooked up in Chatham House and RUSI? Ukraine’s moving borders over time. Talk TV: “You’re Telling LIES!” | Presenter ENDS Interview After EXPLOSIVE Row With Ex-UK Ambassador To Iran Julia Hartley-Brewer The longer the war in the Middle East continues, the more likely it is there will be economic damage in the UK, Sir Keir Starmer has warned. The Prime Minister insisted the economy was resilient and well placed to absorb the “likely impact” on households and businesses. He acknowledged people’s concerns about the threat of rising bills in the wake of the US-Israeli assault on Iran and Tehran’s reprisals against countries across the region. Oil prices have soared above 100 dollars a barrel for the first time since 2022 in response to the crisis. Julia Hartley-Brewer ends her interview with Sir Richard Dalton after he brings up “genocide in Gaza”. “I’m embarrassed that a former British ambassador could claim there was genocide in Gaza! That’s absolute nonsense!”

Dr. Neil Melvin, RUSI – what is Trump’s end game? Iran closing of Straits of Hormuz to US interests. US convoy to Straits of Hormuz? Neil Melvin – convoy won’t work. Why Trump’s Iran Strikes Are A Legal And Political Nightmare For Starmer – Occupying The Middle Ground In Europe But as RUSI’s international security director, Neil Melvin, pointed out, the US’s attacks have exposed the limits of international law and a lack of enforcement – and Europe’s difficult position. “Many have said Iran has been allowed to hide behind international law for many decades, and engage in terrorism against the United States and its allies,” Melvin said. “So therefore it’s a slightly strange position that the Europeans have adopted – that they often seem to be upholding more the rights of regimes which are repressing their populations and conducting terrorism. “So now we’ve seen the Europeans having to shift.” He said Trump’s action has revealed inconsistency within Europe’s position, as Spain continues to call the strikes an illegal act, and have even asked the US forces to leave their bases in Spain. But Germany “has come out quite firmly supporting President Trump while not necessarily agreeing with the legality of this”. Meanwhile, Starmer is somewhere in between. Melvin said: “The UK has been struggling to occupy a middle ground, so the longer this conflict goes on, the more these difficulties and contradictions in the European position, I think, are going to be exposed.” The pressure is on for Starmer to hold onto the course he has set out on – no matter how convoluted it may be. Legal Questions Loom There could be further danger ahead for Starmer over his attempts to avoid falling into legal trouble over the strikes, too. Dr Aurel Sari, international law expert from the University of Exeter, suggested Starmer’s legal defence “rests on a crucial distinction between offensive and defensive military action”. “Iran, responding to the US-Israeli assault, exercised its own right of self-defence, a right it was entitled to invoke under the UN Charter given the scale of the attack on it,” he said. “However, Iran’s strikes have not been limited to military targets, but also hit civilian infrastructure, including international airports, hotels and residential areas across the Gulf.” Iran has launched missiles and drone attacks against targets in Israel, Bahrain, Qatar, the United Arab Emirates, Kuwait and Iraq since Saturday. There are around 300,000 British citizens in the Gulf region. Sari continued: “Because those attacks on civilian targets served no genuine defensive purpose, they exceeded what international law permits in self-defence. “The government argues that this, together with Iranian drone strikes against RAF Akrotiri, entitles the UK to use force against Iran in the exercise of the right of individual and collective self-defence.” However, Sari said this position is “highly precarious in practice”, because US military operations “do not neatly separate offensive from defensive activities”. The same military bases operate both personnel and intelligence systems. He warned: “If British bases inadvertently support the broader US-Israeli campaign to destroy Iran’s military and change its government, the UK’s carefully constructed legal position collapses. “While the government has drawn a clear legal line, it may lack the ability to hold it.”

RAF Fairford – US B1 bombers. Satellites for targeting. Ministry of Defence will not say how many Iranian civilians killed by ‘defensive’ US strikes from UK bases, as questions grow about Starmer’s stance Britain’s Ministry of Defence (MoD) is refusing to tell the media or parliament how many Iranian civilians have been killed by US bombing missions from British air bases. Officials are also not commenting on whether target lists for so-called “defensive” US strikes from British soil are approved by the UK before each mission, or if they are audited afterwards. Further questions about whether the US uses artificial intelligence to compile these target lists, or whether it is allowed to load banned cluster bombs at UK bases, were rebuffed. The silence casts serious doubt on Keir Starmer’s claim that Britain is not involved in the war and is only letting Donald Trump use British bases for a “specific, limited defensive purpose”. The prime minister said US strikes from RAF Fairford in Gloucestershire and the British-occupied Indian Ocean island of Diego Garcia were “to destroy [Iran’s] missiles at source, in their storage depots or at their launchers.” When asked a series of simple questions about how Britain would monitor or enforce the target lists, the MoD and Attorney General’s Office refused to answer directly or make ministers available for an interview with Declassified. An MoD spokesperson said: “We won’t be providing a running commentary on our allies’ operations, including their use of our bases. “The United States has started using British bases for specific defensive operations to prevent Iran firing missiles into the region, which is putting British lives at risk.” This new goal of preventing Iran “firing missiles into the region” seems much broader than what is permitted by the government’s own legal advice. A summary of that position said the US should only use UK bases to “facilitate specific and limited defensive action against missile facilities in Iran which were involved in launching strikes at regional allies.” It is unclear how the UK can distinguish between missile stockpiles which Iran may need to lawfully retaliate against the US and Israel’s illegal attack, and those weapons that might be fired at civilian sites in the Gulf. Even in cases such as attacks on hotels in Bahrain, it has sometimes emerged that US troops were stationed inside. Professor Marc Weller, a former UN legal advisor, has said “it may not be realistic or practical to determine in each instance which Iranian missile facilities have targeted regional allies or, more to the point, which will do so in the future. Presumably some have been used to attack both Israel and US forces, and regional states. “Iran will certainly not be persuaded by this distinction. Its authorities will not be able to tell which US strikes launched from UK bases aim to protect UK regional allies, and which are part of the US’s overall aggressive campaign to subdue its government.”

Jacob Rees Mogg showing how Starmer knew that Mandelson hung out with Epstein. Farage thought Mandelson right for the job. Mandelson files: It’s difficult to see how Starmer can put this right Sir Keir Starmer promised to clean up politics, and yet he finds himself in the centre of one of the biggest political scandals this century. ‘Dark day for PM’ as first Mandelson files released Jonathan Powell thought the process was “unusual” and “weirdly rushed”. We already knew, because the PM admitted it in the House of Commons, that Sir Keir Starmer was aware of an “ongoing relationship” between Lord Mandelson and the paedophile financier Jeffrey Epstein. But to see in black and white the red flags being raised in a two-page due diligence report put together by the cabinet office was damning for the PM. Because it confirms that the PM was told the relationship between the pair was “particularly close” and continued well after Epstein was “first convicted of procuring an underage girl in 2008” for sex. It was flagged to Sir Keir that “Mandelson reportedly stayed in Epstein’s house while he was in jail in June 2009” and noted there was “general reputational risk” over his relationship with Epstein. It warned the PM that a political appointment – Lord Mandelson – rather than a diplomatic one was more risky: “If anything goes wrong, you could be more exposed as the individual is more connected to you personally.” The Mandelson files also revealed that Mr Powell, one of Sir Keir’s most trusted advisers, found Lord Mandelson’s appointment in December 2024 was “weirdly rushed” and that he had been “particularly cautious about the appointment”. Minutes of a call in September 2025 show that Mr Powell had “raised concerns about the individual and reputation” to Morgan McSweeney, the PM’s then chief of staff, and adds: “MM responded that the issues had been addressed.” Sir Philip Barton, the Foreign Office’s top civil servant at the time of Lord Mandelson’s appointment, “also had reservations”, according to Mr Powell. That the report was only two pages long and didn’t investigate more robustly Lord Mandelson’s relationship with Epstein, raises obvious questions. Captivate This content is provided by Captivate, which may be using cookies and other technologies. To show you this content, we need your permission to use cookies. You can use the buttons below to amend your preferences to enable Captivate cookies or to allow those cookies just once. You can change your settings at any time via the Privacy Options…

Richard Medhurst on Iran war – Iran destroyed many missile detection systems. Not enough coverage of damage to Israeli side. BLINDED: US Radars Wiped Out by Iranian Precision Strikes UN Journalist Richard Medhurst reports on Iranian precision strikes that targeted US THAAD radar systems in the Gulf, particularly the AN/TPY-2 and AN/FPS-132. This report provides independent analysis and documentary coverage of the Iran conflict and the operational and geopolitical consequences of recent strikes by both sides.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fBJTMt8Mmo4

CNBC – Epstein Files – redacted part where a 14 year old girl makes claims against Trump. Used for blackmail?  13-Year-Old Trump Accuser Has Key Details of Her Story Verified The story appeared in an FBI interview in the Epstein files. A woman who says Donald Trump abused her when she was 13 years old in 1984 shared information about her life that turned out to be true. While her story about Trump is still unproven, The Post and Courier, a newspaper in Charleston, South Carolina, was able to corroborate details of her life provided in recent releases from the federal government’s Jeffrey Epstein archives. The woman was interviewed four times by the FBI in 2019, detailing abuse she faced at the hands of Trump and Epstein. She gave details about her life and legal history that the newspaper was able to verify using news reports, court records, police reports, and government records from multiple states. None of the confirmed details are directly related to her allegations against Trump. In her interviews with the FBI, she describes Epstein’s activities in the mid-1980s on Hilton Head Island in South Carolina, where the financier sexually assaulted minors. She said that Epstein constantly pressured her to find more girls to “come party,” describing his friends as “disgusting.” These so-called parties usually involved alcohol and drugs, and would turn violent with beatings and hair pulling. She said that Trump forced her to commit a sexual act on him around 1984 after she traveled to New York or New Jersey with Epstein. She detailed that one incident took place while Trump was developing a casino in Atlantic City. She was led to Trump in a “very tall building with huge rooms.” Trump allegedly told others to leave the room, and told her, “Let me teach you how little girls are supposed to be,” before unzipping his pants and forcing her to perform a sex act. She told the FBI that she “bit the (expletive) out of it,” which angered Trump, who slapped her and cursed. A friend of the woman also reported her allegations about Trump to the FBI, asking that her friend be protected, according to an email circulated around the bureau that the Justice Department made public. The woman herself named business associates of Epstein in North Carolina who also abused her, and the newspaper was able to identify some of them. In a statement to the newspaper, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said the woman’s allegations were “baseless accusations from decades ago’’ that “are backed by zero evidence or facts. Leavitt described the accuser as “a sadly disturbed woman who has an extensive criminal history.” But Trump has sought to diminish and bury every Epstein revelation that paints him in a negative light, and his critics will point to this woman’s account as one of the reasons why.

