Category: Politics Show with Tony Gosling

MP3 of Friday 13th February 2026 show [right click to download] (from c. 11pm) This week’s full interview mp3s, bottom of page. SHOW STARTS 17:00 London time FOR c. 3½ HRS TO c. 20:30 – OUR LIVE STREAM to Listen live online. Alt. live stream, DJ Plug Radio OR Download Show After Transmission HERE. Repeats 11 & 5 AM & PM daily on our stream
Download NOT THE BCFM POLITICS SHOW APP [ANDROID APP (1)] Alternatives [GITHUB (2)] and [APKPURE (3)] – or the [Apple App store] – PS. You can replace evil Google Play, which banned us, with [the Aurora store]
Only 31% trust the UK Press! – UK media oligopoly TONY’S BOOKS: Bilderberg.org – 2 PAPER–BACKS – TONY’S CHANNELS: Telegram – Bitchute – 911 forum – Radio4All – The Land Is Ours – VK – Twitter/X – Farcebook – Brighteon – Rumble – RT Live on Rumble –  Goebbelsesque YouTube: This show; Public Enquiry; Peter Borenius; i-Contact & Occult Geopolitics

Radio4All mp3 audio files usually available from 23:00 2-4hrs, after TX – we’ll credit you if you rebroadcast. Any probs. mp3s should be on alternative links below by then

Part One – Local and National News Review

Jeffrey Epstein SHOCKING INTERVIEW with Steve Bannon RAW & UNCUT – Epstein, Ghislaine affair – is Epstein still alive? Probably no. He was fairly low level. Recruited by Ghislaine Maxwell in the 1990s. His intelligence bosses didn’t want him testifying anywhere, ever, as it would compromise everything.  ‘Do you think you’re the devil himself?’: highlights from the bizarre, newly released Bannon-Epstein interview The interview, revealed in the latest tranche of Epstein files, was reportedly intended for a sympathetic documentary Steve Bannon, a one-time adviser to Donald Trump, has long styled himself as a populist nemesis of the global elites. Yet the latest release of Jeffrey Epstein files shows that he exchanged hundreds of friendly texts with the wealthy financier, discussing politics, travel and other topics. One of the biggest surprises in the files was a frank, two hour video in which Epstein – who exploited and abused dozens of young girls – is interviewed by Bannon at what appears to be Epstein’s New York home. In an esoteric, meandering conversation over nearly two hours, the men discuss economics – Bannon is a former Goldman Sachs investment banker – and philosophy as well as Epstein’s time in jail. They evidently paused filming just before the halfway point and then resumed, as Epstein’s glasses and shirt suddenly changed appearance. There is an easy familiarity between the two men that allows Bannon to call Epstein a “schmuck” and “criminal” and even ask if he is “the devil” fallen from paradise. At one point, Bannon comments: “There’s something deeply fucked up with you.” The interview also becomes an exercise in intellectual peacocking as they invoke Socrates, Isaac Newton and quantum physics but pay little attention to Epstein’s crimes. Epstein reveals himself to be a living museum of racial prejudice. Filmed around 2019, the interview was reportedly intended for a sympathetic documentary designed to polish Epstein’s tarnished reputation. Bannon has previously written and directed documentaries about topics including the financial crisis and the Clinton Foundation. Epstein was arrested in July 2019 and died in his jail cell in August. Here are some of the most notable and strange moments from the interview: 94 mins, 30 secs: human intelligence and intuition Epstein has some views to share on gender and race and it goes about as well as you would expect. He reflects on the limits of science and how it cannot describe romance. “I don’t know why I’m attracted to somebody – I don’t know,” he tells Bannon. “People are attracted to each other and some – everyone – has the same feeling. They’ve seen someone walk in the room and they say, oh, that person gives me a creepy feeling.” ‘I don’t know why I’m attracted to somebody’: Epstein gives views on intuition and gender – video Science cannot describe what such a “creepy feeling” means, he continues, adding that women have an “intuitive sense”. He goes on: “They have feelings and they’re able to deal in the realm of things that men, especially men like myself, find unexplainable. “Women have intuition. Men see things a bit differently. Men want to measure everything. Women are not really that interested in measuring.” 2 mins, 30 secs: the path to global influence Epstein outlines his ascent from a trader at Bear Stearns to a member of elite international boards. He attributes this rise to a fundamental shift in how power was perceived in the late 20th century. Epstein argues that until the mid-1970s, “name” and “reputation” (such as being a Rockefeller or head of General Motors) were the primary markers of brilliance. But with the advent of the calculator and statistical modelling, business shifted from character-based decisions to mathematical calculations. Epstein was brought on to the Rockefeller University board in the late 1980s specifically for his “financial expertise” to help balance statistical portfolio management for the prestigious research institution. He also describes his induction into the Trilateral Commission – a nongovernmental forum aiming to foster closer cooperation among the US, western Europe and Japan – founded by David Rockefeller, whose philosophy was that elected politicians are transient whereas businessmen provide the “stability and consistency” needed to run the world.

Struggling to search and navigate the Epstein files? Here is a visual guide The US Department of Justice has released three million files related to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. More details are emerging daily from the January 30 release of more than three million pages of documents by the US Department of Justice (DOJ), exposing the extraordinary breadth of Jeffrey Epstein’s social and financial circle, which included some of the world’s most powerful people. Epstein was an American financier and convicted sex offender who used his vast wealth and high-profile social connections to orchestrate a decade-long sex trafficking ring involving dozens of underage girls. list 3 of 4The Take: Jeffrey Epstein’s ‘one single cause’: Israel As news organisations and citizen journalists work their way through the vast amount of material, Al Jazeera gives you the background you need to know about Epstein, his criminal cases, infamous island, inner circle, and the latest DOJ release to help you better understand the story. How can you access the Epstein files? Under the Epstein Files Transparency Act, which was signed into law in the United States on November 19, 2025, the DOJ was meant to release all unclassified records related to Epstein and his accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell within 30 days. In total, the DOJ identified six million pages of evidence. But so far, it has only released 3.5 million pages, including some 180,000 images and 2,000 videos. The pages consist of email chains, text messages, internal investigative reports, news articles and other material tied to Epstein, including bank statements, wire transfer records, flight logs, and FBI interview summaries. The files are organised into 12 separate data sets, each containing different categories of evidence as follows: Data Sets 1-8: Contain the bulk of FBI interview summaries and police reports from Palm Beach, Florida, between 2005 and 2008. Data Set 9: Contains email evidence, including private correspondence between Epstein and high-profile individuals, as well as internal DOJ correspondence regarding the 2008 non-prosecution agreement that granted broad federal immunity to Epstein and his potential coconspirators. Data Set 10: Contains 180,000 images and 2,000 videos seized from Epstein’s properties. These materials are heavily redacted, featuring numerous blacked-out boxes that the DOJ says are in place to protect potential victims. However, this has been criticised for allowing some victims to remain identifiable while shielding potential perpetrators. Data Set 11: Contains financial ledgers, flight manifests to Epstein’s island in the US Virgin Islands, and property seizure records. Data Set 12: Contains late productions and supplemental items of approximately 150 documents that require more detailed legal review. Compared to large data leaks and investigations, the Epstein files rank among some of the largest in terms of the number of documents.

Maria Farmer on 60 Minutes, Australia – she worked for Ghislaine and explains what she saw. ‘Imperious’ Ghislaine Maxwell handed out 58-page manual to staff who worked for Jeffrey Epstein that told them to refer to her as ‘lady of the house,’ stuff Epstein’s car with $100 bills and ‘see nothing, say nothing’ of pedophile’s activities Jeffrey Epstein’s housekeeper Juan Alessi revealed Ghislaine Maxwell’s ‘imperious’ nature after working at their Palm Beach mansion Alessi took the stand on Thursday during the fourth day of Maxwell’s sex trafficking trial Alessi revealed Maxwell had handed staff members a 58 page manual that instructed them how to cater to the couple He said that staffers ran the mansion like a ‘five star hotel’ as they were expected to wash Epstein’s car, stuff it with $100 bills, and avoid eye contact with him Maxwell also forbade the staff from fraternizing with the guests as they were told ‘see nothing, hear nothing say nothing’ ‘I was supposed to be blind, deaf and dumb and say nothing of their lives’, he said Jeffrey Epstein’s former housekeeper revealed the ‘imperious’ nature of Ghislaine Maxwell while he was employed under the couple. Juan Alessi, 72, took the stand Thursday during the fourth day of Maxwell’s sex trafficking trial and revealed how she wanted the house run like a ‘five-star hotel,’ which included washing Epstein’s car, stuffing it with $100 bills and avoiding eye contact with him, as Maxwell claimed he detested it. Staff were handed a 58-page ‘Household Manual’ – dated February 14, 2005 – filled with demands: ‘Try and anticipate the needs of Mr. Epstein, Ms. Maxwell and their guests;’ ‘Do not discuss personal problems with guests;’ ‘Unobtrusive is the key;’ ‘SMILE!’ and ‘NEVER disclose Mr. Epstein or Ms. Maxwell’s activities or whereabouts to anyone.’ One bullet on the checklist read: ‘See nothing. Say nothing.’ When asked by prosecutor Maurene Comey what he understood that meant, Alessi replied: ‘I was supposed to be blind, deaf, to say nothing.’ In the master bedroom, staff were to ensure a gun was placed in a bedside table drawer, shutters were closed, and that reading glasses, eye masks and ‘Jeffrey Epstein large and small notepads’ were on both bedside tables. Maxwell demanded the staff use ‘proper language’ with a list of things ‘you don’t say’: ‘Yeah,’ ‘Sure,’ ‘No problem,’ ‘You bet,’ ‘Gotcha,’ ‘Right’ and ‘I dunno.’ When complimented, according to the manual, they should respond: ‘You are very kind’ and ‘Thank, you, Ms. ____. I enjoy doing it.’ Alessi’s other duties were to make breakfast at 5 a.m. and bathe Maxwell’s dog – a Yorkshire Terrier called Max. He told the court he was expected to be up at the crack of dawn to make the food rather than Epstein’s professional cooks, ‘because the chefs have the privilege to sleep in.’ Alessi also said that part of his job was to clean up after Epstein’s massages – which he said Maxwell scheduled three times per day and which usually took place in his bathroom. Asked by the prosecutor if he ever found anything ‘unexpected’ after the massages, Alessi said that he found a ‘large dildo,’ describing it as ‘a huge man’s penis with two heads.’ Alessi did not clarify whether it was the sex toy called a ‘Twin Torpedo’ referred to by prosecutors in pretrial filings. Alessi said that he put gloves on and ‘ran it under the water and put the dildo in Ms. Maxwell’s closet in (her) bathroom’ inside of a wicker basket. Alessi said that he saw ‘pornographic tapes and a black leather costume’ in the same basket. He said that three or four other times he found two other sex toys: one that looked ‘like a pillow’ and another that looked like an ‘arm’ which had a rubber vibrating part at the end. He put those items in Epstein’s dresser, Alessi said.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P5Bg-gQEzFQ

‘Epstein’s Shadow: Ghislaine Maxwell’ documentary.

Low Key DDN – Ghislaine a Mossad agent.

Robert Maxwell death in 1991 – suicide? Seymour Hersch – The Samson Option theory.

Low Key – Starmer’s change of tune on Mandleson, the Israel lobby,

Palantir and creative chaos. Con men selling tech to government. Israel lobby effect on Labour.

The Scouser Oracle – Implementation of Palantir in NHS. Low Key – complicity of Press as Mandleson questioned about Labour and anti Semitism – not Epstein. Epstein and Russia.

What3Words: Fugitive Israeli spy Peter Mandelson’s KNOWN Wiltshire home Stir.Tougher.Wolves and ALLEGED bolt hole  – Chess.Roofer.Detained. Tony’s map showing cosy Rothschild triangle. Matt Williams’ film of alleged bolt hole.

Joshua Gold – his theatre group put on an event for Holocaust Memorial Day, and he mentioned genocide in Gaza, leading to dismantlement of group.

Afshin Rattansi – Palestine Action deemed not a terrorist group in court.

Nick Georges, pro Palestinian campaigner – fractured skull, nearly killed on a peaceful protest by Tommy Robinson types and Police did nothing – Filton Six have been let off – Filton 24 – Israel lobby.

BBC pathetic fight wasting our money with Trump over their obviously misleading deliberate edit of Trump’s speech.

