British Army Training IDF Officers for Genocide at RCDS nr Buckingham Palace – Mossad Blackmailing Trump? As Netanyahu moves to cancel Supreme Court Ex-Israel Intelligence Dish Dirt – NOT The BCfm Politics Show presented by Tony Gosling
MP3 of Friday 8th August 2025 show [right click to download]
(from c. 11pm) This week’s full interview mp3s, bottom of page. SHOW STARTS 17:00 London time FOR c. 3½ HRS TO c. 20:30 – OUR LIVE STREAM to Listen live online. Alt. live streams RadioQUK.com, DJ Plug Radio OR Download Show After Transmission HERE. Repeats 11 & 5 AM & PM daily on our stream
Download NOT THE BCFM POLITICS SHOW APP [ANDROID APP (1)] Alternatives [GITHUB (2)] and [APKPURE (3)] – or the [Apple App store] – PS. You can replace evil Google Play, which banned us, with [the Aurora store]
Only 31% trust the UK Press! – UK media oligopoly TONY’S BOOKS: Bilderberg.org – 2 PAPER–BACKS – TONY’S CHANNELS: Telegram – Bitchute – 911 forum – Radio4All – The Land Is Ours – VK – Twitter/X – Farcebook – Brighteon – Rumble – RT Live on Rumble – Goebbelsesque YouTube: This show; Public Enquiry; Peter Borenius; i-Contact & Occult Geopolitics
Radio4All mp3 audio files usually available from 23:00 2-4hrs, after TX – we’ll credit you if you rebroadcast. Any probs. mp3s should be on alternative links below by then
Part One – Local and National News Review
New policy to build on allotments. Letter of Jeremy Corbyn The loss of allotments makes us all poorer By Jeremy Corbyn News that Angela Rayner may approve allotment sales will fill many with deep dismay. Allotments have always been under threat from developers. Now, that threat seems to have government backing, which makes the future of these precious spaces even more perilous. Those advising government and local authorities should have some regard for the troubled history of land ownership, and the struggle over access by those who simply want to grow their own crops. The debate goes back to the English Civil War, when the King wanted to secure control of the land he had gained, while Cromwell claimed to speak for the farmers. In truth, it was the Diggers who were the real revolutionaries. They wanted land to be in common ownership. Despite the restoration of the monarchy, huge areas of land were known as the Commons and survived for almost another two centuries. That is, until the greed of big landowners won out once again. The Enclosure Acts, one of the most grotesque abuses of power by Parliament, took away the growing and grazing rights of the rural poor. A monstrous attack on working-class life, the enclosures represented the widespread theft of public land, sanctioned by a parliament that was dominated by landowners. The rural poor, left with nothing and facing starvation, were forced to migrate to industrial cities. It was in these rapidly growing industrial cities – notably in Birmingham – that allotments started to grow. Allotments, then, grew out of opposition to enclosures and the privatisation of common land. Allotments were regulated in the late 19th and 20th century and, even though numbers have since fallen, there are about 330,000 allotment plots. At least 100,000 people are on waiting lists. ‘Once lost, they never return’ Allotments have been crucial in times of national stress. Many came out of the Second World War. Indeed, many that were established in the First World War, such as the one I enjoy in north London, have survived to this day. Once lost, they never return. Their loss makes us all poorer, as we become more and more detached from how food is grown and how nature interacts with us. Allotments provide a vital space for community cohesion, biodiversity and social solidarity. These parcels of land, that cannot be individually fenced, provide growing space for many people. Many people have no access to their own garden, and an allotment gives them the opportunity to grow vegetables and fruit and observe nature. Allotments are particularly important for people who experience stress and mental health problems. I speak to many people who would love access to them for this very reason. Property developers have always had their eyes on these parcels of land. Together with local authorities, they construct various arguments for building over them. Instead of contemplating sales of these wonderful spaces, the Government should be encouraging the growth of allotments, or where there is insufficient land, the growth of community and school gardens. In my own borough of Islington, community gardens have played a vital role in bringing the community together and encouraging sustainable food production. Of course, social housing is desperately needed, but we need not sacrifice these vital green spaces to build it. We can build on ex-industrial land and take over empty properties. Even then, we should ensure social housing is accompanied by community gardens and adequate growing space. Is this Government going to put the nail in the coffin of the joy of digging ground for potatoes on a cold, wet February Sunday afternoon? The battle for the grass roots is on! Jeremy Corbyn is the independent MP for Islington North
Rachel Reeves recession train crash so may have to raise tax. Economy problems. Rushanara Ali, Housing Minister, resigns after evicting tenants then raising rent on house by £700.00/month . Homelessness minister resigns after ‘forcing out tenants from east London townhouse and raising rent by £700’ Rushanara Ali reportedly increased living costs on the four-bedroom property near the Olympic Village to £4,000 a month Labour’s homelessness minister has resigned from government after it was revealed she evicted four tenants from an east London townhouse — before hiking the rent by hundreds of pounds per month. Rushanara Ali, 50, is said to have increased living costs on the four-bedroom property from £3,300 to £4,000, after telling the previous tenants their lease would not be renewed. In a letter to Sir Keir Starmer, she insisted she had “at all times” followed “all legal requirements” and taken her responsibilities “seriously” but quit as to not be a “distraction”. In response, the Prime Minister thanked Ms Ali for her “diligent work” at the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government. The occupants at the home, just a short distance from the Olympic Park, were reportedly handed a four months eviction notice last November. Weeks after they had left the property, it had been re-listed with the rent £700 a month higher than before, the i reports. A source close to the Labour MP for Bethnal Green and Stepney told the i the occupants were told their fixed-term tenancy would not be renewed and offered a rolling contract while the house was on the market, but chose to leave. The property returned to the renters’ market for £700 more a month than the previous rent when a buyer could not be found. Ms Ali has previously criticised “private renters being exploited”. She has also said the Labour government would “empower people to challenge unreasonable rent increases”. The government’s upcoming Renters’ Rights Bill will prevent landlords who have ended a tenancy to sell a property from then re-listing it with higher rent until six months or more after its occupants have left. The property is listed for sale at just under £900,000 and has access to a shared gym and swimming pool. UK London 2012 Stratford Olympic Park Stadium wild English countryside flowers flower bridge over City Mill River people crowd A former tenant of the east London property, Laura Jackson, told the i paper: “It’s an absolute joke. Trying to get that much money from renters is extortion”. The occupants were also told by letting agencies that they would be charged £2,400 for the home to be repainted and professionally cleaned. Landlords are prevented from charging tenants for professional cleaning under the Tenant Fees Act 2019. It is understood the charges were dropped after Ms Ali was told of them. Shadow housing secretary James Cleverley said the allegations “would be an example of the most extreme hypocrisy and she should not have the job as homelessness minister”. A spokesperson for Ms Ali said: “Rushanara takes her responsibilities seriously and complied with all relevant legal requirements.”
