‘I represent the Rothschilds’ Epstein tells Peter Thiel – Rev Paul Williamson with new archbishop safeguarding concerns, ejected from St Pauls cathedral – Sam William: They are creating a DIGITAL GOD! – The Bristol Politics Show, presented by Tony Gosling

MP3 of Friday 6th February 2026 show [right click to download] (from c. 11pm) This week’s full interview mp3s, bottom of page. SHOW STARTS 17:00 London time FOR c. 3½ HRS TO c. 20:30 – OUR LIVE STREAM to Listen live online. Alt. live stream, DJ Plug Radio OR Download Show After Transmission HERE. Repeats 11 & 5 AM & PM daily on our stream
Download NOT THE BCFM POLITICS SHOW APP [ANDROID APP (1)] Alternatives [GITHUB (2)] and [APKPURE (3)] – or the [Apple App store] – PS. You can replace evil Google Play, which banned us, with [the Aurora store]
Only 31% trust the UK Press! – UK media oligopoly TONY’S BOOKS: Bilderberg.org – 2 PAPER–BACKS – TONY’S CHANNELS: Telegram – Bitchute – 911 forum – Radio4All – The Land Is Ours – VK – Twitter/X – Farcebook – Brighteon – Rumble – RT Live on Rumble –  Goebbelsesque YouTube: This show; Public Enquiry; Peter Borenius; i-Contact & Occult Geopolitics

Radio4All mp3 audio files usually available from 23:00 2-4hrs, after TX – we’ll credit you if you rebroadcast. Any probs. mp3s should be on alternative links below by then

Part One – Local and National News Review

Martin enjoyed watching a 1989 Peter Greenaway film at Tony’s flat this week: ‘The Cook, the Thief, His Wife & Her Lover’ by Peter Greenaway [watch here] (1989): Subversive Screenwriting The Cook: Art and Civilization. The Thief: Tyranny and Excess. The Wife: Rebellion and Awakening. Her Lover: Intellect and Passion [the screenplay]. In the realm of cinema, few films have managed to shock, provoke, and captivate audiences quite like Peter Greenaway’s 1989 masterpiece, ‘The Cook, the Thief, His Wife & Her Lover’. This audacious work of art stands as a testament to the power of subversive screenwriting, challenging conventional storytelling norms and pushing the boundaries of what cinema can achieve. In this article, we’ll delve into the intricate layers of Greenaway’s screenplay, exploring how it exemplifies subversive writing techniques that continue to influence filmmakers and writers today. The Art of Subversion: Defying Expectations At its core, subversive screenwriting is about defying expectations and challenging the status quo. Greenaway’s screenplay for ‘The Cook, the Thief, His Wife & Her Lover’ does this on multiple levels, from its structure to its themes and character development. Unconventional Structure Unlike traditional three-act structures, Greenaway’s screenplay unfolds in a series of tableaux, each centered around elaborate meals in a high-end restaurant. This structure mirrors the ritualistic nature of fine dining while simultaneously subverting it by juxtaposing refinement with grotesque violence and base human desires. The film’s pacing is deliberate and unhurried, allowing tension to build slowly and inexorably. This defies the conventional wisdom of maintaining a brisk pace to keep audiences engaged. Instead, Greenaway creates a sense of mounting dread and fascination that keeps viewers transfixed. Blurring Genre Lines ‘The Cook, the Thief, His Wife & Her Lover’ resists easy categorization, blending elements of drama, dark comedy, crime thriller, and even surrealism. By refusing to adhere to genre conventions, Greenaway creates a unique viewing experience that keeps the audience off-balance and engaged. This genre-defying approach allows the screenplay to explore its themes from multiple angles, creating a rich tapestry of meaning that resists simple interpretation.