Videos of full shows – Essentials: Michael Hudson | Blackrock/Vanguard | Netanyahu at the 7/7 London Bombings | Why/how Israel Assassinated JFK & RFK | Operation Gladio | Tony on Brexit & (4th Reich) Traitors of Arnhem | Creation vs. Evolution | God vs. Lucifer | ‘Great Plan’ for 3 World Wars | Devil Worship: The Rise Of Satanism | Nuclear Armed IDF Doomsday Cult | Aanirfan | Armageddonists I have known: Nick Land (1976-8) | George Monbiot (1995-7) | Manna for the Revelation Generation: CONSPIRACY CLASSICS, longer interviews/lectures

Part Two – International news review, Accelerationist, Armageddonist reports and investigations

Nick Georges – is Mandleson in Israel? Starmer – Board of Peace – is ‘peace’ in Gaza working?

Mohammed Morandi, RT, on celebrations in Iran on anniversary of revolution. Press TV, General Abolfarsl Shekarchi on Western false media narratives about Iran.

The Mail – former PM threesome with Ghislaine. Cuba, Trump and oil.

Ancient God Baal image set on fire in Iran.

Afshin Rattansi – Arin Ben Menashe, former Mossad, on Israel holding back sensitive Epstein files.

Why George Galloway has moved abroad.

Peter Riley on the Dalet Plan – Zionist plan to ethnically cleanse Palestine/ Israel of Arabs since 1800s. Israel as Britain’s colonial project partly to protect Suez Canal. A Historical Survey Of Proposals To Transfer Arabs From Palestine 1895 -1947 – by Rabbi Dr. Chaim Simons – What do the Zionist leaders Theodor Herzl, David Ben-Gurion and Chaim Weizmann have in common with the American Presidents Franklin D. Roosevelt and Herbert Hoover, the pro-Arab Harry St. John Philby, King Abdullah of Transjordan, a British Royal Commission, and the British Labour Party? They all advanced proposals, for the transfer of Arabs from the area then known as Palestine. This book details and discusses these proposals. The period covered in this book is from the diary entry of Theodor Herzl, one of the founders of the Modern Zionist movement in 1895 to the period of the United Nations decision to establish a Jewish State in 1947 in what was then known as Palestine. This book was meticulously researched using archival material from 27 archives in countries throughout the world, namely Israel, U.S.A., England and Australia. Many of these documents being extremely rare. This archival material is complemented by information from some 150 books, about 85 newspapers and journals, and in addition the internet and private communications. Altogether the book contains over 1,700 references and is about 660 pages long. Photocopies have been made of over 400 items of the source material referred to in this book. Readers may put in a request to my e-mail chaimsimons@gmail.com for these photocopied source materials to be sent to their e-mails without charge. In the course of this book, contemporary arguments both for and against the various plans are discussed, and historical background material is included, with brief biographies of prominent personalities. One of the things which I discovered during research on this book was that many proposers confined the exposition of their ideas to diaries, private correspondence and closed meetings. In contrast, in public they either ignored the subject of transfer or spoke against it, sometimes vehemently! Even those who did propose various schemes were often reluctant to specifically suggest compulsory transfer. They relied on various euphemistic expressions to convey their intentions regarding compulsion. I have therefore made it an important aim of this work to ascertain the private views of the proposers on this subject. The wording of their proposals has also been carefully analysed to determine whether the transfer of the Arabs from Palestine was intended to be compulsory or voluntary. One of the striking things to come to light during this research is the attempt to rewrite history and pretend that the Zionist leaders were completely opposed to the transfer of Arabs, even to the extent of censoring portions of official minutes and the amending of documents where they had proposed transfer! This rewriting is reminiscent of the Russian Encyclopaedia. [After Beria’s execution, the publishers of this encyclopaedia wrote to its subscribers, suggesting they cut out the pages dealing with “Beria” and in their place insert the enclosed pages on the “Bering straits” – which had the same alphabetical sequence! – (BERIa, BERIng).]

International Terrorism Films – Early Israeli Terrorism. Jews coming on boats to Israel encouraged by Zionists. Before Calling Others Terrorists, Israel Should Read Its Own History History, if left unexamined, becomes a weapon of hypocrisy. Today, Israel condemns Palestinian resistance movements as “terrorist,” “fanatical,” and “barbaric,” yet its very birth was midwifed by organizations that the British once called the same. Between 1931 and 1948, the Irgun (Etzel), Lehi (the Stern Group), and the Haganah – Zionist paramilitary formations operating in British-mandate Palestine – used insurgent tactics to carve a state from the ruins of empire. They carried out actions that the British, the UN, and even mainstream Jewish leaders sometimes labeled terrorist, subversive, or guerrilla. What we call Israel’s independence was, to the other side, the destruction of a nation not yet allowed to be born. As early as 1899, even before the first kibbutz, Zionist thinkers such as David Trietsch were urging Theodore Herzl to include “Greater Palestine” in the Basle Programme, arguing that ten million Jews could not be “fit into a land of 25,000 square kilometers.” This vision, as historian S. Shamir Hassan noted, revealed “the inner logic of Zionist policies” – a movement bound to use expansion and force as its political grammar. Violence, from the very beginning, was not an accident of history but an instrument of ideology. Each movement justified its violence through an idea of redemption. The Haganah (1920-1948) saw itself as a disciplined “defense” force protecting Jewish settlements while preparing for sovereignty. Founded in 1920 as the defense organization of the Yishuv (the Jewish community in Palestine), it aligned with mainstream labor Zionism and generally operated under a doctrine of restraint. Yet it was never purely defensive: its elite strike arm, the Palmach, created in 1941, carried out sabotage and guerrilla missions first against Axis powers, then against Arabs and British forces alike. By the mid-1940s, David Ben-Gurion and Haganah commanders had accepted that driving the British out was the only way forward. By 1945, the Haganah entered a unified “Resistance Movement” with Irgun and Lehi, coordinating attacks on British railways, police stations, and communications lines. When Israel was founded in May 1948, both the Haganah and its elite strike force, the Palmach, were absorbed into the newly created Israel Defense Forces (IDF), transforming clandestine warfare into state legitimacy and forming the operational backbone of the nascent army. The Irgun (Etzel – “National Military Organization”), founded in 1931 and led at times by Menachem Begin, who would later become Israel’s prime minister, broke away from the Haganah to embrace Ze’ev Jabotinsky’s Revisionist Zionism – A creed rooted in the conviction that only force, through armed struggle, could redeem and secure a homeland. In July 1938, Irgun bombings tore through Haifa’s Arab market, killing more than seventy civilians. On July 22, 1946, it blew up the King David Hotel in Jerusalem, killing ninety-one people – Jews, Arabs, and Britons alike…

MP3 of Friday 6th February 2026 show [right click to download] (from c. 11pm) This week’s full interview mp3s, bottom of page. SHOW STARTS 17:00 London time FOR c. 3½ HRS TO c. 20:30 – OUR LIVE STREAM to Listen live online. Alt. live stream, DJ Plug Radio OR Download Show After Transmission HERE. Repeats 11 & 5 AM & PM daily on our stream
Download NOT THE BCFM POLITICS SHOW APP [ANDROID APP (1)] Alternatives [GITHUB (2)] and [APKPURE (3)] – or the [Apple App store] – PS. You can replace evil Google Play, which banned us, with [the Aurora store]
Only 31% trust the UK Press! – UK media oligopoly TONY’S BOOKS: Bilderberg.org – 2 PAPER–BACKS – TONY’S CHANNELS: Telegram – Bitchute – 911 forum – Radio4All – The Land Is Ours – VK – Twitter/X – Farcebook – Brighteon – Rumble – RT Live on Rumble –  Goebbelsesque YouTube: This show; Public Enquiry; Peter Borenius; i-Contact & Occult Geopolitics

Radio4All mp3 audio files usually available from 23:00 2-4hrs, after TX – we’ll credit you if you rebroadcast. Any probs. mp3s should be on alternative links below by then

Part One – Local and National News Review

Martin enjoyed watching a 1989 Peter Greenaway film at Tony’s flat this week: ‘The Cook, the Thief, His Wife & Her Lover’ by Peter Greenaway [watch here] (1989): Subversive Screenwriting The Cook: Art and Civilization. The Thief: Tyranny and Excess. The Wife: Rebellion and Awakening. Her Lover: Intellect and Passion [the screenplay]. In the realm of cinema, few films have managed to shock, provoke, and captivate audiences quite like Peter Greenaway’s 1989 masterpiece, ‘The Cook, the Thief, His Wife & Her Lover’. This audacious work of art stands as a testament to the power of subversive screenwriting, challenging conventional storytelling norms and pushing the boundaries of what cinema can achieve. In this article, we’ll delve into the intricate layers of Greenaway’s screenplay, exploring how it exemplifies subversive writing techniques that continue to influence filmmakers and writers today. The Art of Subversion: Defying Expectations At its core, subversive screenwriting is about defying expectations and challenging the status quo. Greenaway’s screenplay for ‘The Cook, the Thief, His Wife & Her Lover’ does this on multiple levels, from its structure to its themes and character development. Unconventional Structure Unlike traditional three-act structures, Greenaway’s screenplay unfolds in a series of tableaux, each centered around elaborate meals in a high-end restaurant. This structure mirrors the ritualistic nature of fine dining while simultaneously subverting it by juxtaposing refinement with grotesque violence and base human desires. The film’s pacing is deliberate and unhurried, allowing tension to build slowly and inexorably. This defies the conventional wisdom of maintaining a brisk pace to keep audiences engaged. Instead, Greenaway creates a sense of mounting dread and fascination that keeps viewers transfixed. Blurring Genre Lines ‘The Cook, the Thief, His Wife & Her Lover’ resists easy categorization, blending elements of drama, dark comedy, crime thriller, and even surrealism. By refusing to adhere to genre conventions, Greenaway creates a unique viewing experience that keeps the audience off-balance and engaged. This genre-defying approach allows the screenplay to explore its themes from multiple angles, creating a rich tapestry of meaning that resists simple interpretation.

Epstein files released – but really nasty stuff not released – meaning there is really nasty stuff! Palestine Action activists cleared of aggravated charges after break-in at Israeli defence firm – no verdict. THE FILTON TRIAL – THE VERDICTS – NO CONVICTIONS – FIVE BAILED Verdicts delivered on the six young people who have spent seventeen months on remand and eight weeks in court Six members of Palestine Action took part in a direct action against the Filton R&D facility of Elbit Systems in August 2024. (This action took place a whole year before Yvette Cooper’s controversial proscription of the organisation – the decision that a Judicial Review is likely to hand down its ruling on, in the coming days.) The six young people have been in prison on remand for 17 months and their trial began on November 17th 2025 at Woolwich Crown Court in front of Mr Justice Johnson. The defendants are Charlotte Head, Samuel Corner, Leona Kamio, Fatema Zainab Rajwani, Zoe Rogers and Jordan Devlin. All six are charged jointly on three counts: Aggravated burglary (Section 10 of Theft Act 1968) Criminal damage (Section 1 of Criminal Damage Act 1971) Violent disorder (Section 2 of Public Order Act 1986) As well as the three counts listed above, Samuel Corner faces an additional charge under Section 18 of the Offences Against The Person Act 1861, of causing grievous bodily harm with intent.The jury have options in his case of finding him guilty of lesser offences – these could be Grievous Bodily Harm, Actual Bodily Harm With Intent, or Actual Bodily Harm. All defendants have pled not guilty. The jury began deliberating on Tuesday 13th January, but illness and other factors mean that several days have been lost along the way, and it’s taken around 8 full days to reach this point.