Anita Bennett – against Baltic Wharf development. Guy Poultney not happy. Inflation. Blackrock owns most of shares. Thatcher – changes to taxes. Did you know that Goram Homes/Council lied on their application (to themselves) to build high-rises on the Harbourside’s Baltic Wharf? The Environment Agency has placed much of the Harbourside into the highest flood risk zone, with a “significant and unacceptable risk to life” for residents and users. Further, the Bristol City Council recently passed a cross-party motion to protect all green spaces from destructive development. They claim to be getting £2m from a central Brownfields Fund when a Council debate showed that Baltic Wharf is far from a brownfield site. We got 3000 signatures for a petition demanding they use only the official NPPR definition of brownfield. There is no history of any buildings here. It was a lumber yard for shipbuilding. Marvin forced it through during the elections because he knew the Greens would cave in, not wanting to be seen as nimbys against housebuilding. It’s not too late to challenge this illegality now, with a Green-led council. Baltic Wharf is the Trojan Horse which opens the floodgates to the destruction of our historic Harbourside. Private Eye has just begun to expose the scandal that saw the Environment Agency and Bristol City Council flood manager suddenly reverse their longstanding opposition to high rise flats on Baltic Wharf. Isabel and I stayed under the lively trees here last night, enjoying night views of our favourite Nova Scotia pub, the lights over the water. We are campaigning to turn this into a public park, with a a special disabled adults playground on part of it. Let’s hope the Green Cllrs actually live up to the party’s heritage now they have the power. We aren’t holding our breath and are organising the Tree Brides 3rd anniversary
LBC Radio – lady ranting about how it wasn’t easier in the 1970s. Housing. Housing in China. Elon Musk gets 30 million dollars from shares from Tesla. Electric cars. Trump and Musk fell out. Is it possible to stop privatisation? Tesla board awards $29bn of shares to Elon Musk The award is worth about $29bn based on Friday’s closing share price. Musk is worth $350bn, according to the Bloomberg billionaires index. Over the past year, Musk has become embroiled in US politics and a political relationship with Donald Trump that turned toxic after the president entered the White House for the second time, a feat assisted by the Tesla chief executive’s financial and personal support. The furore put off left-leaning Tesla buyers inside and outside the US, though competition in the electric car market has also affected sales. A survey from the research firm S&P Global Mobility shared with Reuters showed that Tesla’s customer loyalty has plunged since Musk endorsed Trump. It found 49.9% of Tesla-owning households in the market for a new car bought another Tesla last March. This was just below the industry average, but was down from 73% in June 2024. It edged back up to 57.4% in May this year. Chief executive will pay $2bn to buy stock in the carmaker at 2018 price after court rules against pay deal Tesla’s board has approved the award of $29bn (£22bn) worth of shares to its chief executive, Elon Musk, after a US court ruled against a previous pay deal for the world’s richest person. Musk will pay $2bn to buy 96m shares in the electric carmaker at the same price per share as a 10-year pay package agreed in 2018, which is stuck in legal limbo awaiting a court date for an appeal. The award was based on a recommendation from a “special committee” of the board. The announcement in a financial filing was accompanied by a shareholder letter from two members of the committee, Robyn Denholm, Tesla’s chair, and Kathleen Wilson-Thompson. It described the award as a “good faith” payment to Musk after the previous pay deal, worth $56bn, was rescinded in 2024 by a judge in Delaware, where the company was incorporated until June that year.