Epstein files released – but really nasty stuff not released – meaning there is really nasty stuff! Palestine Action activists cleared of aggravated charges after break-in at Israeli defence firm – no verdict. THE FILTON TRIAL – THE VERDICTS – NO CONVICTIONS – FIVE BAILED Verdicts delivered on the six young people who have spent seventeen months on remand and eight weeks in court Six members of Palestine Action took part in a direct action against the Filton R&D facility of Elbit Systems in August 2024. (This action took place a whole year before Yvette Cooper’s controversial proscription of the organisation – the decision that a Judicial Review is likely to hand down its ruling on, in the coming days.) The six young people have been in prison on remand for 17 months and their trial began on November 17th 2025 at Woolwich Crown Court in front of Mr Justice Johnson. The defendants are Charlotte Head, Samuel Corner, Leona Kamio, Fatema Zainab Rajwani, Zoe Rogers and Jordan Devlin. All six are charged jointly on three counts: Aggravated burglary (Section 10 of Theft Act 1968) Criminal damage (Section 1 of Criminal Damage Act 1971) Violent disorder (Section 2 of Public Order Act 1986) As well as the three counts listed above, Samuel Corner faces an additional charge under Section 18 of the Offences Against The Person Act 1861, of causing grievous bodily harm with intent.The jury have options in his case of finding him guilty of lesser offences – these could be Grievous Bodily Harm, Actual Bodily Harm With Intent, or Actual Bodily Harm. All defendants have pled not guilty. The jury began deliberating on Tuesday 13th January, but illness and other factors mean that several days have been lost along the way, and it’s taken around 8 full days to reach this point.

With Mandelson’s blessing, Starmer set up his own Labour leadership team six months before Corbyn’s 2019 defeat… The Arlington Road Gang (Left to Right) – Downing Street Chief of Staff, Morgan McSweeney – Prime Minister Kier Starmer – Nick Smith, MP for Blaenau Gwent and Rhymney, with his wife, – Baroness Jenny Chapman, ex-MP – Baron Andrew Adonis of Camden, ex-minister – Georgia Gould, MP for Queen’s Park and Maida Vale – Tulip Siddiq, MP for Hampstead and Highgate Thanks to Wolfgang Airvent Brabinger for the names and pic.. – Jeremy Corbyn on Katie Halper Show – disaster is coming – Jeremy Corbyn’s warning. Labour Arlington Road group took a secret £700,000 from Israeli donors to help destroy Corbyn and elect Starmer as Labour leader. Morgan McSweeney: the man running Britain and his ties to Israel.  Starmer set up own Labour leadership team six months before Corbyn’s 2019 defeat A new biography has revealed how the Labour leader and his allies planned his challenge in advance of the election Keir Starmer had assembled a leadership team about six months before the December 2019 general election that led to Jeremy Corbyn’s resignation as Labour leader. The team, codenamed the “Arlington Group”, began planning in earnest how Starmer could capture the leadership from June of that year – including a detailed breakdown of how Labour’s membership could be convinced to support him. The revelation is made in a new biography of the Labour leader, Keir Starmer: The Biography, by Tom Baldwin, a former journalist who served as one of Ed Miliband’s advisers during his time leading the party. The group was formed as early as 2018 when Jenny Chapman, who was Darlington MP, asked him if he had ever thought about being the party’s leader. Starmer is said to have replied that it was something he “might want to do”. Meetings then began to take place on Monday mornings around the kitchen table at her home. Its codename was derived from the road in London where one of them lived. Those involved said that there was never a plan to topple Corbyn – the failed coup against him in 2016 had proved that it would be almost impossible to do so. Starmer is also said to have refused to acknowledge at that stage that he would be running. “Keir used to have this lawyerly phrase of: ‘I want to be in a position to consider standing – should a vacancy arise,’” said one of those involved. However, the preparations being made for a leadership attempt kicked into another gear in June 2019 with the arrival of an official that Starmer referred to as “the new guy”. It turned out to be Morgan McSweeney, now Labour’s influential campaigns director. Some were initially sceptical of McSweeney, who had also overseen Liz Kendall’s ill-fated leadership challenge in 2015, when she won less than 5% of the vote. However, he presented detailed research into the Labour membership – who would largely decide the identity of the party’s next leader – and how a winning coalition could be formed. “He got out his slide deck,” recalled Chris Ward, a former Starmer aide. “He ran through exactly where the membership was on every question, which bits of it we could get, which bits we couldn’t. It was brilliant. Afterwards, when we’re walking back, Keir had this little grin on his face, and was like: ‘D’you see what I mean now?’”

