MP3 of Friday 08th July 2022 Show [right click to download]… …(from c. 23:00) – Links to this week’s full interviews, bottom of page
SHOW STARTS AT 17:00 = 5pm BST – FOR 3 HRS TO C. 20:00
17:00 to 20:00 BST, 12:00-15:00 EST, 09:00-12:00 PST. 08:00-11:00 NZ Time – Repeats 11 & 5 AM & PM BST daily on our Sputnik stream
Click here to Listen live online each week LIVE STREAM www.talkradio.org.uk Alternative live stream www.radioquk.com
OR Download The Show After Transmission HERE
TONY’S BOOKS: Bilderberg.org – TONY’S CHANNELS: Telegram (new) BitchuteLegacy Odysee911 ForumRadio4AllThe Land Is OursVKTwitSpaceNSAbook – YouTube: This Show, Peter BoreniusPublic Enquiry

Radio4All mp3 audio files usually available from 23:00 2-4hrs, after TX – we’ll credit you if you rebroadcast. Any probs. mp3s should be on alternative links below by then

Part One News Review and Investigative Reports

Boris resigns as PM.  PMQs Kier Starmer and Boris Johnson – Boris’s resignation.  Auditors point out systematic rule-breaking about Bristol Council finances and practice Bristol City Council broke rules awarding 203 contracts worth £69m last year – External auditors are calling for “urgent action” By Adam Postans, Local democracy reporter  4 JUL 2022 Bristol City Council officers broke the rules on awarding contracts for goods and services more than 200 times to the value of £69million last year, a report reveals. That is more than double the previous 12 months and has prompted external auditors to tell the authority to address the issue “as a matter of urgency” because it could be a sign of “irregularities” and an increased risk of fraud. There were 203 occasions in 2021/22 where re-tendering procedures were not followed correctly, officially called procurement breaches, which equates to 14 per cent of all contracts awarded by the authority – almost one in seven. That compares with 94 breaches to the value of £14million the year before, about 11 per cent of total contracts. The council says an effective and transparent breaches process is in place to detect when regulations are not followed and that more training and a procurement policy, which the organisation does not currently have, will be introduced. Auditor Grant Thornton’s interim value-for-money 2020/21 report, presented to audit committee members, said: “The overall level of breaches in both years is higher than we would expect and the increase and final value in 2021/22 is of some note. “In our experience, high levels of breaches have been associated elsewhere with governance and procurement irregularities and, as such, the issue should be addressed as a matter of urgency.” In a separate report to the committee, the huge rise was highlighted as a “significant governance issue” for the authority. The annual governance statement, a legally-required document alongside its financial statements that explains how the council ensures it is run effectively and makes appropriate decisions in the right way, said: “The number of breaches of the council’s procurement rules during 2021/22 significantly increased from 2020/21. The 2020/21 value-for-money report by the council’s external auditors has recommended urgent action be taken to address the high level of breaches. “When the procurement rules are breached, there is an increased risk that the council enters into a contract which is not best value and/or is not the best way of achieving organisational objectives. Breaches also reduce transparency and fairness of decision making, which can increase the risk of fraud, conflicts of interest and reputational damage.” Finance director Denise Murray told the meeting the high number of instances was “a bit of a surprise to us”. She said: “Procurement breaches come in a number of forms. “You will have breaches in the regulations, which is the legislative framework, and you will have breaches in relation to our procurement rules which cover a range of things. They deal with direct awards, retrospective extensions to orders, so some of this captures forward planning or the need for contracts to be extended in a timely manner in line with the contract.” Grant Thornton recommended that the council should “continue to scrutinise and act to reduce contract breaches” by introducing procurement compliance training and having the figures monitored by audit committee or cabinet, which was not unusual in other authorities but did not happen at the city council. A response in the report by the authority’s management said: “Whilst full compliance can never be guaranteed and ‘under-reporting’ of breaches, in particular, is an inherent possibility, an effective and transparent breaches governance process is in place to detect instances of non-compliance. “Procurement compliance training will be more widely rolled out and actual compliance activity reported quarterly to audit committee via internal audit.” It also accepted a recommendation to introduce a procurement strategy. Bristol City Council was asked to comment further and said its response was in the report. Grant Thornton’s report said: “In order to remain compliant with procurement legislation the council should follow its procurement rules and re-tender in line with current legislation. “If these procedures and legislation are not followed then this is classed as a procurement breach and the council’s procedures require breaches to be formally acknowledged and recorded. An internal audit report on procurement compliance (August 2021) gave an opinion of ‘reasonable’ assurance but recommended further ways to strengthen governance arrangements and reduce breach numbers.”

DESPITE AIR QUALITY IMPROVING – HERE COMES BRISTOL’S FASCIST ‘CLEAN AIR ZONE’ TAX WHICH TAXES THE DISABLED AND EXEMPTS THE SUPER-RICH: Geoff Gollop, Conservative Councillor for Westbury on Trym and Henlease, Deputy Leader of the Conservative Group, and part of the Scrutiny Group – he discusses the Auditors saying certain aspects of Bristol Council spending and practice should be urgently looked at – he also discusses the proposed Clean Air Zone. Clean Air Zone critics in Bristol vow to boycott city centre and go elsewhere Some Bristolians are vowing to boycott the city centre following the announcement of an official start date for the city’s Clean Air Zone. Others have been left with more questions around the rules of these new restrictions – including why some car park entrances have been included in the zone and what it means for residents who already live in the area. Mayor of Bristol Marvin Rees made the announcement on Wednesday (July 6) that the city’s Clean Air Zone, which will charge drivers with certain vehicles a minimum of £9 for driving in or near the city centre, will begin on November 28 this year. He also said that three quarters of vehicles driven around the city centre will not be affected, with only one in three drivers expected to have to pay due to the criteria of vehicles excluded from the zone. In an article by Bristol Live this week, we reported that signs and cameras were already being put up around the city on the edge of the Clean Air Zone (CAZ) as a major public awareness campaign started, with billboard posters up to warn people they could be charged. The article has received almost 80 comments from readers, sharing their concerns, questions and confusion over the new rule changes. Some were desperate for an explanation over the boundary limits of the zone – and why certain car park entrances had been included. One commenter wrote: “No one has yet explained why the zone starts on the Portway before Cumberland basin and why the entrance to Trenchard Street carpark is in the zone. “As far as I can see the only reason is to generate money. Driving from the Portway to the A370 goes nowhere near the city center. The zone is deliberately extended by a few yards to cover the carpark entrance.” While another asked: “Is it true that it also covers the entrance to Cabot Circus car park?” View are map below to see the boundary. Another argument readers made surrounded the topic of what residents who already live in the CAZ would benefit from – one reader said they ‘couldn’t help’ already living in the area and dubbed the idea ‘unfair’. Saetana commented: “People cannot help the fact that they live within the zone – it did not exist when they moved there. “I can see a case for new residents having to pay once the zone starts as they will be aware when they move that they will be living in a CAZ. I do not however believe that existing residents of the CAZ area should have to pay – its just not fair.” A second said: “I live literally on the last street of the zone – my street is the border beyond which the zone ends. So I won’t get any of the health benefits, just the hassle.”

Bitchute video of complete show

Part Two – Ukraine/Covid/Climate Round-Up With End Times Prophecy Reports

DEEP STATE WANTS LE CERCLE’S MR VAX, SO REMOVES BORIS? David Miller, former Sociology Professor at Bristol University, who was sacked due to ‘anti-Semitism’, joins Tony and Martin.  The Dark, Fascist Connections Of The UK’s Vaccine Minister, Nadhim Zahawi Cost of living crisis and sanctions on Russia.  Nadhim Zahawi set to become new PM?  Nathan Lee, ITV News, doorsteps Nadhim Zahawi.  Suella Braverman, a Tory candidate for PM, on ITV Peston show.   Judge Him By The Company He Keeps Rain is wet, the Pope is Catholic and politicians lie. Not exactly breaking news. It’s how it is and has been since time immemorial. Boris Johnson seems to have been on a mission to prove the latter over the past 12 to 14 months as he has shown himself up to be a record-breaking, pathological fibber time after time. Lying is almost like an impulsive reaction to him – similar to a sneeze or a nervous twitch. He just can’t help himself. Every time he opens his mouth, it spews deception. So it was no surprise when his newly recruited Vaccine Minister Nadhim Zahawi followed in his footsteps, blatantly lying to all and sundry, when he advised the public that the introduction of vaccine passports or immunity certificates would not be imposed upon the British public. He categorically stated, at the beginning of the year, that these were not on the agenda and that; ‘no one has been given or will be required to have a vaccine passport.’ He even referred to the use of such passports as ‘discriminatory’ and said it was ‘not how we do things in the UK.’ Fast forward a mere four or five months later, and the ‘discriminatory’ passports are perfectly acceptable and exactly ‘how we do things in the UK’, it would seem. Appearing on BBC Breakfast, Zahawi declared that COVID-19 passports would be issued for those who wanted to travel overseas and that they would be ‘operationally possible’ by May 17. So now that it is clear, if we needed any assurances, that the UK Vaccine Minister, Nadhim Zahawi is a liar, what else do we know about him? You would expect, wouldn’t you, a man who is in charge of an operation to inject every man, woman and child in the country with a vaccine to be an upstanding, honourable, ethical individual who places the safety and health of the public before any other interest? You would expect Boris to appoint a person who conducts his affairs with good intentions – the wellness of society being at the forefront of his mind. Only someone with a background of decorum, responsibility and integrity would be fit for this role, right? 

https://youtu.be/7FnqCT6LXwk

Mick Lynch for PM?  His speech at a rally to fight for workers pay and conditions, and also fight for the rights of Mitie outsourced employees.  Boris’s resignation speech.  Prince Charles and cash for Honours fiasco [also covered in depth later].  Blocking of Russian media channels.  David Miller’s show on Press TV – Palestine Declassified.  Murdoch media.  Infiltrators in big and small left wing organisations – secret services and corporate. 

Geoffrey Sachs says Covid engineered in a US lab.  Is it a plandemic?  Biolabs in Ukraine.  Extreme sanctions on Russia forcing world into multi polarity with US in decline.  Mass propaganda against Russia.  Crimes Putin is accused of by West with no real proof.  Jeffrey Sachs Presents Evidence of Possible Lab Origin of Covid-19 – An article in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences calls for an independent investigation of information held by U.S.-based institutions that could shed light on the origins of Covid. In an article published Thursday, economist Jeffrey Sachs called for an independent investigation of information held by U.S.-based institutions that could shed light on the origins of the Covid-19 pandemic. Writing in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Sachs and his co-author, Neil Harrison, a Columbia University professor of molecular pharmacology and therapeutics, said that federal agencies and universities possess evidence that has not been adequately reviewed, including virus databases, biological samples, viral sequences, email communications, and laboratory notebooks. Sachs and Harrison also highlighted a tantalizing scientific detail that may be an indication that SARS-CoV-2, the coronavirus that causes Covid-19, originated in a laboratory: a sequence of eight amino acids on a critical part of the virus’s spike protein that is identical to an amino acid sequence found in cells that line human airways. Sachs and Harrison are hardly the first to suggest that SARS-CoV-2 might have been created in a lab. Since its genetic sequence was first published in February 2020, scientists have puzzled over the furin cleavage site, an area on the virus’s spike that allows it to be cleaved by a protein on the membrane of human cells and makes the coronavirus particularly dangerous to people. Once split, the virus releases its genetic material into the cell and reproduces. While attaching to cells and spike cleavage is part of how all coronaviruses work, SARS-CoV-2 is the only one of its class, sarbecoviruses, that can use furin for the cleavage. As with past discussion of a possible lab origin of SARS-CoV-2, this latest theory has already been met with considerable pushback. Even some scientists who are open to the idea that a lab accident could have sparked the pandemic remain unconvinced by the particular trail of evidence laid out by Sachs and Harrison.

THE GREAT DECOUPLING WITH RUSSIA – COMPARABLE WITH THE 1956 SUEZ CRISIS AND THE GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE MOVING FROM LONDON TO WASHINGTON, NOW TO BEIJING AND MOSCOW – The company BlackRock, Inc manages $10 trillion dollars in assets, and as such investors tend to place close attention to the views and opinions of chairman and CEO Larry Fink. Here is what he said in his recent letter to shareholders: “the Russian invasion of Ukraine has put an end to the globalization we have experienced over the last three decades… Russia’s aggression in Ukraine and its subsequent decoupling from the global economy is going to prompt companies and governments worldwide to re-evaluate their dependencies and re-analyze their manufacturing and assembly footprints – something that Covid had already spurred many to start doing.”[1] In other words, the spectacle of the last few weeks, and the response by NATO has had far-reaching ramifications beyond the aggression mustered by the United States as they invaded or devastated one country after another for years and years. Globalization is dead! A massive decoupling is taking place! Indeed, the sanctions put in place to hurt Russia are hitting Americans, Canadians and the European communities too as we pull up to the gas station or watch our food prices start to escalate. [2][3] Meanwhile, on Friday, President Biden, flanked by European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen announced an agreement to lower the European Union’s dependence on Vladimir Putin’s oil and gas supplies. According to Biden: “We’re going to have to make sure the families in Europe can get through this winter and the next while we’re building the infrastructure for a diversified, resilient and clean energy future.”[4] So the stakes for the Ukraine literally go far beyond the bullets, bombs and bravery of troops in the Eastern European country. While NATO still won’t engage them on the battlefield (let us hope) the many other financial measures levelled against Russia that are having consequences potentially as devastating as an actual war. With Saudi Arabia now pursuing talks allowing some of it’s oil to be priced in the Chinese currency the Yuan, the dominance of the American dollar as part of the standard for maintaining its power is in jeopardy. As well, 5 nations including Russia itself rejected the United Nations General Assembly vote to immediately end Russia’s military aggression in Ukraine. The 35 nations that abstained did so, in many cases as suspecting that the West incited the conditions that led to the conflict. So Russia is not exactly “isolated.” [5] Is a new divided world part of the New World Order that has been unraveled in front of us? This week’s Global Research News Hour makes an attempt to peek at the future of this gawd awful war!