Online Safety Bill – we need a better press. Ali Mc Forever – who’s writing these laws – Carnegie – Robber Barons. Regulatory capture. Philanthropists or oligarchs. The new book-banning. Even if the act’s proponents were interested in protecting children, this would not be the way to do it. The underlying logic of the Online Safety Act is that shielding young people from unsavoury, objectionable or difficult content – rather than teaching them how to engage with it critically – is a necessary act of protection. This rhetoric joins the ranks of book-banning and abstinence-based sex education by infringing on young people’s right to information, privacy, and expression – rights enshrined in the 1989 UN convention on the rights of the child, which the UK has signed. Today’s moral panic around social media and youth owes much to Jonathan Haidt’s The Anxious Generation, which claims that smartphones and social media have “rewired” children’s brains and exacerbated their mental health. As has been widely pointed out, Haidt is not an expert on child development or online harms, and the scientific community has thoroughly refuted his book for its sensationalism and reactionary undertones. Yet Haidt’s pop psychology book continues to be referenced by Ofcom. How then to address the various crises – mental health, for one – that our young people are suffering, and which social media appears to contribute to? Well, ask them: in 2024, Crisis Textline, a mental health hotline that provides free, confidential support text in English or Spanish to young people globally, asked its adolescent users what they need to cope with crises. The number one response? More opportunities for social connection, which age verification does nothing but restrict. The real and perhaps only winners of the Online Safety Act are not children, but tech companies. Take the age verification vendors. As content moderation scholar Eric Goldman writes, platform companies will outsource age verification to specialised vendors in an effort to comply with the act. This means that a small number of age verification vendors will have access to users’ personal data, which they can monetise into consumer profiles. These vendors also stand to gain lucrative contracts with big platform companies and government agencies as the market for digital identity verification expands. Unsurprisingly, the Age Verification Providers Association has been a key driver of the act. Meanwhile, the tech industry will continue expanding its extraction of our personal data, feeding its surveillance business model that, for example, creates targeted advertising that coerces kids into sports gambling or mines their facial data to train models. An online safety regulation that actually centred young people’s wellbeing would go after the tech industry’s predatory business model for starters. Ofcom has set a dangerous precedent. There is a wave of child online safety legislation around the world that will be emboldened by the UK’s move. Australia led this wave last year by passing the social media minimum age restriction, which will go into effect this December. In the US, the Kids Online Safety Act was passed in the Senate but voted down by the House last year, though several states have already passed age verification laws, with more set to join. The Malaysian government passed its Online Safety Act in 2024. Canada’s is currently under review. There is a glaring contradiction here. The preoccupation with online safety, divorced from young people’s real lives, distracts politicians from being held accountable for the ruthless cuts they are making to education, healthcare and domestic violence shelters – things that would actually improve children’s mental health. Child safety is too urgent and serious an issue to be made into a Trojan Horse for authoritarianism. Responsible adults must redirect their moral panic to what actually matters: improving young people’s lives. Dr Kate Sim directs the children’s online safety and privacy research programme at the University of Western Australia’s Tech & Policy Lab.
Israel/Palestine 2 state solution. Starvation like Belsen. Haunting image of skeletal girl, 9, shows Gaza’s ‘catastrophic’ hunger crisis Nine-year-old Maryam Duvvas looks agonisingly thin while receiving treatment at a hospital in Gaza for severe malnutrition as the UN warns of “catastrophic hunger” in Palestine Desperately harrowing images continue to emerge from within the Gaza Strip as many children are alarmingly ill with hunger. A young Gazan girl has withered to skin and bone because of the food and water crisis gripping the Palestinian enclave. The haunting image shows nine-year-old Maryam Duvvas, who is now agonisingly thin as the UN warns of “catastrophic hunger” sweeping through Gaza. She is currently receiving treatment at Patient Friends Association Hospital in Gaza City and is in a critical condition with severe malnutrition. The war-battered Gaza Strip is on the brink of “irreversible humanitarian collapse” it was claimed today as at least 41 Palestinians were killed since dawn. It comes after furious Bob Geldof issued a desperate plea on Sky News to save babies in Gaza. We use your sign-up to provide content in ways you’ve consented to and improve our understanding of you. This may include adverts from us and third parties based on our knowledge of you. More info Gaza’s health officials said there have been six new deaths of locals from starvation or malnutrition, including a child, bringing the starvation toll to 184, including 94 children. Aid workers say desperation is so severe that many residents risk approaching aid hubs despite fears of Israeli fire and being killed or wounded. A local aid worker told al-Jazeera:“People are exhausted, malnourished and still willing to risk their lives to find food for their families.” And an aid official reportedly claimed Gaza is “spiraling into collapse” without a ceasefire, adding: “The situation is beyond catastrophic.” Six hundred retired Israeli security officials, including former heads of intelligence agencies, have asked US President Donald Trump to pressure Israel into ending war in Gaza. They said in a statement: “It is our professional judgement that Hamas no longer poses a strategic threat to Israel. Your credibility with the vast majority of Israelis augments your ability to steer Prime Minister Netanyahu and his government in the right direction: End the war, return the hostages, stop the suffering.”