Sky’s Beth Rigby questions PM over decision to appoint Mandelson. Richard Burgeon MP on Mandelson. Wes Streeting – Mandelson must suffer the consequences of his actions. Labour rebels force Starmer into humiliating climbdown on Mandelson files Prime minister’s own integrity and judgement under scrutiny as he admits he knew of Peter Mandelson’s ongoing relationship with Epstein – but appointed him US ambassador anyway Starmer admits he was aware of Mandelson’s relationship with Epstein when making appointment Sir Keir Starmer’s leadership has been plunged into turmoil after furious Labour MPs forced him into a humiliating climbdown over the release of full vetting documents relating to Peter Mandelson’s appointment as the UK’s ambassador in the US. The prime minister’s dramatic U-turn followed intense pressure, led by former deputy prime minister Angela Rayner, just hours after he admitted that he knew about Lord Mandelson’s continued friendship with the paedophile Jeffrey Epstein – but appointed him as US ambassador anyway. Despite the revelation, which led many to question Sir Keir’s integrity and judgement, he insisted he was repeatedly lied to by the disgraced peer, who he said had “betrayed our country” over the alleged leak of sensitive government documents to the disgraced financier. On Wednesday night, ministers and other senior figures in Labour gave the prime minister an ultimatum that he must sack his controversial chief of staff, Morgan McSweeney, who pushed for Lord Mandelson’s appointment as ambassador and brought him back into the heart of the government. One minister told The Independent: “Morgan has to go – and should have gone months ago.” The prime minister had attempted to restrict the publication of the vetting documents, arguing that some details would need to be redacted on national security grounds. That prompted accusations from Labour MPs that he was engaging in a “cover-up”. After three hours into a Commons humble address debate on Wednesday, Sir Keir relented after Ms Rayner intervened to make it clear she would be supporting the Tory proposal for the independent Intelligence and Security Committee (ISC) to decide which documents could be published. It is unclear when the documents will be released to the committee and made public, but there is speculation that they could be available as early as Thursday. Seizing on the U-turn, a Conservative spokesperson said: “Kemi [Badenoch] forced Starmer to admit he’d known Mandelson was still hanging out with Epstein after the child sex conviction, and No 10 went ahead and appointed Mandelson anyway.

Misconduct in public office? What do emails between Mandelson and Epstein say? Newly released emails between Lord Mandelson and Jeffrey Epstein date back to when he was serving as a senior minister in Gordon Brown’s government Email exchanges published in the US indicate Lord Mandelson was in close contact with the disgraced late financier during a period in which he was at the heart of government amid the financial crisis. The emails suggest Lord Mandelson gave Epstein advance notice of an impending EU bailout, sent him internal government information about the state of the UK economy and lobbied the Treasury on banking policy at Epstein’s suggestion. We are still reviewing the millions of documents related to Epstein published by the US Justice Department but here is what has emerged about Lord Mandelson so far. Forwarding internal government information to Epstein One exchange in the newly released emails suggests Lord Mandelson forwarded internal government information to Epstein in June 2009, at which point he was acting as Gordon Brown’s business secretary and de facto deputy prime minister. Nick Butler, a policy adviser to the then-prime minister, wrote a memo about the UK’s struggling economy in which he recommended selling off government-held assets in order to raise public funds. He copied several people into the email, including Lord Mandelson. The published documents appear to suggest Lord Mandelson forwarded that internal government communication to Epstein, with the message: “Interesting note that’s gone to the PM.” In response to Epstein asking, “what salable [sic] assets?”, a reply from a redacted email address said: “Land, property I guess.” Lord Mandelson has been approached for comment.Advance notice of EU bailout for Greece Another exchange indicates Lord Mandelson gave Epstein advance notice of a €500bn bailout by the EU to save the ailing Euro. In the early hours of 10 May 2010, EU finance ministers agreed the deal amid concerns that a debt crisis in the Greek economy could spread to the wider Eurozone. The evening before the announcement, Epstein emailed Lord Mandelson to say: “sources tell me 500 b euro bailout , almost complete.” The released documents also appear to show Lord Mandelson told Epstein: “Sd be announced tonight.” Epstein then asked if Mandelson was home and received a reply, saying: “Just leaving No10..will call.” The UK did not contribute to the bailout, but then-chancellor Alistair Darling was present in Brussels for the negotiations. Lord Mandelson has been approached for comment.