Jeffrey Epstein had two key aides – why do they still control his money and secrets? Jeffrey Epstein appointed two men to be executors of his estate – his accountant Richard Kahn and lawyer Darren Indyke When the FBI raided Jeffrey Epstein’s New York mansion in July 2019, on the day he was arrested for child sex trafficking, agents forced open a large safe to find diamonds, bundles of cash, passports, binders of CDs and hard drives. But an issue with the warrant meant they could not leave with the items. And when they returned with a new one, the safe had been emptied while they were gone – according to FBI documents. Richard Kahn, Epstein’s accountant and bookkeeper since 2005, had told the mansion’s staff to pack two suitcases with the contents of the safe and deliver them to his home, agents wrote. After the FBI spoke to Kahn’s then lawyer, Kahn agreed to hand over the suitcases untouched, but he did not want agents coming to his house and declined to say who had told him to remove the items. However, a source close to the investigation into Epstein told us that he was not aware of Kahn ever being interviewed or investigated in relation to the paedophile financier’s criminal investigation. Kahn’s current lawyer told BBC News that his client had fully co-operated with the FBI’s requests. Kahn asked staff at Epstein’s New York mansion to remove items from a safe, according to the FBI Kahn, and Epstein’s long-serving lawyer Darren Indyke, are the sole executors of Epstein’s estate, controlling all his wealth and possessions. Although hardly household names, the pair now hold control over compensation owed to survivors and the secrets contained in the documents still held by the Epstein estate – which, upon request, have been released to the House Oversight Committee. As part of its investigation into Epstein’s network, the congressional committee has subpoenaed – summoned – the pair to testify. Kahn is appearing on Wednesday 11 March, while Indyke is due to testify on Thursday 19 March. We have spoken to people associated with investigations linked to Epstein, looked through papers from multiple court cases, and analysed the most recent material released in the Epstein files by the US Department of Justice – to try to uncover more about the role the two men are alleged to have played in Epstein’s life and continue to play after his death. Epstein appointed Indyke and Kahn as co-executors in August 2019, just two days before he died in jail awaiting trial for sex-trafficking minors. He revised his will to transfer all his wealth into a trust named after the year of his birth, which the lawyer and accountant would administer. In their role as executors, Indyke and Kahn have agreed compensation packages paid to survivors and included conditions that prevented survivors who accepted funds from taking further legal action against them personally. Other claims are still outstanding. As beneficiaries of the trust, the men could also be paid tens of millions of dollars each from whatever remains when the claims are settled. Court filings claim that, either Indyke and Kahn – but often both of them – “had signatory authority over virtually all of the accounts held by Epstein”, which meant they were authorised to make transactions. They also helped to run multiple Epstein corporations – some of which, it is alleged in court filings, existed solely for the purpose of his sex-trafficking operation. Kahn’s lawyer told us “there is no basis for such claims” and that Epstein’s businesses didn’t operate to shield his activities; “virtually all of them were tax-filing entities whose ownership was never hidden”.

Sabine Mc Neill, who was imprisoned for 4 years after she thought she had uncovered a child abuse ring, still thinks she was right. Wealthy parents accused of starting sex cult with kids in wild conspiracy theory The conspiracy theory surrounding the cult wasn’t conjured up on some dark corner of the internet, but rather by a middle-class mother whose children attended the school in Hampstead, north-west London Ella Draper, who ‘tortured’ her two young children into making false claims that their father was the leader of a Satanic sex abuse cult Parents and teachers from a wealthy area in west London were accused of running a Satanist sex cult with children and drinking their blood in a wild conspiracy theory, it has been revealed in a podcast. The names, numbers and addresses of those who allegedly sexually abused and killed children before drinking their blood were published online alongside the vile accusations for all to see. It didn’t take long for those accusations surrounding the ‘cult’ allegedly based at Christchurch Primary School in Hampstead, north-west London, to attract attention from online conspiracy theorists. The accusations even saw dozens of angry protesters travel to the primary school, shouting “paedophile” and “murderers” at teachers and parents, the Star reports. The conspiracy theory wasn’t conjured up on some dark corner of the internet, but rather by a middle-class mother whose children attended the school. In 2014 Ella Draper, now 49, was embroiled in an ugly custody battle with her second husband. In July that year, Ella and her new man Abraham Christie claimed the children had made a series of horrifying allegations regarding their father, other parents and teachers from the school. In interviews to the police, the children detailed a Satanic paedophile ring, tales of murdered babies and dark sacrifices. However, there was no evidence of the cult and in September 2014 the children told police they’d been pressured by Ella and Abraham to make the allegations. The investigation was closed. Then, Ella chose to represent herself in the family courts for the custody case, meaning she got access to evidence including videos of the children’s police interviews. She handed the evidence to Sabine McNeill, now 77, an informal legal advisor who had previously accused family courts of stealing hundreds of children away from their families. In January 2015, Sabine uploaded Ella’s confidential material – including the interviews and home videos of the children alleging satanic abuse – to the internet, with the mother’s blessing. She also published an 11-page document titled Mass Child Sex Abuse In Satanic Ritual Abuse And Sacrifice Cult, outlining allegations against 175 people alongside their personal details. Given that this happened during the ongoing custody case, police were sent to Ella’s house to get an explanation. Writing in the Daily Mail, podcast host Alexi explained: “After stalling, Ella ran into her back garden, climbed over the fence into the neighbouring property — and then over three more fences — to the street. “The next day she fled to Spain, with Abraham following a day later. She hasn’t been back to the UK since.”…

Beyond Epstein? Joan Coleman’s 2005 list of Child Ritual Abusers and their enablers in the UK? Alex Thomson gives a list of UK child sex abusers from the RAINS list (Ritual Abuse Information Network and Support) A Beacon for Survivors of Ritual Abuse The R.A.I.N.S. List, an acronym for Ritual Abuse Information Network & Support, is a significant resource in the fight against ritual abuse. Created by Dr. Joan Coleman, a renowned expert in the field, this list serves as a crucial tool for survivors, advocates, and mental health professionals. Let’s explore the importance of the R.A.I.N.S. List and its impact on the community. The Origins of the R.A.I.N.S. List Dr. Joan Coleman, who dedicated her career to understanding and addressing ritual abuse, established the R.A.I.N.S. List to provide a network of support for survivors. The list was designed to connect individuals with essential information, resources, and a community that understands their experiences1. Dr. Coleman’s work has been instrumental in shedding light on the dark and often hidden world of ritual abuse. The Significance of Ritual Abuse Ritual abuse involves systematic and organized abuse, often associated with religious, cultic, or spiritual practices. Survivors of ritual abuse face unique challenges, including physical, psychological, and emotional trauma. The manipulation and control exerted by abusers can leave lasting scars, making recovery a long and arduous journey. The Role of the R.A.I.N.S. List The R.A.I.N.S. List serves multiple purposes: Information Hub: It provides comprehensive information about ritual abuse, helping survivors and professionals understand the complexities of this form of abuse. Support Network: The list connects survivors with support groups and mental health professionals who specialize in ritual abuse, offering a sense of community and understanding. Advocacy and Awareness: By raising awareness about ritual abuse, the R.A.I.N.S. List plays a crucial role in advocating for survivors and pushing for societal and legal changes to protect vulnerable individuals2. The Impact on Survivors For many survivors, the R.A.I.N.S. List is a lifeline. It offers validation and support, helping them feel less isolated in their experiences. The list also empowers survivors by providing them with the tools and resources needed to navigate their recovery journey. Dr. Coleman’s compassionate approach and extensive knowledge have made a profound difference in the lives of many1. Moving Forward The legacy of Dr. Joan Coleman and the R.A.I.N.S. List continues to inspire and support those affected by ritual abuse. As awareness grows, it is essential to continue advocating for survivors and ensuring they have access to the resources and support they need. By fostering a community of understanding and resilience, we can help survivors reclaim their lives and move towards healing. In conclusion, the R.A.I.N.S. List is more than just a resource; it is a beacon of hope for those who have endured the unimaginable. Through continued support and advocacy, we can honor Dr. Coleman’s legacy and make a meaningful difference in the lives of survivors.. 

Sabine, who used to be part of monetary reform groups, gives her opinion on the likelihood of a banking collapse due to Iran war.