Henry Kissinger, now 100 years old, has brought a book out called ‘Leadership’. James Docherty interviews Henry Kissinger for BBC World Service – his role in Vietnam war and the Chilean coup – backtracking on his opinion on Ukraine/ Russia war.  Kissinger says Ukraine should concede territory to Russia for greater Peace article.  Kissinger on China/Taiwan situation.  Integrity Initiative, run by Military Intelligence, targetted Jeremy Corbyn, even though it’s meant to target Russia. Henry Kissinger: Ukraine Should Give Up Territory to Russia to Reach Peace “Negotiations need to begin in the next two months before it creates upheavals and tensions that will not be easily overcome,” he said. “Ideally, the dividing line should be a return to the status quo ante. Pursuing the war beyond that point would not be about the freedom of Ukraine, but a new war against Russia itself.” Former United States Secretary of State and National Security Advisor Henry Kissinger attends the ceremony for the Henry A. Kissinger Prize on January 21, 2020 in Berlin, Germany. Talking at Davos, Kissinger said Ukraine should accept giving up territory to reach a peace agreement with Russia.

David Miller and other left wing academics targetted by Integrity Initiative.  James le Mesurier, head of the White Helmets, ‘committed suicide’ but evidence would suggest murder.  Narrative Managers in Overdrive After Death of White Helmets Founder – Caitlin Johnstone tackles the lie factory surrounding James Le Mesurier.- By Caitlin Johnstone CaitlinJohnstone.com James Le Mesurier, the founder of the White Helmets, has died. He was found to have plummeted from a height to the street outside his home, and authorities are reportedly calling it a suicide. Le Mesurier has a history with British military intelligence and was fundamentally involved with an extremely shady narrative management operation geared toward manufacturing support for yet another imperialist military intervention in yet another Middle Eastern nation, so obviously any claims of suicide should be taken with a grain of salt no smaller than a Buick. But it is worth noting that according to Middle East Eye, Le Mesuriers wife told police that hed been struggling with psychological issues for which he was taking medications and had previously been hospitalized. Le Mesuriers home was reportedly only accessible by fingerprint and no video footage of anyone besides Le Mesurier and his wife entering or leaving has been found. Establishment narrative managers, for their part, have been floating the possibility that the White Helmets founder was murdered by the Russian government. The Washington Examiner has published an article titled Did Russia kill White Helmets founder James Le Mesurier?, calling to mind Betteridges law of headlines, which states that Any headline that ends in a question mark can be answered by the word no. The BBCs Mark Urban tweeted out and then deleted a thread (screenshots here) in which he cites an anonymous source who claims to have known Le Mesuriers flat well enough to be sure that its not possible to fall from his balcony, then meaningfully pointing to a black propaganda campaign by Russia and Assad media against Le Mesurier. He apparently didnt consider the possibility of suicide until later, saying he deleted his thread due to new information.

Follow David Miller on Twitter at ‘tracking_power’, or at www.spinwatch.org, or donate to www.supportmiller.org to support him in his industrial tribunal.  VIDEO: How UK’s intelligence services target dissident academics Max Blumenthal·July 5, 2022 – Dissident antiwar UK academics Piers Robinson and David Miller describe being targeted by the British intelligence services through media proxies and infiltrators. They examine The Grayzone’s revelations of journalist Paul Mason’s collusion with a top intelligence officer to destroy the careers of “rogue academics” like them. The editor-in-chief of The Grayzone, Max Blumenthal is an award-winning journalist and the author of several books, including best-selling Republican Gomorrah, Goliath, The Fifty One Day War, and The Management of Savagery. He has produced print articles for an array of publications, many video reports, and several documentaries, including Killing Gaza. Blumenthal founded The Grayzone in 2015 to shine a journalistic light on America’s state of perpetual war and its dangerous domestic repercussions.

Zionist attacks on academics – Steven Salaita was offered a tenured post at the University of Illinois in late 2013 and was scheduled to take it up in August 2014. However, in July 2014, Salaita posted many tweets critical of the Zionist killing spree in Gaza in which over 2,000 people died. A cherry-picked selection of these were brought to the attention of the University by the press and Zionist groups. The first attacks came from William Jacobson a law professor at Cornell University who works closely with Zionist groups such as the Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting and Analysis (CAMERA). Within days the Zionist Champaign-Urbana Jewish Federation, which states that among its purposes is supporting the development of the Israeli regime, had joined the attack. Rapidly the university became the focus of a mass Zionist campaign and it received hundreds of letters from university alumni, students, parents of students, and members of Champaign-Urbana’s pro-Israel community as well as pressure from several large and small donors threatening to remove funding in the future. Emails that Illinois Chancellor Phyllis Wise exchanged on the case, which were later published, though heavily redacted, reportedly show that she was more concerned about a donor who is on the board of the Jewish Federation and Hillel, two Zionist organizations than she was about the views of academic officials who report to her.’ Hillel is the campus organization claiming to represent Jewish students, but which is in fact formally Zionist. Of course, accusations of anti-Semitism were bandied about by the Zionists. But Salaita is not in the least bit racist against Jews. In the end, because of this, they had to find something else to sack him for. Salaita explained: If there’s no serious moral or political argument in response to criticism of Israel, then condemn the speaker for various failures of tone and appropriateness. A word becomes more relevant than an array of war crimes. Salaita later won a court case against the university, which also found that Chancellor Phyllis Wise was involved in tampering with evidence in the case by trying to conceal email messages and she immediately resigned. A settlement was reached in November 2015 which awarded Salaita $600,000 and an additional $275,000 to cover his legal expenses. He did not, however, get his job back. What does the case tell us about the wider climate? First, as Salaita himself unflinchingly put it: Zionist smear campaigns aim to make you destitute. Despite subsequent job offers also withdrawn he was unable to secure another job at a university and he now drives a school bus in Washington DC. He remains, however, an active critic of Zionism. Salaita has published a guide on how to handle a Zionist defamation campaign. His Twitter followers have gone from about 2,000 before his sacking to 10,000 in late 2014, rocketing up to more than 55,000 today. He has published several books since the incident in Illinois, and his spirit remains strong.

The end of the Kissinger interview – who was coming to meet him after James Naughtie? Full interview is below and on the BBC World Service website.  US’s China strategy a path to confrontation, Beijing warnsHenry Kissinger says the risk of conflict is growing as technology advances The US strategy towards China has pushed the two powers into confrontation, threatening turmoil for other nations, Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi warned on Tuesday. Wang said the US must choose the right course in its relations with China by abandoning its cold war mentality and managing differences between the two countries. Addressing an online seminar looking at the role of former US secretary of state Henry Kissinger in improving China-US ties, Wang accused Washington of disrupting peace in the Taiwan Strait, and for deciding the two countries were rivals. “The current atmosphere of China-US relations is very abnormal, and the extreme anxiety of the US is completely unnecessary,” the Chinese foreign ministry quoted Wang as saying. “If the US blindly defines China-US relations in terms of great power competition and takes a ‘you lose, I win’ approach to policy, it will only push China and the US into confrontation and conflict, and push the world into division and turmoil.

Matt Chorley on Times Radio, with ‘The Big Thing’[SUNDAY TIMES ARTICLE]Prince Charles and taking cash for Peerages – Royal sleaze – Lord Brownlow bailing out rich and famous types 04 Jul 2022 Matt Chorley: Big Thing – Prince Charles Matt speaks to Gabriel Pogrund about his investigations.  Crooked Prince Charles Cash For Gongs, Gabriel Pogrund investigates The Big Thing Times Radio 04Jul22 – Prince Charles honoured tycoon Lord Brownlow who bailed out his eco-village – Heir to the throne ignored aide’s advice against close ties with Tory peer The inquiry by the Office of the Scottish Charity Regulator has confirmed for the first time that it is investigating Brownlow’s decision to buy up unwanted properties at Knockroon. “We can confirm that the work of Havisham Group [Brownlow’s company] and property transactions relating to the Knockroon development in Ayrshire forms part of our overall investigation, work on which is ongoing,” a spokesman said. In September 2013, months after he started bailing out Knockroon, Brownlow hosted his 50th birthday party at Dumfries House, which is only partially open to the public through 60-minute paid tours during the summer. Some of the house is available for private hire, but only when the prince is not using the premises. It is unclear whether Brownlow paid for the use of the estate and, if so, whether he was charged at the normal commercial rate. There were performances by Dynamo, the celebrity magician, Alfie Boe, the prominent English tenor, and Cirque du Soleil acrobatic fire-dancers.

Georgia Guide Stones blown up – probably by conspiracy theorists who think they’re a New World Order plot.  Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature. Guide reproduction wisely improving fitness and diversity. Unite humanity with a living new language.  Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature. Guide reproduction wisely improving fitness and diversity. Unite humanity with a living new language. Rule passion faith tradition and all things with tempered reason. Protect people and nations with fair laws and just courts. Let all nations rule internally resolving external disputes in a world court. Avoid petty laws and useless officials. Balance personal rights with social duties. Prize truth beauty love seeking harmony with the infinite. Be not a cancer on the Earth Leave room for nature Leave room for nature.

Vladimir Zelenko, Trump’s former Doctor, RIP, interviewed by Anne Vardistile, saying Covid is a weapon of mass murder.  In March 2020, Dr. Zelenko’s team was one of the first in the country to successfully treat thousands of Covid-19 patients in the prehospital setting. While battling recurrent and metastatic sarcoma, recovering from open-heart surgery, and undergoing aggressive chemotherapy, Dr. Zelenko developed his now-famous “Zelenko Protocol,” which has saved lives all around the world. In December 2020, Zelenko with co-authors published an article on a retrospective case study of outpatient treatment with zinc, low-dose hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin, in the International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents, which indicated a significant reduction in the incidence of hospitalization of COVID-19 patients that had been treated with the protocol, 2.8% treated compared with 15.4% untreated. Zelenko was also a courageous advocate and defender of fundamental principles of medicine. He persevered against unrelenting defamation of character from the media, and threats against his person. Dr. Zelenko was an observant orthodox Jew, and was married with 8 children, and has authored two books called Metamorphosis and Essence to Essence.

Radio4All download pages
COMPLETE SHOW AND FULL INTERVIEWS
[right click to download]
#1 – Complete 3hr show – [right click to download]
Full interviews with…
#2 – Boris Johnson resignation speech Thu07Jul22 00:06:00
#3 – Gabriel Pogrund investigates Prince Charles: Dumfries House, cash for honours, suitcases of cash,
The Big Thing on Times Radio 00:30:00
#4 – Henry Kissinger hints on BBC_WS WWIII will begin in Taiwan as cover for main Middle East war on God 01:00:00

 

Tony’s new paperback and eBooks Traitors Of Arnhem, Siege Of Heaven; Siege Of Heaven Reader – all available for donation, or to buy, via www.bilderberg.org
BCfm’s weekly Politics Show presented by Tony Gosling with Irish Republican Labour activist Martin Summers was forced off FM, now online only. We were ‘rested due to the pandemic’ on 24 March 2020 by BCfm charity ‘CEO’ Patrick Hart who is a longtime personal friend of Bristol’s all-powerful right-wing ‘Labour’ mayor Marvin Rees. This Internet only NOT The BCfm Politics Show is now available 17:00-c. 21:00 live on Fridays. Pat Hart replaced us with an inane student show repeating MSM stories called The Bristol Agenda. If you’d like to share your views on his deliberate dumbing-down mismanagement you can contact UK broadcasting regulator Ofcom or BCfm board chair and the ‘Don’ here.