BBC QT Dia Yusuf, Reform, on Labour sleaze and Mandelson. BBC QT Oli Dugmore, New Statesman, on Mandleson. Journalist hailed for ‘chilling’ Question Time speech on ‘disgusting’ Labour A JOURNALIST delivered a chilling speech on Labour’s “extraordinary” appointment of Peter Mandelson as US ambassador on Question Time. The studio audience were stunned into silence as the New Statesman’s Oli Dugmore lay bare his shock at revelations over the past week, including that Keir Starmer knew that Mandelson had continued his friendship with Jeffrey Epstein after the late paedophile’s conviction when he appointed him as US ambassador. The admission that came during Prime Minister’s Questions this week has led to some MPs suggesting Starmer’s position may now be untenable, as well as that of his chief of staff Morgan McSweeney. Dugmore was on the panel alongside Reform UK head of policy Zia Yusuf, Labour MP Emma Reynolds, Conservative MP Julia Lopez and LibDem MP Munira Wilson. Dugmore began by saying: “I’m generally a pretty forgiving person and I think our politics is poorer for its lack of empathy. “I think most people should not be defined by the worst thing they’ve ever done in their lives and most people deserve a second chance. “I do, however, have some moral boundaries, and one of them is I think it is wrong to have sex with children and I wouldn’t want to be friends with anyone that did that and I certainly wouldn’t want to work with them. If I did, I think you’d all be asking me questions and they’d be valid ones. “That is apparently now a fringe position for some people at the top of the Labour Party which is an extraordinary thing to be able to say. “I don’t know about you, I don’t know any paedophiles, I don’t know anyone that’s run a sex trafficking ring, these are extraordinary things we are talking about here.” Dugmore went on to talk about reports showing how people at the top of the Labour Party knew about Mandelson staying in Epstein’s house while he was in prison. To nervous laughter from the audience, he said: “They [Labour bosses] didn’t think that was disqualifying, they thought actually ‘this is our guy’. “This is our guy that we’re going to elevate to the most prestigious diplomatic posting that we have, we’re going to make him our man in Washington. Not only that, we’re going to bring him back to London every so often to advise on some Cabinet reshuffles, and actually when we’re choosing our candidates for the 2024 General Election, we’re going to let him put in on that too because we think he’s a great judge of character. “Like, come on.” The audience applauded his speech which has been widely shared on social media. Aaron Bastani, co-founder of Novara Media, said Dugmore had shown how “utterly monstrous” the situation was. “The facts, put plainly, sound utterly monstrous – and a genuine low for British politics,” he posted on Twitter/X. “It’s over.” Dugmore himself commented below the clip: “It’s disgusting.

Court case for van dwellers in Bristol this week. BBC PM – Hannah Miller report on van dwellers in Bristol. Trial date set as Downs ‘van dwellers’ saga nears an end About 45 vehicles remained parked on roads surrounding the park in north Bristol The number of vehicles parked around the Downs has dropped recently Bristol City Council is set for a court showdown as it moves to permanently ban people living in vehicles from the roads around the Downs. Article continues below In November, the council said it would seek to move people on from the Downs after designating the group of vehicles there as a ‘high impact’ site, due to what the council said was evidence of people using the area as a toilet. Nonetheless, about 45 vehicles remain parked on roads along the outside of the green space in leafy north Bristol. At its peak, the Downs ‘encampment’ consisted of about 150 vehicles. Now, a trial date has been set where the council will apply to have vehicles permanently barred from the area. At the trial, on April 16, the council will apply for a possession order for the roads, allowing them to evict people living in vehicles there, and then an injunction to prevent them from returning have the vehicles still occupying roads along the perimeter of the Downs. The court hearing will allow people on both sides of the debate to have their say; the council has until February 26 to publish a map detailing the proposed new exclusion zone, along with details of how people can take part in the court case. At a brief hearing outlining next steps in the long-running saga at Bristol Civil Justice Court on Thursday (February 5), the court heard from both critics and supporters of people living in vehicles. Alan Jenkinson, appearing on behalf of Protect The Downs – a group of locals who have waged a long campaign against the so-called van dwellers – said he wanted the scope of the proposed injunction to be extended to include other roads in the area. “We support the council’s application,” he said. “I would implore the court to extend the broad nature of the injunction to other roads. “We know from our experience and we’ve got substantial evidence to prove the danger to the public of allowing inhabitations on the roads. “(The vehicles pose a) real risk and threat to the community in the area.” Although the council has repeatedly promised to engage with the people still living in vehicles in the area to better understand their circumstances, there is limited evidence to suggest they have done so. Gerard Winstanley, from the Bristol Housing Action group, said more needed to be done to make sure people living in vehicles in the area had their say on their future. “We’ve had virtually no representation whatsoever from the people who are targeted by this exclusion order,” he said. “There are roughly 45 vehicles in the area. As part of our submission, what I’d just ask is that there’s more deliberate publicity given to the times and dates that these orders are being sought so that people can at least find out what the council intends to do and when.” Mr Winstanley said BHA would seek to be included as a party acting against the council in April’s trial. The council will also apply to extend a separate injunction which currently bars people from parking on the grass itself. That injunction is due to expire on July 25. Robin Denford, appearing on behalf of the council, said:“The injunction that has been granted already has worked extremely well,” citing the example of one trespasser who had been dealt with without any issues in January.