Chancellor Rachel Reeves takes on UK energy monopoly price fixing, profiteering or ‘gouging’ on how she’s going to deal with oil price rising. Energy companies ripping off consumers.  How latest rise in oil prices will affect cost of petrol and inflation Rising petrol, energy bills, food shop and mortgages- how the Iran war trickles down into your wallet As the Iran war continues to escalate, all eyes are on the price of oil as fears mount over a global energy crisis. Brent prices spiked earlier this week, reaching almost $120 per barrel, and are currently around 40 per cent higher than they were when the first strikes on Iran were launched by Israel and the US at the start of the month. In retaliation, Iran kept its stranglehold on shipping through the Strait of Hormuz, the strategic waterway through which a fifth of the world’s oil transits on its way from the Persian Gulf to the open seas, crippling oil prices. So how does this affect you? Oil prices, benchmarked globally by Brent crude from the North Sea, fluctuate based on supply and demand. The longer that the price of oil is high, the more difficult it is to absorb those spikes, making it more likely people will feel the cost at home. Beyond higher heating bills, rising oil costs increase manufacturing and transport expenses, inflating the prices of food and most other goods and services. “You never know exactly the timeframe of this, but, in the worst case, this is a weeks, not a months thing,” US energy secretary Chris Wright said earlier this week. But the longer it goes on, the more likely it is that prices remain higher afterwards. Here is what will be affected by the ongoing conflict: Petrol Iran has cut its oil output drastically, now only producing a quarter of what it was before the first US strikes fell. “This is roughly 3 per cent of global oil supply lost in a single event. Shockingly, this is worse than the oil supply situation after Russia attacked Ukraine,” noted XTB research director Kathleen Brooks. Petrol prices in the UK have been rising since the conflict in the Middle East started, up between 4p and 8p to hit their highest in nearly 20 months. The RAC said diesel prices had risen by nearly 9 per cent since 28 February. Petrol prices were on average 6 per cent more across the same period. The government has said drivers can compare prices at different petrol stations across the UK through its fuel finder scheme, which has also been welcomed by the AA. The cost of heating oil has already doubled, which affects customers using home heating oil, as it is not covered by Ofgem’s energy price cap. Inflation and interest rates While we don’t know the figures just yet, we do know that if costs of energy, raw materials and labour go up, prices go up in response- this is inflation. If prices start to surge again, one of the key measures the Bank of England has to control inflation is to raise interest rates. “Markets are already pricing in the unwelcome return of uncomfortable levels of inflation, with bond yields rising significantly and investors eyeing the UK as particularly sensitive to an energy shock,” Danni Hewson, head of financial analysis at AJ Bell, said. “Preventing inflation from spiralling once again will be at the forefront of rate setters’ minds when they sit down to rewrite the Bank’s playbook next week. “The key consideration will be the duration of the conflict, and whether it ends decisively or if attacks on shipping and energy infrastructure continue beyond any declaration of victory by the US president.” Mortgages The interest rate going up means you pay more on the amount you’ve borrowed, if you don’t have a fixed deal. Some lenders have now raised their rates on new fixed-term mortgages. NatWest, TSB, HSBC, Nationwide, Santander, the Co-operative Bank and Skipton Building Society are among those to have done so in the past week or so. Typically, mortgage deals on the market don’t change in direct line with the Bank of England base rate, they move up and down in anticipation of what might happen in future – with the swap rates, as they are termed. Up until recently, mortgage prices had been headed downwards, but with this new threat to a possible rise in interest rates, swap rates have edged up.

Farage and Reform support the war. Farage criticising Starmer for sending HMS Dragon so late etc.

Trump on how he thinks war with Iran is going.

Can Iran beat Israel or will such a war inevitably ‘go nuclear’? Could Israel use nuclear weapons against Iran? The Samson option explained The Middle East has never seen nuclear weapons used. But Israel’s so-called Samson option could disrupt the most fragile deterrence balances in the world. Could Israel use nuclear weapons against Iran? Inside the Samson option The Shavit is a three-stage, solid-fueled rocket that was based on the design of the Jericho 2 ballistic missile. Escalating tensions between Israel and Iran have revived concerns about a scenario once considered almost unthinkable. The possible use of nuclear weapons in the Middle East. Although nuclear weapons have never been used in the region, the strategic concerns surrounding Israel’s undeclared nuclear arsenal and Iran’s nuclear ambitions have long been a central issue in regional security debates. Experts stress that the likelihood of nuclear use remains extremely low, largely because nuclear weapons function primarily as deterrents. Yet the existence of such weapons and the opacity surrounding them mean the possibility cannot be entirely dismissed, especially during periods of heightened conflict. According to a recent report by the South China Morning Post (SCMP), the renewed hostilities in the Middle East have once again drawn attention to Israel’s widely suspected nuclear arsenal and the risks associated with it. Alicia Sanders-Zakre, head of policy at the Geneva-based International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons (ICAN), noted that “it is widely acknowledged among experts that Israel is a nuclear-armed country, but this has never been formally acknowledged by Israel or by the United States.” She warned that the existence of such weapons itself poses dangers, adding that “as long as a country possesses a nuclear arsenal, there’s a risk that nuclear weapons might be used intentionally or accidentally.” Israel’s undeclared nuclear capability Israel has never officially acknowledged possessing nuclear weapons, maintaining a long-standing policy known as “nuclear ambiguity.” Under this approach, Israeli leaders neither confirm nor deny the existence of a nuclear arsenal, a strategy designed to deter adversaries without formally declaring nuclear status. According to the Nuclear Threat Initiative, Israel has likely possessed nuclear weapons since the late 1960s while continuing to avoid official confirmation. Independent research institutes estimate the size of Israel’s arsenal based on available intelligence and historical records. The Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) estimates that Israel holds roughly 80 nuclear weapons, making it one of the smaller nuclear arsenals globally. Similarly, the Arms Control Association estimates Israel has about 90 nuclear warheads, with enough fissile material potentially available for around 200 more weapons. While details remain secret, analysts believe Israel’s nuclear forces are designed for multiple delivery methods. SIPRI assessments indicate that some warheads could be delivered by aircraft, while others are believed to be assigned to the Jericho series of ballistic missiles, which are capable of striking targets thousands of kilometers away.

Trump in Ohio with his latest update on war ‘going very well’. C4 News – Mohammed Marandi giving Iran’s point of view. Trump refers to Iran conflict as ‘a little excursion’ Donald Trump called the war in Iran an “excursion” that will keep the US “out of a war” during a visit to a facility in Cincinnati on Wednesday (11 March). It comes on the same day the president declared the US has “won” the war in Iran but needs to “finish the job,” claiming that the US destroyed Iran’s navy and air force in a matter of hours. As a reporter asked, “You just said it is a little excursion and often—you said it is a war. So which one is it?” the Republican replied: “Well, it’s both. It’s both. It’s an excursion that will keep us out of a war. And the war is going to be, I mean, for them, it’s a war, for us it’s turned out to be easier than we thought.”

Videos of full shows – Essentials: Michael Hudson | Blackrock/Vanguard | Netanyahu at the 7/7 London Bombings | Why/how Israel Assassinated JFK & RFK | Operation Gladio | Tony on Brexit & (4th Reich) Traitors of Arnhem | Creation vs. Evolution | God vs. Lucifer | ‘Great Plan’ for 3 World Wars | Devil Worship: The Rise Of Satanism | Nuclear Armed IDF Doomsday Cult | Aanirfan | Armageddonists I have known: Nick Land (1976-8) | George Monbiot (1995-7) | Manna for the Revelation Generation: CONSPIRACY CLASSICS, longer interviews/lectures

Part Two – International news review, Accelerationist, Armageddonist reports and investigations

What’s wrong with mainstream media? Everyone’s got an angle. Peter Oborne on war in Iran – Farage supports war but may mean more boat people – Israel has loads of nuclear weapons and Iran has none. The British media think you’re an idiot. They are trying to convince you that a foreign war on behalf of Israel is in your interests. It’s time to expose the propagandists and the wararmongers. The first casualty of war is truth. They’re trying to tell you that this war is a defensive war. A blind man walking down the street can see that this is pure nonsense. It’s a war of aggression, the ultimate crime. These lies just don’t stop. We saw it in Iraq with Tony Blair’s lies about weapons of mass destruction. We saw it in the destruction of Gaza and now we’re seeing it in Iran, setting the entire Middle East and quite likely the world on fire. So on day one, shortly after the assassination of Ayatahi, a girl school that was attacked, it seems there are about 175 killed, 100 more injured. The following day, I picked up the Sunday papers. one of them as a Sunday telegraph. I’ve been through it several times. There’s no mention of that at all. Imagine if 165 Israelis had been killed in a bomb from Iran. It would have been the story on the front. It would have been covered everywhere. But the death of 165 young girls is just of no consequence at all. So I know the editor of the Sunday Telegraph, Alistister Heath. I sent him an email saying, you know, why didn’t you cover this tragedy in the girl school? I’ve not received a reply. And then I read his leader on the Telegraph. The Iranian regime is built on an Islamist doctrine which cannot meaningfully be negotiated with. It’s simply untrue. The Iranians do negotiate and they can absolutely be trusted as they stick to their promises. That was proven when Obama negotiated the JCPOA nuclear deal with Iran in 2015. They stuck to it completely religiously until Trump walked away from it. And we know from the Omani foreign minister. What has Iran agreed to is the agreement that Iran will never ever have a nuclear material that will create a bomb. So there will be zero accumulation, zero stockpiling and full verification. Even United States inspectors will have access. Iranians were negotiating really hard to avoid a war. They’d actually offered a better deal than they had signed off on in 2015. That was on the table. And that, of course, is when America and Israel struck.