EXCLUSIVE: Craig Murray: Israel lobby undermining UK rule of law through internment of political prisoners? Craig Murray, journalist and former ambassador, on proscription of Palestine Action court case that he attended – Israel-linked Leonardo arms group – SNP position – Foreign Office opinion. Huda Ammori Wins a Judicial Review of Palestine Action Proscription 114 Instead a court-appointed “Special Advocate” is supposed to represent their interests, without being allowed to tell them what the accusations are. Nor can they tell the special advocate what points to make, as in “we absolutely have no foreign funding and have never had any contact with any foreign intelligence agencies”. Nobody is ever allowed to know what a “Special Advocate” actually does or says in the closed session, nor what the government lawyers or those giving evidence on behalf of the security services do or say. If I were a Special Advocate, I would do nothing except hand the judge a copy of the Dossier on Iraqi Weapons of Mass Destruction, and say: “This shows the quality of security service intelligence. Now go and wipe your arse with it.” Having told us there had been a closed evidence process, Judge Chamberlain then gave us what he said would be a brief summary of his judgment. The link is to the full judgment. Chamberlain said that the claimant (Huda Ammori) had introduced evidence of police action against people expressing in various ways support for the Palestinian cause. There was also evidence of people deliberately breaking the law on support for proscribed organisations. The Home Secretary had submitted that the correct route for an appeal against proscription was to POAC (the Proscribed Organisations Appeals Commission). The Claimant had responded that this would take too long, until June 2026 at the earliest. There were five reasons that POAC might not be a viable alternative remedy to a judicial review: 1) Timing – the POAC process could not conclude before mid-2026. 2) The impact on freedom of expression and assembly while the proscription remained in force. 3) There would be numerous criminal proceedings over support for Palestine Action in magistrates’ courts and crown courts up and down the country, in each of which it might be argued that the proscription was itself unlawful. There was a danger of conflicting judgments in different localities. 4) The legislation did not specify that an appeal against proscription could only be through POAC. 5) A judicial review did not close off an eventual process through POAC. In assessing that a judicial review was a permissible route, he had declined to follow the judgment over the Kurdish Workers’ Party, because new court procedures (the Special Advocate nonsense) now permitted the courts to handle intelligence material, which they did not at the time of that case. Plus, that judgment was plainly wrong. This was stated with such offhand disdain as to be striking. Of course judges can differ, but the bland contempt of the phrasing and delivery were unusual: “plainly wrong” to a judge of equal standing. Which brings me to the unavoidable question of Chamberlain’s demeanour. Sometimes my powers as a writer are not equal to the occasion. I have never seen anybody quite as self-satisfied as Chamberlain; he radiates assurance. He is the walking antithesis of impostor syndrome. It is worse than smug: there is a palpable gloat about him. Judges in the Royal Courts are seated on an imposing tiered dais, many feet above the courtroom. Some judges attempt to diminish the distance; this can come over in different ways, from condescension to chumminess to intellectual equality. Chamberlain does not bother. He is quite happy that our only view of him is up his nostrils.
Netanyahu’s bid to fire attorney general blocked by Israel’s top court Attorney General Gali Baharav-Miara had repeatedly clashed with Netanyahu over his trial, judicial overhaul, and security interference The High Court of Israel has blocked the government’s attempt on 4 August to fire Attorney General Gali Baharav-Miara, ruling that she would retain all her authorities and that no replacement could be appointed until further review. The court’s decision came after Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s cabinet voted unanimously to dismiss Baharav-Miara, who is leading his prosecution in a long-running corruption trial. The cabinet decision was announced by Justice Minister Yariv Levin, who wrote to Baharav-Miara that she “should not try to impose herself on a government that has no trust in her and cannot work with her effectively.” The court ruling followed urgent petitions from opposition parties and civil groups, including the Movement for Quality Government in Israel, which said the vote had turned the role of attorney general into a “political appointment.” A court hearing is expected within 30 days. This marks the first time any Israeli government has attempted to fire an attorney general. In a letter to ministers hours before the vote, Baharav-Miara called the move “unlawful” and accused Levin of seeking a compliant legal advisor who would back efforts to exempt ultra-Orthodox yeshiva students from conscription and interfere in police investigations. She warned that her dismissal could influence Netanyahu’s trial and investigations involving his ministers and associates. The vote, postponed from the previous week, followed a ministerial committee hearing which Baharav-Miara refused to attend, saying participation would lend legitimacy to a foregone conclusion.
Dan Ashman protests outside government offices for lengthy periods around 28 hours to witness to the crimes going on inside 1. Downing Street, 2. the Home Office, 3. the Foreign Office, 4. The Metropolitan Police and this week 5. The Ministry of Justice . Evening contemplation outside ministry of Justice. Life is sacred vigil. CPS, Crown Prosecution ment to enforce the Geneva Convention through ICC Act 2001. It’s happening adults killing kids, adults aid and abet the killing of Palestinian families for money. Ceasefire. Shut it down illegal activity. I felt compelled to stand as a litigant-in-person; it was not an intellectual decision. At first I felt no fear. Later, even the possibility of having debts of tens of thousands of pounds wasn’t enough to deter me. I saw the court case as an opportunity to communicate and to find out whether the justice system is just. It did not matter that I’d never stepped inside a court room in my life. I received a lot of earache from those who feared for my future security and many people offered their support, for which I am grateful beyond words. Building and presenting my case was a true communal effort that forged new relationships. A healthy dose of reading and long discussions about Roman and Common Law kept me occupied while I Occupied. Research and strategy planning often went on right through the night. A relative stranger offered to assist me, I said “Why not?” and things started to fall into place. We referred to each other as ‘unlearned friends’. I arrived in court with no suit, bad breath, barely any sleep and fear in my belly. Then, out of nowhere, an upsurge of optimism rinsed away the what-have-I-done, rabbit-in-headlight state. According to the City of London Corporation their issue with the Occupy LSX camp has nothing to do with our call for transparency with regards to their financial dealings and undemocratic institutions. It has nothing to do with the reasons for encampment, nothing to do with the just cause, nothing to do with our challenge to the value system that benefits a small number of the global population. No, all the City is concerned about – so they say – is the tents, duvets, sleeping bags and pillows. The pristine buildings filled with people wearing smart attire are not used to dealing with a public who are there to do something more than sightsee.