Rev Paul Williamson, former Vicar, on his protest at event ordaining Sarah Mullally as Archbishop – Sarah Mullally safeguarding failures. A retired vicar who objected to the confirmation of Sarah Mullally as Archbishop of Canterbury during the ceremony at St Paul’s Cathedral has told Premier he felt he had no other option after being repeatedly ignored by the Church of England when he has raised safeguarding issues. Rev Paul Williamson, who was priest in charge of St George’s Hanworth until he reached the church retirement age of 70, was escorted from the cathedral after he shouted “I object” during the service. The 77-year-old who carries a walking stick, said he was ready to walk out quietly but was “treated brusquely”. During the ceremony, the Vicar General said there had been “no valid objection” to Dame Sarah being confirmed as archbishop, something Rev Williamson disputes. “It was nonsense to say that there were no objections,” he said. “I objected and I’m not into making a scene in the house of God”. Lambeth Palace told Premier that public notices are always displayed before the Confirmation of Election for any diocesan bishop at the place where the Confirmation is due to take place. On this occasion, ahead of the Archbishop of Canterbury’s Confirmation of Election, notices were displayed outside Lambeth Palace and St Paul’s Cathedral. However, Rev Williamson said it would have been impossible for people outside London to read the notices and be aware they had to raise an objection before the King signed the Confirmation papers in December. Rev Williamson said he had last week met the Vicar General of the Province of Canterbury, Timothy Briden, to document his own formal objection ahead of Sarah Mullally’s confirmation. Premier has seen the documents which outline what Rev Williamson described as “three impediments” to the elevation of Bishop Sarah to the see of Canterbury. He cited the death of Fr Alan Griffin, a priest who took his own life after being falsely accused of abuse in the Diocese of London. A coroner strongly criticised the way the case was handled. Bishop Sarah apologised “unreservedly” to Fr Alan’s family and friends. Rev Williamson also alleged that Bishop Sarah had been too slow to act on information contained in files in the case of Martin Sargeant, a Diocese of London employee. Sargeant was sentenced to five years in prison in 2022 for defrauding the London Diocesan Fund of over £5m over a decade. He had also compiled rumours about dozens of priests in the diocese, which led to the compilation of files into 42 vicars which became known as the ‘Brain Dump’. Rev Paul also disclosed to the Vicar General that he had himself been driven to contemplate suicide over what he claimed was a lack of care by Sarah Mullally when he was evicted from his clergy housing in 2024. He claims that despite Lambeth Palace contacting Bishop Sarah to inform her of his situation, her only course of action was an email three weeks later containing information about a support group. The Diocese of London had previously said his tenure in office had come to an end in 2018 when he turned 70 and he had been given additional time to stay in the rectory rent-free until 2019. He continued to remain in the rectory until his eviction. In a statement at the time, a spokesperson for the Diocese of London said: “Mr Williamson’s eviction follows the issuing of a possession order by Staines County Court. The diocese has offered pastoral and practical support to Mr Williamson over the last six years, and has done so again ahead of today, including the offer of help in finding suitable accommodation, which we are reassured to know he has secured.”

Videos of full shows – Essentials: Michael Hudson | Blackrock/Vanguard | Netanyahu at the 7/7 London Bombings | Why/how Israel Assassinated JFK & RFK | Operation Gladio | Tony on Brexit & (4th Reich) Traitors of Arnhem | Creation vs. Evolution | God vs. Lucifer | ‘Great Plan’ for 3 World Wars | Devil Worship: The Rise Of Satanism | Nuclear Armed IDF Doomsday Cult | Aanirfan | Armageddonists I have known: Nick Land (1976-8) | George Monbiot (1995-7) | Manna for the Revelation Generation: CONSPIRACY CLASSICS, longer interviews/lectures

Part Two – International news review, Accelerationist, Armageddonist reports and investigations