Nuclear escalation in Iran war? Netanyahu on why the wars Israel has inflicted on it’s neighbours are justified.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Htd2oAtWiR4

Al Jazeera – UN Security Council. UN Security Council condemns Iran attacks on Gulf without mentioning US and Israel Iran says resolution is ‘blatant misuse’ of Security Council, as Russian draft calling for all sides to de-escalate is rejected The UN Security Council has voted to call for an end to Iranian attacks on the Gulf, in a resolution that did not mention US or Israeli attacks on Iran, prompting strong criticism from Tehran’s ambassador. Beijing said that the US and Israel launched strikes without Security Council authorisation and must cease their actions immediately. While stressing that the sovereignty and security of Gulf states must be respected, Fu Cong, China’s representative, said the text “does not fully reflect the root cause and overall picture of the conflict in a balanced manner”. Vasily Nebenzya, Moscow’s representative, said the resolution was “biased and one-sided”. “The Council’s adoption could be interpreted by bad-faith actors, and first and foremost by those who started this war, to continue their acts of aggression against Iran,” he warned. The resolution was tabled by Iran’s Gulf neighbour Bahrain and sponsored by 135 countries. It demanded “the immediate cessation of all attacks by the Islamic Republic of Iran against Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, and Jordan”. It also condemned actions or threats by Iran “aimed at closing, obstructing, or otherwise interfering with international navigation through the Strait of Hormuz”. The resolution was passed by 13 votes to none against, with Russia and China abstaining. A second draft tabled by Russia, which called on all sides to cease hostilities, was rejected. Jamal Fares Alrowaiei, Bahrain’s UN envoy, said the vote reflected the Gulf’s key role in the global economy. “This is why ensuring the security of this region is not merely a regional matter, it is a common international responsibility that is closely linked to the stability of the global economy and energy security,” he told the Security Council. Amir Saeid Iravani, Iran’s ambassador to the UN, said the adoption of the text was a “blatant misuse” of the Security Council that leaves “a lasting stain on its record”. “Let me make it clear: this resolution is a manifest injustice against my country, the main victim of a clear act of aggression,” he said. ‘Biased and one-sided’ The war began on 28 February after the US and Israel launched strikes across Iran, killing Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, senior officials and many civilians. Iran has responded by launching drone and missile attacks on Israel, as well as every country in the Gulf. “Iran’s strategy of sowing chaos, of trying to hold their neighbours hostage, trying to shake the resolve of the region, has clearly backfired, as shown by this vote today,” said the US ambassador to the UN, Mike Waltz.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Htd2oAtWiR4

EXCLUSIVE Former UK Ambassador to Bahrain and Syria Peter Ford – Iran didn’t need nuclear power. Economic crash? UK has poor energy stores. But war will not last more than a few weeks…

MP3 of Friday 6th March 2026 show [right click to download] (from c. 11pm) This week’s full interview mp3s, bottom of page. SHOW STARTS 17:00 London time FOR c. 3½ HRS TO c. 20:30 – OUR LIVE STREAM to Listen live online. Alt. live stream, DJ Plug Radio OR Download Show After Transmission HERE. Repeats 11 & 5 AM & PM daily on our stream
Download NOT THE BCFM POLITICS SHOW APP [ANDROID APP (1)] Alternatives [GITHUB (2)] and [APKPURE (3)] – or the [Apple App store] – PS. You can replace evil Google Play, which banned us, with [the Aurora store]
Only 31% trust the UK Press! – UK media oligopoly TONY’S BOOKS: Bilderberg.org – 2 PAPER–BACKS – TONY’S CHANNELS: Telegram – Bitchute – 911 forum – Radio4All – The Land Is Ours – VK – Twitter/X – Farcebook – Brighteon – Rumble – RT Live on Rumble –  Goebbelsesque YouTube: This show; Public Enquiry; Peter Borenius; i-Contact & Occult Geopolitics

Radio4All mp3 audio files usually available from 23:00 2-4hrs, after TX – we’ll credit you if you rebroadcast. Any probs. mp3s should be on alternative links below by then

Part One – Local and National News Review

US launches War Three on Iran for Israel. UK reluctant to get involved. BBC announces WW3 on Saturday. Trump wants Iranians to rise up and take government. Neither pre-emptive nor legal, US-Israeli strikes on Iran have blown up international law The joint US-Israeli strikes on Iran represent a further erosion of the international legal order. Under international law, these attacks are neither preemptive nor lawful. Israel and the United States launched Operation Shield of Judah and Operation Epic Fury while diplomatic negotiations between Washington and Tehran were actively underway on Iran’s nuclear program. Just two days earlier, the most intense round of US-Iran talks concluded in Geneva, with both sides agreeing to continue. US President Donald Trump indicated he would give negotiators more time. Then came the bombs. The illegality of the attack Israel said the strikes were “preventive”, meaning they were to prevent Iran from developing a capacity to be a threat. But preventive war has no legal basis under international law. The UN Security Council did not authorise any military action, meaning the sole lawful pathway for the use of force for self-defence was never pursued. Article 2(4) of the UN Charter prohibits the use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state. Preemptive self-defence, as we have argued previously, has extremely narrow prescriptions under the Caroline doctrine. It requires a threat to be “instant, overwhelming, and leaving no choice of means”. No such conditions existed with Iran on February 28. Central to the current crisis is that it was Trump who ended the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) in 2018, which had regional support for controlling Iran’s nuclear program. The US director of national intelligence testified in March 2025 that Iran was not pursuing nuclear weapons, which the head of the International Atomic Energy Agency affirmed. US intelligence also reportedly indicated it would take three years for Iran to build a nuclear weapon. Moreover, US and Israeli strikes on Iran last year had put the program back by months. Trump claimed Iran’s nuclear program had been obliterated. Regime change by force is unlawful Trump said the attacks were intended to end Iran’s nuclear weapons program and bring about regime change. Trump urged Iranians to “take over your government”, while Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu declared the goal was to “remove the existential threat posed by the terrorist regime in Iran”. Forcible regime change violates the foundational principles of state sovereignty and non-intervention under the UN Charter. The strikes targeted Iran’s supreme leader, president, and military chief of staff, as well as military infrastructure. Deliberately targeting heads of state also crosses a threshold that distinguishes military operations from acts of aggression. Attacking heads of state is illegal under New York Convention, for obvious reasons of stability. With the death of Iran’s supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, the power vacuum will only increase the hardship on the ground for Iranians. In addition, promises to return the shah – Iran’s previous monarch – have not considered the authoritarian implications of such rule. Reports that an airstrike on an elementary school in Minab killed at least 100 girls aged between seven and 12 underscore the human cost of unplanned regime change. US and Israeli statements imply that regime change is prioritised over any plans of a replacement. But just like the aftermath of the death of Libyan leader Muammar Qaddafi that saw slavery return to Libya, or how Islamic State filled the power vacuum after the death of dictator Saddam Hussein in Iraq, regime change requires extremely careful planning. In this case, there is no obvious plan to rebuild or stabilise Iran after these strikes. Western allies have expressed concern that Washington lacks a coherent strategy for the aftermath of the attacks, noting the minimal preparation for post-conflict reconstruction and government transition. As Mexico’s representative stated at the UN Security Council following recent US actions in Venezuela, the historical record of regime change shows it has only “exacerbated conflicts and weakened the social and political fabric of nations”. According to The Atlantic, “complete chaos” is likely. Diplomacy as deception Launching strikes during active negotiations violates the principle of good faith in Article 2(2) of the UN Charter. As the Arms Control Association noted, Iranian policymakers had already accused the US of bad faith after the June 2025 strikes disrupted previously scheduled talks. Iran’s Foreign Ministry denounced the February 28 attacks as striking during negotiations, violating international law.

Snipers at Iranian protests in January – Russians told Iran who they were. Iran launches global push to expose terrorist plot behind riots Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi has called on Iranian envoys to present an accurate account of the terrorist nature of recent attacks against the country’s security and territorial integrity to the international community. Speaking during a webinar on Tuesday with ambassadors and heads of Iran’s diplomatic missions in Eastern European countries, Araghchi reviewed recent domestic and international developments. During the session, Araghchi highlighted the role of law enforcement and security forces in maintaining public order following the recent riots. Foreign-backed armed rioters and terrorists hijacked peaceful, sporadic protests over economic grievances on January 8 and 9. The violence, encouraged openly by the US and the Israeli regime, resulted in extensive damage to public and private property, with widespread destruction of shops, government institutions, public service facilities, and the killing of hundreds of civilians and security forces. Iranian authorities have confirmed that American and Israeli spy agencies were directly involved, providing funding, training, and media support to rioters and armed terrorists acting on the streets. Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Baghaei has accused Israeli media of orchestrating a campaign of fabricated stories regarding casualties in recent terrorist riots in Iran. The Iranian minister also criticized foreign interference in Iran’s internal affairs and characterized recent attacks as part of broader efforts to undermine the country’s security. Araghchi further commented on recent developments at the UN Human Rights Council, stating that negative and abstention votes on an Iran-related resolution reflected a lack of consensus around Western double standards. The UNHRC adopted a resolution that extended the mandate of the so-called Independent Fact-Finding Mission on Iran for two years, and the mandate of the Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in Iran for one year. The resolution also called for an urgent investigation by the Fact-Finding Mission, in the context of what it claimed to be crackdown in Iran. The resolution was adopted by a vote of 25 in favor, seven against, and 14 abstentions. “Iran’s diplomatic missions must convey to the international community an accurate and realistic picture of the terrorist nature of the recent attacks against the country’s security and territorial integrity,” Araghchi said. The meeting also focused on various aspects of Iran’s relations with Eastern European states, the provision of consular services to Iranian nationals living in the region, and an assessment of current internal and external developments affecting the country. Ambassadors and heads of missions participating in the webinar also presented reports on steps taken to enhance bilateral relations with Eastern European countries across various sectors.