With Mandelson’s blessing, Starmer set up his own Labour leadership team six months before Corbyn’s 2019 defeat… The Arlington Road Gang (Left to Right) – Downing Street Chief of Staff, Morgan McSweeney – Prime Minister Kier Starmer – Nick Smith, MP for Blaenau Gwent and Rhymney, with his wife, – Baroness Jenny Chapman, ex-MP – Baron Andrew Adonis of Camden, ex-minister – Georgia Gould, MP for Queen’s Park and Maida Vale – Tulip Siddiq, MP for Hampstead and Highgate Thanks to Wolfgang Airvent Brabinger for the names and pic.. – Jeremy Corbyn on Katie Halper Show – disaster is coming – Jeremy Corbyn’s warning. Labour Arlington Road group took a secret £700,000 from Israeli donors to help destroy Corbyn and elect Starmer as Labour leader. Morgan McSweeney: the man running Britain and his ties to Israel.  Starmer set up own Labour leadership team six months before Corbyn’s 2019 defeat A new biography has revealed how the Labour leader and his allies planned his challenge in advance of the election Keir Starmer had assembled a leadership team about six months before the December 2019 general election that led to Jeremy Corbyn’s resignation as Labour leader. The team, codenamed the “Arlington Group”, began planning in earnest how Starmer could capture the leadership from June of that year – including a detailed breakdown of how Labour’s membership could be convinced to support him. The revelation is made in a new biography of the Labour leader, Keir Starmer: The Biography, by Tom Baldwin, a former journalist who served as one of Ed Miliband’s advisers during his time leading the party. The group was formed as early as 2018 when Jenny Chapman, who was Darlington MP, asked him if he had ever thought about being the party’s leader. Starmer is said to have replied that it was something he “might want to do”. Meetings then began to take place on Monday mornings around the kitchen table at her home. Its codename was derived from the road in London where one of them lived. Those involved said that there was never a plan to topple Corbyn – the failed coup against him in 2016 had proved that it would be almost impossible to do so. Starmer is also said to have refused to acknowledge at that stage that he would be running. “Keir used to have this lawyerly phrase of: ‘I want to be in a position to consider standing – should a vacancy arise,’” said one of those involved. However, the preparations being made for a leadership attempt kicked into another gear in June 2019 with the arrival of an official that Starmer referred to as “the new guy”. It turned out to be Morgan McSweeney, now Labour’s influential campaigns director. Some were initially sceptical of McSweeney, who had also overseen Liz Kendall’s ill-fated leadership challenge in 2015, when she won less than 5% of the vote. However, he presented detailed research into the Labour membership – who would largely decide the identity of the party’s next leader – and how a winning coalition could be formed. “He got out his slide deck,” recalled Chris Ward, a former Starmer aide. “He ran through exactly where the membership was on every question, which bits of it we could get, which bits we couldn’t. It was brilliant. Afterwards, when we’re walking back, Keir had this little grin on his face, and was like: ‘D’you see what I mean now?’”

Sky’s Beth Rigby questions PM over decision to appoint Mandelson. Richard Burgeon MP on Mandelson. Wes Streeting – Mandelson must suffer the consequences of his actions. Labour rebels force Starmer into humiliating climbdown on Mandelson files Prime minister’s own integrity and judgement under scrutiny as he admits he knew of Peter Mandelson’s ongoing relationship with Epstein – but appointed him US ambassador anyway Starmer admits he was aware of Mandelson’s relationship with Epstein when making appointment Sir Keir Starmer’s leadership has been plunged into turmoil after furious Labour MPs forced him into a humiliating climbdown over the release of full vetting documents relating to Peter Mandelson’s appointment as the UK’s ambassador in the US. The prime minister’s dramatic U-turn followed intense pressure, led by former deputy prime minister Angela Rayner, just hours after he admitted that he knew about Lord Mandelson’s continued friendship with the paedophile Jeffrey Epstein – but appointed him as US ambassador anyway. Despite the revelation, which led many to question Sir Keir’s integrity and judgement, he insisted he was repeatedly lied to by the disgraced peer, who he said had “betrayed our country” over the alleged leak of sensitive government documents to the disgraced financier. On Wednesday night, ministers and other senior figures in Labour gave the prime minister an ultimatum that he must sack his controversial chief of staff, Morgan McSweeney, who pushed for Lord Mandelson’s appointment as ambassador and brought him back into the heart of the government. One minister told The Independent: “Morgan has to go – and should have gone months ago.” The prime minister had attempted to restrict the publication of the vetting documents, arguing that some details would need to be redacted on national security grounds. That prompted accusations from Labour MPs that he was engaging in a “cover-up”. After three hours into a Commons humble address debate on Wednesday, Sir Keir relented after Ms Rayner intervened to make it clear she would be supporting the Tory proposal for the independent Intelligence and Security Committee (ISC) to decide which documents could be published. It is unclear when the documents will be released to the committee and made public, but there is speculation that they could be available as early as Thursday. Seizing on the U-turn, a Conservative spokesperson said: “Kemi [Badenoch] forced Starmer to admit he’d known Mandelson was still hanging out with Epstein after the child sex conviction, and No 10 went ahead and appointed Mandelson anyway.

Misconduct in public office? What do emails between Mandelson and Epstein say? Newly released emails between Lord Mandelson and Jeffrey Epstein date back to when he was serving as a senior minister in Gordon Brown’s government Email exchanges published in the US indicate Lord Mandelson was in close contact with the disgraced late financier during a period in which he was at the heart of government amid the financial crisis. The emails suggest Lord Mandelson gave Epstein advance notice of an impending EU bailout, sent him internal government information about the state of the UK economy and lobbied the Treasury on banking policy at Epstein’s suggestion. We are still reviewing the millions of documents related to Epstein published by the US Justice Department but here is what has emerged about Lord Mandelson so far. Forwarding internal government information to Epstein One exchange in the newly released emails suggests Lord Mandelson forwarded internal government information to Epstein in June 2009, at which point he was acting as Gordon Brown’s business secretary and de facto deputy prime minister. Nick Butler, a policy adviser to the then-prime minister, wrote a memo about the UK’s struggling economy in which he recommended selling off government-held assets in order to raise public funds. He copied several people into the email, including Lord Mandelson. The published documents appear to suggest Lord Mandelson forwarded that internal government communication to Epstein, with the message: “Interesting note that’s gone to the PM.” In response to Epstein asking, “what salable [sic] assets?”, a reply from a redacted email address said: “Land, property I guess.” Lord Mandelson has been approached for comment.Advance notice of EU bailout for Greece Another exchange indicates Lord Mandelson gave Epstein advance notice of a €500bn bailout by the EU to save the ailing Euro. In the early hours of 10 May 2010, EU finance ministers agreed the deal amid concerns that a debt crisis in the Greek economy could spread to the wider Eurozone. The evening before the announcement, Epstein emailed Lord Mandelson to say: “sources tell me 500 b euro bailout , almost complete.” The released documents also appear to show Lord Mandelson told Epstein: “Sd be announced tonight.” Epstein then asked if Mandelson was home and received a reply, saying: “Just leaving No10..will call.” The UK did not contribute to the bailout, but then-chancellor Alistair Darling was present in Brussels for the negotiations. Lord Mandelson has been approached for comment.

BBC QT Dia Yusuf, Reform, on Labour sleaze and Mandelson. BBC QT Oli Dugmore, New Statesman, on Mandleson. Journalist hailed for ‘chilling’ Question Time speech on ‘disgusting’ Labour A JOURNALIST delivered a chilling speech on Labour’s “extraordinary” appointment of Peter Mandelson as US ambassador on Question Time. The studio audience were stunned into silence as the New Statesman’s Oli Dugmore lay bare his shock at revelations over the past week, including that Keir Starmer knew that Mandelson had continued his friendship with Jeffrey Epstein after the late paedophile’s conviction when he appointed him as US ambassador. The admission that came during Prime Minister’s Questions this week has led to some MPs suggesting Starmer’s position may now be untenable, as well as that of his chief of staff Morgan McSweeney. Dugmore was on the panel alongside Reform UK head of policy Zia Yusuf, Labour MP Emma Reynolds, Conservative MP Julia Lopez and LibDem MP Munira Wilson. Dugmore began by saying: “I’m generally a pretty forgiving person and I think our politics is poorer for its lack of empathy. “I think most people should not be defined by the worst thing they’ve ever done in their lives and most people deserve a second chance. “I do, however, have some moral boundaries, and one of them is I think it is wrong to have sex with children and I wouldn’t want to be friends with anyone that did that and I certainly wouldn’t want to work with them. If I did, I think you’d all be asking me questions and they’d be valid ones. “That is apparently now a fringe position for some people at the top of the Labour Party which is an extraordinary thing to be able to say. “I don’t know about you, I don’t know any paedophiles, I don’t know anyone that’s run a sex trafficking ring, these are extraordinary things we are talking about here.” Dugmore went on to talk about reports showing how people at the top of the Labour Party knew about Mandelson staying in Epstein’s house while he was in prison. To nervous laughter from the audience, he said: “They [Labour bosses] didn’t think that was disqualifying, they thought actually ‘this is our guy’. “This is our guy that we’re going to elevate to the most prestigious diplomatic posting that we have, we’re going to make him our man in Washington. Not only that, we’re going to bring him back to London every so often to advise on some Cabinet reshuffles, and actually when we’re choosing our candidates for the 2024 General Election, we’re going to let him put in on that too because we think he’s a great judge of character. “Like, come on.” The audience applauded his speech which has been widely shared on social media. Aaron Bastani, co-founder of Novara Media, said Dugmore had shown how “utterly monstrous” the situation was. “The facts, put plainly, sound utterly monstrous – and a genuine low for British politics,” he posted on Twitter/X. “It’s over.” Dugmore himself commented below the clip: “It’s disgusting.

Court case for van dwellers in Bristol this week. BBC PM – Hannah Miller report on van dwellers in Bristol. Trial date set as Downs ‘van dwellers’ saga nears an end About 45 vehicles remained parked on roads surrounding the park in north Bristol The number of vehicles parked around the Downs has dropped recently Bristol City Council is set for a court showdown as it moves to permanently ban people living in vehicles from the roads around the Downs. Article continues below In November, the council said it would seek to move people on from the Downs after designating the group of vehicles there as a ‘high impact’ site, due to what the council said was evidence of people using the area as a toilet. Nonetheless, about 45 vehicles remain parked on roads along the outside of the green space in leafy north Bristol. At its peak, the Downs ‘encampment’ consisted of about 150 vehicles. Now, a trial date has been set where the council will apply to have vehicles permanently barred from the area. At the trial, on April 16, the council will apply for a possession order for the roads, allowing them to evict people living in vehicles there, and then an injunction to prevent them from returning have the vehicles still occupying roads along the perimeter of the Downs. The court hearing will allow people on both sides of the debate to have their say; the council has until February 26 to publish a map detailing the proposed new exclusion zone, along with details of how people can take part in the court case. At a brief hearing outlining next steps in the long-running saga at Bristol Civil Justice Court on Thursday (February 5), the court heard from both critics and supporters of people living in vehicles. Alan Jenkinson, appearing on behalf of Protect The Downs – a group of locals who have waged a long campaign against the so-called van dwellers – said he wanted the scope of the proposed injunction to be extended to include other roads in the area. “We support the council’s application,” he said. “I would implore the court to extend the broad nature of the injunction to other roads. “We know from our experience and we’ve got substantial evidence to prove the danger to the public of allowing inhabitations on the roads. “(The vehicles pose a) real risk and threat to the community in the area.” Although the council has repeatedly promised to engage with the people still living in vehicles in the area to better understand their circumstances, there is limited evidence to suggest they have done so. Gerard Winstanley, from the Bristol Housing Action group, said more needed to be done to make sure people living in vehicles in the area had their say on their future. “We’ve had virtually no representation whatsoever from the people who are targeted by this exclusion order,” he said. “There are roughly 45 vehicles in the area. As part of our submission, what I’d just ask is that there’s more deliberate publicity given to the times and dates that these orders are being sought so that people can at least find out what the council intends to do and when.” Mr Winstanley said BHA would seek to be included as a party acting against the council in April’s trial. The council will also apply to extend a separate injunction which currently bars people from parking on the grass itself. That injunction is due to expire on July 25. Robin Denford, appearing on behalf of the council, said:“The injunction that has been granted already has worked extremely well,” citing the example of one trespasser who had been dealt with without any issues in January.