February 2019 Ofcom complaint result: UKLFI exposed as creation of Israeli foreign ministryBristol Post article: BCfm cleared after being reported to Ofcom for anti-semitic conspiracy theories

MP3 of Friday 01st July 2022 Show [right click to download]… …(from c. 23:00) – Links to this week’s full interviews, bottom of page
SHOW STARTS AT 17:00 = 5pm BST – FOR 3 HRS TO C. 20:00
17:00 to 20:00 BST, 12:00-15:00 EST, 09:00-12:00 PST. 08:00-11:00 NZ Time – Repeats 11 & 5 AM & PM BST daily on our Sputnik stream
Click here to Listen live online each week LIVE STREAM www.talkradio.org.uk Alternative live stream www.radioquk.com
OR Download The Show After Transmission HERE
TONY’S BOOKS: Bilderberg.org – TONY’S CHANNELS: Telegram (new) BitchuteLegacy Odysee911 ForumRadio4AllThe Land Is OursVKTwitSpaceNSAbook – YouTube: This Show, Peter BoreniusPublic Enquiry

Radio4All mp3 audio files usually available from 23:00 2-4hrs, after TX – we’ll credit you if you rebroadcast. Any probs. mp3s should be on alternative links below by then

Part One News Review and Investigative Reports

Justin Thomas, PCS Union official, joins Tony and Martin.  RMT strikes and why they’re striking.  Other Unions and problems workers are facing.  Covid and working from home.  Cuts to Civil Services. RMT strike and General Secretary Mick Lynch.  Cost of living crisis – what’s causing it?  Outsourcing.  PMQs Dominic Raab vs Angela Rayner – RMT strike.  Years of austerity since 2008. Civil service union warns of strike over Boris Johnson’s plan to cut 91,000 jobs PCS leader says members have reached ‘tipping point’ after PM’s combative move The biggest civil service union has warned of strike action over Boris Johnson’s “P&O-style” approach to cutting 91,000 Whitehall jobs, with ministers also seeking to reduce staff redundancy terms by up to a third. The plan to cut one in five civil service jobs caused alarm and dismay across government departments, after Johnson told his cabinet to spend the next month finding ways to cut the civil service back to pre-Brexit levels within three years. He claimed it was necessary to shrink the size of central government to tackle the cost of living crisis. The combative move by Johnson, briefed to the Daily Mail, comes on top of existing civil service anger over pay increases less than half of the current 7% rate of inflation, the Cabinet Office drive to get them back into the office and overwork from Covid backlogs. At the same time, ministers have told trade unions they are also trying to return to previously defeated plans to cut redundancy packages in the civil service by up to 33%. In a further shake-up, Steve Barclay, the Cabinet Office minister and No 10 chief of staff, said all senior civil service jobs would in future have to be advertised externally as well as internally. While taking on the civil service, Johnson made a fresh call to get employees in the public and private sector back to the office after the pandemic. The government had previously said it was up to businesses to figure out where their workforces should be based. But in an interview with the Daily Mail, he said: “We need to get back into the habit of getting into the office. I believe people are more productive, more energetic, more full of ideas, when they are surrounded by other people. “My experience of working from home is you spend an awful lot of time making another cup of coffee, and then you know, getting up, walking very slowly to the fridge, hacking off a small piece of cheese, then walking very slowly back to your laptop and then forgetting what it was you’re doing.” Mark Serwotka, the general secretary of the Public and Commercial Services (PCS) union, representing about 180,000 public sector workers, warned that the civil service had reached the “tipping point” of national strike action being realistic. “We have our conference in 10 days’ time where I’m as certain as I can be that we will move to a national strike ballot, probably in September,” he said. He said the civil service was already struggling with backlogs of passports, driving licences, court cases, and pension payments due to “chronic understaffing and a recruitment crisis”. “Six weeks ago we were all outraged about P&O and now half a million civil servants have woken up to the media saying one in five jobs must go,” he added, referring to P&O Ferries’ recent sacking of nearly 800 crew. Dave Penman, the general secretary of the FDA union, which represents 19,000 senior civil servants, said it had been like a “kind of P&O: civil servants finding out about one in five jobs having to go via the Daily Mail” and that the 91,000 number had been “plucked out of thin air”. Kevin Brandstatter, a national officer at the GMB union, which represents a large number of Ministry of Justice staff, said: “This is a complete bombshell for the civil service and it’s not clear yet where the axe will fall. But if the cuts hit GMB members in the Ministry of Justice it will have a massive impact on legal aid and everyone’s right to proper representation.” Permanent secretaries wrote to their departments on Friday, with some expressing regret at the way the news of cuts had been conveyed. Jim Harra, the permanent secretary at HM Revenue and Customs, sent a message to staff saying: “I am sorry that you have learned this from the media rather than from me or civil service leaders.”…

Ex Labour MP Chris Williamson, from Resist UK, on what he would do if he was Chancellor Rishi Sunak. ‘People’s Great Reset’. Simple structural changes for industrial planning and UK wealth redistribution. Training and development in jobs.  Flattening the pyramid. PMQs Dominic Raab vs Angela Rayner – Tories are militant.  Getting rid of right to protest.  Education.  Rebuilding socialism outside of Labour In this third article of a three-part series – former Corbyn staffer Phil Bevin looks at the prospects for real change – and how to achieve it outside a Labour party whose regime no longer represents even the vaguest idea of genuine socialism Real, lasting change doesn’t come from negotiating for crumbs from the establishment’s table but working with communities to help them claim power for themselves. This means talking to people, finding out their concerns, and campaigning to ensure that the holders of power are held to account, and the system they serve contested at elections. In large parts of the country, this kind of activism is impossible to achieve through the Labour Party because its representatives are the local establishment. Many of us who are trying to contribute to progressive change end up fighting against the Labour Party. ‘Labour and its associated culture of managerialism should be allowed to die’ For instance, I live in Birmingham, where Labour controls the City Council. Despite having £500 million in reserve, at least £50 million of which is unallocated, the housing conditions are appalling, even slum-like. Flats suffer from damp, cockroach infestations, urine in lifts, and overcrowding. It should be a scandal, but Momentum and the Labour left have done nothing to address it, perhaps because highlighting the problems would mean damaging the image of the party they represent. Even worse, at election time, Momentum and the Labour left will most likely be out knocking on doors urging people to vote for the very Councillors that presided over this misery. For socialism to thrive in my area and elsewhere, Labour and its associated culture of establishment approved managerialism should be allowed to die….

Talking of fake socialists… Boycott of Mayor Marvin’s Press briefings – since Local Democracy Reporters banned When the Post’s other LDR Adam Postans asked to attend the next briefing he was told LDRs were now not allowed to attend, in a move that has been branded as “anti-democratic” by the National Union of Journalists. The council has since denied the claim, saying LDRs have not been banned from the briefings but that it was part of a “long-standing agreement” for them not to attend. However, that did not stop the BBC, Bristol World and Bristol 24/7 as well as Bristol Live saying they would boycott future meetings until the LDRs are allowed to attend. The local democracy reporting service sees the BBC fund 165 local democracy reporters across the UK to report on local authorities in partner newsrooms, like Bristol Live. A BBC spokesperson said: “We are deeply disappointed by the decision taken by the mayor’s office to not allow the Bristol LDR into his fortnightly press conference. “It is an essential ingredient of local democracy that journalists should be able to ask robust, challenging questions to people in power. “We have today informed the mayor that the BBC won’t be attending the fortnightly mayoral briefings until this important issue is resolved. We will continue to report on the city council and mayor as normal by attending all other meetings.” Bristol Live senior editor Pete Gavan told Press Gazette it was “great to get this support” in boycotting the mayoral briefings and challenged the council’s claim that they had agreed not to send LDRs. Instead, according to Gavan, they had said they would send other reporters “when possible” but reserve the right to send LDRs. “We do not accept that any reporters should be banned from attending meetings at the behest of the council, nor from asking relevant questions on behalf of our readers and council taxpayers at any time,” he added. The National Union of Journalists’ Reach national coordinator Chris Morley argued that the actions of the council were “arrogant, high-handed, and essentially anti-democratic” and said “the slur it implies on the professionalism of our LDR members is thoroughly rejected”. Bristol24/7 editor Martin Booth said it was a “slippery slope” if journalists let the council choose who “they want to attend briefings and who they want to exclude”. He added: “Marvin Rees has previously said that his motto is ‘ask me anything’. I hope that he will live up to that motto and lift this ban on LDRs. Until that happens, Bristol24/7 will neither be attending nor covering any mayoral press conferences.”

5 year decline in trust of media – Press Gazette Five-year decline in UK news media trust sees BBC, Times and Telegraph have biggest drops – The Times, The Telegraph and the BBC have suffered the biggest drops in trust among UK news media over the past five years, according to one annual survey. The Times was named the most trusted UK newspaper brand in 2018 but has since seen trust fall by 20 percentage points to 43%, according Press Gazette analysis of annual data from the Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. The BBC also saw a 20 percentage point drop in trust since 2018, although its fall from 75% to 55% still leaves it as the most trusted news brand in the UK, jointly with ITV News and just ahead of Channel 4 News on 54%. A BBC spokesperson said: Although we are never complacent, our own independent research shows that we saw a boost to perceptions of BBC News trustworthiness and impartiality during the pandemic, and BBC News is the source adults in the UK are most likely to turn to for impartial news on the biggest news stories of the day.  Meanwhile, The Telegraph saw a 19 percentage point drop, from 55% of consumers saying they trusted its output in 2018 to 36% in 2022, as it maintained its position as the least trusted broadsheet in the UK.

Nicola Sturgeon and another Scottish referendum.  PMQs deportation charter flights of immigrants. ‘Completely illegal!’ Nicola Sturgeon facing ‘political suicide’ over second referendum NICOLA STURGEON is facing “political suicide” over her planned second independence referendum, a commentator has claimed, saying the vote may be “completely illegal”. Former Scottish Conservative councillor Tony Miklinski said Ms Sturgeon “knows perfectly well” a second referendum is not going to be granted by a Conservative Government, bringing its legality into “severe doubt”. He said Ms Sturgeon is “boxing herself into an almost impossible situation”, as she has “always said” she won’t hold an illegal referendum. Mr Miklinski warned the Scottish First Minister it would be “political suicide” to lose the vote. Earlier this week, Ms Sturgeon said she plans to hold a referendum on October 19 2023, despite the UK Government so far refusing to grant Scotland permission to do so. In January 2020, Boris Johnson refused Scotland permission to hold another referendum, describing the 2014 vote as a “once in a generation” event. But Ms Sturgeon has said plans are underway to ensure the Scottish parliament could proceed with a vote lawfully. On Tuesday, she announced Scotland’s top law officer, Lord Advocate Dorothy Bain, had asked the Supreme Court for a decision on whether an advisory second referendum could be within Holyrood’s powers.

Bitchute video of complete show

Part Two – Ukraine/Covid/Climate Round-Up With End Times Prophecy Reports

War in Ukraine.  Rocket in shopping centre – not Russian? Western reporting of war written in Kiev.  Erdogan says Sweden and Finland joining NATO could be blocked if memorandum isn’t followed.  NATO want to widen the conflict.  Isolation of West.  NATO false flag tactics. Is Russias Bombing of the Mall in Kremanchuk Another False Atrocity Story Being Used to Justify Ongoing Military Intervention in Ukraine? Empty mall parking lot and existence of a munitions plant nearby raise questions about official narrative advanced in mainstream U.S. media On Tuesday June 28, mainstream media outlets reported that at least 18 people were killed and dozens injured in a Russian missile strike on a crowded shopping mall in the central Ukrainian city of Kremenchuk on Monday. Thirty-six other people were said to be missing and a survivor was on record saying that she had been shopping with her husband when the blast threw her into the air. The Associated Press, Reuters, The New York Times, NPR and other news outlets reporting on the story used Ukrainian government officials as their primary source, notably Mayor Vitaliy Maletskiywho wrote on Facebook that the attack hit a very crowded area, which is 100% certain not to have any links to the armed forces. But they made no independent investigation as to the truth of the self-serving statement. Also without verification they quoted Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskywho said in a Telegram post that the number of victims was unimaginable, and cited reports that more than 1,000 civilians were inside at the time of the attack.  However, other reports contradict Zelensky and suggest that the Russian missile attack in Kremenchuk is just one more false story about alleged Russian atrocities known to have been fabricated by Ukraines very active propaganda mill….

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pGhNVcdhGyg

Naomi Wolf and Naomi Klein twitter spat.  Naomi Wolf on the Mark Steyn show on GB News – companies benefiting from Covid vaccines and lockdowns.  Online Safety Bill.  Lord Frost – bill should be scrapped – Mail.  Institute of Economic Affairs –  report on Online Safety Bill concluding freedom of speech is threatened –

The scope of the Bill is “breathtaking”, and raises significant issues for free speech, privacy and innovation. The establishment of safety duties, under the threat of multi-billion pound fines and criminal sanctions, risks digital platforms using automated tools in a cautious and censorious manner. This will embolden bad faith actors to seek content removals. The Secretary of State and Ofcom will have unprecedented powers to define and limit speech, with limited parliamentary or judicial oversight. The definition of harmful speech can be easily expanded through a statutory instrument, depending on the priorities of the incumbent Secretary of State. For example, the Shadow DCMS Secretary Lucy Powell clearly envisages an extension of the notion of ‘harmful’ to cover matters of public policy debate, having raised concerns that the Bill would allow ‘climate deniers’ to ‘slip through the net’. Privacy risks are raised by encouraging or requiring identity and age verification and proactive monitoring of user content by platforms. The Bill even applies this to private messaging, like WhatsApp. The Bill’s byzantine requirements will impose large regulatory costs, particularly on start-ups and smaller companies, and make it riskier to host content and develop innovative services. This risks discouraging investment, and cementing the market position of ‘Big Tech’ companies who can afford to comply. The impact assessment estimates that the Bill will cost businesses £2.5 billion over the first ten years, but this underestimates the direct costs (it claims legal fees are just £39.23 per hour) and does not even attempt to assess the potential costs to innovation, competition or international trade. There is a lack of evidence to justify the legislation, with respect to both the alleged prevalence of what the Bill treats as ‘harm’ and the link between the proposed measures and the desired objectives.