USS Abraham Lincoln aircraft carrier hit by Iran missile. Trump’s speech on why he has to have war with Iran. USS Abraham Lincoln Forced to “Flee” Indian Ocean Flashpoint After IRGC Fires Four Cruise Missiles — Global (DEFENCE SECURITY ASIA) — The withdrawal of the USS Abraham Lincoln to the southeast Indian Ocean following a four-cruise-missile engagement by the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps Navy represents a consequential inflection point in maritime power projection, directly challenging long-standing assumptions regarding carrier strike group survivability inside contested anti-access and area-denial envelopes. Naval history books IRGC spokesman General Sardar Nainini explicitly confirmed that the carrier, positioned approximately 250 to 300 kilometres off Iran’s strategic Chabahar coast, was targeted by four cruise missiles before altering course and retreating, declaring that “the USS Abraham Lincoln fled to the southeast of the Indian Ocean,” thereby framing the incident as both operational success and strategic deterrent signalling. The episode introduces immediate global ramifications for naval force posture doctrine, carrier strike group logistics footprint management, and Indo-Pacific maritime security calculations, as the repositioning of a U.S. nuclear-powered supercarrier away from Iranian littoral waters reshapes the balance of deterrence credibility across the Gulf of Oman and western Indian Ocean. Iran The launching of Iran’s cruise missileCruise missile defense The USS Abraham Lincoln, a Nimitz-class aircraft carrier valued at approximately USD 4.5 billion (RM17.1 billion) excluding embarked air wing and escort vessels, had maintained a standoff posture near Chabahar that placed it squarely within the effective range of Iran’s coastal cruise missile architecture. General Sardar Nainini’s public confirmation of the carrier’s retreat introduced information warfare dynamics into the operational theatre, transforming what might have remained a contested tactical engagement into a strategic narrative battle with implications for global naval doctrine and allied reassurance credibility. Four Cruise Missiles and the 250–300 Kilometre Engagement Envelope The engagement occurred while the USS Abraham Lincoln operated within a 250–300 kilometre corridor off Chabahar, a distance that placed the carrier inside an actionable anti-ship cruise missile threat envelope consistent with Iran’s layered coastal defence posture. The firing of four cruise missiles from IRGC naval elements demonstrated a coordinated targeting and launch sequence that required integrated coastal surveillance, fire-control alignment, and real-time maritime domain awareness sufficient to track and prosecute a moving high-value naval target.Missile technology reports Cruise missiles, optimised for sea-skimming terminal profiles and radar cross-section minimisation, are specifically engineered to exploit vulnerabilities in layered naval air defence screens, forcing carrier strike groups to activate electronic warfare suites, interceptor assets, and evasive manoeuvre protocols simultaneously. General Sardar Nainini’s statement did not detail impact confirmation, damage assessment, or interception outcomes, creating an operational ambiguity that defence planners must interpret cautiously while recognising the strategic signalling embedded in the missile launch itself. The decision of the USS Abraham Lincoln to alter course following the missile firing indicates that the carrier command team assessed the threat envelope as sufficiently credible to justify immediate geographic displacement rather than sustained station-keeping. Operating within 250–300 kilometres of Chabahar inherently compresses reaction timelines for carrier-based air operations, as coastal missile batteries positioned along Iran’s Gulf of Oman frontage can exploit interior lines of communication and shorter sensor-to-shooter cycles.Naval power comparisons

Judge Neapolitano – brilliant as ever  Mohammed Marandi – strikes on Tehran take out State TV – and Supreme Leader. Netanyahu fled to Berlin.

David Hearst, Editor of Middle East Eye, on war being part of plan for a Greater Israel, and India supporting Israel. Centcom based in Qatar. US airbases reduced to rubble.  Netanyahu now preparing for India to replace the US as its main funder! Iran’s decision not to have fought back stronger sooner in 2024 when the Gaza genocide began may be fatal for their nation. Israelis are now courting Modi’s India knowing that the United States may withdraw support when they see they’ve been betrayed. Israel’s war of regional supremacy will not end with Iran | David Hearst Middle East Eye David Hearst, editor in chief of Middle East Eye, says that the US and Israeli strike that killed Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and much of the country’s leadership marks the start of a war aimed not at Iran’s nuclear programme, but at regime change. He says Iran had just made what Oman described as a “substantial offer” in negotiations with Washington to dilute its stock of highly enriched uranium, yet the talks served as cover for what he describes as a pre planned decapitation strike. Hearst says Donald Trump and Benjamin Netanyahu immediately appealed to Iranians to rise up against their government, but the crowds that gathered were largely mourning the dead. From the outset, he adds, it was clear the objective was to dismantle the Iranian state itself, targeting the entire political elite and seeking to turn Iran into “a weak, pliant confederation of ethnic cantons”. He says that weakening Iran is central to a broader Israeli project increasingly described as “Greater Israel”, the idea that Israeli power should extend across the region. Netanyahu, Hearst writes, sees this moment as an opportunity to crush Iran and expand Israel’s military and technological dominance in the Middle East. Iran has responded by widening the conflict, closing the Strait of Hormuz and striking economic and military targets across the Gulf. Hearst says Tehran is seeking to make the costs of the war global, raising energy prices and threatening key infrastructure in order to internationalise the conflict. He concludes that the war could either break the Iranian state or trigger a renewed revolutionary mobilisation, but warns that the stakes go far beyond Iran itself. The outcome, he says, could reshape the map of the Middle East and determine whether Israel can redraw the region’s balance of power in its favour.

False flag drone attack on Cyprus base.And on Turkey as well as Azerbaijan and Qatar. Israel desperate to drag Gulf states into Trumps war. False Flags: Iran denies responsibility for missile strikes on Azerbaijan, Oman, Turkey and Cyprus – If not Tehran, then who is behind these attacks? Drone and missile incidents reported across Azerbaijan, Oman, Turkey and Cyprus amid Iran conflict. Tehran denies involvement, calling some attacks “false flag,” while rising tensions raise regional security concerns. Tensions in the Middle East appear to be spreading beyond the main battlefield as several countries report mysterious drone and missile incidents. Since the conflict involving the United States, Israel and Iran intensified, reports of explosions, intercepted drones and suspected missile launches have surfaced across multiple regions. From the Caucasus to the Mediterranean, governments are investigating unusual security incidents, but in many cases the exact source of the attacks remains unclear. Iran has strongly rejected several accusations and claims that some incidents may be “false flag” operations meant to increase pressure on Tehran. Azerbaijan: Drone Incident Near Airport Raises Questions Iran’s armed forces general staff released a statement saying that no Iranian drone had been sent toward Azerbaijan. Tehran emphasized that it respects Azerbaijan’s sovereignty and has no intention of targeting its territory. Iran also suggested that the incident could be part of an attempt to damage relations between Muslim countries. Iranian officials hinted that outside forces may be trying to create mistrust in the region. Oman: Intercepted Drones but No Clear Source Iranian officials described Oman as a “friendly and neighboring country” and insisted that Iran had not launched any attack toward Omani territory. Turkey: Missile Intercepted by NATO Defence System Some signals from Turkish sources suggested that Iran could be responsible. However, on March 5 Iranian authorities firmly rejected the allegation. Tehran stated that it had not launched any missile toward Turkey and repeated that it respects Turkey’s sovereignty. Cyprus: Drone Strike Near British Airbase Another controversial incident took place on March 2 in Cyprus, where a drone attack was reported near the British Royal Air Force base in Akrotiri. Early speculation linked the drone to Iran or Iran-backed groups. Iran denied any involvement and suggested the possibility of a “false flag” operation. Tehran said such attacks might be carried out deliberately to blame Iran and increase hostility in the region. Interestingly, Britain’s defence ministry later said that the drone was not launched from Iran. This has left investigators searching for the real source.

Operation Epstein Fury – Trump with 14 year old Jane. Damning Epstein files with claims against Trump released during Iran war by US Justice Department Documents summarise interviews with an unidentified woman making accusations against US president over an alleged sexual encounter when she was aged between 13 and 15. The United States Justice Department has published additional FBI documents, describing interviews with a woman who said President Donald Trump sexually assaulted her when she was a teenager after she was introduced to him by late convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. The documents had not been made public under previous congressionally mandated file releases related to Epstein, the disgraced financier, because they were mistakenly marked “duplicative”, the department said on Thursday. The documents released on Thursday include descriptions of multiple 2019 interviews the FBI held with the woman, who alleged she was assaulted by Epstein and Trump while she was aged between 13 and 15 years old. In one interview, the woman said Epstein took her to “either New York or New Jersey” and introduced her to Trump. She told investigators that she bit Trump as he attempted to force her to perform oral sex on him. The woman said she and people close to her received threatening calls over the years demanding she keep quiet, which she believed were related to Epstein. Interviews stopped FBI records reportedly suggest agents stopped speaking with her in 2019. In the report of the woman’s final interview, conducted in October 2019, during Trump’s first presidency, agents asked whether she would be willing to provide more information about Trump. In response, the agent wrote, she “asked what the point would be of providing the information at this point in her life when there was a strong possibility nothing could be done about it”. Advertisement Politico, the US publication which first reported the disclosures, said White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt called the woman’s claims “completely baseless accusations, backed by zero credible evidence”. Trump has denied any wrongdoing related to the Epstein allegations, and the Justice Department previously said some of the documents it has released “contain untrue and sensationalist claims against President Trump”. Before the US and Israel launched their war on Iran five days ago, the fallout from files released by the US Department of Justice on the convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein was reverberating around the world. Want to come back to this article? Save it for later. But all those revelations have sharply shifted once the bombs started raining down on Iran. On Sunday, Republican US Congressman Thomas Massie, who helped push the passage of the Epstein Files Transparency Act through Congress last year, said, “bombing a country on the other side of the globe won’t make the Epstein files go away”. He has also been critical of the war. Shaiel Ben-Ephraim, an analyst with Atlas Global Strategies and a former Israeli diplomat, has told Al Jazeera that Trump “really needs a distraction from [his domestic issues] in the form of a war”.