LBC Andrew Marr – Epstein working for the KGB! Jeffrey Epstein ‘Russian spy’ claims emerge after files reveal Putin link ‘More and more leads’ point towards Jeffrey Epstein’s sex trafficking ring being ‘co-organised by Russian intelligence services’, Poland’s Prime Minister Donald Tusk has said Jeffrey Epstein was likely a ‘Russian spy’ and worked with the Kremlin to ‘co-organise’ his sex trafficking ring, it has been claimed. Poland’s Prime Minister Donald Tusk has announced a new investigation into the links between Epstein and Moscow after Vladimir Putin’s name appeared over a thousand times in the latest release of documents by the US Department of Justice over the weekend. It includes one revealing email exchange from 2010 when Epstein sent an email offering to help someone acquire a Russian visa, writing: “I have a friend of Putin’s, should I ask him?” Epstein also discussed setting up meetings with the Russian president, and even claimed to have turned down an invitation from Putin to meet on the sidelines of a St Petersburg conference in 2013, as there wasn’t “real time and privacy”. Jeffrey Epstein mentioned his connections with a ‘friend of Putin’s’ in one email exchange(Image: DoJ) In one audio file, Epstein is heard coaching an unnamed person on how to approach Putin, advising them: “I would send a note to Putin, saying ‘I’m going to leave government on March 14th. I’m going to be in Scandinavia, or I plan to be in western, northern Europe. We should have dinner’. That’s it, no more. It has to be very short.” It is not the first time observers have drawn a connection between the paedophile financier and the Kremlin. They have pointed to the large numbers of Russian women mentioned in his emails and his apparent links to Putin’s inner circle. Announcing the new investigation by Polish authorities, Tusk said experts now believed it was “very probable” that Epstein’s activities received co-operation as part of a Kremlin “honey trap” operation, adding: “More and more leads, more and more ?information, and more and more commentary in the global press all relate to the suspicion that this unprecedented paedophilia scandal was co-organised by Russian intelligence services. “I ?don’t need to ?tell you how serious the increasingly likely possibility that Russian intelligence services co-organised this operation is for the security of the Polish state. Donald Tusk said it was ‘very probable’ that Epstein’s activities were assisted with as part of a Kremlin ‘honey trap’ operation “This can only mean that they also possess compromising materials against many leaders still ?active today.”  

A Mossad op: ‘Epstein’s Shadow: Ghislaine Maxwell’ superb 2021 documentary – Ari Ben-Menashe, ex Israeli Intelligence, says Robert Maxwell, Ghislaine, and Epstein worked for Mossad. How Jeffrey Epstein’s intelligence ties go back decades The disgraced, convicted sex offender inhabited a murky world of business, spies and arms dealers Jeffrey Epstein discussed the UAE invading Qatar, obtained intelligence on a €500bn bailout to save the Euro before it happened, and appeared to have information that Russia tipped off Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan about a failed coup d’etat in 2016. These snippets into the conversations of the disgraced paedophile, who mysteriously died in his New York City jail cell in 2019, raise new questions about his ties to intelligence agencies. Millions of newly released files do not show Epstein clocking into a Mossad, MI6, or CIA office building. But he did not need to. Current and former ambassadors, world leaders, and moguls came to him, and his Caribbean island, where he trafficked young women for sexual abuse. The reality is that Epstein floated in a world that was unreachable and more elite than that of intelligence case officers and desk analysts. If current observers trying to make sense of Epstein’s links to intelligence agencies need an example, the closest might be The Night Manager, a mini-series based on the novel by John Le Carre. The main antagonist of the show is Richard Onslow Roper – a cut-glass, arms-dealing businessman who is an asset for members of British Intelligence and global corporations, even as he is hounded by other factions of MI6. Of course, Epstein’s emails to former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barack reveal such close and continued contact with Israel that even Epstein had to implore Barack to “make clear that i dont work for mossad”. But Epstein’s murky ties to intelligence circles go back much farther. The earliest known connection Epstein had to the world of intelligence goes back to Donald Barr. This is also the weakest link. Barr was a former member of the OSS, or Office of Strategic Services, the WWII forerunner to the CIA. Barr hired Epstein, who did not have a college degree, to work as a math and physics teacher at one of New York City’s most elite schools, The Dalton School. Ironically, Barr wrote pornographic science fiction novels in his spare time. His son Bill was working for the CIA when Epstein was hired by his father. Bill worked in the Reagan and George HW Bush administrations before serving as attorney general during the first Trump administration. Epstein left the Dalton School in 1976 and took a job with the now-defunct Bear Stearns investment bank, trading options and advising wealthy clients. Epstein’s real links to figures in the world of weapons, the ultra-rich and intrigue started in full force in 1981 when he made a trip to the UK with a former girlfriend. There, Epstein met Douglas Leese, an aristocratic British arms dealer who would play a key role in introducing Epstein to Mossad agent Robert Maxwell and high-rolling Saudi Arabian arms dealer Adnan Khashoggi.