Rev Paul Williamson, former Vicar, on his protest at event ordaining Sarah Mullally as Archbishop – Sarah Mullally safeguarding failures. A retired vicar who objected to the confirmation of Sarah Mullally as Archbishop of Canterbury during the ceremony at St Paul’s Cathedral has told Premier he felt he had no other option after being repeatedly ignored by the Church of England when he has raised safeguarding issues. Rev Paul Williamson, who was priest in charge of St George’s Hanworth until he reached the church retirement age of 70, was escorted from the cathedral after he shouted “I object” during the service. The 77-year-old who carries a walking stick, said he was ready to walk out quietly but was “treated brusquely”. During the ceremony, the Vicar General said there had been “no valid objection” to Dame Sarah being confirmed as archbishop, something Rev Williamson disputes. “It was nonsense to say that there were no objections,” he said. “I objected and I’m not into making a scene in the house of God”. Lambeth Palace told Premier that public notices are always displayed before the Confirmation of Election for any diocesan bishop at the place where the Confirmation is due to take place. On this occasion, ahead of the Archbishop of Canterbury’s Confirmation of Election, notices were displayed outside Lambeth Palace and St Paul’s Cathedral. However, Rev Williamson said it would have been impossible for people outside London to read the notices and be aware they had to raise an objection before the King signed the Confirmation papers in December. Rev Williamson said he had last week met the Vicar General of the Province of Canterbury, Timothy Briden, to document his own formal objection ahead of Sarah Mullally’s confirmation. Premier has seen the documents which outline what Rev Williamson described as “three impediments” to the elevation of Bishop Sarah to the see of Canterbury. He cited the death of Fr Alan Griffin, a priest who took his own life after being falsely accused of abuse in the Diocese of London. A coroner strongly criticised the way the case was handled. Bishop Sarah apologised “unreservedly” to Fr Alan’s family and friends. Rev Williamson also alleged that Bishop Sarah had been too slow to act on information contained in files in the case of Martin Sargeant, a Diocese of London employee. Sargeant was sentenced to five years in prison in 2022 for defrauding the London Diocesan Fund of over £5m over a decade. He had also compiled rumours about dozens of priests in the diocese, which led to the compilation of files into 42 vicars which became known as the ‘Brain Dump’. Rev Paul also disclosed to the Vicar General that he had himself been driven to contemplate suicide over what he claimed was a lack of care by Sarah Mullally when he was evicted from his clergy housing in 2024. He claims that despite Lambeth Palace contacting Bishop Sarah to inform her of his situation, her only course of action was an email three weeks later containing information about a support group. The Diocese of London had previously said his tenure in office had come to an end in 2018 when he turned 70 and he had been given additional time to stay in the rectory rent-free until 2019. He continued to remain in the rectory until his eviction. In a statement at the time, a spokesperson for the Diocese of London said: “Mr Williamson’s eviction follows the issuing of a possession order by Staines County Court. The diocese has offered pastoral and practical support to Mr Williamson over the last six years, and has done so again ahead of today, including the offer of help in finding suitable accommodation, which we are reassured to know he has secured.”

Videos of full shows – Essentials: Michael Hudson | Blackrock/Vanguard | Netanyahu at the 7/7 London Bombings | Why/how Israel Assassinated JFK & RFK | Operation Gladio | Tony on Brexit & (4th Reich) Traitors of Arnhem | Creation vs. Evolution | God vs. Lucifer | ‘Great Plan’ for 3 World Wars | Devil Worship: The Rise Of Satanism | Nuclear Armed IDF Doomsday Cult | Aanirfan | Armageddonists I have known: Nick Land (1976-8) | George Monbiot (1995-7) | Manna for the Revelation Generation: CONSPIRACY CLASSICS, longer interviews/lectures

Part Two – International news review, Accelerationist, Armageddonist reports and investigations

LBC Andrew Marr – Epstein working for the KGB! Jeffrey Epstein ‘Russian spy’ claims emerge after files reveal Putin link ‘More and more leads’ point towards Jeffrey Epstein’s sex trafficking ring being ‘co-organised by Russian intelligence services’, Poland’s Prime Minister Donald Tusk has said Jeffrey Epstein was likely a ‘Russian spy’ and worked with the Kremlin to ‘co-organise’ his sex trafficking ring, it has been claimed. Poland’s Prime Minister Donald Tusk has announced a new investigation into the links between Epstein and Moscow after Vladimir Putin’s name appeared over a thousand times in the latest release of documents by the US Department of Justice over the weekend. It includes one revealing email exchange from 2010 when Epstein sent an email offering to help someone acquire a Russian visa, writing: “I have a friend of Putin’s, should I ask him?” Epstein also discussed setting up meetings with the Russian president, and even claimed to have turned down an invitation from Putin to meet on the sidelines of a St Petersburg conference in 2013, as there wasn’t “real time and privacy”. Jeffrey Epstein mentioned his connections with a ‘friend of Putin’s’ in one email exchange(Image: DoJ) In one audio file, Epstein is heard coaching an unnamed person on how to approach Putin, advising them: “I would send a note to Putin, saying ‘I’m going to leave government on March 14th. I’m going to be in Scandinavia, or I plan to be in western, northern Europe. We should have dinner’. That’s it, no more. It has to be very short.” It is not the first time observers have drawn a connection between the paedophile financier and the Kremlin. They have pointed to the large numbers of Russian women mentioned in his emails and his apparent links to Putin’s inner circle. Announcing the new investigation by Polish authorities, Tusk said experts now believed it was “very probable” that Epstein’s activities received co-operation as part of a Kremlin “honey trap” operation, adding: “More and more leads, more and more ?information, and more and more commentary in the global press all relate to the suspicion that this unprecedented paedophilia scandal was co-organised by Russian intelligence services. “I ?don’t need to ?tell you how serious the increasingly likely possibility that Russian intelligence services co-organised this operation is for the security of the Polish state. Donald Tusk said it was ‘very probable’ that Epstein’s activities were assisted with as part of a Kremlin ‘honey trap’ operation “This can only mean that they also possess compromising materials against many leaders still ?active today.”  

A Mossad op: ‘Epstein’s Shadow: Ghislaine Maxwell’ superb 2021 documentary – Ari Ben-Menashe, ex Israeli Intelligence, says Robert Maxwell, Ghislaine, and Epstein worked for Mossad. How Jeffrey Epstein’s intelligence ties go back decades The disgraced, convicted sex offender inhabited a murky world of business, spies and arms dealers Jeffrey Epstein discussed the UAE invading Qatar, obtained intelligence on a €500bn bailout to save the Euro before it happened, and appeared to have information that Russia tipped off Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan about a failed coup d’etat in 2016. These snippets into the conversations of the disgraced paedophile, who mysteriously died in his New York City jail cell in 2019, raise new questions about his ties to intelligence agencies. Millions of newly released files do not show Epstein clocking into a Mossad, MI6, or CIA office building. But he did not need to. Current and former ambassadors, world leaders, and moguls came to him, and his Caribbean island, where he trafficked young women for sexual abuse. The reality is that Epstein floated in a world that was unreachable and more elite than that of intelligence case officers and desk analysts. If current observers trying to make sense of Epstein’s links to intelligence agencies need an example, the closest might be The Night Manager, a mini-series based on the novel by John Le Carre. The main antagonist of the show is Richard Onslow Roper – a cut-glass, arms-dealing businessman who is an asset for members of British Intelligence and global corporations, even as he is hounded by other factions of MI6. Of course, Epstein’s emails to former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barack reveal such close and continued contact with Israel that even Epstein had to implore Barack to “make clear that i dont work for mossad”. But Epstein’s murky ties to intelligence circles go back much farther. The earliest known connection Epstein had to the world of intelligence goes back to Donald Barr. This is also the weakest link. Barr was a former member of the OSS, or Office of Strategic Services, the WWII forerunner to the CIA. Barr hired Epstein, who did not have a college degree, to work as a math and physics teacher at one of New York City’s most elite schools, The Dalton School. Ironically, Barr wrote pornographic science fiction novels in his spare time. His son Bill was working for the CIA when Epstein was hired by his father. Bill worked in the Reagan and George HW Bush administrations before serving as attorney general during the first Trump administration. Epstein left the Dalton School in 1976 and took a job with the now-defunct Bear Stearns investment bank, trading options and advising wealthy clients. Epstein’s real links to figures in the world of weapons, the ultra-rich and intrigue started in full force in 1981 when he made a trip to the UK with a former girlfriend. There, Epstein met Douglas Leese, an aristocratic British arms dealer who would play a key role in introducing Epstein to Mossad agent Robert Maxwell and high-rolling Saudi Arabian arms dealer Adnan Khashoggi.

EPSTEIN AND THE UKRAINE COUP/WAR: Low Key, Double Down News, Epstein and Ghislaine a Mossad sting operation. RT – Victor Pinchuk, Ukrainian oligarch, in contact with Epstein. In Davos, a Ukrainian Billionaire Is Fighting for Kyiv’s Cause Victor Pinchuk has lobbied wealthy elites to help save his country, but his business is also on the line Victor Pinchuk likes to stay out of the limelight and hasn’t spoken to the media in years. But he’s given away a fortune advocating for Ukraine and knows Donald Trump from way back. That makes him the right conduit for Kyiv’s interests as the global elite gather in the Swiss Alps. His Ukraine House, a concrete cube along the Davos promenade, has become a fixture at the World Economic Forum and was the place to be to watch Trump get sworn in. But trying to get the rich and influential to open their wallets for his homeland has become a harder sell. The Ukraine House pavilion in Davos.Photographer: Hollie Adams/Bloomberg The Kremlin’s forces are steadily advancing on the battlefield, while Kyiv’s allies are publicly discussing whether President Volodymyr Zelenskiy should quickly accept an unfavorable peace deal just to end the fighting. Trump didn’t even mention Ukraine in his inauguration speech — something that didn’t go unnoticed in Kyiv. He’s called US aid into question and demands even greater sacrifices from Ukrainians themselves. With potential talks between Kyiv and the Kremlin the No. 1 topic at Ukraine House, Pinchuk’s role as the corporate bridge to the West has become even more critical. But he’s also got his own future to think of after seeing Russia’s destruction of his country, jeopardizing his assets. “Pinchuk was the most westernized oligarch from the very beginning,” says former Polish President Aleksander Kwasniewski, who sits on the board of his foundation. “He knows the West.” Visitors watch a livestream of the Donald Trump US Presidential inauguration ceremony at Ukraine House pavilion in Davos, on Jan. 20.Photographer: Alessandra Migliaccio/Bloomberg Ukraine’s western tilt is a cause the 64-year-old businessman has been engaged with for the past 20 years, organizing regular events that bring together international decision makers with Ukrainian politicians in an effort to knit his country into the western alliance that he has long seen as crucial to its security. Read More: Davos Crowd Flocks to Ukraine House for Trump Inauguration Bash Born in Kyiv to a family of middle-class intellectuals who later moved to the industrial city of Dnipro, Pinchuk’s wasn’t a rags-to-riches story compared with the tough, working-class upbringing that Ukraine’s richest man Rinat Akhmetov, said Kwasniewski. Ukraine’s turbulent transition from Soviet rule in the 1990s was the making of Pinchuk and other tycoons. He built his fortune shipping pipes and used the profits to acquire various assets during large-scale privatization. He developed a diverse business empire, along with a controversial reputation like many former Ukrainian oligarchs. In 2002 he married Olena, daughter of then-president Leonid Kuchma. Victor and Olena Pinchuk in 2008.Photographer: Luc Castel/Getty Images In 2004, while his father-in-law was in office, Pinchuk bought the country’s largest steel mill in the city of Kryvyi Rih in tandem with Akhmetov. After Kuchma left as president the following year, the new government seized the mill and resold it to Lakshmi Mittal for about six times the price Pinchuk and Akhmetov had paid. It was around that time that Pinchuk started to develop his role as a bridge-builder, convening regular high-level gatherings. In 2004, he founded the Yalta European Strategy, or YES, bringing together Ukrainian and international decision-makers and celebrities in support of the country’s western integration. Last year, Trump addressed the event by video conference. “Pinchuk has the infrastructure and experience,” said Serhiy Leshchenko, a former investigative journalist who is now an advisor in Ukraine’s presidential office. “The state has the need.” It’s a project that has afforded Ukraine a lot of high-level connections, says Leshchenko, who attended many of Pinchuk’s events in his previous career as a journalist. And it immersed Pinchuk himself in a complex world of at times shifting loyalties and interests.