Mark Carney is being positioned as ‘moderate’ – Bilderberg plan?

ECONOMIC DISASTER: Strait of Hormuz shut – 300 tankers plus container ships stuck oil prices going up. Strait of Hormuz crisis: 700 tankers pile up as security fears paralyse shipping amid US–Iran escalation, says report As tensions rise following US-Israeli strikes on Iran, over 700 tankers are stranded in the Strait of Hormuz, a critical oil transit route. Shipping activities have plummeted, leading to soaring insurance costs and potential supply shortages, prompting Asian refiners to consider cutting operations. As of today, 706 non-Iranian tankers are waiting on either side of the strait, the agency said on 2 March. Of these, 334 crude oil tankers, 109 vessels carrying dirty petroleum products and 263 transporting clean petroleum products are positioned at various points across the Persian Gulf (west of the strait), the Gulf of Oman (east of the strait) and the Arabian Sea Oil tanker traffic through the Strait of Hormuz has declined as security risks have increased amid escalating tensions in West Asia after the US-Israel strikes on Iran and its retaliatory onslaught in the region. Shipping activities have almost halted due to a conflict involving more than 700 ships gathered on both sides of the strategic route, according to a report by the Turkish news agency Anadolu. Located at the mouth of the Persian Gulf, the Strait of Hormuz connects West Asia’s oil and liquefied natural gas production to global markets through the Gulf of Oman and the Indian Ocean. About 20% of the world’s daily oil consumption, or about 20 million barrels, passes through this strategic corridor. Following the joint attack by the United States (US) and Israel on Iran at the weekend, ship operators halted crossings amid soaring insurance costs. International news agencies have quoted an analysis by the instant data company Kpler, saying that as many as 21 million barrels of oil were transported by 15 tankers on 27 February, rising to 21.6 million barrels by 18 ships on Saturday. However, on 1 March, only three tankers carrying 2.8 million barrels crossed the strait, the agencies said. With an average daily flow throughout the year of 19.8 million barrels, shipments on 1 March recorded an 86% decline from the average in 2026, Anadolu reported. As of today, 706 non-Iranian tankers are waiting on either side of the strait, the agency said on 2 March. Of these, 334 crude oil tankers, 109 vessels carrying dirty petroleum products and 263 transporting clean petroleum products are positioned at various points across the Persian Gulf (west of the strait), the Gulf of Oman (east of the strait) and the Arabian Sea, it said. Is the Strait of Hormuz shut? Ever since the joint US-Israeli strikes on Iran that began over the weekend, there have been reports alleging that the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps had sent messages to ships intending to use the Strait of Hormuz stating that “no vessels will be permitted to pass.” Some reports suggested that these warnings were broadcast to ship crews operating in the Persian Gulf via the international hailing and distress frequency VHF Channel 16, yet no official statement has been issued confirming a formal closure of the chokepoint. Iranian media have claimed that the Strait of Hormuz has been effectively shut. United Kingdom Maritime Trade Operations (UKMTO) said in a statement on Sunday that the maritime security level for the Strait of Hormuz had been raised to “critical”, the highest risk category.

Russia’s Sergei Lavrov – Iran had no nuclear bomb capability. Sergey Lavrov Accuses U.S. and Israel of Dragging Iran into a Wider Conflict with Gulf Countries Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov has accused the United States and Israel of seeking to disrupt relations between Iran and its Arab neighbors in the Persian Gulf, amid the ongoing Middle East conflict. Speaking during the Russian Foreign Ministry briefing roundtable in Moscow diplomatic forum on March 5, 2026, Lavrov criticised the U.S.-Israeli military offensive against Iran. “I have no doubt that one of the goals was to create a split between the countries of the Persian Gulf, Iran, and its Arab neighbors, between which there has been a positive process of normalization in recent years. First of all, this was noticeable when Saudi Arabia and the Islamic Republic of Iran normalized,” said Lavrov. Moscow has condemned the strikes as an act of aggression, accusing Washington and Tel Aviv of exacerbating instability rather than containing it. Earlier on March 2, President Vladimir Putin, together with Saudi Arabia’s Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, discussed the risks of the conflict. According to the Kremlin, both sides expressed serious concern about the real risks of the conflict spreading, which has already affected the territories of a number of Arab countries and could have catastrophic consequences. After the attacks launched on Tehran, Russia’s Foreign Ministry accused Washington and Tel Aviv of hiding behind concerns about Iran’s nuclear program while actually pursuing regime change. Lavrov warned that the attacks risked triggering a humanitarian, economic, and possibly radiological catastrophe in the region. Russian President Vladimir Putin has signaled that Moscow may consider ending most natural gas exports to Europe, instead focusing on emerging global markets that could offer higher returns. Putin Threatens to Cut Europe Off Gas Supplies Speaking on state television, Putin on March 4 said he would instruct his government to assess the potential move in coordination with Russian energy companies. “Other markets are opening now, maybe it’s better for us to end supplies to the European market right now? To go to those markets that are opening now and get a foothold there,” said Putin. He added that several buyers are willing to pay higher prices for Russian gas, which could offset revenues previously earned from European clients.

Met have a long long history of fitting up Muslims for the Israeli military – via Freemasonry perhaps – Iranian spies in Chabad group in London working with Mossad front called Community Security Trust? Four arrested on suspicion of spying on Jewish community for Iran, Met Police says Following the arrests by counter-terror police, searches are taking place in Wembley and Barnet in north London, along with Watford in Hertfordshire.

BBC MI5 deception. 7/7 London bombings – Israel Mossad connection? BBC Verify gets it wrong. Ten years after 7/7: 13 holes in government & media account of 2005 London Bombings 7/7 led to wars abroad and loss of freedoms at home … but do we know what really happened that day? For the London media 7/7 is ‘done and dusted’, but for Tony Gosling, who helped cover the IRA London bombing campaign for the BBC, nothing could be further from the truth Monday 6th July 2015 Litany of media, police & judicial failures: 10th anniversary of 7/7 London Bombings Lies & betrayal of victims’ families: 10th anniversary of 7/7 London Bombings 13 holes in government and media account of 7/7 London bombings 1. Train the alleged bombers are supposed to have caught from Luton was cancelled that day 2. Benjamin Netanyahu who was in London that day and Israeli embassy had a warning before the ‘surprise attack’ bombings according to AP journalist Amy Tiebel and Israeli embassy spokesperson Dan Sheham 3. After speaking to scores of survivors that day Guardian’s Mark Honigsbaum describes bombs were ‘under the carriage of a train’ 4. French anti-terrorism expert Christophe Chaboud said tube train bombs were so powerful they were almost certainly C4 military explosives not home made TATP 5. Peter Power ‘terror drills’ at same three tube stations on same day, which he himself describes a ‘spooky coincidence’? Only about one in eight billion chance Peter Power is telling the truth. 6. Peter power’s drills were commissioned by Reed Elsevier, event organisers of Britain’s biggest annual arms fair, Exel in docklands. 7. Chemical and Biological attack police drills going on before the attacks that morning. 8. Despite hundreds of CCTV cameras, no CCTV images of any of four alleged bombers getting on to or on any of four tube trains or bus 9. Daniel Obachike says he was on the no. 30 bus believes he identified the bomber who was a white male, and that alleged bomber Hasib Hussain was not on his bus. 10. No trial because bombers are dead but Lady justice Hallett’s 2010 inquest into the 7/7 attacks was designed for a single death and held without a jury. 11. Victims’ families stonewalled: questions were not answered by the inquests, families were not allowed to have legal representation at the inquests. 12. Potential mastermind, Islamist organiser Al-Muhajiroun’s Haroon Aswat who spoke to the bombers in the days running up to the attacks is believed to have been working for MI6 and was never interviewed about 7/7, instead shipped out of UK legal jurisdiction. 13. Alleged bombers Mohamed Siddique Khan and Shehzad Tanweer were given terrorism training via Iqra bookshop in Beeston, Leeds by former Royal Navy Special Boat Service (SBS) soldier Martin McDaid Anniversary of London 7/7 terrorist bombings: clip of London Underground control room staff discussing possible explosion on London underground; clip Mark Honigsbaum – Guardian journalist on the scene of 7/7 Edgware Road – bombs under train; powerful military grade explosives; Peter Power terror drill – clip of him discussing spooky coincidence of 3 stations being the same; terror drills and false flags; clip of civil servant who’s worked for MoD and NHS Paul Oweson discussing chemical, biological exercises he saw on the day; no CCTV pictures of any alleged bombers on or getting on bombed tubes or buses on 7/7; clip of Daniel Obachike who says was on number 30 bus that was bombed; clip from ‘Ludicrous Diversion’ – independent inquiry needed; clip of families at press conference saying their questions haven’t been answered; clip of Graham Foulkes lost his 22 year old son David in the 7/7 attacks – terrorists not clean skins. Fran Anderson special 7/7 report on bookshop where two alleged bombers were trustees: Mohamed Siddique Khan and Shehzad Tanweer, two alleged bombers, were trustees of Iqra Learning Centre and bookshop in Bude Road, Beeston, Leeds. It was run by day-to-day by Martin McDaid, an (ex?) Special Boat Service (SBS) RN Special Forces ‘Muslim convert’. He also ran a terrorist training camp in the Lake District in which Khan is known to have attended; BBC Newsnight reported that youth worker at Iqra, Mark Hargreaves, says McDaid had a hidden agenda in grooming young Muslim men in terrorist skills and the bookshop received six-figure sums in government and EU grants.