Ex Shin Bet director, Ami Ayalon, on Netanyahu overstepping the mark. Over 600 ex-Israeli senior security officials urge Trump to end Gaza war. The group’s letter says the Israeli army has already achieved its objectives and the release of Israeli captives can be achieved only through a deal. A demonstrator holds a placard, as people protest in support of Israeli Attorney General Gali Baharav-Miara, and to demand the end of the war in Gaza and release of all hostages, outside Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s office in Jerusalem August 4, 2025 More than 600 former Israeli senior security officials have urged United States President Donald Trump to bring an end to Israel’s war on Gaza as deaths of dozens of Palestinians from Israeli-induced starvation have caused global outrage. The appeal was made in a letter sent to Trump on Sunday. Its signatories include former Mossad chief Tamir Pardo, former Shin Bet chief Ami Ayalon and former deputy Israeli army chief Matan Vilnai. They called for pressure on Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to end the nearly two-year conflict, which has devastated Gaza. The letter was sent as a furore grows over videos released by Palestinian groups showing two emaciated Israeli captives held in Gaza, where more than two million Palestinians are struggling to survive the starvation crisis. “Everything that could be achieved by force has been achieved. The hostages cannot wait any longer,” the Commanders for Israel’s Security (CIS) group said in a post on X, where it shared the letter. The letter said the Israeli army has achieved two of its three objectives by force, “dismantling Hamas’ military formations and governance”, but the third, bringing back all Israeli captives, can “only be achieved through a deal”. “Stop the Gaza War! On behalf of CIS, Israel’s largest group of former [military] generals and Mossad, Shin Bet, Police, and Diplomatic Corps equivalents, we urge you to end the Gaza war,” the letter read. “You did it in Lebanon. Time to do it in Gaza as well,” it added.
Does Israel have Trump and the US Government CAPTIVE Via Epstein Blackmail? Afshin Rattansi interviews former Mossad officer Ari Ben Menache about Mossad and Epstein. Birthday card to Epstein from Trump. On this episode of Going Underground, we speak to Ari Ben-Menashe, a former Israeli intelligence officer who alleges Jeffrey Epstein was an asset of Israel’s Mossad. He discusses why he believes the US is trapped by Israel to do nothing about the Gaza genocide, Jeffrey Epstein’s blackmailing of Ehud Barak and Bill Clinton to stop an agreement with Yasser Arafat for a two-state solution, how a number of US Presidents had been blackmailed by Israel using Jeffrey Epstein, how Rupert Murdoch’s first newspaper was funded for him by Israel, Trump wanting to bring peace to the Middle East but being held back by Israel via blackmail over Jeffrey Epstein, the brainwashing of Israelis during the Gaza genocide, the bombing of his house in Canada in 2012, how the UK got most of its military technology from Israel, Israel committing harakiri on itself over the Gaza genocide, why Donald Trump must end the Gaza genocide despite the blackmail, and much more. The world needs classes on how to identify, track, target and kill ALL neoliberalist Zionist elites, especially globalist cheerleaders like the Rothschilds, Warburg, Rockefellers, Wallenbergs, Mellon, Soros, Thyssens, Krupps and new money oligarchs such as Musk, Bezos, etc. The 3000 billionaires around the planet prevent 7 billion from having sustainably better, happier lives. Let’s act before technology makes it easy for 3000 billionaires to selectively kill us all
Middle East Eye – Lord Richard Dannett, ex Army Chief – we must crack down on activists. Peer sought to ‘influence’ Palestine Action case on behalf of US company Lord Dannatt, an ex-army chief and paid adviser to Teledyne, wrote to ministers urging them to crack down on Palestine Action after speaking to the firm A member of the House of Lords lobbied two ministers over a criminal investigation into Palestine Action activists on behalf of a US military technologies company. Richard Dannatt, an ex-army chief who works as an adviser to Teledyne Technologies, wrote to two Home Office ministers urging them to crackdown on activists after they targeted a factory belonging to the company in 2022 over sales of military equipment to Israel. Four activists were convicted of conspiring to damage Teledyne’s factory in Presteigne, Wales, after they broke into the premises and caused £1m ($1.33m) worth of damage, according to prosecutors. Dannatt wrote to then Home Secretary Suella Braverman after speaking with the factory’s general manager and another senior Teledyne member on 22 December 2022, warning that “the threat from Palestine Action has more widespread implications for security and the economy within the United Kingdom”. He said he would be “very grateful to receive assurance that the threat from Palestine Action is fully recognised by our security services and appropriate action [is] either planned or being taken”. Dannatt added that he had “undertaken to brief the Teledyne main board in the United States that the threat from Palestine Action in the UK is being suitably addressed”. In September 2024, Dannatt contacted Dan Jarvis, Labour security minister, citing renewed “attacks on Teledyne facilities”, and saying he would be “very grateful to receive assurance from the current government that the threat posed by Palestine Action continues to be fully recognised by our security services and that appropriate action is being taken”. An ‘invested interest’ Three of the activists who targeted the factory pleaded guilty, while the fourth went to trial. In court in May 2023, Alex Stuart of Dyfed-Powys police, who was in charge of the investigation, expressed concerns that Dannatt was seeking to have some input in the case. Stuart had written to four of his superiors on 19 December 2022 saying that a senior Teledyne executive based in the US “had spoken to Lord Richard Dannatt about Palestine Action”. “Lord Dannatt was chief of the army general staff. He’s now a life peer. He has an invested interest [sic] in this aspect of UK trade and investment, particularly military projects,” Stuart wrote in an email. He said that Dannatt “wants to have some input” in the investigation, adding that he had said “it would not be wise to have a member of the House of Lords poking around in a live criminal case”.