ReallyGraceful – Epstein represented the Rothschilds. Jeffrey Epstein’s business ties with banker Ariane de Rothschild revealed The latest release of the Epstein files by the US Department of Justice has confirmed the extremely close relationship between the French-German head of the Edmond de Rothschild group and the convicted sex offender. From 2013 until his death in 2019, he acted as an unofficial adviser to the Switzerland-based bank. “Can you believe this b-s****!!!” On September 16, 2015, Ariane de Rothschild expressed her annoyance to Jeffrey Epstein in an English-language email that reflected the informal relationship between the two correspondents. To her American friend, the French-German head of the Swiss banking group Edmond de Rothschild forwarded a message from Jacob Rothschild of the British branch of the financial dynasty. Epstein asked her to call him, stepping in as a mediator in the conflict that then pitted Ariane de Rothschild, in Geneva, against a rival and another family member, David de Rothschild, based in Paris. David, at the head of his investment bank in France, and Ariane, who became the all-powerful leader of the Edmond de Rothschild Group in Switzerland in January 2015 thanks to the support of her husband, Benjamin (who died in 2021), were at war with each other. David provoked Ariane’s anger when he renamed his firm, Paris Orléans, as Rothschild & Co and began presenting himself as the “Rothschild Group.” She saw this as a usurpation of the prestigious family name, which could damage her standing with investors and wealthy clients. This battle over the name only ended in 2018, when the two parties reached an agreement on how it could be used. In September 2015, tensions between the “cousins” reached their peak, and Ariane de Rothschild provided Epstein with near real-time written updates on this otherwise confidential battle. In return, the businessman offered his advice. “I would give david an alternative (…), ex , D , rothschhild and sons.? .. d rothschild and co. . DE rothschild.?” he wrote on September 18, 2015. Taken from the so-called Epstein files – millions of legal documents released by the US Department of Justice – these exchanges shed light on the extremely close relationship that existed between Ariane de Rothschild, who holds the title of baroness and whose personal fortune is estimated at €5.3 billion by the French business magazine Challenges, and Epstein. Between one of the most powerful figures in European private banking and the New York financier, the relationship, both friendly and professional, lasted from 2013 to 2019, ending only with Epstein’s arrest in the United States on numerous sex crime charges. Epstein died in prison in August 2019. Ariane ‘talks about you every day’ First revealed by The Wall Street Journal in 2023, their connection was initially downplayed by de Rothschild. The latest set of the Epstein files, published on January 30 by US authorities, has shattered that version of events. Hundreds of emails show that Epstein was a close friend of the 60-year-old banker and acted as her unofficial business adviser. Since their release, these documents have fueled the most absurd conspiracy theories and countless antisemitic posts on social media. None of the material reviewed by Le Monde implicates de Rothschild in Epstein’s sexual crimes.

The Deep Dive Perspective, Moseen Abbas, interviews London Neteuri Karta Rabbis on Iran riots. Times of Israel – Netanyahu on downfall of Iranian regime as part of Gaza peace plan. Rabbis’ BOMBSHELL Message to Trump: DON’T Start the Zionist Iran War! Deep Dive Perspective Rabbi Beck: A leading voice from the Neturei Karta, an international anti-Zionist Jewish movement. Rabbi Sofer: A scholar and researcher on Judaism, Zionism, and geopolitics. This is the BOMBSHELL message that Donald Trump needs to hear. Two anti-Zionist Rabbis issue an urgent plea to the US President: DON’T let the Zionist lobby drag you into a catastrophic Iran War! This is a deep dive into the religious and geopolitical forces pushing the world to the brink. Two Anti-Zionist Rabbis from Neturei Karta issue an urgent plea to Donald Trump: Do not let the Zionist lobby drag the US into a catastrophic war on Iran. This deep dive exposes the fundamental conflict between true Torah Judaism and political Zionism. Esteemed Rabbis Beck and Sofer expose the “Greater Israel” project, a colonial, expansionist agenda that has nothing to do with authentic Judaism. They reveal how powerful Zionist billionaires like the Adelson family buy influence in Washington, manipulating US foreign policy to serve Zionism, not America. They argue that a war with Iran would be a disaster for everyone, including the Jewish people, who will be blamed for the actions of a “prime terrorist minister.” This is a powerful counter-narrative from authentic Jewish voices, providing a perspective on Iran, Trump, and Zionism that you will never see on the mainstream media. This BOMBSHELL message from these brave Rabbis is a desperate plea for peace before it’s too late. The world is watching to see if Trump will listen.

MP3 of Friday 30th January 2026 show [right click to download] (from c. 11pm) This week’s full interview mp3s, bottom of page. SHOW STARTS 17:00 London time FOR c. 3½ HRS TO c. 20:30 – OUR LIVE STREAM to Listen live online. Alt. live stream, DJ Plug Radio OR Download Show After Transmission HERE. Repeats 11 & 5 AM & PM daily on our stream
Download NOT THE BCFM POLITICS SHOW APP [ANDROID APP (1)] Alternatives [GITHUB (2)] and [APKPURE (3)] – or the [Apple App store] – PS. You can replace evil Google Play, which banned us, with [the Aurora store]
Only 31% trust the UK Press! – UK media oligopoly TONY’S BOOKS: Bilderberg.org – 2 PAPER–BACKS – TONY’S CHANNELS: Telegram – Bitchute – 911 forum – Radio4All – The Land Is Ours – VK – Twitter/X – Farcebook – Brighteon – Rumble – RT Live on Rumble –  Goebbelsesque YouTube: This show; Public Enquiry; Peter Borenius; i-Contact & Occult Geopolitics

Radio4All mp3 audio files usually available from 23:00 2-4hrs, after TX – we’ll credit you if you rebroadcast. Any probs. mp3s should be on alternative links below by then

Part One – Local and National News Review

Church of England DEISM and APOSTASY 1: New Archbishop of Canterbury is heckled at installation, the first ever woman, Sarah Mulhally. Bishop Ceirion Dewar explains why this is a grave error. Is matriarchy an antichristian heresy designed to undermine both family and church? From Abraham in the Middle Bronze Age to Jesus in First Century Judea, spiritual leaders were always specifically male in traditional Biblical teaching. Since the role frequently demands church leaders face down potentially deadly challenges from anti God forces within secular society, the gentle, childbearing sex are inappropriate. Man is the first creation in God’s image. Though no less a child of God the woman’s role is primarily to procreate, something of an afterthought. The move to place women as leaders of the church in the CoE is anti-Biblical a secular (ie an apostasy) legal opinion from ‘Caesar’. Render to Caesar what is Caesar’s, and to God what is God’s’. Just as in standing armies there is good reason why Jesus placed men, not women, in the lead and at the front line. The context is that the New Testament also makes it perfectly clear that at the End of the World an apostate, devil-inspired, church leadership will turn away from Christ and reject his teachings. The structure of 1 Timothy 2:11–14 makes the reason why women cannot be pastors perfectly clear. Verse 13 begins with “for,” giving the “cause” of Paul’s statement in verses 11–12. Why should women not teach or have authority over men? Because “Adam was created first, then Eve. And Adam was not the one deceived; it was the woman who was deceived” (verses 13–14). God created Adam first and then created Eve to be a “helper” for Adam. The order of creation has universal application in the family (Ephesians 5:22–33) and in the church. The structure of 1 Timothy 2:11–14 makes the reason why women can not be pastors perfectly clear. Verse 13 begins with “for,” giving the “cause” of Paul’s statement in verses 11–12. Why should women not teach or have authority over men? Because “Adam was created first, then Eve. And Adam was not the one deceived; it was the woman who was deceived” (verses 13–14). God created Adam first and then created Eve to be a “helper” for Adam. The order of creation has universal application in the family (Ephesians 5:22–33) and in the church. In 2nd Timothy 4:3-4 we read: “For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine, but according to their own desires, because they have itching ears, they will heap up for themselves teachers; and they will turn their ears away from the truth, and be turned aside to fables.

‘Church of England DEISM and APOSTASY 2: The lady who ran a local parish emptied it. The arch deacon himself told me she left eight people. Rev Paul Williamson 2015 thinks wrong to have lady Bishops. The church was founded by our Lord Jesus Christ and God the father chose blessed Mary to be the mother of his only son. He chose the time and the place. So the argument that God would have chosen a different time and place and Jesus who chose 12 men called apostles who chose man male bishops and they chose priests who were men would have been choosing the women today is totally wrong. Well we’re talking about first century Judah then aren’t we? It’s a very different society to the society we know today. Women’s position in that society was very different. Things had evolved. Surely the church should evolve like that. Well, as John Betterman said, how odd of God to choose the Jews. But God the Father, bless him, did choose. And he chose the time and the place. He chose Mary and Bethlehem. He chose to have a son, as Paul says, born of a woman. And the Lord Jesus Christ made a very deliberate choice of those who were to carry on his work. We cannot turn around and say 50,000 years later when things have changed dramatically again that it is wrong. Well, we heard uh Libby Lane there speaking out and saying that she hopes she inspires other women. I mean surely this move, her promotion makes the church more accessible and that can only be good news in terms of increasing congregations up and down the country. I have to differ largely on this one. Um, my experience locally is that the lady who ran a parish emptied it. The arch deacon himself told me she left eight people. She went to another church and emptied it in 15 months. I’m assured Libby is wonderful. I do not wish her ill in any shape or form. But there’s a little clue in what she said. She hopes to inspire women. A bishop is supposed to inspire everybody, men, women, and children. It was very telling that the servers were all female, that there was much parading around outside the minster and comment. So, you don’t think in a very male-dominated church there should be someone who does appeal to the female congregation? I don’t think the church is male-dominated. It is a mantra that people have used until they’ve convinced themselves. I was a convent chaplain to some wonderful Church of England nuns. I have with me today here in the studio. The lady who was my church warden for many years who was a wonderful support who visited. But you think her place should only be supporting?

Church of England DEISM and APOSTASY 3: London priest evicted on grounds of age after six-year legal battle – by Simon Walsh 10 July 2024 ‘He has remained in the rectory … until now’ says diocese The Revd Paul Williamson unscrews the crucifix from the front door of the house, on Tuesday morning A PRIEST in the diocese of London has been evicted from the vicarage that he occupied for six years after he was deemed to be retired. The Revd Paul Williamson was the Priest-in-Charge of St George’s, Hanworth, from 1992 until he reached retirement age in 2018. He consistently disputed the established policy, and mounted several legal challenges in an attempt to stay in post. None was successful, and he remained in the diocesan property in Middlesex until this week, when a court eviction notice, dated 17 July, stated that he would be removed if not out by 9 June. On leaving the property, Fr Williamson addressed the bailiffs along with a group of friends, former colleagues, and parishioners. He unscrewed a crucifix from the front door, and said that he would be sending a spare key to the King as Supreme Governor of the Church of England. “You can be an MP, a member of the House of Lords, made a king, be a musician, an actor, or a TV presenter over the age of 70, but not a priest in office in a parish in the Church of England. Our late dear Queen was in office and active until age 96. The apostles did not retire from their office.” Speaking to the Church Times afterwards, Fr Williamson said that he had “felt suicidal through the threat of eviction, and have maintained all along that this matter is about age discrimination. My common tenure does not have retirement at the age of 70, and I have been fighting that. “I’m staying at the youth-club headquarters near the rectory, supported by friends and surrounded by boxes and bags. I have left the property relatively clear, but now want to take the case to the Supreme Court. Lady Hale said there is no exemption to discrimination that is not overturned by human rights.” Two years ago, his appeal to the Employment Appeal Tribunal, based on alleged age discrimination, was dismissed by its President, Mrs Justice Eady, and he was described as a “vexatious litigant” going back to a Civil Proceedings Order made against him in 1997 (News, 23 August 2022). He has also continually said that he no longer has any money for further legal fees. A spokesperson for the diocese of London said: “The Revd Paul Williamson’s tenure in office came to an end in 2018 when he turned 70. His licence was extended for a six-month period, to 28 April 2019, and he was given additional time to stay in the rectory until July 2019. He has remained in the rectory rent-free until now, requiring the diocese to provide alternative accommodation for clergy ministering in the parish. “Mr Williamson’s eviction follows the issuing of a possession order by Staines County Court. The diocese has offered pastoral and practical support to Mr Williamson over the last six years, and has done so again ahead of today, including the offer of help in finding suitable accommodation, which we are reassured to know he has secured.”