Netanyahu on the Iran war. US troops for Jesus story. Religious war? Tucker Carlson – maybe we wanted a religious war. US troops were told Iran war ‘anointed by Jesus’ to bring on Armageddon, watchdog says Military Religious Freedom Foundation said it received widespread complaints about Christian-nationalist US commanders US commanders from every arm of the military have told their units that the war on Iran is “anointed by Jesus” and would bring about his return to Earth as part of the “Armageddon”, resulting in scores of complaints from serving members of the military. The Military Religious Freedom Foundation (MRFF), an organisation dedicated to ensuring that all members of the US military are guaranteed religious freedom, told Middle East Eye on Tuesday that it had received more than 200 similar complaints from personnel serving in the army, navy, air force, marine corps, and space force. The complaints received by the MRFF, first reported by journalist Jonathan Larsen, have come from more than 40 units and span at least 30 military installations. According to MRFF, one combat unit commander told non-commissioned officers (NCOs) at a briefing on Monday that the Israeli-US attacks on Iran are part of God’s “plan” and that US President Donald Trump was “anointed by Jesus to light the signal fire in Iran to cause Armageddon and mark his return to Earth”. A US NCO who wrote to the MRFF said their commander had told them the war with Iran was “all part of God’s divine plan”. The commander referred repeatedly to the Bible’s Book of Revelation and to Armageddon, the story about the battle between good and evil, in which Jesus triumphs and establishes a lasting peace on Earth. The commander is quoted by the NCO as saying: “President Trump has been anointed by Jesus to light the signal fire in Iran to cause Armageddon and mark his return to Earth.” “He had a big grin on his face when he said all of this, which made his message seem even more crazy,” the NCO wrote in his complaint. “Our commander would probably be described as a ‘Christian First’ supporter. He has been this way for a very long time and makes it clear that he desires all of us under him to become just like him as a Christian.” Christian Zionism in US military Michael L Weinstein, founder of MRFF and a veteran of the US Air Force and Reagan White House, told MEE that his organisation was continuing to be inundated with complaints from serving US military personnel who had been told that they should be excited to be part of the war on Iran, as it would bring about “Armageddon” and the return of Jesus Christ. “This is not just one rogue commander,” Weinstein said, pointing to the growing influence of Christian nationalists and fundamentalists in the US military. US Secretary of War Pete Hegseth, an ultra-conservative Christian nationalist who has been described as the Pentagon’s “holy warrior”, sponsors a weekly Bible study that preaches support for Israel. As Larsen reported, while some Christians claim biblical prophecy requires Israel to exist for Jesus to return, Hegseth’s Bible study leader, Ralph Drollinger, teaches that Israel should be supported because God blesses Israel’s allies and curses its enemies. Weinstein said that MRFF received similar complaints about fundamentalist Christian, end-of-the-world theology in the wake of the Hamas-led attack on southern Israel on 7 October 2023.

Was Solomon’s Temple Jewish or Pagan? Tony quotes from book on Masons. Jihadis, Isis sent to war? Accelerationism. Stellar Theology And Masonic Astronomy Robert Hewitt Brown (1882) Stellar Theology and Masonic Astronomy is a comprehensive book written by Robert Hewitt Brown that explores the connections between astronomy, astrology, Solomon’s Temple and Freemasonry. The book delves into the history of the ancient science of astronomy and how it has influenced various cultures throughout history, including the Masonic fraternity. Brown examines the symbolism and allegory used in Masonic rituals and how they relate to the stars and planets. He also explores the concept of the zodiac and how it is used in both astronomy and astrology. The book is divided into several sections, each focusing on a specific aspect of astronomy and its relation to Freemasonry. Brown covers topics such as the history of astronomy, the symbolism of the constellations, the use of the celestial globe in Masonic rituals, and the significance of the North Star. Overall, Stellar Theology and Masonic Astronomy is a fascinating read for anyone interested in the history of astronomy or the symbolism and allegory used in Freemasonry. Brown’s writing is clear and concise, making the book accessible to both Masonic scholars and general readers alike.This Is A New Release Of The Original 1882 Edition.This scarce antiquarian book is a facsimile reprint of the old original and may contain some imperfections such as library marks and notations. Because we believe this work is culturally important, we have made it available as part of our commitment for protecting, preserving, and promoting the world’s literature in affordable, high quality, modern editions, that are true to their original work.First published in 1882, Robert Hewitt Brown’s ‘Stellar Theology and Masonic Astronomy’ created a sensation. Well researched and beautifully written, the book reveals the hidden meanings of masonic and other symbols, linking them both to pagan religion and to modern faiths such as Judaism and Christianity. As a highly respected Freemason, (having achieved the 32nd degree), and a diligent scholar of the ancient mysteries, Brown spoke from an almost unique position of authority. ‘Stellar Theology and Masonic Astronomy’ lays bare astonishing astronomical explanations for a host of religious allegories and motifs, allowing the reader to reconcile numerous otherwise incomprehensible enigmas. A must-read for both mason and non-mason alike.  

Maduro kidnap in Venezuela: “At one point, they launched something; I don’t know how to describe it. It was like a very intense sound wave. Suddenly I felt like my head was exploding from the inside,” the witness said. “We all started bleeding from the nose. Some were vomiting blood. We fell to the ground, unable to move. We couldn’t even stand up after that sonic weapon — or whatever it was.” – officials around him incapacitated by discombobulator. What is ‘discombobulator’, the secret weapon Trump says US forces used during Venezuela raid ‘Suddenly all our radar systems shut down without explanation’ One of Maduro’s former guards later revealed the sequence of events on the night of the US raid, and said, “Suddenly all our radar systems shut down without any explanation.” “The next thing we saw were drones, a lot of drones, flying over our positions. We didn’t know how to react,” he said, saying that helicopters then appeared — “barely eight” — carrying about 20 US troops into the area. “The Discombobulator” then was aimed directly at Maduro’s defenders. “At one point, they launched something; I don’t know how to describe it. It was like a very intense sound wave. Suddenly I felt like my head was exploding from the inside,” the witness said. “We all started bleeding from the nose. Some were vomiting blood. We fell to the ground, unable to move. We couldn’t even stand up after that sonic weapon — or whatever it was.” Maduro, 63, is now locked up in a Brooklyn federal jail awaiting trial on narcoterrorism charges, while his former vice president, Delcy Rodriguez, serves as Venezuela’s interim leader. “We have a great relationship with the new president,” Trump said. “She’s been terrific.”

Secretary of War Pete Hegseth – aims to rebuild a ‘third temple’ in Jerusalem. Returning to the real estate much valued by the Satanic Medieval Knights Templar. But was Solomon’s Temple designed by God, or by priests and architects of the Phoenician, Babylonian and Egyptian Mystery Religions? How Was the Temple in Jerusalem Aligned Compared to Ancient Eastern Temples? Explore how Solomon’s temple followed or diverged from Near Eastern temple orientation practices. By Scott Smith, OT in Context · Published 2025 Timeline Focus: 960 BCE The Surprising Reality When Solomon built the temple around 960 BC, its eastward orientation followed a pattern found in temples from Egypt to Babylon. The Context Question But here’s what most people don’t realize: this architectural choice had theological implications, reflecting sunrise symbolism across the ancient world. What We Know Excavations and reconstructions of temples in Egypt, Syria, and Mesopotamia reveal a strong east-facing pattern. Solomon’s temple followed suit, likely symbolizing divine illumination. Understanding the shared design patterns requires architectural overlays on the timeline. Jump to 960 BC and see exactly how temple orientation aligned with theology—discover what this reveals about Israel’s cultural dialogue.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tN-aTVkI5W0