Declassified UK – Senior Israeli Officers training next to Downing St. Israeli army officers have been allowed to study at a British military academy in central London throughout the Gaza genocide, Declassified can reveal. At least two Israeli colonels have attended the prestigious Royal College of Defence Studies (RCDS) since 2023. One of the soldiers, thought to be Elad Edri, only graduated a fortnight ago. Another officer, Yeftah Norkin, completed the course in July 2024 and almost immediately led the army’s “Bang” division in Israel’s invasion of Lebanon. Norkin, who comes from an influential military family, commanded a patrol company in Operation Cast Lead, Israel’s 2008-9 war in Gaza which killed hundreds of children. ‘Rising stars’ Established in 1927 as the Imperial Defence College, the RCDS in Belgravia is one of Britain’s most eminent military academies. From its elegant Georgian building ringed by embassies, the college organises training for “rising stars” among the officer class from the UK and abroad. While Sandhurst teaches junior army officers, the RCDS mentors mid-ranking troops who have ambitions to climb the chain of command, awarding them a post-graduate certificate in international security studies. The college describes itself as “a world-renowned institution committed to developing strategic thinkers… who have the potential to reach the highest ranks”. RCDS alumni include Major General Hidai Zilberman, the former IDF spokesperson and now Israeli defence attaché to the US, and General Harel Knfao, who served as Chief of Staff of Israel’s Southern Command.
Videos of full shows – Essentials: Michael Hudson | Blackrock/Vanguard | Netanyahu at the 7/7 London Bombings | Why/how Israel Assassinated JFK & RFK | Operation Gladio | Tony on Brexit & (4th Reich) Traitors of Arnhem | Creation vs. Evolution | God vs. Lucifer | ‘Great Plan’ for 3 World Wars | Devil Worship: The Rise Of Satanism | Nuclear Armed IDF Doomsday Cult | Aanirfan | Armageddonists I have known: Nick Land (1976-8) | George Monbiot (1995-7) | Manna for the Revelation Generation: CONSPIRACY CLASSICS, longer interviews/lectures
Part Two – International news review, Accelerationist, Armageddonist reports and investigations
Sky News Hiroshima report from Japan. Anti nuclear protests all over UK. Two days when nuclear weapons killed hundreds of thousands On 6 August 1945, the US dropped an atomic bomb called “Little Boy” on Hiroshima in Japan. Three days later a second atomic bomb called “Fat Man” was dropped on the city of Nagasaki. The firestorm in Hiroshima destroyed five square miles of the city. Almost 63% of the buildings in Hiroshima were destroyed after the bombing and nearly 92% of the structures in the city were destroyed or damaged by blast and fire. Estimates of total deaths in Hiroshima range from 100,000 to 180,000, out of a population of 350,000. Casualties from Nagasaki are thought to be between 50,000 and 100,000. By 1950, over 340,000 people had died as a result and generations were poisoned by radiation. Hiroshima Day & Nagasaki Day The world says never again 2018 is the 73nd anniversary of the bombings. Help to make sure the destruction nuclear weapons has caused is never forgotten. Please attend a memorial in your area. Events are planned across the UK to mark Hiroshima Day on the 6th August and Nagasaki Day on the 9th August. Bath Birmingham Bradford Brighton Bromley Carshalton Chester Crawley Cumbria Edinburgh Exeter Finchley Greenwich Hastings Hereford Isle of Wight Keighley Kingston Leeds Leicester Lewisham London (Hiroshima) London (Nagasaki) Manchester (5th August) Manchester (6th August) Milton Keynes Nottingham Oxford Peebles Perth Redhill & Reigate Salisbury Sheffield Southampton St Albans Tavistock Wimbledon Woolwich Cherry blossom Many people picture cherry blossoms when they think of Japan. The custom of Hanami – cherry blossom viewing parties – is practiced across Japan during Spring. In Hiroshima and Nagasaki, hundreds of cherry blossom trees were planted in peace parks established in the decade after the atomic bombs destroyed the two cities. Cherry blossoms are therefore a symbol of peace and hope. Out of devastation, new life and beauty can grow if it is respected and nurtured as the cherry blossom trees in those cities are today. The Hibakusha “We are the survivors of the nuclear bombs that hit our home cities” The Never Again appeal ‘After I die, I want future generations to know what happened to us.’ – Tsutomu Yamaguchi, survivor of the Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombings Survivors of the Hiroshima and Nagasaki atomic bombings have helped drive the movement against nuclear weapons for over 70 years. Please donate to our appeal to make sure the stories of the Hibakusha continue to be told and strengthen our campaign to prevent another Hiroshima or Nagasaki.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OFaBzKIrnEQ
Putin and Ukraine war. Scott Ritter on Russia Ukraine war. Which regions of Ukraine does Putin want? Can Trump deliver peace? Oreshnik missile – not nuclear but very destructive. Scott Ritter is a former Major, Intelligence Officer, and UN Weapons Inspector. Ritter argues that the balance of power in Europe will shift as Russia announces it will no longer abide by the self-imposed restrictions on the deployment of nuclear-capable intermediate-range missiles.