Online safety bill could impose ‘unprecedented’ censorship powers A new briefing paper by free market think tank the Institute of Economic Affairs (IEA) says the government’s flagship online safety bill will have a significant impact on free speech, privacy and innovation. The paper highlights the broad scope, complexity and reach of the bill, at over 255 pages, an increase of 110 pages since the May 2021 draft. The bill’s proposed establishment of safety duties, under the threat of multi-billion pound fines and criminal sanctions, risks digital platforms using automated tools in a cautious and censorious manner. This will embolden bad faith actors to seek content removals. The IEA also say the bill’s “byzantine” requirements will impose large regulatory costs, particularly on start-ups and smaller companies, and make it riskier to host content and develop innovative services. This could discourage investment, and cement the market position of “Big Tech” companies who can afford to comply. The impact assessment estimates that the bill will cost businesses £2.5 billion over the first ten years. However this underestimates the direct costs by claiming legal fees are just £39.23 per hour, and does not attempt to assess the potential costs to innovation, competition or international trade. There is a lack of evidence to justify the legislation, with respect to both the alleged prevalence of what the bill treats as “harm” and the link between the proposed measures and the desired objectives. The paper claims that the bill’s new duties will impose unprecedented censorship on lawful speech, through removal of suspected illegal content to ensure compliance and duties in relation to content that is allegedly harmful but not illegal. Platforms like Facebook, YouTube and Twitter will be expected to take action against speech if they “reasonably consider” it could be illegal, a significantly lower standard then “beyond reasonable doubt”. If they fail to do so, the companies can be fined up to 10 per cent of global revenue. The new harms-based communication offence in the bill outlaws intentionally causing psychological distress. The IEA say this risks empowering the easily offended and bad faith actors to solicit removals of legal speech from platforms. The Secretary of State will be able to direct Ofcom to change codes of practice “for reasons of public policy” and will set Ofcom’s priorities. Ofcom, through codes of conduct, will be able to decide what content could be “harmful” and thus set, and therefore potentially limit, the bounds of online free speech. The report argues that the bill’s free speech protections are very weak – the bill only establishes a duty on platforms to “have regard” to the importance of protecting users’ freedom of expression. Shadow DCMS Secretary Lucy Powell has even envisaged an extension of the notion of “harmful” to cover matters of public policy debate, having raised concerns that the bill would allow “climate deniers” to “slip through the net”.

Lilani Dowding on the Mark Steyn show, GB News – ‘The online harms bill is just so dangerous to free speech’ | Leilani Dowding reacts to bill – vaccine injury and fact checkers.  Study into myocarditis and pericarditis after MRNa Covid vaccines  Healthy young people are dying suddenly and unexpectedly from a mysterious syndromeas doctors seek answers through a new national register People aged under the age of 40 being urged to go and get their hearts checked May potentially be at risk of having Sudden Adult Death Syndrome (SADS) SADS is an ‘umbrella term to describe unexpected deaths in young people’ A 31-year-old woman who died in her sleep last year may have had SADs

Vladimir Zelenko, Trump’s Doctor, dies – contribution Covid made to the collapse of US Super Power – spiritual dimension to his work and the miracle of life. Dr. Vladimir Zelenko, who touted unconventional COVID treatment, dies at 49 US physician, who served as Kiryas Joel community doctor for decades before parting ways, rose to fame in 2020 when his virus treatment was endorsed by then-president Trump American family physician Dr. Vladimir “Zev” Zelenko, who rose to fame during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic by promoting an unconventional treatment for the virus, died on Thursday after battling cancer for several years. He was 49. elenko, an Orthodox Jew born in Kyiv, moved to the United States with his family at the age of three, settling in Brooklyn, New York City. He received his medical degree from the State University of New York at Buffalo in 2000. He had served as the community doctor of Kiryas Joel, a town north of New York City, for nearly two decades, and was regarded by many as a beloved member of the community. In May 2020, however, he said he was leaving the Kiryas Joel community, where he had practiced medicine for years, following a fall-out with community leaders who publicly spoke out about his approach to the pandemic. Zelenko had developed the “Zelenko Protocol,” an experimental treatment for COVID-19 ­ consisting of the anti-malarial medication hydroxychloroquine, the antibiotic azithromycin, and zinc sulfate ­ and claimed to have successfully treated hundreds of patients using the three-drug combination over the course of five days.

Henry Widdas, Journalist, on NUJ’s work of protecting Journalists though Covid – and Julian Assange. 

Piers Corbyn went to Just Stop Oil protest to convince them they’re wrong – CO2 follows climate change – article that explains why Piers Corbyn and ‘Freedom Five’ fined for breaching Covid-19 rules during anti-lockdown protests Piers Corbyn has been fined after breaching Covid-19 restrictions during a series of anti-lockdown protests in central London last year. The 75-year-old brother of former Labour leader Jeremy was found guilty at Westminster Magistrates’ Court on Wednesday of participating in four different gatherings of more people than restrictions allowed at the time between August 29 and December 31 2020. He was fined £750 and had to pay £275 in prosecution costs and £109 in surcharges following the incidents in Trafalgar Square, Westminster and South Bank, the Metropolitan Police said. The offences involved gatherings of more than 30 people at a time when regulations stated no-one could participate in groups of more than six outdoors unless certain exemptions applied. Fellow protesters Vincent Dunmall, 55, from Orpington, south-east London, and Louise Creffield, 36, of Brighton, were also found guilty of taking part in three of the gatherings between August 29 and October 24 2020.

Radio4All download pages
COMPLETE SHOW AND FULL INTERVIEWS
[right click to download]
#1 – Complete 3hr show – [right click to download]
Full interviews with…
#2 Chris Williamson Cost of Living Economics & Ukraine 00:30:00
#3 Piers Corbyn Freedom Five Case Just Stop Oil Coal Gas 00:10:00
#4 RIP Dr. Vladimir Zelenko on God & Poison Death Jab 01:00:00
#5 Henry Widdas Tony Gosling on Censorship Covid NUJ HTL & Assange 01:30:00

Enclosure For Empire: Witchcraft, Freemasonry and Oliver Cromwell

Enclosure For Empire: Witchcraft, Freemasonry and Oliver Cromwell

The ‘Bankrupt Brewer of Huntingdon’, and Solomon’s Temple: an untold story of the English Civil War, by Tony Gosling

STROUD 22Jun22 – Certain facts about the origins of the 1642-49 English Civil war have been established by historians and University departments over the centuries. Central are the grievances over Charles’s arbitrary rule and ‘three monopolies’ of church, printing and trade, that so stifled enterprise and free thought.

But what if there were a ‘third factor’, carefully concealed by wealthy merchants who were on the cusp of exploiting the New World? ‘Dark forces’ with a hidden agenda sniffed at by establishment historians then and now, because to raise it might threaten their reputations, their careers? Just such a possibility has in fact been creeping out, ‘given legs’ since WWII, in the works of Christopher Hill, Henry Brailsford, Pauline Gregg, John Robinson, Stephen Knight and Martin Short.

These writers represent two new perspectives on the seventeenth century battle between the feudal and merchant classes in England that was to have enormous repercussions across the world, not least of which was laying the foundatons for the acquisition of the biggest empire the world has ever seen.

Hill and Brailsford writing and researching in the 1956s and 1970s represent the post-war socialist culture finding its feet and reinterpreting social history, much research from original writings being made public for the first time. Their books tease out the social struggles and aspirations of the vast majority of England’s illiterate poor who had no voice yet were seeing their rights to land and livelihood and freedom of worship being corralled as they were made destitute by eviction and rabid anti-Catholicism.

In the 1970s and 80s insiders were saying Freemasonry was becoming less Christian, more sinister. Darker leaders were allegedly creeping in and whistleblowers began to speak out. These disclosures fell on fertile soil because publishing and broadcasting was in the middle of taboo-breaking couple of decades. Stephen Knight and Martin Short were writing in the 1980s about Freemasonry, complex deceptions and links into all aspects of power, at the highest offices of state and the criminal justice system were exposed.

Before tackling Freemasonry head on, Knight’s 1976 book ‘Jack the Ripper the Final Solution’ suggested prostitutes deaths had been ordered by the royal family after they received blackmail threats. The eldest son of king Edward VII, heir to the throne Prince Albert Victor, had been experimenting with prostitutes as a teenager, given one a child and married her under a pseudonym.

Due to the Masonic nature of the cover-up, Knight became a focus for 1970/80s Masons, disgruntled over more recent injustices within the craft. In 1984 the product of that research ‘The Brotherhood’ was published but Stephen Knight died shortly afterwards in 1985 aged 34. Journalist Martin Short was handed several boxes of unread correspondence Knight had received from readers and published his own, bigger, sequel ‘Inside The Brotherhood, Further Secrets of the Freemasons’ in 1989.

Freemasonry being a re-branding of the banned medieval Knights Templar cult is probably best detailed in John Robinson’s book ‘Born In Blood’ (1989). During the same period of relative press freedom Christian converts from secret black and white witch covens reported identical wording in the oaths of Masonic initiation rituals: promises of secrecy on pain of death, even methods of execution of ‘offenders’.

The Vatican’s inability, or unwillingness, to try accusations of witchcraft had been one of the many reformation grievances. As Henry VIII finally wrenched English Christendom away from Rome in December 1633, over the marriage to Anne Boleyn, the English church began a popularisation and freeing-up of Christian doctrine and practice which included dealing much more directly with accusations of witchcraft.

This took place over the century or so between the reformation and English civil war as a spiritual battle raged to deal with evidence of divination and sorcery which the Vatican had swept under the carpet. This extension of the crown’s judicial powers also provided ‘cover’ for Thomas Cromwell’s hostile takeover of the monasteries, and execution of several abbots, to which the king owed vast sums of money.

A look beyond the turbulent John Dee’s empire plan, Witch trials and Enclosure does seem to confirm this interpretation of secret societies in a kind of spiritual battle behind the scenes for legislative influence which will benefit them, running up to the power to hire and fire the monarch.

Between the outing of the Templars, and Elizabeth I, came the too-little studied nor understood Wars of the Roses. Understood as a battle for succession between the houses of York and Lancaster it can also be seen as the ultimately fruitless attempt to crush the Lancastrian power of the secretive Garter Knights. It was only with the coming of the 1485 Battle of Bosworth that this argument was finally settled in the garter knights favour. Sporadic bands of possibly state-sponsored brigands that had been roaming a lawless country for over a century were apprehended, and the English countryside was allowed to return to a reasonably peaceful existence.

Similarly after the 1688 ‘Glorious Revolution’ there was a considerable reservoir of learned noble distrust of the new protestant kings, considered illegitimate usurpers by the ‘Jacobites’. The name referred to King James and the Bible-believing Stuart line which had been overthrown by these ‘dark forces’. This even extended in 1745 to a great march to attack London by the Highlanders and their allies which, probably wisely, was abandoned in Derby and returned home.

It should not come as a great surprise that Freemasonry might be lurking behind machinations of the English Civil War since the idea was prominent in some seventeenth and eighteenth century accounts and illustrations. But this aspect has become less prominent today because mainstream historians tell us Freemasonry only emerged in England in 1717.

‘Emerged’ is the word, because ‘philanthropist’ Elias Ashmole proudly records his own 1646 initiation into freemasonry at Warrington in his memoirs. So we know ‘the craft’ was active underground from at least the civil war period in England. Was the 1717 deception an attempt to conceal some role Freemasonry’s hidden networks of power had in the overthrow of Charles I, and the later usurping of James Stuart’s throne in 1688 by ‘puritan’ William of Orange?