Iran attack would raise the world oil price making Venezuelan oil more viable: Adil Raja, of Soldier Speaks, on how his house was broken in to and attacked three times since Christmas – Police charged 4 Irish, British men but Adil wanders who paid them. It requires hundreds of billions of dollar investment and of course it is going to generate a lot of job for the Americans. But at the present rate of the oil, the present price of the oil, it is not feasible investment. So if straight of Hormes where right now USS Abraham Lincoln is and where the carrier strike group is and calling it an Armada, Armada lost the English and it sank. But I don’t know why he’s saying that. But because of the US military presence presence in state of Hormuz and if the state of Hormuz is blocked so the oil prices will skyrocket to a place where investment of hundred of billions of dollar in Venezuela would be feasible but it has to stay there for quite some time. So we’re looking at what a global meltdown maybe then it is killing the two birds with one stone for President Trump. Firstly, it is the it solves the issue of the hundreds of billions of dollars of investment in Venezuelan oil infrastructure. Secondly, Chinese are getting their oil supply 40 to 50% of it. They’re getting it from Venezuela got cancelled. Americans are in charge over there and the rest is coming mostly is coming for the economy is coming from Middle East. So if straight of Hormuz is blocked, it means the Chinese oil supply is blocked. So it the only outlet would be Russia of course and they’re getting dirt cheap oil from there but obviously that can be attacked that route can be attacked that’s that’s a singular target which needs to be attacked by the Ukrainians of course by giving them precision emination to attack those supply lines. So obviously it works uh uh it works for President Trump and it does make a lot of sense that he achieves an element of surprise and he goes for Iran uh no matter the end goal over here but the definitely the oil prices will rise and it’s going to work for the US. Yeah. So the Spanish Armada didn’t do too well. Um it many people talk about the old-fashioned um battleships, aircraft carriers as an old type of military force. Obviously soldiers on the ground. There’s no substitute for them apart from maybe uh Elon Musk’s androids. But uh these are apparently I mean maybe you can help me out here because I I’ve heard that these ships are actually quite easy to sink. So the Spanish Armada was sunk. Do you think the um American Armada might be sunk too? Well, once you’re terming it an Armada, that that that is a very telling thing. I don’t I don’t think President Trump is very up to date on his history. That was a mistake to call it an armada. Or maybe he’s trying to create the media circus. He loves that. He’s been in media throughout his life. So he knows how to manipulate that. Maybe that’s that’s the point. But talking purely from a military point of view with myself as a former military officer, uh what I would say is that looking at the uh sheer uh the if you look at straight of Hermes, it’s a very narrow passageway and the most important passageway or the most important energy corridor for the world. If it is blocked no matter with by Iranian action or the US action it is going to have an impact first. Secondly coming to your question well the Iranians have said that we’ve got supersonic missiles and they have proved it once they attacked Israel and Tel Aviv recently and they have been able to hit Tel Aviv irrespective of the Iron Dome the much famed uh much boosted about Iron Dome air defense system. uh Americans are I’m sure are not taking it lightly. They’ve got a concentration of uh uh forces and recently we have seen the kind of military activity we have seen in the Middle East and we have seen American air assets in the record numbers uh moving to the their bases in Qatar in in Bahrain and in the straight of Hormes and it reminds of us of the military buildup. In fact, it is much bigger buildup than the buildup we had seen in Venezuela. And for the first time, now this is very interesting. From where is this carrier strike group coming from the USS Abraham Lincoln? It is coming from the South China Sea. Now that is first development. Second, Pentagon out of the blue maybe for deception purposes which is a military uh stra which is a military trade craft I would say. uh they said that China is not our priority target no more our priority target that’s the what’s the Pentagon said right so maybe there’s an understanding if not an understanding they want to give an impression to the Chinese because the Chinese don’t want to open a front they want to concentrate on their economic development and their model of uh I won’t say imperialism but influence in this great power rivalry is much different from the US uh model of pure aggression and use of military force

Sky News – Helen-Ann Smith reports from China on the rise of protests mainly due to cost of living crisis. Voicing dissent in China is risky but it’s rising dramatically Data shows protests in China – the vast majority linked to economic grievances – have risen dramatically over the last year. Figures from China Dissent Monitor show a considerable rise in incidents of dissent, despite the fact a lack of political freedom in China makes such actions risky. China Dissent Monitor belongs to Freedom House, a non-profit organisation which has been sanctioned by China. Sky’s Asia Correspondent Helen-Ann Smith travelled to a protest in Shenzhen, in Guangdong province. Frightening ordeal as Sky News team forced into cars and camera seized – with dissent in China rising dramatically Protests are difficult to document and often quickly shut down, but data suggests incidents are rising, and the majority are due to economic grievances. Helen-Ann Smith Asia correspondent @HelenAnnSmith0 Why dissent in China is on the rise In an industrial corner of the city of Shenzhen, there was a sense the system was bracing. As they gathered, we watched them from afar. Hundreds of factory workers, clad in matching blue overall uniforms, out together on strike. It’s immediately obvious that a scene like this is sensitive in China. Dozens of police and other security workers encircled the protesters. There is a nervous atmosphere, and anyone close was told not to film…. They claim that large portions of the factory’s capacity have been shifted abroad, leaving them with a reduction in their hours, and take-home pay that no longer covers their basic costs in an expensive city like Shenzhen. A worker at the Yi Li Sheng factory cries, saying it’s impossible to live off her low wages Image: A worker at the Yi Li Sheng factory cries, saying it’s impossible to live off her low wages “Last month my wages were only 1900RMB (£200),” one woman told us, wiping tears from her eyes. “It’s impossible! How can you survive in Shenzhen on that wage! “The factory’s exploitation is unbearable. It’s very difficult.” We put these claims to Yi Li Sheng but we did not get a response. Capturing scenes like this is rare in China. Protest is often swiftly shut down, local media will rarely report it and evidence will be scrubbed from social media by an army of censors. Expressing dissent is sensitive and risky, doing so is usually a sign of how desperate people see their situation to be. Indeed, that was the sense from the workers in Shenzhen and it was clear they did want to be heard. When we got close to their group and they realised we were foreign media, they started cheering, chanting and pumping their fists. But the reaction from authorities came swiftly. Hands immediately blocked our lenses, men pulled members of our team to the side, our camera was seized and we were forced into cars and driven away. We were physically unharmed but, in the moment, the treatment was frightening. A sign, it seems, of just how much this country does not want its dissent to be seen. Just because protest is hard to document in China, it does not mean it’s uncommon. In fact, according to data collected and analysed by research group China Dissent Monitor (CDM), quite the opposite is true. The group, which is an arm of US-based NGO Freedom House, documented over 5,000 cases in 2025 and says that incidents have dramatically increased. Indeed, exclusive analysis for Sky News shows that the numbers for the first 11 months of last year were up by 48% on the same period in 2024.

Jacqui Deevoy, author of ‘Murdered by The State’, on how her Dad was in a care home during Covid years, and he died in hospital under suspicious circumstances. Murdered By The State Hardcover (2026) by Jacqui Deevoy “Jacqui Deevoy was on this story from the start and refused to let go even when the mainstream media ignored this national scandal. MURDERED BY THE STATE is both a testament to her unwavering tenacity to see justice prevail and confirmation of the evil perpetrated by those who seek to control us.” David Icke, author & public speaker “Heart breaking. How the NHS turned from caring to heartless killing of the elderly. Please read this book and let’s stop it now!” Dr. Patrick Pullicino, retired neurologist & Catholic priest “MURDERED BY THE STATE lays bare the cull – a cull I’ve witnessed with my own eyes. This is brave journalism that will awaken the world.” John O’Looney, funeral director. “This book uncovers murder hidden in plain sight – essential reading that will save lives.” Matt Le Tissier, footballer & media personality “A horrifying masterful 20:20 vision of the cruelty and inhumanity of the Government that orchestrated and the medics who administered the greatest crime in all of human history.” Dr. Gerard Waters, GP, suspended due to conscientious objection “This isn’t end-of-life care – it’s state execution. This book rips the mask off the death machine. Essential reading.” Jennifer Arcuri, political commentator “Just reading the contents page is emotional enough for those with a sensitive soul. These stories are harrowing but an honest reminder of what really went on during the covid scamdemic. Jacqui is an amazing journalist who gets to the heart of ordinary people’s stories that the media do not want anyone to hear. Bravo!” Darren Smith, editor of The Light A silent genocide is happening in UK hospitals, hospices and care homes. For decades, thousands of vulnerable souls have been secretly euthanised with ‘end of life’ pathways and killer cocktails of drugs without consent, without transparency, without justice. In 2020, under ‘death protocol’ NG163, the blatant culling was ramped up. Since then, investigative journalist Jacqui Deevoy has focused on exposing this scandal while the mainstream media buried it. In this book, 42 devastated relatives of victims reveal – in their own words – the truth about involuntary euthanasia. MURDERED BY THE STATE 42 Deaths – Zero Accountability. This is not a conspiracy – it’s a crime. It’s democide and it must be stopped.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney gives ‘Middle Powers’ speech at WEF in Davos. Stuck in the middle Call it The Carney Paradox: In an era of predatory great powers, the benefits of global economic integration must be balanced with protecting national autonomy Canada doesn’t have to trade with other countries. We trade because we benefit from the exchange. We gain from exports and imports. But in a world where “great powers” are “using economic integration as weapons,” as Prime Minister Mark Carney put it this week at the World Economic Forum, there’s a danger for middle powers such as Canada that “integration becomes the source of your subordination.” Carney, Trump and the week at Davos that marked the decline of the West Economists are almost always in favour of greater openness to trade, because of the obvious upsides. It tends to increase economic efficiency and raise living standards in a smaller economy like Canada’s. But Mr. Carney pointed out that in the current environment, greater global economic integration can bring downsides, and even existential dangers, for smaller countries. The great powers – he was careful not to name the United States, and even more careful not to name China – are threatening to weaponize the benefits of economic integration for smaller states to undermine their sovereignty. Call it the Carney Paradox. More integration may bring economic benefits, but it could threaten national security. However, preserving national autonomy by foregoing integration will come with economic costs. The paradox was on display this week as U.S. President Donald Trump threatened to slap escalating tariffs on several European countries unless they agreed to a U.S. takeover of Greenland. He backed down, but what he initially demanded, in return for trade access and the preservation of the NATO alliance, was an outright surrender of sovereignty. What to do? Prime Minister Carney was careful not to name the U.S. in his Davos speech, in which he warned of ‘great powers’ using economic integration as weapons.FABRICE COFFRINI/AFP/Getty Images Mr. Carney’s speech, calling for an acknowledgment of these new realities, was rhetorically soaring, widely quoted and almost universally praised, at least outside the White House. He had many memorable turns of phrase, with words that were persuasive because they ring true. But: The speech was also scarce on details of exactly what Ottawa will do, and how it will do it. One possible response is to build what Mr. Carney called “a world of fortresses.” To address the threat to our security from too much integration with one or more threatening hegemons, we could pre-emptively de-integrate. We could throw up trade walls of our own. That’s what Canada did in the decades after Confederation. Fearful that too much economic integration with the U.S. would lead to political absorption, the new country’s first prime minister, Sir John A. Macdonald, implemented the National Policy in 1879. Its centrepiece was high tariffs to protect Canadian industry against competition from imports. Could Canada pursue something similar today? Yes. Should we? Let’s do a thought experiment. To make it clear, let’s make it extreme. Imagine what it would be like if Canada did not trade with the rest of the world. Instead of the more than $170-billion dollars in merchandise and service imports and exports recorded last October, let’s say that figure was zero. No imports, no exports. Imagine if everything we have and everything we consume – every piece of clothing, every morsel of food, every vehicle on the road, and everything in our workplaces and our homes, from TV screens and smartphones down to the paint and the nails – had to be stamped “Made in Canada.”

Adrian Salbuchi – runaway inflation in Argentina in 2001 – 4th Reich after WW2 as told by friend Wilfred von Offen who was private secretary to top Nazi Josef Goebbels.  The Fed to Expand its Balance Sheet to more than $10 Trillion, As The Economy, The Markets, and The Americans become Addicted to Stimulus. What a gigantic everything bubble freak of nature we have created. It is going to be a massacre soon in everything. Then the suffering and death come for many. Dark times are coming; I can see the blackest of clouds moving in on the horizon. A vertical stock market in a depression where 800,000+ people file jobless claims every WEEK for seven months straight. Our dystopian overlords have deemed it necessary to create an insulting illusion with a cartoonishly fake stock market that is priced as if there was heaven on Earth. The Fed unveils plan to expand its balance sheet but still insists it’s Not QE. “We’re going to go in strong,” declared Fed Chairman Jerome Powell. The Federal Reserve said Friday that it would begin buying government-backed securities to expand its balance sheet, a move meant to keep an obscure but critical corner of financial markets functioning smoothly. The Federal Reserve’s balance sheet is exploding, growing by about $3 trillion since mid-March and now totaling more than $7 trillion. It could conceivably exceed $10 trillion by yearend, as the central bank buys corporate bonds, municipal securities and makes loans to medium-sized businesses while purchasing $80 billion of Treasuries and $40 billion of agency mortgage-backed securities (MBS) each month. This would be more than double the peak that the Fed’s balance sheet reached after the 2008-09 financial crisis. By stimulus, all they mean is a couple trillion for the fat cats whose portfolios are already up 35% since the pandemic. Maybe a couple billion to be spread out to the peasants. We thought 2009 was the biggest rip off in history. This farce is ten times bigger, and the poor get poorer. For Bankers on Wall Street, Politicians, and government employees, it was not bad. For your hard-working Americans in the private sector, it was disastrous. For example, Yelp reports that at least 55% of the restaurant listed on Yelp will not re-open….ever. That’s nationwide. In some areas like New York City, it’s much higher. So while the Fat Wall Street CEOs and execs got Fat Fed’s handouts, many others have gone bankrupt. I won’t even get into the human suffering that occurred because people could not get to their doctor or dentist, etc. So what’s the bottom line of the Fed’s rapid balance sheet expansion? A massive redistribution of wealth to the 1% from the 80%. Welfare for the Wealthy. Preserving Privately held Profits absent any assumed risk while Socializing all losses and denying a safety net to those most severely impacted because you can’t keep the poor and working-class people poor.If you actually gave them money … and basic moral and economic and tenets of conservatism and deregulated. The balance sheet is going way, way past 10 Trillion. And we can pray for inflation, but our prayers won’t be answered. But this shouldn’t surprise us. The financial sector’s very survival depends on a deep commitment to the illusion of a recovery. How can we get a recovery in the teeth of a raging pandemic and massive unemployment! Welcome back to The Atlantis Report. You are here for your daily dose of the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. Please take a second to click the like button. Many of you have asked me where they can buy silver and gold bullion.You will find in the description box links where you can buy American Silver Eagle 0.999 Fine Silver; Or Fine Silver Bars or Rounds. I highly recommend that you start stacking some Silver Bullion for the future. All of this is crazy. They keep creating problems and then come to the rescue to fix the problem—only to create a bigger problem down the road. It all sounds so simple and wonderful. How come Japan wasn’t able to pull it off? There is already inflationin the markets. What would you call Amazon at 118 times earnings and 1.5 Trillion market cap! Microsoft at 32 times earnings! Apple, not that long ago, had a PE of 12. Now 29! I call that inflation. And what happens to yields and corporate income statements when the Fed funds rate starts rising? Right. There is no such thing as a free lunch. Sitting on yield is going to leave them with the choice of inflation or a wave of bankruptcies. And what about inflation from the declining confidence in the US dollar, brought about by virtually unlimited spending? Dollar falls, import prices rise. 