EPSTEIN AND THE UKRAINE COUP/WAR: Low Key, Double Down News, Epstein and Ghislaine a Mossad sting operation. RT – Victor Pinchuk, Ukrainian oligarch, in contact with Epstein. In Davos, a Ukrainian Billionaire Is Fighting for Kyiv’s Cause Victor Pinchuk has lobbied wealthy elites to help save his country, but his business is also on the line Victor Pinchuk likes to stay out of the limelight and hasn’t spoken to the media in years. But he’s given away a fortune advocating for Ukraine and knows Donald Trump from way back. That makes him the right conduit for Kyiv’s interests as the global elite gather in the Swiss Alps. His Ukraine House, a concrete cube along the Davos promenade, has become a fixture at the World Economic Forum and was the place to be to watch Trump get sworn in. But trying to get the rich and influential to open their wallets for his homeland has become a harder sell. The Ukraine House pavilion in Davos.Photographer: Hollie Adams/Bloomberg The Kremlin’s forces are steadily advancing on the battlefield, while Kyiv’s allies are publicly discussing whether President Volodymyr Zelenskiy should quickly accept an unfavorable peace deal just to end the fighting. Trump didn’t even mention Ukraine in his inauguration speech — something that didn’t go unnoticed in Kyiv. He’s called US aid into question and demands even greater sacrifices from Ukrainians themselves. With potential talks between Kyiv and the Kremlin the No. 1 topic at Ukraine House, Pinchuk’s role as the corporate bridge to the West has become even more critical. But he’s also got his own future to think of after seeing Russia’s destruction of his country, jeopardizing his assets. “Pinchuk was the most westernized oligarch from the very beginning,” says former Polish President Aleksander Kwasniewski, who sits on the board of his foundation. “He knows the West.” Visitors watch a livestream of the Donald Trump US Presidential inauguration ceremony at Ukraine House pavilion in Davos, on Jan. 20.Photographer: Alessandra Migliaccio/Bloomberg Ukraine’s western tilt is a cause the 64-year-old businessman has been engaged with for the past 20 years, organizing regular events that bring together international decision makers with Ukrainian politicians in an effort to knit his country into the western alliance that he has long seen as crucial to its security. Read More: Davos Crowd Flocks to Ukraine House for Trump Inauguration Bash Born in Kyiv to a family of middle-class intellectuals who later moved to the industrial city of Dnipro, Pinchuk’s wasn’t a rags-to-riches story compared with the tough, working-class upbringing that Ukraine’s richest man Rinat Akhmetov, said Kwasniewski. Ukraine’s turbulent transition from Soviet rule in the 1990s was the making of Pinchuk and other tycoons. He built his fortune shipping pipes and used the profits to acquire various assets during large-scale privatization. He developed a diverse business empire, along with a controversial reputation like many former Ukrainian oligarchs. In 2002 he married Olena, daughter of then-president Leonid Kuchma. Victor and Olena Pinchuk in 2008.Photographer: Luc Castel/Getty Images In 2004, while his father-in-law was in office, Pinchuk bought the country’s largest steel mill in the city of Kryvyi Rih in tandem with Akhmetov. After Kuchma left as president the following year, the new government seized the mill and resold it to Lakshmi Mittal for about six times the price Pinchuk and Akhmetov had paid. It was around that time that Pinchuk started to develop his role as a bridge-builder, convening regular high-level gatherings. In 2004, he founded the Yalta European Strategy, or YES, bringing together Ukrainian and international decision-makers and celebrities in support of the country’s western integration. Last year, Trump addressed the event by video conference. “Pinchuk has the infrastructure and experience,” said Serhiy Leshchenko, a former investigative journalist who is now an advisor in Ukraine’s presidential office. “The state has the need.” It’s a project that has afforded Ukraine a lot of high-level connections, says Leshchenko, who attended many of Pinchuk’s events in his previous career as a journalist. And it immersed Pinchuk himself in a complex world of at times shifting loyalties and interests.