Timeline

  • 1118 – The Vatican founds the Knights Templar after the First Crusade
  • 1154 – The Great Schism as rival pontiffs from the Roman and Orthodox churches split
  • 1204 – Sacking of Orthodox Constantinople led by Knights Templar of the Vatican’s Fourth Crusade
  • Friday 13th October 1307 – French King Philip the Fair orders arrest of the Templars for denying Christ, homosexuality, worshipping idols plus other blasphemies and heresies.
  • 1312 – Templar Order is extinguished by the Vatican and banning decrees issued by European kings. Property is transferred to the Knights Hospitaller, today known as the Knights of Malta. Templars now have to go underground, under false names staying in secret network of ‘safe houses’ known as ‘lodges’.
  • 1348 – Order of the Garter is created by Edward III at Woodstock, Oxfordshire with 26 knights. Legend is the motto ‘Shame on anyone who thinks this is evil’, originated when the Countess of Salisbury, dancing with the king, dropped her garter and he gallantly picked it up. However in her 1921 anthropological study of witchcraft Margaret Murray says the garter is a hidden emblem of a witchcraft high priestess, indicating control of a coven of 13, and that the king may have been demonstrating his support for her.
  • 1381 – Peasant’s Revolt believed to have been orchestrated by the underground Templars to threaten the boy-King Richard II and regain or destroy property lost seventy years previously when they were extinguished.
  • 1411 – Foundation of London’s Guildhall, bringing medieval guilds together, leading to increased insularity and profiteering through shared monopolistic practices. Guilds had been getting more formalised and secretive over the previous 200 years or so with oaths of initiation to protect the secrets of their craft. Livery Companies began to dominate the political and economic life of the City of London through monopolistic practices and controlling apprenticeships. In the 21st Century there remain 84 City companies, the ‘Great Twelve’ Mercers, Grocers, Drapers, Fishmongers, Goldsmiths, Skinners, Merchant-Taylors, Haberdashers, Salters, Ironmongers, Vintners, Clothworkers and 72 minor companies.
  • 1446 – Rosslyn Chapel is built in Midlothian, Southeast of ex-Templar Port Edinburgh by Sir William St Clair. Architecture hints at Templar influences and pillars depict plants only known in the Americas, which weren’t supposed to have been discovered until fifty years afterwards.
  • 1455-1487 – Wars of the Roses dynastic battles over thirty years tied up with England losing control of French territories with sides symbolised by the white Lancastrian and red Yorkshire five-pointed roses, sometimes depicted as white within red as the Tudor Rose. Because the five-petalled rose is a form of hexagram some have suggested that it represents the merging of Lancastrian and Yorkist covens. Wars culminate both dynastically, in the 1486 marriage of Henry VII to Elisabeth of York, eldest daughter of Edward IV, and militarily in the 1487 Battle of Bosworth where Henry Tudor’s Yorkist rival Richard III is killed.
  • 1489 – Depopulation Act ‘Against Pulling Down Of Towns’ under Henry VII
  • 1492-97 – So-called discovery of South America and Caribbean by Christopher Columbus who sailed from Palos de la Frontera in Spain and North America by John Cabot sailing out of Bristol. There is much evidence that the ancient Phoenicians traded across the Atlantic, that some Europeans were aware of the ‘New World’ and that these voyages may have simply made public what elites already knew, to prepare Europeans for coming centuries of colonisation.
  • 1515 – Royal Proclamation ‘Against Engrossing Of Farms’ under Henry VIII
  • 1516 – Depopulation Act
  • 1516, 1518 and 1519 – Royal Anti-Enclosure Commissions
  • 1534 – Sheep Farming Restraining Act
  • 1536 – Two Depopulation Acts
  • 1536 – 1541 – The English Reformation is beginning in earnest with a frontal attack on the commercial operations of the church. Dissolution of the Monasteries by Oliver Cromwell’s great-great grandfather and Henry VIII’s chief minister Thomas Cromwell – 900 religious business institutions are ‘nationalised’ and sold off. 12,000 in religious orders are sacked as the debt the crown owes to the great monastic institutions, tens of billions of pounds in 2020 money, is cancelled. With Luther and Calvin’s wider ‘Reformation’ comes a tacit encouragement of Freemason lodges, as secret ‘speakeasies’ until emerging officially into public view 180 years or so later.
  • 1542 – Henry VIII passes England’s first capital Witchcraft Act removing jurisdiction from the Vatican’s church courts to the crown courts and assizes.
  • 1549, Jul-Aug – Kett’s Rebellion in Norfolk over enclosure. East Anglia ruled for seven weeks from under an oak tree by Robert Kett and 16,000 peasants. Enclosers locked up in Norwich jail for ‘stealing the land’. King Edward VI’s army is twice turned back by the rebels, is then reinforced and defeats them.
  • 1552 and 1555 Depopulation Acts
  • 1563 – Depopulation Act repeals all four 1526, 1552 and 1555 Acts as ineffective. Acknowledged or not, this was probably because the administration of all previous acts and commissions since 1489 were in the hands of the landed classes who were profiting personally from enclosure.
  • 1563 – Post-Reformation ‘Witchcraft Act’, passed in Scotland, makes witchcraft, or consulting with witches, a capital crime.
  • 1563 – Elizabeth I’s Witchcraft Act reduces penalties for witchcraft except it remains a capital offence for those proven also to have caused harm.
  • 1577 – John Dee privately publishes his clandestine vision for the ascendancy of a projected British Empire, advised by Christopher Hatton and Robert Dudley, for Elizabeth I in ‘General and Rare Memorials Pertayning to the Perfect Arte of Navigation’. Though part of Dee’s plan, Elizabeth claims privateers Francis Drake, Walter Raleigh and John Hawkins are not working for the crown. [FFI see articles by Alex Grover, National Maritime Museum, Greenwich]
  • 1580 – Sir Francis Drake circumnavigates the world.
  • 1581-1795 – Calvinist ‘Dutch Republic’, where Catholics are persecuted. It is to play a major role in providing finance and military expertise to Cromwell during the English civil war. Following the 1660 restoration of Charles II the Dutch republic resumes harrying England’s Catholic kings with the 1665 Monmouth rebellion and much better funded 1688 ‘Glorious revolution’ which finally deposes the Stuart line and imposes a violently anti-Catholic regime.
  • 1590-92 –  North Berwick witch trials in which Agnes Sampson, Geillis Duncan and schoolmaster Dr John Fian were accused of being members of a coven at St Andrews’ Auld Kirk. Around 100 people were accused including Francis Stewart, 5th Earl of Bothwell and other gentry. It’s unclear how many the juries found guilty or were executed.
  • 1593 – Two final Depopulation Acts passed
  • 1597 – James VI of Scotland publishes his ‘Daemonologie’ purporting to detail practices and enable identification of witches.
  • 1600 – Incorporation of the East India Company which began controlling trade for empire in Bengal, India and the far east.
  • 1603, 24 March – James I ascends to the throne of England  having been James VI of Scotland for 36 years, uniting the two monarchies.
  • 1604 – James I passes a stricter Witchcraft Act reversing Elizabeth I’s leniency. It is enforced by self-styled ‘Witchfinder General’ Matthew Hopkins.
  • 1604-1607 active enclosure revolts in Northamptonshire, Bedfordshire, Buckinghamshire, Huntingdonshire, Leicestershire, Lincolnshire and Warwickshire, culminating in 1607 in armed revolt under a leader with the pseudonym ‘Captain Pouch’. Forty or fifty rebels out of a rag-tag-army of about a thousand peasants are shot dead at Newton by a ‘body of mounted gentlemen with their servants’, while several others are hanged and quartered.
  • 1605, 05 November – Gunpowder plot orchestrated by Lord Salisbury to test James I and justify persecution of Catholics
  • 1607 – the term ‘Leveller’ is heard for the first time as organised anti-enclosure gangs emerge and ‘riots’ spread around the counties of Northamptonshire, Warwickshire and Leicestershire.
  • 1607 – 1636 the governments of James I and Charles I set themselves against John Dee’s covert empire-building by pursuing an active anti-enclosure policy.
  • 1611 – Publication of King James’ Authorised Version of The Bible, commissioned in 1604 and still recognised as one of the most accurate..
  • 1612, 18-19 August – Pendle witch trials culminating in nine hangings for Maleficium (causing injury by divination) of some self-confessed coven-members on 20th August.
  • 1620 – Voyage of The Mayflower from Plymouth to Cape Cod setting up the first official North American colony.
  • 1625, 27 March – Charles I ascends the British throne on death of James I
  • 1626 June – Parliament impeaches Charles I’s friend and adviser George Villiers, 2nd Duke of Buckingham so Charles quickly dissolves Parliament.
  • 1629-1640 – ‘Eleven years Tyranny’ as Charles I attempts to rule without Parliament
  • 1629-1640 – The Providence Island Company, with John Pym MP as treasurer,  becomes the organisational base for mercantile Puritan opposition to the king and his attempts to rule without parliament. Supposedly set up to open trade with Spanish in Latin America the company becomes a centre for domestic legal, political and military opposition to Charles I. Located 150 miles east of Nicaragua’s Mosquito Coast Providence island is ostensibly a model Puritan colony but is used by English Privateers as a base from which to attack Spanish shipping. The Phoenicians (2500-500BC)  had also used offshore islands to manage trade and as a base to operate against territories they wished to control.
  • 1630 – Justices of five midland counties are ordered to remove all enclosures made in the previous two years
  • 1632, 1635 and 1636 – Three Royal Anti-Enclosure Commissions levy huge compositions, or fines, on those who have enclosed land in  contravention of Depopulation Acts. Charles I levies total of £50,000 ‘compositions’, or fines, as a penalty for depopulation and evictions from 1633 to 1638, some of which are retrospective. Equivalent in 2020 of around £2.2 billion.
  • 1635 – Supposedly converted to Christianity Portuguese-Jewish merchant Antonio Fernandez Carvajal moves to London’s Leadenhall Street as the first endenizened, or naturalised, English Jew for nearly 200 years. His ships trade to the East and West Indies, Brazil, and Levant in gunpowder, wine, hides, pictures, cochineal and corn. Plus he has lucrative government contracts to supply the army with corn and an additional £100,000 annual turnover of silver. Carvajal also brings with him a vast intelligence network of paid informers, of use to any army.
  • 1635 – Charles imposes Ship Money tax to finance the Royal Navy on inland towns and cities which had previously levied only on ports.
  • 13 April – 5 May 1640 – ‘Short Parliament’ summoned by Charles I which insisted on grievances against the king being addressed before voting him any money. Charles then promptly dissolved it.
  • November 1640 – December 1648 – ‘Long Parliament’ elected. Earl of Strafford (d. May 1641), Cottington, Sir John Finch (escaped to Holland) and Archbishop Laud (d. 1645), who have been running the country for the king, are impeached and either executed or escaped into exile until the restoration.
  • November 1641 – Parliament states its demands that the king strictly purge the church of England of all ‘Roman Catholic tenancies’ in the ‘Grand Remonstrance’ drafted by Puritan John Pym.
  • On 4th January 1642 king Charles attempts to arrest the ‘five members’ John Pym, John Hampden, Arthur Hesilrige, Denzil Holles and William Strode for treason. Charles had first gone to the House of Lords demanding they arrest the MPs for him. After a short debate the Lords refused and so Charles and his accompanying guard of soldiers had to go into the Commons themselves to make the arrests. Charles utters the opening line of the English Civil War, “All the birds are flown” and humiliated, leaves London. We now know the five members were already safely hidden in the City of London, which had probably been tipped off by a spy at court.
  • 10 June 1642 – Charles I is forced to leave London for Oxford, establishing his rule in other parts of the country with a virtual line of his support running roughly from Southampton up to Hull. Roughly 1/3 of MPs and the majority of Lords support the king.
  • 22nd August 1642 – Charles raises his standard at Nottingham hoping loyal aristocracy will support him against Parliament. Later in the month Parliament orders al theatres closed.
  • 23rd October 1642 – Battle of Edge Hill between Banbury and Stratford-on-Avon in Warwickshire proves indecisive with around 15,000 troops on each side.
  • 20 September 1643 – First Battle of Newbury in Berkshire again proves indecisive as the King tries and fails to stop Essex returning to London from Gloucester.
  • 2nd July 1644 – Battle of Marston Moor is a decisive Parliamentary victory near York. Prince Rupert, for the King, took on Cromwell and Fairfax with Edward Manchester in command of the parliamentary army. Confusion reigned on both sides that day but Manchester grabbed the initiative, routing the royalist army inflicting crippling losses, with 4,000 of Charles’ fighting men killed and 1,500 captured. Manchester’s decisive performance as a general that day led to conflict with Cromwell later that year over the conduct of the war. Manchester was dismissed, eventually opposing the trial of Charles I from sidelines.
  • February 1645: Sums of money which prove to be decisive are spent over the winter refashioning the parliamentary army for what proved to be the decisive 1645 fighting season. Parliament’s New Model Army of 20,000 soldiers is better equipped, disciplined and trained.
  • 14 June 1645 – Battle of Naseby, South of Market Harborough, is the final decisive defeat of the English Civil War. Charles I joined Prince Rupert to command 7,500 cavaliers, who faced around 14,000 New Model Army Roundheads led by Cromwell and Fairfax. 5,000 royalist soldiers are captured leaving Charles’ forces in the midlands decimated and the cities of Leicester, Chester and Winchester all saw the writing on the wall, surrendering to parliament.
  • 10th July 1645 Langport in Somerset saw the Royalists’ final strategic military defeat. Soldiers of Charles’ supporters in the South West were defeated by Fairfax and his well-organised, City of London resourced, army. Bristol merchants had been independent royalists, and remained so until the following September when, under siege, they surrendered England’s second city to the roundheads. So furious was Cromwell with Bristol for holding an independent line against his merchant forces, he had his engineers level the city’s historic castle with explosives after the war.
  • July 1645: Leveller pamphleteer Lt. Col. John Lilburne is arrested
  • Elizabeth Lilburne women’s petition to parliament
  • 1646 – in his memoirs Elias Ashmole records his initiation into freemasonry at Warrington sixty years before Freemasonry is supposed to exist in England
  • 12 November 1646 – Charles I loses the battle of Newark and is taken into custody by the Scottish army
  • January 1647 – Scots deliver Charles over to parliament for the sum of £100,000
  • June 1647 – trouble at’ mill – Cromwell settles with army agitators
  • June and July 1647 – letters pass between Oliver Cromwell and Amsterdam’s Mulheim Synagogue financier Ebenezer Pratt about Jews being readmitted to England in exchange for his financial support and advice.
  • 11 November 1647 – Charles is deliberately allowed to escape from Hampton Court for pro-Cromwell dramatic effect and makes his way to the Isle Of Wight, from where he plans to escape to France. IoW governor Colonel Robert Hammond is not so sympathetic as Charles had hoped and he is re-imprisoned in Carisbrooke castle.
  • August 1648 King Charles I is taken prisoner.
  • September 1648 – In his pamphlet ‘Les Francs-Maçons Écrasés’ (1774) French Catholic priest Abbé Larudan alleges Cromwell, realising his own life will be forfeit if negotiations for peace with Charles proceed, forms a witchcraft cell to push through the execution Charles, under Masonic guise. The inauguration takes place at a location in King’s Street, St. James, London over two evening meetings four days apart. Named as present are Oliver Cromwell, his son-in-law Henry Ireton, Algernon Sidney, a Mr. Newell, Martin Wildeman, James Harrington (colonel of the London trained bands), George Monck Parliamentary commander-in-chief Thomas Fairfax along with many others. The ‘holy spirit’ is said to have visited Cromwell during the intervening days to affirm god’s support for him and his group. The ostensible aim is the rebuilding of ‘proper Christian order’ and once they have been inducted at their second meeting a painting of Solomon’s ruined Temple is presented to initiates in a neighbouring room, illustrating the ‘task in hand’. A master, two wardens, a secretary and speaker are all appointed as this newly formed cult’s officers which consists of all factions in Parliament, church and army. It proceeds to spy on MPs to assess their views on negotiation with or trial of Charles I in preparation for Pride’s purge three months later. So, did Cromwell ‘do a deal with the devil’? Exactly a decade later Cromwell is dead. Rumours survive about Cromwell ‘selling his soul to the devil’ at the 1651 battle of Worcester.
  • 20 November 1648 – Cromwell’s son-in-law Henry Ireton’s Remonstrance is presented to Parliament calling for the trial of Charles I for treason.
  • 2 December 1648 Charles I is held in Hurst Castle
  • On 1st December, the House of Commons resists Ireton’s calls to proceed to try the king, voting by 129 to 83, a majority of 46 votes, to accept the King’s terms for his restoration to power.
  • The following day the New Model Army occupies London and arrests 41 MPs who had most actively supported the king, hoping that this will send a clear message to the others, if just a few of those remaining who support the king change their mind no further action by the army will be necessary.
  • 6 December 1648 – The Rump Parliament is created with Pride’s Purge. Acting on orders from Cromwell’s son-in-law General Henry Ireton, and apparently unknown to army chief General Fairfax, Colonel Thomas Pride surrounds parliament with troops and ‘purges’ Parliament of a further 140 or so MPs who had voted for the negotiated settlement with Charles. This leaves only 71 out of the originally elected 489 MPs still sitting, the so-called ‘Rump Parliament’. Around two hundred of the Long Parliament’s original MPs are now in prison and around the same number in fear of the army, afraid to speak out. Ninety MPs, the majority of those who voted the previous day to negotiate with the king, are purged from parliament along with 45 who resisted arrest detained for several days. Those considered most dangerous to Cromwell’s cause. Sir William Waller, Sir John Clotworthy and Lionel Copley are imprisoned in the tower without charge for many years. Denzil Holles, Colonel Massey and Major-General Browne escape to the continent.
  • 4th January 1649 a motion is but before parliament proposing the king be tried for treason. Only 46 of the Rump’s 71 MPs turn up to vote and 26 vote in favour, a majority of six is enough. The following day the Lords vote overwhelmingly against the same motion, but the vote is set aside by the then government, Cromwell’s Council of State. General Henry Ireton’s demand that Charles be put on trial is now voted through. In public Oliver Cromwell said he had his doubts about the purges and at the end of December he tells the House of Commons “the providence of God hath cast this upon us”. Once the decision had been made Cromwell “threw himself into it with the vigour he always showed when his mind was made up, when God had spoken”.
  • 20 January 1649 – a court is convened in Westminster Hall and Charles I is charged with “waging war on Parliament.” It was claimed that he was responsible for “all the murders, burnings, damages and mischiefs to the nation” in the English Civil War. The jury included remaining members of Parliament, army officers and large landowners. Some of the 135 jurors did not turn up for the trial. For example. General Thomas Fairfax, the leader of the Parliamentary Army, did not appear. When his name was called, his masked wife, Lady Anne Fairfax, shouted out, “He has more wit than to be here,” and was whisked out of the public gallery before she could be arrested. After the court had been sworn in Charles demanded to know by what authority he had been brought to trial. President of the court John Bradshaw replied ‘In the name of Parliament assembled and all the good people of England’. Lady Fairfax who had quietly returned sprang up again ‘It is a lie! Not a half – nay, not a quarter of the people of England’ and she was once more spirited away.
  • 30 January 1649 – Outside the old Palace of Whitehall Charles I is executed. Immediately afterwards, to the consternation of the regicides, his memoir ‘Eikon Basiliske’ (Portrait of the King, his sacred majesty’s solitude and sufferings) is published. Sold amongst the silent crowds, and after more than twenty editions, it went on to become one of England’s all time bestsellers. England is now a military dictatorship run by Cromwell and his Council Of State’ appointees.
  • 1649-1660 – Elected by The Rump Parliament after the House of Lords has been abolished the Council of State assumes virtually sole executive powers during the interregnum.
  • Wednesday 28th March 1649 – Early morning arrest of Leveller pamphleteers John Lilburn, William Walwyn, Overton and Thomas Prince – Cromwell launches ‘project fear’ on the Council Of State ‘…if you do not break them they will break you, yea, and bring all the guilt of the blood and treasure shed and spent in this kingdom upon your heads and shoulders…’ – proposes all four prisoners are committed to the tower and wins by one vote.
  • 1 and 18 April – two separate 10,000 signature Petitions for Levellers’ release
  • 23 April 1649 – Women’s 10,000 signature petition to Parliament served, demanding release of the four Leveller captives and an end to arbitrary rule which is bringing famine to the land
  • 1 May 1649- The Agreement of the People published – Leveller manifesto
  • May 1649 – Wages unpaid and refusing to fight in Ireland, hundreds of parliamentary Leveller soldiers sack their officers at Burford, Oxfordshire. Cromwell arrests them in a midnight raid and next day three soldiers are executed for mutiny. Commemorated in Burford at the annual ‘Levellers Day’ with music, speeches, and a march from the parish church where soldiers and their horses were imprisoned.
  • 1650-1720 – the ‘golden age’ of piracy. The British secret state’s sponsorship of pirates is denied, just as Elizabeth denied she’d supported privateers Drake, Raleigh etc. The Royal Navy ‘state within a state’ works hard to fulfil John Dee’s vision for Britain’s dominance of the high seas as the empire is established
  • 3 September 1651- Battle of Worcester – final battle of the English Civil war with Charles II leading a Scottish army. Parliamentarian soldiers outnumber Royalists roughly 2:1 – Royalist casualties of c. 3,000 are roughly five times that of the Parliamentary army and 10,000 royalist soldiers are captured – a resounding defeat for Charles II
  • 3 September – Wednesday 15 October 1651 – Charles II goes ‘on the run’ for 43 days after losing the battle of Worcester and travelling as a fugitive, disguised as an ostler. After Captain Limbry’s abortive attempt to smuggle him to France from Charmouth in Dorset Charles eventually makes it across the channel from Shoreham, Sussex in Captain Tattersall’s coal freighter ‘The Surprise’.
  • 4th July to 12 December 1653 – ‘Barebones Parliament’ of 140 Cromwell appointees replaces the Rump Parliament who are ejected by Cromwell’s soldiers.
  • 16th December 1653 – 25 May 1659 –  ‘The Protectorate’. After Barebones is dissolved the ‘Instrument of Government’ creates the office of Lord Protector for Cromwell who chairs the Council Of State now as sole military rulers.
  • March 1655 – Uprising in Wiltshire against Cromwell’s military rule led by Colonel John Penruddock who led his followers into Salisbury and declared Charles II king. The rebellion was crushed, its leaders executed and English military rule suppressing all gatherings and pastimes was formalised into 11 districts each run by a major-general for the next two years.
  • December 14, 1655 – After much lobbying by founder of Holland’s first Hebrew printing press Menasseh Ben Israel, Jews are allowed back into England for the first time since they were expelled in 1290.
  • 25 may 1657 – Humble Petition and Advice offers Cromwell the title of King which he rejects.
  • 3 September 1658 – Cromwell dies aged 59.
  • 14 April – 29 December 1660 – Convention Parliament elected.
  • 1660 – Restoration of Charles II to the English throne after his exile in France and the death of Oliver Cromwell – known as a time of great literary and cultural freedom: comedies by Dryden, Wycherley, Ertheridge, Sedley, Buckhurst etc, after previous grim decade of puritan rule.
  • June-July 1685 – Exiled after the 1683 Rye House Plot, James Scott, 1st Duke of Monmouth launched the Protestant Monmouth Rebellion on 11th June 1685 landing with at Lyme Regis in a failed attempt to depose James II. On 6th July Battle of Sedgemoor near Bridgwater, Somerset, finishes off this rather insufficient attempt by Protestants to cut off the Catholic Stuart line.
  • 5th November 1688 – William of Orange lands at Torbay with 14,000 soldiers and 5,000 horses. Coup d’état or ‘Glorious Revolution’ follows as James II is forced into exile in Ireland, while Protestant, William III, ‘King Billy’ takes the English throne. This also begins the Catholic ‘Jacobite’ movement committed to restoring the Stuart line. Jacobite areas tend to be Scotland, Northern England and the South-West, the old royalist regions of the English Civil War.
  • 1707 – Great Britain comes into being after the passage of the Treaty of Union with Scotland.
  • 27 August 1715 –  Jacobite rising by the ‘Old Pretender’ James Edward Stuart, son of deposed King James II, to regain the crown of England, Scotland and Ireland. On 14th November his army surrendered at Preston and the rebellion was over.
  • 1737 – Andrew Ramsay reveals the 33 degrees of Scottish Rite Freemasonry, so named because no decree had ever been issued by Scottish Monarchs banning the Knights Templar.
  • 1745 – Bonnie Prince Charlie leads abortive Jacobite rebel march on London
  • 1951 – The Fraudulent Mediums Act makes witchcraft legal in Britain for the first time since 1542.