Marine veteran, Brian McGinnes, interrupts hearing shouting ‘no-one wants to fight for Israel’, and gets arm broken. Meet Brian McGinnis, the Ex-Marine Ejected from Capitol Hill and Green Party Senate Candidate McGinnis was arrested and hospitalized Brian McGinnis, an ex-Marine and Green Party Senate candidate from North Carolina, was forcibly removed from a Senate Armed Services subcommittee hearing on Capitol Hill on Wednesday. The hearing, focused on military readiness, was interrupted when McGinnis began protesting US and Israel’s involvement in the conflict with Iran. McGinnis later claimed his arm was broken during the removal, while US Capitol Police alleged he resisted arrest and assaulted officers. Incident Details According to video footage provided to CBS News, McGinnis, dressed in a military uniform, shouted statements including ‘America does not want to send its sons and daughters to war for Israel.’ Capitol Police attempted to escort him from the hearing room, but McGinnis appeared to struggle with officers. At one point, near the doorway, Senator Tim Sheehy of Montana left the dais and assisted police officers in removing McGinnis. During the process, McGinnis’ left hand reportedly became caught between the door and the frame. Video footage shows Sheehy trying to dislodge the hand, after which McGinnis stated his arm was injured. He was subsequently escorted out of the room and transported to George Washington University Hospital. Capitol Police released a statement saying McGinnis faces multiple charges, including three counts of assaulting a police officer, three counts of resisting arrest, and one count of crowding, obstructing, and incommoding, referring to blocking an entrance. The agency described the protester as ‘putting everyone in a dangerous position by violently resisting and fighting our officers’ attempts to remove him.’ Speaking to CBS News, Mark Elbourno, the Green Party official managing McGinnis’ Senate campaign, defended his candidate, saying he ‘wasn’t assaulting anybody’ and ‘just wanted to be heard speaking loud and clear.’ Elbourno stated he was unsure of McGinnis’ current medical condition. Senator Sheehy posted on X that he intervened because McGinnis was ‘fighting back’ against police and that he sought to ‘help out and deescalate the situation.’ He added that McGinnis came to the Capitol ‘looking for a confrontation.’ Who Is Brian McGinnis? McGinnis served in the United States Marine Corps and currently works as a firefighter in North Carolina. He is running as a Green Party candidate for the US Senate and has been outspoken on anti-war policies. According to his campaign team, he attended the hearing to directly challenge congressional leaders on military spending and foreign policy, citing frustration with what he called ‘misleading statements about the war.’ Legal and Political Context Following the incident, McGinnis was arrested and transported to a hospital for evaluation of his arm injury. US Capitol Police maintain that protests are not allowed inside congressional buildings, directing demonstrators to designated areas on Capitol Grounds. The charges against McGinnis remain pending, and his case highlights the legal and security protocols surrounding disruptions of official government proceedings.

Hegseth on why the war on Iran. Stock markets lose billions. Hegseth – how did we know? Pete Hegseth floats third Jewish temple mission in unearthed speech: ‘It could happen’ President-elect Donald Trump’s nominee for Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth testifies during his Senate Armed Services confirmation hearing on Capitol Hill on Jan. 14, 2025, in Washington, D.C. Hegseth, an Army veteran and the former host of “FOX & Friends Weekend” on FOX News will be the first of the incoming Trump administration’s nominees to face questions from Senators. | Andrew Harnik/Getty Images Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth floated the possibility of a third Jewish temple on the Temple Mount in Jerusalem, according to a recently unearthed interview. “There’s no reason why the miracle of the re-establishment of the temple on the Temple Mount is not possible,” Hegseth said during a 2018 speech at the Arutz Sheva conference in Jerusalem, according to the Times of Israel. “I don’t know how it would happen. You don’t know how it would happen, but I know that it could happen,” he continued. “A step in that process, a step in every process, is a recognition that facts and activities on the ground truly matter.” “That’s why going and visiting Judea and Samaria and understanding that sovereignty — the very sovereignty of Israeli soil, Israeli cities, locations — is a critical next step to showing the world that this is the land for Jews and the Land of Israel,” he added. Hegseth’s unearthed comments come as President Donald Trump, who moved the U.S. Embassy in Israel to Jerusalem during his first term, has proposed that the U.S. seize Gaza. “The U.S. will take over the Gaza Strip, and we will do a [good] job with it, too,” Trump said Tuesday during a press briefing with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. The reconstruction of the Jewish Temple in Jerusalem features prominently in some veins of Christian eschatology, though other Christians maintain that Christ assumed the temple’s sacrificial system on Himself and rendered it unnecessary. The First Temple, also known as Solomon’s Temple, was destroyed by the Babylonians when they conquered Jerusalem in 586 B.C. Herod’s Temple, which was the second Jewish temple constructed in Jerusalem, was destroyed by the Romans when they sacked the city in A.D. 70, following a months-long siege.

BBC – no imminent threat of nuclear weapons in Iran. Pentagon tells Congress no intelligence showed Iran was preparing to strike before US attack Closed-door briefings acknowledge no evidence that Tehran intended to hit US forces first, as Democrats accuse Trump of launching a “war of choice.” Legality Of Strikes In Doubt Questions about the legality of Trump’s strikes were circulating earlier this week as the US military moved into place around Iran, and Trump continued to threaten action. Experts have raised concerns under both international and U.S. domestic law, with critics pointing to Congress’s constitutional power to declare war. Under international law, the U.N. Charter bars the use of force by one state against another state except for in the cases of self-defense or if there has been U.N. Security Council authorization. Trump has made the case with his comments this morning that the US and Israeli strikes were “pre-emptive” and aimed at defending the American people. But this is not a proportionate or necessary response on the available facts of the strength of Iran’s nuclear threat, experts say. “It would be a manifest violation of the United Nations Charter for the United States to strike Iran,” Rutgers Law School professor Adil Haque had told Newsweek on Friday prior to Saturday’s strikes. “Under international law, the use of force against another State is illegal unless it is authorized by the U.N. Security Council or is a necessary and proportionate act of self-defense against an actual or imminent armed attack.” He had said prior to the strikes: “The United States cannot invoke its right of self-defense because Iran has not attacked the United States, is not about to attack the United States, and does not plan to attack the United States.” Haque also noted that when posed previously with the question of authorizing force against Iran, the U.N. Security Council had “consistently chosen to use economic sanctions to compel Iran to accept limitations and oversight of its nuclear program to ensure that it is not converted into a weapons program in the future.”

The Iran War Is #Accelerationist Operation and Dark Enlightenment ‘Godfather’, Tony’s school-friend Nick Land, has moved from Shanghai to California: The Cathedral – Nick Land. Yvette Cooper – questions on war with Iran. Sunset on the Dark Enlightenment: Inside Nick Land’s San Francisco ‘Arrival Party’… “Both of you are on stage because you created the Dark Enlightenment,” he says, pausing as he collects his thoughts. “An ideology which was very potent at a certain moment. Now, though, I’m not sure if that moment has passed, but it’s changed. How, then, do you both feel the concept has evolved, and how do you see it evolving further?” Unsurprisingly, Yarvin responds first. “The Dark Enlightenment,” he says, “was responding to a set of different utopias—maybe it’s a conservative utopia, maybe it’s a liberal utopia, but it’s all the same teleology, this dream of a place that we’re going, and these progressive movements have, of course, moments of disillusionment, such as with the George Floyd hangover, or with Occupy Wall Street. These people had a millenarian view of the world that failed, and even on the right, there were all these fantasies of, like, restoring the 18th century, and that they were the second Tea Party—never mind that the original Tea Party was basically Antifa—and then their whole dream turned into the shitshow that was January 6th. What we see now is that these visions of the future have become nullified, and rather than history ending in the Fukuyama sense, instead nobody has any clear idea of where we’re going, and that inevitably allows for more interesting, more radical, ideas to spread.” Land nods. “I agree with a lot of what Curtis said. But really, I still firmly believe that the Unqualified Reservations model of government [a neocameralist system that treats government as a sovereign corporation owned by shareholders] is completely unsurpassed, and it would be absolutely fantastic to have this world shattered into a patchwork of microstates, and to have new modes of geopolitical experimentation open up. But I don’t think, in the short term, anyone is seeing that now.”… “I agree,” says a voice from behind us. “I don’t get why they were so solemn.” We turn, and sitting on the fountain smoking a wood pipe is Justin Murphy, host of the Other Life podcast and author of Based Deleuze, which reinterprets the French philosopher’s beliefs as a “reactionary leftism” laced with anti-egalitarian ideas. In 2020, it was Murphy who hosted the first event with Yarvin since his public doxxing and unofficial banishment from Silicon Valley, in many ways shepherding the arrival of the Dark Enlightenment into public discourse. “They confuse me,” he continues. “They’re always so negative. God, everything used to be so much worse, and now look where we are. We’ve got AI! We’ve got crypto! We’ve got power! The siege mentality is over! Woke is dead and gone! In fact,” he smiles and blows smoke, “Tonight probably marks the end of the ‘dissident’ right.” “What do you mean by that?” Sam asks. “Well, what more is there?” He replies. “We’ve done everything.” I consider what he’s saying, and whether it’s he or I who is living in a bubble. We linger outside talking for a little longer, and upon coming inside, notice that many of the guests have disappeared. A short man with round glasses tells us that they’ve mostly migrated downstairs to the back terrace, where Land and Grimes are having an impromptu conversation and fielding questions. We walk down the stairs to join them, and find the crowd clustered around a cackling fire pit overlooking the Bay. I take a seat and observe the discussion, taking pictures of the scene. A raven-haired girl comes over and offers me ketamine, boasting she smuggled it in, and soon, the party starts to fade out.

The Last Trump. Patricia Opulenza poem. [see below]

Videos of full shows – Essentials: Michael Hudson | Blackrock/Vanguard | Netanyahu at the 7/7 London Bombings | Why/how Israel Assassinated JFK & RFK | Operation Gladio | Tony on Brexit & (4th Reich) Traitors of Arnhem | Creation vs. Evolution | God vs. Lucifer | ‘Great Plan’ for 3 World Wars | Devil Worship: The Rise Of Satanism | Nuclear Armed IDF Doomsday Cult | Aanirfan | Armageddonists I have known: Nick Land (1976-8) | George Monbiot (1995-7) | Manna for the Revelation Generation: CONSPIRACY CLASSICS, longer interviews/lectures

Part Two – International news review, Accelerationist, Armageddonist reports and investigations