ReallyGraceful – Epstein represented the Rothschilds. Jeffrey Epstein’s business ties with banker Ariane de Rothschild revealed The latest release of the Epstein files by the US Department of Justice has confirmed the extremely close relationship between the French-German head of the Edmond de Rothschild group and the convicted sex offender. From 2013 until his death in 2019, he acted as an unofficial adviser to the Switzerland-based bank. “Can you believe this b-s****!!!” On September 16, 2015, Ariane de Rothschild expressed her annoyance to Jeffrey Epstein in an English-language email that reflected the informal relationship between the two correspondents. To her American friend, the French-German head of the Swiss banking group Edmond de Rothschild forwarded a message from Jacob Rothschild of the British branch of the financial dynasty. Epstein asked her to call him, stepping in as a mediator in the conflict that then pitted Ariane de Rothschild, in Geneva, against a rival and another family member, David de Rothschild, based in Paris. David, at the head of his investment bank in France, and Ariane, who became the all-powerful leader of the Edmond de Rothschild Group in Switzerland in January 2015 thanks to the support of her husband, Benjamin (who died in 2021), were at war with each other. David provoked Ariane’s anger when he renamed his firm, Paris Orléans, as Rothschild & Co and began presenting himself as the “Rothschild Group.” She saw this as a usurpation of the prestigious family name, which could damage her standing with investors and wealthy clients. This battle over the name only ended in 2018, when the two parties reached an agreement on how it could be used. In September 2015, tensions between the “cousins” reached their peak, and Ariane de Rothschild provided Epstein with near real-time written updates on this otherwise confidential battle. In return, the businessman offered his advice. “I would give david an alternative (…), ex , D , rothschhild and sons.? .. d rothschild and co. . DE rothschild.?” he wrote on September 18, 2015. Taken from the so-called Epstein files – millions of legal documents released by the US Department of Justice – these exchanges shed light on the extremely close relationship that existed between Ariane de Rothschild, who holds the title of baroness and whose personal fortune is estimated at €5.3 billion by the French business magazine Challenges, and Epstein. Between one of the most powerful figures in European private banking and the New York financier, the relationship, both friendly and professional, lasted from 2013 to 2019, ending only with Epstein’s arrest in the United States on numerous sex crime charges. Epstein died in prison in August 2019. Ariane ‘talks about you every day’ First revealed by The Wall Street Journal in 2023, their connection was initially downplayed by de Rothschild. The latest set of the Epstein files, published on January 30 by US authorities, has shattered that version of events. Hundreds of emails show that Epstein was a close friend of the 60-year-old banker and acted as her unofficial business adviser. Since their release, these documents have fueled the most absurd conspiracy theories and countless antisemitic posts on social media. None of the material reviewed by Le Monde implicates de Rothschild in Epstein’s sexual crimes.

The Deep Dive Perspective, Moseen Abbas, interviews London Neteuri Karta Rabbis on Iran riots. Times of Israel – Netanyahu on downfall of Iranian regime as part of Gaza peace plan. Rabbis’ BOMBSHELL Message to Trump: DON’T Start the Zionist Iran War! Deep Dive Perspective Rabbi Beck: A leading voice from the Neturei Karta, an international anti-Zionist Jewish movement. Rabbi Sofer: A scholar and researcher on Judaism, Zionism, and geopolitics. This is the BOMBSHELL message that Donald Trump needs to hear. Two anti-Zionist Rabbis issue an urgent plea to the US President: DON’T let the Zionist lobby drag you into a catastrophic Iran War! This is a deep dive into the religious and geopolitical forces pushing the world to the brink. Two Anti-Zionist Rabbis from Neturei Karta issue an urgent plea to Donald Trump: Do not let the Zionist lobby drag the US into a catastrophic war on Iran. This deep dive exposes the fundamental conflict between true Torah Judaism and political Zionism. Esteemed Rabbis Beck and Sofer expose the “Greater Israel” project, a colonial, expansionist agenda that has nothing to do with authentic Judaism. They reveal how powerful Zionist billionaires like the Adelson family buy influence in Washington, manipulating US foreign policy to serve Zionism, not America. They argue that a war with Iran would be a disaster for everyone, including the Jewish people, who will be blamed for the actions of a “prime terrorist minister.” This is a powerful counter-narrative from authentic Jewish voices, providing a perspective on Iran, Trump, and Zionism that you will never see on the mainstream media. This BOMBSHELL message from these brave Rabbis is a desperate plea for peace before it’s too late. The world is watching to see if Trump will listen.