Conclusion

In his 1826 novel ‘Woodstock’ Sir Walter Scott recounts, ‘the bankrupt brewer of Huntingdon’, and other contemporary cavalier quips about Oliver Cromwell’s obscure pre-war life. The aggressive, failed manager mysteriously given a new role as an MP.

It should be clear by now that Charles was not simply dealing with an organised faction of merchants who wished to see the nation run more efficiently. No, behind these various plots was a conscious choice to sidestep Christianity, the moral code that had been keeping them in their place. As the joyless, pecuniary policies of the pseudo-Christian Puritans also implies. In taking on parliament and the City of London was Charles confronting John Dee’s well-organised criminal conspiracy? Dark forces at play with nothing less than the world as their prize?

Is it this stepping into the spiritual that makes so many historians baulk at addressing the wickedness of overthrowing the monarchy in the seventeenth century, to replace it with a system of glorious rule by Cromwell’s council of state? Where a secret cabal gets to hire and fire those on the panel and there is limited free speech. In 1649 Burford even parliamentary soldiers thought Cromwell might be worse than the king.

However wicked a king might be, and Henry VIII was one of the most despotic rulers since Herod, every once in a while the feudal system throws up a good sort. It did with Charles and there was nothing the oligarchy, organised crime, could do to unseat him except character assassination followed by kangaroo court and execution.

Reading list – in order of personal preference

Old Rowley, The Private Life Of Charles II by Dennis Wheatley (1933) – affectionate roller coaster ride through young Charles survival and resurgence after the war including easy to follow up detail on the cultural thrill of the restoration

The Levellers And The English Revolution by Henry H. Brailsford (1961) – takes us through the formation and attempted destruction of Cromwell’s key Leveller opponents, along with their offshoots. Though Brailsford is an internationalist he shows deep understanding for the spiritual and moral factions on both sides of the war

Edmund Ludlow And The English Civil War edited by Jane Shuter (1994) – fascinating account of a Parliamentary commander who finds himself slowly losing faith in the cause for which he has been fighting

Born In Blood, The Lost Secrets of Freemasonry by John J. Robinson (1989) – Extraordinary historical exploration of the previously hidden origins of eighteenth century Freemasonry in ancient and medieval secret societies.

The World Turned Upside Down by Christopher Hill (1972) – Detailed analysis of seventeenth century counter-culture centred around the protestant reformation and agricultural reforms being imposed on England and the cataclysmic Civil War which followed.

The Witch-Cult in Western Europe by Margaret Murray (1921) – A study of the underground persistence of secret Canaanite and Phoenician religious cults under the surface of gentile modern European society.

Who we are

The Land Is Ours was set up in 1995 by writer George Monbiot with the aim to echo in the UK land rights campaigns across the developing world, notably Brazil’s landless movement (MST). Also to take up the cause through non-violent direct action of forgotten Diggers, Chartists and Land Leaguers on our own islands. You can find us online at www.tlio.org.uk and join the Diggers list, set up in Easter 1999 when we occupied St George’s Hill,  Surrey for two weeks on the Diggers’ 350th anniversary, by sending a blank email to diggers350-subscribe@gn.apc.org

Land is a free gift to mankind so should never be considered private property like other things. ‘True Leveller’ Gerrard Winstanley said ‘The Earth is a Common Treasury for All, Without Respect of Persons’. Winstanley died a Quaker and the Bible puts it thus: The land is not to be sold permanently, for the Earth is mine, sayeth The Lord God, and you are but my tenants. Leviticus 25:25.

 

linked article

Dissolution of the Monasteries, Civil War, Thomas Cromwell, Oliver Cromwell and the founding of freemasonry and Zionism?

 

Tony’s new paperback and eBooks Traitors Of Arnhem, Siege Of Heaven; Siege Of Heaven Reader – all available for donation, or to buy, via www.bilderberg.org
BCfm’s weekly Politics Show presented by Tony Gosling with Irish Republican Labour activist Martin Summers was forced off FM, now online only. We were ‘rested due to the pandemic’ on 24 March 2020 by BCfm charity ‘CEO’ Patrick Hart who is a longtime personal friend of Bristol’s all-powerful right-wing ‘Labour’ mayor Marvin Rees. This Internet only NOT The BCfm Politics Show is now available 17:00-c. 21:00 live on Fridays. Pat Hart replaced us with an inane student show repeating MSM stories called The Bristol Agenda. If you’d like to share your views on his deliberate dumbing-down mismanagement you can contact UK broadcasting regulator Ofcom or BCfm board chair and the ‘Don’ here.