Adil Raja on how he had to leave Pakistan suddenly to stop being put in prison for supporting jailed PM Imran Khan. My publications were in public interest, Adil Raja tells UK court Judge says ISI was not on trial at UK High Court as the case was between two individuals LONDON: Former Pakistan Army Major (retired) Adil Raja has told the UK High Court his claims and publications about the former sector commander Brigadier (retired) Rashid Naseer were in the public interest as the trial judge stated that Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) was not on the trial at the UK High Court as the case was between two individuals — Adil Raja vs Rashid Naseer. Adil Raja appeared at the London High Court by video link to continue giving his evidence in day three of the defamation case brought against him by Brigadier (retired) Rashid Naseer. Rashid Naseer’s counsel and London High Court Deputy Judge Richard Spearman KC asked Raja a series of questions during cross examination about the way he conducted his work as a journalist and about the nine publications over which Rashid Naseer is suing him. Raja conceded that he had not produced any documentary evidence for the trial, but maintained his position that he relied on his anonymous sources, which he said were high-ranking people in the intelligence services and the government. He also informed the court at numerous times that his publications were in the public interest and that he had verified and cross checked everything before publishing. As things heated up on the third day of the trial, London High Court Deputy Judge Richard Spearman KC made it clear that the ongoing defamation trial was about two individuals (Rashid Naseer versus Adil Raja) and had nothing to do with the alleged rights or wrongs of the Pakistani intelligence service the Inter Services Intelligence (ISI), the military or the government and that the ISI was not on the trial. As Adil Raja spoke about election manipulation and the complexities of Pakistani society and the establishment’s role, the Judge stated he understood how relevant this case is for Pakistan and the passion involved, but the case cannot be won by talking about the “big picture” of Pakistani politics as the allegations are specific about the claimant. Adil Raja was cross-examined for nearly the whole day by Counsel David Lemer for Rashid Naseer about the Tweets, YouTube and Facebook video he had published. At the heart of the case are nine publications. Raja made numerous accusations against Rashid Naseer in these nine publications. Adil Raja told the court that the allegations he made about Rashid Naseer were passed to him by credible sources in the Government and intelligence services and he had verified and cross-checked before publishing the material and took due care as a journalist and that all his publications were in the public interest. The Judge asked Adil Raja to explain what steps he took before publishing the statements on his social media accounts and what were his methods of obtaining, verifying, cross checking and authenticating the sources – and most importantly, if he took notes and kept written records of the information he was getting from the sources. Adil Raja replied: “My sources are based here and in Pakistan. I use layers to protect them. The information comes from sources in Pakistan to the layers in the UK who then pass the information to me.” He said he did this in order to protect his sources from harassment as they are placed at the highest levels in government and intelligence in Pakistan and revealing their identity would put them at risk of abductions and torture.
Putin’s peace demands as not reported anywhere in the ‘free’ west: give up four oblasts: Donetsk, Kherson, Lugansk and Zaporizhzhia as well as no NATO presence in Ukraine after the ceasefire. Tik Tok Ukrainian man refusing to be recruited for war. Trump – Ukraine Biden’s war. Odessa the key? British Empire like the Roman Empire? Anything good came out of it? Patrizia Opulenza poem. Trump reveals location for Putin summit The two leaders will meet in Alaska next week, the US president has said US President Donald Trump has said that he will meet his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin in Alaska next Friday. Kremlin aide Yury Ushakov confirmed immediately afterward that Moscow and Washington will be working on making the Alaska summit happen. “The highly anticipated meeting between myself, as President of the United States of America, and President Vladimir Putin, of Russia, will take place next Friday, August 15, 2025, in the Great State of Alaska,” Trump announced on Truth Social on Friday. According to the Kremlin, the upcoming meeting will revolve around reaching a longstanding peace in the Ukraine conflict. Moscow expects that the two leaders’ next meeting after this will take place in Russia, the presidential aide said. Trump has officially been sent an invitation, he added. The US president’s special envoy Steve Witkoff visited Moscow on Wednesday for a meeting with Putin that Trump later called “highly productive.” The US leader has expressed his growing impatience with the pace of peace talks dedicated to resolving the Ukraine conflict, and has threatened to impose further secondary sanctions on Russian trade partners. According to the Kremlin, Moscow had received an “acceptable” offer from the US during Witkoff’s visit. Russia had long said that it was interested in a peaceful resolution to the Ukraine conflict, but has insisted on one that brings about a permanent and stable peace. Russia and Ukraine have held three rounds of direct talks in Istanbul: in May, June, and late July. While the sides have failed to reach a breakthrough, they agreed to exchange prisoners of war and the bodies of fallen soldiers. Russia insists that a sustainable peace deal must include Ukraine’s commitment to stay out of NATO, demilitarization, and the recognition of the new territorial reality on the ground. Kiev has rejected these terms.
Was Adolf Hitler a prototype of the Antichrist prophesied in the Book of Revelation? David Livingstone on Peter Thiel Antichrist Revelation Apocalypse Now talk – For three years it was my good fortune, as a member of the Joint Panning Staff of the War Cabinet and therefore one of Churchill’s staff officers, to work in the fortress basement under Whitehall, from which the war was directed. I state this as evidence to my reader that I am no woolly-minded mystic, but have my feet very firmly planted on the ground. Unlike the majority of other planners, doubtless owing to the fact that I was already a well-known author, I was privileged to count among my friends General Lord Ismay, Major Desmond Morton and Commander ‘Tommy’ Thompson, R.N., who were resectively the Prime Minister’s Chief Staff Officer, his Personal Assistant, and his personal Aide-de-Camp, so were all constantly with him. All three lunched and dined with me, and I with them, on many occasions. I cannot believe that I would not have picked up at least a rumour of it from one of them, had our great war leader owed anything to the Power of Darkness. Hitler once confided to Hermann Rauschning that he was founding a secret order at the second stage of which a man-god would be worshipped throughout the world – and presumably Hitler intended to be that man. The Devil and All His Works, Dennis Wheatley, (Hutchinson 1971), Of Witches and Warlocks, Magic and the Fate of Nations, Page 282