Argentina In Revolt: Buenos Aires 2001-2002 and the IMF Riots – English subtitles Indymedia documentary ……..To reduce its deficit per IMF decree, Argentina had cut $3 billion from government spending-a cut that was necessary, the authors note here, to “accomodate the increase in interest obligations.” These obligations, the report did not need to add, were largely to foreign creditors, including the IMF and World Bank themselves. Since 1994, in fact, Argentina’s budget deficits had been entirely attributable to interest payments on foreign loans. Excluding such payments, spending had remained constant at 19 percent of GDP. Despite the visible harm caused by cuts, the new plan ordered more. This, the report promised, would “greatly improve the outlook for the remainder of 2001 and 2002, with growth expected to recover in the later half of 2001.” The Bank was slightly off the mark. By December 2001, Buenos Aires’ middle class, unaccustomed to hunting the streets for garbage to eat, joined the poor in mass demonstrations. How had Argentina arrived at such an impasse? In the 1990s the nation was the poster child for globalization, having followed without question the IMF and World Bank program. The “reform” plan for Argentina, as for every nation, has four steps. The first of these, capital market liberalization, was achieved by 1991’s “Convertibility Plan,” which pegged the Argentine peso in a one-to-one relationship with the U.S. dollar. This peg was designed both to keep inflation low and to make deficit spending difficult, in hopes of attracting and comforting foreign investors. Liberalized markets free capital to flow in and out across borders. But once Argentina’s economy began to wobble, money simply flowed out… The second step in the IMF/World Bank regimen is privatization. Both at the urging of lenders and out of financial necessity, Argentina throughout the nineties sold off what Argentines now ruefully call “las joyas de mi abuela,” grandmother’s jewels: the state’s oil, gas, water, and electric companies and the state banks. It was quite a fire sale. Vivendi of France won rural water systems; Enron of Texas the pipes of Buenos Aires; Fleet of Boston took the provincial banks……….

Dan Dicks on the elite from Canada – Press for Truth.ca.  The Seven Richest Billionaires Are All Media Barons – mintpressnews – Trump loyalist and CIA contractor Larry Ellison’s purchase of CNN appears imminent, and marks the latest venture into media for the world’s second-richest individual. But Ellison is not alone. Indeed, the world’s seven richest individuals are all now powerful media barons, controlling what the world sees, reads, and hears, marking a new chapter in oligarchical control over society and striking another blow at a free, independent press and diversity of opinion. Media Monopoly: Paramount Skydance– an Ellison-owned company– is in pole position to purchase Warner Brothers Discovery, a conglomerate that controls gigantic film and television studios, streaming services like HBO Max and Discovery+, franchises like DC Comics, and TV networks such as HBO, TNT, Discovery Channel, TLC, Food Network, and CNN. This lead is largely due to Ellison’s proximity to President Trump, who will ultimately have to sign off on such a deal. Ellison has already spoken to senior White House officials about axing CNN hosts and content that Trump is said to dislike, including anchors, Erin Burnett and Brianna Keilar. It is this willingness to completely reorientate the network’s political direction that has made him the White House’s preferred purchaser of Warner Brothers Discovery. He is reportedly so wealthy that he can afford to pay in cash. Ellison, whose net worth stands at a staggering $278 billion, has been on a media spending spree of late. Earlier this year, he provided the funds for Skydance to purchase Paramount Global, another gigantic conglomerate that controls such products as CBS, BET, MTV, Comedy Central, Nickelodeon, Paramount Streaming, and Showtime. Immediately upon being appointed CEO of CBS News, Larry’s son, David, began drastically reorientating the network’s political outlook, firing staff, pushing it to become pro-Trump, and appointing self-described “Zionist fanatic” Bari Weiss as its editor-in-chief. The Ellison family, however, is far from finished. In September, President Trump signed an executive order approving a proposal to force through the sale of social media platform TikTok to an American consortium led by Ellison-owned tech company, Oracle. Under the planned arrangement, Oracle will oversee the platform’s security and operations, giving the world’s second-richest man effective control over the platform that more than 60% of Americans under thirty years of age use for news and entertainment. Trump himself stated that he was extremely pleased that Oracle would be controlling the platform. “It’s owned by Americans, and very sophisticated Americans,”

Videos of full shows – Essentials: Michael Hudson | Blackrock/Vanguard | Netanyahu at the 7/7 London Bombings | Why/how Israel Assassinated JFK & RFK | Operation Gladio | Tony on Brexit & (4th Reich) Traitors of Arnhem | Creation vs. Evolution | God vs. Lucifer | ‘Great Plan’ for 3 World Wars | Devil Worship: The Rise Of Satanism | Nuclear Armed IDF Doomsday Cult | Aanirfan | Armageddonists I have known: Nick Land (1976-8) | George Monbiot (1995-7) | Manna for the Revelation Generation: CONSPIRACY CLASSICS, longer interviews/lectures

Part Two – International news review, Accelerationist, Armageddonist reports and investigations

Adil Raja, Soldier Speaks, Trump sends Carrier Strike Group to Iran. Martin Summers – Trump’s armada to Iran, Trump and insider trading, US mafia and US government, China trade deals and Embassy, Russia/Ukraine war, Starmer cancelling election – Andy Burnham, Reform, technocracy, Iran protests, Starlink.  Champion boxer in ‘hitman-for-hire’ plot on two Pakistani dissidents living in Britain A champion boxer has been accused of orchestrating a ‘hitman-for-hire’ plot to attack two Pakistani dissidents living in Britain. Louis Regan organised the hits on Mirza Shahzad Akbar and Adil Raja early on Christmas Eve, it is claimed. He led three other men in a ‘planned and sophisticated’ plot to ambush them at their homes in Cambridge and Chesham, Buckinghamshire, it is alleged. Mr Akbar is a human rights lawyer and former Pakistani government adviser, who served in the country’s cabinet under its jailed former Prime Minister Imran Khan. Meanwhile, Mr Raja is an outspoken critic of the Pakistani government and has written about the alleged corruption of the country’s military. Regan, 25, from Birmingham, is a second-year sport and exercise science student at Canterbury Christ Church University in Kent. He was crowned National Schools boxing champion aged just 14. He went on to represent his country at the European tournament, before working as a coach at his boyhood club, the Pat Benson Boxing Academy. The athlete appeared in Westminster Magistrates’ Court on Monday, after he was charged on Saturday with two counts of conspiracy to assault occasioning bodily harm. He was remanded in custody ahead of a hearing at London’s Old Bailey on February 13. Prosecutor Warren Stanier explained: ‘When Mr Akbar confirmed he was the person, he was then assaulted, punched numerous times to the face, causing him bruising, cuts and a broken nose.’ He continued: ‘A group attended Mr Raja’s address at 8am, but Mr Raja wasn’t in.’ This came after several reconnaissance trips to the pair’s houses, the lawyer added. Regan helped run boxing programmes for local students and was involved in a half-term project in collaboration with the West Midlands Police and Crime Commissioner. He is now understood to live and work in Dubai, as a ‘qualified England boxing coach’ and ‘personal trainer’, according to his social media. The boxer will be joined at the Old Bailey next month by co-defendants Karl Blackbird, 40, Clark McAulay, 39, and Doneto Brammer, 21. All three men, who are British nationals, were charged on Friday and appeared at Westminster Magistrates’ Court on Saturday, where they were remanded in custody. Blackbird, from Bedworth, Warwickshire, has been accused of two charges of conspiracy to assault occasioning bodily harm for both attacks. McAulay, from Coventry, West Midlands, has been charged with conspiracy to assault occasioning bodily harm over the hit on Mr Raja. Brammer, from Wood Green, north London, has been accused over a second incident on New Year’s Eve of the same year, which saw an attempt to set Mr Akbar’s house on fire. Two men are believed to have attacked the property while no one was home, with one using a firearm to break a window before one tried to throw a burning rag through it. The material fell to the ground outside the property and did not cause any damage. Brammer is charged with possession of a prohibited weapon, conspiracy to commit arson with intent to endanger life, and conspiracy to commit arson being reckless as to whether life would be endangered. A man, 34, was also arrested at an address in Great Dunmow, Essex, over the incident on January 5. He has been released on bail until a date in April, pending further enquiries. Blackbird, McAulay, Brammer and two others were arrested on January 21 variously across the West Midlands, Warwickshire and London over the Christmas Eve and New Year’s Eve attacks….

Israeli activist Noiya Tsion exposes false media reports about her death in Iran protests Noiya Tsion, an Israeli activist who manages social media accounts for artists in Israel, said she was stunned to see her photo displayed on Israel’s privately owned Channel 12 as one of the alleged victims of the Iran protests. An Israeli social media activist has exposed false reports by Israeli media claiming that she was killed during anti-government protests in Iran, saying she was shocked to read news of her own death while sitting at home. Noiya Tsion, an Israeli activist who manages social media accounts for artists in Israel, said she was stunned to see her photo displayed on Israel’s privately owned Channel 12 as one of the alleged victims of the Iran protests. The channel claimed that four Iranians of Jewish origin were killed during protests over worsening economic conditions in Iran. The broadcaster said that the toll could be higher, citing difficulty to verify the figure due to an internet blackout in the country. After the report emerged, several Israeli media outlets and journalists shared the claim on social media, with some asserting that the number of Jewish fatalities in Iran had risen to five. Channel 14, an outlet close to Israel’s right-wing camp and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, reported without verification that the victims included a father, 32, wife, 29, a relative, 25 and a child, 15, who it said were killed on the streets of Tehran. The channel also claimed, without citing sources, that 36,000 protesters had been killed nationwide, a figure that it said is “extremely high by any measure.” Tsion publicly refuted the claims in a video posted on US social media company TikTok, appearing visibly shocked as she reacted to news reports announcing her death and showing her image on screen. “I’m at home. I need to go to training in half an hour,” she said. Israeli media outlets that circulated the report did not issue apologies. Channel 12, which first aired the claim, said Monday that images of alleged Jewish victims in Iran had spread widely on social media worldwide, including in Israel. In an attempt to deflect responsibility, the channel said reports had emerged a day earlier about the deaths of four Iranian Jews during the protests and that the images circulated globally. The channel added that Tsion later saw herself on television identified as one of the Iranians killed. Tsion told Channel 12 that she has no relatives or acquaintances in Iran. Her video was widely shared by Israelis, with calls on social media to take legal action against the media outlets that published the false reports. The protests erupted in Iran in late December 2025 and lasted nearly two weeks, triggered by a sharp depreciation of the local currency and a worsening economic crisis. Demonstrations began in Tehran and later spread to several cities. President Masoud Pezeshkian acknowledged public anger and pledged to work to improve conditions. In the absence of an official casualty toll, the US-based Iranian human rights agency HRANA reported that 5,459 people were killed, including dozens of security personnel. Iran’s Foundation of Martyrs and Veterans Affairs put the death toll at 3,117. The developments coincided with fears of a possible US strike against Iran. Tehran accuses Washington of seeking to escalate sanctions, pressure and unrest to pave the way for external intervention and regime change.