February 2019 Ofcom complaint result: UKLFI exposed as creation of Israeli foreign ministryBristol Post article: BCfm cleared after being reported to Ofcom for anti-semitic conspiracy theories

MP3 of Friday 24th June 2022 Show [right click to download]… …(from c. 23:00) – Links to this week’s full interviews, bottom of page
SHOW STARTS AT 17:00 = 5pm BST – FOR 3 HRS TO C. 20:00
17:00 to 20:00 BST, 12:00-15:00 EST, 09:00-12:00 PST. 08:00-11:00 NZ Time – Repeats 11 & 5 AM & PM BST daily on our Sputnik stream
Click here to Listen live online each week LIVE STREAM www.talkradio.org.uk Alternative live stream www.radioquk.com
OR Download The Show After Transmission HERE
TONY’S BOOKS: Bilderberg.org – TONY’S CHANNELS: Telegram (new) BitchuteLegacy Odysee911 ForumRadio4AllThe Land Is OursVKTwitSpaceNSAbook – YouTube: This Show, Peter BoreniusPublic Enquiry

Radio4All mp3 audio files usually available from 23:00 2-4hrs, after TX – we’ll credit you if you rebroadcast. Any probs. mp3s should be on alternative links below by then

Three parts to this week’s show – past, present and future….

Past Hour John Dee’s British empire, witchcraft and the English Civil War

Tony takes us through his 2022 Summer Solstice investigation: Enclosure For Empire, Witchcraft Freemasonry and Oliver Cromwell, subtitled ‘The ‘Bankrupt Brewer of Huntingdon’, and Solomon’s Temple: an untold story of the English Civil War’ and goes through a history timeline from extinguishing of the Knights Templar The War of the Roses through to the English Civil War, Restoration of the monarchy and King Billy’s coup, known as the Glorious Revolution. The just cause of the Jacobites. The influence of Freemasonry as being a form of Witchcraft, a hidden organisation behind the trial and execution of Charles I. The role of John Dee in Elizabethan times in setting our secret plans for the Royal Navy to ‘rule the waves’ and the necessity of land privatisation, or enclosure, to their plan.

follow link to the full timeline here

Witchcraft and the Order of the Garter ‘garter’ being a hidden embelem of a witchcraft high-priest or priestess, leader of a coven, or of covens of covens. As pointed out by Margaret Murray in her 1921 book ‘The Witch-Cult In Western Europe: ‘It is generally believed that there should be a fixed number of wizards and witches in each canton. The new initiate uses the old papers of the old one. Bad people form a brotherhood which is led by a witch.This one has the garter as a mark of her dignity. They transmit it successively by rank of seniority. There is only this difference in rank between sorcerers and witches. These are recruited just as much from sexually active people as from celibate people.’ (translated from French, The Witch-Cult in Western Europe by Margaret Murray p.191)

Bitchute video of complete show

Present Hour – Local national and international news review

Bristol Mayor Marvin Rees has banned Local Democracy Reporter, Alex Seabrook, from Council Meetings.  Alex questioning Marvin’s 9000 mile flight to a climate change conference – and Marvin  not taking kindly to it.  Jo Booth –.  Press Gazette –  BBC and ITV join regional press boycott as council defends LDR ban Bristol City Council has hit back at the Bristol Post after journalists employed under the BBC-funded scheme were banned from regular briefings held by Mayor of Bristol Marvin Rees. The spat comes after a public relations boss at the authority challenged Post LDR Alex Seabrooks right to ask a question of the mayor during a recent conference. The councils treatment of Alex and Adam has prompted the Post to boycott the mayoral conference, with rival titles Bristol 24/7 and Bristol World following suit. The BBC has itself now also joined the boycott, with a spokesperson saying: We are deeply disappointed by the decision by the mayors office to not allow the Bristol LDR into his fortnightly press conference. It is an essential ingredient of local democracy that journalists should be able to ask robust, challenging questions to people in power. We have today informed the mayor that the BBC wont be attending the fortnightly mayoral briefings until this important issue is resolved. We will continue to report on the city council and mayor as normal by attending all other meetings. Ian Axton, head of news at ITV West Country, added: ITV News West Country stands by other media organisations on this issue. We will not attend the fortnightly press briefings held by the mayor until the exclusion of local democracy reporters is lifted. As the row rumbled on, the council claimed the Post breached a long-standing agreement that it would not send either Alex or his LDR colleague Adam Postans to cover the Labour mayors remotely-held conferences, while the newspaper said it has always reserved the right to have LDRs cover the briefings. The authority has accepted neither Alex nor Adam have been turned away when they have previously dialled in to attend, but declined to comment on any future arrangements surrounding the conferences when quizzed on the matter by HTFP. A spokesman for the authority told HTFP: Any suggestion that LDR attendance has been barred as a result of recent reporting is completely false, and we continue to work day-to-day with LDRs in support of their role. All mainstream local media outlets are invited to the mayors media briefings. There has been a long-standing mutual agreement between the mayors office and the Post about personnel attending press conferences whenever they are announced and held, and that LDRs would not be sent due to the narrow definition of their role as an impartial service. In response, Post editor Pete Gavan told HTFP: Its great to get this support from colleagues and rivals across the city and beyond. Its vital LDRs have access to these briefings as coverage of the mayor falls well within their remit. In the past, we had agreed to send other reporters to the mayoral briefings when possible but reserved the right to send the LDRs. We do not accept that any reporters should be banned from attending meetings at the behest of the council, nor from asking relevant questions on behalf of our readers and council taxpayers at any time. Alex, pictured, was challenged at a recent briefing by the councils head of external comms Saskia Konynenburg after he questioned Mr Rees over his decision to fly 9,000 miles to Canada and back to give a talk on climate change. Ms Konyenburg had described Alexs question as something a journalist from a newspaper, rather than an LDR, should ask. The authority later defended her claim in a statement to HTFP on the incident, while industry colleagues rallied in support of Alex after footage of the row was widely shared on Twitter. The councils actions have also been criticised by the National Union of Journalists and the News Media Association. Charlotte Green, Reach LDR chapel rep, said: The Reach LDR NUJ chapel strongly condemns the position adopted towards local democracy reporters in Bristol by the city council. Holding authorities to account and scrutinising their actions and decisions including asking difficult questions that leaders might not like is at the heart of the purpose of the scheme. Reactionary measures, like banning LDRs from mayoral media briefings, only serves to undermine a councils public commitment to transparency and accountability to its residents. We stand firmly in support of our colleagues in Bristol to report without fear or favour, and they should not face retribution for asking questions in the public interest. NMA deputy chief executive Lynne Anderson added: The NMA condemns the banning of local democracy reporters from the Bristol mayors briefings a blunt assault on the principles of local democracy in the strongest possible terms. By preventing local journalists from scrutinising their activity, Bristol City Council are disenfranchising the public they are supposed to serve. We stand with our colleagues in calling for an immediate end to this wholly misguided and deeply damaging ban.  

Bristol mayor Marvin Rees’ TED TALK management gobbledegook climate speech in Vancouver. 

https://twitter.com/mrdissent/status/1539849348179263490

RMT rail strike – Grant Shapps and Department for Transport are deliberately prolonging the strike by interfering in negotiations with the object of breaking the RMT union – Andrew Haynes, Chief Executive of Network Rail, giving his take.  Mick Lynch, RMT General Secretary, explaining why they’re striking, on ITV Peston show.  Anushka on Peston show gives Labour’s position on strike, and Mick Lynch responds.  Grant Shapps, Transport Secretary, gives his take on strike.  Andrew Haynes again.  Mick Lynch on BBC QT on rail money going to private equity firmsPoll shows nearly 3 quarters of public want rail workers to have cost of living wage rise Independent polling released by the RMT today found strong support for rail workers to receive a fairer deal and for the government to intervene to address the rail workers concerns. A clear majority of the public also support the rail workers’ right to strike when negotiations fail. In a blow to the rail companies and the government, the poll also revealed widespread opposition to plans to cut thousands of rail jobs and showed the public also clearly opposed to government policy of allowing profiteering from the rail industry. The national poll of 2000 people carried out by Opinium found: Only 17% support cuts to staff on trains and stations and only 16% support the cutting of safety critical workers from inspecting and maintaining the rail tracks. Opposition to both of these measures is high at 63% and 70% respectively. 70% of the public believe that rail workers should have a negotiated pay rise that takes into account the cost of living, whilst just 11% disagree. 59% believe rail workers have the right to strike if negotiations fail and only 18% are against this. 62% believe that the government should intervene to ensure rail companies meet the rail workers’ concerns. Only 14% are against this 84% of the public believe the profits from the rail industry should be invested in protecting jobs and services, as opposed to the 16% who believe they should go towards shareholder dividends.

Chris Williamson, former Labour MP, on how a Government can run a deficit without a problem.  Book – ‘The Deficit Myth’ by Stephanie Keller.  Book – ‘Reclaiming the State’ by Bill Mitchell.  The Deficit Myth: Modern Monetary Theory and the Birth of the People’s Economy by Stephanie Kelton The leading thinker and most visible public advocate of modern monetary theory — the freshest and most important idea about economics in decades — delivers a radically different, bold, new understanding for how to build a just and prosperous society. Stephanie Kelton’s brilliant exploration of modern monetary theory (MMT) dramatically changes our understanding of how we can best deal with crucial issues ranging from poverty and inequality to creating jobs, expanding health care coverage, climate change, and building resilient infrastructure. Any ambitious proposal, however, inevitably runs into the buzz saw of how to find the money to pay for it, rooted in myths about deficits that are hobbling us as a country. Reclaiming the State: A Progressive Vision of Sovereignty for a Post-Neoliberal World by William F. Mitchell, Trump. Brexit. The alt-right. It’s increasingly apparent that old political notions­believed to be consigned to the dustbin of history­are now resurrected. The neonationalist, anti-globalization, and anti-establishment attitude engulfing the United States and United Kingdom hints suspiciously at a yearning for national sovereignty. Reclaiming the State offers an urgent and prescient political analysis and economic program for the Left who are strategizing for these uncertain times. Many of our assumptions­about ideology, democracy, trade, and globalization­are being thrown into doubt, deposed by populism, nationalism, and racism. In response to these challenging times, economist Bill Mitchell and political theorist Thomas Fazi propose a reconceptualization of the sovereign state as a vehicle for change. They offer a progressive view of sovereignty based not on the demonization of the other, but as a way to bring the economy back under democratic control. With nationalism gaining support across the United States with each passing week, Reclaiaming the State provides innovative ideas to mobilize and reenergize a tired, divided Left. 

Ukraine – General Sanders tells Russia to prepare for war.  ‘Reminiscence of a Future’  blog.  General Lord Dannat discusses General Sanders’ claim.  C4 News report – supplies for Kaliningrad threatened by EU sanctions on Russia. Russia Demands Lithuania Lift “Openly Hostile” Blockade of Kalingrad; Panic Buying Ensues The Russian Foreign Ministry has responded to Lithuania’s partial blockade of Kaliningrad, writing in a statement that they consider the “provocative measures” to be “openly hostile” and warning that the Kremlin may take action to “protect its national interests.Kaliningrad is sandwiched between the EU and NATO members Poland and Lithuania. Supplies from Russia are delivered via rail and gas pipelines through Lithuania – which announced last week that it was banning the rail transit of goods subject to EU sanctions, which include coal, advanced technology, metals and construction materials.“If in the near future cargo transit between the Kaliningrad region and the rest of the territory of the Russian Federation through Lithuania is not restored in full, then Russia reserves the right to take actions to protect its national interests,” the statement reads. They have demanded that Lithuania immediately lift the ban on a number of goods to the Kaliningrad region. Earlier Monday, the Kremlin called Lithuania’s announcement “unprecedented” and “in violation of everything there is.” “The situation is more than serious and it requires a very deep analysis before formulating any measures and decisions,” said Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov in a statement to the press. Lithuanian Foreign Minister Gabrielius Landsbergis said they were simply complying with sanctions imposed by the EU, and that they were taken after “consultation with the European Commission and under its guidelines.” “Sanctioned goods (will) no longer be allowed to transit Lithuanian territory,” he added. Kaliningrad governor Anton Alikhanov says that the ban, which was confirmed on Friday, affects roughly 50% of all imports. He urged citizens not to panic-buy… …to no avail. Quite possibly the biggest Russia-West provocation of the entire four-month long war in Ukraine has occurred this weekend, but few in the media establishment seem to be taking notice of the singular event which has the potential to quickly spiral toward a WW3 scenario. Baltic EU/NATO member Lithuania has implemented a ban on all rail transit goods going to Russia’s far-western exclave of Kaliningrad, after transport authorities initially announced the provocative measure on Friday. “The EU sanctions list notably includes coal, metals, construction materials and advanced technology, and Alikhanov said the ban would cover around 50% of the items that Kaliningrad imports,” Reuters wrote.