‘Peter Levenda’s Unholy Alliance is at once a terrific read, an underground classic, and a major work of investigative reporting. Shinning a bright light on the darkest corners of ‘history’s basement, ‘ Levenda traces and explicates the origins of Nazi occultism from the theosophical enlightenment of the early 20th century to its recent resurgence in North and South America. Rich in documentation and insight, Unholy Alliance is a profound and fascinating book in the tradition of Louis Pauwel’s and Jacques Bergier’s The Morning of the Magicians.’ –Jim Hougan, author of Spooks and Secret Agenda Peter Levenda’s _Unholy Alliance_ is at once a tale of adventure and intrigue and a useful source of information on the occult origins of Nazism. Much has been made of these occult beginnings and developments which led to the creation of Hitler’s Third Reich and which have continued after its downfall in various forms of NeoNazism. In this book, Peter Levenda examines these occult aspects of Nazism from its early development in the Thule Society and among individuals such as Guido von List, Lanz von Liebenfels, and Rudolf von Sebottendorf to Nazi psychics up until the present day in which Satanism and other such dark forces have combined with Nazi occultism. Levenda rightly contends that Hitler himself was not overly influenced by occult ideas (contrary to the thesis put forth in _The Spear of Destiny_) despite his youthful readings of von Liebenfel’s notorious magazine, “Ostara”. However, according to Levenda the magical and occult aspects of Nazism cannot be denied. Levenda considers Nazism to be a sort of cult with an all powerful leader (“Der Fuehrer”). Much of the material in this book as far as the early roots of Nazism is available from other sources especially _The Occult Roots of Nazism_ by Nicholas Goodrick-Clark. However, Levenda provides new material in his examination of Nazi psychics, including Hanussen, his thorough discussion of the Ahnenerbe Society, his explanation of the Tibet expedition which has not previously been covered by other authors in this field, and his discussions of the notorious madman Aleister Crowley. In fact, a great deal of this book focuses on the shenanigans of Aleister Crowley but also discusses the roots of many German secret societies in the Theosophical Society of the medium Madame H. P. Blavatsky. The most interesting discussion in this book however is that of the survival of the Nazi cult in various manifestations particularly in South America. The far reaches of the tentacles of the Nazi octopus can be seen in the trail of Rudolf Hess, where he claims that he was being mind-controlled by various psychiatrists working for the Allied Powers. This is one among hundreds of bizarre instances involving the captured Nazi elite. The escaped Nazis may have traveled to South America via various underground channels. Individuals such as Klaus Barbie and Martin Bormann as well as the infamous physician, Dr. Josef Mengele, may have traveled to South America and survived in hiding under different aliases and involving themselves with various occult movements and lodges. The nation of Chile appears to be particularly likely to be infested with NeoNazis according to Levenda. Among others the occult writer and Chilean diplomat Miguel Serrano has written praising Hitler. Levenda himself investigated the secret Nazi center, the infamous “Colonia Dignidad”, in Chile.
This mysterious colony is run by the self-described “Baptist” zealot, Dr. Ernst Schafer, with unproven ties to Nazism. While in Chile, Levenda encountered this mysterious Nazi colony and barely managed to escape alive (luckily a report involving the statute of limitations on Nazi war crimes was being reviewed that day which may have allowed his escape). Rumors of mysterious deaths, torture, sexual abuse of children, and the practice of the black arts combining traditional Voodoo ritual with Nazi occultism have spread about the infamous “Colonia Dignidad”. Whatever exactly this colony consists of, it is certainly not a wholesome affair. In the last full chapter in this book, Levenda turns his attention to NeoNazism. In particular, he examines the question of Nazi Satanism (taking a look at such organizations as the former National Renaissance Party) as well as the phenomenon of Nazi Skinheads. Nazi Satanists appear to base their rites off of those performed by the ultimate black magician and Reichsfuehrer of the SS, Heinrich Himmler, which he performed in his mysterious castle, Wewelsburg. Levenda makes some decent comparisons and analysis of Nazism and the Satanic abduction scare (in which he compares such mass murderers as Charles Manson with Nazi occultism and Satanic practices). Ultimately, upon finishing this book, it is clear to the reader that the Nazis were indeed based on an occult system of practice. While I dislike the idea that this was some form of neopaganism, it is more likely a restoration of the Gnostic heresy and a revolt against the Catholic Church, Christianity, and the Semitic religions. Levenda is unfortunately too harsh on the Catholic Church in this respect giving into many modernist and liberal biases. It is a fact that the Church tried to protect many individuals from the evils of Nazism and its death camps, despite whatever else certain of its members may have done. Also, the case against Pope Pius XII’s involvement with Nazism is certainly far from being resolved in my mind at least. I believe Nazism constitutes a form of modern day Satanism and its ties to black magic and evil forms of occultism and degeneracy are all too apparent.
Radio4All download pages
COMPLETE SHOW AND FULL INTERVIEWS [right click to download]
#1 – Complete 4hr show – [right click to download]
Full interviews with…
#2 – EXCLUSIVE Craig Murray on legal implications of Palestine Action ban and lawless Netanyahu – 00:23:00
#3 – EXCLUSIVE Dan Ashman, Life Is Sacred Vigils outside Govt and Police Offices – 00:35:00
#4 – EXCLUSIVE Anita Bennett Baltic Wharf Green Goram Free Land and Planning Ruse – 00:15:00
#5 – Scott Ritter Judging Freedom Dialogue Works Trump To Visit Putin – 01:00:00
#6 – Ami Ayalon Shin Bet chief calls for Immediate end to Gaza War – 00:10:00
#7 – Israel Has Trump and US Govt CAPTIVE via Epstein Blackmail- Israeli Ex-Intel Officer Ari Ben-Menas – 00:25:00
#8 – EXCLUSIVE David Livingstone Followers of Rival Messiahs Contesting Revelation Narrative Peter Thel Nick Land – 01:12:00
#9 – Ali McForever The UKs Online Safety Act came from the Carnegie Foundation not Parliament – 00:09:00
#10 – EXCLUSIVE Adil Raja escape from Pakistan military junta and high court libel trial – 01:10:00