US KICKS IRAN: Press TV  “In the Times reporting, Silicon Valley becomes humanitarian, the Pentagon disappears, and Elon Musk is only depicted as a benevolent billionaire so long as he’s helping advance U.S. interests.” – The Art of Making Pentagon Infrastructure Look Like Iranian Activism Jeremy Loffredo The New York Times wants readers to believe that one of the most significant information warfare operations inside a U.S. adversary state is the work of a “ragtag” group of activists. To sustain this illusion, the paper relies on strategic framing, euphemism, and the systematic removal of political context. An article published on January 15th, titled “Inside the Fight to Keep Iran Online” centers around the smuggling of tens of thousands of SpaceX Starlink terminals into Iran during the nationwide internet blackout. The framing is familiar: heroic technologists improvising under pressure and outwitting an authoritarian state. What the Times doesn’t do is situate the technology or the operation within their actual political and military contexts. Starlink is not civilian infrastructure that wandered into geopolitics by accident. It is a core component of U.S. military communications architecture. SpaceX is one of the Pentagon’s most important contractors, providing launch services, satellite deployment, and orbital infrastructure to the Department of Defense, U.S. Space Force, and U.S. intelligence agencies. Starlink itself has been integrated into almost all modern military operations, most visibly in Ukraine, where it has functioned as the primary battlefield communications infrastructure for the U.S.-backed war effort. Starlink finding its way into Iran isn’t an incidental overlap. The U.S. military does not merely “partner” with SpaceX; it relies on it. SpaceX launches classified payloads, builds military satellites, and operates a privately owned entire-Earth covering global communications network that the Pentagon classifies as a “strategic asset.” Starlink is engineered to operate in contested environments: encrypted, resilient under electronic warfare, and difficult to jam. These are not features designed for casual connectivity. They are features of a weapon. Starlink is not simply used in war; it is designed for war. Its purpose is to preserve coordination when states are trying to sever command, control, and information flow. When introduced into Iran during mass unrest, Starlink is being used exactly as intended: to defeat state control over information space, maintain opposition coordination under repression, and shift the balance of power during a political crisis. The fact that the architects are described as “activists” rather than “soldiers” does not alter the function of the system. This is military-grade communications equipment deployed inside an adversary state to weaken government authority. In strategic terms, there is no meaningful distinction. Yet in the Times’ telling, the presence of tens of thousands of these terminals is framed as an act of civil society. The word “ragtag” does heavy ideological work, transforming a smuggling operation that required state coordination, sanctions exemptions, logistics corridors, and substantial capital into something resembling a grassroots improvisation. The article briefly acknowledges that the State Department coordinated with SpaceX on sanctions exemptions and advised civil society groups on how to conceal Starlink terminals from Iranian authorities. This admission is buried deep in the text, stripped of its implications. In reality, this single sentence collapses the entire “independent activism” narrative. When the State Department coordinates the deployment of encrypted military satellite infrastructure into an adversary state during mass unrest, that is not philanthropy. It’s warfare and statecraft policy. Any remaining ambiguity is dispelled by the article’s own descriptions of Iran’s response. The Iranian government is said to have deployed “military-grade electronic weaponry” to jam Starlink signals—language that implicitly acknowledges Starlink’s military character while refusing to name it as such. The Times never asks the obvious question: why would a state deploy battlefield electronic warfare tools against what is supposedly a benign activist network?

Middle East Eye – editor David Hearst – Trump’s Board of Peace fascist? ‘Board of Peace’: Trump is running Gaza, and the world, like a mafia boss David Hearst To invite the same cast of characters who allowed Israel to expand to the point at which Gaza exploded, and expect them to end the conflict, is more than just insane. It’s criminal Everyone and his dog appears to have been invited on US President Donald Trump’s “Board of Peace” . Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Egypt and Morocco and a slew of other countries have accepted, but there is as yet a marked reluctance of Western nations to join in. This has nothing to do with Gaza, but over Europe’s lingering suspicions about Trump’s policy on Greenland and Ukraine. With admission priced at $1bn, and with the suspicion they could be joining a half-baked proposal to sideline the UN, it is little wonder that they are not in a rush to join. The Board of Peace is supported by a founding executive board, which is stacked full of people who denied a genocide was and is taking place in Gaza, including US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Special Envoy Steve Witkoff, Trump’s son in law, Jared Kushner, as well as people like Mark Rowan, Wall Street financier, who intimidated US campuses into banning demonstrations in support of Palestine. They are united, too, by a profound lack of knowledge about the Middle East. The one person on the executive board who has experience of the region – if you call invading Iraq and unleashing a devastating seven-year civil war “experience” – is Britain’s very own Tony Blair. Blair, however, represents no-one but himself. The British government has been careful to make that clear by distancing itself from its former prime minister. In November when Blair’s name first popped up, Jonathan Powell, the current national security advisor and Blair’s former chief of staff in Downing Street, said privately that Blair did not represent the British state. Powell lobbied actively against Blair’s nomination, according to two separate informed sources who spoke to Middle East Eye on condition of anonymity. Powell accurately represents the view of the deep state that does not conceal its disdain for Blair’s many attempts to recapture the limelight on the international stage. A source with knowledge of the thinking inside the Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO) said: “That is entirely accurate. This isn’t even really in contention. Blair has no position within the British government. “His activities in terms of the Tony Blair Institute are as a private citizen. That’s not to say that there aren’t contacts but he really doesn’t represent the British state. I’d have been astonished if anybody had claimed otherwise…

IS TRUMPS LEAKED PLAN TO IMPRISON & ENSLAVE GAZA ALSO THE ZIONIST PLAN TO ENSLAVE THE WORLD? Trump’s Gaza Digital Prison Plan Leaked to Drop Site News, Board of Peace New Human Surveillance Lab ‘Privatised Subjugation’, Theme Park of Dispossession’ and ‘Investor’s Returns On Genocide Investment.’ The population should be based on Palestinian residents invited based on the following criteria: Priority is given to residents of the Shaboura and Rafah areas from before the war. Intact extended families are preferred to enable mutual aid and prevent friction. Essential professionals are required: teachers, medical staff, rescue personnel, community workers, merchants, administrative/municipal staff, and banking/finance professionals. All individuals will undergo security vetting to prevent the entry of weapons or Hamas elements. Residents will be able to enter and exit the neighborhood freely, subject to security checks to prevent the introduction of weapons and hostile elements. Initially, a temporary community directorate should be appointed from among the residents. Elections for a neighborhood directorate should be held in the future as the project develops. The directorate would facilitate coordination with the relevant authorities for regional services (major infrastructure) and with funding bodies for municipal services. The directorate would manage basic municipal services such as water, sanitation, electricity, etc although service payment by residents requires further discussion. All entering residents will be registered with biometric documentation to enable identification for movement and civil services. The registry will be based on Palestinian ID numbers issued by the authorities in coordination with COGAT. Residents needing to travel abroad may use their Palestinian passports. Those who have lost documents or require new ones can process them through the Palestinian Authority (PA) via a local post office branch to be opened on-site. Residents can report deaths or births occurring during the war to the PA population registry via the local post office Since the Emirati compound is intended to be on public land, an examination is required regarding potential private rights holders, including mechanisms for registration and compensation. The public use of land with private rights requires in-depth discussion with legal entities. Donor-funded projects within the community will be coordinated by a supervisory mechanism to ensure funds go directly to local projects since the PA’s Municipal Development and Lending Fund (MDLF) [mechanism cannot] be used. Economy The Israeli Shekel will remain legal tender, as it is in the rest of Gaza and the West Bank. Electronic Shekel wallets should be primary modes of commerce as they are secure and mitigate diversion of goods and funds to the Hamas financial channels. A Bank of Palestine branch in the community would provide secure and transparent commerce. Private sector shops and markets should be prioritized to promote productive economic initiatives. Efforts should be made to promote paid employment for the maximum number of residents. Employment will be based on essential professions, public services, and unskilled labor for the public good and managed through an established employment bureau. Intensive agriculture in the outskirts of the community promotes options for employment outside the neighborhood (in non-Hamas controlled areas) will be examined, prioritizing labor-intensive farming. Residents should be permitted to import products into the Gaza Strip to facilitate and encourage commerce and economic growth. Products would be subject to security restrictions and checks at crossings….

Tony Greenstein – Holocaust Memorial Day 2026 – Jewish Network for Palestine – DeNazify the Israeli State.  Holocaust Memorial Day 2026 – Record Attendance For Our Call To DENAZIFY THE ISRAELI STATE Not One Holocaust Memorial Organisation Worldwide Has Condemned the Genocide in Gaza or Said That ‘Never Again’ Applies to the Palestinians The Holocaust Memorial Day commemoration we have just held is the fourth to be organised by Jewish Network for Palestine. It also had a record attendance. 624 people registered for the meeting and 420 attended with a maximum of 357 at any one time. The meeting was chaired by Haim Bresheeth, an Israeli anti-Zionist academic and author of ‘An army like no other’. The speakers were: Ø Rania Khalek, a Lebanese-American journalist who hosts Breakthrough News. Ø Ghada Karmi, the author In Search of Fatima and many other books. Ghada is one of the original 1948 Palestinians, who and Professor of History at Exeter University and author of The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine. Ø Suzanne Weiss is a child survivor who was hidden by the Communist Resistance in France. Suzanne’s memoir, From Holocaust to Resistance – my journey is well worth getting. Ø Stephen Kapos is a child survivor of the Hungarian holocaust who was hidden by the Holy Family Church in Budapest. Stephen is a well known figure on Britain’s Palestine solidarity demonstrations who was questioned by the Metropolitan Police about a public order offence! Ø Lastly Tony Greenstein, is author of Zionism During the Holocaust and a long-standing Jewish anti-Zionist . Bruce Springsteen – Streets Of Minneapolis (Official Audio) – The Fight Against ICE is the Fight for Palestine The theme of this year’s Holocaust Memorial Day webinar was The Nazification of Israel. When I chose this title I wasn’t aware of an article by Orly Noy, in Israel’s +972 Magazine . Orly wrote: Gaza City is engulfed in flames, as the Israeli army embarks on its long-threatened ground offensive after weeks of relentless bombardment…. I urge you to watch the footage streaming out of Gaza, and see what this euphemism really means. Look into the eyes of people gripped by a terror unmatched even in the darkest moments of this two-year genocide. See the rows of ash-covered children lying on the blood-soaked floor of what was once a medical center — some barely alive, others wailing in pain and fear — as desperate hands try to comfort them or treat them with whatever medical supplies remain. Hear the screams of families fleeing with nowhere to run. Witness parents scouring the inferno for their children; limbs protruding from beneath the rubble; a paramedic cradling a motionless girl, pleading with her to open her eyes, in vain. Israel is unleashing a holocaust in Gaza, and it cannot be dismissed as the will of the country’s current fascist leaders alone. This horror runs deeper than Netanyahu, Ben Gvir, and Smotrich. What we are witnessing is the final stage in the nazification of Israeli society. The urgent task now is to bring this holocaust to an end. But stopping it is only the first step. If Israeli society is ever to return to the fold of humanity, it must undergo a deep process of denazification…. Denazification must also include the recognition that what was cannot remain. It will not be enough to simply replace the current government. We must abandon the myth of Israel’s “Jewish and democratic” character — a paradox whose iron grip helped pave the way to the catastrophe we are now immersed in. This deception must end with the clear recognition that only two paths remain: either a Jewish, messianic, genocidal state, or a truly democratic state for all its citizens. The process of deNazification must begin with the recognition that Israel does not inherit the memory of the Jews who died in the holocaust. On the contrary, Israel mirrors the Nazi racial supremacy that led to the holocaust. We must stop bowing our heads in solemn acquiescence when the Zionists invoke the memory of the 6 million as justification for the annihilation of the Palestinians. We must not repeat the slogan ‘Never Again’ without emphasising that today this slogan applies to the Palestinians above all. The Silence of the Holocaust Memorial Organisations Yad Vashem is Israel’s holocaust memorial organisation. Yad Vashem’s purpose was never to draw universal lessons from the holocaust. For Zionism the Jewish holocaust was unique and if its unique then how can one draw universal lessons applicable to all?