St. Petersburg International Economic Forum (SPIEF) – Russia’s alternative to Davos – Putin’s opening speech. St. Petersburg 2022 Forum Sets the Stage for the “War of Economic Corridors” In St. Petersburg, the world’s new powers gather to upend the US-concocted “rules-based order” and reconnect the globe their way By Pepe Escobar TheCradle.co 18 June 2022 The St. Petersburg International Economic Forum has been configured for years now as absolutely essential to understand the evolving dynamics and the trials and tribulations of Eurasia integration. St. Petersburg in 2022 is even more crucial as it directly connects to three simultaneous developments I had previously outlined, in no particular order: First, the coming of the “new G8” – four BRICS nations (Brazil, Russia, India, China), plus Iran, Indonesia, Turkey and Mexico, whose GDP per purchasing parity power (PPP) already dwarfs the old, western-dominated G8. Second, the Chinese “Three Rings” strategy of developing geoeconomic relations with its neighbors and partners. Third, the development of BRICS+, or extended BRICS, including some members of the “new G8,” to be discussed at the upcoming summit in China. There was hardly any doubt President Putin would be the star of St. Petersburg 2022, delivering a sharp, detailed speech to the plenary session. Among the highlights, Putin smashed the illusions of the so-called ‘golden billion’ who live in the industrialized west (only 12 percent of the global population) and the “irresponsible macroeconomic policies of the G7 countries.” The Russian president noted how “EU losses due to sanctions against Russia” could exceed $400 billion per year, and that Europe’s high energy prices – something that actually started “in the third quarter of last year” – are due to “blindly believing in renewable sources.” He also duly dismissed the west’s ‘Putin price hike’ propaganda, saying the food and energy crisis is linked to misguided western economic policies, i.e., “Russian grain and fertilizers are being sanctioned” to the detriment of the west. In a nutshell: the west misjudged Russia’s sovereignty when sanctioning it, and now is paying a very heavy price. Chinese President Xi Jinping, addressing the forum by video, sent a message to the whole Global South. He evoked “true multilateralism,” insisting that emerging markets must have “a say in global economic management,” and called for “improved North-South and South-South dialogue.” It was up to Kazakh President Tokayev, the ruler of a deeply strategic partner of both Russia and China, to deliver the punch line in person: Eurasia integration should progress hand in hand with China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI). Here it is, full circle.

Future hour – end-times prophecies in the news

Martyn Whittock, Christian, Catholic historian and author of ‘The End of Times, Again?’ discusses eschatology and peoples different interpretations of the End Times and scripture in the Bible. Also how quite commonly this can be used to bad purpose to justify dangerous aggressive actions and the dividing of societies in to good and bad. Mike Leigh’s 1993 film ‘Naked’ – Johnny, played by David Thewlis who won best actor at Cannes for the performance, interprets The Mark Of The Beast and other parts of the Holy Book of Revelation.  Follow Martyn on Twitter – @MartynHistorianFrom the Middle Eastern politics of Donald Trump to the UK’s 2016 EU Referendum, large numbers of Christians are making decisions based on the alleged “end-times” aspects of modern politics. Such apocalyptic views often operate beneath “the radar” of much Christian thought and expression. In this book, historian Martyn Whittock argues that while the New Testament does indeed teach the second coming of Christ, complications occur when Christians seek to confidently identify contemporary events as fulfilments of prophecy. Such believers are usually unaware that they stand in a long line of such well-intended but failed predictions. In this book, Whittock explores the history of end-times speculations over two thousand years, revealing how these often reflect the ideologies and outlooks of contemporary society in their application of Scripture. When Christians ignore such past mistakes, they are in danger of repeating them. Jesus, Whittock argues, taught a different way.

The Accelerationists – a dangerous modern atheist philosophical movement trying to hasten the end of the world to prove that those of faith are, in fact, cowards who refuse to face mortality and other of life’s difficult questions. and to ‘prove’ there is no God who will save anybody. The object of accelerationism appears to be to destroy the monotheistic faiths once-and-for-all, rather like Albert Pike said he wanted to do in his notorious 15th August 1871 letter to Guissepe Mazzini.By the early 90s Land had distilled his reading, which included Deleuze and Guattari and Lyotard, into a set of ideas and a writing style that, to his students at least, were visionary and thrillingly dangerous. Land wrote in 1992 that capitalism had never been properly unleashed, but instead had always been held back by politics, “the last great sentimental indulgence of mankind”. He dismissed Europe as a sclerotic, increasingly marginal place, “the racial trash-can of Asia”. And he saw civilisation everywhere accelerating towards an apocalypse: “Disorder must increase… Any [human] organisation is … a mere … detour in the inexorable death-flow.” Land gave strange, theatrical lectures: clambering over chairs as he spoke, or sitting hunched over, rocking back and forth. He also spiced his pronouncements with black humour. He would tell lecture audiences, “I work in the field of The Collapse of Western Civilisation Studies.” A quarter of a century on, some former Warwick philosophy students still talk about him with awe. Robin Mackay says, “I think he’s one of the most important philosophers of the last 50 years.”

Might the British royal family produce the Biblical antichrist? Can Prince Charles become head of the Church of England? He has been altering the constitution by speaking out politically unlike his more gracious mother QUeen Elizabeth II. Prince Charles likening Putin to Hitler in 2014. ‘Unacceptable, outrageous and low’: Furious Kremlin demands official explanation for Prince Charles comparing Putin to Hitler and says words are ‘not worthy of a future British king’ Prince Charles likened President Putin to Adolf Hitler during Canada tour Kremlin condemned words as ‘deeply insulting’, called for urgent talks British diplomats make no reference to prince’s remarks during talks with Moscow’s London deputy ambassador – and instead focus on Ukraine unrest Pro-Putin media is now linking the Royal Family to Nazis in retaliation Putin and Charles are both due to attend a war memorial in Colville in June Charles left flew out of Winnipeg today at the end of his three-day tour Pro-Russian militants storm checkpoint and kill 14 Ukrainian soldiers Russia today vented its fury at Prince Charles over his comments likening Vladimir Putin to Adolf Hitler. Using Cold War-style rhetoric delivered as the royal was flying back to Britain, a Foreign Ministry spokesman said Charles’s remarks – revealed by the Daily Mail – were ‘unacceptable, outrageous and low’. ‘If these words were really said, then undoubtedly they are not worthy of a future British monarch,’ foreign ministry spokesman Alexander Lukashevich said in Moscow. “We have requested an official explanation from British authorities over the statements. ‘We view the use of the Western press by members of the British royal family to spread the propaganda campaign against Russia on a pressing issue – that is, the situation in Ukraine – as unacceptable, outrageous and low.’ It is the first official comment made by Russian authorities and comes as Russia’s deputy ambassador to London held face-to-face talks at the Foreign Office today. Prince Charles’s office has made no claim that he did not make the comparison but has said it was a ‘private’ conversation. In London, the Russian embassy added to the attack. ‘The minister-counsellor of the embassy, Mr Alexander Kramarenko, will meet this afternoon the representatives of the FCO [Foreign and Commonwealth Office] to discuss a range of bilateral issues,’ it said in a statement. ‘The outrageous remarks made by Prince Charles in Canada will be among the questions raised. The embassy asked the FCO for official clarifications on that yesterday.’

Megan Fox as an example of satanic ideas of today’s celebrities – drinking each others blood.  Megan Denise Fox is an American actress and model. She has made multiple appearances in major film franchises, including the Transformers franchise Megan Fox would like to clear up what people think about her and fiancé Machine Gun Kelly drinking each other’s blood. “So, I guess to drink each other’s blood might mislead people or people are imagining us with goblets and we’re like ‘Game of Thrones,’ drinking each other’s blood,” she told Glamour UK. “It’s just a few drops, but yes, we do consume each other’s blood on occasion for ritual purposes only.” Fox is on the cover of the April issue of the magazine and said she’s into astrology, metaphysical practices, meditations, as well as new and full moon practices. When she and Kelly do a blood ritual, she said, for her “it’s a passage or it is used for a reason.” “And it is controlled where it’s like, ‘Let’s shed a few drops of blood and each drink it,'” Fox said. “He’s much more haphazard and hectic and chaotic, where he’s willing to just cut his chest open with broken glass and be like, ‘Take my soul.'” The pair are friends with another engaged couple, Kourtney Kardashian and Travis Barker, but Fox said they don’t hang out as much as people may believe.

GB News – Nicola Sturgeon pardons Witches from the past. But is she herself a witch? Why only mention female witches when around half executed were men? And how can she overturn any jury trial verdict from 400 years ago? What new evidence does European Council on Foreign Relations political plant Nicola Sturgeon have other than to say – they were all innocent? Nicola Sturgeon says sorry to WITCHES: First Minister issues formal apology to women who ‘suffered injustice driven by misogyny’ when they were burned at the stake 400 years ago Nicola Sturgeon marked International Women’s Day by issuing historic apology She said sorry to the 4,000 accused of being witches between 1563 and 1736 Half of those were executed and more than 85% convicted were female – Miss Sturgeon said injustice was ‘driven by misogyny’ and needs recognition despite around one in six witches executed being men 09 March 2022 | Nicola Sturgeon has issued a formal apology to thousands of women who suffered ‘injustice on a colossal scale’ when they were accused of being witches several centuries ago. The First Minister yesterday marked International Women’s Day by issuing the historical apology for those who were accused, convicted, vilified or executed under the Scottish Witchcraft Act of 1563. An estimated 4,000 Scots were accused of being witches between 1563 and 1736. But Miss Sturgeon said the injustice they suffered was ‘driven by misogyny’ and needs to be recognised. She also praised Baroness Helena Kennedy’s ‘powerful and compelling’ report on misogyny, and welcomed its recommendations, which include the introduction of a statutory aggravation of misogyny. A petition looking to grant a pardon for the 4,000 people accused of witchcraft has been introduced in the Scottish parliament by campaigners.

Tim Cohen, author of ‘Prince Charles and a Cup of Tea’, thinks Prince Charles is the Antichrist.  In The AntiChrist and a Cup of Tea, Tim Cohen provides biblical evidence to demonstrate that all of the prophecies pertaining to the coming AntiChrist – that can be fulfilled before he assumes control over a global government during the Great Tribulation – are already fulfilled in a living prince of Roman lineage; this is true of no one else. This prince, for example, has the lineage: he claims descent simultaneously from Israel’s King David, Islam’s false prophet Mohammed, and, by a false occult lineage, Jesus Christ Himself! This prince has the imagery: his personal heraldic achievement or coat of arms has the symbolism of the first beast of Revelation 13, representing the AntiChrist, and of Daniel 7 (i.e., the little horn having eyes like those of a man – a unicorn with human eyes). This prince’s coat of arms also bears the red dragon described in Revelation 12 and 13, specifically representing Satan, and he was seen globally as he faced this dragon in 1969 to be coronated as “Prince of the Red Dragon” (i.e., Satan). This prince has the name calculation: his title, by which he is globally known, calculates to 666 in both Hebrew and English on the original biblical numbering system – the very system used in the underlying Greek text of Revelation 13:18 to specify six-hundred and sixty-six. This prince has the involvement in the Mideast peace process. In fact, the current Road Map, as well as the Oslo process from which it derives, and the Madrid Peace talks from which the Oslo process itself derived, are directly traceable to the London Agreement of 1987, which in turn is traceable to…THIS PRINCE. Also, this prince has the global authority…. That’s right – he is not the ignored wimp that the masses have been misled to believe; rather, he is mankind’s number one globalist, and has been for decades. Indeed, this prince is over the entire New World Order power structure-through the world’s most prominent and oldest order of chivalry: the Order of the Garter. This order is very much more than merely a revival of King Arthur’s legendary round table. And to top it all off, this prince HAS THE IMAGERY OF WHAT IS TO BE THE FUTURE ABOMINATION THAT CAUSES DESOLATION! What is that? In March 2002, while trekking through Brazilian rain forests, this prince was presented with a miniature version of a statue depicting himself as an angelic figure with large wings standing atop a mass of human bodies looking up to him (this prince) as savior! In fact, the inscription on the statue’s base reads “Saviour of the World”!!! And it has this prince’s face…with wings! So what did this prince say when Brazilian officials asked his permission to create a ten cubits high (12 or 15 feet) version of this statue, and to place it in a square named after him in their capital city? Instead of calling it blasphemy to identify him as “Saviour of the World”, this prince remarked, “I am touched and deeply amazed,” and then, with the small ego he has, this prince gladly gave permission to create the larger version! Now, bear in mind that the arrival of this statue was years after the 1998 publication of the first edition of The AntiChrist and a Cup of Tea (ISBN 0-9662793-0-1), and there is no other man or woman who is being called “Saviour of the World” other than this prince whom Tim Cohen decades ago identified as the foretold AntiChrist – according to a true understanding of the prophetic scriptures. Coincidence? No. Just consider this: What would happen if even the miniature version of this princely idol, which has already been received by this prince and photographed by global media, were one day placed in a newly constructed holy place in Jerusalem? And what about the ten cubits high version? Would not all of evangelical Christianity suddenly scratch its collective head and wonder, “Gee, could this prince be the AntiChrist?” Well, you don’t have to wait for that day to find out, nor do you have to be entirely unprepared: Get The AntiChrist and a Cup of Tea and read it carefully. 

Radio4All download pages
COMPLETE SHOW AND FULL INTERVIEWS
[right click to download]
1 – Complete 3hr show – [right click to download]
Full interviews with…
2 –

 

Tony’s new paperback and eBooks Traitors Of Arnhem, Siege Of Heaven; Siege Of Heaven Reader – all available for donation, or to buy, via www.bilderberg.org
BCfm’s weekly Politics Show presented by Tony Gosling with Irish Republican Labour activist Martin Summers was forced off FM, now online only. We were ‘rested due to the pandemic’ on 24 March 2020 by BCfm charity ‘CEO’ Patrick Hart who is a longtime personal friend of Bristol’s all-powerful right-wing ‘Labour’ mayor Marvin Rees. This Internet only NOT The BCfm Politics Show is now available 17:00-c. 21:00 live on Fridays. Pat Hart replaced us with an inane student show repeating MSM stories called The Bristol Agenda. If you’d like to share your views on his deliberate dumbing-down mismanagement you can contact UK broadcasting regulator Ofcom or BCfm board chair and the ‘Don’ here.

February 2019 Ofcom complaint result: UKLFI exposed as creation of Israeli foreign ministryBristol Post article: BCfm cleared after being reported to Ofcom for anti-semitic conspiracy theories